Clinical and radiological results of locking plate fixation for periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasties: a retrospective multi-center study

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proportional Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ORIF in patients with different fracture patterns (Vancouver B1 and B2).

Materials and Methods

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed from inception to August 2022. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the 10 comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 39 articles to determine a consensus. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis, irrigation/debridement and revision arthroplasty.

Results

The pair-wise meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between two groups; the risk of reoperation (odds ratio [OR]=0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.55, P=0.542), nonunion (OR=0.49; CI 0.22-1.10, P=0.085) and deep infection (OR=1.89, CI 0.48-7.46, P=0.361). In proportion meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of reoperation was 9% (95% CI, 6-12) in B1 and 8% (95% CI, 2-15) in B2 (heterogeneity between two groups (Q), P=0.772). The pooled prevalence of nonunion was same as of 4% in B1 and B2 (Q, P=0.678), and deep infection was 2% (95% CI, 1-3) in B1 and 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in B2 (Q, P=0.130).

Conclusion

ORIF is a feasible treatment for B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, with acceptable outcomes in terms of, nonunion and infection. The results of this study would help clinicians and provide baseline data for further studies validating PFF.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Osteoporotic Proximal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Proximal Bicortical Fixation and Allograft Struts

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the strength of proximal bicortical fixation using a novel osteoporotic synthetic bone model of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic proximal periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs) and to assess the influence of strut allograft augmentation with regard to allowing early assisted weight bearing. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether the strut position, either medial or anterior, influenced the strength of the construct.

METHODS

Thirty synthetic osteoporotic femurs were implanted with cemented stems. A segmental defect made distal to the stem simulated a fracture and was repaired with a stainless steel locking compression plate and 2 stainless steel proximal locking attachment plates. Specimens were then divided into 3 groups: no-strut, medial strut, and anterior strut. Cadaveric femoral struts were wired to the specimens. Cyclic axial compression simulated assisted weight bearing and was followed by loading to failure.

RESULTS

Medial struts required higher failure load than no-strut (P = 0.008) and more energy to failure than anterior (P = 0.018) or no-strut (P < 0.001). The higher load to failure, however, would not be advantageous in clinical practice because estimates for assisted weight bearing after fractures in average-weight patients are well below these failure loads. Furthermore, all specimens tolerated cyclical loading. All failures occurred distal to the plate originating at the last screw hole.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure loads for all groups were above what would be expected for low-demand activities of assisted weight bearing. Therefore, proximal bicortical fixation should allow for early, assisted weight bearing without allograft strut augmentation even with lower density bone.

Application of Far Cortical Locking Technology in Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Lack of fracture movement could be a potential cause of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixation failures. This study aimed to test whether the use of distal far cortical locking screws reduces the overall stiffness of PFF fixations and allows an increase in fracture movement compared to standard locking screws while retaining the overall strength of the PFF fixations.

METHODS

Twelve laboratory models of Vancouver type B1 PFFs were developed. In all specimens, the proximal screw fixations were similar, whereas in 6 specimens, distal locking screws were used, and in the other six specimens, far cortical locking screws. The overall stiffness, fracture movement, and pattern of strain distribution on the plate were measured in stable and unstable fractures under anatomic 1-legged stance. Specimens with unstable fracture were loaded to failure.

RESULTS

No statistical difference was found between the stiffness and fracture movement of the two groups in stable fractures. In the unstable fractures, the overall stiffness and fracture movement of the locking group was significantly higher and lower than the far cortical group, respectively. Maximum principal strain on the plate was consistently lower in the far cortical group, and there was no significant difference between the failure loads of the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that far cortical locking screws can reduce the overall effective stiffness of the locking plates and increase the fracture movement while maintaining the overall strength of the PFF fixation construct. However, in unstable fractures, alternative fixation methods, for example, long stem revision might be a better option.