Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of different single-shade resin composites to human teeth of various shades

Influence of depth and translucency on the color matching of single-shade resin composites: An in vitro study

To evaluate whether the depth and translucency of the restoration influence the color matching of single-color resin composites, cylindrical cavities (2-and-4 mm depths) were prepared in acrylic teeth 62 shade (n=10). Restorations were performed with single-shade resin composites (OC: Omnichroma, Tokuyama; VU: Vittra APS Unique, FGM) and a control multi-shade (EO: Estelite Omega, Tokuyama). The color matching was measured in instrumental analysis (CIEDE2000 color difference formula (ΔE00)) and visual analysis (0 to 4 scale). The translucency of discs (2-and-4mm thickness) was obtained by color difference (ΔE00) between black and white background. Two-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Tukey's test was used to evaluate instrumental analysis, and Kruskal-Wallis followed by the post-hoc Tukey's test to evaluate color matching with a significance level of 5%. Restoration depths affected the ΔE00 values of OC and VU (p<0.05) (higher ΔE00 values for 4-mm depth and higher for OC and VU (p< 0.05)). The restoration depths did not influence the color matching in the visual analysis. VU and OC showed higher translucency scores than EO. At 2 mm, OC showed higher translucency values and there was no difference between OC and VU at 4 mm (p <0.05). The color matching of OC and VU was influenced by depth (instrumental analysis). While the OC had a similar color matching to EO at both depths, VU had the best color matching in both depths in the visual analysis. Single-shade materials had greater translucency than EO at different depths, and the translucency decreased with increasing depth.

Color Matching and Stability of Single-Shade Chameleon Dental Composites: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review evaluates the color-matching ability (ΔE00 values) and chromatic stability of single-shade chameleon dental resin composites in restorative dentistry.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing color adaptation and stability of single-shade composites in vitro, in clinical trials, and in retrospective analyses were included.

RESULTS

Seven studies (four in vitro, two clinical trials, one retrospective study) reported ΔE00 values within clinically acceptable thresholds (< 3.3). Clinical trials showed that single-shade composites (e.g., Omnichroma, Vittra APS Unique) achieved comparable aesthetic outcomes to multi-shade composites over 12-18 months. Factors such as staining agents and cavity depth influenced color stability, with coffee exposure causing the most discoloration. Bleaching procedures induced minimal color shifts. Study heterogeneity limited meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Single-shade chameleon resin composites provide reliable color adaptation and stability, streamlining shade selection and reducing clinical time. However, staining susceptibility and restoration depth must be considered for long-term aesthetic success.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Single-shade chameleon composites simplify shade selection, reducing chair time and enhancing efficiency in restorative dentistry. However, clinicians should consider staining susceptibility and restoration depth to ensure long-term aesthetic stability.

Color adjustment of single-shade composites following staining, repolishing, and bleaching procedures

OBJECTIVE

This in vitro study aimed to assess the color adjustment level of single-shade composites following staining/repolishing and bleaching procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cervical cavities in two depths (1 mm and 2 mm) were restored. Three single-shade composites (Omnichroma, OM; Essentia Universal, EU; and Charisma DiamondOne, CDO) and one group-shade composite (NeoSpectraST, NEO) were used (n = 10 for each). Following the thermal aging, half of the restorations were subjected to staining and repolishing procedures, while the other half were subjected to bleaching procedures. The color adjustments between restoration and adjacent tooth surfaces were assessed. The deemed significance was set at < 0.050.

RESULTS

According to the initial measurements, the NEO composite presented the lowest ∆E00 while the OM presented the highest (P = .005 and P = .014). Single-shade composites presented similar and clinically acceptable ∆E00 values (P ≥ .050; AT ≤ 1.8). After the staining, the ∆E00 of the OM was higher among the other single-shade composites (P = .001). Repolishing procedure decreased only the ∆E00 of the NEO composite (P = .020). The bleaching procedure provided no difference for the single-shade composites (P ≥ .050). The increase in the cavity depth decreased the initial color adjustments for the OM in both repolishing and bleaching groups (P = .041 and P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

Re-polishing after aging and staining may not enhance the single-shade composites' color adjustment level, unlike the group-shade composites. Good color adjustment might be predicted for the single-shade composites after bleaching, unlike the group-shade composites. The effect of the cavity depth was considered composite brand dependent.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Clinicians should understand the color adjustment behaviors of the single-shade composites well after different clinical procedures such as staining, re-polishing, and bleaching to perform a proper restorative treatment plan and to obtain better esthetic outcomes.

Clinical performance of an ormocer-based single-shade resin composite for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 18-month randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

This double-blind, split-mouth, randomized equivalence clinical trial aimed to evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of an ormocer-based single-shade resin composite compared with an ormocer-based multi-shade resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).

METHODS

One hundred and twenty restorations were performed on NCCLs with two restorative materials (n = 60): Admira Fusion X-tra resin composite (ormocer-based single-shade), and Admira Fusion resin composite (ormocer-based multi-shade). After rubber dam isolation, a universal adhesive was applied in the selective enamel etching strategy. For both groups, restorations were inserted incrementally and light-cured. The restorations were clinically evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months according to the updated FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using Friedman repeated measures ANOVA by rank and Mann-Whitney test for pairwise significance (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

All restorations were evaluated after 18 months, and nine restorations were lost. Fracture of the material and retention rates (95 % confidence interval [CI]) were 93 % (84-97 CI) for the ormocer-based single-shade and 91 % (82-96 CI) for the ormocer-based multi-shade, with no statistical differences between them (p > 0.05). The absolute risk (95 % CI) was 0.8 (0.2 to 3.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The updated FDI evaluation criteria showed equivalent results for ormocer-based single-shade and ormocer-based multi-shade after 18 months.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Using an ormocer-based single-shade resin composite in NCCLs is advisable due to its convenience, ease of application, and lower cost compared to ormocer-based multi-shade composites without compromising clinical performance.

Surface characteristics and bacterial adhesion on single-shade composite resins: A comparative in vitro study of one-step versus multi-step polishing techniques

This study evaluated the effects of two polishing systems, OptraGloss (G; one-step) and OptiDisc (D; multi-step), on surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion on three single-shade composite resins: Omnichroma (O), ZenChroma (Z), and Charisma Diamond One (C). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Streptococcus mitis (S. mitis) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α=0.05). Multi-step polishing groups (OD, ZD, and CD) exhibited significantly lower SR (0.18, 0.18, and 0.29 µm, respectively) compared to OG (0.46 µm), ZG (0.30 µm), and CG (0.44 µm) (p<0.05). The highest CA was observed in ZG (91.6º). S. mitis adhesion was greater than S. mutans in all groups except OG. A significant correlation was observed between SR and the adhesion of S. mutans (r=0.693, p<0.001). Polishing systems applied to single-shade composite resins did not impact the SFE but affected SR, and bacterial adhesion.

Color evaluation of a one-shade used for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: an equivalence randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Obtaining a perfect color match with resin composite presents a significant challenge. The chameleon effect has enabled resin composite to mimic the color of the adjacent tooth structure in vitro. This double-blind, split-mouth and equivalent randomized clinical trial evaluated the color matching of one-shade resin composite with chameleon effect versus multi-shade resin composite in non-carious cervical lesion restorations (NCCLs).

METHODS

One hundred twenty restorations were performed on NCCLs with two restorative materials (n = 60). After prophylaxis, the teeth were isolated with rubber dam and one universal adhesive was applied in the selective enamel etching strategy. For both groups, the restorations were inserted incrementally. The values of ΔEab and ΔE00 in the cervical and middle third were evaluated using a digital spectrophotometer before vs. after the restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 7 days, 6-, 12- and 18-month of clinical performance according to the FDI criteria (Word Federation Criteria). Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test for all parameters. Color change was analyzed by two one-sided t-tests for paired samples (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Regarding the color measurement no significant difference was observed when Vittra APS (FGM Dental Products, Joinville, SC, Brazil) was compared to Vittra Unique (FGM Dental Products, Joinville, SC, Brazil) for any of the comparisons performed (p > 0.05). However, the ΔEab and ΔE00 values for the cervical third, both before and after the restorations, were higher compared to the ΔEab and ΔE00 values observed when comparing the cervical and middle thirds after the restorations. After 18 months, five restorations exhibited minimal discrepancies in terms of marginal adaptation or marginal discoloration (p > 0.05). In all other criteria, including retention rate, no changes were detected at the 18-month recall.

CONCLUSIONS

The one-shade resin composite used achieve the same color match when compared to a multi-shade resin composite after a period of 7 days in NCCLs. Overall, the restorations scored clinically very good (FDI) at baseline and after 18 months for all outcomes.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of a one-shade resin composite in NCCLs can be recommended because it has the ability to simplify the restoration procedure and maintaining an excellent clinical performance.

REGISTRATION OF CLINICAL TRIALS

RBR-8txr4fw: 26/05/2022.

Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate variations in the surface roughness and gloss of different single-shade resin composites after polishing with a range of systems.

METHODS

In total, 120 specimens were prepared from three different types of single-shade resin composites (supra-nanospherical-Omnichroma, nanohybrid-Charisma Diamond One, and microhybrid- Essentia Universal). The specimens were placed in distilled water and stored at 37 °C for 24 h. Each resin composite (n = 40) was divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the finishing/polishing (F/P) system: Mylar strip (control), Sof-Lex (multi-step), Twist Dia (two-step), and OneGloss (one-step). Surface roughness and gloss were measured. Surface characteristics were evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference test were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Among all the composites, both the highest surface roughness and lowest gloss values were obtained in the groups treated with the OneGloss polishing system (p < 0.05). Compared with all the composites, Omnichroma had the lowest surface roughness and highest gloss values (except Twist Dia) both unpolished and after polishing with all the F/P systems (p < 0.05). All composites treated with the Twist Dia F/P system had similar gloss values. The results of the AFM and SEM analyses were consistent with the surface roughness measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The gloss values of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites after F/P using the two-step system was superior to that of the traditional multistep system. The surface of the supra-nanofilled resin-based composite was smoother than that of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites.

Does different application modes of universal adhesives with universal resin composites affect the microleakage in class V cavities? An in vitro study

AIM

Composite restorations often have gingival margins near the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), where the microleakage of these margins can significantly contribute to the restoration failure, especially in the cervical lesions. It is important to determine the microleakage is crucial, as it typically occurs through the interfacial gap between the tooth and the restoration. Various resin composites and techniques have been developed to minimize this gap and reduce the risk of microleakage. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the levels of microleakage of different modes of a universal adhesive and two novel resin composites in restoring class V cavities in the central incisors.

METHODS

Sixty-six freshly extracted sound human central incisors of the similar size were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 33 per group) according to the brand of resin composite. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups based on the Scotch Bond Universal (3 M ESPE, Saint Paul, MN, USA) application protocol used: (a) total etch, (b) self-etch and (c) selective etch. After composite restoration completed with Omnichroma (Tokuyama Dental Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and Filtek Universal Restorative (3 M ESPE, Saint Paul, MN, USA), each tooth was immersed in a 0.5% basic fuchsin dye solution at 37C0 for 24 h. After dye penetration, teeth were sectioned and evaluated with conventional (scoring) and digital methods (ImageJ). The intra- and inter-examiner agreement was estimated according to the Kappa statistics and the results were analyzed with the one-way ANNOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The rates of microleakage of the gingival and incisal margins are statistically similar, regardless of the composite brand and the method of application of the universal adhesive.

CONCLUSION

The microleakage exhibited by current adhesives and resins is independent of the adhesive application mode and measurement method.

Visual evaluation of the color adjustment of single-shade and group shade resin composites in restorations with different cavity configurations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of the tooth shade, type of resin composite and cavity configuration on the color adjustment of single-shade and group shade resin composites.

METHODS

Class I and V cavities were prepared in artificial acrylic mandibular right molars with different shades - A1, A2, A3, A3.5 and A4. Three single-shade (OMN, UNI, CHA) and two group shade (FIL, HAR) resin composites were evaluated. Seventy-five observers, including dentists, dental students and laypersons (n = 25), participated in the study. A psychophysical experiment based on visual assessments of the color matching between each tooth and each restoration was ranked from 0 (excellent match) to 4 (huge mismatch), and mean frequencies (%) were calculated. Visual color differences among composite materials and tooth shades were statistically tested (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The results showed highest percentages of unacceptable color mismatches for class V compared to class I restorations, especially for more chromatic tooth shades (A3.5 and A4). The percentage of ratings of acceptability was higher for laypersons group. For class V, OMN presented significant difference only from UNI in tooth shades A1, A2, A3 and A4. However, for class I, OMN presented significant differences with CHA for A1, A2 and A4, and with HAR and FIL for A1.

CONCLUSIONS

Class I resin composite restorations exhibit superior color matching than Class V, with lighter and low chroma tooth shades demonstrating better color adjustment. The color matching of both cavity configurations is comparable for single and group shade resin composites.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Cavity configuration and tooth shade may impact color matching of single and group shade resin composites. This study demonstrates superior color matching in class I configurations over class V for both single and group shade resin composites. Additionally, restorations placed in teeth with lighter shades exhibit more favorable color adjustment.

Evaluation of direct restorations for pit-and-fissure caries using stamp combined with single-shade composite resin technique: A 12-month follow-up in vivo study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical performance of direct restorations for pit-and-fissure caries in molars using stamp combined with single-shade composite resin (S/SCR) technique, and assess the effect of the number of stamp pressing on the trueness of S/SCR technique.

METHODS

Twenty molars of fifteen patients with pit-and-fissure caries but with an intact or micro-cavitated occlusal morphology were restored using S/SCR technique and were randomly divided into single pressing group (n = 10) and double pressing group (n = 10). Intraoral scans were obtained before treatment (scan 1), after filling (scan 2) and after polishing (scan 3). Deviation distribution maps of pairwise fitting were created including comparison 1 (scan1/scan 2), comparison 2 (scan1/scan 3), and comparison 3 (scan2/scan 3) using Geomagic Control X software. Root mean square (RMS) values were calculated to evaluate the trueness of restorations. Clinical performances including esthetic, functional, and biological properties of all restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria after a 12-month follow-up. Analysis of variance, independent-samples T test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05).

RESULTS

RMS values for comparison 1, comparison 2, and comparison 3 were 0.1243 ± 0.0151, 0.0966 ± 0.0136, and 0.0605 ± 0.0137 mm in single pressing group, while 0.0831 ± 0.0140, 0.0741 ± 0.0107, and 0.0475 ± 0.0099 mm in double pressing group, respectively. RMS value of single pressing group was higher than that of double pressing group in the same comparison (p ≤ 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). For all properties, all restorations scored within 3, with over 80% scoring 1.

CONCLUSION

S/SCR technique presents satisfying clinical performances for pit-and-fissure caries in molars after a 12-month follow-up. Besides, double pressing can improve the trueness of restorations compared to single pressing.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

S/SCR technique is efficient in direct composite resin restoration for pit-and-fissure caries, with satisfying esthetic, functional and biological properties after a 12-month follow-up. Significantly, double pressing improves the trueness of S/SCR technique, reducing the need for occlusion adjustment.

Dental Color-Matching Ability: Comparison between Visual Determination and Technology

BACKGROUND

The choice of the correct color is of paramount importance in esthetic dentistry; however, there is still no consensus on the best technique to determine it. The aim of the present study is to compare the accuracy of a recently introduced colorimeter in shade matching with human vision. In addition, possible variables affecting color-matching by human eye have been analysed.

METHODS

18 disc-shaped composite samples with identical size and shape were produced from a composite flow system (Enamel plus HriHF, Micerium): Nine were considered control samples (UD 0-UD 6), and nine were test samples with identical flow composite shade to the control ones. Parallelly, 70 individuals (dental students and dental field professionals) were individually instructed to sit in a dark room illuminated with D55 light and to perform visual shade matching between control and test discs. An error matrix containing ΔE94 between control and test discs was generated, containing four match-clusters depending on perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. The frequency and severity of errors were examined.

RESULTS

The colorimeter achieved a 100% perfect matching, while individuals only achieved a 78%. A higher occurrence of mismatches was noted for intermediate composite shades without a statistically significant difference. No statistically significant differences were reported for age, sex, and experience. A statistically significant difference was present among the Optishade match and the visual determination.

CONCLUSIONS

The instrumental shade-matching evaluation proved to be significantly more reliable than the human visual system. Further research is needed to determine whether the same outcomes are achieved in a clinical setting directly on patients.

Assessing color mismatch in single-shade composite resins for enamel replacement

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Shade selection is a challenge in restorative dentistry. While single-shade composite resins may simplify this process, whether the color mismatch between this composite resin and the substrate is within acceptable levels to ensure successful outcomes is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of background and surrounding shade, thickness, and proximity to the surrounding on color mismatch when shaded and single-shade composite resins are used in the center of an enamel layer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two-layer specimens mimicking dentin (the background) and enamel (the surrounding and center) were prepared. Two shades were used for the background and the surrounding layer (OA1/A1 and OA3/A3). At the Ø3-mm center, 2 single-shade composite resins were placed, Omnichroma (OM) and Admira Fusion x-tra (FU), and also shaded composite resins A1, WE, A3, and C2. For the OA1/A1 background and surrounding, shades A1 and WE served as positive controls, while the A3 and C2 were negative controls. For OA3/A3, these controls were reversed. Two enamel layer thicknesses were evaluated (0.5- and 1.0-mm). Reflectance measurements were made at 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 2.5 mm from the center. Color differences were calculated between those at 2.5 mm and at other distances (ΔE0, ΔE1, and ΔE2). Data analysis employed a 4-way repeated measure ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections for the pair-wise comparisons (α=.05).

RESULTS

Background and surrounding shade, central shade, distance, and thickness affected color mismatch (P<.05). For the OA1/A1 specimens, single-shade color mismatch values were found between both the positive and negative controls (P<.05). For the OA3/A3 specimens, the color mismatch did not differ significantly from that of negative controls (P>.05). No difference was found between ΔE0 and ΔE1, but each was distinct from ΔE2. Thickness did not affect the color mismatch of the single-shade composite resins (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-shade composite resins for enamel replacement showed higher color mismatches compared with positive controls.

Surrounding and background shades effect on color adjustment of single-shade composites

This study evaluated the effects of surrounding and background shades on the color adjustment potential (CAP) and visual color match of two single-shade composites, Vittra APS Unique and Charisma Diamond One. Cylinder-shaped specimens were constructed, consisting of either single-shade composites alone (simple) or composites surrounded by the Forma material at shades A1 or A3 (dual). Simple specimens using only the Forma at the specified shades were also prepared. Color measurements of simple specimens were taken against a gray background using a spectrophotometer. For dual specimens, the color of the inner composite was measured against a gray or chromatic (the same shade as the outer composite) background. Color differences (ΔE00) between the single-shade composites and the A1/A3 composite were calculated. CAP was determined by comparing data from simple and dual specimens. Four experienced dentists scored the color match (perfect to unacceptable) for each specimen using a viewing booth illuminated by an illuminant D65. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The results showed that both single-shade composites showed the lowest color discrepancies when they were compared to A1 and A3. Using a chromatic background only significantly affected the CAP when the outer composite was A3. The visual analysis showed poor color matches between the single-shade and control chromatic composites, except for Charisma Diamond One surrounded by A1. In conclusion, the CAP values of the evaluated single-shade composites were impacted by both surrounding shade and background color, and the color match of these materials tended to be poor.

Influence of cavity wall thickness on the color adjustment potential of single-shade resin composites

BACKGROUND

The color adjustment potential of resin composites depends on the specific characteristics of the surrounding structures. The authors evaluated the influence of cavity wall thickness on CIEDE2000 color adjustment potential (CAP00) of single-shade composites using the CIEDE2000 color difference (ΔE00) formula.

METHODS

Two types of specimens were produced: single, using Vittra APS color DA3 (FGM Dental), Vittra APS Unique (VU) (FGM Dental), and Omnichroma (Tokuyama Dental) composites; and dual, using Vittra APS color DA3, but with cavity wall thicknesses of 3, 2, or 1 mm, restored with VU or Omnichroma. CIEL∗a∗b∗ color coordinates were obtained from digital photographs of the specimens at different locations, and ΔE00 and CAP00 were calculated. Statistical analysis included 2-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, Holm-Sidak, Student-Newman-Keuls, Wilcoxon signed rank, and paired t tests (α = 5%).

RESULTS

Cavity walls 1-mm-thick had higher ΔE00 values and lower CAP00 values, particularly for VU (P < .05). Restorations matched better with the control at the periphery than the central area (P < .001). Overall ΔE00 means exceeded the color perceptibility threshold (ie, 0.8) and the acceptability threshold (ie, 1.8). Color differences (between center of restoration and control composite) were moderately unacceptable for 3-mm and 2-mm thicknesses and extremely unacceptable for 1-mm thickness. Both composites had a ΔE00 color shift predominately determined by means of the lightness difference. Positive CAP00 values were found for VU and Omnichroma.

CONCLUSIONS

Wall thickness, especially at 1 mm, negatively impacted the color of single- shade composites. This effect was more pronounced for VU, affecting mainly the restoration's central area.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Color matching ability depends on the structural and material characteristics, and clinicians should be attentive to these factors when using single-shade resin composites.

Flexural strength and degree of conversion of universal single shade resin-based composites

Background/purpose

Recently, a group of universal single-shade resin-based composites (RBCs) has been developed to simplify the process of shade selection. Excellent mechanical and physical properties are crucial for the ultimate success and clinical longevity of restorations. Therefore, evaluating the properties of the single-shaded RBCs is imperative. This study aimed to determine the flexural strength (FS) and degree of conversion (DC) of universal single-shade RBCs.

Materials and methods

In this study, four commercial RBCs were used; three universal single-shade RBCs; Omnichroma (OC), Charisma® Diamond ONE (CD), and Vittra APS Unique (VU), and a conventional nanohybrid composite Filtek™ Z250 XT (FT) which was used as a control. Sixty composite beams and 40 composite discs were used for FS and DC, respectively. A universal test machine with a three-point bending test was used to measure the FS, whereas the DC was measured using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR). Three fractured specimens from each resin composite group were qualitatively analyzed using scanning electron microscopy.

Results

ANOVA was used to compare the mean values of FS and DC among the four RBCs (OC, CD, VU, and FT). Highly significant differences were observed in the mean FS and DC values (F = 673.043, p < 0.001 and F (=782.4, p < 0.0001), respectively. The highest FS was observed in the CD group, followed by FT and VU groups; the lowest value was observed in the OC group. In addition, a statistically significant difference was identified in DC values. The highest DC value was observed in VU, followed by OC and CD, and the lowest DC value was observed in FT.

Conclusion

Universal single-shade RBCs demonstrated a good FS, except for OC, which exhibited a significantly low FS. The DC of the universal single-shade RBCs was higher than that of the conventional nanohybrid composite restorative material.

Color match of single-shade restorations after professional dental bleaching: An in vitro study

Background

Restorative dentistry aims to reproduce natural tooth shades through resin composites that must be layered to obtain colors, opacities, and translucencies, and therefore, clinical success is operator skill dependent.

Aims

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the color shift of single-shade composite restorations before and after dental bleaching.

Materials and Methods

Eighty human extracted posterior teeth were restored with four single-shade composites (Omnichroma OM; Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal CL; Essentia Universal ES; Venus Diamond One VE) (n = 20 each). Standardized V class cavities were prepared on buccal side. VITA Easyshade V spectrophotometer was used to register VITA color and color coordinates 24 h before (T0), 24 h after (T1), and 1 week after (T2) dental bleaching (Opalescence Boost PF 40%). Color differences (ΔEab) and (ΔWID) were calculated and subjected to statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson Chi-square, and data from color coordinates were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test with Bonferroni correction. Paired t-tests were performed to compare continuous measures between groups and treatment time.

Results

Instrumental evaluations revealed statistically significant differences between materials (P < 0.05) with lower values for ES and VE samples followed by CL and OM at T0 and T1. At T2, OM and CL ΔEab values decrease getting closer to ES and VE.

Conclusion

Single-shade composites seem to match with the surrounding bleached tooth.

Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface properties of universal single shade resin-based composites

BACKGROUND

Recently, universal single-shade resin composites have become increasingly available in the dental market. The modification of their composition can have an inadvertent effect on their physical and surface properties, and subsequently determinantal effect on their clinical function and longevity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing (F/P) systems on surface roughness (Ra), surface gloss (GU), and Vickers microhardness (VMH) of universal single-shade RBCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four commercial RBCs were used; the universal single-shade RBCs were Omnichroma, Charisma® Diamond ONE, and Vittra APS Unique, and a conventional nanocomposite Filtek™ Z250 XT was used as a control. The 3 F/P systems were Sof-Lex™ XT, Enhance®/PoGo®, and Diacomp® Plus Twist. A total of 160 discs were used for the 3 F/P system groups for all RBCs (n = 10). After F/P, the Ra, GU, and VMH were assessed. The data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA at p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found among the four RBCs and the 3 F/P systems (p < .000). Omnichroma showed the lowest Ra and acceptable GU, but the lowest VMH. Charisma showed the highest Ra, acceptable GU, and VMH. Vittra showed acceptable Ra, GU, and VMH and Filtek showed the highest GU, VMH, and acceptable Ra.

CONCLUSION

Although conventional nanohybrid RBC (Filtek Z250 XT) showed better GU and VMH values, the universal single-shade RBCs demonstrated comparable surface properties. The highest GU & VMH and lowest Ra were achieved by Diacomp followed by Enhance and Soflex.

Effects of background color and restoration depth on color adjustment potential of a new single-shade resin composite versus multi-shade resin composites

The objectives of this study was to evaluate the effects of background color and restoration depth on color adjustment potential of a new single-shade resin composite versus multi-shade resin composites. Two multi-shade resin composites (Spectrum TPH3 and Clearfil AP-X) marked A2 shade and a new single-shade resin composite (Charisma Diamond One) were tested. Four base shades (A1, A2, A3, and A3.5) of the same resin composite (Filtek Z250) were selected as different background colors. Dual specimens with 1-, 2-, and 3-mm restoration depth and single specimens of all materials were fabricated. CIE color coordinates were measured using a spectrophotometer, then color differences (∆E00) and translucency parameter (TP00) were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Independent observers performed visual scoring. CAP-I and CAP-V values were calculated according to ΔE00 and visual scoring. The results revealed that CAP-I and CAP-V were significantly affected by resin composite type, background color, and restoration depth. CAP-I and CAP-V decreased as restoration depth increased at the same background color for all materials. Charisma Diamond One had the highest CAP-I and CAP-V values at all background colors and restoration depths, with the highest TP00 value. These findings demonstrated that color adjustment potential was dependent on resin composite type, background color, and restoration depth, so shade selection is indispensable for multi-shade resin composites. Charisma Diamond One exhibited the highest color adjustment potential and the most pronounced color shifting, contributing to simplifying the process of shade selection and improving the efficiency of clinical work.

The role of interface distance and underlying substrate on the color adjustment potential of single-shade composites

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed how the distance from the composite interface and the underlying chromatic substrate affect the color adjustment potential (CAP) of two single-shade composites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cylinder-shaped specimens were created using Vittra APS Unique (VU), Charisma Diamond One (DO), and a shaded (A3) composite. Some single-shade specimens were surrounded by the A3 composite, forming dual specimens. Color measurements of simple specimens were taken against a gray background using a spectrophotometer. All specimens were positioned at a 45° angle in a viewing booth under illuminant D65, and images were captured with a DSLR camera against gray or A3 backgrounds. Image colors were measured using image processing software and converted to CIELAB coordinates. Color differences (ΔE00 ) between the single-shade composites and the A3 composite were calculated. CAP was determined by comparing data from simple and dual specimens.

RESULTS

No clinically significant differences were observed between color measurements obtained from images and the spectrophotometer. CAP was higher for DO compared to VU and increased as the distance from the composite interface decreased and when specimens were positioned against an A3 background.

CONCLUSION

The color adjustment potential increased with decreased distance from the composite interface and against a chromatic background.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Achieving satisfactory color match in restorations using single-shade composites is crucial, and selecting an appropriate underlying substrate is essential. The color adjustment gradually decreases from the restoration margins towards its center.

Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of a recently introduced single‑shade composite resin versus multishade composite resins

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Single-shade composite resins simplify the process of shade selection by providing a narrow range of color but the ability to simulate all shades. However, evidence is limited for the color shifting ability of a newly developed single‑shade composite resin.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the instrumental color adjustment potential (CAP-I) and visual color adjustment potential (CAP-V) of a recently introduced single-shade composite resin compared with conventional multishade composite resins against different background colors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four multishade composite resins (Spectrum TPH3, Beautifil II, Clearfil AP-X, and Gradia Direct) and a single-shade composite resin (Charisma Diamond One) were tested. Four base shades (A1, A2, A3, and A3.5) of the same composite resin (Filtek Z350XT) were selected as different background colors. Dual specimens (an outer base material with an inner hole filled with inner test material) and single specimens of all test and base materials were prepared (n=6 per group). Spectral reflectance values were obtained by using a spectroradiometer. The color difference (ΔE00) and relative translucency parameter (RTP) were calculated by using the CIEDE2000 and RTPCIEDE2000 formula. Visual scoring of color matching was performed by independent observers. The CAP-I and CAP-V values were calculated according to ΔE00 and visual scoring. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis (α=.05).

RESULTS

CAP-I and CAP-V were significantly affected by composite resin type, background color, and their interaction (P<.001). Positive CAP-I and CAP-V values were found for the majority of test materials. Charisma Diamond One exhibited the highest CAP-I value under all background colors, the highest CAP-V value under most background colors, and the significantly highest RTP value (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The color adjustment potential was dependent on the material type and background color. Charisma Diamond One exhibited the highest color adjustment potential and the most pronounced color shifting ability.

Effect of bleaching on the color match of single-shade resin composites

PURPOSE

To evaluate the color match of single-shade resin composites before and after bleaching procedures, through instrumental and visual analyses.

METHODS

Class V cavities were created on the buccal surfaces of 80 extracted human molars, restored with 4 single-shade composites (Omnichroma; Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Universal; Essentia Universal; Venus Diamond One). A spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V) was used to evaluate the tooth/resin color match before (T0), and 24 h (T1) and one week (T2) after dental bleaching (Opalescence Boost PF 40%). Color variations (ΔE00) were calculated and statistically analyzed (P < 0.05). Visual analysis was performed before and after tooth bleaching.

RESULTS

Spectrophotometric evaluations revealed statistically significant differences between materials at T0, T1, and T2 (P < 0.05). Visual analysis reported excellent and very good grades (0 and 1, respectively), irrespective of the materials and timepoints.

CONCLUSION

Data seem to indicate that single shade composites are able to shift their color when the surrounding tooth undergoes bleaching effects. Single-shade composites seem to achieve a good color match with the surrounding tooth structure, before and after professional bleaching.

Evaluation of Single-Shade Composite Resin Color Matching on Extracted Human Teeth

Introduction

Universal single-shade composite resins are characterized by a property that enables the creation of restorations that mimic tooth structure to the extent possible with fewer shades of color.

Objectives

This study aimed to instrumentally and visually evaluate the color correspondence of two single-shade composite resins in extracted human teeth multishade composite resins.

Methods

Upper central incisors and upper and/or lower molars with intact buccal surfaces were selected. The study consisted of a control group (n = 20): Z250 XT (3M ESPE) (G1) multishade composite resin in colors A1 to A4, and a test group (n = 20) divided further into two equal groups, consisting of single-shade composite resin Omnichroma (Tokuyama Dental) (G2) and single-shade composite resin Vittra APS Unique from (FGM) (G3). Instrumental evaluation was performed using a spectrophotometer, and visual evaluation was performed by three observers. Descriptive measurements related to the differences in color obtained through instrumental means were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, wherein the means were compared using ANOVA, applying the Bonferroni post hoc test.

Results

A statistically significant difference was observed among the groups (G1, G2, and G3) (ANOVA: p < 0.001). For the visual assessment, regardless of the assessment group, 77.49% of the teeth were within the acceptable color-match classification, with the single-shade resins showing better correspondence than the multishade resins.

Conclusion

Single-shade composite resins showed different color-matching results when compared to multishade resins, both in spectrophotometry and visual evaluations. Clinical Significance. Single-shade composite resins simplify the shade-selection process and are promising materials for use in dental practice.