Dynamic salivary cytokine profile of recurrent aphthous stomatitis patients in thalidomide maintenance treatment

Efficacy and safety of thalidomide for recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is considered as the most common oral mucosal lesion affecting up to 25% of people worldwide. Thalidomide has been reported for the treatment of RAS, but the evidence has not been systematically evaluated. We first systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of thalidomide for the treatment of RAS.

METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and VIP information from inception to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing thalidomide with control for RAS were included in the analysis. The primary outcome were complete response and overall response, and the secondary outcome were recurrence interval (RI), ulcer number and size, healing time, visual analogue scale (VAS), immunological data, and adverse events. Meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Twenty-one trials involving 1668 patients were included in this review. The results of our meta-analysis showed that thalidomide significantly improved the complete response rate and overall response rate, prolonged the recurrence interval, accelerated the healing process, reduced the number and size of ulcers, and lowered TNF-α levels in the treatment of RAS. However, thalidomide significantly increases adverse events.

RESULTS

Thalidomide has a significant benefit in the treatment of RAS. However, considering the potential side effects of thalidomide, it may be an optimal treatment option for major RAS patients or cases that do not respond to topical agents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024495038.

A Novel Therapeutic Approach of 980 nm Photobiomodulation Delivered with Flattop Beam Profile in Management of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis in Paediatrics and Adolescents-A Case Series with 3-Month Follow-Up

Background/Objectives: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is one of the most common oral mucosal lesions and a very debilitating lesion, especially in paediatric and adolescent patients. The current pharmacotherapy offers a pain relief but not without side effects, and therefore photobiomodulation (PBM) can be an alternative therapy. To the authors' best knowledge, no published study has explored the efficacy of λ 980 nm laser PBM in the management of all RAS subtypes in paediatric and adolescent patients, and therefore, this prospective observational clinical study was conducted to bridge this gap by evaluating λ 980 nm laser PBM efficacy in symptomatic RAS management in paediatric and adolescent patients. The objectives were to evaluate (1) pain intensity alleviation; (2) wound healing rate; (3) wound size closure; (4) a complete resolution; (5) evidence of recurrence; and (6) patients' treatment satisfaction. Methods: The study's variables were assessed at the following timepoints: T0: pre-treatment; T1: immediately after first PBM session; T2: 5 hours (h) post first PBM session (via telephone call); T3: immediately after second PBM session (three days post first PBM session); T4: three-day follow-up (after complete PBM treatments); T5: two-week follow-up; and T6: three-month follow-up. The following PBM dosimetry and treatment protocols were employed: λ 980 nm; 300 mW; 60 s; 18 J; CW; flattop beam profile of 1 cm2 spot size; 18 J/cm2; and twice-a-week irradiation (72 h interval). Results: At T1, significant immediate pain intensity relief was reported. 33.33% recorded "4" and 66.67% reported "5" on the quantitative numeric pain intensity scale (NPIS), and this continued to improve significantly (83.33%) at T2. All the subjects reported "0" on the NPIS at T3, T4, T5 and T6. There was a significant reduction in the lesion surface area (>50% complete healing) at T3 compared to T0. Complete healing (100%) with no evidence of scarring and lesion recurrence observed at T4, T5 and T6. Very good patients' satisfaction was reported at all timepoints. Conclusions: This is the first report demonstrating λ980 nm efficacy in all RAS subtype management in paediatric and adolescent patients with a 3-month follow-up, whereby its PBM dosimetry and treatment protocols were effective from scientific and practical standpoints, and hence multicentre RCTs with large data are warranted to validate its reproducibility and to enrich the knowledge of PBM application in all RAS subtypes.