Long-term hard and soft tissue response following isolated genioplasty: a systematic review

Optimizing Esthetic Outcomes and Bone Stability: Chin Advancement Through Inverted V Osteotomy

Traditional horizontal osteotomies for small and short chins often yield suboptimal results due to limited bone advancement, resulting in deep labiomental folds and heightened bone resorption risks. This study investigates the effectiveness of an innovative inverted V-shaped osteotomy technique in enhancing esthetic outcomes for patients with such chin concerns. Thirty-eight patients who underwent inverted V-shaped osteotomy for recessed chins between January 2018 and June 2022 were included. Excluding cases involving simultaneous mandibular contouring surgery, patients were followed up for a median duration of 1.2±0.5 years. Preoperation and postoperation soft tissue pogonion (Pg') and labiomental fold depth (LMF) changes were measured. IBM SPSS (version 27.0) was used for statistical analysis, with significance defined as P <0.05. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale. Successful advancement genioplasty was performed on all patients without any severe complications. The average change in soft tissue pogonion (Pg') measured 6.2 (1.9) mm, and the mean alteration in labiomental depth was 0.42 (0.4) mm. The procedure achieved a bone to soft tissue movement ratio of 1:0.96. Patient satisfaction was notably high, with a mean VAS score of 8.7. An inverted V-shaped osteotomy enables greater bone advancement for small and short chins, leading to improved esthetic outcomes and offering a mechanically advantageous condition for bone segments.

Accuracy of the CAD/CAM technique compared with the conventional technique used for stand-alone genioplasty

The benefit of the computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique for stand-alone genioplasty remains uncertain and was evaluated in this study. Patients who underwent a conventional genioplasty (n = 20) or genioplasty with the CAD/CAM technique (n = 20), and for whom cephalometry and photogrammetry were performed before and 6 months after surgery, were included. Deviations from predictions of the soft tissue pogonion (Pg'), lip inferior point to aesthetic line (Li-Esth), facial convexity angle (FCA), mentolabial angle (MLA), and ratios of soft to hard tissue movements were calculated. No significant deviation was observed for Pg' in either the conventional group (3.85 ± 4.36 mm; 1.91 ± 1.11 mm) or CAD/CAM group (1.28 ± 1.16 mm; 2.81 ± 3.08 mm), for horizontal and vertical movements, respectively. However, for forward movement, deviation from the prediction of Pg´ in the CAD/CAM group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P = 0.015). Deviations of Li-Esth, MLA, and FCA did not differ significantly between the groups. No definite preference for the CAD/CAM technique could be established, because deviations from predictions were not significant in either of the technique groups and lay within the clinically acceptable range.

Osseous genioplasty versus chin implants: early complications and patient satisfaction

Osseous genioplasty and chin augmentation with implants are the two main treatment options for retrognathia. This retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the prevalence of complications and patient satisfaction following osseous genioplasty and chin augmentation by implant. Eighty patients were included: 38 underwent advancement osseous genioplasty and 42 received chin implants (alloplastic, either Medpor or Silastic) intraorally or extraorally. The patients were assessed for complications 12 months after surgery, including neurosensory disturbances, infection or extrusion, wound dehiscence, and the need for reoperation. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analogue scale. The infection rate was significantly higher in the chin implant group than in the genioplasty group (P = 0.028). Moreover, dehiscence and the need for reoperation appeared to be more common following chin augmentation with implants. However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of neurosensory disturbances between the two groups (P = 0.137). In the chin implants group, the extraoral approach resulted in a lower dehiscence rate than the intraoral approach. Patients in the genioplasty group had significantly higher satisfaction scores than those in the chin implant group (P = 0.001). Overall, the rates of the complications assessed were lower and patient satisfaction was higher after osseous genioplasty when compared to chin augmentation with implants.

Exploring the relationship between the number of systematic reviews and quality of evidence: an orthognathic surgery-based study

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the quality and quantity of systematic reviews (SRs) of orthognathic surgery, the most frequently published topic in maxillofacial surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched the PubMed database for SRs of orthognathic surgery with no restriction on the language of publication date. We assessed the certainty of evidence presented according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol and the Leiden Manifesto using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, Pearson´s correlation test, and linear regression.

RESULTS

Of the 171 SRs evaluated, approximately one fifth presented evidence with a high level of certainty. The number of orthognathic surgery SRs has been increasing, and many SRs were published after very similar topics had already been published. There is no relationship between the impact factor and the certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

An excessive number of SRs of orthognathic surgery are published, and many SRs are superfluous, simply reporting previous findings. Clinicians should not base treatment decisions solely on the evidence presented in SRs, and journal editors and reviewers should evaluate these SRs more critically, particularly when they address topics that have already been covered in the literature.

Three-dimensional analysis of hard and soft tissue changes in skeletal class II patients with high mandibular plane angle undergoing surgery

This study aimed to study 3-dimensional (3D) changes of hard and soft tissues of skeletal class II patients after 2-jaw surgery and genioplasty. 32 adult patients diagnosed with mandibular hypoplasia who underwent 2-jaw surgery of maxillary impaction, mandibular advancement and genioplasty were enrolled. Cone-beam computed tomography and 3D stereophotogrammetry was conducted 1 week before and 6 months after surgery. Dolphin imaging software was used to establish a 3D digitizing model and 3D measurement system. Paired t-test was performed to compare the values before and after surgery. Pearson's correlation test assessed the degree of correlations between hard and soft tissue change. The mean impaction of the maxilla was 2.600 ± 3.088 mm at A. The mean advancement of the mandible was 7.806 ± 2.647 mm at B. There was a significant upward and forward movement for most landmarks of the nose and lip, while a significant decrease in nasal tip height (lateral view), upper lip height, and upper and lower vermilion height. The nose's width was significantly increased. For maxillary, Sn, Ac-r, Ac-l, and Ls demonstrated a significant correlation with A and U1 in the anteroposterior axis. However, there were no significant correlations among them in the vertical axis. For mandibular, Li demonstrated a significant correlation with L1 in the anteroposterior axis specifically for the mandible. Notably, correlations between the landmarks of the chin's hard and soft tissues were observed across all axes. The utilization of 3-D analysis facilitated a quantitative comprehension of both hard and soft tissues, thereby furnishing valuable insights for the strategic formulation of orthognathic treatment plans targeting patients with skeletal class II conditions.