Aortoenteric fistula development following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a case report

Aortoenteric Fistulas Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Review

BackgroundSecondary aortoenteric fistulas (SAEF) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is an extremely rare event but life threatening. Our review offers comprehensive knowledge on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options.AimTo summarize the current literature regarding pathophysiology, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic approach of aortoenteric fistulas secondary to EVAR.MethodsWe performed a literature search in Pubmed/MEDLINE to identify the literature published about SAEF after EVAR. Cases were summarized in a table and prevalences. Other relevant literature was included in the results sections.ResultsA total of 35 reports (single cases and small series) with 45 patients were included. SAEF after EVAR can result from infection, inflammation, or mechanical factors. Clinical presentation is often non-specific, ranging from a gastrointestinal herald bleed to hemorrhagic shock, or malaise and general infection-related symptoms. Cross-sectional imaging plays a critical role in diagnosing SAEF. The treatment approach involves a multidisciplinary team approach and requires broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, endovascular intervention for urgent hemorrhage control, and open surgical intervention for definitive repair. Long-term antimicrobial therapy is essential to avoid reinfection.ConclusionsSAEF following EVAR represents a complex, life-threatening condition with limited evidence-based management strategies. Given the growing prevalence of endovascular procedures, comprehensive knowledge of SAEF is crucial for all health care providers to improve early diagnosis and outcomes.

Aortoduodenal fistulas after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and open aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we have reported and compared aortoduodenal fistulas (ADFs) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs after open aortic repair (OAR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients treated for ADFs from January 2015 to May 2020 in our hospital. The clinical data, diagnostic procedures, and surgical options were evaluated. The primary endpoints of the present study were 30-day and 1-year mortality. The secondary endpoints were major postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (20 men; median age, 69 years; range, 53-82 years) were admitted with ADFs after EVAR (n = 9) or OAR (n = 15). These patients accounted for ∼4.3% of all abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in our hospital. The median interval from the initial aortic repair and the diagnosis of ADF was 68 months (range, 6-83 months) for the ADF-EVAR group and 80 months (range, 1-479 months) for the ADF-OAR group. Three patients in the ADF-EVAR group had refused surgical treatment owing to their high surgical risk. One patient in the ADF-OAR group had undergone removal of the aortic prosthesis without replacement. Of the remaining 20 patients, 12 (ADF-EVAR group, n = 4; ADF-OAR group, n = 8) had undergone in situ replacement of the aorta and 8 (ADF-EVAR group, n = 2; ADF-OAR group, n = 6) had undergone extra-anatomic reconstruction with aortic ligation. After a mean follow-up of 26 months, no patient had experienced early limb loss. However, one case of rupture of the venous graft (ADF-EVAR), one case of aortic stump blowout (ADF-OAR), and one case of a ureteroarterial fistula with a homograft (ADF-OAR) had occurred. Overall, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly greater after ADF-OAR (93% vs 33%; P = .036). The most frequent bacteria involved in the blood cultures were Escherichia coli (25% of patients), and Candida spp. (61%) were the predominant pathogens found on intra-abdominal smears. The in-hospital mortality rates for the ADF-EVAR and ADF-OAR group were 22% and 13%, respectively. The corresponding 1 -year mortality rates were 22% and 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ADFs after EVAR or OAR have limited overall survival. In addition to the similar therapeutic approaches, we found no significant differences in postoperative mortality between these two uncommon pathologic entities. In our study, the overall postoperative morbidity seemed greater for the ADF-OAR group.

Secondary Aorto-enteric Fistula and Type II Endoleak Five Years after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Introduction

Secondary aorto-enteric fistula (AEF) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a rare but potentially fatal disease. The aetiology and mechanisms are unclear. This study presents a patient who developed secondary AEF and type II endoleak five years after EVAR.

Case

A 73 year old man underwent successful EVAR with a bifurcated aortic stent graft for a 5.5 cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The aneurysm sac showed no change in size for three years, then shrank 20 mm to 3.5 cm by five years. After five years and eight months, the patient presented with fever and back pain. Enhanced CT demonstrated enlargement of the aneurysm sac, type II endoleak from the third and fourth right lumbar arteries, and air around the stent graft. An emergency operation was performed. The infected stent graft was removed by pushing up the stent graft to release the hooks from the wall of the aorta. A small fistula resembling a fish mouth measuring 1×1 cm was observed in the third part of the duodenum. The fistula was closed by direct suture, and in situ reconstruction was performed with an 18×9 mm standard polyethylene terephthalate graft. Culture of the explanted stent graft grew enterobacter. Intravenous antibiotic therapy was continued for six weeks and was stopped after confirming no recurrence of infection with computed tomography and laboratory testing. Two years later, there has been no recurrence of infection.

Conclusion

Long term surveillance is critical because AEF can occur even after initially successful EVAR.

•

Secondary aorto-enteric fistula post endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair can occur in the late phase of follow up.

•

Staged omentopexy may be beneficial for prevention of recurrent infection.

•

Type II endoleak can affect the development of secondary aorto-enteric fistula.

Editor's Choice - Management of Secondary Aorto-enteric and Other Abdominal Arterio-enteric Fistulas: A Review and Pooled Data Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare management strategies for secondary abdominal arterio-enteric fistulas (AEFs).

METHODS

This study is a review and pooled data analysis. Medline and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1999 and 2015. Particular emphasis was given to short- and long-term outcomes in relation to AEF repair type.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixteen publications were retrieved, reporting on 823 patients. In-hospital mortality was 30.7%. Open surgery had higher in-hospital mortality (246/725, 33.9%), than endovascular methods (7/98, 7.1%, p < .001, OR 6.7, 95% CI 3-14.7, including staged endovascular to open surgery, 0/13, 0%). In-hospital mortality after graft removal/extra-anatomical bypass grafting was 31.2% (66/226), graft removal/in situ repair 34% (137/403), primary closure of the arterial defect 62.5% (10/16), and for miscellaneous open procedures 41.3% (33/80), p = .019. Among the subgroups of in situ repair, homografts were associated with a higher mortality than impregnated prosthetic grafts (p = .047). There was no difference in recurrent AEF-free rates between open and endovascular procedures. Extra-anatomical bypass/graft removal and in situ repair had a lower AEF recurrence rate than primary closure and homografts. Late sepsis occurred more often after endovascular surgery (2-year rates 42% vs. 19% for open, p = .001). The early survival benefit of endovascular surgery was blunted during follow-up, although it remained significant (p < .001). Within the in situ repair group, impregnated prosthetic grafts were associated with the worst overall and AEF related mortality free rates and vein grafts with the best. No recurrence, sepsis, or mortality was reported following staged endograft placement to open repair after a mean follow-up of 16.8 months (p = .18, p = .22, and p = .006, respectively, compared with patients in other groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular surgery, where appropriate, is associated with better early survival than open surgery for secondary AEFs. Most of this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up, implying that a staged approach with early conversion to in situ vein grafting may achieve the best results in selected patients.

Aortoenteric Fistula: A Late Complication of Endovascular Repair of an Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Endovascular repair provides a reasonable alternative to open repair for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in select cases. Although the endovascular approach may be preferable for inflammatory aneurysms, aggressive surveillance is needed to monitor for long-term complications. A 61-year-old man underwent endovascular exclusion of a symptomatic inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm with an AneuRx bifurcated aortic prosthesis. He presented with gastrointestinal bleeding 51/2 months later and was found to have an aortoenteric fistula involving the third portion of the duodenum. The aneurysm had expanded significantly at the proximal neck. The patient underwent successful removal of the device, aortic ligation, and extraanatomic bypass. Aortoenteric fistula is a rare but now established complication of endovascular aneurysm repair. The pathophysiology in these cases remains unclear. The presence of inflammation and endoleak may predispose to further aneurysmal degeneration.

Aortoduodenal Fistula after Abdominal Aortic Stent Graft Presenting with Extremity Abscesses

Aortoenteric fistula (AEF) has been described after endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). AEF after EVAR has been associated with aneurysm growth, endoleak, migration, and aortic inflammation. We report a patient with an AEF presenting 2 years after EVAR with two abscesses in the right leg. A computed tomographic scan showed a gas-filled thrombus lining the right limb of his graft. At conversion, no endoleak, device migration, or residual aneurysm sac was found. AEF can occur after endoluminal stent graft (ELG) in the absence of aneurysm growth, endoleak, migration, or inflammation. AEF can cause ELG infection and extremity infection.

Conservative treatment of an aortoesophagial fistula after endovascular stent grafting for a thoracic aortic aneurysm

Background

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is an uncommon condition that presents a problem in therapy because of the high rate of morbidity and mortality associated with its surgical management and the uniformly fatal outcome of medical treatment. In this article we describe a case of secondary AEF after endoluminal stent grafting of the thoracic aorta, which was observed by only conservative management and followed up for 14 months with no signs of recurrent hemorrhage or chronic mediastinitis.

Case Report

A 54-year old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was admitted to our hospital because of tarry stool. He had a history of traumatic aneurysm, and undergone segmental replacement with a stent graft three years ago. After admission, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and computed tomography identified AEF. He was treated conservatively, because his stage of HCC was advanced. Oral intake was prohibited, and the patient received proton pump inhibitors, intravenous hyperalimentation and antibiotics. Afterwards, no signs of hemorrhage were observed. Although oral intake was resumed after that, another bleeding event or development of mediastinitis was not observed. Subsequently, He was received chemotherapy for advanced HCC, and we observed downstaging of his advanced HCC.

Conclusions

Although we observed 14 months survival in our case under conservative management of secondary AEF, it seems that the treatment of secondary AEF should do the operative management.

Is F 18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Too Sensitive for the Diagnosis of Vascular Endograft Infection?

We report a case of a false positive fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan in a patient who presented with abdominal pain, and gastrointestinal bleeding accompanied by elevation of inflammatory markers, seven weeks after a proximal type I endoleak repair with a cuff extension. Aortoenteric fistula and endograft infection was ruled out by laparotomy. FDG-PET image may have a role in diagnosis of infection, but false positive results are possible and caution is necessary if other data are non-confirmatory.

[Recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a 61 year-old man with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm]

A 61-year-old man was admitted to hospital due to recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Four weeks ago, he had been treated with epinephrine and endoclips by endoscopy due to an arterial gastrointestinal bleeding. The patient had a history of coronary and peripheral artery disease, diabetes, and an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Urgent endoscopy suggested the presence of an ulcus Dieulafoy but no definitive bleeding source could be seen. Due to ongoing melena an abdominal computer tomography was performed and a primary aortoduodenal fistula was suspected caused by the infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Laparatomy was undertaken emergently and an aortoduodenal fistula was found in the descending part of the duodenum. Repair of the duodenal rent was performed and the aortic aneurysm was replaced by a Dacron prosthesis. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. 4 days after initial admission, he died due to septic shock.

[Repair of secondary aortoenteric fistulas. A systematic review]

We performed a systematic review of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of secondary aortoenteric fistulas (AEF). A MEDLINE search was performed of articles published in English or Spanish between January 1991 and August 2006. Diagnostic methods, treatment modalities and the results of surgical treatment were analyzed. The most frequent first aortic surgery associated with AEF was repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (54.31%). The most common form of presentation was gastrointestinal bleeding. Repair through in situ prosthetic replacement had the lowest early mortality rates (8-13.3%) compared with graft excision and extraanatomic revascularization (18.2-44%). AEF is a serious entity and diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion based on clinical findings and indirect data from imaging techniques (computed tomography). The most appropriate therapeutic option continues to be controversial.

Aortoduodenal fistula 5 years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the Ancure stent graft

We report a case of aortoduodenal fistula 5 years after uncomplicated endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The diagnosis was confirmed by abdominal computed tomography scan and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The patient was successfully treated with primary duodenal repair, removal of the infected graft, in situ placement of a bifurcated graft, and omental interposition. Review of the literature identifies this as one of very few documented aortoduodenal fistulas after endovascular aneurysm repair. Fistulization occurred despite accurate stent graft placement without migration, endoleak, or aortic sac size enlargement on annual postoperative imaging studies.

Diagnosis of Aortoenteric Fistulas with CT Angiography

PURPOSE

To describe the diagnostic findings of primary and secondary aortoenteric fistulas (AEFs) at computed tomographic (CT) angiography in a cohort of patients known to have AEF and to correlate those findings with those from endoscopic gastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT angiography was performed in nine patients with AEF. There were four men and five women aged 43-85 years (mean age, 67 years). All CT angiograms were retrospectively reviewed for signs of AEF. Reports from EGD, surgery, and pathologic examination were also reviewed.

RESULTS

One patient had a primary AEF, and eight patients had a secondary AEF. Findings at CT angiography were suggestive of the diagnosis in all nine patients. The two definitive CT angiographic findings were identification of the graft within the bowel lumen in two patients (22%) and active extravasation in one patient (11%), allowing the definitive diagnosis in three of the nine patients (33%). Secondary signs, which helped predict the high likelihood of the diagnosis but could also be seen in graft infection or inflammation without AEF, were as follows (in descending order of frequency): effacement of the periaortic or perigraft fat plane and the fat plane between the aorta and bowel (nine patients, 100%), perigraft soft tissue (nine patients, 100%), bowel wall thickening adjacent to the graft (eight patients, 89%), perigraft fluid (seven patients, 78%), perigraft hematoma (six patients, 67%), pseudoaneurysm or aneurysm bulge (six patients, 67%), ectopic gas (five patients, 56%), and dystrophic vascular graft calcification (one patient, 11%). The diagnosis was confirmed surgically in seven patients and with clinical follow-up in two.

CONCLUSION

CT angiography is well suited for helping make or suggesting the diagnosis of AEF and is potentially more accurate than EGD.

Evolving strategies for the treatment of aortoenteric fistulas

BACKGROUND

Aortoenteric fistulas (AEFs) are a rare but often fatal cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Operative repair of AEF has been historically associated with extremely high morbidity and mortality. We reviewed our experience of open surgical and endovascular treatment of AEF to compare outcomes over a contemporaneous time period.

METHODS

Over a 9-year period between January 1997 and January 2006, 16 patients (11 men and 5 women) were diagnosed with and treated for AEFs. Seven patients underwent open surgical repair, and nine, with anatomically suitable lesions, underwent endovascular repair. The outcome after treatment of these patients was investigated for survival, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, and long-term disposition.

RESULTS

Three primary and 13 secondary AEFs were treated. The mean time from the initial aortic operation until AEF diagnosis was 5.9 years (range, 0.7-12.2 years) for patients with secondary AEFs. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 18.8%. One intraoperative death and one in-hospital death secondary to multisystem organ failure occurred in patients undergoing open repair. One in-hospital death related to persistent sepsis occurred in the endovascular group. The overall perioperative complication rate was 50.0%. Complications in the open group included sepsis, renal failure, bowel obstruction, and pancreatitis. Complications in the endovascular group were related to persistent sepsis. The mean in-hospital length of stay was significantly longer for patients undergoing open repair compared with endovascular repair (44.0 vs 19.4 days; P = .04). Four (80%) of five patients who were discharged from the hospital in the open group were placed in skilled nursing facilities, and seven (87.5%) of eight patients discharged in the endovascular group returned home. The median overall survival after hospital discharge was 23.1 months. There were no late aneurysm-related deaths or late deaths related to septic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AEFs have limited overall survival. Endovascular therapy offers an alternative to open surgical repair, seems to be associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality and a shorter in-hospital stay, and allows for acceptable survival given the presence of coexisting medical comorbidities. Furthermore, endovascular repair provides a therapeutic option to control bleeding and allow for continued intervention in a stabilized setting.

Aortoenteric fistula as a late complication of thrombolysis and bare metal stenting for perioperative occlusion of aortofemoral bypass

We previously described the case of a 47-year-old man who experienced perioperative graft occlusion after infrarenal aortic endarterectomy and aortobifemoral expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass graft for occlusive disease. The patient was treated with local graft thrombolysis and stenting of an intimal flap at the level of the endarterectomized aorta next to the aortic anastomosis. An urgent laparotomy performed 6 years later showed aortic wall perforation by the stent with a large aortoenteric fistula. Surgical treatment included removal of the stent and the aortobifemoral graft, bowel repair, and extra-anatomic lower-limb revascularization by axillofemoral and cross-femoral bypass grafting. The patient was discharged 12 days later with no early complications. Although local thrombolysis and stenting may be a technically feasible technique instead of reoperation in early aortofemoral graft thrombosis, long-term results of this procedure may be affected by perigraft hematoma due to perioperative thrombolysis, increased risk of infection due to the prolonged intragraft cannulation, and risk of stent-related aortic injury, especially if an endarterectomy has been performed. All these issues may increase the risk of late aortoenteric fistula. More experience with hybrid, open/endovascular procedures, and more contemporary stent-based devices is needed to assess the efficacy and safety of this alternative treatment.

Aortoenteric Fistula After Endovascular Stent Grafting for an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Report of a Case

We report a case of an aortoenteric fistula (AEF) developing after endovascular stent grafting (EVSG) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). A 69-year-old male patient with a history of panperitonitis caused by rectal perforation underwent EVSG for an AAA. A follow-up contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan, done 12 months after the EVSG, confirmed shrinkage of the AAA with no endoleak. However, 19 months postoperatively, an AEF developed between the AAA and the jejunum. Although there was no endoleak on a subsequent CT scan, we noted enlargement of the AAA and inflammatory changes in the surrounding tissue. The patient was treated surgically and discharged in good health 74 days postoperatively. Thus, one should consider the possibility of this devastating complication, even in patients without an endoleak, after EVSG for AAA.

Neoaortic Reconstruction for Aortic Graft Infection: Need for Endovascular Adjunctive Therapies?

Neoaortic reconstruction using an autogenous conduit is an increasingly accepted option for the management of aortic graft infections. However, this approach is not without technical challenges and potential graft-related problems, some of which can be solved with endovascular techniques. All patients who underwent neoaortic reconstruction with femoral-popliteal vein for aortic graft infection over a 6-year period were identified from the operative registry. Those patients requiring endovascular adjunctive therapies form the basis of this report. Of 17 cases of neoaortic reconstruction for aortic graft infection, five (29%) required endovascular adjunctive procedures. These included stent placement for graft stenosis (n = 3), stent graft placement for proximal anastomotic stenosis (n = 1), and stent graft placement for anastomotic disruption (n = 1). While two of these procedures occurred within 30 days of the original neoaortic reconstruction, three were required during late follow-up. Although there were no direct complications related to the endovascular procedures, the patient with anastomotic disruption died within 30 days of causes unrelated to the endovascular procedure. Primary patency of neoaortic reconstruction was 87% at 30 days and 61% at 3 years, with assisted primary patency increasing to 100% at 3 years after endovascular adjunctive intervention. While neoaortic reconstruction using an autogenous conduit for aortic graft infection has proven durability, it is not without potential early and late graft complications. When graft problems occur, endovascular options are an attractive alternative to reoperative open aortic procedures, especially in the setting of a vastly altered surgical field.

Complications of major aortic and lower extremity vascular surgery

Atheromatous disease and invasive intervention of the aortoiliac and distal arteries are common. Morbidity and mortality have been reduced through understanding and management of patient risk factors. Complications of this form of treatment affect all organ systems; mortality is most frequently caused by a cardiovascular complication (eg, myocardial infarction). Infection, leading to aortoenteric fistula is a dreaded complication, and paraplegia, though rare, is a devastating outcome. Multiorgan failure and death may result from a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Vascular surgery for infrainguinal disease also has a significant cardiovascular complication rate. Resulting complications may affect all organs; loss of an extremity may occur. The first part of this article reviews perioperative and postoperative complications of open aortic repair and lower-extremity revascularization and addresses the issue of regional anesthesia for major vascular surgery. The second part reviews endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). EVAR is a new intervention that combines surgery and radiology. Complications of EVAR are similar to open repair, but early results suggest they may be less frequent. New technology leads to new complications; endoleaks, migration of the endoprosthesis, and surgical conversion are unique to EVAR. The benefits of EVAR may be less blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and less cardiovascular stress; the risks may be aneurysm recurrence, prolonged surveillance and repeated secondary procedures. The development of EVAR, the complications, and the anesthesia-related concerns of EVAR, including its use in management of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm are reviewed.

Aortoesophageal fistula secondary to stent-graft repair of the thoracic aorta

PURPOSE

To report the incidence and management of aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) secondary to endovascular stent-graft repair of the descending thoracic aorta.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated at our facility between July 1999 and June 2003. During this interval, 60 patients (46 men; average age 66+/-10 years) underwent thoracic aortic stent-graft placement for a variety of pathologies.

RESULTS

AEF occurred in 3 (5%) patients. One 62-year-old man presented with recurrent back pain and fever and died suddenly due to fatal exsanguination; the AEF was revealed at necropsy. The other 2 patients (both women) presented with hematemesis after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. AEF was detected by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Both patients were treated conservatively, as open surgical repair was refused because of their general condition. Both patients developed severe mediastinitis and died after 5 weeks and 10 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortoesophageal fistula is, in our experience, a catastrophic complication of endovascular stent-graft placement. Treatment options are very limited, as these patients are usually not candidates for open surgery. Outcome under conservative management is, however, almost invariably fatal.