Resource utilization and outcomes: effect of transfer on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records.

RESULTS

We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.

Effect of after-hours presentation in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) are surgical emergencies that require immediate and expert treatment. It has been unclear whether presentation during evenings and weekends, when "on call" teams are primarily responsible for patient care, is associated with worse outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes of patients presenting with RAAAs after-hours vs during the workday.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all RAAAs in Nova Scotia between 2005 and 2015 was performed through linkage of administrative databases. Patients who had presented to the hospital with RAAAs during the workday (Monday through Friday, 6 am to 6 pm) were compared with those who had presented after-hours (6 pm to 6 am during the week and on weekends). The baseline and operative characteristics were identified for all patients through the available databases and a review of the medical records. Mortality before surgery, 30-day mortality, and operative mortality were compared between groups using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for factors clinically significant on univariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 390 patients with RAAAs were identified from 2005 to 2015, of whom 205 (53%) had presented during the workday and 185 (47%) after-hours. The overall chance of survival (OCS) was 45% overall, 49% if admitted to hospital, and 64% if surgery had been performed. During the workday, the OCS was 43% overall, 48% if admitted to hospital, and 67% if surgery had been performed. After-hours, the OCS was 46% overall, 49% if admitted to hospital, and 61% if surgery had been performed. Mortality before surgery was increased for patients who had presented to the hospital during the workday compared with after-hours (36% vs 26%; P = .04). The 30-day mortality (57% vs 54%; P = .62), rates of operative management (63% vs 72%; P = .06), and operative mortality (33% vs 39%; P = .33) were similar between the workday and after-hours groups (57% vs 54%; P = .06). After adjusting for significant clinical variables, the patients who had presented with RAAAs after-hours had had a similar odds of dying before surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.03), operative management (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.93-2.31), 30-day mortality (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.63-1.51), and operative mortality (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.78-2.26). In the subgroup of patients presenting to a hospital with endovascular capabilities, patients presenting after-hours had had similar odds of 30-day mortality (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.57-2.02), and operative mortality (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.58-2.23).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients presenting to the hospital with RAAAs after-hours did not have increased adjusted odds of mortality before surgery, operative management, 30-day mortality, or operative mortality.

Dying to Get There: Patients Who Reside at Increased Distance from Tertiary Center Experience Increased Mortality Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture

BACKGROUND

Centralization of vascular surgery care for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (RAAAs) to high-volume tertiary centers may hinder access to timely surgical intervention for patients in remote areas. The objective of this study was to determine the association between distance from vascular care and mortality from RAAAs in the province of Nova Scotia, Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all RAAAs in Nova Scotia between 2005 and 2015 was performed through linkage of administrative databases. Patients were divided into groups by estimated travel time from their place of residence to the tertiary center (<1 hr and ≥1 hr) using geographic information software. Baseline and operative characteristics were identified for all patients through available databases and completed through chart review. Mortality at home, during transfer to the vascular center, and overall 30-day mortality were compared between groups using t-test and chi-squared test, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the independent effect of travel time on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 567 patients with RAAA were identified from 2005-2015, of which 250 (44%) resided <1 hr travel time to the tertiary center and 317 (56%) resided ≥1 hr. On multivariable analysis, travel time ≥1 hr from vascular care was an independent predictor of mortality at home (odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.63, P = 0.02), mortality prior to operation (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.81-3.83, P < 0.001), and overall 30-day mortality (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.10-2.37, P = 0.02). In patients who received an operation (n = 294), there was no association between increased travel time and mortality (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60-1.73, P = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Travel time ≥1 hr to the tertiary center is associated with significantly higher mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, there was no difference in overall chance of survival between groups for patients that underwent AAA repair. Therefore, strategies to facilitate early detection, and timely transfer to a vascular surgery center may improve outcomes for patients with RAAA.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Transferred for Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Patients requiring emergent vascular surgery often undergo transfer from one facility to another for definitive surgical care. In this study, we analyzed morbidity and mortality in patients presenting for emergent lower extremity thrombectomy and embolectomy in the transferred and non-transferred populations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for all non-elective, emergent lower extremity embolectomy or thrombectomy (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 34201 and 34203) performed between 2011-2014. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complications and outcomes were compared among patients presenting from home versus those presenting from another hospital, emergency department, or nursing home. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the association between mode of presentation, major complications, and death.

RESULTS

We identified 1954 patients who underwent emergent lower extremity embolectomy or thrombectomy. 40.7% (795 patients) were identified as transfer patients. Odds of transfer were significantly increased if a patient was functionally dependent (OR 1.95, p <0.001) or had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 1.348, p = 0.05). Odds of transfer were decreased if a patient was of a non-white race (OR 0.511, p <0.001). 11.7% (229) patients in the described cohort died within 30 days of surgery. Those who died were more likely to present to the treating hospital as a transfer (56.3% versus 38.6%, p <0.001). In multivariate analysis, transfer status was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (OR 1.9: 95% CI 1.40-2.64; p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients transferred from an outside hospital or nursing home who present for emergent vascular procedures demonstrated increased mortality compared to those who present from home direct to the emergency department despite similar comorbid conditions. In addition, race was identified as an independent factor for transfer. Further studies are needed to understand the complex interactions between inter-hospital transfer patterns, emergency vascular surgery presentations, and racial biases to improve outcomes for this population.

In-hospital outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: A single center experience

Introduction: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) is a catastrophic condition with in-hospital mortalities up to 89%. Patient survival depends on multiple factors; however, prompt surgery is essential to prevent mortality. We report the in-hospital outcomes of RAAA at a high-volume and teaching vascular surgery center in Iran.

Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infrarenal RAAA during February 20, 2012 to December 21, 2019 at Shohada-Tajrish Medical Center, Tehran,Iran. We identified 66 patients with RAAA during the study period. The patients were dividedinto two groups based on their transfer status (Transfer group versus non-transfer group). The primary outcome was in-hospital death. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI), abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and postoperative renal dysfunction requiring dialysis.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 74.2 ± 8.3 years. Forty-seven patients (71.2%) were transferred to our center from other institutions. There were 46 in-hospital deaths (69.7%) and three in-hospital MIs (4.5%). Three patients (4.5%) had postoperative ACS and six patients (9.1%)had postoperative renal dysfunction requiring dialysis. Transfer patients had an increased rate of in-hospital death compared to non-transferred patients (76.6.1% versus 52.6%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P =0.055).

Conclusion: We found no significant different between operative mortality of transferred and non-transferred RAAA patients. Transfer of patients to tertiary centers with experienced vascular surgeons may delay the surgery. However, the transfer may be inevitable in areas where the optimal care of RAAA patients is not possible.

Impact of Inter-Hospital Transfer on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Tertiary Referral Center's Perspective

BACKGROUND

In trauma patients, the impact of inter-hospital transfer has been widely studied. However, for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery (EAS), the effect of inter-hospital transfer on outcomes is largely unknown.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective observational study. Outcomes of transferred patients undergoing EAS were compared to patients primarily admitted to a tertiary care hospital from 01/2016 to 12/2018 using univariable and multivariable analyses. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Some 973 patients with a median (IQR) age of 58.1 (39.4-72.2) years and a median body mass index of 25.8 (22.5-29.3) kg/m² were included. The transfer group comprised 258 (26.3%) individuals and the non-transfer group 715 (72.7%). The population was stratified in three subgroups: (1) patients with low surgical stress (n = 483, 49.6%), (2) with hollow viscus perforation (n = 188, 19.3%) and (3) with potential bowel ischemia (n = 302, 31.1%). Neither in the low surgical stress nor in the hollow viscus perforation group was the transfer status associated with mortality. However, in the potential bowel ischemia group inter-hospital transfer was a predictor for mortality (OR 3.54, 95%CI 1.03-12.12, p = 0.045). Moreover, in the hollow viscus perforation group inter-hospital transfer was a predictor for reduced hospital length of stay (RC -10.02, 95%CI -18.14/-1.90, p = 0.016) and reduced severe complications (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.18-0.77, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Other than in patients with low surgical stress or hollow viscus perforation, in patients with potential bowel ischemia inter-hospital transfer was an independent predictor for higher mortality. Taking into account the time sensitiveness of bowel ischemia, efforts should be made to avoid inter-hospital transfer in this vulnerable subgroup of patients.

The Association Between Admission Sources and Outcomes at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives In this study, we aimed to examine the association between sources of admission (either intra-hospital transfers or ED admissions) in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and the discharge rate, mortality rate, and referral over a period of three years. We also sought to identify the independent predictors of discharge and mortality rate in the study population. Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study involving the analysis of 2,547 patients' data collected from the Pediatric Intensive Care Registry of a secondary care community hospital. We included patients admitted to the PICU from January 1, 2016, till December 31, 2018, who were aged 0-14 years with a specific diagnosis, recorded source of admission, and clear outcome. Data were collected, coded, and analyzed using the SPSS Statistics software (IBM, Armonk, NY) and STATA software (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results Of the included patients, 1,356 (53.2%) were males, and 1,191 (46.8%) were females. Infants were associated with an increased risk of a long stay in the hospital [relative risk ratio (RRR)=5.34, 95% CI: (1.28, 22.27)] and mortality [RRR=3.56, 95% CI: (1.41, 8.95)] compared to older children. Similarly, neonates were associated with a higher risk of mortality [RRR=2.83, 95% CI: (1.05, 7.65)]. Patients who were admitted through ED were associated with a lower risk of a long-stay [RRR=0.56, 95% CI: (10.36, 0.87)] and mortality [RRR=0.68, 95% CI: (0.49, 0.95)] compared to intra-hospital transfers. Concerning the admission date, all time periods were associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to the period of October-December. Conclusion Our findings showed that the age of patients, source of admission, and date of admission might be used as independent predictors for determining the outcome of admissions, including discharge and mortality rates. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Early outcomes of patients transferred with ruptured suprarenal aneurysm or dissection

Objective Despite centralisation of the provision of vascular care, not all areas in England and Wales are able to offer emergency treatment for patients with acute conditions affecting the aorta proximal to the renal arteries. While cardiothoracic centres have made network arrangements to coordinate care for the repair of type A dissections, a similar plan for vascular care is lacking. This study investigates early outcomes in patients with ruptured suprarenal aortic aneurysm or dissection (rSRAD) transferred to a specialist centre. Methods Retrospective observational study over a five-year period (2009-2014) assessing outcomes of patients with ruptured sRAD diagnosed at their local hospital and then transferred to a tertiary centre capable of offering such treatment. Results Fifty-two patients (median age 73 years, 32 male) with rSRAD were transferred and a further four died during transit. The mean distance of patient transfer was 35 miles (range 4-211 miles). One patient did not undergo intervention due to frailty and two died before reaching the operating theatre. A total of 23 patients underwent endovascular repair, 9 hybrid repair and 17 open surgery. Median follow-up was 12 months (range 1-43 months). Complications included paraplegia (n = 3), stroke (n = 2), type IA endoleak (n = 4); 30-day and in-hospital mortality were 16% and 27%. For patients discharged alive from hospital, one-year survival was 67%. Conclusions Although the number of patients with rSRAD is low and those who are transferred alive are a self-selecting group, this study suggests that transfer of such patients to a specialist vascular centre is associated with acceptable mortality rates following emergency complex aortic repair.

Emergency endovascular management of acute thoracic aortic pathology A safe and feasible option

Endovascular repair has revolutionised the emergency treatment of thoracic aortic disease. We report our 10 year experience using this treatment in emergency cases. A prospectively maintained vascular database was analysed. Patients' medical records and CT images stored on the hospital PACS system were also reviewed. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS V21. There were a total of 59 thoracic aortic stenting procedures of which 33 (60% males with a mean age of 58 yrs) were performed for emergency thoracic pathologies: traumatic transection (n = 10), ruptured aneurysm (n = 6), non-traumatic dissection (n = 8) and penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 9). All patients had self-expanding endografts implanted. Two patients required debranching procedures before the endovascular treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 12.1% (4/33). 70% of patients received a single device. There were 7 procedure related complications, 6 requiring re-intervention: thoracotomy and drainage in 2 patients, proximal graft extension in 2, open drainage of groin haematoma in 1 and open repair of a common femoral artery pseudo-aneurysm in one patient. In total 23 patients were transferred from 11 centres nationwide. There were no mortalities or other complications related to patient transfer from peripheral centres. Although acute thoracic aortic pathology is life threatening, appropriate blood pressure management and treatment of associated injuries can result in favourable outcomes. Endovascular repair is a safe and effective treatment option which enables patients to be treated with reduced morbidity and mortality. Transfer of patients with acute pathology to a tertiary centre can safely be performed.

Ambulance smartphone tool for field triage of ruptured aortic aneurysms (FILTR): study protocol for a prospective observational validation of diagnostic accuracy

INTRODUCTION

Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) carries a considerable mortality rate and is often fatal. rAAA can be treated through open or endovascular surgical intervention and it is possible that more rapid access to definitive intervention might be a key aspect of improving mortality for rAAA. Diagnosis is not always straightforward with up to 42% of rAAA initially misdiagnosed, introducing potentially harmful delay. There is a need for an effective clinical decision support tool for accurate prehospital diagnosis and triage to enable transfer to an appropriate centre.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Prospective multicentre observational study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a prehospital smartphone triage tool for detection of rAAA. The study will be conducted across London in conjunction with London Ambulance Service (LAS). A logistic score predicting the risk of rAAA by assessing ten key parameters was developed and retrospectively validated through logistic regression analysis of ambulance records and Hospital Episode Statistics data for 2200 patients from 2005 to 2010. The triage tool is integrated into a secure mobile app for major smartphone platforms. Key parameters collected from the app will be retrospectively matched with final hospital discharge diagnosis for each patient encounter. The primary outcome is to assess the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the rAAA triage tool logistic score in prospective use as a mob app for prehospital ambulance clinicians. Data collection started in November 2014 and the study will recruit a minimum of 1150 non-consecutive patients over a time period of 2 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Full ethical approval has been gained for this study. The results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, and international/national presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CPMS 16459; pre-results.

Outcomes of regional transfers of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a UK vascular network

INTRODUCTION Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a surgical emergency. In order to improve operative outcomes, vascular services have been centralised in the United Kingdom. This means that a patient may present to a hospital with a ruptured aneurysm, but require transfer to a vascular centre for definitive treatment. METHODS This retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a tertiary vascular centre over a 2-year period. Data on demographics and originating unit were recorded. Outcomes assessed included 30-day mortality, operative mortality and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS We identified 70 patients who underwent surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the 2-year period; 36 presented directly to the vascular unit (VU), 14 to referral unit 1 (RU1) and 20 to referral unit 2 (RU2); 30-day mortality rates were 27.7% (VU), 35.5% (RU1) and 30.0% (RU2), respectively. There was no statistical difference in mortality between units. Postoperative complications were seen in 35.9% of VU patients, 78.6% of RU1 patients and 70% of RU2 patients. This was statistically significant between VU and RU1 (P = 0.006) and VU and RU2 (P = 0.02). Direct operative complications were seen in 9 patients, gastrointestinal complications in 9, limb complications in 6 and systemic complications in 40. CONCLUSION This study found that site of presentation does not affect mortality but is associated with increased morbidity. This is a complex issue, which will require a prospective multicentre study to investigate further.

Resident and fellow experiences after the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed trends in open and endovascular repair (EVAR) of intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the Medicare population and evaluated recent trends in AAA repair at vascular fellowship training programs.

METHODS

We identified all Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of AAA who underwent repair or had a primary diagnosis of rupture (1995-2008). Cohorts were compared by type of repair (open vs EVAR) and presentation (intact vs ruptured AAA). Demographics of age, sex, and race were evaluated. We used unique hospital identifier codes to compare trends and 30-day mortality between hospitals that participate in vascular surgery fellowship training and those that do not. American Council on Graduate Medical Education data, only available for the years 1999 to 2008, were further used to better understand the changes in number of EVAR and open repairs of AAA performed each year for vascular fellows and general surgery residents, over time.

RESULTS

We identified 449,122 patients (76% men), with 376,355 intact AAAs (84%) and 72,767 ruptured AAAs (16%). Mean age was 75.1 years. Use of EVAR for intact AAA rose to from 35% in 2001 to 63% in 2005 and comprised 78% of repairs by 2008. During the same period, the number of ruptured AAAs decreased by 40% overall, with nonoperative ruptured AAAs decreasing by 29% and EVAR increasing to 31% of rupture repairs. Hospitals training vascular fellows were quicker to adopt EVAR (2-year lag time) for intact AAA and had higher rates of EVAR for ruptured AAA (41.1% vs 29.2%; P = .001) than did hospitals without fellows. Mortality rates for open repairs of intact (4.0% vs 5.0%; P = .01) and ruptured AAA (34.1% vs 41.0%; P = .031) were lower at fellowship hospitals. The average number of open AAA repairs performed by vascular fellows dropped 50% (44.1 to 21.6/year) from 1999 to 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to the expectation of a plateau, use of EVAR for intact AAA continues to rise at fellowship and nonfellowship hospitals. Use of EVAR for rupture is being used more often at fellowship programs. The decline in open repairs performed by vascular fellows, and at fellowship and non-fellowship hospitals, may have important implications for future attending experience.

Outcomes before and after initiation of an acute aortic treatment center

BACKGROUND

Acute aortic syndromes remain life-threatening. Time is of the essence, as mortality rises with increasing time after the acute episode. The aim of this report is to show changes in practice and outcomes after the establishment of an acute aortic treatment center (AATC) to expedite the care of acute aortic syndromes in a major metropolitan area with the belief that "door to intervention time under 90 minutes" reduces mortality and morbidity from acute aortic disease.

METHODS

A database of patients admitted with acute aortic disease (Type A and B aortic dissections, acute thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms, acute and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms) for 1 year prior to initiation (2007) and 1 year after initiation of the pathway (AATC) in 2008 was developed. Comorbidities were scored according to Society of Vascular Surgery criteria. Anatomic and functional outcomes were determined and categorized by Society of Vascular Surgery reporting criteria. Multivariate analysis was performed for categorical outcomes and Cox proportional hazard analyses for time-dependent outcomes.

RESULTS

Six hundred twenty-one patients reported with aortic disease to the cardiovascular services; 306 patients were considered to have acute disease. When compared with the year before the AATC was instituted, there was a 30% increase in the total number of admissions and a 25% increase in acute pathology after setting up the AATC (P = .02). There was a two-fold increase in thoracic aortic dissections admitted to the service. Initiation of the treatment pathway resulted in a highly significant 64% reduction in time to definitive therapy (526 ± 557 vs 187 ± 258 minutes, mean ± SD pre-AATC vs AATC; P = .0001). Comorbidity scores were equivalent between the two cohorts. Despite the increase in acuity, mortality (4% vs 6%) and morbidity (41% vs 45%) rates were unchanged, and there was a significant decrease in intensive care unit length of stay (5 vs 4 days, pre-AATC cohort vs the AATC cohort), but total hospital length of stay (11 vs 10 days) was unchanged. There was no correlation between deaths within 30 days and length of stay in the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

Establishment of a multidisciplinary AATC pathway was associated with a 30% increase in volume, 64% reduction in time to definitive treatment, improved throughput with reduced intensive care unit time, and maintained clinical efficacy despite an increase in acute admissions. These results suggest the concept be further evaluated.

Advantage of a one-stop referral and management service for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Background

In 2005, 4003 deaths in England and Wales were attributed to ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). This study examined the referral and management patterns of this condition within one English county.

Methods

West Sussex has a population of 811 000 and is served by five hospitals with two main vascular networks. Between January 2005 and December 2007, data for community and in-hospital RAAA interventions and deaths were obtained. Probability of intervention and outcome for each network were calculated.

Results

Of 341 RAAA, 228 (66·9 per cent) presented to hospital. The mean distance travelled to hospitals with a full on-site vascular service was 17·6 (95 per cent confidence interval 15·5 to 19·7) km (124 patients) compared with 11·0 (9·5 to 12·7) km (104 patients) to hospitals with a partial or no vascular service (P &lt; 0·001). Patients managed by the network with a one-stop RAAA management policy had an odds ratio of 2·4 for undergoing surgery and 2·5 for surviving the operation (P = 0·001 and P = 0·017 respectively).

Conclusion

Patients with RAAA should be offered a one-stop emergency vascular service even if this involves further travel. Such a strategy offers significantly higher chance of intervention and survival from ruptured AAA.

Effect of Patient Transfer on Outcomes after Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) benefit from treatment in high-volume facilities. This study explored the effect of patient transfer on outcomes and the relationship between hemodynamic status and mortality. We performed a retrospective review of 83 consecutive patients who had open repair for RAAA at a single tertiary facility. The patients were divided into two groups based on arrival in the local emergency department, “local” ( n = 44) versus “transfer” ( n = 39) from an outside institution, and into three categories of hemodynamic status: (a) no obtainable blood pressure, “pulseless”; (b) requiring vasopressor support, “pressors”; and (c) no vasopressor support, “no pressors.” Thirty-day mortality was 21.4%. There was no difference in mortality between the local (18.2%) and transfer (25.6%) patients ( p = .41). There were no deaths during transfer. There was no difference in the hemodynamic status of the transfer versus the local group ( p = .34). The mortality by category was pulseless, 100% (3 of 3); pressors, 71.4% (10 of 14); and no pressors, 7.6% (5 of 66) ( p < .0001). Actuarial survival was 66%, 64%, and 62% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Patient transfer does not adversely affect mortality after RAAA repair. Patients without a palpable pulse and those requiring hemodynamic support have a significantly higher mortality.

Has the Implementation of EVAR for Ruptured AAA Improved Outcomes?

Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). However, these data may not be generalizable to all regions.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2001-2005) using state inpatient data.

Results: 5,176 patients underwent repair of AAA. 700 repairs were performed for rAAA (618 [88%] with open surgery (OS) and 82 [12%] with EVAR). Mortality for rAAA was similar for EVAR and OS (45.1% vs. 52.4%, P = 0.21). Lack of insurance (OR = 5.1; 95%CI: 1.7-15.2) was a predictor of mortality. Cost of repair for rAAA was greater for EVAR ($51,339 ± 51,719 vs. $39,967 ± 43,354, P = 0.03) and hospital LOS was similar (14.08 ± 17.97 vs.13.42 ± 18.18; P = 0.8). Conclusion: EVAR did not offer a survival benefit in the state, had a similar hospital LOS, and was significantly more expensive. Further evaluation exploring explanations for inferior outcomes by region are required as EVAR becomes more commonly implemented for rAAA.

Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Community Practice: Age and Operative Variables Predict Survival

Our objective is to determine if the mortality and functional outcome of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms treated at community hospitals is more a function of patient factors and comorbidities or hospital system and surgeon-controlled variables. We used a retrospective review of all patients with infrarenal ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms treated at three large community hospitals in Chicago from 1996 to 2005. There was an overall 58 per cent mortality rate. There was a statistically significant difference in the age of those who lived (69 ± 9.8) and those who died (78 ± 7.9, P = 0.0005). Mortality was found to increase with each increasing decade of life. None of the patients from age 50 to 60 died, whereas 44 per cent of the patients from 61 to 70, 65 per cent of those 71 to 80, 64 per cent of those 81 to 90, and 100 per cent of those older than 90 died. There was an increased hazard ratio of 10.9 times the risk of mortality once a patient became older than age 70 (P = 0.02). Intra-operative variables did influence survival: duration of surgery (lived 230 ± 78 minutes, died 324 ± 130 minutes, P = 0.006), intra-operative blood loss (lived 1894 ± 1014 mL, died 5692 ± 3018 mL, P = 0.00003), and blood transfusion (lived 6.7 ± 2.8 units, died 10.5 ± 3.7 units, P = 0.0006). Age and intra-operative factors play a major role in the survival or mortality of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Short operative time combined with minimizing blood loss and transfusion requirements improve survival, especially in the elderly.

Validity of the Hardman Index to Predict Outcome in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

This study assessed the validity of the Hardman index in predicting outcome following open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and whether this scoring system can be used reliably to select patients for surgical repair. Patients undergoing open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in two university teaching hospitals over a 5-year period were identified from a computerized hospital database. Thirty-day mortality was the main outcome measure. Five Hardman index factors were calculated and related to outcome retrospectively. There were 178 patients with a mean age of 73.9 years (range 51-94) and a male to female ratio of 5.4:1. The overall in-hospital mortality was 57.3% (102/178). Univariate analysis of risk factors showed that age >76 years (P = 0.007, odds ratio [OR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-4.37) and electrocardiograghic evidence of ischemia on admission (P = 0.002, OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.57-8.93) were associated with high mortality. However, loss of consciousness (P = 0.155, OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.85-2.86), hemoglobin <9 g/dL (P = 0.118, OR 1.89, 95% CI 0.85-4.22), and serum creatinine >0.19 mmol/L (P = 0.691, OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.42-3.70) were not significant predictors of mortality. Using a multivariate analysis, age >76 years (P = 0.043, OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.03-5.11) and myocardial ischemia (P = 0.029, OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.12-7.67) were again found to be the significant predictors of mortality. The operative mortality was 44%, 46%, 68%, 79%, and 100% for Hardman scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. No patient had a score of 5. The Hardman index is not a reliable predictor of outcome following repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. High-risk patients may still survive and should not be denied surgical repair based on the scoring system alone. Further evaluation of the risk factors is required to reliably and justifiably exclude those patients in whom the intervention is inappropriate.