The Endowedge and Kilt Techniques to Achieve Additional Juxtarenal Seal during Deployment of the Gore Excluder Endoprosthesis

Midterm outcomes of endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm using the cuff-first technique to prevent type II endoleaks

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the initial and midterm outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using the cuff-first technique (CFT) to prevent type II endoleak (T2EL).

METHODS

CFT involves deploying an aortic cuff inside the AAA to cover the ostium of the aortic side branch vessels before deploying the main body. We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing EVAR with CFT or side branch embolization (SBE) for AAAs at The Jikei University Hospital between 2016 and 2022. Primary endpoint was the rate of aneurysm sac shrinkage. Secondary endpoints were procedure time, radiation exposure, technical and clinical success rates, occurrence of T2EL, and freedom from reintervention or aneurysm-related death.

RESULTS

Of 406 patients who underwent EVAR for AAAs, CFT was utilized in 56 (CFT group) and SBE in 35 (SBE group); all 91 patients were included in this study. There were no differences in patient demographics between groups, but there were differences in patency rate of the inferior mesenteric artery and absent intraluminal thrombus. The technical success rate per target vessel in the CFT and SBE group was 97.8% and 91.8%, and the clinical success rate was 91.0% and 100%, respectively. The median procedure time was shorter for CFT than for SBE: CFT, 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 6-14) minutes vs SBE, 25 (IQR, 18.5-45) minutes; P < .05), and median radiation exposure was lower for CFT than for SBE (CFT, 1455 (IQR, 840-2634) mGy vs SBE, 2353 (IQR, 1552-3586) mGy; P < .05). During the median follow-up of 25 months (IQR, 12.5-47 months), sac shrinkage occurred at similar rates in both groups (CFT, 37.5% vs SBE, 40.0%; P = .812), and there were no differences in freedom from reintervention (CFT, 96.2% and 91.4% at 12 and 36 months vs SBE, 100% and 89.5% at 12 and 36 months; log-rank P = .761) and freedom from aneurysm-related death (100% at 36 months in both groups; log-rank P = .440). The odds ratio of CFT vs SBE for sac regression was calculated by adjusting for inferior mesenteric artery patency and absent intraluminal thrombus, resulting in no statistical significance (odds ratio, 1.231; 95% confidence interval, 0.486-3.122).

CONCLUSIONS

CFT is feasible with a shorter procedure time and lower radiation exposure than SBE and comparable mid-term outcomes, including sac shrinkage rate, compared with SBE. We believe that CFT, if anatomically suitable, is an alternative to SBE for the prevention of T2EL during EVAR.

Early- and Mid-Term Results of Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using an Aortic Cuff Prior to the Main Body to Prevent Type II Endoleaks

PURPOSE

Postoperatively persistent type II endoleaks (T2ELs) in abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are known risk factors for long-term aneurysm enlargement. Therefore, various measures have been proposed to prevent T2ELs. Notably, the Kilt technique, which can be used in patients with dumbbell-shaped morphology, employs an aortic cuff deployed in the distal seal zone before the main body. Although previous studies have successfully applied this technique for preventing T2ELs, the mid- and long-term outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to report the early- to mid-term outcomes in cases where an aortic cuff technique was used to prevent T2ELs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study analyzed 9 patients (mean age, 79 years; range, 69-88 years; 8 men) with abdominal aortic aneurysms. All patients underwent EVAR using an aortic cuff to prevent T2ELs. The primary end points were technical success (successful deployment) and clinical success (no T2ELs). Secondary end points included morbidity, reintervention, and aortic remodeling during follow-up.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. There were no intraprocedural or postoperative complications. No deaths or reinterventions occurred. Postoperative computed tomography showed no endoleaks in 6 patients, while T2ELs from the lumbar artery outside the aortic cuff deployment range were noted in 3 patients. However, no T2ELs were observed in the artery in the aortic cuff deployment range in any patient. The average number of successfully occluded arteries was 4.2 (range, 2-8). All patients had follow-up >6 (mean, 18.6; range, 6-36) months. Aneurysm sac shrinkage occurred in 5 patients during the follow-up period, whereas aneurysm size was stable in 3 patients. In contrast, only 1 patient showed transient dilation of the aneurysm sac enlargement; however, this dilation remained unchanged even after 1.5 years.

CONCLUSION

The aortic cuff technique is a favorable endovascular method for preventing T2ELs in EVAR. The present study showed that a single aortic cuff could easily and reliably occlude arteries branched from the aneurysm sac.

Funnel technique for wide infrarenal aneurysm neck with Lifetech Ankura™ Stent Graft System

Background

In this study, we present our mid-term results in patients undergoing treatment with the funnel technique and describe technical issues for this bailout technique in extra-wide infrarenal necks.

Methods

Between January 2018 and June 2020, a total of seven male, symptomatic patients (median: 74.5 years; range, 64 to 84 years) who had comorbidities and were in the American Society for Anesthesiologists Class IV and treated by the funnel technique in an endovascular fashion were included. Pre- and post-procedural data of the patients, early mortality and technical success rates were evaluated.

Results

There was no early mortality. Technical success rate was 100%. There was no type I or III endoleaks at the completion angiography. All patients were discharged without any problem on the second or third day of the procedure. The median follow-up was 13 (range, 6 to 28) months. The aneurysm sac shrinkage was achieved in all patients over six months of follow up. During the follow-up period, no proximal endoleak or infrarenal aortic neck diameter enlargement was found.

Conclusion

Based on our limited experience, the funnel technique may be considered more than a bailout procedure under special circumstances.

Adjunctive Procedures for Challenging Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Repair: When Needed and How Effective?

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is now considered the first choice treatment modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment. Advocates for endovascular strategies will try to treat all AAA by EVAR, regardless if the anatomy is conducive for treatment or not. However, the long-term outcomes of EVAR outside the instructions for use (IFU) due to a hostile aneurysmal neck or iliac artery anatomy are known to be poor. The EVAR procedures can be classified according to the technical difficulty, IFU, and need for visceral revascularization: standard, adjunctive, and complex EVAR. The situation required for adjunctive procedures can be classified as the following four steps: a hostile neck (i.e., short or severely angled); large inferior mesenteric or lumbar artery; tough iliac artery anatomy, such as a short common iliac artery and stenotic external iliac artery; and limitations in vascular access. This article will discuss the adjunctive procedures to overcome hostile aneurysm neck and unsuitable iliac artery anatomy.

Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with the Kilt Technique for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Hostile Aneurysm Neck Anatomy: A Korean Multicenter Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and short-term clinical outcomes of Kilt technique-based endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with Seal^® stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with hostile neck anatomy (angle > 60°).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the pre-EVAR and follow-up computed tomography angiography findings of 24 patients (mean age 71 ± 11 years; age range 32-87 years; mean follow-up 50 ± 12 months) with hostile neck AAAs treated between 2010 and 2015. Serial change in aneurysmal neck angle was calculated using a standardized protocol. Relationships between clinical variables and outcomes were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses and mixed-model regression. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the cumulative rates of survival, endoleak, and reintervention.

RESULTS

The primary technical success rate (success within 24 h after EVAR) was 100% (24/24). The survival rate was 96 ± 8% at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, and 87 ± 18% at 5 years. Endoleaks occurred in three patients. Four reinterventions were performed in three patients; no surgical revisions were required. Causes of post-EVAR mortality included intracerebral hemorrhage at 14 days and rhabdomyolysis at 32 months. The most remarkable change after Kilt-based EVAR was an acute decrease in the neck angle, which was observed between the pre-EVAR and first follow-up visits (at 1 month) (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Kilt-based EVAR with Seal^® stent-grafts for AAAs with a severely angulated neck (angle > 60°) provided high technical success, low mortality, and low complication rates during short-term follow-up.

Kilt Technique as an Angle Modification Method for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Severe Neck Angle

PURPOSE

Kilt technique can be useful for overcoming the severe angle in endovascular abdominal aortic repair. Thus, we investigate the utility of the Kilt technique as an angle modification method.

METHODS

This study included 16 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm having severe neck angle (over 60°). Of these, eight were treated using Kilt technique, whereas the remaining eight were by the conventional endovascular method. We investigated the pre- and post-procedural differences in neck angle between the two groups using aortic computed tomography (CT) angiography.

RESULTS

Mean pre-procedural neck angles in the conventional group and the Kilt group were 70° ± 13° and 93° ± 14° (p = 0.007) and supra-renal neck angles were 54° ± 16° and 89° ± 26°, respectively (p = 0.016). However, the angle differences disappeared between the two groups after the procedure. Consequently, the Kilt group showed greater angle change than the conventional group (p value for ∆ supra-renal angle and ∆ neck angle were 0.015 and 0.021, respectively). There was no type 1 endoleak during 16 ± 16 months of CT follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Kilt technique may be an effective tool for modifying the neck angle without leaving increased risk of type 1 endoleak in this subset of patients.

Predeployed aortic extension cuff (kilt) in EVAR with hostile neck anatomy using Endurant II system: preliminary results

INTRODUCTION

Various modifications of standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) have been developed to solve the problem of difficult neck anatomy.

AIM

The authors propose the implantation of a predeployed extension cuff (kilt) using on-shelf Endurant II elements. In a vast majority of cases, the proposed method provides a solution for the hostile neck problem using standard Endurant II elements available in all centers performing subrenal EVAR procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The early outcomes of kilt implantation were evaluated in 11 patients (three with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, one symptomatic) in 2 vascular centers in Silesia (Poland). All patients presented with hostile neck anatomy defined as neck length < 10 mm, diameter > 28 mm, angulation > 60°, mural thrombus or calcium > 2 mm in thickness or > 180° circumference.

RESULTS

No intraoperative type I endoleak or device migration was observed. Two perioperative deaths occurred in patients in a severe condition with ruptured aneurysms. One case of type III endoleak was managed by the implantation of an additional iliac extension with complete endoleak sealing.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method seems to be effective in early endoleak prevention in patients with hostile neck anatomy undergoing EVAR procedures; however, studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes in endovascular versus open repair for juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysms: A propensity-matched analysis

Objective

Endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair is suitable within certain anatomic specifications. This study aims to compare 30-day outcomes of endovascular versus open repairs for juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysms (JAA/PAAs).

Methods

The ACS-NSQIP database was queried from 2012 to 2015 for JAA/PAA repairs. Procedures characterized as emergent were included in the study; however, failed prior repairs and ruptured aneurysms were excluded. The preoperative and perioperative patient characteristics, operative techniques, and outcome variables were compared between the open aortic repair and the endovascular aortic repair groups. Propensity scoring was performed to clinically match open aortic repair and endovascular aortic repair groups on preoperative risk and select perioperative factors that differed significantly in the unmatched groups. Outcome comparisons were then performed between matched groups.

Results

A total of 1005 (789 JAAs and 216 PAAs) aneurysm repairs were included in the study. Of these, there were 395 endovascular aortic repairs and 610 open aortic repairs. Propensity scoring created a matched group of 263 endovascular aortic repair and 263 open aortic repair patients. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality rates between matched endovascular aortic repair and open aortic repair patients (2.7% vs. 5.7%). The endovascular aortic repair group had a shorter ICU length of stay and overall hospital stay. The 30-day morbidity significantly favored endovascular aortic repair over open aortic repair (16% vs. 35%, p < 0.001). The main drivers of morbidity for endovascular aortic repair versus open aortic repair included return to the OR (6.8% vs. 15%, p < 0.001), rate of cardiac or respiratory failure (7.6% vs. 21%, p = 0.001), rate of renal insufficiency or failure (3.8% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.009), and rate of pneumonia (1.5% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

There is no difference in mortality rates between endovascular aortic repair versus open aortic repair when repairing JAAs/PAAs. There is a significant difference in overall morbidity, and ICU and hospital length of stay favoring endovascular aortic repair over open aortic repair. This supports the expanded applicability and efficacy of endovascular repair for complex aneurysms.

Advanced Endovascular Approaches in the Management of Challenging Proximal Aortic Neck Anatomy: Traditional Endografts and the Snorkel Technique

Advances in endovascular technology, and access to this technology, have significantly changed the field of vascular surgery. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), in which endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has replaced the traditional open surgical approach in patients with suitable anatomy. However, approximately one-third of patients presenting with AAAs are deemed ineligible for standard EVAR because of anatomic constraints, the majority of which involve the proximal aneurysmal neck. To overcome these challenges, a bevy of endovascular approaches have been developed to either enhance stent graft fixation at the proximal neck or extend the proximal landing zone to allow adequate apposition to the aortic wall and thus aneurysm exclusion. This article is composed of two sections that together address new endovascular approaches for treating aortic aneurysms with difficult proximal neck anatomy. The first section will explore advancements in the traditional EVAR approach for hostile neck anatomy that maximize the use of the native proximal landing zone; the second section will discuss a technique that was developed to extend the native proximal landing zone and maintain perfusion to vital aortic branches using common, off-the-shelf components: the snorkel technique. While the techniques presented differ in terms of approach, the available clinical data, albeit limited, support the notion that they may both have roles in the treatment algorithm for patients with challenging proximal neck anatomy.

Early experience with the endowedge technique and snorkel technique for endovascular aneurysm repair with challenging neck anatomy

OBJECTIVES

This study was evaluating the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the endowedge technique (EnT) and/or snorkel technique (SnT) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients treated with EnT and/or SnT were retrospectively reviewed between January 2010 and June 2013. All patients underwent EVAR under general anesthesia. Bilateral femoral arterial access was obtained through bilateral femoral cut-down to place the stent graft mainbody, and brachial arterial access was obtained percutaneously to perform the EnT and/or SnT.

RESULTS

Three patients were treated with unilateral EnT, 1 with unilateral SnT, two with bilateral SnT, and two with combined EnT/SnT. A total of 12 renal arteries was attempted to preserve, and could be successfully performed by these techniques in 11 renal arteries. After complete deployment of the endograft, intraoperative angiography showed no type Ia EL. During the median follow-up of 11 months (range: 2-22 months), no deaths nor aneurysm enlargement occurred, and all treated renal arteries were patent without further intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the management of AAAs by EVAR with EnT and/or SnT could achieve an adequate proximal seal, and preserve renal artery perfusion in patients with unfavorable neck anatomy.

Protocol-based strategy for endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Compared with conventional open surgery (COS), endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been reported to decrease the 30-day mortality rate in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). We developed an EVAR-first strategy for rAAAs that incorporates the Shonan ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm protocol (SRAP). We describe short-term results with this protocol at our institution and compare them with outcomes in patients who underwent COS.

METHODS

The records of all 57 patients in whom a rAAA was repaired during a 7-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Patients in the COS group (n = 30) were treated between January 2005 and December 2009; those in the SRAP group (n = 27) were treated between January 2010 and March 2012. The two groups were compared with respect to patient characteristics at admission, including severity of condition; operative and in-hospital variables; and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

The baseline patient characteristics in the COS and SRAP groups were similar except that the SRAP group had a significantly higher rate of cerebrovascular disease. The 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the COS group (43% vs. 19%), as were the intraoperative mortality rate (27% vs. 5%) and the in-hospital mortality rate (57% vs. 26%; P < 0.05 for all comparisons). The technical success rate for EVAR was 96%; no conversions to open surgery were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the SRAP is a promising strategy for improving initial outcomes in patients with rAAAs.

The femoral-based endowedge technique to increase juxtarenal seal and correct graft tilt

The endowedge technique refers to the use of balloons to align the scallops of the Gore Excluder endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) to the renal artery to increase juxtarenal seal during endovascular repair of aneurysms with challenging anatomy. With the availability of a reconstrainable deployment system, this now can be performed without the use of brachial access. In addition, the femoral approach facilitates the use of the balloon as a fulcrum to correct unfavorable graft tilt.

A retrospective review of Palmaz stenting of the aortic neck for endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

To review the aortic neck characteristics, graft types, and technical results of Palmaz stent placement as an adjunct to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 110 consecutive EVAR cases identified 18 cases in which Palmaz stents were placed as an adjunct to EVAR. Graft types, hostile aortic neck features (neck diameter: >26 mm, length: <15 mm, angulation: >60°, reverse taper necks), and treatment success were identified.

RESULTS

Technical success in the placement of a proximal Palmaz stent was achieved in 17 of 18 cases. Palmaz stenting was attempted for the treatment of type I endoleak in 17 of 18 patients. One prophylactic stent was deployed in the setting of hostile neck anatomy. Proximal stent deployment resulted in immediate treatment success of type I endoleaks in 16 of 17 patients-one failure occurred in a patient who presented with a delayed type I endoleak. Analysis of aortic neck anatomy revealed that two of 18 patients had no criteria for a hostile neck, seven had one criterion, and nine met at least two criteria. With respect to stent-graft types, nine of 18 (50%) cases used the Endologix Powerlink, six used Gore Excluder, two used Cook Zenith, and one used Medtronic Talent. With a mean follow-up of 254 days, 16 of 17 type I endoleaks remain resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

With proper patient selection and additional adjunctive treatments, Palmaz stenting can effectively treat proximal type I endoleaks.

Technical modifications for endovascular infrarenal AAA repair for the angulated and dumbbell-shaped neck: the precuff Kilt technique

BACKGROUND

High risk surgical patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and difficult infrarenal necks continue to be challenged when performing endovascular repair. Although fenestrated and branched endografts may ultimately be the main method of repair for these patients, their current limited availability has prompted the use of alternative endovascular techniques to enhance success of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with "dumbbell" shaped and angulated necks.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair with a predeployed aortic cuff (Kilt) at University of California, Los Angeles between January 2009 and April 2010 was performed.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent initial Kilt placement before endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The mean age of these patients was 78.0 + 7.0 years. All were American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 patients with multiple medical comorbidities. All of them had angulated and dumbbell-shaped necks. Median follow-up period was 11 months (8-18 months). All patients had postoperative computed tomography at 1 and 6 months because of their high-risk neck anatomy. One patient was found to have a large type I endoleak on computed tomography 1 month postoperatively. He required placement of an additional aortic cuff and Palmaz stent, after which the endoleak was found to have resolved. There were no open conversions, aneurysm sac enlargement, or perioperative deaths.

CONCLUSION

Short-term follow-up suggests that the Kilt technique may be useful in certain high-risk patients with traditionally unfavorable anatomy for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. It can be performed with minimal patient morbidity, even in high-risk patients. Anatomic features most amenable to this technique include dumbbell-shaped and angulated infrarenal necks.

Angled guidewire delivery of aortic endovascular prostheses for angulated landing zones

We present a case of a 90-year-old male with suprarenal, infrarenal, and bilateral iliac aneurysms with significant interval enlargement treated with an endovascular graft. Due to severe infrarenal neck angulation, a type 1a endoleak was encountered, which was successfully treated with an aortic cuff. A novel technique of cuff deployment over an angled guidewire to accommodate the aortic angulation was used. This represents the first report in the literature of using this technique to deal with difficult, angulated landing zones.