Foundations and Frontiers of Ecosystem Science: Legacy of a Classic Paper (Odum 1969)

Influence of the river flow pulse on the maturity, resilience, and sustainability of tropical coastal ecosystems

Coastal marine ecosystems have structural and functional features usually connected by the seasonal transfer of nutrients and organisms. These environments can utilize inter-ecosystem subsidies to increase resilience and maturity and support human activities like fishing. However, the importance of the connection and the role of the seasonal pulse of energy flows to enhance maturity are still poorly understood and reported. Our objective in this paper is to assess the effect of seasonal hydrological pulses on two tropical coastal interconnected ecosystems. Thus, we made four Ecopath models for estuarine and neritic environments considering the dry and rainy seasons, with a similar sampling design that allowed them to be compared. Our results provide evidence for the occurrence of the pulsed ecosystems since both environments seem driven by the river flow. Estuary presents more and more substantial differences (measured by ecosystem attributes) in both seasons because it is directly affected by river floods than the neritic environment. The neritic is affected indirectly by the movement of species from the estuary and by a weaker river flow. In the dry season, the differences between ecosystems are lower because the dry season trend to homogenize cycling, maturity, homeostasis, and resilience. We found that the seasonal river flow (pulse) forces the variability of biomass, flows, and ecosystem features, and this variance creates the required stability for both ecosystems. Still, these environments benefit through the exchange of components that relieve the pressures of predation on specific groups and maintain the energy flow necessary for the functioning of their trophic webs. The pulse by the rainfall favors connectivity and equalizes the two systems, increasing the connectivity between them and the exchange of subsidies that strengthens the trophic structures, contributing to the increase in maturity. In these ecosystems, seasonal changes become a key factor for exchanging flows that will promote sustainability, the accumulation of more biomass (growth), and the optimization of reserve energy (development) in both systems. This efficient joint strategy of perpetuation is what promotes resistance and resilience to these ecosystems, which together can reach different states of equilibrium, translated into maturity to withstand new environmental changes.

Multiscale responses and recovery of soils to wildfire in a sagebrush steppe ecosystem

Ecological theory predicts a pulse disturbance results in loss of soil organic carbon and short-term respiration losses that exceed recovery of productivity in many ecosystems. However, fundamental uncertainties remain in our understanding of ecosystem recovery where spatiotemporal variation in structure and function are not adequately represented in conceptual models. Here we show that wildfire in sagebrush shrublands results in multiscale responses that vary with ecosystem properties, landscape position, and their interactions. Consistent with ecological theory, soil pH increased and soil organic carbon (SOC) decreased following fire. In contrast, SOC responses were slope aspect and shrub-microsite dependent, with a larger proportional decrease under previous shrubs on north-facing aspects compared to south-facing ones. In addition, respiratory losses from burned aspects were not significantly different than losses from unburned aspects. We also documented the novel formation of soil inorganic carbon (SIC) with wildfire that differed significantly with aspect and microsite scale. Whereas pH and SIC recovered within 37 months post-fire, SOC stocks remained reduced, especially on north-facing aspects. Spatially, SIC formation was paired with reduced respiration losses, presumably lower partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2), and increased calcium availability, consistent with geochemical models of carbonate formation. Our findings highlight the formation of SIC after fire as a novel short-term sink of carbon in non-forested shrubland ecosystems. Resiliency in sagebrush shrublands may be more complex and integrated across ecosystem to landscape scales than predicted based on current theory.

Which Socio-economic Conditions Drive the Selection of Agroforestry at the Forest Frontier?

Models are essential to assess the socio-economic credentials of new agroforestry systems. In this study, we showcase robust optimisation as a tool to evaluate agroforestry's potential to meet farmers' multiple goals. Our modelling approach has three parts. First, we use a discrete land-use model to evaluate two agroforestry systems (alley cropping and silvopasture) and conventional land uses against five socio-economic objectives, focusing on the forest frontier in eastern Panama. Next, we couple the land-use model with robust optimisation, to determine the mix of land uses (farm portfolio) that minimises trade-offs between the five objectives. Here we consider uncertainty to simulate the land-use decisions of a risk-averse farmer. Finally, we assess how the type and amount of agroforestry included in the optimal land-use portfolio changes under different environmental, socio-economic and political scenarios, to explore the conditions that may make agroforestry more attractive for farmers. We identify silvopasture as a promising land use for meeting farmers' goals, especially for farms with less productive soils. The additional labour demand compared to conventional pasture, however, may prove an important barrier to adoption for farms facing acute labour shortages. The selection of agroforestry responded strongly to changes in investment costs and timber prices, suggesting that cost-sharing arrangements and tax incentives could be effective strategies to enhance adoption. We found alley cropping to be less compatible with farmers' risk aversion, but this agroforestry system may still be a desirable complement to the land-use portfolio, especially for farmers who are more profit-oriented and tolerant of risk.

How political philosophies can help to discuss and differentiate theories in community ecology

This paper uses structural analogies to competing political philosophies of human society as a heuristic tool to differentiate between ecological theories and to bring out new aspects of apparently well-known classics of ecological scholarship. These two different areas of knowledge have in common that their objects are 'societies', i.e. units composed of individuals, and that contradictory and competing theories about these supra-individual units exist. The benefit of discussing ecological theories in terms of their analogies to political philosophies, in this case liberalism, democratism and conservatism, consists in the fact that political philosophies show clear differences and particularities as regards their approach to the concepts of individuality and intentional action. The method therefore helps to expose peculiarities of ecological theories that are usually considered canonical (e.g. Clements, Gleason), as well as hybrid forms (E. P. Odum), and to differentiate between two different types of theories about functional wholes. The basis of this method is the constitutional-theoretical premise that modern paradigms of socialization structure the ecological discourse.