Practical approach to processing osteosarcomas in the surgical pathology laboratory

Utility of VS38c in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of osteosarcoma and other bone tumours/tumour-like lesions

Background

VS38c is a monoclonal antibody that recognises a rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) intracellular antigen termed cytoskeleton-linking membrane protein 63. rER is typically found in viable tumour cells and is abundant in osteosarcoma cells. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic utility of VS38c in the histological assessment of osteosarcoma and other bone tumours/tumour-like leisons.

Methods

Immunohistochemical staining with VS38c was carried out on formalin-fixed specimens of osteosarcoma (pre/post-chemotherapy) and a wide range of benign and malignant bone lesions. In addition, VS38c staining of cultures of MG63 and Sa0S2 osteosarcoma cell cultures. (±cisplatin and actinomycin D-treatment) was analysed.

Results

VS38c strongly stained tumour cells in all low-grade and high-grade osteosarcomas and in undifferentiated sarcomas and high-grade chondrosarcomas. There was little or no VS38c staining of low-grade chondrosarcomas or chordomas and variable staining of Ewing sarcomas. Osteoblasts in benign bone-forming tumours and mononuclear stromal cells in chondroblastomas, giant cell tumours and non-ossifying fibromas strongly stained for VS38c. VS38c staining was absent in cisplatin and actinomycin D treated Sa0S2 and MG63 cells. In specimens of osteosarcoma post-neoadjuvant therapy, VS38c staining was absent in most morphologically necrotic areas of tumor although some cells with pyknotic nuclei stained for VS38c in these areas. Most tumour cells exhibiting atypical nuclear forms were not stained by VS38c.

Conclusions

Our findings show that VS38c is a sensitive but not specific diagnostic marker of osteosarcoma. Staining with VS38c identifies viable osteosarcoma cells, a feature which may be useful in the assessment of percentage tumour necrosis post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Utility of Examination of Biopsy Tracts in Osteosarcoma Resection Specimens

OBJECTIVES

To determine the utility and necessity of submitting tissue sections from the biopsy tracts of osteosarcoma resection specimens.

METHODS

The prevalence of residual tumor in representative sections of osteosarcoma biopsy tracts was assessed in a series of 97 osteosarcoma resection specimens.

RESULTS

No residual tumor cells were identified in 97 sampled biopsy tracts (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-2.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologists do not need to submit sections of resected biopsy tracts unless there is clinical or gross evidence that would warrant further examination.

Diaphyseal osteosarcomas have distinct clinical features from metaphyseal osteosarcomas

AIMS

The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical features and outcomes of diaphyseal osteosarcoma.

METHODS

Patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma occurring in the long bone were eligible for this retrospective study. Clinicopathological information was collected from our database and compared with 36 diaphyseal, 405 proximal and 519 distal metaphyseal, and 14 whole bone osteosarcoma patients. Additionally, case-control study matching by age, gender, site, and metastatic status at diagnosis with 1:3 ratio of 36 diaphyseal to 108 metaphyseal osteosarcomas patients was also conducted.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival and metastasis-free survival of the three groups including diaphyseal, metaphyseal, and whole bone osteosarcoma patients showed significant difference (P = .029 and P = .013, respectively), although there is no difference for the survivals between proximal and distal metaphyseal osteosarcoma patients. Case-control study showed that patients with diaphyseal osteosarcomas had a significantly larger tumour (mean 13.5 cm vs 10 cm, P = .026), and demonstrated higher pathologic fracture rate (28% vs 12%, P = .033), superior 5-year metastasis-free survival (74% vs 40%, P = .0068), and slightly better 5-year overall survival (68% vs 46%, P = .074). Prognostic factor analysis showed that a pathologic fracture significantly decreased the survival of the patients with diaphyseal osteosarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that diaphyseal osteosarcoma has distinct clinical features from metaphyseal osteosarcoma having an increased risk of pathologic fractures but with favorable survival outcome.

Treatment effects in pediatric soft tissue and bone tumors: practical considerations for the pathologist

Dramatic improvements in survival for children with cancer have led to increased numbers of posttreatment pathologic specimens, particularly in bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Current therapeutic protocols in North America require specific pathologic classification and stratify patients based on clinical, biologic, and pathologic features. For osteosarcoma, the pathologic response to therapy predicts prognosis and modifies the treatment regimen. Ongoing studies aim to assess the response to therapy and outcome in other types of soft tissue and bone tumors. The pathologic evaluation of pretreatment and posttreatment specimens is critical for therapeutic decisions and prognostic assessment. A standardized approach to posttherapy pathologic specimens, with attention to appropriate use of ancillary tests, and assessment of clinical and biologic significance of therapy-induced pathologic changes has significance for patient management and treatment protocols.

Recommendations for the reporting of bone tumors

The diagnosis of a bone tumor is often an arduous task, even for the most experienced orthopedic pathologist. As a starting point, the classification of bone tumors is based on a histogenetic perspective encompassing the type of matrix produced (or not produced) by the tumor. In general, the surgical pathology report should include data pertinent to the treatment and prognostication of an individual patient, and the report should be delivered to the clinician in a clear, concise fashion. Reporting of most bone tumors is similar and includes such information as the type of surgery done, anatomic site, histological type and grade of the tumor (if applicable), and the adequacy of surgical margins. Special emphasis is needed for those tumors with distinct and well-established prognostic and therapeutic features such as osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor. Our recommendation emphasizes a standardized protocol for these sarcomas, especially in light of evidence that postchemotherapeutic tumor necrosis is of prognostic significance. It is also important to note that radiographic imaging plays a very important, often critical, role in allowing the pathologist the opportunity to reach the best final diagnosis. This is especially true when a malignant interpretation is contemplated and in subtyping lesions. We recommend close collaboration between musculoskeletal radiologists, clinicians, and pathologists when dealing with complicated neoplasms of bone.

Examination of tumor and tumor-like conditions of bone

Surgical pathology specimens composed of bone, ranging from core biopsy to limb amputation specimens, require special attention, processing, and often unique equipment. This readily translates into additional handling steps and time, especially when one factors in clinical correlation with the surgeon and radiologic review of all images with a knowledgeable musculoskeletal radiologist. When these factors are superimposed on the rarity of these lesions in routine practice, it is not surprising that most trainees, as well as seasoned pathologists, are wary of these lesions. In this report, we use a case of osteofibrous dysplasia (Campanacci's disease) to demonstrate the dissection of such a surgical specimen and complete the report with a brief discussion of the entity.