Laparoscopic paraoesophageal hernia repair: fundoplication is not usually indicated

Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; I2 = 57%) in observational studies but not RCTs (RR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.47, 2.02; I2 = 34%), and higher total early dysphagia based on five observational studies (RR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.10, 1.89; I2 = 40%) but was not statistically significant in RCTs (RR = 3.00, 95%CI 0.64, 14.16). There was no difference in complications, reintervention, heartburn, reflux, or quality of life. There were no appropriate studies comparing surgery to observation in asymptomatic patients. Fundoplication resulted in higher early dysphagia in both observational studies and RCTs ([RR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.16, 3.76] and [RR = 20.58, 95%CI 1.34, 316.69]) but lower reflux in RCTs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17, 0.56, I2 = 0%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y was associated with a lower reintervention risk after 30 days compared to redo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.

[Surgical strategy for hiatal hernias]

The indications for surgical treatment of hiatus hernias differentiate between type I and types II, III and IV hernias. The indications for a type I hernia should include a proven reflux disease but the indications for surgical treatment of types II, III and IV hernias are mandatory due to the symptoms with problems in the passage of food and due to the sometimes very severe possible complications. The primary aims of surgery are the repositioning of the herniated contents and a hiatoplasty, which includes a surgical narrowing of the esophageal hiatus by suture implantation. In addition, depending on the clinical situation other procedures, such as hernia sac removal, mesh implantation, gastropexy and fundoplication can be considered. There are various approaches to the repair, all of which have individual advantages and disadvantages. An adaptation to the specific needs situation of the patient and the expertise of the surgeon is therefore essential.

Poor Gastric Emptying in Patients with Paraesophageal Hernias: Pyloroplasty, Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy, BoTox, or Wait and See?

Gastric emptying delay may be caused with both functional and anatomic derangements. Gastroparesis is suspected in patients presenting with certain foregut symptoms without anatomic obstruction. Data are still emerging regarding the best treatment of this condition. In cases where large paraesophageal hernias alter the upper gastrointestinal anatomy, it is difficult to know if gastroparesis also exists. Management of hiatal hernias is also still evolving, with various strategies to reduce recurrence being actively investigated. In this article, we present a systematic review of the existing literature around the management of gastroparesis and the management of paraesophageal hernias when they occur separately. In addition, since there are limited data to guide diagnosis and management of these conditions when they are suspected to coexist, we provide a rational strategy based on our own experience in patients with paraesophageal hernias who have symptoms or studies that raise suspicion for a coexisting functional disorder.

Is fundoplication necessary after paraesophageal hernia repair? A meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Paraesophageal hernias are often asymptomatic, but when symptomatic they should be fixed laparoscopically. A cruroplasty of the diaphragmatic pillars is performed and a fundoplication is usually performed at the time. However, there are times, especially in emergency cases, where it is not always possible to perform a fundoplication. We hypothesized there would be no difference in outcomes whether or not a fundoplication is performed as part of a paraesophageal hernia repair.

METHODS

A literature review of available clinical databases was performed using PubMed, Clinical Key and Google Scholar. Our search terms were: "paraesophageal hernia" "paraesophageal hernia repair" "fundoplication" "emergency surgery" "no fundoplication" We excluded studies that were in languages other than English, abstracts and small case series.

RESULTS

Our search criteria yielded a total of 22 studies published between 1997 and 2020. There were a total of 8600 subjects enrolled into this study. The overall pooled prevalence of fundoplication were estimated as 69% (95% CI: 59%-78%). In patients who underwent fundoplication, the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was reduced as compared to patients who did not undergo fundoplication (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.40-1.04, p = 0.069, I2 = 47.2%). A similar trend was also observed in recurrence (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.27-1.03, p = 0.061, I2 = 0.0%) and reoperations (RR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.02-2.69, p = 0.25, I2 = 56.7%). However, patients who underwent fundoplication had an increased risk of dysphagia (RR: 1.68, 95% CI: 0.59-4.81, p = 0.83, I2 = 42%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a higher rate of recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrence of hernia and reoperation when no fundoplication is performed during a paraesophageal hernia repair but a lower risk of dysphagia, but none of these reached statistical significance.(Comment 1) Paraesophageal hernia repair with fundoplication should be performed, but it is acceptable to not do it in certain situations.

Paraesophageal hernia: to fundoplicate or not?

The need for an antireflux procedure during repair of a paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has been the subject of a long-standing controversy. With most centers now performing routine fundoplication during PEH repair, high-quality data on whether crural repair alone or using a mesh may provide adequate anti-reflux effect is still scarce. We sought to answer to the question: "Is fundoplication routinely needed during PEH repair?". Our endpoints were (I) rates of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (either symptomatic or objectively assessed), (II) rates of recurrence, and (III) rates of postoperative dysphagia. We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases for papers published between 1995 and 2019, selecting comparative cohort studies and only including papers reporting the rationale for performing or not performing fundoplication. Overall, nine papers were included for review. While four of the included studies recommended selective or no fundoplication, most of these data come from earlier retrospective studies. Higher-quality data from recent prospective studies including two randomized controlled trials recommended routine fundoplication, mostly due to a significantly lower incidence of postoperative GERD. However, only a relatively short follow-up of 12 months was presented, which we recognize as an important limitation. Fundoplication did not seem to result in reduced recurrence rates when compared to primary repair alone.

Management of paraesophageal hernia review of clinical studies: timing to surgery, mesh use, fundoplication, gastropexy and other controversies

Despite paraesophageal hernias (PEH) being a common disorder, several aspects of their management remain elusive. Elective surgery in asymptomatic patients, management of acute presentation, and other technical aspects such as utilization of mesh, fundoplication or gastropexy are some of the debated issues. The aim of this study was to review the available evidence in an attempt to clarify current controversial topics. PEH repair in an asymptomatic patient may be reasonable in selected patients to avoid potential morbidity of an emergent operation. In acute presentation, gastric decompression and resuscitation could allow to improve the patient's condition and refer the repair to a more experienced surgical team. When surgical repair is decided, laparoscopy is the optimal approach in most of the cases. Mesh should be used in selected patients such as those with large PEH or redo operations. While a fundoplication is recommended in the majority of patients to prevent postoperative reflux, a gastropexy can be used in selected cases to facilitate postoperative care.

How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery)

OBJECTIVE

Antireflux surgery can be proposed in patients with GORD, especially when proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use leads to incomplete symptom improvement. However, to date, international consensus guidelines on the clinical criteria and additional technical examinations used in patient selection for antireflux surgery are lacking. We aimed at generating key recommendations in the selection of patients for antireflux surgery.

DESIGN

We included 35 international experts (gastroenterologists, surgeons and physiologists) in a Delphi process and developed 37 statements that were revised by the Consensus Group, to start the Delphi process. Three voting rounds followed where each statement was presented with the evidence summary. The panel indicated the degree of agreement for the statement. When 80% of the Consensus Group agreed (A+/A) with a statement, this was defined as consensus. All votes were mutually anonymous.

RESULTS

Patients with heartburn with a satisfactory response to PPIs, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH), patients with oesophagitis Los Angeles (LA) grade B or higher and patients with Barrett's oesophagus are good candidates for antireflux surgery. An endoscopy prior to antireflux surgery is mandatory and a barium swallow should be performed in patients with suspicion of a HH or short oesophagus. Oesophageal manometry is mandatory to rule out major motility disorders. Finally, oesophageal pH (±impedance) monitoring of PPI is mandatory to select patients for antireflux surgery, if endoscopy is negative for unequivocal reflux oesophagitis.

CONCLUSION

With the ICARUS guidelines, we generated key recommendations for selection of patients for antireflux surgery.

Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia

Background

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair is a complex surgery typically performed by general abdominal surgeons because it typically involves an abdominal approach. Here, we report our experiences on laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia as thoracic surgeons.

Methods

Based on our experience of minimally invasive esophageal surgery (MIES) for esophageal cancer, we began performing laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia in 2009. We analyzed the surgery-related data and postoperative outcomes of 18 consecutive patients we operated on from 2009 to 2017.

Results

There were 1 male and 17 female patients with a median age of 73 years (range, 37-81 years). Ten of 14 symptomatic patients experienced reflux symptoms, such as heartburn. Four patients had a history of prior abdominal surgery. Hiatal hernia types I, II, III, and IV were observed in 3, 9, 5, and 1 patients, respectively. Two (11.1%) laparoscopic procedures required conversion. Modified Collis gastroplasty was used as an esophageal lengthening procedure in 5 patients (27.8%). Mean operation time was 213.8±70.1 minutes and mean hospital stay was 6.2±1.5 days. There were no postoperative complications. At the last follow-up, 15 patients (83.3%) were asymptomatic; however, 3 (16.7%) complained of reflux or dysphagia. Recurrent hiatal hernia was detected on an esophagogram in only 1 patient at 3.5 years after laparoscopic surgery.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia is a feasible technique with a satisfactory surgical outcome. Importantly, it can be performed by thoracic surgeons who are experienced in the laparoscopic approach.

Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 2018

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Korea, and physicians, including surgeons, have been focusing on its treatment. Indeed, in Korea, medical treatment using a proton pump inhibitor is the mainstream treatment for GERD, while awareness of surgical treatment is limited. Accordingly, to promote the understanding of surgical treatment for GERD, the Korean Anti-Reflux Surgery Study Group published the Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for the Surgical Treatment of GERD. The guideline consists of 2 sections: fundamental information such as the definition, symptoms, and diagnostic tools of GERD and a recommendation statement about its surgical treatment. The recommendations presented 5 debates regarding fundoplication: 1) comparison of the effectiveness of medical and surgical treatments, 2) effectiveness of surgical treatment in cases of refractory GERD, 3) effectiveness of surgical treatment of extraesophageal symptoms, 4) comparison of effectiveness between total and partial fundoplication, and 5) effectiveness of fundoplication in cases of hiatal hernia. The present guideline is the first to demonstrate the efficacy of the surgical treatment GERD in Korea.

Biologic Keyhole Mesh in Hiatal Hernia Repair

Background and Objectives

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) is the new standard, but the use of mesh is still debated. Biologic mesh has shown great promise, but only the U-shaped onlay has been extensively studied. Postoperative dysphagia has historically been a concern with the use of synthetic keyhole mesh and subsequently slowed its adoption. The purpose of our study was to identify the incidence of postoperative dysphagia in a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with novel placement of keyhole biologic mesh.

Methods

Thirty consecutive patients who underwent hernia repair with primary suture cruroplasty and human acellular dermal matrix keyhole mesh reinforcement were reviewed over a 2-year period. All procedures were performed at a single institution. Postoperative symptoms were retrospectively identified. Any postoperative hernia on imaging was defined as radiographic recurrence.

Results

Of the 30 consecutive patients who underwent hernia repair, 3 (10%) had mild preoperative dysphagia. The number remained unchanged after LPEHR with keyhole mesh. Return of mild reflux symptoms occurred in 6 (20%) patients. Repeat imaging was performed in 11 patients (37%) at an average of 8 months with 2 slight recurrences. All hernias were classified on preoperative imaging as large hiatal hernias. There were no postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with biologic keyhole mesh reinforcement has a low recurrence rate and no increase in postoperative dysphagia. The traditional belief that keyhole mesh has a higher incidence of dysphagia was not evident in this series.

Long-term clinical outcomes after intrathoracic stomach surgery: a decade of longitudinal follow-up

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients with large paraesophageal hernias have more than 75% of the stomach herniated above the diaphragm; such cases are referred to as intrathoracic stomach (ITS). Herein, we report longitudinal symptomatic outcomes over a decade after surgical ITS repair in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical treatment for ITS from 01/2004 to 05/2016 were studied. Preoperative and follow-up data were prospectively collected. Patients completed a standardized symptom questionnaire 1 year postoperatively and at 2-year intervals thereafter.

RESULTS

In total, 235 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 70.0 ± 11.6 years; 174 patients (74.0%) were women. Surgical procedures included 7 transthoracic repairs and 228 transabdominal repairs (222 laparoscopic, 2 open, 4 laparoscopic-to-open conversions). Anti-reflux procedures were performed in 173 patients (73.6%). 33 patients (14.0%) had mesh reinforcement of hiatal closure; 11 (4.7%) underwent Collis gastroplasty. Follow-up symptom questionnaires at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 years were available for 81, 48, 47, 30, 33, and 38% of patients, respectively. Significant and lasting symptom improvement was reported at all follow-up time points. Mean satisfaction scores of 9.3, 9.1, 9.3, 9.0, 9.5, and 9.8 on a 1-10 scale were recorded at the aforementioned intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term clinical outcomes confirm that laparoscopic ITS repair is safe and durable, and is associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction and symptom resolution.

Modern diagnosis and treatment of hiatal hernias

PURPOSE

Hiatal hernias are a common finding on radiographic or endoscopic studies. Hiatal hernias may become symptomatic or, less frequently, can incarcerate or become a volvulus leading to organ ischemia. This review examines latest evidence on the diagnostic workup and management of hiatal hernias.

METHODS

A literature review of contemporary and latest studies with highest quality of evidence was completed. This information was examined and compiled in review format.

RESULTS

Asymptomatic hiatal and paraesophageal hernias become symptomatic and necessitate repair at a rate of 1% per year. Watchful waiting is appropriate for asymptomatic hernias. Symptomatic hiatal hernias and those with confirmed reflux disease require operative repair with an anti-reflux procedure. Key operative steps include the following: reduction and excision of hernia sac, 3 cm of intraabdominal esophageal length, crural closure with mesh reinforcement, and an anti-reflux procedure. Repairs not amenable to key steps may undergo gastropexy and gastrostomy placement as an alternative procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Hiatal hernias are commonly incidental findings. When hernias become symptomatic or have reflux disease, an operative repair is required. A minimally invasive approach is safe and has improved outcomes.

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias

Background and Objectives:

Laparoscopy has quickly become the standard surgical approach to repair paraesophageal hernias. Although many centers routinely perform this procedure, relatively high recurrence rates have led many surgeons to question this approach. We sought to evaluate outcomes in our cohort of patients with an emphasis on recurrence rates and symptom improvement and their correlation with true radiologic recurrence seen on contrast imaging.

Methods:

We retrospectively identified 126 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a large paraesophageal hernia between 2000 and 2010. Clinical outcomes were reviewed, and data were collected regarding operative details, perioperative and postoperative complications, symptoms, and follow-up imaging. Radiologic evidence of any size hiatal hernia was considered to indicate a recurrence.

Results:

There were 95 female and 31 male patients with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 71 ± 14 years. Laparoscopic repair was completed successfully in 120 of 126 patients, with 6 operations converted to open procedures. Crural reinforcement with mesh was performed in 79% of patients, and 11% underwent a Collis gastroplasty. Fundoplications were performed in 90% of patients: Nissen (112), Dor (1), and Toupet (1). Radiographic surveillance, obtained at a mean time interval of 23 months postoperatively, was available in 89 of 126 patients (71%). Radiographic evidence of a recurrence was present in 19 patients (21%). Reoperation was necessary in 6 patients (5%): 5 for symptomatic recurrence (4%) and 1 for dysphagia (1%). The median length of stay was 4 days.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair results in an excellent outcome with a short length of stay when performed at an experienced center. Radiologic recurrence is observed relatively frequently with routine surveillance; however, many of these recurrences are small, and few patients require correction of the recurrence. Furthermore, these small recurrent hernias are often asymptomatic and do not seem to be associated with the same risk of severe complications developing as the initial paraesophageal hernia.

[Report of 12 years experience in the surgical treatment of 286 paraesophageal hernias]

BACKGROUND

In contrast to axial hiatus hernias, paraesophageal hernias are rare but can lead to chronic iron deficiency anemia and severe acute complications. Treatment is manifold and consistent standards are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe our experiences of 286 patients with paraesophageal hernias, who underwent surgery from 2003 to 2014 at a tertiary referral center. The study was particularly concerned with morbidity, mortality, quality of life and recurrence rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 12 years a total of 286 paraesophageal hernias were surgically treated, 255 with a minimally invasive procedure and 31 with an open approach. In 138 patients (48 %) the suture-based hiatoplasty was reinforced by means of a lightweight mesh, which was fixed with fibrin glue in 90 cases. Abdominal fixation of the stomach consisted of a gastropexy and anterior (n = 244) or posterior (n = 42) fundoplication.

RESULTS

Complications arose in 8.4 % of the patients. The mean hospital stay was 5.3 (± 2.8) days for elective surgery and 24.7 (± 17.8) days for emergency operations. The gastrointestinal quality of life index according to Eypasch significantly increased from mean preoperative values of 92.8 (± 22.5) to 109.6 (± 20.2) in the postoperative course (p < 0.001). Of the patients 20 (7 %) suffered a recurrence requiring surgery, including 7 early and 13 late recurrences. During the immediate postoperative period radiographically detected recurrences were promptly revised. The strategy of late recurrences in the long-term course was based on patient symptoms and asymptomatic hernias were treated conservatively while symptomatic hernias were surgically treated. Symptomatic late recurrences developed in 4.6 % of the patients, including 7.4 % (11 out of 148) without and 1.4 % (2 out of 138) with primary mesh repair.

CONCLUSION

The repair of paraesophageal hernias in 286 patients provided excellent patient satisfaction and symptom improvement with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. Mesh reinforcement reduced the recurrence rate. The quality of life index is a suitable clinical course parameter for evaluation of paraesophageal hernias.

Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia. A single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Giant hiatal hernia is a rare clinical entity with possibly serious complications, diagnosed mostly among older patients. The laparoscopic repair of such hernias is a therapeutic option, performed mostly in specialized centers by experienced surgeons.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2012 fifty-five patients with giant hiatal hernia (median age of 72) were primarily treated by laparoscopic surgery at the surgical department of the Catholic Clinic Oberhausen. Demographic data, operating times, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality were recorded prospectively. Follow-up was conducted by means of a mailed questionnaire.

RESULTS

Intraoperative complications occurred in 1,8% of the cases (n = 1). In this single case the procedure was converted to an open procedure due to technical difficulties imposed by hepatomegaly. The median operating time was 96 min (range, 30 to 350). Our rate of postoperative complications was 14,5% (n = 8). The median postoperative hospital stay was nine days. 14,5% (n = 8) of our patients underwent a redo-surgery for symptomatic recurrence. The median follow-up was 64 months by means of a self-designed questionnaire. 34,5% (19/55) of the questioned patients responded to our survey. The difference between pre- and postoperative symptom intensity was found to be significant for heartburn (p < 0,001) and retrosternal/epigastric pain (p = 0,028). The difference was not found to be statistically significant for dysphagia (p = 0,8) and bloating (p = 0,3). 85% of the questioned patients stated they would have the operation again, if necessary. 80% reported an improvement of their overall quality of life.

DISCUSSION

The laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias is a safe approach with an intraoperative complication rate of 1,8%, low post-operative morbidity (14,5%) and very low mortality (1,8%). There is a high patient satisfaction (85%) and a good postoperative quality of life (80%).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach for repair of large hiatal hernias is a relatively safe method with significant long-term efficacy in terms of symptom control and quality of life.

Contemporary management of paraesophaegeal hernias: establishing a European expert consensus

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of paraesophageal hernias remains a challenge due to the lack of consensus regarding principles of operative treatment. The objectives of this study were to achieve consensus on key topics through expert opinion using a Delphi methodology.

METHODS

A Delphi survey combined with a face-to-face meeting was conducted. A panel of European experts in foregut surgery from high-volume centres generated items in the first survey round. In subsequent rounds, the panel rated agreement with statements on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Internal consistency (consensus) was predefined as Cronbach's α > .80. Items that >70 % of the panel either rated as irrelevant/unimportant, or relevant/important were selected as consensus items, while topics that did not reach this cut-off were termed "undecided/controversial".

RESULTS

Three survey rounds were completed: 19 experts from 10 countries completed round one, 18 continued through rounds two and three. Internal consistency was high in rounds two and three (α > .90). Fifty-eight additional/revised items derived from comments and free-text entries were included in round three. In total, 118 items were rated; consensus agreement was achieved for 70 of these. Examples of consensus topics are the relevance of the disease profile for assessing surgical urgency and complexity, the role of clinical history as the mainstay of patient follow-up, indications for revision surgery, and training and credentialing recommendations. Topics with the most "undecided/controversial" items were follow-up, postoperative care and surgical technique.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study achieved expert consensus on key topics in the operative management of paraesophageal hernias, providing an overview of the current opinion among European foregut surgeons. Moreover, areas with substantial variability in opinions were identified reflecting the current lack of empirical evidence and opportunities for future research.

The Need for Fundoplication at the Time of Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

Most authors recommend an antireflux operation at the time of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. A fundoplication combats the potential postoperative reflux resulting from disruption of the hiatal anatomy and may minimize recurrence. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the differences in postoperative dysphagia, reflux symptoms, and hiatal hernia recurrence in patients with and without a fundoplication at the time of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH repair from July 2006 to June 2012 were identified. Open repairs and reoperative cases were excluded. Patient characteristics, operative details, complications, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Over the six-year period, 152 laparoscopic PEH repairs were performed. Mean age was 65.8 years (range, 31 to 92) and average body mass index was 29.9 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 52 kg/m2). Concomitant fundoplication was performed in 130 patients (86%), which was determined based on preoperative symptoms and esophageal motility. Mean operative times were similar with fundoplication (188 minutes) and without (184.5 minutes). At a mean follow-up of 13.9 months, there were 19 recurrences: 12.3 per cent (16 of 130) in the fundoplication group and 13.6 per cent (three of 22) in those without. Dysphagia lasting greater than six weeks was present in eight patients in the fundoplication group (6.2%) and in none in those without ( P = 0.603). Eighteen percent of patients without a fundoplication reported postoperative reflux compared with 5.4 per cent of patients with a fundoplication ( P = 0.055). In the laparoscopic repair of PEH, the addition of a fundoplication minimizes postoperative reflux symptoms without additional operative time. Neither dysphagia nor hiatal hernia recurrence is affected by the presence of a fundoplication.

Paraoesophageal herniation: a review

BACKGROUND

Paraoesophageal hiatus herniae repair can represent a formidable challenge. Afflicted patients tend to be elderly with multiple infirmities often with cardio-pulmonary dysfunction. They may present acutely with protracted vomiting and concurrent biochemical imbalances and it is a technically demanding procedure. There are several debated issues regarding operative technique. This paper will attempt to explain the nature of paraoesophageal hiatus herniae and reviews the recommended pre-operative investigations and operative strategies available.

METHODS

A literature search was performed from Pubmed and suitable clinical papers were selected for review. When attempting to address whether meshes should be included routinely, electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library. A systematic search was done with the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: 'paraoesophageal hernia repair' AND 'mesh'. In PubMed and Embase the search was carried out with the limits 'humans', 'English language', 'all adult: 19+ years' and 'published between 1990 and 2010'. A manual cross-reference search of the bibliographies of included papers was carried out to identify additional potentially relevant studies.

RESULTS

Firm conclusions are difficult to draw due to the diverse nature of both the disorder and the presentation however principals of management can be suggested. Similarly, there is no conclusive proof of the most effective operative technique and therefore the options are described.

CONCLUSION

Due to the relative lack of cases encountered at smaller institutions, there is a good argument for centralisation of these cases into regional centres to allow research and facilitate improvements in care.

Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies

Practically, hiatal hernias are divided into sliding hiatal hernias (type I) and PEH (types II, III, or IV). Patients with PEH are usually symptomatic with GERD or obstructive symptoms, such as dysphagia. Rarely, patients present with acute symptoms of hernia incarceration, such as severe epigastric pain and retching. A thorough evaluation includes a complete history and physical examination, chest radiograph, UGI series, esophagogastroscopy, and manometry. These investigations define the patient's anatomy, rule out other disease processes, and confirm the diagnosis. Operable symptomatic patients with PEH should be repaired. The underlying surgical principles for successful repair include reduction of hernia contents, removal of the hernia sac, closure of the hiatal defect, and an antireflux procedure. Debate remains whether a transthoracic, transabdominal, or laparoscopic approach is best with good surgical outcomes being reported with all three techniques. Placement of mesh to buttress the hiatal closure is reported to reduce hernia recurrence. Long-term follow-up is required to determine whether the laparoscopic approach with mesh hiatoplasty becomes the procedure of choice.