1
|
Zerbib F. High resolution manometry as a diagnostic tool for gastro-esophageal reflux: A step forward but not yet ready for clinical use. United European Gastroenterol J 2024. [PMID: 38638028 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salvador R, Pandolfino JE, Costantini M, Gyawali CP, Keller J, Mittal S, Roman S, Savarino EV, Tatum R, Tolone S, Zerbib F, Capovilla G, Jain A, Kathpalia P, Provenzano L, Yadlapati R. The Role of High-Resolution Manometry Prior to and Following Antireflux Surgery: The Padova Consensus. Ann Surg 2024:00000658-990000000-00840. [PMID: 38606560 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last two decades the development of high-resolution manometry (HRM) has changed and revolutionized the diagnostic assessment of patients complain foregut symptoms. The role of HRM before and after antireflux procedure remains unclear, especially in surgical practice, where a clear understanding of esophageal physiology and hiatus anatomy is essential for optimal outcome of antireflux surgery (ARS). Surgeons and gastroenterologists (GIs) agree that assessing patients following antireflux procedures can be challenging. Although endoscopy and barium-swallow can reveal anatomic abnormalities, physiologic information on HRM allowing insight into the cause of eventually recurrent symptoms could be key to clinical decision making. METHOD A multi-disciplinary international working group (14 surgeons and 15 GIs) collaborated to develop consensus on the role of HRM pre- and post- ARS, and to develop a postoperative classification to interpret HRM findings. The method utilized was detailed literature review to develop statements, and the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methodology (RAM) to assess agreement with the statements. Only statements with an approval rate >80% or a final ranking with a median score of 7 were accepted in the consensus. The working groups evaluated the role of HRM prior to ARS and the role of HRM following ARS. CONCLUSION This international initiative developed by surgeons and GIs together, summarizes the state of our knowledge of the use of HRM pre- and post-ARS. The Padova Classification was developed to facilitate the interpretation of HRM studies of patients underwent ARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Salvador
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy
| | - John E Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mario Costantini
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jutta Keller
- Israelitic Hospital, Academic Hospital University of Hamburg, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sumeet Mittal
- Foregut Program, Norton Thoracic Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Lyon University and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy
| | - Roger Tatum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Salvatore Tolone
- Medicine & Surgery, Universita degli Studi della Campania, School of Medicine Naples, Italy
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401; Bordeaux, France
| | - Giovanni Capovilla
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy
| | - Anand Jain
- Division of Gastroenterology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Priya Kathpalia
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Luca Provenzano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vauquelin B, Quénéhervé L, Pioche M, Barret M, Wallenhorst T, Chabrun E, Coron E, Roman S, Mion F, Chaussade S, Ponchon T, Olivier R, Rivière P, Zerbib F, Berger A. Factors associated with early failure of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:349-357.e3. [PMID: 37806398 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Achalasia can be treated very effectively with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), but factors associated with early failure remain to be determined, especially in European cohorts. METHODS All consecutive adult patients who underwent a first POEM to treat primary achalasia were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Early failure was defined by an Eckardt score (ES) >3 at 3 months after POEM. When evaluating factors predictive of early failure, 2 cohorts were considered: one consisted of the total population, for whom only basic variables were collected, and the other a cohort built for a case-control study that included matched early-failure and early-success patients (ratio, 1:2). RESULTS Among 746 patients, the early failure rate was 9.4%. Predictive factors were age ≤45 years (P = .019), achalasia types I and III (P < .001), and the development of a severe adverse event during the procedure (P = .023). In the case-control study, the only additional independent risk factor for early failure was a high pre-POEM ES (P = .001). Only the retrosternal pain subscore was significantly associated with the early failure rate. CONCLUSION The early failure rate of POEM used to treat primary achalasia is <10%. Younger age, type I/III achalasia, and a high pre-POEM ES were significantly associated with failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blandine Vauquelin
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, INSERM CIC 1401, Haut-Lévêque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lucille Quénéhervé
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon University, Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Lyon, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Timothée Wallenhorst
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Edouard Chabrun
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, INSERM CIC 1401, Haut-Lévêque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon University Hospital, Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Lyon, France
| | - François Mion
- Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon University Hospital, Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Lyon, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon University, Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Lyon, France
| | - Raphael Olivier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Pauline Rivière
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, INSERM CIC 1401, Haut-Lévêque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, INSERM CIC 1401, Haut-Lévêque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Arthur Berger
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, INSERM CIC 1401, Haut-Lévêque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leroi AM, Queralto M, Zerbib F, Siproudhis L, Vitton V, Amarenco G, Etienney I, Mion F, Bridoux V, Philip J, Brochard C, Damon H, Lacroix E, Gillibert A, Gourcerol G. Intrarectal injections of botulinum toxin versus placebo for the treatment of urge faecal incontinence in adults (FI-Toxin): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:147-158. [PMID: 38128556 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00332-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-randomised studies assessing intrarectal botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) injections for faecal incontinence are promising. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BoNTA for the treatment of faecal incontinence in a randomised study. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we included adult patients who had at least one urgency or faecal incontinence episode per week for at least 3 months and who had experienced a failure of conservative or surgical treatment from eight French specialist hospital units with the skills to manage patients with faecal incontinence. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central web form to receive intrarectal submucosal injections of either 200 units of BoNTA (Botox; Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA; BoNTA group) or an equivalent volume of saline (placebo group), stratified by Cleveland Clinic Severity scores (CCS score; ≥12 or <12). Patients, investigators, study site staff, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment allocation up to the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was the number of episodes of faecal incontinence and urgency per day assessed using 21-day patient bowel diaries 3 months after the treatment. The primary analysis was performed using a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach (ie, in all the randomised patients who had received a treatment) with adjustment for baseline faecal incontinence and urgency episodes. After the final data collection at 6 months after injections, patients were unmasked and offered the BoNTA treatment if they were in the placebo group (rescue therapy) without masking, with an additional 6 months of safety follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02414425. FINDINGS Between Nov 25, 2015, and Nov 25, 2020, we randomly assigned 200 patients to receive either BoNTA (n=100) or placebo (n=100) injections. Due to withdrawals before the injections, 96 patients were included in the BoNTA group and 95 patients were included in the placebo group (mITT analysis). The mean number of faecal incontinence and urgency episodes per day in the BoNTA group decreased from 1·9 (SD 2·2) at baseline to 0·8 (1·8) at 3 months after the injections, and from 1·4 (1·1) to 1·0 (1·0) in the placebo group, with a baseline-adjusted mean group difference at 3 months estimated at -0·51 (95% CI -0·80 to -0·21, p=0·0008). No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in the trial. The most frequently reported non-serious adverse event (treatment related or not) following the BoNTA or placebo injections was constipation (reported in 68 [40%] of 169 patients who received the BoNTA injections and 38 [40%] of 95 patients who received placebo injections). INTERPRETATION BoNTA injections are an efficacious treatment for urge faecal incontinence. Further research will define the optimum selection criteria, dose, site of injection, re-injection frequency, and long-term results. FUNDING General Direction of Healthcare (French Ministry of Health).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Marie Leroi
- Université de Rouen Normandie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), ADEN UMR1073, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Rouen, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CIC-CRB) 1404, Department of Digestive Physiology, Rouen, France.
| | - Michel Queralto
- Colproctology Unit, Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Levêque, Department of Gastroenterology, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laurent Siproudhis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inphy CIC1414, CHU Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Véronique Vitton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, France
| | - Gérard Amarenco
- Sorbonne Université, Groupe de Recherche Clinique (GRC) 001, GREEN GRC en Neuro-Urologie, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Etienney
- Department of Coloproctology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Francois Mion
- Université de Lyon, Department of Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Valerie Bridoux
- Université de Rouen Normandie, INSERM, ADEN UMR1073, CHU Rouen, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen, France
| | - Julie Philip
- Colproctology Unit, Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France
| | - Charlène Brochard
- Diseases of the Digestive Tract Department, Functional Digestive Explorations Division, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Pontchaillou, CIC1414, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France; INSERM U1235, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Henri Damon
- Université de Lyon, Department of Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Elie Lacroix
- Department of Biostatistics, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
| | | | - Guillaume Gourcerol
- Université de Rouen Normandie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), ADEN UMR1073, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Rouen, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CIC-CRB) 1404, Department of Digestive Physiology, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut 2024; 73:361-371. [PMID: 37734911 PMCID: PMC10846564 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
The Lyon Consensus provides conclusive criteria for and against the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and adjunctive metrics that consolidate or refute GERD diagnosis when primary criteria are borderline or inconclusive. An international core and working group was assembled to evaluate research since publication of the original Lyon Consensus, and to vote on statements collaboratively developed to update criteria. The Lyon Consensus 2.0 provides a modern definition of actionable GERD, where evidence from oesophageal testing supports revising, escalating or personalising GERD management for the symptomatic patient. Symptoms that have a high versus low likelihood of relationship to reflux episodes are described. Unproven versus proven GERD define diagnostic strategies and testing options. Patients with no prior GERD evidence (unproven GERD) are studied using prolonged wireless pH monitoring or catheter-based pH or pH-monitoring off antisecretory medication, while patients with conclusive GERD evidence (proven GERD) and persisting symptoms are evaluated using pH-impedance monitoring while on optimised antisecretory therapy. The major changes from the original Lyon Consensus criteria include establishment of Los Angeles grade B oesophagitis as conclusive GERD evidence, description of metrics and thresholds to be used with prolonged wireless pH monitoring, and inclusion of parameters useful in diagnosis of refractory GERD when testing is performed on antisecretory therapy in proven GERD. Criteria that have not performed well in the diagnosis of actionable GERD have been retired. Personalisation of investigation and management to each patient's unique presentation will optimise GERD diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California in San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Medicine/Section of Gastroenterology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David Katzka
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Pandolfino
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Stuart Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor Scott and White North Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mark R Fox
- Gastroenterology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Yu Kyung Cho
- Gastroenterology, Catholic University of Korea - Songsin Campus, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Digestive System Research Unit, Universidad del Desarrollo Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Las Condes, Chile
| | - Chien-Lin Chen
- Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Charles Cock
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Albis Hani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yan-sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Department of Digestive Physiology, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jones MP, Browning K, Corsetti M, Keszthelyi D, Shin A, Singh R, Visaggi P, Zerbib F. Appropriate use of p-values. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14664. [PMID: 37691548 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Jones
- School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsteen Browning
- Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maura Corsetti
- NIHR Nottingham BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Daniel Keszthelyi
- Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Shin
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rajan Singh
- Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA
- School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Le Cosquer G, Capirchio L, Rivière P, Denis MA, Poullenot F, Remue C, Zerbib F, Leonard D, Célérier B, Kartheuser A, Laharie D, Dewit O. Time trend in surgical indications and outcomes in ulcerative colitis-A two decades in-depth retrospective analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1338-1344. [PMID: 37029063 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent data regarding the impact of biologics and new surgical techniques on the indications and outcomes of colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited. AIMS The present study aimed at determining the trend of colectomy in UC by comparing colectomy indications and outcomes between 2000 and 2010 and 2011-2020. METHODS This observational retrospective study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals, including consecutive patients who underwent colectomy between 2000 and 2020. All data concerning UC history, treatment and surgeries were collected. RESULTS Among the 286 patients included, 87 underwent colectomy in 2001-2010 and 199 in 2011-2020. Patients' characteristics were similar between groups, except for prior biologic exposure (50.6 % vs. 74.9%; p<0.001). The indications of colectomy significantly decreased for refractory UC (50.6 % vs. 37.7%; p = 0.042), but were similar for acute severe UC (36.8 % vs. 42.2%; p = 0.390) and (pre)neoplastic lesions (12.6 % vs. 20.1%; p = 0.130). A widespread use of laparoscopy (47.7 % vs. 81.4%; p<0.001) was associated with fewer early complications (12.6 % vs. 5.5%; p = 0.038). CONCLUSION Over the last two decades, the proportion of surgery for refractory UC significantly decreased compared to other surgical indications while surgical outcomes improved despite larger exposure to biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Le Cosquer
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque; Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lena Capirchio
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pauline Rivière
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque; Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marie Armelle Denis
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Florian Poullenot
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque; Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christophe Remue
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque; Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Daniel Leonard
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bertrand Célérier
- Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France
| | - Alex Kartheuser
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Laharie
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque; Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Dewit
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corsetti M, Shin A, Black C, Keszthelyi D, Christofi FL, Zerbib F, Browning K, Jones M. Neurogastroenterology and Motility gets younger! Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14665. [PMID: 37702198 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Shin
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | | | | | - Fedias L Christofi
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Physiology & Cell Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Jones
- Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rivière P, Le Chevillier A, Rullier A, Marty M, Schurr E, Lapuyade B, Célerier B, Fernandez B, Bessissow T, Treton X, Uzzan M, Poullenot F, Berger A, Zerbib F, Laharie D. Deep ulcers are associated with increased C-reactive protein in active ulcerative colitis. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1194-1200. [PMID: 37244790 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased C-reactive protein (CRP) is used to diagnose and predict response to treatment in acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC). AIMS To investigate the connection between CRP elevation and deep ulcers in UC. METHODS Patients with active UC were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort and a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing colectomy from 2012 to 2019. RESULTS Forty-one (9 (22%) with deep ulcers) patients were included in the prospective cohort: 4/5 (80%) patients with CRP > 100 mg/L, 2/10 (20%) patients with CRP between 30 and 100 mg/L and 3/26 (12%) patients with CRP < 30 mg/L had deep ulcers (p = 0.006). In the retrospective cohort [46 patients (31 (67%) with deep ulcers)], 14/14 (100%) patients with CRP > 100 mg/L, 11/17 (65%) patients with CRP between 30 and 100 mg/l and 6/15 (40%) patients with CRP < 30 mg/L had deep ulcers (p = 0.001). Positive predictive value of CRP > 100 mg/l for presence of deep ulcers was 80% and 100% in both cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CRP elevation is a robust surrogate marker for presence of deep ulcers in UC. Elevated CRP or presence of deep ulcers could influence the choice of medical therapy in acute severe UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Rivière
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France; Program in Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - A Le Chevillier
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Rullier
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin, Pathology department - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
| | - M Marty
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pathology department - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
| | - E Schurr
- Program in Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - B Lapuyade
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Radiology department - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
| | - B Célerier
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Abdominal surgery department - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
| | - B Fernandez
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Abdominal surgery department - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
| | - T Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology and hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - X Treton
- Paris IBD Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, 25 bd Victor Hugo, Neuilly/Seine 92200, France
| | - M Uzzan
- Paris Est Créteil University UPEC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Gastroenterology department, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs, Créteil F-94010, France
| | - F Poullenot
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Berger
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - D Laharie
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vitton V, Mion F, Leroi AM, Brochard C, Coffin B, Zerbib F, Damon H, Melchior C, Duboc H, Queralto M, Baumstarck K. Interferential therapy for chronic constipation in adults: The CON-COUR randomizedcontrolled trial. United European Gastroenterol J 2023. [PMID: 37186357 PMCID: PMC10165323 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic constipation (CC) is a frequent condition, and the first-line treatment includes dietary rules, the use of laxatives, and biofeedback for evacuation disorders. However, almost half of the patients are dissatisfied with their current treatment. We report the first double-blind randomized multicenter trial assessing the effectiveness of transabdominal electrical stimulation by interferential therapy (IFT) in the treatment of CC in adults. METHODS A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial was conducted at 7 centers in France. The primary endpoint was 8-week efficacy as defined by the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements during the last 4 weeks of the 8-week stimulation period. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the effects of IFT on symptoms (Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnair (PAC-SYM)), quality of life (QOL) (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life), Colonic transit time (CTT), anorectal manometry, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS The proportion of 8-week responders was not significantly different between the two groups (73.2% in the IFT group vs. 67.1% in the sham group). After 8 weeks of stimulation, the mean overall PAC-SYM score and the mean reduction in the overall PAC-SYM score were significantly greater in the IFT group than in the sham group. No differences were observed concerning CTT, anorectal manometry, or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Although the primary endpoint was not reached, IFT can significantly alleviate the symptoms and improve the QOL of CC patients. It can be assumed that new treatments require different modes of evaluation and that the assessment of patient-reported outcomes may become a priority among therapeutic targets of CC. Trial registration number NCT02381665.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronique Vitton
- Gastroenterology Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - François Mion
- Digestive Physiology Department, Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM U1032, Lyon, France
| | - Anne-Marie Leroi
- Digestive Physiology Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
- Nutrition, Brain and Gut Laboratory UMR 1073, Rouen University, Rouen, France
- Rouen University Hospital, INSERM CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen, France
| | - Charlène Brochard
- Digestive Physiology Unit, University Hospital of Rennes, University of Rennes 1, CIC 1414, Rennes, France
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Gastroenterology Department, DMU ESPRIT, Hôpital Louis-Mourier, Colombes, France
- University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France
| | - Henri Damon
- Digestive Physiology Department, Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM U1032, Lyon, France
| | - Chloé Melchior
- Digestive Physiology Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Henri Duboc
- Gastroenterology Department, DMU ESPRIT, Hôpital Louis-Mourier, Colombes, France
- University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Michel Queralto
- Service de Colo-Proctologie, Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France
| | - Karine Baumstarck
- Service d'Epidémiologie et Economie en Santé, Direction de la Recherche en Santé, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Corsetti M, Zerbib F, Black C, Shin A, Browning K, Chistofi F, Keszthelyi D. News from the Editors. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14590. [PMID: 37010910 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Fedias Chistofi
- Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gourcerol G, Gonzalez JM, Bonaz B, Fontaine S, Zerbib F, Mion F, Basile P, Gillibert A, Labonde A, Soliman H, Vitton V, Coffin B, Jacques J. Gastric electrical stimulation versus per-oral pyloromyotomy for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with gastroparesis: An observational study of two cohorts. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023:e14565. [PMID: 36961085 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both gastric electrical stimulation (GES) and gastric-peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) can be offered to patients with gastroparesis and predominant nausea and vomiting. The study's aim was to compare GES and G-POEM efficacy on nausea and vomiting scores in patients with gastroparesis. METHODS Two multicenter cohorts of patients with medically refractory gastroparesis with predominant nausea and vomiting (defined as a score >2 on nausea and vomiting subscale that varied from 0 to 4) were treated either with GES (n = 34) or G-POEM (n = 30) and were followed for 24 months (M). Clinical response was defined as a decrease of ≥1 point in nausea and vomiting subscale without premature exclusion due to switch from one to the other technique before M24. Changes in symptomatic scales and quality of life were also monitored. KEY RESULTS Patients from both groups were comparable although the mean score of nausea and vomiting subscale was higher in GES (3.0) compared to G-POEM group (2.6; p = 0.01). At M24, clinical response was achieved in 21/34 (61.7%) patients with GES and in 21/30 (70.0%; p = 0.60) patients with G-POEM. Mean scores of nausea and vomiting subscale decreased at M24 in both GES (from 3.0 to 1.6; p < 0.001) and G-POEM (from 2.6 to 1.2; p < 0.001) groups, although there was no difference between groups (difference adjusted from baseline: -0.28 [-0.77; 0.19]; p = 0.24). Likewise, symptomatic and quality of life scores improved at M24 in both groups, without difference according to treatment group. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES At M24, we did not observe significant difference in efficacy of GES and G-POEM in medically refractory gastroparesis with predominant nausea and vomiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Gourcerol
- Physiology and Gastroenterology Department, INSERM 1073-CIC 1404, RouenUniversity Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | | - Bruno Bonaz
- Gastroenterology Department CHU, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, INSERM CIC 1401, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Paul Basile
- Physiology and Gastroenterology Department, INSERM 1073-CIC 1404, RouenUniversity Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - André Gillibert
- Biostatistic Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | | - Heithem Soliman
- Gastroenterology Department, Université de Paris, AP-HP, Hopital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Colombes, France
| | - Véronique Vitton
- Gastroenterology Department, North Hospital AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Gastroenterology Department, Université de Paris, AP-HP, Hopital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Colombes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Masson E, Ewers M, Paliwal S, Kume K, Scotet V, Cooper DN, Rebours V, Buscail L, Rouault K, Abrantes A, Aguilera Munoz L, Albouys J, Alric L, Amiot X, Archambeaud I, Audiau S, Bastide L, Baudon J, Bellaiche G, Bellon S, Bertrand V, Bideau K, Billiemaz K, Billioud C, Bonnefoy S, Borderon C, Bournet B, Breton E, Brugel M, Buscail L, Cadiot G, Camus M, Carpentier-Pourquier M, Chamouard P, Chaput U, Chen JM, Cholet F, Ciocan DM, Clavel C, Coffin B, Coimet-Berger L, Cosconea S, Creveaux I, Culetto A, Daboussi O, De Mestier L, Degand T, D'engremont C, Denis B, Dermine S, Drouet D'Aubigny A, Enaud R, Fabre A, Férec C, Gargot D, Gelsi E, Gentilcore E, Gincul R, Ginglinger-Favre E, Giovannini M, Gomercic C, Gondran H, Grainville T, Grandval P, Grasset D, Grimaldi S, Grimbert S, Hagege H, Heissat S, Hentic O, Herber-Mayne A, Hervouet M, Hoibian S, Jacques J, Jais B, Kaassis M, Koch S, Lacaze E, Lacroute J, Lamireau T, Laurent L, Le Guillou X, Le Rhun M, Leblanc S, Levy P, Lievre A, Lorenzo D, Maire F, Marcel K, Masson E, Mauillon J, Morgant S, Moussata D, Muller N, Nambot S, Napoleon B, Olivier A, Pagenault M, Pelletier AL, Pennec O, Pinard F, Pioche M, Prost B, Queneherve L, Rebours V, Reboux N, Rekik S, Riachi G, Rohmer B, Roquelaure B, Rosa Hezode I, Rostain F, Saurin JC, Servais L, Stan-Iuga R, Subtil C, Tanneche J, Texier C, Thomassin L, Tougeron D, Vuitton L, Wallenhorst T, Wangerme M, Zanaldi H, Zerbib F, Bhaskar S, Kikuta K, Rao GV, Hamada S, Reddy DN, Masamune A, Chandak GR, Witt H, Férec C, Chen JM. The PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion copy number variant modifies risk for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2023; 23:48-56. [PMID: 36517351 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PRSS1 and PRSS2 constitute the only functional copies of a tandemly-arranged five-trypsinogen-gene cluster (i.e., PRSS1, PRSS3P1, PRSS3P2, TRY7 and PRSS2) on chromosome 7q35. Variants in PRSS1 and PRSS2, including missense and copy number variants (CNVs), have been reported to predispose to or protect against chronic pancreatitis (CP). We wondered whether a common trypsinogen pseudogene deletion CNV (that removes two of the three trypsinogen pseudogenes, PRSS3P2 and TRY7) might be associated with CP causation/predisposition. METHODS We analyzed the common PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion CNV in a total of 1536 CP patients and 3506 controls from France, Germany, India and Japan by means of quantitative fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS We demonstrated that the deletion CNV variant was associated with a protective effect against CP in the French, German and Japanese cohorts whilst a trend toward the same association was noted in the Indian cohort. Meta-analysis under a dominant model yielded a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005) whereas an allele-based meta-analysis yielded a pooled OR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.92; p = 0.0001). This protective effect is explicable by reference to the recent finding that the still functional PRSS3P2/TRY7 pseudogene enhancers upregulate pancreatic PRSS2 expression. CONCLUSIONS The common PRSS3P2 and TRY7 deletion CNV was associated with a reduced risk for CP. This finding provides additional support for the emerging view that dysregulated PRSS2 expression represents a discrete mechanism underlying CP predisposition or protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Masson
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, F-29200, Brest, France; Service de Génétique Médicale et de Biologie de la Reproduction, CHRU Brest, F-29200, Brest, France
| | - Maren Ewers
- Paediatric Nutritional Medicine & Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine (EKFZ), Technical University Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany
| | - Sumit Paliwal
- Genomic Research on Complex Diseases (GRC Group), CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Kiyoshi Kume
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Virginie Scotet
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, F-29200, Brest, France
| | - David N Cooper
- Institute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Vinciane Rebours
- Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology Department, Beaujon Hospital, APHP - Clichy, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Louis Buscail
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU Rangueil and University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Karen Rouault
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, F-29200, Brest, France; Service de Génétique Médicale et de Biologie de la Reproduction, CHRU Brest, F-29200, Brest, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Hervouet
- Hôpital d'instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Seema Bhaskar
- Genomic Research on Complex Diseases (GRC Group), CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Kazuhiro Kikuta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | | | - Shin Hamada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | | | - Atsushi Masamune
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Giriraj Ratan Chandak
- Genomic Research on Complex Diseases (GRC Group), CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Heiko Witt
- Paediatric Nutritional Medicine & Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine (EKFZ), Technical University Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany
| | - Claude Férec
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, F-29200, Brest, France
| | - Jian-Min Chen
- Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, F-29200, Brest, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rivière P, Kanters C, Pellet G, Ni A, Hupé M, Aboulhamid N, Poullenot F, Bitton A, Zerbib F, Lakatos PL, Afif W, Laharie D, Bessissow T. Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF Agent as First-Line Biological Therapy in Luminal Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Study From 2 Referral Centers. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022:6653347. [PMID: 35917111 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-life data on the efficacy of ustekinumab as first-line therapy for the treatment of luminal Crohn's disease (CD) compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are lacking. We compared the clinical response rates at 3 months in 2 cohorts of biologic-naïve patients treated by ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents. METHODS Biologic-naïve patients starting either ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for luminal CD between 2016 and 2019 in 2 tertiary centers were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was clinical response at 3 months, defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw Index <4 or a 3-point drop in the score without steroids, need for CD-related surgery, or treatment discontinuation owing to failure or intolerance. Patients treated with ustekinumab were matched to patients receiving anti-TNF agents by a propensity score algorithm. RESULTS We included 156 patients starting anti-TNF agents (95 adalimumab and 61 infliximab) and 50 ustekinumab. After matching, clinical response rates at 3 months were 64% and 86% in the ustekinumab and anti-TNF groups, respectively (P = .01). At 12 months, in multivariate analysis adjusted for disease duration, location, concomitant immunosuppressant and steroids, and symptoms, clinical remission was independently associated with the biological therapy received (odds ratio, 2.6 for anti-TNF agent vs ustekinumab; P = .02). With a median follow-up duration of 40 (interquartile range, 23-52) months, no difference was observed in terms of time to drug withdrawal (P = .29) or safety. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective real-world data suggest that an anti-TNF agent as a first-line biological therapy is associated with higher rates of response at 3 months than ustekinumab in patients with CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Rivière
- INSERM CIC 1401, Gastroenterology Department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Caitlyn Kanters
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gauthier Pellet
- INSERM CIC 1401, Gastroenterology Department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Alexander Ni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marianne Hupé
- INSERM CIC 1401, Gastroenterology Department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nesrine Aboulhamid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Florian Poullenot
- INSERM CIC 1401, Gastroenterology Department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Alain Bitton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frank Zerbib
- INSERM CIC 1401, Gastroenterology Department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Waqqas Afif
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Laharie
- INSERM CIC 1401, Gastroenterology Department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Le Cosquer G, Grangeon L, Rivière P, Berger A, Zerbib F, Laharie D, Poullenot F. A single dedicated vaccination visit improves vaccination coverage of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221082879. [PMID: 35493617 PMCID: PMC9039447 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221082879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients treated with biologics for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of severe infections. Real-life vaccination coverage in this population remains low despite international vaccination guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dedicated vaccination visit on vaccination coverage. METHODS A dedicated vaccination visit was offered to all patients admitted for an infusion of a biologic in a tertiary IBD center during a 4-week period. At baseline, vaccination status was collected. Patients received specific information on recommended vaccinations. Perceived utility of both vaccination and the dedicated visit were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). Vaccination coverage was reassessed 6 months later by phone call. RESULTS Among the 207 patients analyzed (1 patient declined), rates of vaccination at baseline and 6 months later against diphtheria were 52.7% and 68.6% (p < 0.001), tetanus 55.1% and 70% (p < 0.001), poliomyelitis 51.7% and 68.6% (p < 0.001), pertussis 33.3% and 51.2% (p < 0.001), hepatitis B virus (HBV) 61.4% and 66.7% (p < 0.01), pneumococcus 15.5% and 42.0% (p < 0.001), influenza 29.5% and 36.2% (p < 0.01), and meningococcus C 11.6% and 13.0% (p = 0.083), respectively. A quarter of the patients declined at least one recommended vaccination after the visit. The main reason for this refusal was distrust toward one or more vaccines. CONCLUSION A single visit dedicated to vaccination significantly increases rates of vaccination in patients with IBD treated with biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Le Cosquer
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d’Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lionel Grangeon
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d’Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pauline Rivière
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d’Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Arthur Berger
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d’Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d’Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - David Laharie
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d’Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Enaud R, Tetard C, Dupuis R, Laharie D, Lamireau T, Zerbib F, Rivière P, Shili-Mismoudi S, Poullenot F. Compliance with Gluten Free Diet Is Associated with Better Quality of Life in Celiac Disease. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14061210. [PMID: 35334866 PMCID: PMC8951042 DOI: 10.3390/nu14061210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The quality of life (QOL) of patients with celiac disease (CD) can be altered by both symptoms of the disease and by the restrictions of the gluten-free diet (GFD). The objective was to determine the factors associated with better QOL in a large cohort of CD patients. A link to an online survey was sent to the members of the French Association of Gluten Intolerant People (AFDIAG). The French-Celiac Disease Questionnaire (F-CDQ), scoring from 0 to 100, was used to measure the QOL. Other data collected were sociodemographic characteristics, information on CD, purchasing and consumption habits of gluten-free products, and a self-assessment scale (ranging from 0 to 10) to determine the compliance with the GFD. Among the 907 CD patients who returned the questionnaire, 787 were analyzed (638 women (81%); median age: 49 years; 71% with self-assessed GFD compliance > 8). Their median F-CDQ was 73 (range: 59−82). In multivariate analysis, the main factors associated with a better quality of life were the long duration of the GFD, good compliance with the GFD, and the number of follow-up visits. Compliance with and duration of the GFD are associated with a better quality of life in patients with CD. Taking this into consideration would offset its restrictive aspect and improve its adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Enaud
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital des Enfants, Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie Pédiatriques, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.E.); (C.T.); (T.L.)
| | - Candice Tetard
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital des Enfants, Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie Pédiatriques, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.E.); (C.T.); (T.L.)
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.D.); (D.L.); (F.Z.); (P.R.); (S.S.-M.)
| | - Raphaël Dupuis
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.D.); (D.L.); (F.Z.); (P.R.); (S.S.-M.)
| | - David Laharie
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.D.); (D.L.); (F.Z.); (P.R.); (S.S.-M.)
| | - Thierry Lamireau
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital des Enfants, Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie Pédiatriques, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.E.); (C.T.); (T.L.)
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.D.); (D.L.); (F.Z.); (P.R.); (S.S.-M.)
| | - Pauline Rivière
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.D.); (D.L.); (F.Z.); (P.R.); (S.S.-M.)
| | - Sarah Shili-Mismoudi
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.D.); (D.L.); (F.Z.); (P.R.); (S.S.-M.)
| | - Florian Poullenot
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (R.D.); (D.L.); (F.Z.); (P.R.); (S.S.-M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rogers BD, Cisternas D, Rengarajan A, Marin I, Abrahao L, Hani A, Lequizamo AM, Remes-Troche JM, Perez de la Serna J, Ruiz de Leon A, Zerbib F, Serra J, Gyawali CP. Breaks in peristaltic integrity predict abnormal esophageal bolus clearance better than contraction vigor or residual pressure at the esophagogastric junction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14141. [PMID: 33772977 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) evaluates esophageal peristalsis and bolus transit. We used esophageal impedance integral (EII), the ratio between bolus presence before and after an expected peristaltic wave, to evaluate predictors of bolus transit. METHODS From HRIM studies performed on 61 healthy volunteers (median age 27 years, 48%F), standard metrics were extracted from each of 10 supine water swallows: distal contractile integral (DCI, mmHg cm s), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP, mmHg), and breaks in peristaltic integrity (cm, using 20 mmHg isobaric contour). Pressure and impedance coordinates for each swallow were exported into a dedicated, python-based program for EII calculation (EII ratio ≥ 0.3 = abnormal bolus clearance). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess predictors of abnormal bolus clearance. KEY RESULTS Of 591 swallows, 80.9% were intact, 10.5% were weak, and 8.6% failed. Visual analysis overestimated abnormal bolus clearance compared to EII ratio (p ≤ 0.01). Bolus clearance was complete (median EII ratio 0.0, IQR 0-0.12) in 82.0% of intact swallows in contrast to 53.3% of weak swallows (EII ratio 0.29, IQR 0.0-0.57), and 19.6% of failed swallows (EII ratio 0.5, IQR 0.34-0.73, p < 0.001). EII correlated best with break length (ρ = 0.52, p < 0.001), compared to IRP (ρ: -0.17) or DCI (ρ: -0.42). On ROC analysis, breaks predicted abnormal bolus transit better than DCI or IRP (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.25 vs. 0.44, p ≤ 0.03 for each). On logistic regression, breaks remained independently predictive of abnormal bolus transit (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Breaks in peristaltic integrity predict abnormal bolus clearance better than DCI or IRP in healthy asymptomatic subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Rogers
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Arvind Rengarajan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ingrid Marin
- Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Luiz Abrahao
- University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Albis Hani
- Departamento de Gastroenterologíay Laboratorio de Motilidad, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ana M Lequizamo
- Departamento de Gastroenterologíay Laboratorio de Motilidad, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - José M Remes-Troche
- Digestive Physiology and Motility Lab, Medical Biological Research Institute, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - Julio Perez de la Serna
- Unidad de Motilidad, Servicio de Aparto Digestivo, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Ruiz de Leon
- Unidad de Motilidad, Servicio de Aparto Digestivo, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jordi Serra
- Digestive System Research Unit, Centro de Investigación Biomedical en Red enfermedades hepáticas y digestivas (CIBERehd), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Castinel J, Pellet G, Laharie D, Zerbib F, Silvain C, Wilsius E, Kerlogot L, Rivière P, Poullenot F. MALE GENDER IS ASSOCIATED WITH INFORMAL CAREGIVER BURDEN IN CHRONIC INTESTINAL FAILURE PATIENTS TREATED WITH HOME PARENTERAL NUTRITION. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2022; 46:1593-1601. [DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Castinel
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
- CHU de Poitiers, Hepato‐Gastroenterology Department; Université de Poitiers Poitiers France
| | - Gauthier Pellet
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
| | - David Laharie
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
| | - Christine Silvain
- CHU de Poitiers, Hepato‐Gastroenterology Department; Université de Poitiers Poitiers France
| | - Eva Wilsius
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
| | - Laurianne Kerlogot
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
| | - Pauline Rivière
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
| | - Florian Poullenot
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico‐chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut‐Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401 Bordeaux France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zerbib F. Diagnosis of GORD: is the 'grey area' expanding? Gut 2021; 70:2221-2222. [PMID: 33608420 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology department, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, Aquitaine, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rettura F, Bronzini F, Campigotto M, Lambiase C, Pancetti A, Berti G, Marchi S, de Bortoli N, Zerbib F, Savarino E, Bellini M. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Management Update. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:765061. [PMID: 34790683 PMCID: PMC8591082 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequent gastrointestinal disorders. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in healing lesions and improving symptoms in most cases, although up to 40% of GERD patients do not respond adequately to PPI therapy. Refractory GERD (rGERD) is one of the most challenging problems, given its impact on the quality of life and consumption of health care resources. The definition of rGERD is a controversial topic as it has not been unequivocally established. Indeed, some patients unresponsive to PPIs who experience symptoms potentially related to GERD may not have GERD; in this case the definition could be replaced with “reflux-like PPI-refractory symptoms.” Patients with persistent reflux-like symptoms should undergo a diagnostic workup aimed at finding objective evidence of GERD through endoscopic and pH-impedance investigations. The management strategies regarding rGERD, apart from a careful check of patient's compliance with PPIs, a possible change in the timing of their administration and the choice of a PPI with a different metabolic pathway, include other pharmacologic treatments. These include histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), alginates, antacids and mucosal protective agents, potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs), prokinetics, gamma aminobutyric acid-B (GABA-B) receptor agonists and metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 (mGluR5) antagonists, and pain modulators. If there is no benefit from medical therapy, but there is objective evidence of GERD, invasive antireflux options should be evaluated after having carefully explained the risks and benefits to the patient. The most widely performed invasive antireflux option remains laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), even if other, less invasive, interventions have been suggested in the last few decades, including endoscopic transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX) or radiofrequency therapy (Stretta). Due to the different mechanisms underlying rGERD, the most effective strategy can vary, and it should be tailored to each patient. The aim of this paper is to review the different management options available to successfully deal with rGERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Rettura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Bronzini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Michele Campigotto
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Christian Lambiase
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Pancetti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ginevra Berti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Santino Marchi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gyawali CP, Tutuian R, Zerbib F, Rogers BD, Frazzoni M, Roman S, Savarino E, de Bortoli N, Vela MF, Sifrim D. Value of pH Impedance Monitoring While on Twice-Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy to Identify Need for Escalation of Reflux Management. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:1412-1422. [PMID: 34270955 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Acid exposure time (AET) and reflux episode thresholds from the Lyon Consensus may not apply for pH impedance studies performed while on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. We aimed to determine metrics from "on PPI" pH impedance studies predicting need for escalation of therapy. METHODS De-identified pH impedance studies performed while on twice-daily PPI (Diversatek, Boulder, CO) in healthy volunteers (n = 66, median age 37.5 years, 43.9% female), and patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (European heartburn-predominant cohort: n = 43, median age 57.0 years, 55.8% female; North American regurgitation-predominant cohort: n = 42, median age 41.6 years, 42.9% female) were analyzed. Median values and interquartile ranges for pH impedance metrics in healthy volunteers were compared with proven GERD patients with and without 50% symptom improvement on validated measures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses identified optimal thresholds predicting symptom response. RESULTS Both conventional and novel reflux metrics were similar between PPI responders and nonresponders (P ≥ .1 for each) despite differences from healthy volunteers. Combinations of metrics associated with conclusively abnormal reflux burden (AET >4%, >80 reflux episodes) were seen in 32.6% and 40.5% of heartburn and regurgitation-predominant patients, respectively, 57.1% and 82.4% of whom reported nonresponse; and 85% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. On ROC analysis, AET threshold of 0.5% modestly predicted nonresponse (sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.51; P = .22), and 40 reflux episodes had better performance characteristics (sensitivity, 0.80; specificity, 0.51; P = .002); 79% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. CONCLUSION Combinations of abnormal "on PPI" pH impedance metrics are associated with PPI nonresponse in proven GERD patients, and can be targeted for treatment escalation, including surgery, particularly in regurgitation-predominant GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
| | - Radu Tutuian
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Clinics for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Benjamin D Rogers
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Department of Specialized Medicine, Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; Laboratory of Therapeutic Applications of Ultrasound, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1032, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marcelo F Vela
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harji D, Fernandez B, Boissieras L, Berger A, Capdepont M, Zerbib F, Rullier E, Denost Q. A novel bowel rehabilitation programme after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the BOREAL pilot study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2619-2626. [PMID: 34264005 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer has a high prevalence, with an impact on long-term bowel dysfunction and quality of life. We designed the bowel rehabilitation programme (BOREAL) as a proactive strategy to assess and treat patients with LARS. The BOREAL programme consists of a stepwise approach of escalating treatments: medical management (steps 0-1), pelvic floor physiotherapy, biofeedback and transanal irrigation (step 2), sacral nerve neuromodulation (step 3), percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy and anterograde enema (step 4) and definitive colostomy (step 5). METHODS A pilot study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of collecting LARS data routinely with the parallel implementation of the BOREAL programme. All patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between February 2017 and March 2019 were included. LARS was assessed using the LARS score and the Wexner Faecal Incontinence score at 30 days and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively. A good functional result was considered to be a combined LARS score <20 and/or a Wexner score <4. RESULTS In all, 137 patients were included. Overall compliance with the BOREAL programme was 72.9%. Major LARS decreased from 48% at 30 days postoperatively to 12% at 12 months, with a concomitant improvement in overall good function from 33% to 77%, P < 0.001. The majority of patients (n = 106, 77%) required medical management of their LARS. CONCLUSION The BOREAL programme demonstrates the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a responsive, stepwise programme for detecting and treating LARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deena Harji
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Benjamin Fernandez
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Lara Boissieras
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Arthur Berger
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Maylis Capdepont
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Rullier
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Quentin Denost
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, Anastasiou F, Bredenoord AJ, Corsetti M, Lagergren J, Mendive J, Nelson S, Roman S, Zerbib F, Hungin P. The tapestry of reflux syndromes: translating new insight into clinical practice. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:470-473. [PMID: 34593403 PMCID: PMC8463155 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21x717329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Foteini Anastasiou
- 4th Local Primary Health Care Unit, Academic Unit of Heraklion, Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, University of Crete, Greece
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maura Corsetti
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK; Professor and Consultant of Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Juan Mendive
- La Mina Primary Care Academic Health Centre, University of Barcelona, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sophie Nelson
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sabine Roman
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pali Hungin
- Primary Care and General Practice, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wauters L, Dickman R, Drug V, Mulak A, Serra J, Enck P, Tack J, Accarino A, Barbara G, Bor S, Coffin B, Corsetti M, De Schepper H, Dumitrascu D, Farmer A, Gourcerol G, Hauser G, Hausken T, Karamanolis G, Keszthelyi D, Malagelada C, Milosavljevic T, Muris J, O'Morain C, Papathanasopoulos A, Pohl D, Rumyantseva D, Sarnelli G, Savarino E, Schol J, Sheptulin A, Smet A, Stengel A, Storonova O, Storr M, Törnblom H, Vanuytsel T, Velosa M, Waluga M, Zarate N, Zerbib F. United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on functional dyspepsia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14238. [PMID: 34586707 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common conditions in clinical practice. In spite of its prevalence, FD is associated with major uncertainties in terms of its definition, underlying pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. METHODS A Delphi consensus was initiated with 41 experts from 22 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 87 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 36 statements. RESULTS The panel agreed with the definition in terms of its cardinal symptoms (early satiation, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning), its subdivision into epigastric pain syndrome and postprandial distress syndrome, and the presence of accessory symptoms (upper abdominal bloating, nausea, belching), and overlapping conditions. Also, well accepted are the female predominance of FD, its impact on quality of life and health costs, and acute gastrointestinal infections, and anxiety as risk factors. In terms of pathophysiological mechanisms, the consensus supports a role for impaired gastric accommodation, delayed gastric emptying, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, Helicobacter pylori infection, and altered central processing of signals from the gastroduodenal region. There is consensus that endoscopy is mandatory for establishing a firm diagnosis of FD, but that in primary care, patients without alarm symptoms or risk factors can be managed without endoscopy. There is consensus that H. pylori status should be determined in every patient with dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori positive patients should receive eradication therapy. Also, proton pump inhibitor therapy is considered an effective therapy for FD, but no other treatment approach reached a consensus. The long-term prognosis and life expectancy are favorable. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on the definition, diagnosis and management of FD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Wauters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ram Dickman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikwa, Israel
| | - Vasile Drug
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Gr T Popa Iasi and University Hospital St Spiridon, Iasi, Romania
| | - Agata Mulak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jordi Serra
- University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Badalona, Spain
| | - Paul Enck
- Department of Internal Medicine VI: Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jan Tack
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Anna Accarino
- CIBERehd and Departament de Medicina, Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giovanni Barbara
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Serhat Bor
- Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Université de Paris and AP-HP Hôpital Louis Mourier, Paris, France
| | - Maura Corsetti
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heiko De Schepper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dan Dumitrascu
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Adam Farmer
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Goran Hauser
- Medical Faculty Rijeka, University of Rijeka and Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Trygve Hausken
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - George Karamanolis
- Gastroentrology Unit, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Daniel Keszthelyi
- Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carolin Malagelada
- CIBERehd and Departament de Medicina, Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jean Muris
- Department of General Practice, Caphri Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Colm O'Morain
- Department of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin and National Clinical Lead for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal College Physicians Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Daniel Pohl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Diana Rumyantseva
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Giovanni Sarnelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Departmento of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Jolien Schol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arkady Sheptulin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Annemieke Smet
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and InflA-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, and Charité Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Tübingen, Germany
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Center of Endoscopy, Starnberg, Germany
- Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Olga Storonova
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Martin Storr
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans Törnblom
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Tim Vanuytsel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Marek Waluga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Natalia Zarate
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque and Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rivière P, Vauquelin B, Rolland E, Melchior C, Roman S, Bruley des Varannes S, Mion F, Gourcerol G, Sacher-Huvelin S, Zerbib F. Low FODMAPs diet or usual dietary advice for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: An open-labeled randomized trial. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14181. [PMID: 34051134 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The low FODMAPs (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet improves lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients suffering from proton pump inhibitor (PPI) refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have limited treatment options. We investigated the efficacy of a low FODMAPs diet in patients with PPI refractory GERD. METHODS This multicenter, randomized, open-label study compared the efficacy of a 4-week low FODMAPs diet and usual dietary advice (ie, low-fat diet and head of bed elevation) in patients with symptomatic PPI refractory GERD, defined by a Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score >3 and abnormal pH-impedance monitoring on PPIs. The primary endpoint was the percentage of responders (RDQ ≤3) at the end of the diet. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (55% women, median age 45 years) were included, 16 randomized in the low FODMAPs diet group and 15 in the usual dietary advice group. Adherence to the assigned diet was good, with a significant difference in the FODMAPs intake per day between the low FODMAPs diet (2.5 g) and the usual dietary advice group (13 g) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in response rates (RDQ score ≤3) between the low FODMAPs diet (6/16, 37.5%) and usual dietary advice (3/15, 20%) groups (p = 0.43). Total RDQ score and dyspepsia subscore decreased significantly over time in both groups (p = 0.002), with no difference according to the assigned diet group (p = 0.85). CONCLUSION Low FODMAPs diet and usual dietary advice have similar but limited beneficial effects on symptoms in patients with PPI refractory GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Rivière
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Blandine Vauquelin
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emiliane Rolland
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Chloé Melchior
- Gastroenterology Department and INSERM CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France.,INSERM UMR 1073, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Normandy University, Rouen, France
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Stanislas Bruley des Varannes
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD CIC 1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - François Mion
- Digestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Gourcerol
- INSERM UMR 1073, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Normandy University, Rouen, France.,Physiology Department and INSERM CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France
| | - Sylvie Sacher-Huvelin
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD CIC 1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gyawali CP, Zerbib F, Bhatia S, Cisternas D, Coss-Adame E, Lazarescu A, Pohl D, Yadlapati R, Penagini R, Pandolfino J. Chicago Classification update (V4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and absent contractility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14134. [PMID: 33768698 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal hypomotility disorders manifest with abnormal esophageal body contraction vigor, breaks in peristaltic integrity, or failure of peristalsis in the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). The Chicago Classification version 4.0 recognizes two hypomotility disorders, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and absent contractility, while fragmented peristalsis has been incorporated into the IEM definition. Updated criteria for ineffective swallows consist of weak esophageal body contraction vigor measured using distal contractile integral (DCI, 100-450 mmHg·cm·s), transition zone defects >5 cm measured using a 20 mmHg isobaric contour, or failure of peristalsis (DCI < 100 mmHg·cm·s). More than 70% ineffective swallows and/or ≥50% failed swallows are required for a conclusive diagnosis of IEM. When the diagnosis is inconclusive (50%-70% ineffective swallows), supplementary evidence from multiple rapid swallows (absence of contraction reserve), barium radiography (abnormal bolus clearance), or HRM with impedance (abnormal bolus clearance) could support a diagnosis of IEM. Absent contractility requires 100% failed peristalsis, consistent with previous versions of the classification. Consideration needs to be given for the possibility of achalasia in absent contractility with dysphagia despite normal IRP, and alternate complementary tests (including timed upright barium esophagram and functional lumen imaging probe) are recommended to confirm or refute the presence of achalasia. Future research to quantify esophageal bolus retention on stationary HRM with impedance and to understand contraction vigor thresholds that predict bolus clearance will provide further refinement to diagnostic criteria for esophageal hypomotility disorders in future iterations of the Chicago Classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Shobna Bhatia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Enrique Coss-Adame
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición, Salvador Zubirán, Tlalpan, Mexico
| | - Adriana Lazarescu
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Daniel Pohl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - John Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rogers BD, Rengarajan A, Abrahao L, Bhatia S, Bor S, Carlson DA, Cisternas D, Gonlachanvit S, Hani A, Hayat J, Kawamura O, Lee YY, Leguizamo AM, Pauwels A, de la Serna JP, Ramos RI, Remes-Troche JM, Roman S, Savarino E, Serra J, Sifrim D, Tolone S, Wong Z, Zerbib F, Pandolfino J, Gyawali CP. Esophagogastric junction morphology and contractile integral on high-resolution manometry in asymptomatic healthy volunteers: An international multicenter study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14009. [PMID: 33094875 PMCID: PMC9380029 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and EGJ morphology are high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics that assess EGJ barrier function. Normative data standardized across world regions and HRM manufacturers are limited. METHODS Our aim was to determine normative EGJ metrics in a large international cohort of healthy volunteers undergoing HRM (Medtronic, Laborie, and Diversatek software) acquired from 16 countries in four world regions. EGJ-CI was calculated by the same two investigators using a distal contractile integral-like measurement across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles and corrected for respiration (mm Hg cm), using manufacturer-specific software tools. EGJ morphology was designated according to Chicago Classification v3.0. Median EGJ-CI values were calculated across age, genders, HRM systems, and regions. RESULTS Of 484 studies (28.0 years, 56.2% F, 60.7% Medtronic studies, 26.0% Laborie, and 13.2% Diversatek), EGJ morphology was type 1 in 97.1%. Median EGJ-CI was similar between Medtronic (37.0 mm Hg cm, IQR 23.6-53.7 mm Hg cm) and Diversatek (34.9 mm Hg cm, IQR 22.1-56.1 mm Hg cm, P = 0.87), but was significantly higher using Laborie equipment (56.5 mm Hg cm, IQR 35.0-75.3 mm Hg cm, P < 0.001). 5th percentile EGJ-CI values ranged from 6.9 to 12.1 mm Hg cm. EGJ-CI values were consistent across world regions, but different between manufacturers even within the same world region (P ≤ 0.001). Within Medtronic studies, EGJ-CI and basal LESP were similar in younger and older individuals (P ≥ 0.3) but higher in women (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS EGJ morphology is predominantly type 1 in healthy adults. EGJ-CI varies widely in health, with significant gender influence, but is consistent within each HRM system. Manufacturer-specific normative values should be utilized for clinical HRM interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D. Rogers
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Arvind Rengarajan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Luiz Abrahao
- University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Shobna Bhatia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Serhat Bor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Dustin A. Carlson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Sutep Gonlachanvit
- Center of Excellence on Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Albis Hani
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Laboratorio de Motilidad, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jamal Hayat
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Osamu Kawamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kamimoku SPA Hospital, Minakami, Gunma, Japan
| | - Yeung Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia,Gut Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ana Maria Leguizamo
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Laboratorio de Motilidad, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ans Pauwels
- Department of Gastroenterology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julio Perez de la Serna
- Unidad de Motilidad, Servicio de Aparto Digestivo, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa I. Ramos
- Motility Lab, Department of Gastroenterology, British Hospital and El Cruce Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jose Maria Remes-Troche
- Digestive Physiology and Motility Lab, Medical Biological Research Institute, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, México
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hopital E Herriot, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France,Digestive Physiology, Université de Lyon, Lyon I University, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Jordi Serra
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol. CIBERehd, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Upper GI Physiology Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Salvatore Tolone
- General, Mininvasive and Bariatric Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Zhiqin Wong
- Gut Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - John Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - C. Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Laharie D, Bourreille A, Branche J, Allez M, Bouhnik Y, Filippi J, Zerbib F, Savoye G, Vuitton L, Moreau J, Amiot A, Beaugerie L, Ricart E, Dewit O, Lopez-Sanroman A, Fumery M, Carbonnel F, Buisson A, Coffin B, Roblin X, van Assche G, Esteve M, Farkkila M, Gisbert JP, Marteau P, Nahon S, de Vos M, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Mary JY. Evolution of Endoscopic Lesions in Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Responding to Infliximab or Cyclosporine. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1180-1188.e4. [PMID: 32777552 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Few data on the evolution of endoscopic findings are available in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). The aim of this study was to describe this evolution in a prospective cohort. METHODS Patients admitted for a steroid-refractory ASUC and included in a randomized trial comparing infliximab and cyclosporine were eligible if they achieved steroid-free clinical remission at day 98. Flexible sigmoidoscopies were performed at baseline, days 7, 42 and 98. Ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) and its sub-scores - vascular pattern, bleeding and ulceration/erosion - were post-hoc calculated. Global endoscopic remission was defined by a UCEIS of 0, and partial endoscopic remission by any UCEIS sub-score of 0. RESULTS Among the 55 patients analyzed (29 infliximab and 26 cyclosporine), 49 (83%) had UCEIS ≥6 at baseline at baseline. Partial endoscopic remission rates were higher for bleeding than for vascular pattern and for ulcerations/erosions at day 7 (20% vs. 4% and 5% (n = 55); p = .004 and p=.04), for bleeding and ulceration/erosion than for vascular pattern at day 42 [63% and 65% vs. 33% (n=54); p<.001 for both] and at day 98 [78% and 92% vs. 56% (n = 50); p = .007 and p < .001]. Global endoscopic remission rates at day 98 were higher in patients treated with infliximab than with cyclosporine [73% vs. 25% (n = 26 and 24); p < .001]. CONCLUSION In steroid-refractory ASUC patients responding to a second-line medical therapy, endoscopic remission process started with bleeding remission and was not achieved in half the patients at day 98 for vascular pattern. Infliximab provided a higher endoscopic remission rate than cyclosporine at day 98.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Laharie
- INSERM CIC 1401, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Arnaud Bourreille
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Julien Branche
- Service des maladies de l'appareil digestif-Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Matthieu Allez
- Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII, Paris, France
| | - Yoram Bouhnik
- Gastroentérologie, MICI et Assistance Nutritive, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII, Clichy, France
| | - Jerome Filippi
- Service de Gastroentérologie et Nutrition Clinique, Hôpital de l'Archet 2, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- INSERM CIC 1401, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Guillaume Savoye
- UMR 1073, Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, CHU de Rouen, Normandie Université-Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Lucine Vuitton
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Jacques Moreau
- Service de Gastro-entérologie et Nutrition, Hôpital Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Aurelien Amiot
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Laurent Beaugerie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Elena Ricart
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, Augus Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Dewit
- Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, UCL Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antonio Lopez-Sanroman
- Unidad de EII / IBD Unit, Servicio de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Peritox UMR I-01, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Franck Carbonnel
- Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Sud 11, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Anthony Buisson
- INSERM U1071, M2iSH, USC-INRA 2018, 3iHP, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Pôle Maladie Appareil Digestif, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII, Colombes, France
| | - Xavier Roblin
- Service de Gastro-entérologie et Hépatologie, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Gert van Assche
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria Esteve
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Martti Farkkila
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Philippe Marteau
- Service Hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Stephane Nahon
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, CHI Le Raincy Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France
| | - Martine de Vos
- Gastroenterology unit, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- INSERM U1256 NGERE, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mary
- INSERM UMR-S-1153, Equipe ECSTRA, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Barret M, Pioche M, Terris B, Ponchon T, Cholet F, Zerbib F, Chabrun E, Le Rhun M, Coron E, Giovannini M, Caillol F, Laugier R, Jacques J, Legros R, Boustiere C, Rahmi G, Metivier-Cesbron E, Vanbiervliet G, Bauret P, Escourrou J, Branche J, Jilet L, Abdoul H, Kaddour N, Leblanc S, Bensoussan M, Prat F, Chaussade S. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation or surveillance in patients with Barrett's oesophagus with confirmed low-grade dysplasia: a multicentre randomised trial. Gut 2021; 70:1014-1022. [PMID: 33685969 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Due to an annual progression rate of Barrett's oesophagus (BO) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) between 9% and 13% per year endoscopic ablation therapy is preferred to surveillance. Since this recommendation is based on only one randomised trial, we aimed at checking these results by another multicentre randomised trial with a similar design. DESIGN A prospective randomised study was performed in 14 centres comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (maximum of 4 sessions) to annual endoscopic surveillance, including patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BO with LGD. Primary outcome was the prevalence of LGD at 3 years. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of LGD at 1 year, the complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) at 3 years, the rate of neoplastic progression at 3 years and the treatment-related morbidity. RESULTS 125 patients were initially included, of whom 82 with confirmed LGD (76 men, mean age 62.3 years) were finally randomised, 40 patients in the RFA and 42 in the surveillance group. At 3 years, CE-IM rates were 35% vs 0% in the RFA and surveillance groups, respectively (p<0.001). At the same time, the prevalence LGD was 34.3% (95% CI 18.6 to 50.0) in the RFA group vs 58.1% (95% CI 40.7 to 75.4) in the surveillance group (OR=0.38 (95% CI 0.14 to 1.02), p=0.05). Neoplastic progression was found in 12.5% (RFA) vs 26.2% (surveillance; p=0.15). The complication rate was maximal after the first RFA treatment (16.9%). CONCLUSION RFA modestly reduced the prevalence of LGD as well as progression risk at 3 years. The risk-benefit balance of endoscopic ablation therapy should therefore be carefully weighted against surveillance in patients with BO with confirmed LGD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01360541.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilien Barret
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hopital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Benoit Terris
- Pathology, Hopital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Gastroenterology, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Franck Cholet
- Digestive Endoscopy, CHRU de Brest, Brest, Bretagne, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
| | - Edouard Chabrun
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
| | - Marc Le Rhun
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Gastroenterology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Gastroenterology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - René Laugier
- Gastroenterology, Hospital Timone, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Jeremie Jacques
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, Limousin, France
| | - Romain Legros
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, Limousin, France
| | - Christian Boustiere
- Gastroenterology, Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azu, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Metivier-Cesbron
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, Pays de la Loire, France
| | - Geoffroy Vanbiervliet
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
| | - Paul Bauret
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France
| | - Jean Escourrou
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France
| | - Julien Branche
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France
| | - Lea Jilet
- Clinical Research Unit, Hospital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Hendy Abdoul
- Clinical Research Unit, Hospital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Nadira Kaddour
- Clinical Research Unit, Hospital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Sarah Leblanc
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hopital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Michael Bensoussan
- Gastroenterology, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Montérégie-Centre du Québec territoire Champlain-Charles-Le Moyne, Saint-Hubert, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frederic Prat
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hopital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hopital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rengarajan A, Pomarat M, Zerbib F, Gyawali CP. Overlap of functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14056. [PMID: 33300667 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When esophageal acid exposure time (AET) is physiologic, ROME IV stratifies functional esophageal disorders into functional heartburn (FH, with negative reflux-symptom association) and reflux hypersensitivity (RH, with positive reflux-symptom association), and hypothesizes that FH/RH could overlap with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We compared conventional FH/RH diagnosed off antisecretory therapy with overlap FH/RH coexisting with proven GERD. METHODS Adult patients with heartburn underwent pH-impedance testing on therapy (proven GERD) and off therapy (unproven GERD) and completed validated questionnaires defining symptoms (Reflux Diagnostic Questionnaire, RDQ), affective state (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS; Visceral Sensitivity Index, VSI), and functional diagnoses (irritable bowel syndrome, IBS; functional dyspepsia, FD on ROME diagnostic questionnaire). AET (pathologic: >6%, physiologic <4%) and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) were calculated. Clinical, psychological, and functional profiles were compared between FH and RH and to a comparison cohort of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD, AET > 6%). KEY RESULTS Study patients included 19 with RH (10 with overlap RH), 60 with FH (31 with overlap FH), and 26 patients with NERD. Clinical, psychological, and functional profiles of conventional FH/RH were similar to overlap FH/RH. Compared with NERD, combined FH and RH cohorts had higher anxiety scores, and lower proportions with IBS. Compared with FH with low MNBI, FH defined using both normal AET and normal MNBI had higher depression scores (p = 0.008), and trended toward higher anxiety scores (p = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Conventional and overlap FH and RH have similar clinical, psychological and functional profiles, thereby proving ROME IV hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind Rengarajan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Margaux Pomarat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wauters L, Dickman R, Drug V, Mulak A, Serra J, Enck P, Tack J, Accarino A, Barbara G, Bor S, Coffin B, Corsetti M, De Schepper H, Dumitrascu D, Farmer A, Gourcerol G, Hauser G, Hausken T, Karamanolis G, Keszthelyi D, Malagelada C, Milosavljevic T, Muris J, O'Morain C, Papathanasopoulos A, Pohl D, Rumyantseva D, Sarnelli G, Savarino E, Schol J, Sheptulin A, Smet A, Stengel A, Storonova O, Storr M, Törnblom H, Vanuytsel T, Velosa M, Waluga M, Zarate N, Zerbib F. United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on functional dyspepsia. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9:307-331. [PMID: 33939891 PMCID: PMC8259261 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common conditions in clinical practice. In spite of its prevalence, FD is associated with major uncertainties in terms of its definition, underlying pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Methods A Delphi consensus was initiated with 41 experts from 22 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 87 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 36 statements. Results The panel agreed with the definition in terms of its cardinal symptoms (early satiation, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning), its subdivision into epigastric pain syndrome and postprandial distress syndrome, and the presence of accessory symptoms (upper abdominal bloating, nausea, belching), and overlapping conditions. Also, well accepted are the female predominance of FD, its impact on quality of life and health costs, and acute gastrointestinal infections, and anxiety as risk factors. In terms of pathophysiological mechanisms, the consensus supports a role for impaired gastric accommodation, delayed gastric emptying, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, Helicobacter pylori infection, and altered central processing of signals from the gastroduodenal region. There is consensus that endoscopy is mandatory for establishing a firm diagnosis of FD, but that in primary care, patients without alarm symptoms or risk factors can be managed without endoscopy. There is consensus that H. pylori status should be determined in every patient with dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori positive patients should receive eradication therapy. Also, proton pump inhibitor therapy is considered an effective therapy for FD, but no other treatment approach reached a consensus. The long‐term prognosis and life expectancy are favorable. Conclusions and Inferences A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on the definition, diagnosis and management of FD.
Current knowledge
Functional dyspepsia is one of the most common conditions encountered in clinical practice. There is a lack of guidance for clinicians in guiding diagnosis and treatment of this prevalent condition. No treatments are currently approved for the treatment of functional dyspepsia in Europe.
What is new here
A Delphi panel consisting of 41 experts from 22 European countries established the level of consensus on 87 statements regarding functional dyspepsia. The statements reaching consensus serve to guide clinicians in recognizing, diagnosing and treating FD in clinical practice. Endoscopy is mandatory for establishing a firm diagnosis of functional dyspepsia D, but in primary care patients without alarm symptoms or risk factors can be managed without endoscopy. Helicobacter pylori status should be determined in every patient with dyspeptic symptoms and H. Pylori positive patients should receive eradication therapy. Proton pump inhibitor‐therapy is considered an effective therapy for FD, but no other treatment approach reached consensus support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Wauters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ram Dickman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikwa, Israel
| | - Vasile Drug
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Gr T Popa Iasi and University Hospital St Spiridon, Iasi, Romania
| | - Agata Mulak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jordi Serra
- University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Badalona, Spain
| | - Paul Enck
- Department of Internal Medicine VI: Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jan Tack
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Anna Accarino
- CIBERehd and Departament de Medicina, Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giovanni Barbara
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Serhat Bor
- Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Université de Paris and AP-HP Hôpital Louis Mourier, Paris, France
| | - Maura Corsetti
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heiko De Schepper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dan Dumitrascu
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Adam Farmer
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Goran Hauser
- Medical Faculty Rijeka, University of Rijeka and Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Trygve Hausken
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - George Karamanolis
- Gastroentrology Unit, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Daniel Keszthelyi
- Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carolin Malagelada
- CIBERehd and Departament de Medicina, Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jean Muris
- Department of General Practice, Caphri Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Colm O'Morain
- Department of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin and National Clinical Lead for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal College Physicians Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Daniel Pohl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Diana Rumyantseva
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Giovanni Sarnelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Departmento of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Jolien Schol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arkady Sheptulin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Annemieke Smet
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and InflA-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, and Charité Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Tübingen, Germany.,Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Center of Endoscopy, Starnberg, Germany.,Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Olga Storonova
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Martin Storr
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans Törnblom
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Tim Vanuytsel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Marek Waluga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Natalia Zarate
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque and Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zerbib F, Bredenoord AJ, Fass R, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Vaezi M, Yadlapati R, Gyawali CP. ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14075. [PMID: 33368919 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Up to 40% of patients with symptoms suspicious of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not respond completely to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The term "refractory GERD" has been used loosely in the literature. A distinction should be made between refractory symptoms (ie, symptoms may or may not be GERD-related), refractory GERD symptoms (ie, persisting symptoms in patients with proven GERD, regardless of relationship to ongoing reflux), and refractory GERD (ie, objective evidence of GERD despite adequate medical management). The present ESNM/ANMS consensus paper proposes use the term "refractory GERD symptoms" only in patients with persisting symptoms and previously proven GERD by either endoscopy or esophageal pH monitoring. Even in this context, symptoms may or may not be reflux related. Objective evaluation, including endoscopy and esophageal physiologic testing, is requisite to provide insights into mechanisms of symptom generation and evidence of true refractory GERD. Some patients may have true ongoing refractory acid or weakly acidic reflux despite PPIs, while others have no evidence of ongoing reflux, and yet others have functional esophageal disorders (overlapping with proven GERD confirmed off therapy). In this context, attention should also be paid to supragastric belching and rumination syndrome, which may be important contributors to refractory symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Ronnie Fass
- Digestive Health Center, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter J Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E Herriot, Digestive Physiology, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michael Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zerbib F, Luna D, Marin I, Serra J. The added value of symptom analysis during a rapid drink challenge in high-resolution esophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14008. [PMID: 33043538 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with esophageal symptoms often remain with an uncertain diagnosis after high-resolution manometry. AIM To determine the added value of concomitant pressure and symptom analysis in response to a rapid drink challenge (RDC). METHODS In consecutive patients referred for esophageal manometry, a RDC consisting in free drinking of 200 ml of water as quick as possible was performed after the standard single water swallows manometry. Both pressure patterns and usual symptoms induced by the RDC were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 1319 patients were included, (64.7% women, mean age 58.2 years, range 11-90). There were significant differences in pressure responses between patients with obstructive disorders, major hypercontractile disorders, esophageal hypomotility disorders and normal motility. The RDC provoked usual symptoms in 388 (29.4%) patients, associated with hyperpressive and obstructive patterns in 14.0% and 16.6%, respectively. Reproduction of dysphagia and regurgitation (not pain) was significantly associated with abnormal pressure responses during the RDC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). The RDC elicited both abnormal pressure patterns and symptoms in 6.2%, 1.6%, and 20.8% of patients with normal motility, ineffective esophageal motility, and esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction, respectively. CONCLUSION Concomitant evaluation of symptoms and pressure responses to a RDC may increase the specificity of esophageal motor testing in patients with inconclusive diagnosis or normal esophageal motility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.,Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Daniel Luna
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ingrid Marin
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Jordi Serra
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sabate JM, Deutsch D, Melchior C, Entremont A, Mion F, Bouchoucha M, Façon S, Raynaud JJ, Zerbib F, Jouët P. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown stress consequences in people with and without Irritable Bowel Syndrome. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 18:100660. [PMID: 34150971 PMCID: PMC8206631 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background While all resources have been mobilized to fight COVID-19, this study aimed to analyze the consequences of lockdown and pandemic stress in participants with and without Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Methodology An online survey was proposed to people with or without IBS during the exponential phase of the pandemic in France. The questionnaire included questions about socio-demographic data, conditions of confinement, activities carried out, IBS characteristics, measurement of stress level, consequences on sleep, fatigue, anxiety and depression, and quality of life (both perceived non-specific and specific for IBS). Results/Discussion From March 31 to April 15, 2020, 304 participants, 232 with IBS and 72 without were included in the survey (mean age: 46.8 ± 16.8 years, female gender: 75.3%). Age, level of education, financial resources, living space per person and activities performed during confinement were identical in both groups. Stress linked to fear of COVID-19, lockdown and financial worries was at the same level in both groups, but the psychological consequences and deterioration of quality of life (QOL) were both higher in IBS participants. In a univariate analysis, teleworking, solitary confinement, and low household resources had a variable impact on the scores of depression, anxiety, fatigue and non-specific perceived QOL, but in a multivariate analysis, the only factor explaining a deterioration of non-specific QOL was the fact of suffering from IBS. Conclusion/Perspectives Stress linked to the COVID-19 pandemic and confinement is high and equivalent in both IBS and non-IBS participants, with higher psychological and QOL consequences in IBS patients who have altered coping capacities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-M Sabate
- Gastroenterology Department, hôpital Avicenne, Paris 13 Nord, AP-HP, 125, rue de Stalingrad, Bobigny, France.,INSERM U-987, Pathophysiology and Clinical Pharmacology of pain, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - D Deutsch
- Gastroenterology Department, hôpital Avicenne, Paris 13 Nord, AP-HP, 125, rue de Stalingrad, Bobigny, France
| | - C Melchior
- Gastroenterology Department and INSERM CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM UMR 1073, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Normandy University, 76031 Rouen, France
| | - A Entremont
- 28, place du marché Saint-Honoré, 75001 Paris, France
| | - F Mion
- Gastroenterology Department, hôpital Edouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69437 Lyon, France
| | - M Bouchoucha
- Gastroenterology Department, hôpital Avicenne, Paris 13 Nord, AP-HP, 125, rue de Stalingrad, Bobigny, France
| | - S Façon
- Association des patients souffrant du syndrome de l'intestin irritable (APSSII, www.apsssi.org), hôpital Avicenne, 125, rue de Stalingrad, Bobigny, France
| | - J-J Raynaud
- Gastroenterology Department, hôpital Avicenne, Paris 13 Nord, AP-HP, 125, rue de Stalingrad, Bobigny, France
| | - F Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, 1, avenue Magellan, 33604 Pessac cedex, France
| | - P Jouët
- INSERM U-987, Pathophysiology and Clinical Pharmacology of pain, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,Gastroenterology Department, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Christensen P, IM Baeten C, Espín‐Basany E, Martellucci J, Nugent KP, Zerbib F, Pellino G, Rosen H. Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:461-475. [PMID: 33411977 PMCID: PMC7986060 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Little is known about the pathophysiology of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), and evidence concerning the management of patients diagnosed with this condition is scarce. The aim of the LARS Expert Advisory Panel was to develop practical guidance for healthcare professionals dealing with LARS. METHOD The 'Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome' (MANUEL) project was promoted by a team of eight experts in the assessment and management of patients with LARS. After a face-to-face meeting, a strategy was agreed to create a comprehensive, practical guide covering all aspects that were felt to be clinically relevant. Eight themes were decided upon and working groups established. Each working group generated a draft; these were collated by another collaborator into a manuscript, after a conference call. This was circulated among the collaborators, and it was revised following the comments received. A lay patient revised the manuscript, and contributed to a section containing a patient's perspective. The manuscript was again circulated and finalized. A final teleconference was held at the end of the project. RESULTS The guidance covers all aspects of LARS management, from pathophysiology, to assessment and management. Given the lack of sound evidence and the often poor quality of the studies, most of the recommendations and conclusions are based on the opinions of the experts. CONCLUSIONS The MANUEL project provides an up-to-date practical summary of the available evidence concerning LARS, with useful directions for healthcare professional and patients suffering from this debilitating condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Christensen
- Department of SurgeryDanish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic OrgansAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Coen IM Baeten
- Department of SurgeryGroene Hart ZiekenhuisGoudaThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology DepartmentCHU de BordeauxCentre Medico‐Chirurgical MagellanHôpital Haut‐LévêqueUniversité de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Colorectal SurgeryVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain,Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversitá degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’NaplesItaly
| | - Harald Rosen
- Department of Surgical OncologySigmund Freud UniversityViennaAustria
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Babaei A, Mittal RK, Rommel N, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Smout A, Vaezi MF, Zerbib F, Akiyama J, Bhatia S, Bor S, Carlson DA, Chen JW, Cisternas D, Cock C, Coss-Adame E, de Bortoli N, Defilippi C, Fass R, Ghoshal UC, Gonlachanvit S, Hani A, Hebbard GS, Jung KW, Katz P, Katzka DA, Khan A, Kohn GP, Lazarescu A, Lengliner J, Mittal SK, Omari T, In Park M, Penagini R, Pohl D, Richter JE, Serra J, Sweis R, Tack J, Tatum RP, Tutuian R, Vela MF, Wong RK, Wu JC, Xiao Y, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0 ©. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14058. [PMID: 33373111 PMCID: PMC8034247 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 359] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty-two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two-years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ metrics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for patterns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena Yadlapati
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Peter J. Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark R. Fox
- University of Zürich, CH-8091 Zürich & Department of Gastroenterology, Klinik Arlesheim, CH-4144 Arlesheim
| | - Albert J. Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C. Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Univ Lyon, Université Lyon I, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, F-69003, Lyon, France,Univ Lyon, Université Lyon I, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM, LabTAU, F-69003, Lyon, France
| | | | - Ravinder K. Mittal
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- University of Leuven, Neurosciences, Experimental ORL, Deglutology - University Hospitals Leuven Dept Gastroenterology, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Wingate institute of Neurogastroenterology, Queen Mary University of London
| | - André Smout
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401; Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Serhat Bor
- Ege University School of Medicine, Div. Gastroenterology, Turkey
| | - Dustin A. Carlson
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Daniel Cisternas
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo. Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Enrique Coss-Adame
- Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa
| | | | - Ronnie Fass
- MetroHealth System and case Western Reserve University
| | - Uday C. Ghoshal
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Sutep Gonlachanvit
- Excellence Center on Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
| | - Albis Hani
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Hospital San Ignacio, Colombia
| | | | - Kee Wook Jung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | - Abraham Khan
- New York University, Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Taher Omari
- College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - Moo In Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Pohl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joel E. Richter
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jordi Serra
- University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol. Badalona. CIBERehd
| | - Rami Sweis
- University College London Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Tack
- TARGID, University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roger P. Tatum
- University of Washington Department of Surgery/VA Puget Sound HCS
| | - Radu Tutuian
- Bürgerspital Solothurn, University of Bern, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Reuben K. Wong
- Yong Loo Lin of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin C. Wu
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
| | - John E. Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Montes G, Duval F, Eldani C, Amico S, Gerard E, Dutriaux C, Herran C, Poullenot F, Sole G, Guerin C, Zerbib F, Celerier P, Prey S. Vomissements incoercibles révélant une achalasie de l’œsophage avec AC anti-GAD65+ : une complication neurologique dysautonomique méconnue de l’association ipilimumab+nivolumab. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2020.09.477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
38
|
Philonenko S, Roman S, Zerbib F, Gourcerol G, Gault N, Ropert A, Bruley des Varannes S, Barret M, Vitton V, Bouchoucha M, Billard N, Gorbatchef C, Duboc H, Coffin B. Jackhammer esophagus: Clinical presentation, manometric diagnosis, and therapeutic results-Results from a multicenter French cohort. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13918. [PMID: 32510747 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a hypercontractile esophageal motor disorder defined by at least two swallows with a distal contractile integral (DCI) >8000 mm Hg.s.cm during high-resolution manometry (HRM). The relationship between symptoms and hypercontractility and the response to therapies have been poorly evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical presentation, manometric diagnosis, and therapeutic results in a large cohort of JE patients. METHODS Patients with JE diagnosed among the HRM tests performed in nine academic French centers from 01/01/2010 to 08/31/2016 were included. Patient charts were reviewed to collect clinical and therapeutic data. RESULTS Among the 16 264 HRM tests performed during this period, 227 patients (60.8 ± 13.8 years, 151 male) had JE (1.7%). Dysphagia was the most frequent symptom (74.6%), followed by regurgitation (37.1%) and chest pain (36.6%); 4.7% of the patients were asymptomatic. The diagnostic workup was heterogeneous, and only a minority of patients had esophageal biopsies. None of the individual symptoms were significantly associated with any of the manometric parameters defined, except for dysphagia, which was significantly associated with the mean of all DCIs >8000 mm Hg.s.cm (P = .04). Additionally, the number of symptoms was not associated with any manometric parameter. Medical treatment and endoscopic treatments had poor efficacy and a high relapse rate. CONCLUSION Jackhammer esophagus is a rare motility disorder. Diagnostic workup is heterogeneous and should be standardized. Symptoms are poorly associated with manometric parameters. The medical treatments and endoscopic therapies currently used are inefficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Philonenko
- Gastroenterology Unit, AP-HP Hôpital Louis Mourier, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon I University, Lyon, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Nathalie Gault
- Epidemiology, Biostatistic and Clinical Research Department, INSERM CIC-EC 1425, AP-HP Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
| | - Alain Ropert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Nicolas Billard
- Epidemiology, Biostatistic and Clinical Research Department, INSERM CIC-EC 1425, AP-HP Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Gorbatchef
- Gastroenterology Unit, AP-HP Hôpital Louis Mourier, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Henri Duboc
- Gastroenterology Unit, AP-HP Hôpital Louis Mourier, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Gastroenterology Unit, AP-HP Hôpital Louis Mourier, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sifrim D, Roman S, Savarino E, Bor S, Bredenoord AJ, Castell D, Cicala M, de Bortoli N, Frazzoni M, Gonlachanvit S, Iwakiri K, Kawamura O, Krarup A, Lee YY, Soon Ngiu C, Ndebia E, Patcharatraku T, Pauwels A, Pérez de la Serna J, Ramos R, Remes-Troche JM, Ribolsi M, Sammon A, Simren M, Tack J, Tutuian R, Valdovinos M, Xiao Y, Zerbib F, Gyawali CP. Normal values and regional differences in oesophageal impedance-pH metrics: a consensus analysis of impedance-pH studies from around the world. Gut 2020; 70:gutjnl-2020-322627. [PMID: 33037054 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limitations of existing impedance-pH thresholds include small sample size of normative studies, inclusion of artefactual pH drops and incorrect identification of impedance reflux events. We aimed to obtain new impedance-pH thresholds from expert consensus analysis of tracings from a large number of healthy subjects. DESIGN Of 541 studies performed worldwide using two different systems (Diversatek, USA, and Laborie, Netherlands), 150 tracings with oesophageal diagnoses, behavioural disorders and study-related artefacts were excluded. The remainder studies were subject to two reviewer consensus analysis, in-person or through video conference, consisting of editing meals and pH drops, identification of impedance reflux and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) using strict pre-established criteria and measurement of distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI). RESULTS Consensus analysis was performed in 391 tracings (age 32.7 years, range 18-71, 54.2% female). Normative thresholds were significantly different between Diversatek and Laborie (total acid exposure time: 2.8% and 5%; reflux episodes: 55 and 78; MNBI at 3 cm: 1400 and 1500 ohms, at 5 cm: 1400 and 1800 ohms). Males had higher acid exposure, more reflux episodes and lower MNBI. Significant regional differences were identified, including higher PSPW scores in Western countries, and higher MNBI in Asia using Diversatek, and higher acid exposure in the Netherlands, higher MNBI in Asia and South Africa, and lower MNBI in Turkey using Laborie. CONCLUSION Normal impedance-pH monitoring thresholds have regional and system-related differences. Clinical interpretation needs to use normal thresholds valid for the system used and world region, following careful editing of the tracings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sifrim
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Serhat Bor
- Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald Castell
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Michele Cicala
- Digestive Disease, Universita Campus Bio Medico, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Sutep Gonlachanvit
- Department of Medicine, Chlalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Katsuhiko Iwakiri
- Department of Gaastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Anne Krarup
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Department of Neurogastroenterology Research, The North Danish Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
- St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chai Soon Ngiu
- Cardiac Vascular Sentral Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Eugene Ndebia
- Division of Medical Physiology, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
| | - Tanisa Patcharatraku
- Gastropenterology, Center of Excellence in Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ans Pauwels
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julio Pérez de la Serna
- Immunology and Gastroenterology Departments, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Ramos
- Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Mentore Ribolsi
- Digestive Disease, Universita Campus Bio Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Alastair Sammon
- Division of Medical Physiology, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
| | - Magnus Simren
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Tack
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Radu Tutuian
- University Clinics for Visceral Surgery and Medcine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Miguel Valdovinos
- Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zerbib F, Rommel N, Pandolfino J, Gyawali CP. ESNM/ANMS Review. Diagnosis and management of globus sensation: A clinical challenge. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13850. [PMID: 32329203 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Globus is a non-painful sensation of a tightness or a lump/foreign body in the throat that is not associated with dysphagia and may actually improve during meals. While several otorhinolaryngologic, thyroid, and esophageal disorders have been linked to globus, cause-and-effect relationships are difficult to establish. Consequently, though part of the evaluation, objective otorhinolaryngologic and esophageal testing is often negative. The presence of alarm symptoms, particularly pain, weight loss, dysphagia, or odynophagia is indications for objective testing. A diagnosis of idiopathic globus requires exclusion of pharyngeal, laryngeal, and esophageal disorders with laryngoscopy, endoscopy, high-resolution manometry, barium radiography, and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring. A trial of acid-suppressive therapy may be reasonable in the absence of alarm symptoms, especially if concurrent reflux symptoms are identified. Ablation of heterotopic gastric mucosa in the proximal esophagus has been reported to improve globus symptoms. Beyond these specific approaches, further management of idiopathic globus consists of reassurance, neuromodulators, and complementary approaches. Globus has a benign course with no long-term consequences, and the overall prognosis is good as the magnitude of symptoms may decline over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Neurogastroenterology & Motility, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zerbib F, Marin I, Cisternas D, Abrahao L, Hani A, Leguizamo AM, Remes-Troche JM, Perez de la Serna J, Ruiz de Leon A, Serra J. Ineffective esophageal motility and bolus clearance. A study with combined high-resolution manometry and impedance in asymptomatic controls and patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13876. [PMID: 32394518 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The definition and relevance of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) remains debated. Our aim was to determine motility patterns and symptoms associated with IEM defined as impaired bolus clearance. METHODS To define altered bolus clearance, normal range of swallows with complete bolus transit (CBT) on high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) was determined in 44 asymptomatic controls. The results were then applied to a cohort of 81 patients with esophageal symptoms to determine the motility patterns which best predicted altered bolus clearance. Subsequently, in a cohort of 281 consecutive patients the identified motility patterns were compared with patients' customary symptoms. KEY RESULTS In asymptomatic controls, the normal range of swallows with CBT was 50%-100%. In patients, altered bolus transit (<50% CBT) was only associated with 30% or more failed contractions (P < .001). Neither weak peristalsis nor absence of contraction reserve (CR) was associated with altered bolus clearance. The patterns which best predicted altered bolus clearance were failed contractions ≥30% (specificity 88.2% and sensitivity of 84.6%), and ≥70% ineffective (failed + weak) contractions (sensitivity 84.6% and specificity 80.9%). No motility pattern was correlated to symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Based on bolus clearance assessed by HRIM, ≥30% failed contractions and ≥70% ineffective contractions have the best sensitivity and specificity to predict altered bolus clearance. Weak contractions and absence of CR are not relevant with respect to bolus clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Department of Medicine, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.,Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ingrid Marin
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Department of Medicine, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Luiz Abrahao
- University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Albis Hani
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Laboratorio de Motilidad, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ana M Leguizamo
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Laboratorio de Motilidad, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - José M Remes-Troche
- Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, México
| | | | | | - Jordi Serra
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Department of Medicine, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zerbib F, Sacher-Huvelin S, Coron E, Coffin B, Melchior C, Ponchon T, Cholet F, Chabrun E, Vavasseur F, Gorbatchef C, Zalar A, Mion F, Robaszkiewicz M, Le Rhun M, Leroy M, Paul Galmiche J, Bruley des Varannes S. Randomised clinical trial: oesophageal radiofrequency energy delivery versus sham for PPI-refractory heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:637-645. [PMID: 32656869 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal radiofrequency reduces use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease responding to PPIs. AIM To determine the efficacy of oesophageal radiofrequency in patients with PPI-refractory heartburn. METHODS A randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled multicentre study was designed to assess the efficacy of oesophageal radiofrequency in PPI non-responding patients with heartburn. Patients had moderate-to-severe heartburn defined by at least 3 occurrences a week, and not improved by continuous PPI treatment. The primary endpoint was clinical success at week 24, defined by intake of less than 7 PPI doses over the 2 preceding weeks and adequate symptom control determined by the patient. RESULTS Sixty two patients were randomised, 29 to the oesophageal radiofrequency group and 33 to the sham group. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 1/29 (3.4%) and 5/33 (15.1%) achieved the primary endpoint in the oesophageal radiofrequency and sham groups, respectively (NS). There was no significant difference between oesophageal radiofrequency and sham regarding the number of days without heartburn, days with PPI consumption in the last 2 weeks, and patients not taking PPIs. No pH-impedance parameter was associated with clinical response. The occurrence of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION This sham-controlled, randomised study did not demonstrate any efficacy of oesophageal radiofrequency for the treatment of PPI-refractory heartburn regarding symptom relief or consumption of PPIs. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01682265.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sylvie Sacher-Huvelin
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), CIC1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), CIC1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Chloé Melchior
- Gastroenterology Department, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM CIC-CRB 1404 and INSERM U1073, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Normandy University, Rouen, France
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Franck Cholet
- Gastroenterology Department, CHRU de Brest, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Université de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Edouard Chabrun
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Fabienne Vavasseur
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), CIC1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Caroline Gorbatchef
- Gastroenterology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Zalar
- Gastroenterology Department, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM CIC-CRB 1404 and INSERM U1073, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Normandy University, Rouen, France
| | - François Mion
- Digestive Physiology Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1082 LabTau, Lyon, France
| | - Michel Robaszkiewicz
- Gastroenterology Department, CHRU de Brest, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Université de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Marc Le Rhun
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), CIC1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Maxime Leroy
- Methodology and Biostatistics Department, CHU de Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jean Paul Galmiche
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), CIC1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Stanislas Bruley des Varannes
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), CIC1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rivière P, Zerbib F. Les colites microscopiques. Rev Med Interne 2020; 41:523-528. [PMID: 32674898 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Microscopic colitis is frequently found as a cause of chronic watery diarrhea in women after menopause. The disease can be associated with a medication side effect in half of the patients (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or proton pump inhibitors for instance). Colonic biopsies are mandatory for the diagnosis of microscopic colitis and should be performed in several locations of the colon. Management of microscopic colitis is first based on avoiding iatrogenic factors and smoking together with symptomatic treatment of diarrhea (loperamide, cholestyramine). In case of failure or severe symptoms, budesonide is the key treatment. The aim of the treatment is to achieve clinical remission, defined as less than 3 liquid stools per day, to improve quality of life. After a first course of budesonide, recurrence of diarrhea is frequent and a maintenance therapy can be prescribed for several months. In case of intolerance or refractoriness, second-line therapy (immunosuppressants, biological therapy, surgery) should be discussed in multidisciplinary team meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Rivière
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et Oncologie digestive, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, CHU de Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France.
| | - F Zerbib
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et Oncologie digestive, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, CHU de Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fass R, Zerbib F, Gyawali CP. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Functional Heartburn: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:2286-2293. [PMID: 32017911 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: A diagnosis of functional heartburn should be considered when retrosternal burning pain or discomfort persists despite maximal (double-dose) proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy taken appropriately before meals during a 3-month period. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: A diagnosis of functional heartburn requires upper endoscopy with esophageal biopsies to rule out anatomic and mucosal abnormalities, esophageal high-resolution manometry to rule out major motor disorders, and pH monitoring off PPI therapy (or pH-impedance monitoring on therapy in patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]), to document physiologic levels of esophageal acid exposure in the distal esophagus with absence of reflux-symptom association (ie, negative symptom index and symptom association probability). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Overlap of functional heartburn with proven GERD is diagnosed according to Rome IV criteria when heartburn persists despite maximal PPI therapy in patients with history of proven GERD (ie, positive pH study, erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, or esophageal ulcer), and pH impedance testing on PPI therapy demonstrates physiologic acid exposure without reflux-symptom association (ie, negative symptom index and symptom association probability). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: PPIs have no therapeutic value in functional heartburn, the exception being proven GERD that overlaps with functional heartburn. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Neuromodulators, including tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tegaserod, and histamine-2 receptor antagonists have benefit as either primary therapy in functional heartburn or as add-on therapy in functional heartburn that overlaps with proven GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Based on available evidence, acupuncture and hypnotherapy may have benefit as monotherapy in functional heartburn, or as adjunctive therapy combined with other therapeutic modalities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Based on available evidence, anti-reflux surgery and endoscopic GERD treatment modalities have no therapeutic benefit in functional heartburn and should not be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie Fass
- Digestive Health Center, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Foisy H, Pioche M, Chabrun E, Ponchon T, Zerbib F, Rivory J, Mion F, Roman S. Role of Rapid Drink Challenge During Esophageal High-resolution Manometry in Predicting Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 26:204-214. [PMID: 32027787 PMCID: PMC7176508 DOI: 10.5056/jnm19135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Peroral endoscopy myotomy (POEM) is effective to treat achalasia. We aim to determine POEM effect on esophageal function and search for predictive factors of response to POEM and co-occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods A total of 64 untreated achalasia patients who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) before and 3 months after POEM were retrospectively included. Response to treatment was defined as an Eckardt score < 3. Reflux symptoms and patient's satisfaction were evaluated. Data were compared using paired t test, Chi-square test or log rank test. Results The 2-year success rate in response to POEM was 90%. All responders reported being satisfied while only 33% of non-responders did (P < 0.001) and 64% of patients with reflux symptoms were satisfied versus 96% of those without (P = 0.009). On HRM, the integrated relaxation pressure and the contractile pattern changed significantly after POEM but were not predictive of response. Between pre and post POEM HRM, a decrease in maximal esophageal pressurization during rapid drink challenge (RDC) was associated with a better response rate than an increase of pressurization (91% vs 50%, P = 0.004). As evidenced by pH monitoring performed after POEM, GERD was pathological or borderline in 50% of patients (18/36) while only 19% (11/59) reported clinically significant reflux symptoms. On post POEM HRM, maximal esophageal pressurization during RDC was lower in patients with pathological or borderline GERD compared to those without (P = 0.054). Conclusions Esophageal HRM parameters changed significantly after POEM. Maximal esophageal pressurization during RDC may be useful to predict outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Foisy
- Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Gastroenterology, Hopital E Herriot, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Lyon I University, Digestive Physiology, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Gastroenterology, Hopital E Herriot, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Inserm U1032, Labtau, Lyon, France
| | - Edouard Chabrun
- Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Gastroenterology, Hôpital Haut Leveque, Pessac, France
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Gastroenterology, Hopital E Herriot, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Inserm U1032, Labtau, Lyon, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Gastroenterology, Hôpital Haut Leveque, Pessac, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Gastroenterology, Hopital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - François Mion
- Université de Lyon, Lyon I University, Digestive Physiology, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Inserm U1032, Labtau, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, Hôpital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Sabine Roman
- Université de Lyon, Lyon I University, Digestive Physiology, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Inserm U1032, Labtau, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, Hôpital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Poullenot F, Ollivier J, Rivière P, Sauvaget L, Berroneau A, Djabarouti S, Xuereb F, Zerbib F, Breilh D, Laharie D. Implementation of infliximab standardized doses after pharmacokinetic modelization in a cohort of patients with Crohn's disease. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:408-413. [PMID: 31874834 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to infliximab (IFX) license in Crohn's disease (CD), infusion doses are based on patient's body-weight. Dose banding providing standardized doses (SD) has been implemented in parenteral chemotherapy in order to optimize aseptic unit capacity and reduce drug expenditure, duration of hospital stay and costs without decreasing efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHOD The first part was a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive CD patients receiving IFX maintenance therapy to determine standardized doses covering more than 50% of infusions. The second part was a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of SD compared to body-weight doses (BWD) on admission duration and costs. RESULTS Six IFX SD covering more than 90% of infusion doses were implemented for dose banding. According to the Monte-Carlo simulation, there was no significant difference between IFX SD and BWD maintenance regimens. When assessed prospectively in 116 patients (75 patients treated with SD and 41 with BWD) corresponding to 128 infusions, hospitalization duration was shortened by 70 min per patient (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION According to a pharmacokinetic model, IFX SD has a pharmacokinetic profile close to BWD and is associated with reduced length of hospitalization in a cohort of patients with CD. IFX SD implementation could optimize infusion units functioning and, save time and costs without decreasing efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Poullenot
- CHU De Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, CMC Magellan, Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
| | - Julien Ollivier
- Pharmacie, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Haut-Lévêque, CHU De Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Pauline Rivière
- CHU De Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, CMC Magellan, Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Lucie Sauvaget
- Pharmacie, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Haut-Lévêque, CHU De Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Aude Berroneau
- Pharmacie, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Haut-Lévêque, CHU De Bordeaux, Pessac, France; Laboratoire De Pharmacocinétique Et De Pharmacie Clinique, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux Cedex, France; INSERM U1034 Cardiovascular Adaptation to Ischemia, Pessac, France
| | - Sarah Djabarouti
- Pharmacie, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Haut-Lévêque, CHU De Bordeaux, Pessac, France; Laboratoire De Pharmacocinétique Et De Pharmacie Clinique, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux Cedex, France; INSERM U1034 Cardiovascular Adaptation to Ischemia, Pessac, France
| | - Fabien Xuereb
- Pharmacie, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Haut-Lévêque, CHU De Bordeaux, Pessac, France; Laboratoire De Pharmacocinétique Et De Pharmacie Clinique, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux Cedex, France; INSERM U1034 Cardiovascular Adaptation to Ischemia, Pessac, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU De Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, CMC Magellan, Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Dominique Breilh
- Pharmacie, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Haut-Lévêque, CHU De Bordeaux, Pessac, France; Laboratoire De Pharmacocinétique Et De Pharmacie Clinique, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux Cedex, France; INSERM U1034 Cardiovascular Adaptation to Ischemia, Pessac, France
| | - David Laharie
- CHU De Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, CMC Magellan, Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Guiard E, Lelievre B, Rouyer M, Zerbib F, Diquet B, Mégraud F, Tison F, Bignon E, Lassalle R, Droz-Perroteau C, Moore N, Blin P. Bismuth Concentrations in Patients Treated in Real-Life Practice with a Bismuth Subcitrate-Metronidazole-Tetracycline Preparation: The SAPHARY Study. Drug Saf 2020; 42:993-1003. [PMID: 31069703 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00821-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A fixed-dose association of bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline (BMT) (Pylera®, Allergan, NJ, USA) was made available in France in 2013 for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Due to a historical issue of bismuth encephalopathy, the French Health Authorities requested a study of blood and plasma bismuth concentrations with BMT in daily practice. AIMS The aim of the study was to measure eventual bismuth accumulation and neurological toxicity in patients prescribed BMT. METHODS Patients initiating BMT for H. pylori between March 2014 and December 2015 were included. A blood sample was taken before first BMT intake and 24 h after the last intake, for assay of bismuth. A concentration > 50 μg/L was considered abnormal. Neurological complaints were assessed at inclusion, at the end of the 10-day treatment course, and 28 days later. RESULTS 202 patients were included, of whom 190 took at least one dose of BMT, and 167 provided both required blood samples. Mean blood bismuth concentrations after the BMT course were 16.9 μg/L (95% confidence interval 15.6-18.3). Concentrations were > 50 μg/L (56.0 μg/L and 50.9 μg/L) in two elderly patients, one of whom presented mild, transient memory impairment during treatment. Non-serious neurological symptoms occurred in 20% of all patients and treatment failure was documented in 5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS In this study measuring blood bismuth concentrations in real-life practice, in < 1% of patients the BMT course resulted in blood bismuth concentrations > 50 μg/L. No serious neurological adverse events were observed. STUDY REGISTRATION EU-PAS register EUPAS3142 at www.encepp.eu ; ENCePP study seal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estelle Guiard
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, University of Bordeaux, Bâtiment Le Tondu, Case 41, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.,INSERM CIC1401, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Magali Rouyer
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, University of Bordeaux, Bâtiment Le Tondu, Case 41, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.,INSERM CIC1401, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bertrand Diquet
- Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU Angers, Angers, France
| | - Francis Mégraud
- Laboratory of Bacteriology, CHU Bordeaux, French National Reference Center for Helicobacters, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM U1053, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - François Tison
- Department of Neurology, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuelle Bignon
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, University of Bordeaux, Bâtiment Le Tondu, Case 41, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.,INSERM CIC1401, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Régis Lassalle
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, University of Bordeaux, Bâtiment Le Tondu, Case 41, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.,INSERM CIC1401, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cécile Droz-Perroteau
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, University of Bordeaux, Bâtiment Le Tondu, Case 41, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.,INSERM CIC1401, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicholas Moore
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, University of Bordeaux, Bâtiment Le Tondu, Case 41, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.,INSERM CIC1401, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM U1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Patrick Blin
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, University of Bordeaux, Bâtiment Le Tondu, Case 41, 146, rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France. .,INSERM CIC1401, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ducrotte P, Coffin B, Bonaz B, Fontaine S, Bruley Des Varannes S, Zerbib F, Caiazzo R, Grimaud JC, Mion F, Hadjadj S, Valensi PE, Vuitton L, Charpentier G, Ropert A, Altwegg R, Pouderoux P, Dorval E, Dapoigny M, Duboc H, Benhamou PY, Schmidt A, Donnadieu N, Gourcerol G, Guerci B. Gastric Electrical Stimulation Reduces Refractory Vomiting in a Randomized Crossover Trial. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:506-514.e2. [PMID: 31647902 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There have been conflicting results from trials of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for treatment of refractory vomiting, associated or not with gastroparesis. We performed a large, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial with crossover to study the efficacy of GES in patients with refractory vomiting, with or without gastroparesis. METHODS For 4 months, we assessed symptoms in 172 patients (66% women; mean age ± standard deviation, 45 ± 12 years; 133 with gastroparesis) with chronic (>12 months) of refractory vomiting (idiopathic, associated with a type 1 or 2 diabetes, or postsurgical). A GES device was implanted and left unactivated until patients were randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to groups that received 4 months of stimulation parameters (14 Hz, 5 mA, pulses of 330 μs) or no stimulation (control); 149 patients then crossed over to the other group for 4 months. Patients were examined at the end of each 4-month period (at 5 and 9 months after implantation). Primary endpoints were vomiting score, ranging from 0 (daily vomiting) to 4 (no vomiting), and the quality of life, assessed by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scoring system. Secondary endpoints were changes in other digestive symptoms, nutritional status, gastric emptying, and control of diabetes. RESULTS During both phases of the crossover study, vomiting scores were higher in the group with the device on (median score, 2) than the control group (median score, 1; P < .001), in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Vomiting scores increased significantly when the device was ON in patients with delayed (P < .01) or normal gastric emptying (P = .05). Gastric emptying was not accelerated during the ON period compared with the OFF period. Having the GES turned on was not associated with increased quality of life. CONCLUSIONS In a randomized crossover study, we found that GES reduced the frequency of refractory vomiting in patients with and without diabetes, although it did not accelerate gastric emptying or increase of quality of life. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number: NCT00903799.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Ducrotte
- Rouen University Hospital-Inserm UMR 1073/Inserm CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen, France
| | | | - Bruno Bonaz
- Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Romain Altwegg
- Montpellier University Hospital-Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Michel Dapoigny
- Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Henri Duboc
- Paris-HP Louis Mourier Hospital, Colombes, France
| | | | | | - Nathalie Donnadieu
- Rouen University Hospital-Inserm UMR 1073/Inserm CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen, France
| | - Guillaume Gourcerol
- Rouen University Hospital-Inserm UMR 1073/Inserm CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bernardot L, Roman S, Barret M, Vitton V, Wallenhorst T, Pioche M, Chaussade S, Gonzalez JM, Ponchon T, Prat F, Barthet M, Vergniol J, Chabrun E, Zerbib F. Efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of non-achalasia esophageal motor disorders. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:5508-5515. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07348-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
50
|
Pauwels A, Boecxstaens V, Andrews CN, Attwood SE, Berrisford R, Bisschops R, Boeckxstaens GE, Bor S, Bredenoord AJ, Cicala M, Corsetti M, Fornari F, Gyawali CP, Hatlebakk J, Johnson SB, Lerut T, Lundell L, Mattioli S, Miwa H, Nafteux P, Omari T, Pandolfino J, Penagini R, Rice TW, Roelandt P, Rommel N, Savarino V, Sifrim D, Suzuki H, Tutuian R, Vanuytsel T, Vela MF, Watson DI, Zerbib F, Tack J. How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery). Gut 2019; 68:1928-1941. [PMID: 31375601 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Antireflux surgery can be proposed in patients with GORD, especially when proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use leads to incomplete symptom improvement. However, to date, international consensus guidelines on the clinical criteria and additional technical examinations used in patient selection for antireflux surgery are lacking. We aimed at generating key recommendations in the selection of patients for antireflux surgery. DESIGN We included 35 international experts (gastroenterologists, surgeons and physiologists) in a Delphi process and developed 37 statements that were revised by the Consensus Group, to start the Delphi process. Three voting rounds followed where each statement was presented with the evidence summary. The panel indicated the degree of agreement for the statement. When 80% of the Consensus Group agreed (A+/A) with a statement, this was defined as consensus. All votes were mutually anonymous. RESULTS Patients with heartburn with a satisfactory response to PPIs, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH), patients with oesophagitis Los Angeles (LA) grade B or higher and patients with Barrett's oesophagus are good candidates for antireflux surgery. An endoscopy prior to antireflux surgery is mandatory and a barium swallow should be performed in patients with suspicion of a HH or short oesophagus. Oesophageal manometry is mandatory to rule out major motility disorders. Finally, oesophageal pH (±impedance) monitoring of PPI is mandatory to select patients for antireflux surgery, if endoscopy is negative for unequivocal reflux oesophagitis. CONCLUSION With the ICARUS guidelines, we generated key recommendations for selection of patients for antireflux surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ans Pauwels
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veerle Boecxstaens
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncological and Vascular Access Surgery, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Richard Berrisford
- Peninsula Oesophago-gastric Surgery Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy E Boeckxstaens
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Serhat Bor
- Gastroenterology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michele Cicala
- Digestive Diseases, Universita Campus Bio Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Maura Corsetti
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fernando Fornari
- Programa de Pós-Graduação: Ciências em Gastroenterologia e Hepatologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Chandra Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jan Hatlebakk
- Gastroenterology, Haukeland Sykehus, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Scott B Johnson
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA
| | - Toni Lerut
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lars Lundell
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sandro Mattioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Hiroto Miwa
- Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Philippe Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taher Omari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - John Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Thomas W Rice
- Thoracic Surgery, Emeritus Staff Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Philip Roelandt
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincenzo Savarino
- Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Universita di Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Hidekazu Suzuki
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Radu Tutuian
- Gastroenteroloy, Tiefenauspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tim Vanuytsel
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - David I Watson
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jan Tack
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|