Factors predicting chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a regression analysis of randomized trial comparing three different meshes with three fixation methods (FinnMesh Study)

Understanding patient experiences to improve care for females groin hernia

BACKGROUND

Thousands of females undergo inguinal hernia repair annually, yet females have been excluded from prior clinical trials evaluating inguinal hernia repairs. Research shows females face worse outcomes after hernia repair compared to males, including higher recurrence rates, increased chronic pain, and limited data to guide treatment. Prospective studies focused on optimizing outcomes for females are critically needed. Prior to conducting such trials, it is essential to obtain preliminary data from female participants to ensure that the studies are designed appropriately to address their priorities and improve sex disparities in outcomes.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted between July 7 and December 31, 2023, with 34 females evaluated for groin hernia. Interviews were conducted via Zoom at an academic medical center. The discussions aimed to explore the challenges in diagnosing hernias, the considerations for selecting treatment options, and the priorities for future research. The transcripts were analyzed using descriptive content analysis, facilitated by MAXQDA software.

RESULTS

Diagnostic challenges included delayed recognition due to underappreciation of female hernias. Participants desired greater familiarity with hernias and treatment options from providers. For surgical decisions, fear of complications drove some towards surgery, while others prioritized avoiding recovery time for asymptomatic hernias. Participants called for research on female-specific risk factors, pain experiences, recovery impacts, and non-operative approaches. The majority of participants agreed or considered participating and serving as an advisor in a future study.

CONCLUSION

Females with hernia face sex-based disparities in diagnosis and treatment. Improving provider awareness and developing guidelines are needed. This qualitative study identifies key areas for future research to optimize person-centered hernia care for females based directly on personal perspectives and priorities, laying the groundwork for prospective trials aimed at improving outcomes.

Matching males and females undergoing non mesh primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: evaluating sex differences in preoperative and acute postoperative pain

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare pain and related psychological factors during the preoperative and acute postoperative period between male and female patients, who underwent non mesh primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

After ethics approval, informed consent was obtained, and data were collected. Male and female participants were compared by manually matching one-to-one on 10 variables. Descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation and frequency) as well as numerical rating scales from 0 to 10 were used. Comparison tests were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test for categorical data and independent samples t-test or non-parametric equivalent tests for numerical scores. p < 0.05 is reported as statistically significant. To control type I error, Bonferroni correction was used.

RESULTS

72 participants with 36 matched pairs were included. Sex differences were found for operation length (p = .006), side of operation (p = .002), and hernia type (p = .013). Significant differences between the sexes were not found at the preoperative or postoperative time for resilience, pain interference or pain severity related measures, postoperative hernia pain incidence, pain catastrophizing, depression and anxiety symptoms, or return to normal activities.

CONCLUSION

When controlling for known confounders and using a conservative Type I error rate, pain and related factors between the sexes did not differ significantly.

Incidence and predictors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The mesh is currently the preferred treatment option for hernia repair surgery. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), lasting more than 3 months after surgery, is a complication that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Currently, there is a lack of evidence-based information describing the incidence and independent predictive factors of chronic pain, posing a serious challenge in clinical practice for devising personalized prevention strategies. Hence, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the incidence and predictive factors, aiming to provide a reference for developing plans to prevent chronic pain.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, with the retrieval cutoff date set at December 17, 2022. The included studies underwent assessment using the NOS scale, and subgroup analysis for the incidence was carried out based on different regions.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 18 studies were included, involving 29,466 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled incidence of chronic pain was 17.01% (95%CI 12.78% ~ 21.71%). The incidence was 18.65% (95%CI 13.59% ~ 24.29%) in Europe, 14.70% (95%CI 7.87% ~ 23.17%) in Asia, and 6.04%(95%CI 4.62 ~ 7.64) in North America. Furthermore, We also found that the risk factors for CPIP are younger age [OR = 2.261 (95%CI 1.126 ~ 4.549)], presence of other postoperative complications [OR = 1.849 (95%CI 1.034 ~ 3.305)], hernial sac defect < 3 cm [OR = 1.370 (95%CI 1.012 ~ 1.853)], being female [OR = 1.885 (95%CI 1.024 ~ 3.472)], postoperative pain [OR = 1.553 (95%CI 1.276 ~ 1.889)], preoperative pain [OR = 2.321 (95%CI 1.354 ~ 3.979)], and having a history of ipsilateral inguinal hernia repair [OR = 2.706 (95% CI 1.445 ~ 5.069)].

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of persistent pain following hernia repair surgery is high in current clinical practice, a concern that should not be overlooked. Stratified assessment tools need to be established for patients experiencing early chronic pain, and personalized follow-up strategies and preventive interventions should be developed for those with potentially high risks. These measures aim to enhance the quality of life for patients after hernia repair.

In vivo comparison of mesh fixation solutions in open and laparoscopic procedures for inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis

Background

Abdominal hernia repair surgeries involve the fixation of a surgical mesh to the abdominal wall with different means such as suture, tacks, and glues. Currently, the most effective mesh fixation system is still debated. This review compares outcomes of mesh fixation in different surgical procedures, aiding surgeons in identifying the optimal technique.

Methods

A meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between January 2003 and January 2023 were searched in electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mesh fixation with cyanoacrylate-based or fibrin glues with classical fixation techniques (sutures, tacks) in open and laparoscopic procedures were included.

Results

17 RCTs were identified; the cumulative study population included 3919 patients and a total of 3976 inguinal hernias. Cyanoacrylate-based and fibrin glues were used in 1639 different defects, suture and tacks in 1912 defects, self-gripping mesh in 404 cases, and no mesh fixation in 21 defects. Glue fixation resulted in lower early postoperative pain, and chronic pain occurred less frequently. The incidence of hematoma was lower with glue fixation than with mechanical fixation. Recurrence rate, seroma formation, operative and hospitalization time showed no significant differences; but significantly, a higher number of people in the glue group returned to work by 15- and 30-days after surgery when compared to the tacker and suture groups in the same time frame.

Conclusion

Cyanoacrylate and fibrin glue may be effective in reducing early and chronic pain and hematoma incidence without increasing the recurrence rate, the seroma formation, or the operative and hospitalization time.

Transvaginal Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: One-Year Safety and Efficacy Results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh by comparing conventionally used polypropylene (PP) mesh in tension-free vaginal mesh (TVM) surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of patients who underwent TVM using a PTFE or PP mesh. PTFE was used from June 2019 to May 2021, and PP mesh from January 2018 to May 2019. Outcomes included POP recurrence, perioperative complications, and patient satisfaction. Restricted mean survival time was used to analyze POP recurrence, comparing the time to recurrence between the two groups at 1year after TVM.

RESULTS

Of 171 patients, 104 underwent PP mesh placement (PP group) and 67 underwent PTFE mesh placement (PTFE group). POP recurrence was observed in 10 and nine patients in the PP and PTFE groups, respectively. The mean time until the recurrence in the PTFE group was significantly shorter than that in the PP group (restricted mean survival time difference: -20.3days; 95% CI, -40.1 to -0.5; P = .044). Subgroup analysis revealed the meantime until recurrence was significantly shorter in the PTFE group for postoperative periods 3months or less, ages >70years, and POP stage ≥3. There were no intervention cases in either group and no significant differences in the perioperative complications. Patient satisfaction was greater in the PTFE group after 3months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

TVM surgery with a PTFE mesh is more prone to recurrence than that with a PP mesh, but with higher patient satisfaction. Within 3months of surgery, elderly patients and those with advanced-stage POP require care to prevent recurrence.

Definition of Mesh Weight and Pore Size in Groin Hernia Repair: A Systematic Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

Introduction: Groin hernia literature often uses the terms light- and heavyweight and small or large pores to describe meshes. There is no universal definition of these terms, and the aim of this scoping review was to assess how mesh weight and pore sizes are defined in the groin hernia literature. Methods: In this systematic scoping review, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We included randomised controlled trials with adults undergoing groin hernia repair with the Lichtenstein or laparoscopic techniques using a flat permanent polypropylene or polyester mesh. Studies had to use the terms lightweight, mediumweight, or heavyweight to be included, and the outcome was to report how researchers defined these terms as well as pore sizes. Results: We included 48 studies with unique populations. The weight of lightweight meshes ranged from 28 to 60 g/m2 with a median of 39 g/m2, and the pore size ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 mm with a median of 1.6 mm. The weight of heavyweight meshes ranged from 72 to 116 g/m2 with a median of 88 g/m2, and the pore size ranged from 0.08 to 1.8 mm with a median of 1.0 mm. Only one mediumweight mesh was used weighing 55 g/m2 with a pore size of 0.75 mm. Conclusion: There seems to be a consensus that meshes weighing less than 60 g/m2 are defined as lightweight and meshes weighing more than 70 g/m2 are defined as heavyweight. The weight terms were used independently of pore sizes, which slightly overlapped between lightweight and heavyweight meshes.

Mesh fixation techniques in Lichtenstein tension-free repair: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS

To compare the clinical effectiveness of different mesh fixation techniques in Lichtenstein tension-free repair using network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched until 1 December 2020, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes between different mesh fixation techniques were included. The primary endpoints were chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and hernia recurrence. The second endpoint was seroma and infection. Data were processed using Stata MP16.0, and R x64 3.6.1.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that 32 RCTs (n = 6362) were eligible for pooling. Six types of mesh fixation techniques were used: non-absorbable suture, absorbable suture, chemical glue, fibrin glue, self-gripping mesh, and staple fixation. Network meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of CPIP with fibrin glue was lower than that with non-absorbable sutures (relative risk [RR] = 0.23, 95% credibility interval [95%CrI] [0.09, 0.50]), absorbable sutures (RR = 0.24, 95%CrI [0.08, 0.60]), chemical glue (RR = 0.36, 95%CrI [0.13, 0.87]), and self-gripping mesh (RR = 0.27 95%CrI [0.09, 0.62]). Self-gripping mesh was superior to non-absorbable sutures (RR = 0.44, 95%CrI [0.23, 0.74]) in reducing postoperative infection.

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis suggests that fibrin glue might be best for reducing CPIP and recurrence. However, a large-scale RCT is warranted to confirm the results.

Postoperative pain and pain-related health-care contacts after open inguinal hernia repair with Adhesix™ and Progrip™: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

Self-fixed mesh is an alternative to suture mesh fixation in inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain after open inguinal hernia surgery using self-fixed meshes.

Methods

A randomized clinical trial comparing self-adhesive mesh (Adhesix™) and self-gripping mesh (Progrip™) was conducted from November 2018 through March 2021. Patients included were male, 18–85 years old, and suitable for day case surgery. The primary endpoint was the number of patients needing follow-up visits due to postoperative pain during the first 3 postoperative months. Secondary endpoints included the intensity of pain, the time of return to work and normal daily activities, quality of life measures and postoperative complications.

Results

270 patients were enrolled, 132 received Adhesix™ mesh (A group) and 138 Progrip™ mesh (P group), 231 (85.6%) completed 1- or 3-month follow-up. The number of patients needing follow-up for postoperative pain was significantly higher in the P group (19 vs. 4, p = 0.001). The P group had higher numeric rating scale of pain while coughing (P 0.50 vs. A 0.20, p = 0.024) and during exercise (P 1.02 vs. A 0.60, p = 0.057) at 3 months postoperatively. The time of return to normal activity was 16.6 days in the A group and 22.9 days in the P group, (p = 0.004). The postoperative day being fit for work was sooner for the A group (14.3 days vs 17.8 days, p = 0.009).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated an advantage of self-adhesive mesh over self-gripping mesh with respect to acute postoperative pain and thus faster recovery after surgery.

Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have analyzed predictors for chronic pain after open hernia repair. The purpose of this study is to determine which factors predict the development of chronic pain after a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair between 2008 and 2020 at a single institution. Quality of life was measured using the Surgical Outcomes Measurement System and Carolinas Comfort Scale. We categorized patients with chronic pain if their score on Carolinas Comfort Scale was greater than or equal to 3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of chronic pain.

RESULTS

A total of 960 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 59 (± 14, standard deviation) years, 89 (9.3%) of whom were female. Six percent of patients met criteria for chronic pain (Carolinas Comfort Scale ≥3). On multivariable analysis, predictors for chronic pain were age 45 (P < .001), female sex (P = .006), preoperative pain visual analog scale ≥1 (P = .025), prior inguinal hernia repair (P = .045), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = .041), use of multifilament polyester mesh (P = .0448), and intraoperative placement of a urinary catheter (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair results in 6.0% of patients experiencing chronic pain. We identified multiple predictors for chronic pain.

A retrospective cohort study of open preperitoneal repair versus open suture repair for the treatment of emergency femoral hernia

To compare the outcomes of open preperitoneal repair (OPR) with the use of mesh and open suture repair (OSR) without mesh via inguinal approach for the treatment of emergency femoral hernia (FH). The primary outcome was the postoperative complication and the secondary outcomes were the recurrence rate of FH and the postoperative comfort level at the surgical site. 104 patients with emergency FHs were included, of whom 51 patients were treated with OPR, 53 patients were treated with OSR. Between the two groups, no significant difference was found in surgical site infection (SSI) (P = 0.801) or seroma (P = 0.843), while there was significant difference in the improvement of comfort at the surgical site (P = 0.013). The results of the 2-year follow-up demonstrated 1 and 8 cases of recurrence in the OPR and OSR group respectively, which was statistically significant (HR, 8.193 [95% CI, 1.024 to 65.547], P = 0.047). Compared with OSR, OPR with the use of mesh did not increase the risk of SSI and was safe to apply even under the condition of an emergency FH operation with intestine resection; OPR could reduce the recurrence rate of FH and improve the comfort at the surgical site.