1
|
Sanna A, Targa S, Mantovan B, De Luca M. The Enhanced-View Totally Extraperitoneal Repair for Ventral and Incisional Hernia: Midterm Results of an Evolving Technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2025; 35:48-54. [PMID: 39648768 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In the field of abdominal wall hernias, several innovative procedures have been developed, including the extended/enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair technique. Initially introduced for laparoscopic hernia repair by J. Daes, it was subsequently applied to ventral hernia repair (VHR) and incisional hernia repair (IVHR) by I. Belyansky et al. This article presents the midterm experience and outcomes of our center's experience with the endoscopic technique based on the principles of eTEP during IVHR and VHR. Method: A review was conducted of a prospectively collected database of abdominal wall hernia. Patients who underwent eTEP VHR or IVHR between October 2018 and February 2021 were identified. Results: A total of 51 patients underwent an eTEP-RS or eTEP-TAR procedure, with a 24-month follow-up period. Of the 51 patients included in the study, 43 underwent eTEP-RS treatment, while 8 required an additional transversus abdominis release (3 unilaterally). One patient developed a large hematoma necessitating reoperation and drainage via the eTEP approach. Seven patients developed seromas, which were treated conservatively, while 2 patients experienced surgical site infections, which were managed with a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system. Two patients exhibited recurrence at sites above the epigastric edge of the mesh. Conclusion: Moreover, the advancement of minimally invasive surgical techniques for abdominal wall reconstruction has rendered the eTEP approach a viable option for both primary and incisional VHR, with promising midterm outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Sanna
- Department of General Surgery, Aulss 5 Polesana, Viale Tre Martiri, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Simone Targa
- Department of General Surgery, Aulss 5 Polesana, Viale Tre Martiri, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Barbara Mantovan
- Department of General Surgery, Aulss 5 Polesana, Viale Tre Martiri, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Maurizio De Luca
- Department of General Surgery, Aulss 5 Polesana, Viale Tre Martiri, Rovigo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henriksen NA, Helgstrand F, Jensen KK. Short-term outcomes after open versus robot-assisted repair of ventral hernias: a nationwide database study. Hernia 2024; 28:233-240. [PMID: 38036692 PMCID: PMC10891222 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02923-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The robotic platform is widely implemented; however, evidence evaluating outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair is still lacking. The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes after open and robot-assisted repair of primary ventral and incisional hernias. METHODS Nationwide register-based cohort study with data from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database and the National Danish Patients Registry was from January 1, 2017 to August 22, 2022. Robot-assisted ventral hernia repairs were propensity score matched 1:3 with open repairs according to the confounding variables defect size, Charlson comorbidity index score, and age. Logistic regression analyses were performed for factors associated with length of stay > 2 days, readmission, and reoperation within 90 days. RESULTS A total of 528 and 1521 patients underwent robot-assisted and open repair, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in days was 0.5 versus 2.1 for robot-assisted and open approach, respectively (P < 0.001) and open approach was correlated with risk of length of stay > 2 days (OR 23.25, CI 13.80-39.17, P < 0.001). The incidence of readmission within 90 days of discharge was significantly lower after robot-assisted repair compared to open approach (6.2% vs. 12.1%, P < 0.001). Open approach was independently associated with increased risk of readmission (OR 21.43, CI 13.28-39.17, P = 0.005, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair is safe and feasible and associated with shorter length of stay and decreased risk of readmission compared with open ventral hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Henriksen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - F Helgstrand
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | - K K Jensen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hager M, Edgerton C, Hope WW. Primary Uncomplicated Ventral Hernia Repair: Guidelines and Practice Patterns for Routine Hernia Repairs. Surg Clin North Am 2023; 103:901-915. [PMID: 37709395 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Surgical repair of primary umbilical and epigastric hernias are among the most common abdominal operations in the world. The hernia defects range from small (<1 cm) to large and complex even in the absence of prior incision or repair. Mesh has generally been shown to decrease recurrence rates, and its use and location of placement should be individualized for each patient. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches provide unique considerations for the technical aspects of primary repair with or without mesh augmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Hager
- Department of Surgery, Novant/New Hanover Regional Medical Center, 2131 South 17th Street, PO Box 9025, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA
| | - Colston Edgerton
- Department of Surgery, Novant/New Hanover Regional Medical Center, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 2131 South 17th Street, PO Box 9025, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA
| | - William W Hope
- Department of Surgery, Novant/New Hanover Regional Medical Center, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 2131 South 17th Street, PO Box 9025, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:3260-3271. [PMID: 36764936 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09922-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The eTEP technique is a new approach that has recently gained popularity in abdominal wall hernia surgery. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the eTEP-RS and IPOM-plus procedures in W1 and W2 midline incisional abdominal wall hernia (IAWH) repairs performed by the same surgeon. METHODS Prospectively collected data of laparoscopic abdominal wall repairs performed on 61 patients with eTEP between November 2018 and April 2022 and on 67 patients with IPOM-plus between January 2016 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 74 out of 128 patients, 30 in the eTEP-RS group and 44 in the IPOM-plus group, who underwent W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 24 months in the eTEP-RS group and 45 months in the IPOM-plus group. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, or active smoking. No difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the mean defect area (MDA, 28.17 cm2 vs. 27.41 cm2, p = 0.84), but the mean mesh area (MMA) and mesh/defect (M/D) ratio were higher in the eTEP-RS group (404.11 cm2 vs. 267.85 cm2, p < 0.001 and 20.96 vs. 12.36, p = 0.004). In the eTEP-RS group, the hospital length of stay (LOS) (1.48 days vs. 2.58 days, p < 0.001) and pain on the first and 10th postoperative days were significantly lower (p < 0.001), while the operative time was significantly longer (204.07 min vs. 88.33 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative complications (p = 0.56), seroma formation (p = 0.83), or recurrence (p = 0.83). CONCLUSION The eTEP-RS technique has advantages over the IPOM-plus approach, such as a shorter LOS and less early postoperative pain with W1-W2 midline IAWH repair. However, the eTEP technique has a longer operative time.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaida D, Miyata T, Kin R, Nishiki H, Hashimoto A, Fujii Y, Miura S, Fujita J, Tomita Y, Nakamura N, Miyashita T, Fujita H, Ueda N, Takamura H. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair of a large incisional hernia in a kidney transplantation patient: A case report. Asian J Endosc Surg 2022; 15:180-183. [PMID: 33993626 PMCID: PMC9290791 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A 73-year-old woman presented to our hospital because of painful bulging in the right lower abdomen, and developed a 17 × 12 cm incisional hernia after kidney transplantation using right oblique incision. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair was performed. Since a transplanted kidney is close to the abdominal wall defect, the space between the transplanted kidney and the abdominal wall was peeled off to secure enough space for the mesh to be place. After that the fascial defect was detected precisely, and the polypropylene-polyglycolic acid composite mesh was fixed with 3 cm overlapping of the hernia ring by non-absorbable tacks. The patient was discharged 9 days after surgery. In general, abdominal incisional hernias after kidney transplantation are relatively large with boundary defect of abdominal wall ensuing between the abdominal and allograft. However, laparoscopic IPOM repair of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation can be performed safely and effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Kaida
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Takashi Miyata
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Ryosuke Kin
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Hisashi Nishiki
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Akifumi Hashimoto
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Yoritaka Fujii
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Seiko Miura
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Jun Fujita
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Yasuto Tomita
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Naohiko Nakamura
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Tomoharu Miyashita
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Hideto Fujita
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Nobuhiko Ueda
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Takamura
- Department of General and Digestive SurgeryKanazawa Medical University HospitalKahokuJapan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
What is the reality in epigastric hernia repair?-a trend analysis from the Herniamed Registry. Hernia 2021; 25:1083-1094. [PMID: 33837884 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02408-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The proportion of epigastric hernias in the total collective of all operated abdominal wall hernias is 3.6-6.9%. The recently published guidelines for treatment of epigastric hernias of the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society recommend the use of a mesh for defect size of ≥ 1 cm, i.e., a preperitoneal flat mesh technique for sizes 1-4 cm, and laparoscopic IPOM technique for defects > 4 cm and/or obesity. Against that background, this analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry now aims to explore trends in epigastric hernia repair. METHODS To detect trends, the perioperative outcome was calculated separately for the years 2010 to 2019 and the 1-year follow-up for the years 2010 to 2018 and significant differences were identified. Analysis was based on 25,518 primary elective epigastric hernia repairs. The rates of postoperative surgical complications, pain at rest, pain on exertion, chronic pain requiring treatment and recurrence associated with the various surgical techniques were calculated separately for each year. Fisher's exact test for unadjusted analysis between years was applied with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing. RESULTS The proportion of laparoscopic IPOM repairs declined from 26.0% in 2013 to 18.2% in 2019 (p < 0.001). Instead, the proportion of open sublay repairs rose from 16.5% to 21.8% (p < 0.001). That was also true for innovative techniques such as the EMILOS, MILOS, eTEP and preperitoneal flat mesh technique (8.3% vs 15.3%; p < 0.001). This change in indication for the various surgical techniques led to a significant improvement in the postoperative surgical complication rate (3.8% vs 1.9%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The trend is for epigastric hernia repair to be performed less often in laparoscopic IPOM technique and instead more often in open sublay technique or the new innovative techniques.
Collapse
|
7
|
Quezada N, Grimoldi M, Besser N, Jacubovsky I, Achurra P, Crovari F. Enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach for the treatment of abdominal wall hernias: mid-term results. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:632-639. [PMID: 33528665 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08330-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple minimally invasive techniques have been described for ventral hernia repair. The recently described enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia repair seems an appealing option since it allows to address midline and lateral hernias, placing the mesh in the retromuscular position without the use of traumatic fixation. AIM To report on the mid-term result of a series of patients with ventral hernias repaired by the eTEP approach. METHODS A retrospective analysis of our case series between June 2017 and December 2019. Demographic and clinical data were gathered. Hernia characteristics, surgical details, hernia recurrences, and complications are reported. RESULTS 66 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 22 months (interquartile range 12-26). 60% of patients were male. Mean age, BMI, % of Type-2 diabetes and % of smoking were 59 ± 12 years, 30 kg/m2, 24% and 23%, respectively. Mean hernia defect size was 5.5 ± 2.9 cm. Forty-three eTEP Rives-stoppa and 23 eTEP-Transversus abdominis release (14 unilateral, 9 bilateral) were performed. 22 inguinal hernias and 15 lateral defects were simultaneously repaired. We report 1 recurrence (1.5%) and 10 surgical site occurrences (15%; 6 seromas, 2 hematomas and 2 surgical site infections). Four patients required reinterventions (6%). CONCLUSION eTEP is a promising approach to treat midline hernias and allows the simultaneous treatment of lateral and inguinal defects, keeping the mesh in the retromuscular position. However, comparative studies must be performed to know its real benefit in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolás Quezada
- Surgery Division, Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 362 Diagonal Paraguay, 4th Floor, Office 410, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile.
| | - Milenko Grimoldi
- Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicolás Besser
- Surgery Division, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ioram Jacubovsky
- General Surgery Service, Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pablo Achurra
- Surgery Division, Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 362 Diagonal Paraguay, 4th Floor, Office 410, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile
| | - Fernando Crovari
- Surgery Division, Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 362 Diagonal Paraguay, 4th Floor, Office 410, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Henriksen NA, Friis-Andersen H, Jorgensen LN, Helgstrand F. Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: nationwide database study. BJS Open 2021; 5:6100248. [PMID: 33609381 PMCID: PMC7893453 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias decreases the incidence of wound complications compared with open repair, there has been rising concern related to intraperitoneal mesh placement. The aim of this study was to examine outcomes after open or laparoscopic elective incisional hernia mesh repair on a nationwide basis. Methods This study analysed merged data from the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patient Registry on perioperative information, 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation for complication, and long-term operation for hernia recurrence among patients who underwent primary repair of an incisional hernia between 2007 and 2018. Results A total of 3090 (57.5 per cent) and 2288 (42.5 per cent) patients had surgery by a laparoscopic and open approach respectively. The defect was closed in 865 of 3090 laparoscopic procedures (28.0 per cent). The median follow-up time was 4.0 (i.q.r. 1.8–6.8) years. Rates of readmission (502 of 3090 (16.2 per cent) versus 442 of 2288 (19.3 per cent); P = 0.003) and reoperation for complication (216 of 3090 (7.0 per cent) versus 288 of 2288 (12.5 per cent); P < 0.001) were significantly lower for laparoscopic than open repairs. Reoperation for bowel obstruction or bowel resection was twice as common after laparoscopic repair compared with open repair (20 of 3090 (0.6 per cent) versus 6 of 2288 (0.3 per cent); P = 0.044). Patients were significantly less likely to undergo repair of recurrence following laparoscopic compared with open repair of defect widths 2–6 cm (P = 0.002). Conclusion Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia should still be considered for fascial defects between 2 and 6 cm, because of decreased rates of early complications and repair of hernia recurrence compared with open repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Henriksen
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | | | - L N Jorgensen
- Digestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - F Helgstrand
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, Berrevoet F, East B, Fischer J, Hope W, Klassen D, Lorenz R, Renard Y, Garcia Urena MA, Simons MP. Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg 2020; 107:171-190. [PMID: 31916607 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs are frequently performed surgical procedures with an expected low complication rate. Nevertheless, the optimal method of repair with best short- and long-term outcomes remains debatable. The aim was to develop guidelines for the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. METHODS The guideline group consisted of surgeons from Europe and North America including members from the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) critical appraisal checklists, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument were used. A systematic literature search was done on 1 May 2018, and updated on 1 February 2019. RESULTS Literature reporting specifically on umbilical and epigastric hernias was limited in quantity and quality, resulting in a majority of the recommendations being graded as weak, based on low-quality evidence. The main recommendation was to use mesh for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias to reduce the recurrence rate. Most umbilical and epigastric hernias may be repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh. A laparoscopic approach may be considered if the hernia defect is large, or if the patient has an increased risk of wound morbidity. CONCLUSION This is the first European and American guideline on the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. It is recommended that symptomatic umbilical and epigastric hernias are repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Henriksen
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | - A Montgomery
- Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - R Kaufmann
- Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Tergooi, Hilversum, the Netherlands
| | - F Berrevoet
- Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B East
- Third Department of Surgery at Motol University Hospital, First and Second Faculty of Medicine at Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Fischer
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - W Hope
- New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
| | - D Klassen
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - R Lorenz
- Praxis 3+ Chirurgen, Berlin, Germany
| | - Y Renard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - M A Garcia Urena
- Henares University Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, Francisco de Vitoria University, Madrid, Spain
| | - M P Simons
- Department of Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fiori F, Ferrara F, Gentile D, Gobatti D, Stella M. Totally Endoscopic Sublay Anterior Repair for Ventral and Incisional Hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:lap.2018.0807. [PMID: 30807248 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic technique is a valid and safe approach for the treatment of abdominal wall defects. To combine the advantages of complete endoscopic extraperitoneal surgery with those of sublay mesh repair we propose Totally Endoscopic Sublay Anterior Repair (TESAR) a safe and feasible approach for the treatment of ventral and incisional midline hernias. METHODS From May to November 2018, 12 patients were referred to our unit for clinical and radiological diagnosis of midline ventral or incisional hernia and selected for TESAR. Exclusion criteria were: complicated ventral or incisional hernia (i.e., incarcerated hernia), maximum defect width >7 cm, and contraindications to general anesthesia. RESULTS All procedures were completed with endoscopic approach, with no conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery. No intraoperative complications were registered. Total mean operative time was 148 ± 18.5 minutes. No postoperative major complications were registered. Only one subcutaneous seroma was registered (8.3%) and treated conservatively. The mean postoperative stay was 2.6 ± 0.6 days. CONCLUSIONS TESAR is a safe and feasible technique for the extraperitoneal sublay repair of ventral hernias with a totally endoscopic approach. It provides accurate hernia repair with good outcomes in terms of resolution of symptoms and postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Fiori
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ferrara
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Gentile
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Gobatti
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Stella
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|