Biventricular assistance with 2 hm3 in a small chest patient: extra-pericardial implant

Three-month outcomes after the implantation of two HeartMate 3 devices in total artificial heart configuration

BACKGROUND

Total artificial heart (TAH) implantation is a rarely performed procedure. Contrarily, left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is rather common in many centers. As transplantation is quantitatively limited cardiac replacement with artificial hearts is a viable alternative in the treatment of severe biventricular heart failure. An alternative to TAH is the implantation of two VADs in a TAH configuration. We hereby present the first multi-center study on 3-months outcomes of patients treated by cardiectomy and placement of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated a cohort of 15 patients that underwent HM3-TAH-implantation at three international institutions. Follow-up was 3 months after implantation. Baseline, intra- and postoperative parameters as well as survival data and adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 1089 days on HM3-TAH were observed. Thirty-day survival after HM3-TAH implantation was 53% (8/15) and three month survival was 40% (6/15). The longest duration on device was 274 days. Causes of death were multi-organ failure, sepsis, and neurological adverse events. No technical complications were documented. Two patients remained on the device. Four patients (26%) were successfully bridged to transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration is a last resort and off-label concept in cases of extreme biventricular heart failure. In a diligently selected patient cohort, HM3-TAH implantation is a feasible method to increase the chance of survival in a severely ill patient cohort and successfully bridge patients to heart transplantation that would otherwise have died.

Evaluation of Centrifugal Blood Pump Performances for Biventricular Support in Virtual Simulation Model

BACKGROUND

Despite the advances in the left ventricular assist device (LVAD), there are still situations that require a biventricular assist device (BVAD) system. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare the system performance interactions with the HeartMate3 (HM3) and HeartWare (HVAD) in a BVAD configuration using the virtual mock loop (VML) simulation tool.

METHODS

The VML simulation tool is an in silico implementation of a lumped parameter model of the cardiovascular system with mechanical circulatory support. Patients with ejection fractions of 60%, 20%, and 15% were simulated in VML, and the HVAD and HM3 in a BVAD with ventricular cannulation were applied to simulated conditions. Pump speeds that restored baseline normal hemodynamics were determined. To determine the optimal speeds for BVAD, the left and right arterial pressures (LAP, RAP) were plotted.

RESULTS

In the HVAD, LAP and RAP balanced at 11 mm Hg with LVAD 3,500 rpm, right ventricular assist device (RVAD) 2,200 rpm; at 13 mm Hg with LVAD 3,000 rpm, RVAD 1,700 rpm; and at 14 mm Hg with LVAD 2,500 rpm, RVAD 1,300 rpm. For the HM3, at 8 mm Hg with LVAD 7,000 rpm, RVAD 5,000 rpm; at 9 mm Hg with LVAD 6,000 rpm, RVAD 4,300 rpm; and at 9.5 mm Hg with LVAD 5,000 rpm, RVAD 3,500 rpm.

CONCLUSION

The RVAD/LVAD speed ratios required for atrial balance were approximately 0.6 for the HVAD and 0.7 for the HM3. However, the HVAD required RVAD speeds below its range of operation.