A comparison of bone loss in early and late rheumatoid arthritis using quantitative phalangeal ultrasound

Clinical utilities of quantitative ultrasound in osteoporosis associated with inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Secondary osteoporosis is an important co-morbidity related to inflammatory rheumatic diseases that is attributed to several factors including inflammatory cytokines, inactivity and glucocorticoid treatment. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been utilized in osteoporosis research due to its detectability of bone density as well as bone quality. The current narrative review is to address the potential utilities of QUS in secondary osteoporosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, focusing on the clinical aspects of QUS in these diseases, based on the conformity of QUS with dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the relationship with disease characteristics, and its capability of fracture prediction. Although limited data demonstrate that QUS had moderate to strong correlation with DXA, and might be useful as a potential imaging tool to screen for osteoporosis, further research is still required for QUS to be utilized effectively for the best outcome in these patients with rheumatic diseases.

Quantitative ultrasound in osteoporosis and bone metabolism pathologies

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been introduced in the medical field for the study of bone tissue to identify changes in the tissue that could suggest the presence of osteoporosis and bone fragility. The ultrasound technique is simple, versatile, and its low cost and lack of ionizing radiation have led to the diffusion of this method worldwide. The present article is an overview of the most relevant developments in the field of quantitative ultrasound, in clinical and experimental settings. The advantages and limitations of the present technique and suggestions for its use in the clinical practice are reported.

Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a non-invasive technique for the investigation of bone tissue in several pathologies and clinical conditions, especially in the field of osteoporosis. The versatility of the technique, its low cost and lack of ionising radiation have led to the diffusion of this method worldwide. Several studies have been conducted in the last years to investigate the potential of QUS in multiple areas with promising results; the technique has been applied in the prediction of osteoporotic fractures, in monitoring therapies, in the investigation of secondary osteoporosis, in paediatrics, neonatology and genetics. Our review article gives an overview of the most relevant developments in the field of quantitative ultrasound, both in clinical and in experimental settings.

Relationship between risk factors and QUS in a European Population: The OPUS study

There are many risk factors associated with low bone mineral density. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a generally accepted method for measurement of bone and has been shown to be strongly associated with future fracture risk. The Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS) is a multi-centre European wide study examining 5 different QUS scanners (4 calcaneal, 1 finger device). The aim of this paper was to examine the relationship between risk factors (as assessed by questionnaire) and QUS measurements. 449 younger women (aged 20 to 39 years) and 2283 older women (aged 55 to 79 years) were included in this analysis. As expected, those with a self-reported previous fracture had lower QUS measurements than those without (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was seen between those reporting a maternal hip fracture and those who did not report such an event. Differences were found for smokers vs. non-smokers for SOS but not for BUA measurements. Weight was positively correlated with all BUA variables but only with some SOS variables. We determined which risk factors were most strongly associated with QUS measurements by using step-wise multiple regression. Models for each QUS measurement were calculated, and the R2 values ranged from 0.18 to 0.28 for SOS, 0.27 to 0.32 for BUA and 0.31 to 0.42 for the finger QUS device. The most common risk factors across all models were age, use of hormone replacement therapy, self-reported previous fracture, self-reported diagnosis of osteoporosis, current weight, pulse rate and self-reported estimated height at age 20 years. We analysed relationships across the 5 centres and detected some geographical differences in the prevalence of the risk factors. In conclusion, similar relationships are seen with QUS measurements as are found for bone mineral density. However, the strength of the association is dependent on the type of QUS device and variable measured.

Noninvasive techniques for assessing skeletal changes in inflammatory arthritis: imaging technique

New imaging techniques such as ultrasound and MRI are likely to play increasing roles in the future management of patients with inflammatory arthritis, particularly those with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies. Ultrasound has a number of distinct advantages including its ability to scan multiple joints, safety, and immediately availability in clinic. MRI, however, is more sensitive and has a greater field of view because of its tomographic nature. Both modalities have the added advantage over radiography in that they can image soft tissue as well as bone. Dual X-ray absorptiometry already has an established role to play in the assessment of osteoporosis, but new techniques such as digital radiogrametry, quantitative CT, and ultrasound potentially will have a more important role to play in the future.