Long-term, interventional, open-label extension study evaluating the safety of tocilizumab treatment in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis from Poland and Russia who completed the global, international CHERISH trial

Effect of biologic treatments on growth in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review

Children with Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) often experience growth retardation due to various factors. The advent of biologic therapies has revolutionized the management of aggressive forms of JIA. This systematic review aims to provide updated insights into the impact of biologic treatments on growth retardation in pediatric JIA patients. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible articles. Included were cohort studies, trials, and retrospective studies that evaluated growth outcomes in children with JIA receiving biologic therapy. Twelve studies published between 2003 and 2018 were analyzed, encompassing 1513 patients with a mean age of 11.4 years. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors were the predominant biologic agents used (75.8%), with a mean follow-up duration of 2 years post-biologic therapy initiation. Growth assessment criteria included Height Standard-deviation-score (HSDS), growth velocity, and height velocity (cm/year). Before biologic treatment, 15% of patients exhibited growth delay, while 75.4% had impaired growth. Following biologic therapy, growth delay decreased to 8% and impaired growth to 36.8%. Patients with systemic JIA showed lower changes in growth parameters compared to others, and no significant differences were observed between different biologic drugs. However, lower growth velocity changes were noted in patients treated with multiple biologic agents. Two studies suggested that growth catch-up was most pronounced during the first year of treatment. This systematic review highlights the potential of biologic therapies in mitigating growth impairment associated with JIA. Despite observed positive effects, further research is warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of the JAK Inhibitors and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Treating Children With Nonsystemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety profiles of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when used with or without methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of nonsystemic forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (nsJIA).

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating efficacy and safety outcomes of JAKi or bDMARDs for the nsJIA population up to 2023 were searched in ClinicalTrial.gov, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Bayesian arm-based network meta-analysis compared efficacy as measured by Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-American College of Rheumatology 70 (JIA-ACR70) improvement and safety based on rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) among all therapies.

RESULTS

Eligible studies included 45 citations from 16 RCTs (7 parallel and 9 withdrawal trials) with a total of 1,821 participants that investigated nine bDMARDs, three with and six without MTX co-treatment, and two JAKis (tofacitinib and baricitnib). The reported SAE incidence rates ranged from 0 to 0.3 per person-year of follow-up; none of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. The JIA-ACR70 improvement by 16 weeks of treatment ranged from 11.3% to 89.5%. Compared with controls, significant JIA-ACR70 improvements were observed for etanercept, golimumab, and all three combination therapies (adalimumab+MTX, etanercept+MTX, and infliximab+MTX), with odds ratios ranging from 2.97 to 3.99. No significant pairwise comparisons between bDMARDs and JAKi versus bDMARDs were noted.

CONCLUSION

Overall, no significant evidence was found for efficacy and safety profiles in pairwise comparisons of JAKis and bDMARDs. Future studies will expand the meta-analysis by including non-RCT studies and individual participant data.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review of Phase III Clinical Trials

Background/objectives: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood, leading to severe disability and negatively affecting patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the adoption, reporting and assessment methodology of HRQoL in phase III clinical trials involving children with JIA. Methods: An electronic and manual search was conducted to identify primary and secondary publications of pharmacological trials conducted between 2012 and 2023. Data were extracted and recorded in duplicate. Results: A total of 222 studies were screened and 24 articles (22 primary and 2 secondary publications) were included in the review. HRQoL was not listed among the endpoints in 10 trials (45.5%), while it was a secondary endpoint in 12 trials (54.5%). The proportion of trials that did not consider HRQoL was equally relevant in both for-profit and no-profit settings (44.4% versus 50.0%), but it was higher in studies on systemic JIA compared to other JIA subtypes (62.5%), and on IL inhibitor treatment (72.7%) with respect to other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Information on HRQoL was usually collected from parents/caregivers, and only three studies were categorized as "probably robust" with regard to HRQoL assessment. Conclusions: Systematic incorporation of HRQoL measures represents an urgent need in pediatric rheumatology, aiding clinicians in their decision-making in relation to treatment effectiveness and considering the children's perspective.

Clinical outcomes of tocilizumab therapy in polyarticular and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a single-center analysis (2018-2022)

This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tocilizumab (TOC) in children with polyarticular (pJIA) and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) who exhibited inadequate responses to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological modifiers (bDMARDs). Conducted at the Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation in Warsaw, Poland, between 2018 and 2022, the study enrolled 29 patients diagnosed with JIA based on International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria. The cohort comprised 13 sJIA and 16 pJIA patients, aged 2-18 years, receiving TOC treatment for 24 months. Safety and efficacy assessments included analysis of medical documentation, laboratory tests (CRP, ESR, WBC), and Juvenile Disease Activity Score (JADAS) 71 at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment initiation. Significant reductions in CRP and ESR levels were observed within three months, with sustained improvement in JADAS71 scores over the 24-month treatment period. A substantial majority, 73.07% of patients, achieved inactive disease status or low disease activity, highlighting T0C's effectiveness. Adverse effects were manageable, predominantly involving mild to moderate infections, with no serious adverse events or instances of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). The study also noted a steroid-sparing effect of TOC, with a reduction in glucocorticoid usage among the cohort. Tocilizumab demonstrates substantial efficacy in reducing disease activity and improving clinical outcomes in patients with pJIA and sJIA, coupled with a favorable safety profile. These findings reinforce the role of TOC as a critical component of the therapeutic arsenal for JIA, offering hope for improved quality of life and disease management in this patient population.

Does MRI Distinguish Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis from Other Causes of Progressive TMJ Destruction?

PURPOSE

Similarities in initial presentations of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement from juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), idiopathic condylar resorption, and other forms of progressive TMJ destruction in children create diagnostic confusion. Treatment pathways, however, depend on determination of etiology. The purpose of this study was to compare TMJ magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of patients with joint degeneration localized to the TMJs to those with JIA and TMJ involvement.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including subjects younger than 18 years that presented from February 2008 to October 2019 with clinical TMJ degeneration, a gadolinium-enhanced TMJ MRI and a negative pediatric rheumatologic workup ("non-JIA" group), and a series of age and sex-matched subjects with TMJ degeneration on gadolinium-enhanced MRI and JIA ("JIA group"). MRIs were evaluated in a blinded fashion by 1 pediatric radiologist. The primary outcome variable was the radiologist's accuracy in predicting study grouping, assessed in 1 randomly-selected joint per patient. Secondary outcome variables included MRI characteristics of inflammation, osseous damage and articular disc morphology. Independent samples t-tests, sensitivity/specificity, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests were computed as applicable, and P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The sample included 34 subjects: 16 non-JIA (75% female, age 13.9 ± 2.8 years) and 18 JIA (77% female, age 13.6 ± 2.8 years) (P ≥ .738). The radiologist correctly classified 64.7% of subjects as non-JIA or JIA (P = .078, sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 31.3%). Inflammatory and osseous findings were similar between groups (P ≥ .073). The disc was anteriorly displaced in 9 non-JIA and 0 JIA joints (P < .001, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%) and flattened in 3 non-JIA and 14 JIA joints (P = .006, sensitivity = 38.9%, specificity = 90.6%).

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory and osseous findings on gadolinium-enhanced TMJ MRIs are insufficient to determine the etiology of progressive TMJ destruction. Disc characteristics, however, significantly differ between JIA and non-JIA etiologies and may be important in differentiating these conditions.

Age-related mechanisms in the context of rheumatic disease

Ageing is characterized by a progressive loss of cellular function that leads to a decline in tissue homeostasis, increased vulnerability and adverse health outcomes. Important advances in ageing research have now identified a set of nine candidate hallmarks that are generally considered to contribute to the ageing process and that together determine the ageing phenotype, which is the clinical manifestation of age-related dysfunction in chronic diseases. Although most rheumatic diseases are not yet considered to be age related, available evidence increasingly emphasizes the prevalence of ageing hallmarks in these chronic diseases. On the basis of the current evidence relating to the molecular and cellular ageing pathways involved in rheumatic diseases, we propose that these diseases share a number of features that are observed in ageing, and that they can therefore be considered to be diseases of premature or accelerated ageing. Although more data are needed to clarify whether accelerated ageing drives the development of rheumatic diseases or whether it results from the chronic inflammatory environment, central components of age-related pathways are currently being targeted in clinical trials and may provide a new avenue of therapeutic intervention for patients with rheumatic diseases.

Safety updates in novel therapeutics for pediatric rheumatic disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biologics and novel targeted therapeutics have transformed the management of pediatric rheumatic diseases over the past two decades; however, questions about short-term and long-term safety remain. Safety data gathered from recent clinical trials, long-term extensions of prior trials, registries, and other real-world evidence are summarized here for biologics and novel therapeutics commonly prescribed for pediatric rheumatic diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

With nearly 20 years of therapeutic experience, tumor necrosis inhibitors (TNFi) are generally well tolerated, although infections, malignancy, and development of new autoimmunity remain a concern. Risk of infections may be higher in IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors, and lower in abatacept, compared with TNFi. Safety data for B-cell-targeted therapeutics and janus kinase inhibitors are emerging, but remain limited, especially in children.

SUMMARY

Biologic and novel targeted therapeutics offer a promising future for children with pediatric rheumatic disease. However, long-term safety data in children remain limited for several agents. With any therapeutic option, both short-term and long-term safety concerns must be weighed against individual clinical needs when choosing the optimal treatment for each child.

Tocilizumab in management of refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 10 years of experience at tertiary university hospital

Background

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most prevalent pediatric rheumatic disorder. Progress in modalities of therapy improves the disease outcome. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in the management of systemic (sJIA) and polyarticular (pJIA) in children who are resistant to conventional as well as other biological therapies. In this retrospective study, we selected JIA patients according to the International League of Association for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria and were treated with TCZ. Response to TCZ was assessed using Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-10 (JADAS-10) and also outcomes were assessed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) remission criteria. Safety of the drug was assessed by documenting possibly related adverse effects (AE). Statistical analysis using SPSS version 25 with statistical significance is considered if p ≤ 0.05. We included 16 JIA patients aged ≤ 18 years but 2 of them were excluded as they developed severe reaction during the TCZ 1st dose, so finally, 14 patients were included.

Results

The median age of our patients was 12 years. Of these 14 patients, 9 (64.3%) had sJIA and 5 (35.7%) had pJIA. TCZ use led to significant improvement in the JADAS-10 from mean 22.4 (± 7.9) when it was initially assessed and then 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after TCZ initiation with means 5.7 (± 3.9), 4.4 (± 3.7), 3.5 (± 3.1), and 2.7 (± 2.2), (P = 0.001, 0.001, 0.005, 0.012), respectively. Five patients exhibited TCZ possibly expected side effects. Neutropenia and infusion-related reactions were the most frequent AE.

Conclusions

Tocilizumab seems to be generally effective and safe drug in the management of sJIA and pJIA especially in cases refractory to conventional as well as other biologic agents.

Translating IL-6 biology into effective treatments

In 1973, IL-6 was identified as a soluble factor that is secreted by T cells and is important for antibody production by B cells. Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, the IL-6 pathway has emerged as a pivotal pathway involved in immune regulation in health and dysregulation in many diseases. Targeting of the IL-6 pathway has led to innovative therapeutic approaches for various rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still’s disease, giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis, as well as other conditions such as Castleman disease and cytokine release syndrome. Targeting this pathway has also identified avenues for potential expansion into several other indications, such as uveitis, neuromyelitis optica and, most recently, COVID-19 pneumonia. To mark the tenth anniversary of anti-IL-6 receptor therapy worldwide, we discuss the history of research into IL-6 biology and the development of therapies that target IL-6 signalling, including the successes and challenges and with an emphasis on rheumatic diseases.

In this Perspective article, the authors recount the earliest stages of translational research into IL-6 biology and the subsequent development of therapeutic IL-6 pathway inhibitors for the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases and potentially numerous other indications.

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in a real-life observational cohort of patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objectives

To evaluate the patterns of usage, efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in polyarticular JIA.

Methods

An observational study of 56 consecutive polyarticular JIA patients was conducted using patient charts and electronic JIA databases. Efficacy was assessed by tocilizumab survival, rates of low disease activity (LDA) and of inactive disease by 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-10), and of clinically inactive disease according to Wallace’s preliminary criteria. Efficacy and rate of adverse events (AEs) were evaluated during a 24-month period after tocilizumab commencement.

Results

Tocilizumab was started on average as third-line biological agent (median, range first- to fourth-line) at a median disease duration of 5.2 years (interquartile range 3.0–7.7). Survival rates were 82% at 12 months and 64% at 24 months. The reasons for discontinuation were inadequate treatment effect in 50%, AE plus inadequate treatment effect in 37.5% and AE alone in 12.5%. LDA (JADAS-10 ⩽3.9) was reached in 58% at 12 months and in 84% at 24 months, inactive disease (JADAS-10 ⩽0.7) in 19% and 44%, and clinically inactive disease in 28% and 46%, respectively. The rate of AEs was 200.9/100 patient years and of serious AEs 12.9/100 patient years.

Conclusion

Survival of tocilizumab was high and a large proportion of the treatment-resistant patients reached LDA at 12 months of treatment. The LDA rate continued to increase throughout 24 months. The rates of AEs and serious AEs were higher than in register studies but lower than in the originator study of tocilizumab.

Comparison of adverse events of biologicals for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review

Objectives: Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis has changed rapidly since the introduction of various biologics almost twenty years ago. Many clinical trials have been performed to monitor efficacy and safety of new agents. The aim of this review is to summarize safety concerns, which were observed during prospective clinical trials. Methods: Since etanercept was the first biologic approved and remains the most frequently used, as first biologic in polyarticular JIA patients, the authors calculated the relative risk of the adverse events for all examined biologicals and compared the values with the value of etanercept. Results: Relative rates for all adverse events showed similar rates for etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, and tocilizumab, whereas adalimumab showed higher rates and abatacept lower rates. Comparison of rates for serious adverse events demonstrated, that rates seemed comparable for etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, and tocilizumab. Again, abatacept showed a lower rate, whereas golimumab seems to have a higher relative risk for serious adverse events. Rate of infection was lowest in patients treated with abatacept or tocilizumab, patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab and Infliximab again had similar rates. Conclusion: The safety profiles of actually approved biologics are highly acceptable. However, further observation, especially long-term observation through registry studies, is required.

Interleukin-6 in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic childhood arthritis. Its pathogenesis is very complicated, with the involvement of not only immune cells but various types of parenchymal cells, and is affected by both genetic and environmental predispositions. The clinical spectrum from inflammation to related conditions is largely mediated by cytokines including interleukin (IL)-6. Fluctuations in IL-6 and its related molecules can modulate the pathogenesis and the clinical presentation positively or negatively. The recent clinical impact of IL-6 blockade on JIA has begun a therapeutic paradigm shift. This review describes the characteristics of JIA, mainly focused on IL-6 with the current therapeutic perspective.