Characterisation of first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections for the treatment of people with foot and ankle osteoarthritis: a systematic review

Objective

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly used in the management of foot and ankle OA. Although current clinical guidelines advocate the judicious use of corticosteroid injection as an adjunct therapy, none of these recommendations are specific to the foot and ankle. Therefore, the aim of this review is to examine the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injections in people with foot or ankle OA.

Methods

Four databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL) and one clinical trial register (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP]) were searched from inception to June 2024 for randomized control trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating corticosteroid injection in the treatment of foot or ankle OA on pre-specified outcomes: pain, function, quality of life, safety (adverse events) and/or cost-effectiveness. Two independent reviewers conducted record screening, data extraction (Cochrane data extraction tool) and assessment of methodological quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool [RoB 2.0]).

Results

From 1711 citations, two RCTs (57 participants, 49% males) were identified. There were no differences in pain or function over 8 weeks after a single injection of intra-articular corticosteroid compared with prolotherapy for treatment of first metatarsal joint OA. Pain and function significantly improved in people having three corticosteroid injections combined with hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid injections alone for treatment of post-traumatic subtalar OA. Methodological quality was graded as some concerns in both trials.

Conclusion

There is insufficient evidence to guide the use of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for OA of the foot or ankle. Future robust research is needed to provide reliable evidence for this commonly performed treatment.

Development of an Ultrasound Imaging Atlas for Grading Osteoarthritis in the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound (US) imaging may play a fundamental role in the earlier detection and assessment of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) osteoarthritis (OA) because of its ability to depict tissue-specific morphologic changes before the point of irreversible structural damage. However, the role of US in supporting the diagnosis of OA in foot joints has not been clearly defined. The aims of this study were to develop a semiquantitative US atlas (the AUT ultrasound imaging [AUTUSI] atlas) to grade the degree of osteoarthritic change in the first MTPJ and to evaluate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reproducibility of using the atlas.

METHODS

US images were obtained from 57 participants (30 participants with radiographically confirmed first MTPJ OA). The AUTUSI atlas supports the examination of grading joint effusion, synovial hypertrophy, synovitis, osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and cartilage thickness. Six examiners used the atlas to independently grade 24 US images across 2 sessions. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reproducibility were determined using percentage agreement and Gwet's AC2.

RESULTS

Observations using the AUTUSI atlas demonstrated almost perfect-to-perfect interexaminer agreement (percentage agreement ranged from 96% to 100%, and Gwet's AC2 values ranged from 0.81 to 1.00) and moderate-to-perfect intraexaminer agreement (percentage agreement ranged from 67% to 100%, and Gwet's AC2 values ranged from 0.54 to 1.00).

CONCLUSION

The AUTUSI atlas demonstrated excellent intraexaminer and interexaminer reproducibility for evaluating first MTPJ joint effusion, synovial hypertrophy, synovitis, joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and cartilage thickness. The AUTUSI atlas affords an opportunity to detect prognostic markers of OA earlier in the disease cascade and has the potential to advance understanding of the pathologic process of first MTPJ OA.

Classification and Radiology

The classification systems of hallux rigidus, including the Coughlin and Shurnas, Hattrup and Johnson, Regnauld, and Roukis classifications, allow for a comprehensive understanding of the condition's severity and aid in informed treatment decisions. The common techniques of radiological imaging, such as standard plain film radiographs, MRI, magnetic resonance arthrography computed tomography (CT), weightbearing CT, and ultrasound, which enable accurate assessment of joint degeneration and associated pathologies for optimal patient care, are reviewed.

A Retrospective Study Assessing the Clinical Outcomes After Cheilectomy and Subchondroplasty for Hallux Rigidus

Introduction Hallux rigidus (HR) refers to osteoarthritis of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint, resulting in stiffness, pain, and limitation in daily function. Surgery of HR is indicated in those who have failed a trial of non-operative management and is typically divided into joint-preserving (JP) and joint-sacrificing procedures. Cheilectomy is the most commonly practiced JP procedure, often done in conjunction with associated procedures for HR. Our paper aims to report the clinical outcomes after cheilectomy and cheilectomy done with subchondroplasty (SCP) performed for HR. Methods All patients who underwent cheilectomy for HR between 2017 and 2022 were identified and had their outcomes evaluated at the time of this review. The patients had their pre-operative radiographs and clinical and operative notes analyzed for the grading of HR. Functional outcomes were assessed with the use of the visual analog scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, as well as comparing the pre-operative and post-operative degree of dorsiflexion of the affected first metatarsophalangeal joint. This study was approved by the SingHealth Institutional Review Board (IRB) Institution with approval number 2021/2629. Results A total of 19 patients and 20 feet were included in our study at a mean follow-up of 29.8 months. There was an increase in dorsiflexion of the first MTP joint by 27.2 degrees (p-value = <0.0001). Patients who underwent cheilectomy alone (Group 1) had a mean improvement in VAS scores of 5.46 (p-value = <0.0001). Patients who underwent SCP of the first metatarsal head along with cheilectomy (Group 2) had an improvement in VAS scores by 5.78 (p-value = 0.0007). There was a mean improvement in AOFAS scores of 25.6 (p-value = <0.0001) for patients in Group 1. Patients in Group 2 had a mean improvement in AOFAS scores of 31.0 (p-value = 0.0003). Conclusion Both cheilectomy and cheilectomy performed with SCP for HR show good outcomes at short-term follow-up (mean 29.8 months). Cheilectomy is a viable alternative to arthrodesis for the surgical treatment of HR even in patients with higher grades. The use of SCP should be further explored as an adjunct in the surgical treatment of HR.

International Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis Consortium review and research agenda for diagnosis, epidemiology, burden, outcome assessment and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the available evidence relating to the diagnosis, epidemiology, burden, outcome assessment and treatment of foot and ankle osteoarthritis (OA) and to develop an agenda to guide future research.

METHOD

Members of the International Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis Consortium compiled a narrative summary of the literature which formed the basis of an interactive discussion at the Osteoarthritis Research Society International World Congress in 2021, during which a list of 24 research agenda items were generated. Following the meeting, delegates were asked to rank the research agenda items on a 0 to 100 visual analogue rating scale (0 = not at all important to 100 = extremely important). Items scoring a mean of 70 or above were selected for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of the 45 delegates who attended the meeting, 31 contributed to the agenda item scoring. Nineteen research agenda items met the required threshold: three related to diagnosis, four to epidemiology, four to burden, three to outcome assessment and five to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Key knowledge gaps related to foot and ankle OA were identified, and a comprehensive agenda to guide future research planning was developed. Implementation of this agenda will assist in improving the understanding and clinical management of this common and disabling, yet relatively overlooked condition.