Aspirin or anticoagulation after cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Optimal Antithrombotic Regimen After Cryptogenic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Although several antithrombotic strategies have been investigated for the management of cryptogenic strokes, ie, ischemic strokes without known etiologies, an optimal antithrombotic strategy for cryptogenic strokes is unknown. We aim to assess oral antithrombotic agents' comparative efficacy and safety after cryptogenic stroke to identify an optimal treatment.A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science until February 2024. We used the random-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using a risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using R, version 4.3.1.Seven RCTs with 15,240 patients were included. None of the OACs showed a significant efficacy in preventing all-cause mortality, stroke recurrence, cardiovascular mortality, and major adverse cardiac events compared to aspirin. Also, safety measures were similar between different OACs and aspirin regarding safety measures, including major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. However, only rivaroxaban significantly increased the incidence of major bleeding (RR: 2.69, CI [1.67, 4.33]).There was no difference between various OACs and aspirin regarding efficacy and safety outcomes. There is a greater risk of major bleeding with rivaroxaban. Further research is still warranted to define a personalized strategy for selecting antithrombotic strategies after cryptogenic stroke on a case-by-case basis.

Net clinical benefit of PFO closure versus medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The ideal treatment for patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke remains controversial and is being evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the net clinical benefit (NCB) between PFO closure and medical treatment.

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases from inception until January 2022. The primary outcomes were the NCB-1, defined as the cumulative incidence of stroke, major bleeding, atrial fibrillation/flutter, and serious procedural or device complications; the NCB-2 and NCB-3 were defined as NCB1 but using a weighted factor of 0.5 and 0.25 for atrial fibrillation/flutter events, respectively. We also evaluated each component outcome of NCB as a secondary outcome. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each outcome were calculated (random-effects model).

RESULTS

Our analysis included six RCTs (n = 3750 patients). The rates of NCB-1, NCB-2, and NCB-3 were not different between PFO closure and medical treatment. The heterogeneity between trials was low to moderate. Stroke showed a significant relative decrease of 44% (95% CI, 21-60%), favoring the PFO closure arm. Atrial fibrillation/flutter increased by 4.04 times (95% CI, 1.57-8.89) in the PFO closure compared with the medical treatment group. In a meta-regression analysis, the reduction in NCB-1 with PFO closure increased as the proportion of patients treated with the Amplatzer device increased (p = 0.02), and the reduction in NCB-1, NCB-2, and NCB-3 with PFO closure increased as the proportion of patients treated with substantial PFO size increased (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The NCB between PFO closure and medical treatment was not different, suggesting individualized treatment to maximize benefit.

Secondary stroke prevention in patients with patent foramen ovale

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an established risk factor for cryptogenic ischemic stroke, strategies for secondary prevention remain controversial. Increasing evidence over the past decade from well designed clinical trials supports transcatheter PFO closure for selected patients whose stroke was likely attributable to the PFO. However, patient selection using imaging findings, clinical scoring systems, and in some cases, thrombophilia testing, is crucial for determining patients most likely to benefit from closure, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have found that patients with a high Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score and those with a thrombophilia benefit more from closure than medical therapy (including antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy) alone. Meta-analyses have demonstrated an increased short-term risk of atrial fibrillation in closure patients, and that residual shunt after closure predicts stroke recurrence. Last, recent data have been inconclusive as to whether patients receiving medical therapy only benefit more from anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, so this remains an area of controversy.

SUMMARY

Transcatheter PFO closure is an evidence-based, guideline-supported therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with a PFO and cryptogenic stroke. However, proper patient selection is critical to achieve benefit, and recent studies have helped clarify those patients most likely to benefit from closure.

[Patent foramen ovale. An update for primary care]

Patent foramen ovale (FOP) is the most prevalent cause of cryptogenic strokes in people under 60 years old. Although it is usually asymptomatic, it has a high risk of producing paradoxical embolism and, therefore, stroke with indeterminate outcomes. The study should be started based on clinical suspicion, and includes a multidisciplinary assessment and a determination of the type of treatment to be performed. The therapeutic possibilities range from conservative treatment (indefinite antithrombotic treatment), to its percutaneous closure (currently the most widely used). The first objective is to decrease the number of stroke recurrences. Conservative treatment should be reserved for those cases of low embolic risk. The risk assessment must be individualised, fundamentally based on the anatomical characteristics of the FOP and the patient clinic picture. The use of the RoPE risk scale (The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) should be a tool to consider.

Treatment Strategies for Cryptogenic Stroke Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale: What Do We Choose?

IMPORTANCE

The treatment of cryptogenic stroke patients with patent foramen ovale to prevent recurrence of stroke, especially when patients consider drug prevention alone, has caused serious treatment dilemmas in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety and efficacy of different treatment strategies using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in this population with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale.

STUDY SELECTION

PUBMED, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, WangFang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched to identify RCT comparing different treatment strategies. Eleven randomized studies were included (n = 5706).

MAIN OUTCOMES

The primary efficacy outcome was recurrence of ischemic stroke, including fatal and non-fatal ischemic strokes. The primary safety outcome was major hemorrhage, but closure surgery includes systemic thrombotic events, persistent atrial fibrillation, surgical deaths and other major events.

RESULTS

In terms of efficacy and safety events, compared with antiplatelet, the OR of vitamin K antagonists for stroke recurrence was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.41-1.6), the OR of surgical closure was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.16-0.63), and the OR of NOAC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.27-2.3). Compared with antiplatelet, the safety event OR of vitamin K antagonists was 1.7 (95% CI, 0.65-4.8), the OR of surgical closure was 1.7 (95% CI, 0.68-3.8), and the OR of NOAC was 2.2 (95% CI, 0.67-7.6).

CONCLUSION

In terms of effectiveness, surgical occlusion has the best performance, while anticoagulation is the second best. Vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K antagonists are difficult to distinguish between the best in effectiveness. Antiplatelet drugs are considered the worst option. Regarding the safety results, it is generally believed that there are no obvious beneficial interventions, but antiplatelet drugs are considered to be relatively best, followed by surgical intervention and vitamin K antagonists, and non-vitamin K antagonists are considered to be the least safe.

The Correlation Between Migraine and Patent Foramen Ovale

Background: Migraine is a widespread neurological disorder. The patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a remnant of the fetal circulation. Multiple studies suggest that migraine is more prevalent in subjects with PFO and vice versa. It is unclear if there is a causal relationship or simply a co-existence of these two conditions. Furthermore, the treatment of migraine with percutaneous closure PFO remains controversial.

Methods: We reviewed studies pertaining to the relationship between PFO and migraine as well as the effects of treatments on migraine attacks.

Results: We briefly summarized potential pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine, and elaborated on migraine type, frequency, and clinical symptoms of migraine with PFO and the clinical features of PFO with migraine. We also addressed the effects of PFO closure on migraine attacks.

Conclusion: The evidence supports a “dose-response” relationship between migraine and PFO although more work needs to be done in terms of patient selection as well as the inclusion of an antiplatelet control group for PFO closure interventions to uncover possible beneficial results in clinical trials.

Clinical RoPE (cRoPE) score predicts patent foramen ovale detection among stroke patients: a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUD

The role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in cryptogenic stroke (CS) is debated. Tools to predict PFO occurrence and attributable fraction are needed to guide cost-effective diagnostics and treatment. Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score relies on neuroimaging findings, which might be inconclusive in up to 30% of cases.

METHODS

We developed a clinical-based easy tool to predict the presence and attributable fraction of PFO in CS patients, without using neuroimaging. The clinical RoPE (cRoPE) score, ranging 1-10, was elaborated through Delphi method from the original RoPE score, replacing cortical infarction with the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification (lacunar stroke = 0 points, other subtypes = 1 point). Then, from the SISIFO (Studio Italiano di prevalenza nello Stroke Ischemico di pervietà del Forame Ovale, or Prevalence of Patent Foramen Ovale in Ischemic Stroke in Italy) study, a multicenter, prospective study on consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients (n = 1130) classified by Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and OCSP criteria and undergoing PFO testing, we selected the VV-CDC cohort (Vibo Valentia, Città di Castello, n = 323) to test the accuracy of cRoPE in predicting PFO detection. We compared cRoPE with RoPE to verify cRoPE reliability. Finally, we tested, through ROC analysis, the performance of cRoPE depending on TOAST classification.

RESULTS

Overall, PFO was detected in 21% in VV-CDC and in 23.4% in remaining SISIFO cohort (n = 807). cRoPE_AUC and RoPE_AUC were similar in VV-CDC. cRoPE performance was comparable with RoPE among CS (cRoPE_AUC 0.76, 95%CI 0.67-0.85, RoPE_AUC 0.75, 95%CI 0.66-0.84). Moving to the remaining SISIFO cohort, cRoPE confirmed satisfactory accuracy in predicting PFO detection in CS patients (cRoPE_AUC 0.71, 95%CI 0.66-0.78, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions: cRoPE might help in stratification of patients with CS, allowing accurate esteem of the likelihood of PFO to be found, especially in cases when neuroimaging is inconclusive.

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: State of the Art

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common abnormality affecting between 20% and 34% of the adult population. For most people, it is a benign finding; however, in some people, the PFO can open widely to enable paradoxical embolus to transit from the venous to arterial circulation, which is associated with stroke and systemic embolisation. Percutaneous closure of the PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke has been undertaken for a number of years, and a number of purpose-specific septal occluders have been marketed. Recent randomised control trials have demonstrated that closure of PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke is associated with reduced rates of recurrent stroke. After a brief overview of the anatomy of a PFO, this article considers the evidence for PFO closure in cryptogenic stroke. The article also addresses other potential indications for closure, including systemic arterial embolisation, decompression sickness, platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome and migraine with aura. The article lays out the pre-procedural investigations and preparation for the procedure. Finally, the article gives an overview of the procedure itself, including discussion of closure devices.