The prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoporosis and multiple sclerosis: Exploring the complex intersection between bone and brain, a clarion call for change

Osteoporosis is a common but often underrecognized condition in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), occurring more frequently and at an earlier age compared to the general population. It leads to an increased risk of fractures due to reduced bone mineral density (BMD). This review identifies key risk factors contributing to osteoporosis in PwMS, including age, vitamin D deficiency, reduced mobility, and long-term corticosteroid use. In addition to these factors, shared inflammatory mechanisms between MS and osteoporosis, such as elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, further exacerbate bone loss. Strategies for early identification and proactive management are also discussed, highlighting their importance in reducing fracture risk and improving outcomes. The ultimate aim is to promote tailored pharmacological treatments, effective interventions, and comprehensive management of osteoporosis in PwMS.

Bone loss and fracture in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) exhibit reduced bone mineral density (BMD) across several anatomical regions. Studies have indicated that PwMS are at a heightened risk of fractures due to decreased BMD and increased prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fracture among PwMS.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through comprehensive searches of databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) from January 1, 2000, to January 21, 2024. R software version 4.4.0 and random-effects models were employed to estimate the pooled prevalence, odds ratio (OR), and risk ratio (RR) of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fracture among PwMS, along with their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

From a total of 2039 articles, 51 studies with 1,503,785 PwMS met our inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and overall fracture among PwMS was 41.41 % (95 % CI: 36.14% to 46.69 %, I2=97 %), 14.21 % (95 % CI: 10.75 % to 17.68 %, I2=99 %), and 12.84 % (95 % CI: 8.49 % to 17.19 %, I2 = 100 %), respectively. The likelihood of osteopenia (OR=2.02, 95 % CI: 1.46 to 2.8, p-value<0.01, I2=17 %) and osteoporosis (OR=1.71, 95 % CI: 1.27 to 2.31, p-value<0.01, I2=74 %), as well as the probability of overall fracture (RR=1.86, 95 % CI: 1.61 to 2.14, p-value<0.01, I2=74 %) were significantly higher in PwMS than healthy controls (HCs).

CONCLUSION

PwMS were at a substantially increased risk of developing osteopenia (2-fold), osteoporosis (1.7-fold), and overall fractures (1.9-fold). Well-designed studies are needed to explore these associations further.

Prevalence of osteoporosis in the Iranian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The prevalence of osteoporosis increases as the population ages. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of osteoporosis among the general population ≥ 50 years old in Iran.

Methods

Multiple databases including Scopus, WOS, Medline, Embase, and Persian databases (SID and Magiran) were systematically searched to identify relevant research papers. All population-based studies estimating the prevalence of osteoporosis in the Iranian population were included and imported into Endnote software. Two authors independently reviewed the articles. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software, and a significance level of 0.05 was applied to the analyses.

Results

Totally 2117 documents were retrieved from the databases up until October 11, 2022. After reading the full texts, 10 documents were included in the study. Our results indicated that the pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in the femoral neck region was 0.19 (95%CI: 0.12-0.26) and 0.19 (95%CI: 0.13-0.25) for women and men, respectively. Pooled prevalence of spinal osteoporosis was 0.29 (95%CI: 0.21-0.38) among women and 0.16 (95%CI: 0.12-0.19) among men. The total pooled prevalence of osteoporosis was 0.38 (95%CI: 0.29-0.48) for women and 0.25 (95%CI: 0.22-0.29) for men.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the elevated prevalence of osteoporosis among individuals aged 50 years and older, with females exhibiting higher rates. Notably, osteoporosis in the femoral neck region demonstrated the lowest prevalence in both sexes. The implementation of comprehensive strategies is imperative to address osteoporosis problems effectively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01352-9.

Management of Osteoporosis, Fracture and Falls in People with Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review of Guidelines

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a higher prevalence of osteoporosis, falls and fractures. Guidelines for MS populations targeting the management of osteoporosis, fracture and falls risk may help reduce the burden of musculoskeletal disease in this population. We aimed to systematically review current guidelines regarding osteoporosis prevention, screening, diagnosis and management in people with MS. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of scientific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Scopus) was performed (n = 208). In addition, websites from MS organisations and societies were screened for clinical guidelines (n = 28). Following duplicate removal, screening and exclusions (n = 230), in total six guidelines were included in this review. Three of the identified guidelines were specific to managing osteoporosis in MS, while two linked vitamin D to bone health and one was focused on the effect of acute glucocorticoid use for MS exacerbations on bone health. All guidelines were found to contain inadequate recommendations for osteoporosis screening, management and treatment in people with MS given the evidence of higher prevalence of osteoporosis at an earlier age and compounding risk factors in this population. Early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in people with MS is necessary as fractures lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Development of structured clinical guidelines directed at specific healthcare services will ensure screening, appropriate management, and care of bone health in people with MS.

Medication and bone health in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are often prescribed medications associated with adverse effects on bone health. However, it is unclear whether these medications incur decreases in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and higher fracture risk in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of commonly used medications on aBMD and fracture risk among people with MS.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from their inception until February 5, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials as well as cross-sectional, retrospective, and prospective studies investigating whether glucocorticoids, immunomodulators, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, anxiolytics, opioids, or antipsychotics influenced aBMD or fracture risk in people with MS. Data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

We included 22 studies (n = 18,193). Six studies were included in the meta-analyses of glucocorticoid use and aBMD, whereas 2 studies were included in the medication use and fracture risk meta-analyses. No studies assessed the effect of antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, opioids, and antipsychotics on aBMD, and no studies assessed the effect of immunomodulators on fracture risk. Glucocorticoid use was significantly negatively associated with femoral neck aBMD (correlation = -0.21 [95% CI = -0.29 to -0.13]), but not with lumbar spine aBMD (correlation = -0.21 [95% CI = -0.50 to 0.12]). There were no differences in fracture risk between users of glucocorticoids (HR = 1.71 [95% CI = 0.04 to 76.47]), antidepressants (HR = 1.84 [95% CI = 0.09 to 38.49]), or anxiolytics (HR = 2.01 [95% CI = 0.06 to 64.22]), compared with nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence is insufficient to support a relationship between greater fracture risk for people with MS taking glucocorticoid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication, compared with nonusers, and it is unclear whether these medications are associated with bone loss in people with MS, beyond that in the general population. Additional high-quality studies with homogenous methodology exploring how medications influence aBMD and fracture risk in people with MS are required.

Screening for osteoporosis in people with MS: A new risk score

BACKGROUND

Due to the demographic development and improved treatment options, the role of comorbidities is of increasing importance in the medical care of people with MS (pwMS). A higher risk of osteoporosis is well known in chronic autoimmune diseases, and is also described in MS. While there are several screening guidelines in the elderly or in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, there are no generally accepted recommendations when to perform bone mineral testing in pwMS under the age of 65 years. We aimed to determine risk factors of osteoporosis in pwMS and to develop a risk score which can be applied in daily clinical routine.

METHODS

Densitometry (hip and lumbar spine) was performed in 159 pwMS aged ≤65 years and in 81 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). Osteoporosis was defined according to WHO criteria as a bone density 2.5 standard deviation or more below the mean of young adults. Risk factors were identified by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis occurred more frequently in postmenopausal pwMS and male pwMS as compared to HC. Besides age, sex, menopausal status in females, body-mass-index and smoking, a higher degree of disability - as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale - was identified as MS specific risk factor for osteoporosis, whereas the cumulative glucocorticoid dose was not associated with osteoporosis risk. Based on these risk factors, we developed an MS-specific risk score which allows to estimate the individual probability of osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

This risk score enables individual screening recommendation for pwMS and, subsequently, early prevention of osteoporosis which probably should result in reduction of fractures and morbidity.

High-Dose Intravenous Steroid Treatment Seems to Have No Long-Term Negative Effect on Bone Mineral Density of Young and Newly Diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Pilot Study

High-dose intravenous steroid treatment (HDIST) represents the first choice of treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Chronic oral glucocorticoid (GC) administration correlates with bone loss whereas data regarding HDIST in MS are still conflicting. Twenty-five newly diagnosed MS patients (NDMSP) (median age: 37 years) were prospectively studied for the effects of HDIST on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism. Patients received 1000 mg methylprednisolone intravenously every day for 5 days followed by oral prednisolone tapering over 21 days. Bone metabolism indices were determined prior to GC, on days 2, 4, 6, and 90, and at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 post GC therapy. Femoral, lumbar-spine BMD, and whole-body measurement of adipose/lean tissue were assessed prior to GC-administration and then every six months. Ten patients completed the study. N-terminal-propeptide-procollagen-type-1 and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase showed a significant increase at day-90 (p < 0.05). A transient non-significant fall of BMD was observed at 6 months after GC-administration, which subsequently appeared to be restored. We conclude that HDIST seems not to have long-term negative effects on BMD, while the observed transient increase of bone formation markers probably indicates a high bone turnover phase to GC-administration. Additional prospective studies with larger sample size are needed.

Mendelian randomization analysis of the causal association of bone mineral density and fracture with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disorder and an autoimmune disease. Until now, observational studies have indicated the association of bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture with the risk of MS. However, these studies indicated inconsistent findings. Until now, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted in BMD, fracture, and MS, which provide large-scale datasets to investigate the causal association of BMD and fracture with the risk of MS using the Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Here, we performed an MR study to clarify the causal association between BMD/fracture and the risk of MS using large-scale publicly available GWAS datasets from BMD, fracture, and MS. We first evaluated the bidirectional causal effects of BMD and MS. The main analysis method inverse-variance weighted (IVW) showed no significant causal effect of BMD on the risk of MS (β = 0.058, and p = 1.98E-01), and MS on the risk of BMD (β = −0.001, and p = 7.83E-01). We then evaluated the bidirectional causal effects of fracture and MS. However, we only identified a significant causal effect of fracture on the risk of MS using IVW (β = −0.375, p = 0.002), but no significant causal effect of MS on the risk of the fracture using IVW (β = 0.011, p = 2.39E-01). Therefore, our main analysis method IVW only found a significant causal effect of fracture on MS using the threshold for the statistically significant association p < 0.05/4 = 0.0125. Meanwhile, multivariable MR analyses showed that the causal effect of fracture on MS was independent of smoking, drinking, and obesity, but dependent on BMD. In summary, our MR analysis demonstrates that genetically increased fracture may reduce the risk of MS. Our findings should be further verified and the underlying mechanisms should be further evaluated by future studies.