Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the respiratory tract of medical intensive care unit patients

Risk factors for mortality in intensive care unit patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has been increasingly recognized as an opportunistic pathogen associated with high morbidity and mortality. Data on the prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 117 patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia admitted to the ICUs of two tertiary referral hospitals in South Korea between January 2011 and December 2022. To assess risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The median age of the study population was 71 years. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was 76.1% of cases, and the median length of ICU stay before the first isolation of S. maltophilia was 15 days. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 82.1%, and factors independently associated with mortality were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.09; P=0.046), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR, 1.21; 95%; CI, 1.02-1.43; P=0.025), corticosteroid use (OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 1.26-13.91; P=0.019), and polymicrobial infection (OR, 95% CI 0.07-0.69). However, the impact of appropriate antibiotic therapy on mortality was insignificant. In a subgroup of patients who received appropriate antibiotic therapy (n=58), antibiotic treatment modality-related variables, including combination or empirical therapy, also showed no significant association with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia in ICU have high mortality rates. Older age, higher SOFA score, and corticosteroid use were independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality, whereas polymicrobial infection was associated with lower mortality. The effect of appropriate antibiotic therapy on prognosis was insignificant.

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole vs Minocycline for the Treatment of Nonurinary Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections in Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic, gram-negative bacillus with few therapeutic options due to a high level of intrinsic resistance. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is recommended as the first-line treatment; however, minocycline (MIN) has been shown to have similar clinical outcomes in treating S. maltophilia and addresses concern for increasing resistance to SXT.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes of nonurinary, monomicrobial infections due to S. maltophilia in hospitalized patients treated with MIN or SXT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of hospitalized adult patients receiving MIN or SXT for nonurinary monomicrobial S. maltophilia infection from April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2020. The primary outcome was clinical disposition classified as rates of clinical failure, clinical improvement, or clinical success.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (88.2%) received MIN and 11 patients (11.8%) received SXT initially. Clinical failure occurred in 16 (19.5%) patients in the MIN group and in 4 (36.4%) patients in the SXT group (P = 0.242). Clinical improvement occurred in 11 (13.4%) patients in the MIN group and in 1 (9.1%) patient in the SXT group (P = 1.0). Clinical success occurred in 55 (67.1%) patients in the MIN group and in 6 (54.5%) patients in the SXT group (P = 0.503). Total duration of antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.3198), in-hospital mortality (P = 1.0), hospital length of stay (P = 0.9668), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (P = 0.1384), and 30-day readmission (P = 0.686) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Rates of clinical failure, clinical improvement, or clinical success were similar between MIN and SXT for nonurinary monomicrobial S. maltophilia infections.

Appropriate antibiotic therapy is a predictor of outcome in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia blood stream infection in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The study was to assess the relationship between antibiotic therapy and the outcome in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection (BSI).

METHODS

ICU patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia BSI from January 2004 to December 2019 were included and divided into two groups-those with- and without appropriate antibiotic therapy after BSI-for comparison. The primary outcome was the relationship between appropriate antibiotic therapy and 14-day mortality. The secondary outcome was the influence of different antibiotic therapies: levofloxacin- and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX)-containing regimens, on 14-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 214 ICU patients were included. Patients received appropriate antibiotic therapy (n = 133) after BSI had a lower 14-day mortality than those (n = 81) without appropriate antibiotic therapy (10.5% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001). No difference on 14-day mortality between groups of patients by time of appropriate antibiotic therapy was observed (p > 0.05). After a propensity score matching, the results is consistent that 14-day mortality were lower in patients with appropriate antibiotic therapy than those without appropriate antibiotic therapy (11.5% vs. 39.3%, p < 0.001). Among patients with S. maltophilia BSI receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy, there was a trend levofloxacin-containing regimens is associated with lower mortality than TMP/SMX-containing regimens (HR 0.233, 95% CI 0.050-1.084, p = 0.063).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with decreased 14-day mortality in ICU patients with S. maltophilia BSI regardless of time. Levofloxacin-containing regimens may be better choice than TMP/SMX -containing regimens in treating ICU patients with S. maltophilia BSI.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia in critical COVID-19 patients

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an environmental aerobic non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli, has gained attention in many nosocomial outbreaks. COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit have extended hospital stay and are severely immunosuppressed. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of S. maltophilia pneumonia in critical COVID-19 patients. A total of 123 COVID-19 patients in ICU admitted between March 2020 and March 2021 were identified from the authors' institutional database and assessed for nosocomial pneumonia. Demographic data and factors predisposing to S. maltophilia pneumonia were collected and analyzed. The mean age was 66 ± 13 years and 74% were males. Median APACHE and SOFA scores were 13 (IQR = 8-19) and 4 (3-6), respectively. The Median NEWS2 score was 6 (Q1 = 5; Q3 = 8). The Median ICU stay was 12 (Q1 = 7; Q3 = 22) days. S. maltophilia was found in 16.3% of pneumonia patients, leading to a lengthier hospital stay (34 vs. 20 days; p < 0.001). Risk factors for S. maltophilia pneumonia included previous treatment with meropenem (p < 0.01), thrombopenia (p = 0.034), endotracheal intubation (p < 0.001), foley catheter (p = 0.009) and central venous catheter insertion (p = 0.016). S. maltophilia nosocomial pneumonia is frequent in critical COVID-19 patients. Many significant risk factors should be addressed to reduce its prevalence and negative impact on outcomes.

A 20-year trend of prevalence and susceptibility to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a single secondary care hospital in Korea

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that can cause serious infection. We aimed to analyze the prevalence and susceptibility rates to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole of S. maltophilia. We conducted a retrospective study of S. maltophilia isolates from a university hospital from 2001 to 2020. Clinical information, the numbers of isolates and susceptibility rates were analyzed by year. Susceptibility rates and changes in respiratory and non-respiratory samples were compared. 1805 S. maltophilia isolates were identified, of which 81.4% (1469/1805) were from respiratory samples. There was a male predominance and 52% of the isolates were from general wards. The average susceptibility rate was 87.7% and there was no significant annual trend (P = .519). The susceptibility rate was 88.7% in respiratory samples and 84.1% in non-respiratory samples (P = .018). Susceptibility analyses using clinical data over long periods can guide the choice of antimicrobials especially for pathogen whose treatment options are limited.

Risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To systematically evaluate the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia for better clinical treatment.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Journal full-text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database (WanFang Data), VIP (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were selected and published by June 2022 about the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection of S. maltophilia. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and quality evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 18 articles were included, including 10 in English and 8 in Chinese. Meta analysis showed that the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by S. maltophilia included disease severity, hospitalization days, use of glucocorticoids, invasive procedures, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and use of more than 3 Antibiotics. The OR values of patients with hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, use of more than 3 Antibiotics, endotracheal intubation and tracheotomy were the highest. Specific hospitalization days (OR = 14.56, 95% CI: 6.12~23.01), mechanical ventilation (OR = 14.16, 95% CI: 5.85~34.3), use of more than 3 Antibiotics (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 1.24~31.14), tracheal intubation (OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 1.97~3.64), tracheotomy (OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 1.09~13.04).

Conclusion

There are many risk factors for lower respiratory tract infection of S. maltophilia, which can occur in patients with severe illness, high APACHE-II score, invasive procedures, and the need for broad-spectrum antibiotics. In terms of the host, these patients are characterized by impaired immune function, severe illness and long-term hospitalization, which objectively leads to the infection of S. maltophilia. Therefore, strengthening the monitoring, prevention and control of patients with risk factors of S. maltophilia infection is conducive to reducing the risk of infection and death.

Opportunistic Pathogens in Cystic Fibrosis: Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Lung Infection

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common life-shortening genetic diseases in Caucasians. Due to abnormal accumulation of mucus, respiratory failure caused by chronic infections is the leading cause of mortality in this patient population. The microbiology of these respiratory infections includes a distinct set of opportunistic pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia spp., Achromobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, anaerobes, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and fungi. In recent years, culture-independent methods have shown the polymicrobial nature of lung infections, and the dynamics of microbial communities. The unique environment of the CF airway predisposes to infections caused by opportunistic pathogens. In this review, we will highlight how the epidemiology and role in disease of these pathogens in CF differ from that in individuals with other medical conditions. Infectious diseases (ID) physicians should be aware of these differences and the specific characteristics of infections associated with CF.

Clinical challenges treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: an update

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a non-fermenting, Gram-negative bacillus that has emerged as an opportunistic nosocomial pathogen. Its intrinsic multidrug resistance makes treating infections caused by S. maltophilia a great clinical challenge. Clinical management is further complicated by its molecular heterogeneity that is reflected in the uneven distribution of antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants among different strains, the shortcomings of available antimicrobial susceptibility tests and the lack of standardized breakpoints for the handful of antibiotics with in vitro activity against this microorganism. Herein, we provide an update on the most recent literature concerning these issues, emphasizing the impact they have on clinical management of S. maltophilia infections.

Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Qatar: A Retrospective Study

Background

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a rapidly emerging nosocomial pathogen with intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms to several antibiotic classes. It can cause life-threatening opportunistic pneumonia, particularly among hospitalized patients. Incidence of infections by S. maltophilia has been reported as 0.07-0.4% of hospital discharges, but its mortality is 20 -60%. This is the first study from Qatar indexing the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility of S. maltophilia.

Materials and methods

This retrospective descriptive epidemiological study was conducted in 6 tertiary care hospitals under Hamad Medical Corporation in Doha, Qatar, analyzing inpatient respiratory isolates of S. maltophilia during 2016-17. Out-patients, children below 14 years, and non-respiratory samples except blood cultures in patients with pneumonia were excluded. Clinical records were reviewed to identify possible risk factors. Infection and colonization were identified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) algorithm for clinically defined pneumonia and statistically analyzed using the chi-square test and Pearson's correlation.

Results

S. maltophilia was isolated from 2.07% (317/15312) of all respiratory samples received in the microbiology lab during our study period. Three hundred seventeen patients studied had a mean age of 60 ± 20 years, and 68% were men. Most of the isolates were from sputum (179), followed by tracheal aspirate (82) and bronchoscopy (42). Fourteen blood culture samples from patients diagnosed with pneumonia were also included. 67% were hospitalized for more than two weeks, 39.1% were on mechanical ventilators, and 88% had received a broad-spectrum antibiotic before the event. 29.1% were deemed to have an infection and 70.9% colonization. Incidence of infection in those with Charlson’s Co-morbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3 was 36.5% compared to 24.2% in those with CCI < 3 (Relative Risk (RR)=1.52; 95% CI: 1.04,2.18; p=0.01). Patients with recent chemotherapy, immunosuppressant, or steroid use had a significantly higher infection risk than those without (69.2% v/s 23.3% RR=2.96; 95% CI:2.2,3.9; p<0.005). The most common symptoms in patients with infection were fever (96%) and expectoration (61.9%). The most common radiological finding was lobar consolidation (71.6%). Mean CRP and procalcitonin were 106.5±15.5 mg/l and 12.3 ± 14 ng/ml. Overall mortality was 16.3%. Patients on mechanical ventilator with IBMP-10 score ≥ 2 had 22.8% mortality compared to 5.7% in those with score < 2 (RR=3.9;95%CI:0.9,16.6; p<0.015). As per The US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CSLI) breakpoint values, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) showed the highest sensitivity (97.8%), followed by levofloxacin (71.6%). 0.3% of samples were pan-drug resistant.

Conclusions

S. maltophilia is a frequent nosocomial colonizer, but it can cause nosocomial pneumonia in almost one-third of cases, specifically in immunocompromised and patients with CCI ≥ 3 with a high risk of mortality due to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in those with IBMP-10 ≥ 2. Prolonged hospital stay is a risk factor for colonization by S. maltophilia, while recent chemotherapy, immunosuppressant, or steroid use are risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia due to S. maltophilia. TMP-SMX and levofloxacin are the only reliable agents for monotherapy of respiratory infections due to S. maltophilia in Qatar.

Risk Factors for Acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims:Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is increasingly found in critically ill patients, but it is considered a pathogen of limited pathogenicity and therefore it is not often targeted. We systematically evaluated risk factors for S. maltophilia pneumonia in ICU patients for better clinical management.

Methods: Prospective and retrospective studies of S. maltophilia infection in the ICU from database establishment to August 8, 2021, were searched through PubMed, web of science, Cochrane Library Embase and CNKI. The literature was independently screened and extracted by two authors according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated for quality by the NOS scale, and meta-analyzed by stata 14.0 software.

Results: A total of eight studies with a sample size of 2,320 cases were included. Meta-analysis showed that APACHE-II score > 20 (OR = 10.98, 95% CI: 5.67 ~ 21.26), COPD (OR = 3.97, 95% CI: 2.39 ~ 6.61), malignant tumor (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.03 ~ 4.50), mechanical ventilation (OR = 8.75, 95% CI: 2.59 ~ 29.58), tracheotomy (OR = 6.12, 95% CI: 2.06 ~ 18.18), endotracheal intubation (OR = 4.25, 95% CI: 2.30 ~ 7.84), β- Lactamase inhibitors (OR = 9.98, 95% CI: 1.51 ~ 65.96), aminoglycosides (OR = 4.01, 95% CI: 2.06 ~ 7.80), carbapenems (OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.49 ~ 5.31), and quinolones (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.21 ~ 3.89) were risk factors for ICU-acquired S. maltophilia pneumonia.

Conclusion: Many risk factors are associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia in ICU patients. Clinical workers should pay more attention to assessing the risk of infection in ICU patients and enhance the prevention and management of high-risk groups, which will help reduce their risk of S. maltophilia infection.

Diagnosis of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens of Pneumonia

Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia that are caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens represent a common and severe problem with increased mortality. Accurate diagnosis is essential to initiate appropriate antimicrobial therapy promptly while simultaneously avoiding antibiotic overuse and subsequent antibiotic resistance. Here, we discuss the main conventional phenotypic diagnostic tests and the advanced molecular tests that are currently available to diagnose the primary MDR pathogens and the resistance genes causing pneumonia.

Effect of antibiotic therapy on the prognosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is poorly described in the literature. However, it has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Probabilistic antibiotic therapy against S. maltophilia is often ineffective as this pathogen is resistant to many antibiotics. There is no consensus at present on the best therapeutic strategy to adopt (class of antibiotics, antibiotic combination, dosage, treatment duration). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of antibiotic therapy strategy on the prognosis of patients with VAP caused by S. maltophilia.

RESULTS

This retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who developed VAP caused by S. maltophilia between 2010 and 2018 while hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a French university hospital in Reunion Island, in the Indian Ocean region. A total of 130 patients with a median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II of 58 [43-73] had VAP caused by S. maltophilia after a median duration of mechanical ventilation of 12 [5-18] days. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was polymicrobial in 44.6% of cases, and ICU mortality was 50.0%. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, the factors associated with increased ICU mortality were older age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p = 0.001) and high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on the day of VAP onset (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.14, p = 0.002). Appropriate antibiotic therapy, and in particular trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, was associated with decreased ICU mortality (HR: 0.42; 95% CI 0.24-0.74, p = 0.003) and decreased hospital mortality (HR: 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.79, p = 0.04). Time to start of appropriate antibiotic therapy, combination therapy, and duration of appropriate antibiotic therapy had no effect on ICU mortality (p > 0.5).

CONCLUSION

In our study, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and in particular trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, was associated with decreased ICU and hospital mortality in patients with VAP caused by S. maltophilia.

Clinical outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The historical treatment of choice for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection is trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and this is primarily based on preclinical studies. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of patients receiving monotherapy with different agents.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients receiving monotherapy for S. maltophilia infection with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), a fluoroquinolone, or minocycline from 2010 to 2016. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of recurrence, alteration of therapy due to adverse reaction or concern for clinical failure, or 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. To account for treatment selection bias, multivariate regression and propensity score weighting were conducted.

RESULTS

284 patients were included (217 received TMP/SMX, 28 received a fluoroquinolone, and 39 received minocycline). The TMP/SMX and minocycline groups appeared to include similar patients whereas the fluoroquinolone group appeared to represent a slightly less severely ill population. Clinical failure was similar between groups (36%, 29%, and 31% in the TMP/SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups, respectively, P=0.69) as was 30-day mortality (15%, 7%, and 5% in the TMP/SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups, respectively, P=0.16). After controlling for confounding factors, receipt of minocycline (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.2 [0.1-0.7]) but not a fluoroquinolone (adjusted OR=0.3 [0.1 to 2.1]) was associated with lower mortality compared with TMP/SMX. This association persisted after propensity score weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes were similar or better with alternatives to TMP/SMX monotherapy, which indicates this may not be the treatment of choice for infections caused by S. maltophilia.

Advances in the Microbiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen of significant concern to susceptible patient populations. This pathogen can cause nosocomial and community-acquired respiratory and bloodstream infections and various other infections in humans. Sources include water, plant rhizospheres, animals, and foods. Studies of the genetic heterogeneity of S. maltophilia strains have identified several new genogroups and suggested adaptation of this pathogen to its habitats. The mechanisms used by S. maltophilia during pathogenesis continue to be uncovered and explored. S. maltophilia virulence factors include use of motility, biofilm formation, iron acquisition mechanisms, outer membrane components, protein secretion systems, extracellular enzymes, and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. S. maltophilia is intrinsically drug resistant to an array of different antibiotics and uses a broad arsenal to protect itself against antimicrobials. Surveillance studies have recorded increases in drug resistance for S. maltophilia, prompting new strategies to be developed against this opportunist. The interactions of this environmental bacterium with other microorganisms are being elucidated. S. maltophilia and its products have applications in biotechnology, including agriculture, biocontrol, and bioremediation.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Clinical Characteristics and Factors Associated with Mortality of Hospitalized Patients

Purpose

To study the clinical characteristics and factors associated with mortality of patients who had Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study to determine the clinical characteristics and factors associated with mortality for S. maltophilia infections among hospitalized adult patients at Siriraj Hospital. The clinical and microbiological data were collected from medical records December 2013–December 2016.

Results

Of 1221 subjects whose clinical samples grew S. maltophilia, 213 were randomly selected for chart review. One hundred patients with a true infection were analyzed. Their median age was 66 years; 47 were males; 46 were critically ill with a median APACHE II score of 18 (2–32); and 91 received antibiotic treatment, mainly with carbapenems (56%), before being diagnosed with a S. maltophilia infection. Pulmonary (53%) and bloodstream infections (25%) were the most common infections. The median length of hospitalization was 19 days before infection onset. The in-hospital mortality rate was 54%. The following factors were associated with mortality: a pre-existing respiratory infection (OR 6.28, 1.33–29.78; p.021); critical illness (OR 3.33, 1.45–7.62; p.005); multi-organ dysfunction (OR 2.44, 1.05–5.70; p.039); being on mechanical ventilation (OR 4.44, 1.90–10.39; p.001); concurrent immunosuppressive therapy (OR 2.67, 1.10–6.47; p.029); intravascular (OR 4.43, 1.79–10.92; p.001) and urinary catheterization (OR 4.83, 1.87–12.47; p.001); and serum albumin <3 g/dL (OR 4.13, 1.05–16.33; p.043). A multivariate analysis identified two independent factors associated with mortality: being on mechanical ventilation (OR 4.43, 1.86–10.59; p 0.001) and receiving concurrent immunosuppressive therapy (OR 2.26, 1.04–6.82; p 0.042).

Conclusion

S. maltophilia can cause nosocomial infections with high mortality, particularly in patients with a prolonged hospitalization. Concurrent immunosuppressive therapy and being on mechanical ventilation are the independent factors associated with a fatal outcome.

Outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia in intensive care unit: a nationwide retrospective study

Background

There is little descriptive data on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients. The optimal modalities of antimicrobial therapy remain to be determined. Our objective was to describe the epidemiology and prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia, focusing on antimicrobial therapy.

Methods

This nationwide retrospective study included all patients admitted to 25 French mixed intensive care units between 2012 and 2017 with hospital-acquired S. maltophilia HAP during intensive care unit stay. Primary endpoint was time to in-hospital death. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic effectiveness and antimicrobial therapeutic modalities such as delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment, mono versus combination therapy, and duration of antimicrobial therapy.

Results

Of the 282 patients included, 84% were intubated at S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis for duration of 11 [5–18] days. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 47 [36–63], and the in-hospital mortality was 49.7%. Underlying chronic pulmonary comorbidities were present in 14.1% of cases. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was considered effective on S. maltophilia according to susceptibility patterns in only 30% of cases. Delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment had, however, no significant impact on the primary endpoint. Survival analysis did not show any benefit from combination antimicrobial therapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CI [0.88; 1.83], p = 0.20) or prolonged antimicrobial therapy for more than 7 days (HR = 1.06, 95%CI [0.6; 1.86], p = 0.84). No differences were noted in in-hospital death irrespective of an appropriate and timely empiric antimicrobial therapy between mono- versus polymicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.273). The duration of ventilation prior to S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis and ICU length of stay were shorter in patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.031 and p = 0.034 respectively).

Conclusions

S. maltophilia HAP occurred in severe, long-stay intensive care patients who mainly required prolonged invasive ventilation. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was barely effective while antimicrobial treatment modalities had no significant impact on hospital survival.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03506191

Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Respiratory Tract Samples: A 10-Year Epidemiological Snapshot

Background:

Since the 1980s, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as an important pathogen associated with significant mortality in pneumonia and bacteremia of severely immunocompromised, hospitalized patients. The drug of choice in S maltophilia infections is sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX/TMP); SMX/TMP resistance is a serious concern in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of S maltophilia in lower respiratory tract (LRTI) samples at a tertiary-care university hospital.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study was carried out using microbiological data collected between January 2008 and December 2017. Routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for SMX/TMP and levofloxacin; in case of resistance, susceptibility testing for additional antibiotics (tigecycline, amikacin, and colistin) was also performed.

Results:

A total of 579 individual S maltophilia isolates were identified (2008-2012: n = 160, 2013-2017: n = 419; P = .0008). In all, 78.46% of patients were younger than 5 or older than 50 years of age and had recent trauma, surgery, or underlying conditions (malignancies, respiratory distress syndrome, congenital disorders, and cystic fibrosis). In 28.16% of samples, more than 1 pathogen was identified, and 5.35% of coisolated pathogens were multidrug resistant (MDR). In all, 12.1% of isolates were SMX/TMP-resistant (2008-2012: 6.12%, 2013-2017: 18.06%; P = .034), while 8.99% were resistant to levofloxacin (2008-2012: 7.86%, 2013-2017: 10.12%; P > .05). SMX/TMP resistance was detected more frequently in samples originating from inpatients (n = 2.50 ± 2.39 vs n = 11.50 ± 3.76; P = .0002).

Conclusions:

In all, 5.87% of isolates were extensively drug resistant (XDR), that is, in addition to SMX/TMP, they were resistant to levofloxacin, amikacin, colistin, and tigecycline. The results of our study correspond to the findings in the literature.

Treatment Outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Experience

OBJECTIVES

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a gram-negative opportunistic bacterium that may cause a myriad of clinical diseases in immunocompromised individuals. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, risk factors, mortality, and treatment of S. maltophilia bacteremia in critically ill children, a topic on which data are sparse.

DESIGN

A multicenter observational retrospective study in which medical charts of critically ill children with S. maltophilia bacteremia were reviewed between 2012 and 2017.

SETTING

Data were collected from each of the four largest PICUs nationwide, allocated in tertiary medical centers to which children with complex conditions are referred regularly.

PATIENTS

A total of 68 suitable cases of S. maltophilia bacteremia were retrieved and reviewed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The total occurrence rate of S. maltophilia isolation had increased significantly during the study period (r = 0.65; p = 0.02). The crude mortality was 42%, and the attributed mortality was 18%. Significant risk factors for mortality were a longer length of hospital stay prior to infection (33 d in nonsurvivors vs 28 in survivors; p = 0.03), a nosocomial source of infection (p = 0.02), presentation with septic shock (p < 0.001), and treatment with chemotherapy (p = 0.007) or carbapenem antibiotics (p = 0.05) prior to culture retrieval. On multivariate analysis, septic shock (odds ratio, 14.6; 95% CI, 1.45-147.05; p = 0.023) and being treated with chemotherapy prior to infection (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.59-17.19; p = 0.006)] were associated with mortality. The combination of ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and minocycline resulted in the longest survival time (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The significant attributed mortality associated with S. maltophilia bacteremia in critically ill children calls for an aggressive therapeutic approach. The findings of this investigation favor a combination of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline.

Is hospital-acquired pneumonia different in transplant recipients?

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are serious complications in transplant patients. The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence regarding nosocomial pneumonia in transplant recipients, including HAP in non-ventilated patients and VAP, and to identify future directions for improvement.A comprehensive literature search in the PubMed/MEDLINE database was performed. Articles written in English and published between 1990 and November 2018 were included. HAP/VAP in transplant patients usually occurs early post-transplant, particularly during neutropenia in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bacteria are the leading cause of nosocomial pneumonia for both immunocompetent and transplant recipients, being Gram negative organisms, and especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, highly prevalent. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are of special concern. Pneumonia in the transplant setting may be caused by opportunistic pathogens, and the differential diagnosis needs to be extended to other non-infectious complications. The most relevant opportunistic pathogens are Aspergillus fumigatus, Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus. Nevertheless, they are an exceptional cause of nosocomial pneumonia, and usually occur in severely immunosuppressed patients not receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis. Performing bronchoalveolar lavage may improve the rate of aetiological diagnosis, leading to a change in therapeutic management and improved outcomes. The optimal length of antibiotic therapy for bacterial HAP/VAP has not been well defined, but it should perhaps be longer than in the general population. Mortality associated with HAP/VAP is high. HAP/VAP in transplant patients is frequent and is associated with increased mortality. There is room for improvement in gaining knowledge about the management of HAP/VAP in this population.

Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolones are a popular alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on mortality of S. maltophilia infections.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Clinical studies reporting mortality outcomes of S. maltophilia infections.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with clinical infections caused by S. maltophilia.

INTERVENTIONS

Fluoroquinolone monotherapy in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy.

METHODS

Systematic review with meta-analysis technique.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective cohort and seven case-control studies were included. Three cohort studies were designed to compare the two drugs, whereas others had other purposes. A total of 663 patients were identified, 332 of which were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (50.1%) and 331 with fluoroquinolones (49.9%). Three cohort studies were designed to compare the effect of the two drugs, whereas the others had other purposes. Levofloxacin was most frequently used among fluoroquinolones (187/331, 56.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin (114/331, 34.4%). The overall mortality rate was 29.6%. Using pooled ORs for the mortality of each study, fluoroquinolone treatment (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99) was associated with survival benefit over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, with low heterogeneity (I² = 18%). Specific fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-1.12) and levofloxacin (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.26) did not show a significant difference in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In the sub-group analyses of adult and bacteraemic patients, significant differences in mortality were not observed between fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies, fluoroquinolones demonstrated comparable effects on mortality of S. maltophilia infection to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting the use of fluoroquinolones in clinical S. maltophilia infections. Although the pooled analysis of overall studies favoured fluoroquinolones over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the studies included were observational, and sub-group analyses of certain fluoroquinolone agents did not show statistical differences with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Randomized clinical studies are needed to address these issues.

Management of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections in Critically Ill Children

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a life-threatening nosocomial pathogen with profound multidrug-resistant attributes. It is associated with high mortality, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Data on therapy for S. maltophilia infections are scarce, especially in children hospitalized in intensive care settings (pediatric intensive care unit).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients with isolates of S. maltophilia hospitalized over a 5-year period in 2 pediatric intensive care units.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients and 91 isolates from blood, respiratory secretions and soft tissues were identified and reviewed. The overall incidence of S. maltophilia infections increased during the study period (P = 0.003). The all-cause crude mortality was 61%, and the attributed mortality was approximately 16%. Risk factors associated with mortality included longer hospitalization before infection (P = 0.002), septic shock (P = 0.003), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.004), an indwelling central vein catheter (P = 0.03) and prior use of steroids (P = 0.04) and carbapenems (P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, mortality was associated with mechanical ventilation (P = 0.02) and preinfection hospitalization days (P = 0.01). Combination treatment of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and/or minocycline significantly extended survival time (P < 0.001). The method of treatment did not significantly affect the interval between S. maltophilia isolation to resolution of infection (P = 0.200).

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and minocycline are proposed for pediatric intensive care unit patients harboring S. maltophilia. Meticulous evaluation of central vascular access and prior treatment with carbapenems are indicated, especially for mechanically ventilated and septic children.

Monotherapy with minocycline or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections

OBJECTIVES

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative bacillus intermittently isolated from hospitalized patients. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is considered the treatment of choice for S. maltophilia infections, though limited by toxicities. Minocycline is utilized at our institution for S. maltophilia infections due to its improved tolerability and in vitro susceptibility rates. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of minocycline monotherapy compared with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy for treatment of S. maltophilia infections.

METHODS

Patients were identified via microbiology laboratory data and those with at least one positive culture for S. maltophilia were cross-referenced with pharmacy data to detect patients who received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or minocycline. Patients initially receiving combination therapy were excluded. Our primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as receipt of alternative antibiotics with in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, isolation of S. maltophilia on repeat culture or death within 30 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were evaluated. Overall mortality rate was 9% and equal between groups; 41% of patients (9/22) who received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and 30% (7/23) of patients who received minocycline experienced treatment failure (P = 0.67). Patients who received minocycline were more likely to have had a recent acute kidney injury (AKI) (43.5% versus 9%; P = 0.017) or chronic lung disease (52% versus 9%; P = 0.003). Logistic regression showed consistent results of non-inferiority of the primary outcome when controlling for rates of underlying lung pathology and recent AKI (P = 0.728).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment failure did not differ between patients receiving trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or minocycline monotherapy for treatment of S. maltophilia infections.

Alterations of lung microbiota in a mouse model of LPS-induced lung injury

Acute lung injury (ALI) and the more severe acute respiratory distress syndrome are common responses to a variety of infectious and noninfectious insults. We used a mouse model of ALI induced by intratracheal administration of sterile bacterial wall lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to investigate the changes in innate lung microbiota and study microbial community reaction to lung inflammation and barrier dysfunction induced by endotoxin insult. One group of C57BL/6J mice received LPS via intratracheal injection (n = 6), and another received sterile water (n = 7). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed at 72 h after treatment. Bacterial DNA was extracted and used for qPCR and 16S rRNA gene-tag (V3-V4) sequencing (Illumina). The bacterial load in BAL from ALI mice was increased fivefold (P = 0.03). The community complexity remained unchanged (Simpson index, P = 0.7); the Shannon diversity index indicated the increase of community evenness in response to ALI (P = 0.07). Principal coordinate analysis and analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) test (P = 0.005) revealed a significant difference between microbiota of control and ALI groups. Bacteria from families Xanthomonadaceae and Brucellaceae increased their abundance in the ALI group as determined by Metastats test (P < 0.02). In concordance with the 16s-tag data, Stenotrohomonas maltophilia (Xanthomonadaceae) and Ochrobactrum anthropi (Brucellaceae) were isolated from lungs of mice from both groups. Metabolic profiling of BAL detected the presence of bacterial substrates suitable for both isolates. Additionally, microbiota from LPS-treated mice intensified IL-6-induced lung inflammation in naive mice. We conclude that the morbid transformation of ALI microbiota was attributed to the set of inborn opportunistic pathogens thriving in the environment of inflamed lung, rather than the external infectious agents.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection among young children in a cardiac intensive care unit: a single institution experience

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia can present as bacteremia, respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, soft tissue and wound infections, bone and joint infections, meningitis, and endocarditis especially in immunosuppressed patients and those with underlying medical conditions. The incidence and impact of S. maltophilia in young children with heart disease are poorly defined. A single center retrospective observational study was conducted in infants <180 days of age with positive S. maltophilia cultures over a period of 5 years. The overall incidence for S. maltophilia infection was 0.8 % (n = 32/3656). Among 32 identified infants, there were 47 episodes of S. maltophilia infection 66 % of infants had prior exposure to broad spectrum antibiotics. 97 % of positive isolates were susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and 91 % to levofloxacin as well as ticarcillin/clavulanate. Ventilator-free days and absolute lymphocyte count prior to acquiring infection were significantly lower in non-survivors than in survivors. 100 % of survivors had clearance of positive cultures compared to 50 % in non-survivors (p < 0.05). The crude all-cause mortality rate was 37.5 %. All non-survivors had increased length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation and had delayed clearance of infection and required longer duration of treatment.

Smqnr variants in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Brazil

SUMMARY

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia contains a novel chromosomally-encoded qnr gene named Smqnr that contributes to low intrinsic resistance to quinolone. We described Smqnr in 13 clinical isolates of S. maltophilia from two Brazilian hospitals, over a 2-year period. The strains were identified by API 20 NE (bioMérieux, France). Susceptibility by microdilution method to trimetroprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, minocycline, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol and ticarcillin/clavulanate was performed according to CLSI. PCR detection of Smqnr gene was carried out. The sequence of Smqnr was compared with those deposited in GenBank. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of all strains was performed. Thirteen Smqnr positives isolates were sequenced and three novel variants of Smqnr were identified. All 13 Smqnr isolates had distinguishable patterns by PFGE. This is the first report of Smqnr in S. maltophilia isolated in Brazil.

[Lower respiratory tract infections related to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii]

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii are both non-fermenting ubiquitous Gram-negative bacilli. The incidence of lower respiratory tract infections related to these microorganisms is increasing, especially in intensive care units. Their capacity to acquire resistance against several antimicrobials is challenging for clinicians and microbiologists. Despite their low virulence, these pathogens are responsible for colonization and infection in patients with comorbidities, immunosuppression, and critically ill patients. S. maltophilia and A. baumannii are mainly identified in nosocomial infections: ventilator-associated pneumonia, bacteremia and surgical wound infection. Infections related to these microorganism are associated with high mortality and morbidity. Trimethoprime-sulfamethoxazole and carbapenem are the first line treatment for infections related to S. maltophilia and A. baumannii respectively. However, the increasing rate of resistance against these agents results in difficulties in treating patients with infections related to these pathogens. New antimicrobial agents and further randomized studies are needed to improve the treatment of these infections. Prevention of spared of these multidrug-resistant bacteria is mandatory, including hand-hygiene, environment cleaning, and limited usage of large spectrum antibiotics.