1
|
Kostouraki A, Hajage D, Rachet B, Williamson EJ, Chauvet G, Belot A, Leyrat C. On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights. Stat Med 2024. [PMID: 38622063 DOI: 10.1002/sim.10078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Propensity score methods, such as inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW), have been increasingly used for covariate balancing in both observational studies and randomized trials, allowing the control of both systematic and chance imbalances. Approaches using IPTW are based on two steps: (i) estimation of the individual propensity scores (PS), and (ii) estimation of the treatment effect by applying PS weights. Thus, a variance estimator that accounts for both steps is crucial for correct inference. Using a variance estimator which ignores the first step leads to overestimated variance when the estimand is the average treatment effect (ATE), and to under or overestimated estimates when targeting the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). In this article, we emphasize the importance of using an IPTW variance estimator that correctly considers the uncertainty in PS estimation. We present a comprehensive tutorial to obtain unbiased variance estimates, by proposing and applying a unifying formula for different types of PS weights (ATE, ATT, matching and overlap weights). This can be derived either via the linearization approach or M-estimation. Extensive R code is provided along with the corresponding large-sample theory. We perform simulation studies to illustrate the behavior of the estimators under different treatment and outcome prevalences and demonstrate appropriate behavior of the analytical variance estimator. We also use a reproducible analysis of observational lung cancer data as an illustrative example, estimating the effect of receiving a PET-CT scan on the receipt of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andriana Kostouraki
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - David Hajage
- Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1901, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Bernard Rachet
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth J Williamson
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Aurélien Belot
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Clémence Leyrat
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmidt M, Hajage D, Combes A. ECMO and Prone Position in Patients With Severe ARDS-Reply. JAMA 2024; 331:1233. [PMID: 38592391 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.1876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kedra J, Dieudé P, Giboin C, Marotte H, Salliot C, Schaeverbeke T, Perdriger A, Soubrier M, Morel J, Constantin A, Dernis E, Royant V, Salmon JH, Pham T, Gottenberg JE, Pertuiset E, Dougados M, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Gaudin P, Cormier G, Goupille P, Mariette X, Berenbaum F, Alcaix D, Rouidi SA, Berthelot JM, Monnier A, Piroth C, Lioté F, Goëb V, Gaujoux-Viala C, Chary-Valckenaere I, Hajage D, Tubach F, Fautrel B. Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose: Results From a Multicenter Noninferiority Randomized Open-Label Controlled Trial Assessing Tocilizumab or Abatacept Injection Spacing in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission. Arthritis Rheumatol 2024; 76:541-552. [PMID: 37942714 DOI: 10.1002/art.42752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assess the clinical and structural impact at two years of progressively spacing tocilizumab (TCZ) or abatacept (ABA) injections versus maintenance at full dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission. METHODS This multicenter open-label noninferiority (NI) randomized clinical trial included patients with established rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission receiving ABA or TCZ at a stable dose. Patients were randomized to treatment maintenance (M) at full dose (M-arm) or progressive injection spacing (S) driven by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints every 3 months up to biologics discontinuation (S-arm). The primary end point was the evolution of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score in 44 joints during the 2-year follow-up analyzed per protocol with a linear mixed-effects model, evaluated by an NI test based on the one-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the slope difference (NI margin 0.25). Other end points were flare incidence and structural damage progression. RESULTS Overall, 202 of the 233 patients included were considered for per protocol analysis (90 in S-arm and 112 in M-arm). At the end of follow-up, 16.2% of the patients in the S-arm could discontinue their biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, 46.9% tapered the dose and 36.9% returned to a full dose. NI was not demonstrated for the primary outcome, with a slope difference of 0.10 (95% CI 0.10-0.31) between the two arms. NI was not demonstrated for flare incidence (difference 42.6%, 95% CI 30.0-55.1) or rate of structural damage progression at two years (difference 13.9%, 95% CI -6.7 to 34.4). CONCLUSION The Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose trial failed to demonstrate NI for the proposed ABA or TCZ tapering strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Kedra
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Dieudé
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM UMR 1152 and Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Giboin
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Hubert Marotte
- Université Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, Saint-Étienne, France
| | | | | | | | - Martin Soubrier
- Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jacques Morel
- Montpellier University Hospital and University of Montpellier, INSRM, CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | - Arnaud Constantin
- Pierre-Paul Riquet University Hospital, Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier University, and INSERM UMR 1291, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Hugues Salmon
- University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Faculty of Medicine, UR 3797 and Maison Blanche Hospital, Reims University Hospitals, Reims, France
| | - Thao Pham
- Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Maxime Dougados
- University of Paris, Hôpital Cochin. AP-HP, INSERM U1153, pôle de recherche et d'enseignement supérieur Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Xavier Mariette
- Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, INSERM UMR1184, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Francis Berenbaum
- Sorbonne University-INSERM Centre De Recherche scientifique Saint-Antoine, AP-HP Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Frédéric Lioté
- Université de Paris and INSERM UMR1132 Bioscar (Centre Viggo Petersen), Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Goëb
- University Hospital of Amiens, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Cécile Gaujoux-Viala
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, University of Montpellier, INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Montpellier, France
| | | | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rambaud T, Hajage D, Dreyfuss D, Lebbah S, Martin-Lefevre L, Louis G, Moschietto S, Titeca-Beauport D, La Combe B, Pons B, De Prost N, Besset S, Combes A, Robine A, Beuzelin M, Badie J, Chevrel G, Bohe J, Coupez E, Chudeau N, Barbar S, Vinsonneau C, Forel JM, Thevenin D, Boulet E, Lakhal K, Aissaoui N, Grange S, Leone M, Lacave G, Nseir S, Poirson F, Mayaux J, Ashenoune K, Geri G, Klouche K, Thiery G, Argaud L, Rozec B, Cadoz C, Andreu P, Reignier J, Ricard JD, Quenot JP, Sonneville R, Gaudry S. Renal replacement therapy initiation strategies in comatose patients with severe acute kidney injury: a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:385-394. [PMID: 38407824 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07339-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The effect of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in comatose patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear. We compared two RRT initiation strategies on the probability of awakening in comatose patients with severe AKI. METHODS We conducted a post hoc analysis of a trial comparing two delayed RRT initiation strategies in patients with severe AKI. Patients were monitored until they had oliguria for more than 72 h and/or blood urea nitrogen higher than 112 mg/dL and then randomized to a delayed strategy (RRT initiated after randomization) or a more-delayed one (RRT initiated if complication occurred or when blood urea nitrogen exceeded 140 mg/dL). We included only comatose patients (Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale [RASS] < - 3), irrespective of sedation, at randomization. A multi-state model was built, defining five mutually exclusive states: death, coma (RASS < - 3), incomplete awakening (RASS [- 3; - 2]), awakening (RASS [- 1; + 1] two consecutive days), and agitation (RASS > + 1). Primary outcome was the transition from coma to awakening during 28 days after randomization. RESULTS A total of 168 comatose patients (90 delayed and 78 more-delayed) underwent randomization. The transition intensity from coma to awakening was lower in the more-delayed group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.36 [0.17-0.78]; p = 0.010). Time spent awake was 10.11 days [8.11-12.15] and 7.63 days [5.57-9.64] in the delayed and the more-delayed groups, respectively. Two sensitivity analyses were performed based on sedation status and sedation practices across centers, yielding comparable results. CONCLUSION In comatose patients with severe AKI, a more-delayed RRT initiation strategy resulted in a lower chance of transitioning from coma to awakening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Rambaud
- Département de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
- Département de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Neuro, APHP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Didier Dreyfuss
- Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France
| | - Saïd Lebbah
- Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | | | - Guillaume Louis
- Réanimation Polyvalente, CHR Metz-Thionville Hôpital de Mercy, Metz, France
| | | | | | | | - Bertrand Pons
- Réanimation, CHU Pointe-à-Pitre/Abymes, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | | | - Sébastien Besset
- Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Service de Réanimation Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Adrien Robine
- Réanimation Soins Continus, CH de Bourg-en-Bresse - Fleyriat, 01012, Bourg-en-Bresse, France
| | | | - Julio Badie
- Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comte CH Belfort, Belfort, France
| | - Guillaume Chevrel
- Réanimation Polyvalente, CH Sud Francilien, Corbeil Essonnes, France
| | - Julien Bohe
- Anesthésie Réanimation Médicale et Chirurgicale, CH Lyon Sud Pierre Benite, Lyon, France
| | - Elisabeth Coupez
- Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital G. Montpied, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Chudeau
- Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, CH du Mans, Le Mans, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric Boulet
- Réanimation et USC, GH Carnelle Portes de l'Oise, 95260, Beaumont Sur Oise, France
| | - Karim Lakhal
- Réanimation Chirurgicale Polyvalente, Hôpital Nord Laennec, Nantes, France
| | - Nadia Aissaoui
- Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | - Marc Leone
- Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Guillaume Lacave
- Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital André Mignot, Versailles, France
| | - Saad Nseir
- Réanimation Médicale, CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France
| | - Florent Poirson
- Département de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
| | - Julien Mayaux
- Pneumologie et Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Guillaume Geri
- Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Kada Klouche
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation,, Hôpital Lapeyronnie, Montpellier, France
| | - Guillaume Thiery
- Réanimation Médicale, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Laurent Argaud
- Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | | | - Cyril Cadoz
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Pascal Andreu
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
| | | | - Jean-Damien Ricard
- Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France
- Lipness Team, INSERM Research Center LNC-UMR1231 and LabExLipSTIC, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France
- NSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Romain Sonneville
- Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, AP-HP. Nord, Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1137, IAME, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Gaudry
- Département de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France.
- Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France.
- Health Care Simulation Center, UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France.
- Investigation Network Initiative-Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists, Bobigny, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin GL, Petri C, Rozenberg J, Simon N, Hajage D, Kirchgesner J, Tubach F, Létinier L, Dechartres A. A methodological review of the high-dimensional propensity score in comparative-effectiveness and safety-of-interventions research finds incomplete reporting relative to algorithm development and robustness. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111305. [PMID: 38417583 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of secondary databases has become popular for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of interventions in real-life settings. However, the absence of important confounders in these databases is challenging. To address this issue, the high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) algorithm was developed in 2009. This algorithm uses proxy variables for mitigating confounding by combining information available across several healthcare dimensions. This study assessed the methodology and reporting of the hdPS in comparative effectiveness and safety research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In this methodological review, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar from July 2009 to May 2022 for studies that used the hdPS for evaluating the effectiveness or safety of healthcare interventions. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and assessed how the hdPS was applied and reported. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Rrisk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. RESULTS In total, 136 studies met the inclusion criteria; the median publication year was 2018 (Q1-Q3 2016-2020). The studies included 192 datasets, mostly North American databases (n = 132, 69%). The hdPS was used in primary analysis in 120 studies (88%). Dimensions were defined in 101 studies (74%), with a median of 5 (Q1-Q3 4-6) dimensions included. A median of 500 (Q1-Q3 200-500) empirically identified covariates were selected. Regarding hdPS reporting, only 11 studies (8%) reported all recommended items. Most studies (n = 81, 60%) had a moderate overall risk of bias. CONCLUSION There is room for improvement in the reporting of hdPS studies, especially regarding the transparency of methodological choices that underpin the construction of the hdPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Louis Martin
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France; Synapse Medicine, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Camille Petri
- UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in AI for Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Noémie Simon
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Julien Kirchgesner
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Département de Gastroentérologie et Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | | | - Agnès Dechartres
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Le Marec J, Hajage D, Decavèle M, Schmidt M, Laurent I, Ricard JD, Jaber S, Azoulay E, Fartoukh M, Hraiech S, Mercat A, Similowski T, Demoule A. High Airway Occlusion Pressure Is Associated with Dyspnea and Increased Mortality in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024. [PMID: 38319128 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202308-1358oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE 100 ms airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) reflects central respiratory drive. We aimed to assess factors associated with P0.1 and whether an abnormally low or high P0.1 value is associated with higher mortality and longer duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). METHODS Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study conducted in 10 intensive care units in France to evaluate dyspnea in communicative MV patients. In patients intubated for more than 24 hours, P0.1 was measured with dyspnea as soon as patients could communicate and the following day. RESULTS 260 patients were assessed after a median time of ventilation of 4 days. P0.1 was 1.9 (1 - 3.5) cmH2O on enrollment, 24% had a P0.1 >3.5 cmH2O, 37% had a P0.1 between 1.5 and 3.5 cmH2O, and 39% had a P0.1 <1.5 cmH2O. In multivariable linear regression, independent factors associated with P0.1 level were presence of dyspnea (p=0.037), respiratory rate (p<0.001), and PaO2 (p=0.008). 90-day mortality was 33% in patients with P0.1 >3.5 cmH2O vs. 19% in those with a P0.1 between 1.5 and 3.5 cmH2O and 17% in patients with P0.1 <1.5 cmH2O (p=0.046). After adjustment for the main risk factors, P0.1 was associated with 90-day mortality (per cmH2O of P0.1, Hazard ratio 1.19, 95% Confidence interval 1.04 - 1.37, p=0.011). P0.1 was also independently associated with a longer duration of MV (per cmH2O of P0.1, Hazard ratio 1.10, 95% Confidence interval 1.02-1.19, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, abnormally high P0.1 values may suggest dyspnea and is associated with higher mortality and prolonged duration of MV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Le Marec
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Service Médecine Intensive - Réanimation - R3S, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, 26933, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Maxens Decavèle
- Groupe Hospitalier La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, 55577, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Matthieu Schmidt
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de réanimation médicale, Paris, France
| | - Isaura Laurent
- Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, 26933, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France
| | | | - Samir Jaber
- University hospital. CHU de MONTPELLIER HOPITAL SAINT ELOI, Intensive Care Unit and transplantation-Departement of Anesthesiology DAR B, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | | | - Muriel Fartoukh
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Médecine intensive Réanimatio, Paris, Île-de-France, France
- Paris, France
| | - Sami Hraiech
- Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, URMITE UMR CNRS 7278, Hôpital Nord, Réanimation des Détresses Respiratoires et Infections Sévères, Marseille, France , Marseille, France
| | - Alain Mercat
- Angers University Hospital, Departement de Reanimation medicale et medecine hyperbare, Angers, France
| | - Thomas Similowski
- groupe hospitalier pitié-salpêtrière, service de pneumologie, PARIS, France
| | - Alexandre Demoule
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmidt M, Hajage D, Lebreton G, Dres M, Guervilly C, Richard JC, Sonneville R, Winiszewski H, Muller G, Beduneau G, Mercier E, Roze H, Lesouhaitier M, Terzi N, Thille AW, Laurent I, Kimmoun A, Combes A. Prone Positioning During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Severe ARDS: The PRONECMO Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 330:2343-2353. [PMID: 38038395 PMCID: PMC10692949 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.24491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Importance Prone positioning may improve outcomes in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but it is unknown whether prone positioning improves clinical outcomes among patients with ARDS who are undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) compared with supine positioning. Objective To test whether prone positioning vs supine positioning decreases the time to successful ECMO weaning in patients with severe ARDS supported by VV-ECMO. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized clinical trial of patients with severe ARDS undergoing VV-ECMO for less than 48 hours at 14 intensive care units (ICUs) in France between March 3, 2021, and December 7, 2021. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to prone positioning (at least 4 sessions of 16 hours) (n = 86) or to supine positioning (n = 84). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to successful ECMO weaning within 60 days following randomization. Secondary outcomes included ECMO and mechanical ventilation-free days, ICU and hospital length of stay, skin pressure injury, serious adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 90-day follow-up. Results Among 170 randomized patients (median age, 51 [IQR, 43-59] years; n = 60 women [35%]), median respiratory system compliance was 15.0 (IQR, 10.7-20.6) mL/cm H2O; 159 patients (94%) had COVID-19-related ARDS; and 164 (96%) were in prone position before ECMO initiation. Within 60 days of enrollment, 38 of 86 patients (44%) had successful ECMO weaning in the prone ECMO group compared with 37 of 84 (44%) in the supine ECMO group (risk difference, 0.1% [95% CI, -14.9% to 15.2%]; subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.71-1.75]; P = .64). Within 90 days, no significant difference was observed in ECMO duration (28 vs 32 days; difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -11.2 to 1.5] days; P = .13), ICU length of stay, or 90-day mortality (51% vs 48%; risk difference, 2.4% [95% CI, -13.9% to 18.6%]; P = .62). No serious adverse events were reported during the prone position procedure. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with severe ARDS supported by VV-ECMO, prone positioning compared with supine positioning did not significantly reduce time to successful weaning of ECMO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04607551.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Schmidt
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- GRC 30 RESPIRE, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière–Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1421, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris France
| | - Martin Dres
- GRC 30 RESPIRE, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation (Département R3S), et Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS-1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Guervilly
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches sur les Services de Santé et Qualité de Vie EA 3279, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Christophe Richard
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Sonneville
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1137, F-75018 Paris, APHP Nord, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Bichat–Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | | | - Gregoire Muller
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional d’Orléans, Orléans, France
| | - Gaëtan Beduneau
- Université Rouen Normandie, Normandie Université, GRHVN UR 3830, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Emmanuelle Mercier
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Tours, CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Network, Tours, France
| | - Hadrien Roze
- Service d’Anesthésie Réanimation Thoraco-Abdominale, CMC Magellan, Hôpital, Haut Leveque, CHU de Bordeaux, INSERM 1045: Centre de Recherche Cardio-Thoracique, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Mathieu Lesouhaitier
- CHU Rennes, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, Rennes, France
| | - Nicolas Terzi
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Université de Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm U1042, Grenoble, France
| | - Arnaud W. Thille
- CHU de Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France
| | - Isaura Laurent
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière–Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1421, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Kimmoun
- Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- GRC 30 RESPIRE, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Serret-Larmande A, Zenati B, Dechartres A, Lambert J, Hajage D. A methodological review of population-adjusted indirect comparisons reveals inconsistent reporting and suggests publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 163:1-10. [PMID: 37717707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Population-adjusted indirect comparisons (PAICs) were developed in the 2010s to allow for comparisons between two treatments evaluated in different trials while accounting for differences in patient characteristics if individual patient data (IPD) are available for only one trial. Such comparisons are increasingly used in market access applications when a pharmaceutical company compares its new treatment (with IPD available) to another treatment developed by a competitor (with only aggregated data available). This study aimed to describe the characteristics of these PAICs, assess their methodology, and describe the reported results. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Original articles reporting the use of at least one PAIC were searched on PubMed between January 1, 2010 and April 2, 2022. Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted data. RESULTS We included 133 publications reporting the results of 288 PAICs. Half of the articles were published on or after May 7, 2020, and 71 (53%) pertained to onco-hematology. The pharmaceutical industry was involved in 130 (98%) articles. Key methodological aspects were reported inconsistently, with only three articles adequately reporting all aspects. A total of 161 (56%) articles reported a statistically significant benefit for the treatment evaluated on IPD. Conversely, only one PAIC significantly favored the treatment evaluated on aggregated data. CONCLUSION Although the number of published PAICs is increasing, the methodology and transparency need to be improved. Moreover, our study strongly suggests a reporting bias. This situation calls for strengthening guidelines to improve trust in PAIC results and thus their reliability in market access applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Serret-Larmande
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; ECSTRRA Team UMR-1153 INSERM, AP-HP Saint Louis Hospital, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Belkacem Zenati
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Agnès Dechartres
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Lambert
- ECSTRRA Team UMR-1153 INSERM, AP-HP Saint Louis Hospital, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moysidou GS, Marotte H, Kossi S, Tubach F, Hajage D, Fautrel B. Ability to predict rheumatoid arthritis relapse after tumour necrosis factor inhibitor tapering by the Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity Score: a post-hoc analysis of the STRASS trial. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2023; 41:1831-1837. [PMID: 37497730 DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/eonoj3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was to evaluate the ability of baseline multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score to discriminate between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission who are at high risk versus low risk of relapse after TNF-inhibitor (TNFi) tapering. METHODS The study is a post-hoc analysis of patients who completed the Spacing of TNFi injections in Rheumatoid ArthritiS Study (STRASS), a multicentre 18-month equivalence randomised controlled study, of TNFi tapering in RA patients in remission, and had baseline serum samples available for MBDA testing. The primary endpoint of this study was the ability of the baseline MBDA score to predict relapse at any time during the 18 months following initiation of TNFi tapering. Secondary endpoints were the ability of baseline MBDA score to predict TNFi discontinuation at Month 18, and structural damage progression on x-rays assessed by the change in total van der Heijde-modified Sharp score from baseline to month 18. RESULTS 64 and 73 patients were included in the spacing (S)-arm and maintenance (M)-arm, respectively. In the M-arm, the mean MBDA score at baseline was higher among patients who relapsed during the 18-month follow-up than those who did not relapse: 32.5 compared to 27.2 (p=0.053) whereas no difference in the MBDA score was observed in the S-arm between patients who relapsed or not 27 compared to 26.2 (p=0.57) 13 patients (21.3%) of the S-arm were able to discontinue TNFi, for which the predictive value of the MBDA score was low (AUC=0.560). Radiographic progression in both arms, although low (n=9) was not correlated with the MBDA score at baseline with a poor discriminative value in both arms (AUC=0.558). CONCLUSIONS In our study MBDA score in baseline was not predictive of relapse, discontinuation of TNFi in patients with long-standing RA patients tapering TNFi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia-Savina Moysidou
- Department of Rheumatology, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Hubert Marotte
- Department of Rheumatology, Université St Etienne, and CRI-IMIDIATE Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Paris, France
| | - Sandra Kossi
- Department of Rheumatology, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- CRI-IMIDIATE Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Paris; INSERM UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, PEPITES Team, Paris, and Department of Biostatistics, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- INSERM UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, PEPITES Team, Paris, and Department of Biostatistics, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris; CRI-IMIDIATE Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Paris, and INSERM UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, PEPITES Team, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guérin E, Belin L, Franchineau G, Le Guennec L, Hajage D, Diallo MH, Frapard T, Le Fèvre L, Luyt CE, Combes A, Germain S, Hayon J, Asfar P, Bréchot N. FX06 to rescue SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Crit Care 2023; 27:331. [PMID: 37641136 PMCID: PMC10463389 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04616-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vascular leakage is a major feature of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FX06, a drug under development that stabilizes interendothelial cell junctions, at reducing vascular leakage during SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS. METHODS This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial included adults with COVID-19-associated ARDS who had received invasive mechanical ventilation for < 5 days and were randomized to receive either intravenous FX06 (400 mg/d, for 5 days) or its vehicle as placebo. The primary endpoint was the lowering-from day 1 to day 7-of the transpulmonary thermodilution-derived extravascular lung-water index (EVLWi). RESULTS Twenty-five patients were randomized to receive FX06 and 24 the placebo. Although EVLWi was elevated at baseline (median [IQR] 15.6 mL/kg [13.5; 18.5]), its declines from day 1 to day 7 were comparable for FX06 recipients and controls (respectively, - 1.9 [- 3.3; - 0.5] vs. - 0.8 [- 5.5; - 1.1] mL/kg; estimated effect - 0.8 [- 3.1; + 2.4], p = 0.51). Cardiac indexes, pulmonary vascular permeability indexes, and fluid balances were also comparable, as were PaO2/FiO2 ratios and durations of mechanical ventilation. Adverse event rates were similar for the 2 groups, although more FX06 recipients developed ventilator-associated pneumonia (16/25 (64%) vs. 6/24 (24%), p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS In this unique-dosing-regimen study, FX06 did not lower SARS-CoV-2-induced pulmonary vascular leakage. Future investigations will need to evaluate its efficacy at earlier times during the disease or using other regimens. Trial registration NCT04618042. Registered 5 November 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Guérin
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Lisa Belin
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d' Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Franchineau
- Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France
- INSERM U1018, Centre de Recherche en Épidémiologie Et Santé Des Populations (CESP), Equipe "Rein et Cœur", Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Loïc Le Guennec
- Médecine Intensive-Réanimation Neurologique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d' Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Mamadou Hassimiou Diallo
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d' Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Frapard
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Lucie Le Fèvre
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Germain
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Jan Hayon
- Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France
| | - Pierre Asfar
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation et Médecine Hyperbare, Centre Universitaire Hospitalier d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - Nicolas Bréchot
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université PSL, Paris, France.
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France.
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barraud D, Besançon L, Bik EM, Billy E, Clarot F, Frank F, Guihur A, Hajage D, Lacombe K, Maisonneuve H, Molimard M, Mulot M, Samuel A. Why the article that led to the widespread use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 should be retracted. Therapie 2023; 78:437-440. [PMID: 37321944 PMCID: PMC10236894 DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Barraud
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHR Metz-Thionville, 57530 Ars-Laquenexy, France.
| | - Lonni Besançon
- Media and Information Technology, Linköping University, 581 83 Norrköping, Sweden
| | | | | | - Franck Clarot
- Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, University Rouen, 76031 Rouen cedex, France
| | | | - Anthony Guihur
- Department of Plant Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David Hajage
- Inserm, département de santé publique, institut Pierre-Louis d'épidémiologie et de santé publique, centre de pharmacoépidémiologie, Sorbonne université, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75231 Paris, France
| | - Karine Lacombe
- IPLESP, Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, 75231 Paris, France
| | | | - Mathieu Molimard
- Service de pharmacologie CHU de Bordeaux, université de Bordeaux, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - Matthieu Mulot
- Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland; University of Neuchâtel, Hospital Network of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramdjee B, Husson M, Hajage D, Tubach F, Estellat C, Dechartres A. COVID-19 trials were not more likely to report intent to share individual data than non-COVID-19 trials in ClinicalTrials.gov. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 158:10-17. [PMID: 36965602 PMCID: PMC10036148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare intent to share individual participant data (IPD) between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov between 01/09/2020, and 01/03/2021. We also evaluated factors independently associated with intent to share IPD and whether intent to share IPD has improved as compared with the prepandemic period. METHODS We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for all interventional phase 3 studies registered between 01/09/2020, and 01/03/2021. Then, we identified COVID-19 trials and selected a random sample of non-COVID-19 trials with a ratio 2:1. We compared the intent to share IPD between these trials and with 292 trials registered between 01/12/2019, and 01/03/2020 (prepandemic period). RESULTS We included 148 COVID-19 trials and 296 non-COVID-19 trials. Intent to share IPD did not significantly differ between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 trials (22.3% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.3). Intent to share IPD was independently associated with industry-sponsorship (odds ratio [OR] = 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65-5.27) and location in the United States (OR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.64-5.41) or the European Union (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.03-4.19). The intent to share IPD has not significantly improved compared with the prepandemic period (P = 0.16). CONCLUSION Data-sharing intent at registration does not seem better for COVID-19 trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Ramdjee
- AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, F75013, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Husson
- AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, F75013, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, CIC-1901, F75013, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, CIC-1901, F75013, Paris, France
| | - Candice Estellat
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, CIC-1901, F75013, Paris, France
| | - Agnès Dechartres
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, CIC-1901, F75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Walter T, Hajage D, Ricard JD. Extended Prone Positioning Duration, But After How Many Sessions? Chest 2023; 163:e286-e287. [PMID: 37295889 PMCID: PMC10244863 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs Walter
- DMU ESPRIT, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique and AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France
| | - Jean-Damien Ricard
- DMU ESPRIT, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France; UMR1137 IAME, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Januel E, Hajage D, Labauge P, Maillart E, De Sèze J, Zephir H, Pelletier J, Guilloton L, Bensa C, Heinzlef O, Casez O, Biotti D, Bourre B, Vukusic S, Maurousset A, Berger E, Laplaud D, Lebrun-Frénay C, Dubessy AL, Branger P, Thouvenot E, Clavelou P, Sellal F, Manchon E, Moreau T, Papeix C, Tubach F, Louapre C. Association Between Anti-CD20 Therapies and COVID-19 Severity Among Patients With Relapsing-Remitting and Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2319766. [PMID: 37351881 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), factors associated with severe COVID-19 include anti-CD20 therapies and neurologic disability, but it is still unclear whether these 2 variables are independently associated with severe COVID-19 or whether the association depends on MS clinical course. Objective To assess the association between anti-CD20 therapies and COVID-19 severity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, retrospective cohort study used data from the COVISEP study, which included patients with MS and COVID-19 from February 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022, at 46 French MS expert centers, general hospitals, and private neurology practices. Eligible patients with RRMS were those treated with high-efficacy MS therapy (ie, anti-CD20, fingolimod, or natalizumab), and eligible patients with PMS were those younger than 70 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 8 or lower. Patients were monitored from COVID-19 symptom onset until recovery or death. Exposures Current anti-CD20 therapy (ocrelizumab or rituximab). Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization with any mode of oxygenation or death). All analyses were conducted separately in patients with RRMS and PMS using propensity score-weighted logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to COVID-19 vaccine status, sex, EDSS score, and age. Results A total of 1400 patients, 971 with RRMS (median age, 39.14 years [IQR, 31.38-46.80 years]; 737 [76.1%] female) and 429 with PMS (median age, 54.21 years [IQR, 48.42-60.14 years]; 250 [58.3%] female) were included in the study. A total of 418 patients with RRMS (43.0%) and 226 with PMS (52.7%) were treated with anti-CD20 therapies. In weighted analysis, 13.4% and 2.9% of patients with RRMS treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 5.20; 95% CI, 2.78-9.71); this association persisted among vaccinated patients (7.0% vs 0.9%; OR, 8.85; 95% CI, 1.26-62.12). Among patients with PMS, 19.0% and 15.5% of patients treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and there was no association between anti-CD20 treatment and severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.76-2.16). In PMS subgroup analysis, anti-CD20 exposure interacted negatively with EDSS score (P = .009 for interaction) and age (P = .03 for interaction); anti-CD20 therapies were associated with risk of severe COVID-19 only in patients with less neurologic disability and younger patients with PMS. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, risk of severe COVID-19 was higher in patients with PMS than in those with RRMS. Use of anti-CD20 therapies was associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 among patients with RRMS. In patients with PMS, there was no association between anti-CD20 therapies and risk of severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edouard Januel
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Clinical Investigation Center, Paris Brain Institute, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Labauge
- Department of Neurology, CRC-SEP, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France/Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, INSERM and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Elisabeth Maillart
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Clinical Investigation Center, Paris Brain Institute, Paris, France
| | - Jérome De Sèze
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Investigation Center, CHU de Strasbourg, CIC 1434, INSERM 1434, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hélène Zephir
- Department of Neurology, CHU Lille, INSERM U1172, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean Pelletier
- Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Guilloton
- Association des Neurologues Libéraux de Langue Française, Bergerac, France
| | - Caroline Bensa
- Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Heinzlef
- Département de Neurologie, CRC-SEP, Centre Hospitalier de Poissy-St Germain-en-Laye, France
| | - Olivier Casez
- Neurologie, Pathologies Inflammatoires du Système Nerveux, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France / Techniques de l'Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications, Grenoble, Translational Research in Autoimmunity and Inflammation Group, Université de Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Damien Biotti
- Centre Ressources et Compétences Sclérose en Plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France INSERM UMR1291-CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Sandra Vukusic
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Bron, France
| | - Aude Maurousset
- CRC-SEP and Department of Neurology, CHU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Eric Berger
- CHU de Besançon, Service de Neurologie, Besançon, France
| | - David Laplaud
- CHU de Nantes, Service de Neurologie & CIC015 INSERM, Nantes, France
| | | | - Anne-Laure Dubessy
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Department of Neurology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, CRC-SEP Paris, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Branger
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Eric Thouvenot
- Department of Neurology, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France
- Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, UMR5203, INSERM 1191, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Clavelou
- Department of Neurology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - François Sellal
- Département de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, Unité INSERM U-1118, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eric Manchon
- Department of Neurology, Gonesse Hospital, Gonesse, France
| | | | - Caroline Papeix
- Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Paris, France
| | - Céline Louapre
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Clinical Investigation Center, Paris Brain Institute, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roux D, Benichou N, Hajage D, Martin-Lefèvre L, de Prost N, Lerolle N, Titeca-Beauport D, Boulet E, Mayaux J, Mégarbane B, Mahjoub K, Carpentier D, Nseir S, Tubach F, Ricard JD, Dreyfuss D, Gaudry S. Impact of renal replacement therapy strategy on beta-lactam plasma concentrations: the BETAKIKI study-an ancillary study of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care 2023; 13:11. [PMID: 36840825 PMCID: PMC9968363 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-023-01105-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis prognosis correlates with antibiotic adequacy at the early phase. This adequacy is dependent on antibacterial spectrum, bacterial resistance profile and antibiotic dosage. Optimal efficacy of beta-lactams mandates concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the targeted bacteria for the longest time possible over the day. Septic acute kidney injury (AKI) is the most common AKI syndrome in ICU and often mandates renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation. Both severe AKI and RRT may increase outside target antibiotic concentrations and ultimately alter patient's prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial that compared an early RRT initiation strategy with a delayed one in 620 critically ill patients undergoing severe AKI (defined by KDIGO 3). We compared beta-lactam trough concentrations between the two RRT initiation strategies. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sufficient trough plasma concentration of beta-lactams defined by trough concentration above 4 times the MIC. We hypothesized that early initiation of RRT could be associated with an insufficient antibiotic plasma trough concentration compared to patients allocated to the delayed strategy. RESULTS One hundred and twelve patients were included: 53 in the early group and 59 in the delayed group. Eighty-three patients (74%) had septic shock on inclusion. Trough beta-lactam plasma concentration was above 4 times the MIC breakpoint in 80.4% (n = 90) of patients of the whole population, without differences between the early and the delayed groups (79.2% vs. 81.4%, respectively, p = 0.78). On multivariate analysis, the presence of septic shock and a higher mean arterial pressure were significantly associated with a greater probability of adequate antibiotic trough concentration [OR 3.95 (1.14;13.64), p = 0.029 and OR 1.05 (1.01;1.10), p = 0.013, respectively). Evolution of procalcitonin level and catecholamine-free days as well as mortality did not differ whether beta-lactam trough concentration was above 4 times the MIC or not. CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, renal replacement therapy initiation strategy did not significantly influence plasma trough concentrations of beta-lactams in ICU patients with severe AKI. Presence of septic shock on inclusion was the main variable associated with a sufficient beta-lactam concentration. TRIAL REGISTRATION The AKIKI trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01932190) before the inclusion of the first patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Roux
- DMU ESPRIT, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700, Colombes, France. .,Université Paris Cité, INSERM, CNRS, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, 75015, Paris, France.
| | - Nicolas Benichou
- grid.414205.60000 0001 0273 556XDMU ESPRIT, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700 Colombes, France ,grid.462844.80000 0001 2308 1657Sorbonne Université, INSERM Unit S_1155 CORAKID, 75010 Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Céphépi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CIC-1901 Paris, France
| | - Laurent Martin-Lefèvre
- Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Départemental - Site de La Roche-Sur-Yon, La Roche-sur-Yon, France ,grid.277151.70000 0004 0472 0371Organ Donation Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas de Prost
- grid.412116.10000 0004 1799 3934Réanimation Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France ,grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Groupe de Recherche CARMAS, Université Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, 27010 Créteil, France
| | - Nicolas Lerolle
- grid.411147.60000 0004 0472 0283Département de Réanimation Médicale et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU Angers, Université d’Angers, Angers, France
| | - Dimitri Titeca-Beauport
- grid.134996.00000 0004 0593 702XBoRealStudy Group, Medical Intensive Care Unit and EA7517, Amiens University Hospital, 80054 Amiens, France
| | - Eric Boulet
- Val d’Oise, Hôpital René Dubos, Pontoise, France
| | - Julien Mayaux
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Bruno Mégarbane
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Department of Medical and Toxicological Critical Care, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France ,INSERM, UMRS-1144, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Khaoula Mahjoub
- grid.413961.80000 0004 0443 544XService de Réanimation, Hôpital Delafontaine, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | - Dorothée Carpentier
- grid.41724.340000 0001 2296 5231Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Saad Nseir
- grid.503422.20000 0001 2242 6780Centre Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU de Lille and INSERM U1285, Université de Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576-UGSF, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Céphépi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CIC-1901 Paris, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Unité de Recherche Clinique, INSERM, UMR 1123, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Damien Ricard
- grid.414205.60000 0001 0273 556XDMU ESPRIT, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700 Colombes, France ,Université Paris Cité, UMR1137 IAME, INSERM, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Didier Dreyfuss
- grid.414205.60000 0001 0273 556XDMU ESPRIT, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700 Colombes, France ,grid.462844.80000 0001 2308 1657Sorbonne Université, INSERM Unit S_1155 CORAKID, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Gaudry
- grid.462844.80000 0001 2308 1657Sorbonne Université, INSERM Unit S_1155 CORAKID, 75010 Paris, France ,grid.413780.90000 0000 8715 2621Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, AP-HP, Hôpital Avicenne, 93000 Bobigny, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Massol J, Simon-Tillaux N, Tohme J, Hariri G, Dureau P, Duceau B, Belin L, Hajage D, De Rycke Y, Charfeddine A, Lebreton G, Combes A, Bouglé A. Levosimendan in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac surgery: an emulated target trial using observational data. Crit Care 2023; 27:51. [PMID: 36750852 PMCID: PMC9906922 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04328-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrospective cohorts have suggested that levosimendan may facilitate the weaning of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). We therefore studied this clinical question by emulating a randomized trial with observational data. METHODS All patients with refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and assisted with VA-ECMO, admitted to a surgical intensive care unit at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital between 2016 and 2019, were eligible. To avoid immortal-time bias, we emulated a target trial sequentially comparing levosimendan administration versus no levosimendan administration in patients treated with VA-ECMO. The primary outcome was time to successful ECMO weaning. The secondary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year mortality. We performed a multivariable analysis to adjust for confounding at baseline. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included in the study allowing building a nested trials cohort of 1434 copies of patients. No association of levosimendan treatment and VA-ECMO weaning was found (HR = 0.91, [0.57; 1.45], p = 0.659 in multivariable analysis), or 30-day mortality (OR = 1.03, [0.52; 2.03], p = 0.940) and 1-year mortality (OR = 1.00, [0.53; 1.89], p = 0.999). CONCLUSIONS Using the emulated target trial framework, this study did not find any association of levosimendan treatment and ECMO weaning success after postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. However, the population of interest remains heterogeneous and subgroups might benefit from levosimendan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Massol
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Noémie Simon-Tillaux
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Joanna Tohme
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Geoffroy Hariri
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Pauline Dureau
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Baptiste Duceau
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Lisa Belin
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Yann De Rycke
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Ahmed Charfeddine
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Alain Combes
- grid.411439.a0000 0001 2150 9058Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Adrien Bouglé
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schmidt M, Hajage D, Landoll M, Pequignot B, Langouet E, Amalric M, Mekontso-Dessap A, Chiscano-Camon L, Surman K, Finnerty D, Santa-Teresa P, Arcadipane A, Millán P, Roncon-Albuquerque R, Blandino-Ortiz A, Blanco-Schweizer P, Ricart P, Gimeno-Costa R, Albacete CL, Fortuna P, Schellongowski P, Dauwe D, Winiszewski H, Kimmoun A, Levy B, Hermans G, Grasselli G, Lebreton G, Guervilly C, Martucci G, Karagiannidis C, Riera J, Combes A. Comparative outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 delivered in experienced European centres during successive SARS-CoV-2 variant outbreaks (ECMO-SURGES): an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2023; 11:163-175. [PMID: 36640786 PMCID: PMC9889098 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00438-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To inform future research and practice, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to different variants of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received ECMO for ARDS in 21 experienced ECMO centres in eight European countries (Austria, Belgium, England, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain) between Jan 1, 2020, and Sept 30, 2021. We collected data on patient characteristics, clinical status, and management before and after the initiation of ECMO. Participants were grouped according to SARS-CoV-2 variant (wild type, alpha, delta, or other) and period of the pandemic (first [Jan 1-June 30] and second [July 1-Dec 31] semesters of 2020, and first [Jan 1-June 30] and second [July 1-Sept 30] semesters of 2021). Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyse evolving characteristics, management, and patient outcomes over the first 2 years of the pandemic, and independent risk factors of mortality were determined using multivariable Cox regression models. The primary outcome was mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO, with follow-up to Dec 30, 2021. FINDINGS ECMO was initiated in 1345 patients. Patient characteristics and management were similar for the groups of patients infected with different variants, except that those with the delta variant had a younger median age and less hypertension and diabetes. 90-day mortality was 42% (569 of 1345 patients died) overall, and 43% (297/686) in patients infected with wild-type SARS-CoV-2, 39% (152/391) in those with the alpha variant, 40% (78/195) in those with the delta variant, and 58% (42/73) in patients infected with other variants (mainly beta and gamma). Mortality was 10% higher (50%) in the second semester of 2020, when the wild-type variant was still prevailing, than in other semesters (40%). Independent predictors of mortality were age, immunocompromised status, a longer time from intensive care unit admission to intubation, need for renal replacement therapy, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment haemodynamic component score, partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, and lactate concentration before ECMO. After adjusting for these variables, mortality was significantly higher with the delta variant than with the other variants, the wild-type strain being the reference. INTERPRETATION Although crude mortality did not differ between variants, adjusted risk of death was highest for patients treated with ECMO infected with the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. The higher virulence and poorer outcomes associated with the delta strain might relate to higher viral load and increased inflammatory response syndrome in infected patients, reinforcing the need for a higher rate of vaccination in the population and updated selection criteria for ECMO, should a new and highly virulent strain of SARS-CoV-2 emerge in the future. Mortality was noticeably lower than in other large, multicentre series of patients who received ECMO for COVID-19, highlighting the need to concentrate resources at experienced centres. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Schmidt
- INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié–Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France
| | - Micha Landoll
- ARDS and ECMO Centre Cologne-Merheim, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany,Department of Cardiovascular Engineering, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pequignot
- Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France
| | - Elise Langouet
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié–Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Amalric
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Armand Mekontso-Dessap
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Luis Chiscano-Camon
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain,SODIR, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katy Surman
- Intensive Care, Division of Surgery, Transplant and Anaesthetics, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dylan Finnerty
- Intensive Care, Division of Surgery, Transplant and Anaesthetics, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Patricia Santa-Teresa
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Arcadipane
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per I Trapianti e Terapia ad alta specializzazione), Palermo, Italy
| | - Pablo Millán
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Aaron Blandino-Ortiz
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Pilar Ricart
- Department of Intensive Care Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona – Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricardo Gimeno-Costa
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, València, Spain
| | - Carlos Luis Albacete
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Philip Fortuna
- Medical Emergency Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Peter Schellongowski
- Department of Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Centre of Excellence in Medical Intensive Care (CEMIC), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dieter Dauwe
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hadrien Winiszewski
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France,Research Unit EA 3920, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Antoine Kimmoun
- Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France
| | - Bruno Levy
- Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France
| | - Greet Hermans
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giacomo Grasselli
- Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenza, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy,Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France,Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié–Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Guervilly
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France,CEReSS - Centre for Studies and Research on Health Services and Quality of Life EA3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Gennaro Martucci
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per I Trapianti e Terapia ad alta specializzazione), Palermo, Italy
| | - Christian Karagiannidis
- ARDS and ECMO Centre Cologne-Merheim, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany,Department of Cardiovascular Engineering, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jordi Riera
- SODIR, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alain Combes
- INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Laigle-Donadey F, Metellus P, Guyotat J, Menei P, Proust F, Dufour H, Chinot O, Honnorat J, Faillot T, Paquis P, Peruzzi P, Emery E, Guillamo JS, Carpentier A, Wager M, Lebbah S, Hajage D, Delattre JY, Cornu P, _ _. Surgery for glioblastomas in the elderly: an Association des Neuro-oncologues d’Expression Française (ANOCEF) trial. J Neurosurg 2022; 138:1199-1205. [PMID: 36242578 DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.jns221068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The role of surgery in the treatment of malignant gliomas in the elderly is not settled. The authors conducted a randomized trial that compared tumor resection with biopsy only—both followed by standard therapy—in such patients.
METHODS
Patients ≥ 70 years of age with a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥ 50 and presenting with a radiological suspicion of operable glioblastoma (GBM) were randomly assigned between tumor resection and biopsy groups. Subsequently, they underwent standard radiotherapy during the first years of the trial (2008–2017), with the addition of adjunct therapy with temozolomide when this regimen became standard (2017–2019). The primary endpoint was survival, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), cognitive status (Mini-Mental State Examination), autonomy (KPS), quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20), and perioperative morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS
Between 2008 and 2019, 107 patients from 9 centers were enrolled in the study; 101 were evaluable for analysis because a GBM was histologically confirmed (50 in the surgery arm and 51 in the biopsy arm). There was no statistically significant difference in median survival between the surgery (9.37 months) and the biopsy (8.96 months, p = 0.36) arms (adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.52–1.21, p = 0.28). However, the surgery group had an increased PFS (5.06 vs 4.02 months; p = 0.034) (adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32–0.78, p = 0.002). Less deterioration of quality of life and KPS score evolution than in the biopsy group was observed. Surgery was not associated with increased mortality or morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that debulking surgery is safe, and—compared to biopsy—is associated with a less severe deterioration of quality of life and autonomy, as well as a significant although modest improvement of PFS in elderly patients suffering from newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Although resection does not provide a significant survival benefit in the elderly, the authors believe that the risk/benefit analysis favors an attempt at optimal tumor resection in this population, provided there is careful preoperative geriatric evaluation.
Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02892708 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Laigle-Donadey
- Department of Neurology 2, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris
| | | | | | - Philippe Menei
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Angers
| | | | | | | | - Jérôme Honnorat
- Neurooncology, University Hospital of Lyon HCL, Lyon
- NeuroMyogène Institute, Synaptopathies and Autoanticorps Team, University Claude Bernard of Lyon
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Alexandre Carpentier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Michel Wager
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Poitiers
| | - Said Lebbah
- Clinical Research Unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, APHP, Paris
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne University, INSERM, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, APHP Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris; and
- Department of Public Health, Pharmaco-epidemiological Center, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Delattre
- Department of Neurology 2, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris
| | - Philippe Cornu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hajage D, Combes A, Guervilly C, Lebreton G, Mercat A, Pavot A, Nseir S, Mekontso-Dessap A, Mongardon N, Mira JP, Ricard JD, Beurton A, Tachon G, Kontar L, Le Terrier C, Richard JC, Mégarbane B, Keogh RH, Belot A, Maringe C, Leyrat C, Schmidt M. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Associated with COVID-19: An Emulated Target Trial Analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 206:281-294. [PMID: 35533052 PMCID: PMC9890253 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202111-2495oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Whether patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may benefit from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) compared with conventional invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains unknown. Objectives: To estimate the effect of ECMO on 90-day mortality versus IMV only. Methods: Among 4,244 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 included in a multicenter cohort study, we emulated a target trial comparing the treatment strategies of initiating ECMO versus no ECMO within 7 days of IMV in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2/FiO2 < 80 or PaCO2 ⩾ 60 mm Hg). We controlled for confounding using a multivariable Cox model on the basis of predefined variables. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,235 patients met the full eligibility criteria for the emulated trial, among whom 164 patients initiated ECMO. The ECMO strategy had a higher survival probability on Day 7 from the onset of eligibility criteria (87% vs. 83%; risk difference, 4%; 95% confidence interval, 0-9%), which decreased during follow-up (survival on Day 90: 63% vs. 65%; risk difference, -2%; 95% confidence interval, -10 to 5%). However, ECMO was associated with higher survival when performed in high-volume ECMO centers or in regions where a specific ECMO network organization was set up to handle high demand and when initiated within the first 4 days of IMV and in patients who are profoundly hypoxemic. Conclusions: In an emulated trial on the basis of a nationwide COVID-19 cohort, we found differential survival over time of an ECMO compared with a no-ECMO strategy. However, ECMO was consistently associated with better outcomes when performed in high-volume centers and regions with ECMO capacities specifically organized to handle high demand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive–Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Guervilly
- Medecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre hospitalier Universitaire L’Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine Centre d’Études et de Recherches sur les Services de Santé et qualité de vie EA 3279, Marseille, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive–Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France
- Medecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre hospitalier Universitaire L’Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine Centre d’Études et de Recherches sur les Services de Santé et qualité de vie EA 3279, Marseille, France
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP- Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alain Mercat
- Département de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU d’Angers, Faculté de Santé, Université d’Angers, Angers, France
| | - Arthur Pavot
- Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Saad Nseir
- Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Lille, Inserm U1285, University of Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France
| | - Armand Mekontso-Dessap
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux universitaires Henri Mondor, DMU Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, INSERM Unité U955, Créteil, France
- UPEC (Université Paris Est Créteil), Faculté de Santé de Créteil, IMRB, GRC CARMAS, Créteil, France
| | - Nicolas Mongardon
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm U955 équipe 3, Faculté de Santé, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Jean Paul Mira
- Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire de Paris Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Médecine Intensive Réanimation; Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France; Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Cochin Institute, Inserm U1016, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Damien Ricard
- Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Colombes, France
| | - Alexandra Beurton
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation (Département R3S), and Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Tachon
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Loay Kontar
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Amiens-Picardie, avenue Laennec, Amiens, France
| | - Christophe Le Terrier
- Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Christophe Richard
- Service de Médecine Intensive–Réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse–Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Bruno Mégarbane
- Department of Medical and Toxicological Critical Care, Lariboisière Hospital, APHP, INSERM UMRS-1144, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Ruth H. Keogh
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Aurélien Belot
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Camille Maringe
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clémence Leyrat
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Matthieu Schmidt
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive–Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Charkaoui M, Hajage D, Tubach F, Beaugerie L, Kirchgesner J. Impact of Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Agents on the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Nationwide French Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:893-899. [PMID: 34657962 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Anti-tumour necrosis factor agents [anti-TNF] aim to reduce chronic colonic inflammation and may lower the risk of colorectal cancer [CRC], but the impact of anti-TNF exposure has not yet been assessed in population-based cohort studies. The aim of this nationwide study was to assess the risk of CRC in patients with UC exposed to anti-TNF. METHODS Based on the French health insurance database, patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of UC, previously exposed to or initiating immunosuppressive treatment, were followed from January 1, 2009, until December 31, 2018. The risk of CRC associated with anti-TNF exposure was assessed using marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for baseline and time-varying comorbidities including primary sclerosing cholangitis, UC disease activity, colonoscopic surveillance, and other medications. RESULTS Among 32 403 patients with UC, 15 542 [48.0%] were exposed to anti-TNF. During a median follow-up of 6.1 years [198 249 person-years], 246 incident CRC occurred (incidence rate per 1000 person-years, 1.24; 95% confidence intrval [CI], 1.10-1.41). Whereas the risk of CRC associated with anti-TNF exposure was not decreased in the overall group of patients with UC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.26), anti-TNF exposure was associated with a decreased risk of CRC in patients with long-standing colitis [disease duration ≥10 years] [HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.86]. CONCLUSIONS In a nationwide cohort of patients with UC, anti-TNF exposure was associated with a decreased risk of CRC in patients with long-standing colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeva Charkaoui
- AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Department of Gastroenterology, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.,AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.,AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Beaugerie
- AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Department of Gastroenterology, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Julien Kirchgesner
- AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Department of Gastroenterology, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kedra J, Lafourcade A, Combe B, Dougados M, Hajage D, Fautrel B. Positive impact on 10-year outcome of the window of opportunity for conventional synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2021-002040. [PMID: 35534053 PMCID: PMC9086647 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on 10-year outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients with RA from the ESPOIR cohort with complete data on Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 10 years (n=418) and complete radiographic data at baseline and 10 years (n=343) were included in this study. Outcomes were favourable outcome (FavOut) at 10 years, defined as DAS28 of <2.6 and HAQ score of <0.5 at 10 years, and absence of structural damage progression (AbsSDP) at 10 years, defined as change in Sharp-van der Heijde Score less than the smallest detectable change at 10 years (11.5 points). Three multivariate logistic regression models predicting 10-year outcome were built, considering (1) baseline variables only, (2) baseline variables and DMARD exposure (ever exposed, yes/no) and (3) baseline variables and DMARD exposure as weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) variables. Results Overall, 196/418 (46.9%) patients showed FavOut and 252/343 (73.5%) AbsSDP. WCE models had the best predictive performance, with area under the curve=0.80 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.87) for FavOut and 0.87 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) for AbsSDP. In the WCE model, the odds of FavOut and AbsSDP were reduced with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) initiation at 12 months versus at baseline (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94, and OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98, respectively). Early biologics initiation was not significantly associated with either outcome. Conclusions WCE models can identify and quantify the long-term benefit of early csDMARD initiation on 10-year functional and structural outcomes in patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Kedra
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), UMR S 1136, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France .,APHP, Rheumatology Department, Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Lafourcade
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), UMR S 1136, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Maxime Dougados
- Hopital Cochin (AP-HP), Rheumatology, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), UMR S 1136, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), APHP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), UMR S 1136, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,APHP, Rheumatology Department, Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hausfater P, Boutolleau D, Lacombe K, Beurton A, Dumont M, Constantin JM, Ghosn J, Combes A, Cury N, Guedj R, Djibré M, Bompard R, Mazerand S, Pourcher V, Gimeno L, Marois C, Teyssou E, Marcelin AG, Hajage D, Tubach F. Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated risk factors among frontline health care workers in Paris: the SEROCOV cohort study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:7211. [PMID: 35508515 PMCID: PMC9068621 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10945-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
With the COVID-19 pandemic, documenting whether health care workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 contamination and identifying risk factors is of major concern. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, HCWs from frontline departments were included in March and April 2020 and followed for 3 months. SARS-CoV-2 serology was performed at month 0 (M0), M1, and M3 and RT-PCR in case of symptoms. The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at M3. Risk factors of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at M3 were identified by multivariate logistic regression. Among 1062 HCWs (median [interquartile range] age, 33 [28–42] years; 758 [71.4%] women; 321 [30.2%] physicians), the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at M3 was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] [12.5; 16.9]). Risk factors were the working department specialty, with increased risk for intensive care units (odds ratio 1.80, 95% CI [0.38; 8.58]), emergency departments (3.91 [0.83; 18.43]) and infectious diseases departments (4.22 [0.92; 18.28]); current smoking was associated with reduced risk (0.36 [0.21; 0.63]). Age, sex, professional category, number of years of experience in the job or department, and public transportation use were not significantly associated with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at M3. The rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in frontline HCWs was 14.6% at the end of the first COVID-19 wave in Paris and occurred mainly early. The study argues for an origin of professional in addition to private life contamination and therefore including HCWs in the first-line vaccination target population. It also highlights that smokers were at lower risk. Trial registration The study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04304690 first registered on 11/03/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Hausfater
- Emergency Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. .,GRC-14 BIOSFAST, UMR INSERM 1166, IHU ICAN, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | - David Boutolleau
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Santé Publique (iPLESP), GH AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Virologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Karine Lacombe
- Infectious Disease Department, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Beurton
- Service de Pneumologie-Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université Inserm UMRS Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Margaux Dumont
- Emergency Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, 83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Jean-Michel Constantin
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, GH APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jade Ghosn
- AP-HP, Nord, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, and Université de Paris, INSERM, UMR 1137 IAME, Paris, France
| | - Alain Combes
- INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, and Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, GH APHP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Cury
- Emergency Department, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Romain Guedj
- Pediatric Emergency Deparment, APHP Hôpital Armand Trousseau-Sorbonne Université, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.,Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics-CRESS, INSERM, Université de Paris, 75004, Paris, France
| | - Michel Djibré
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Rudy Bompard
- Emergency Department, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Sandie Mazerand
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Pourcher
- AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Linda Gimeno
- APHP, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pitié Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Clémence Marois
- Unité de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Neurologique, Département de Neurologie, DMU Neurosciences, APHP, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Elisa Teyssou
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Santé Publique (iPLESP), GH AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Virologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Geneviève Marcelin
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Santé Publique (iPLESP), GH AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Virologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- APHP, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pitié Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, 75013, Paris, France.,Département de Santé Publique, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, CIC-1422, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- APHP, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pitié Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, 75013, Paris, France.,Département de Santé Publique, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, CIC-1422, 75013, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Garès V, Chauvet G, Hajage D. Estimateurs de la variance de la fonction dose-réponse d'un traitement estimée par pondération sur le score de propension généralisé. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2022.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
24
|
Simon-Tillaux N, Massol J, Hajage D, De rycke Y, Tubach F, Tohme J, Bouglé A, Belin L. Utilisation des essais ciblés émulés pour limiter les biais dans les études observationnelles: étude de l'effet du levosimendan dans le sevrage de l'ECMO-VA. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2022.03.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
25
|
Le Terrier C, Sigaud F, Lebbah S, Desmedt L, Hajage D, Guérin C, Pugin J, Primmaz S, Terzi N. Early prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome related to COVID-19: a propensity score analysis from the multicentric cohort COVID-ICU network-the ProneCOVID study. Crit Care 2022; 26:71. [PMID: 35331332 PMCID: PMC8944409 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03949-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delaying time to prone positioning (PP) may be associated with higher mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We evaluated the use and the impact of early PP on clinical outcomes in intubated patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) for COVID-19. Methods All intubated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 were involved in a secondary analysis from a prospective multicenter cohort study of COVID-ICU network including 149 ICUs across France, Belgium and Switzerland. Patients were followed-up until Day-90. The primary outcome was survival at Day-60. Analysis used a Cox proportional hazard model including a propensity score. Results Among 2137 intubated patients, 1504 (70.4%) were placed in PP during their ICU stay and 491 (23%) during the first 24 h following ICU admission. One hundred and eighty-one patients (36.9%) of the early PP group had a PaO2/FiO2 ratio > 150 mmHg when prone positioning was initiated. Among non-early PP group patients, 1013 (47.4%) patients had finally been placed in PP within a median delay of 3 days after ICU admission. Day-60 mortality in non-early PP group was 34.2% versus 39.3% in the early PP group (p = 0.038). Day-28 and Day-90 mortality as well as the need for adjunctive therapies was more important in patients with early PP. After propensity score adjustment, no significant difference in survival at Day-60 was found between the two study groups (HR 1.34 [0.96–1.68], p = 0.09 and HR 1.19 [0.998–1.412], p = 0.053 in complete case analysis or in multiple imputation analysis, respectively).
Conclusions In a large multicentric international cohort of intubated ICU patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, PP has been used frequently as a main treatment. In this study, our data failed to show a survival benefit associated with early PP started within 24 h after ICU admission compared to PP after day-1 for all COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation regardless of their severity.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-03949-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Le Terrier
- Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Florian Sigaud
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Said Lebbah
- AP-HP, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmaco-épidémiologie, Paris, France
| | - Luc Desmedt
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Nantes Hôtel-Dieu University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - David Hajage
- AP-HP, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmaco-épidémiologie, Paris, France
| | - Claude Guérin
- Division of Intensive Care, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jérôme Pugin
- Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Steve Primmaz
- Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Terzi
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France. .,Medical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Avenue Maquis du Grésivaudan, 38700, La Tronche, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Grolleau F, Porcher R, Barbar S, Hajage D, Bourredjem A, Quenot JP, Dreyfuss D, Gaudry S. Personalization of renal replacement therapy initiation: a secondary analysis of the AKIKI and IDEAL-ICU trials. Crit Care 2022; 26:64. [PMID: 35313942 PMCID: PMC8939225 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03936-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trials comparing early and delayed strategies of renal replacement therapy in patients with severe acute kidney injury may have missed differences in survival as a result of mixing together patients at heterogeneous levels of risks. Our aim was to evaluate the heterogeneity of treatment effect on 60-day mortality from an early vs a delayed strategy across levels of risk for renal replacement therapy initiation under a delayed strategy. Methods We used data from the AKIKI, and IDEAL-ICU randomized controlled trials to develop a multivariable logistic regression model for renal replacement therapy initiation within 48 h after allocation to a delayed strategy. We then used an interaction with spline terms in a Cox model to estimate treatment effects across the predicted risks of RRT initiation. Results We analyzed data from 1107 patients (619 and 488 in the AKIKI and IDEAL-ICU trial respectively). In the pooled sample, we found evidence for heterogeneous treatment effects (P = 0.023). Patients at an intermediate-high risk of renal replacement therapy initiation within 48 h may have benefited from an early strategy (absolute risk difference, − 14%; 95% confidence interval, − 27% to − 1%). For other patients, we found no evidence of benefit from an early strategy of renal replacement therapy initiation but a trend for harm (absolute risk difference, 8%; 95% confidence interval, − 5% to 21% in patients at intermediate-low risk). Conclusions We have identified a clinically sound heterogeneity of treatment effect of an early vs a delayed strategy of renal replacement therapy initiation that may reflect varying degrees of kidney demand-capacity mismatch. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-03936-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Grolleau
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université de Paris, French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM U1153), French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE), Paris, France.
| | - Raphaël Porcher
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université de Paris, French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM U1153), French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE), Paris, France
| | - Saber Barbar
- Intensive Care Department, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - David Hajage
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Abderrahmane Bourredjem
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, INSERM CIC1432, Dijon, and Clinical Investigation Center, Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Lipness Team, INSERM Research Center, LNC-UMR1231 and LabEx LipSTIC, and INSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Dreyfuss
- Université de Paris, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Louis Mourier, AP-HP and INSERM, UMR S1155 "Common and Rare Kidney Diseases: From Molecular Events To Precision Medicine", Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Gaudry
- Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Avicenne, APHP, UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Common and Rare kidney Diseases (CORAKID), Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Demoule A, Hajage D, Messika J, Jaber S, Diallo H, Coutrot M, Kouatchet A, Azoulay E, Fartoukh M, Hraiech S, Beuret P, Darmon M, Decavèle M, Ricard JD, Chanques G, Mercat A, Schmidt M, Similowski T. Prevalence, Intensity and Clinical Impact of Dyspnea in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 205:917-926. [DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202108-1857oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Demoule
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France
| | | | - Jonathan Messika
- Hôpital Louis-Mourier, 26931, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Colombes, France
| | - Samir Jaber
- University hospital. CHU de MONTPELLIER HOPITAL SAINT ELOI, Intensive Care Unit and transplantation-Departement of Anesthesiology DAR B, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Hassimiou Diallo
- University Hospital Pitié Salpêtrière, 26933, Département Biostatistique Santé Publique et Information Médicale, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France
| | - Maxime Coutrot
- Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, 26933, Service de Medecine Intensive Réanimation - Institut de Cardiologie, Paris, France
| | - Achille Kouatchet
- Service de Reanimation Médicale et Médecine Hyperbare, Angers, France
| | | | - Muriel Fartoukh
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Médecine intensive Réanimatio, Paris, France
| | - Sami Hraiech
- Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, URMITE UMR CNRS 7278, Hôpital Nord, Réanimation des Détresses Respiratoires et Infections Sévères, Marseille, France
| | - Pascal Beuret
- CENTRE HOSPITALIER, SERVICE DE REANIMATION POLYVALENTE, ROANNE, France
| | | | - Maxens Decavèle
- Groupe Hospitalier La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, 55577, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Paris, France
| | | | - Gerald Chanques
- University of Montpellier Hospitals, Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Montpellier, France
| | - Alain Mercat
- Angers University Hospital, Departement de Reanimation medicale et medecine hyperbare, Angers, France
| | - Matthieu Schmidt
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de réanimation médicale, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Similowski
- groupe hospitalier pitié-salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, PARIS, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Papazian L, Schmidt M, Hajage D, Combes A, Petit M, Lebreton G, Rilinger J, Giani M, Le Breton C, Duburcq T, Jozwiak M, Wengenmayer T, Roux D, Parke R, Loundou A, Guervilly C, Boyer L. Effect of prone positioning on survival in adult patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:270-280. [PMID: 35037993 PMCID: PMC8762989 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06604-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies support the potential efficacy of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) for improving survival in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) cases. Prone positioning (PP) has been shown to improve the outcomes of moderate-to-severe ARDS patients. Few studies and no randomized controlled trials have evaluated the effect of PP performed in ECMO patients. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of prone positioning for ARDS patients receiving vvECMO on survival. All authors were contacted to obtain complementary information not mentioned in the original articles. The main objective was to compare 28-day survival in vvECMO patients with PP to vvECMO patients without PP (controls). Results Thirteen studies with a combined population of 1836 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. PP was associated with a significant improvement in 28-day survival (503 survivors among 681 patients in the PP group [74%; 95% CI 71–77] vs. 450 survivors among 770 patients in the control group [58%, 95% CI 55–62]; RR 1.31 [95% CI 1.21–1.41]; I2 22% [95% CI 0–62%]; P < 0.0001). Survival was also improved in terms of other endpoints (60-day survival, 90-day survival, ICU survival, and hospital survival). In contrast, the duration of mechanical ventilation was increased in vvECMO patients with PP (mean difference 11.4 days [95% CI 9.2–13.5]; 0.64 [95% CI 0.50–0.78]; I2 8%; P < 0.0001). Conclusion According to this meta-analysis, survival was improved when prone positioning was used in ARDS patients receiving vvECMO. The impact of this combination on survival should be investigated in prospective randomized controlled trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06604-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Papazian
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
- Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur les Services de Santé et qualité de vie EA 3279, 13005, Marseille, France.
| | - Matthieu Schmidt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Santé Publique, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Petit
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Jonathan Rilinger
- Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Marco Giani
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Camille Le Breton
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 92700, Colombes, France
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, UFR de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France
| | | | - Mathieu Jozwiak
- CHU de Nice, Hôpital Archet 1, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 06200, Nice, France
- Equipe 2 CARRES, UR2CA, Unité de Recherche Clinique Côte d'Azur, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Tobias Wengenmayer
- Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Damien Roux
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 92700, Colombes, France
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, UFR de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Rachael Parke
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anderson Loundou
- CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Christophe Guervilly
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur les Services de Santé et qualité de vie EA 3279, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Boyer
- CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Massart N, Maxime V, Fillatre P, Razazi K, Ferré A, Moine P, Legay F, Voiriot G, Amara M, Santi F, Nseir S, Marque-Juillet S, Bounab R, Barbarot N, Bruneel F, Luyt CE, Pham T, Pavot A, Monnet X, Richard C, Demoule A, Dres M, Mayaux J, Beurton A, Daubin C, Descamps R, Joret A, Du Cheyron D, Pene F, Chiche JD, Jozwiak M, Jaubert P, Voiriot G, Fartoukh M, Teulier M, Blayau C, Bodenes L, Ferriere N, Auchabie J, Le Meur A, Pignal S, Mazzoni T, Quenot JP, Andreu P, Roudau JB, Labruyère M, Nseir S, Preau S, Poissy J, Mathieu D, Benhamida S, Paulet R, Roucaud N, Thyrault M, Daviet F, Hraiech S, Parzy G, Sylvestre A, Jochmans S, Bouilland AL, Monchi M, Déserts MDD, Mathais Q, Rager G, Pasquier P, Reignier J, Seguin A, Garret C, Canet E, Dellamonica J, Saccheri C, Lombardi R, Kouchit Y, Jacquier S, Mathonnet A, Nay MA, Runge I, Martino F, Flurin L, Rolle A, Carles M, Coudroy R, Thille AW, Frat JP, Rodriguez M, Beuret P, Tientcheu A, Vincent A, Michelin F, Tamion F, Carpentier D, Boyer D, Girault C, Gissot V, Ehrmann S, Gandonniere CS, Elaroussi D, Delbove A, Fedun Y, Huntzinger J, Lebas E, Kisoka G, Grégoire C, Marchetta S, Lambermont B, Argaud L, Baudry T, Bertrand PJ, Dargent A, Guitton C, Chudeau N, Landais M, Darreau C, Ferre A, Gros A, Lacave G, Bruneel F, Neuville M, JérômeDevaquet, Tachon G, Gallo R, Chelha R, Galbois A, Jallot A, Lemoine LC, Kuteifan K, Pointurier V, Jandeaux LM, Mootien J, Damoisel C, Sztrymf B, Schmidt M, Combes A, Chommeloux J, Luyt CE, Schortgen F, Rusel L, Jung C, Gobert F, Vimpere D, Lamhaut L, Sauneuf B, Charrrier L, Calus J, Desmeules I, Painvin B, Tadie JM, Castelain V, Michard B, Herbrecht JE, Baldacini M, Weiss N, Demeret S, Marois C, Rohaut B, Moury PH, Savida AC, Couadau E, Série M, Alexandru N, Bruel C, Fontaine C, Garrigou S, Mahler JC, Leclerc M, Ramakers M, Garçon P, Massou N, Van Vong L, Sen J, Lucas N, Chemouni F, Stoclin A, Avenel A, Faure H, Gentilhomme A, Ricome S, Abraham P, Monard C, Textoris J, Rimmele T, Montini F, Lejour G, Lazard T, Etienney I, Kerroumi Y, Dupuis C, Bereiziat M, Coupez E, Thouy F, Hoffmann C, Donat N, Chrisment A, Blot RM, Kimmoun A, Jacquot A, Mattei M, Levy B, Ravan R, Dopeux L, Liteaudon JM, Roux D, Rey B, Anghel R, Schenesse D, Gevrey V, Castanera J, Petua P, Madeux B, Hartman O, Piagnerelli M, Joosten A, Noel C, Biston P, Noel T, Bouar GLE, Boukhanza M, Demarest E, Bajolet MF, Charrier N, Quenet A, Zylberfajn C, Dufour N, Mégarbane B, Voicu S, Deye N, Malissin I, Legay F, Debarre M, Barbarot N, Fillatre P, Delord B, Laterrade T, Saghi T, Pujol W, Cungi PJ, Esnault P, Cardinale M, Ha VHT, Fleury G, Brou MA, Zafimahazo D, Tran-Van D, Avargues P, Carenco L, Robin N, Ouali A, Houdou L, Le Terrier C, Suh N, Primmaz S, Pugin J, Weiss E, Gauss T, Moyer JD, Burtz CP, La Combe B, Smonig R, Violleau J, Cailliez P, Chelly J, Marchalot A, Saladin C, Bigot C, Fayolle PM, Fatséas J, Ibrahim A, Resiere D, Hage R, Cholet C, Cantier M, Trouiler P, Montravers P, Lortat-Jacob B, Tanaka S, Dinh AT, Duranteau J, Harrois A, Dubreuil G, Werner M, Godier A, Hamada S, Zlotnik D, Nougue H, Mekontso-Dessap A, Carteaux G, Razazi K, De Prost N, Mongardon N, Lamraoui M, Alessandri C, de Roux Q, de Roquetaillade C, Chousterman BG, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Garnier M, Pardo E, LeaSatre-Buisson, Gutton C, Yvin E, Marcault C, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Oufella HA, Hariri G, Urbina T, Mazerand S, Heming N, Santi F, Moine P, Annane D, Bouglé A, Omar E, Lancelot A, Begot E, Plantefeve G, Contou D, Mentec H, Pajot O, Faguer S, Cointault O, Lavayssiere L, Nogier MB, Jamme M, Pichereau C, Hayon J, Outin H, Dépret F, Coutrot M, Chaussard M, Guillemet L, Goffin P, Thouny R, Guntz J, Jadot L, Persichini R, Jean-Michel V, Georges H, Caulier T, Pradel G, Hausermann MH, Nguyen-Valat TMH, Boudinaud M, Vivier E, SylvèneRosseli, Bourdin G, Pommier C, Vinclair M, Poignant S, Mons S, Bougouin W, Bruna F, Maestraggi Q, Roth C, Bitker L, Dhelft F, Bonnet-Chateau J, Filippelli M, Morichau-Beauchant T, Thierry S, Le Roy C, Jouan MS, Goncalves B, Mazeraud A, Daniel M, Sharshar T, Cadoz C, RostaneGaci, Gette S, Louis G, Sacleux SC, Ordan MA, Cravoisy A, Conrad M, Courte G, Gibot S, Benzidi Y, Casella C, Serpin L, Setti JL, Besse MC, Bourreau A, Pillot J, Rivera C, Vinclair C, Robaux MA, Achino C, Delignette MC, Mazard T, Aubrun F, Bouchet B, Frérou A, Muller L, Quentin C, Degoul S, Stihle X, Sumian C, Bergero N, Lanaspre B, Quintard H, Maiziere EM, Egreteau PY, Leloup G, Berteau F, Cottrel M, Bouteloup M, Jeannot M, Blanc Q, Saison J, Geneau I, Grenot R, Ouchike A, Hazera P, Masse AL, Demiri S, Vezinet C, Baron E, Benchetrit D, Monsel A, Trebbia G, Schaack E, Lepecq R, Bobet M, Vinsonneau C, Dekeyser T, Delforge Q, Rahmani I, Vivet B, Paillot J, Hierle L, Chaignat C, Valette S, Her B, Brunet J, Page M, Boiste F, Collin A, Bavozet F, Garin A, Dlala M, KaisMhamdi, Beilouny B, Lavalard A, Perez S, Veber B, Guitard PG, Gouin P, Lamacz A, Plouvier F, Delaborde BP, Kherchache A, Chaalal A, Ricard JD, Amouretti M, Freita-Ramos S, Roux D, Constantin JM, Assefi M, Lecore M, Selves A, Prevost F, Lamer C, Shi R, Knani L, Floury SP, Vettoretti L, Levy M, Marsac L, Dauger S, Guilmin-Crépon S, Winiszewski H, Piton G, Soumagne T, Capellier G, Putegnat JB, Bayle F, Perrou M, Thao G, Géri G, Charron C, Repessé X, Vieillard-Baron A, Guilbart M, Roger PA, Hinard S, Macq PY, Chaulier K, Goutte S, Chillet P, Pitta A, Darjent B, Bruneau A, Lasocki S, Leger M, Gergaud S, Lemarie P, Terzi N, Schwebel C, Dartevel A, Galerneau LM, Diehl JL, Hauw-Berlemont C, Péron N, Guérot E, Amoli AM, Benhamou M, Deyme JP, Andremont O, Lena D, Cady J, Causeret A, De La Chapelle A, Cracco C, Rouleau S, Schnell D, Foucault C, Lory C, Chapelle T, Bruckert V, Garcia J, Sahraoui A, Abbosh N, Bornstain C, Pernet P, Poirson F, Pasem A, Karoubi P, Poupinel V, Gauthier C, Bouniol F, Feuchere P, Heron A, Carreira S, Emery M, Le Floch AS, Giovannangeli L, Herzog N, Giacardi C, Baudic T, Thill C, Lebbah S, Palmyre J, Tubach F, Hajage D, Bonnet N, Ebstein N, Gaudry S, Cohen Y, Noublanche J, Lesieur O, Sément A, Roca-Cerezo I, Pascal M, Sma N, Colin G, Lacherade JC, Bionz G, Maquigneau N, Bouzat P, Durand M, Hérault MC, Payen JF. Correction to: Characteristics and prognosis of bloodstream infection in patients with COVID‑19 admitted in the ICU: an ancillary study of the COVID‑ICU study. Ann Intensive Care 2022; 12:4. [PMID: 35015163 PMCID: PMC8748185 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-00979-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
30
|
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Dechartres A, Quenot JP, Dreyfuss D. Renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury - Authors' reply. Lancet 2021; 396:1975-1976. [PMID: 33341137 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32673-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Gaudry
- Département de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France; Health Care Simulation Center, UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France; Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France; Investigation Network Initiative-Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists, Bobigny, France
| | - David Hajage
- Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France
| | - Agnès Dechartres
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France; Department of Lipness Team, INSERM Research Center LNC-UMR1231 and LabExLipSTIC, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, INSERM CIC 1432, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Dreyfuss
- Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes 92110, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Schmidt M, Guidet B, Demoule A, Ponnaiah M, Fartoukh M, Puybasset L, Combes A, Hajage D. Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:170. [PMID: 34897559 PMCID: PMC8665857 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00956-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting outcomes of critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) is a major challenge to avoid futile, and prolonged ICU stays. METHODS The objective was to develop predictive survival models for patients with COVID-19 after 1-to-2 weeks in ICU. Based on the COVID-ICU cohort, which prospectively collected characteristics, management, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Machine learning was used to develop dynamic, clinically useful models able to predict 90-day mortality using ICU data collected on day (D) 1, D7 or D14. RESULTS Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC)-1, SOSIC-7, and SOSIC-14 scores were constructed with 4244, 2877, and 1349 patients, respectively, randomly assigned to development or test datasets. The three models selected 15 ICU-entry variables recorded on D1, D7, or D14. Cardiovascular, renal, and pulmonary functions on prediction D7 or D14 were among the most heavily weighted inputs for both models. For the test dataset, SOSIC-7's area under the ROC curve was slightly higher (0.80 [0.74-0.86]) than those for SOSIC-1 (0.76 [0.71-0.81]) and SOSIC-14 (0.76 [0.68-0.83]). Similarly, SOSIC-1 and SOSIC-7 had excellent calibration curves, with similar Brier scores for the three models. CONCLUSION The SOSIC scores showed that entering 15 to 27 baseline and dynamic clinical parameters into an automatable XGBoost algorithm can potentially accurately predict the likely 90-day mortality post-ICU admission (sosic.shinyapps.io/shiny). Although external SOSIC-score validation is still needed, it is an additional tool to strengthen decisions about life-sustaining treatments and informing family members of likely prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Schmidt
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France. .,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, iCAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), 47, bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. .,Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
| | - Bertrand Guidet
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, INSERM, Service de Réanimation, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Demoule
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive-Réanimation (Département R3S), Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRS_1158, Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Maharajah Ponnaiah
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - Muriel Fartoukh
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Tenon, Département Médico-Universitaire APPROCHES, APHP, Paris, France.,Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Louis Puybasset
- CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, iCAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), 47, bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.,Sorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), INSER, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Luyt CE, Hajage D, Burrel S, Hraiech S, Diallo MH, Papazian L, Boutolleau D. Efficacy of Acyclovir to Suppress Herpes Simplex Virus Oropharyngeal Reactivation in Patients Who Are Mechanically Ventilated: An Ancillary Study of the Preemptive Treatment for Herpesviridae (PTH) Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2139825. [PMID: 34928361 PMCID: PMC8689380 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This analysis of a randomized clinical trial examines the efficacy of acyclovir for preventing oropharyngeal HSV reactivation among patients who were mechanically ventilated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Sorbonne Université, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Institut national de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité Mixte de Recherche S 1166-Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, Institut national de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-1421, Paris, France
| | - Sonia Burrel
- Centre National de Référence Herpèsvirus, Département de Virologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Sami Hraiech
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Aix-Marseille Université, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Mamadou Hassimiou Diallo
- Sorbonne Université, Institut national de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-1421, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Papazian
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Aix-Marseille Université, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - David Boutolleau
- Centre National de Référence Herpèsvirus, Département de Virologie, Sorbonne Université, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roux C, Rozes A, Reizine D, Hajage D, Daniel C, Maire A, Bréant S, Taright N, Gordon R, Fechtenbaum J, Kolta S, Feydy A, Briot K, Tubach F. Fully automated opportunistic screening of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis on more than 150,000 routine computed tomography scans. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:3269-3278. [PMID: 34850864 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated, although severe complications of osteoporotic fractures, including vertebral fractures, are well known. This study sought to assess the feasibility and results of an opportunistic screening of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis in a large database of lumbar or abdominal CT scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data were analyzed from CT scans obtained in 35 hospitals from patients aged 60 years and more and stored in a Picture Archiving and Communication System in Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, from 2007 to 2013. Dedicated software analyzed the presence of at least 1 vertebral fracture (VF), and measured Hounsfield Units (HU) in lumbar vertebrae. A simulated T-score was calculated. RESULTS Data were analyzed from 152 268 patients (73.2 ± 9.07 years). Success rates for VF assessment and HU measurements were 82 and 87% respectively. Prevalence of VF was 24.5% and increased with age. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the detection of VF were 0.61 and 0.62 for mean HU of lumbar vertebrae and L1 HU, respectively. In patients without VF, HU decreased with age, similarly in males and females. The prevalence of osteoporosis (sT-score ≤ - 2.5) was 23.8% and 36.5% in patients without and with VFs respectively. CONCLUSION Opportunistic screening in patients 60 years and older having lumbar or abdominal CT scans is feasible at large scale to screen vertebral fractures and osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Roux
- Department of Rheumatology, INSERM UMR 1153, APHP. Centre-Université de Paris, Institut de Recherche des Maladies Ostéo-Articulaires de l'Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin
| | - Antoine Rozes
- AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901
| | | | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901
| | - Christel Daniel
- AP-HP, Direction des Systèmes d'Information, Pôle Innovation et Données
- INSERM UMRS 1142
| | - Aurélien Maire
- AP-HP, Direction des Systèmes d'Information, Pôle Innovation et Données
| | - Stéphane Bréant
- AP-HP, Direction des Systèmes d'Information, Pôle Innovation et Données
| | - Namik Taright
- AP-HP, Direction de la Stratégie et de la Transformation, Pôle Sciences des données et Information médicale, Paris, France
| | | | - Jacques Fechtenbaum
- Department of Rheumatology, APHP, Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin
| | - Sami Kolta
- Department of Rheumatology, APHP, Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin
| | - Antoine Feydy
- Department of Rheumatology, INSERM UMR 1153, APHP. Centre-Université de Paris, Institut de Recherche des Maladies Ostéo-Articulaires de l'Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin
- Service de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire, Hôpital Cochin, Collégiale de Radiologie, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Karine Briot
- Department of Rheumatology, INSERM UMR 1153, APHP. Centre-Université de Paris, Institut de Recherche des Maladies Ostéo-Articulaires de l'Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schmidt M, Langouet E, Hajage D, James SA, Chommeloux J, Bréchot N, Barhoum P, Lefèvre L, Troger A, de Chambrun MP, Hékimian G, Luyt CE, Dres M, Constantin JM, Fartoukh M, Leprince P, Lebreton G, Combes A. Evolving outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for severe COVID-19 ARDS in Sorbonne hospitals, Paris. Crit Care 2021; 25:355. [PMID: 34627350 PMCID: PMC8502094 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03780-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was frequently used to treat patients with severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress (ARDS) during the initial outbreak. Care of COVID-19 patients evolved markedly during the second part of 2020. Our objective was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received ECMO for severe COVID-19 ARDS before or after July 1, 2020. Methods We included consecutive adults diagnosed with COVID-19 in Paris–Sorbonne University Hospital Network ICUs, who received ECMO for severe ARDS until January 28, 2021. Characteristics and survival probabilities over time were estimated during the first and second waves. Pre-ECMO risk factors predicting 90-day mortality were assessed using multivariate Cox regression. Results Characteristics of the 88 and 71 patients admitted, respectively, before and after July 1, 2020, were comparable except for older age, more frequent use of dexamethasone (18% vs. 82%), high-flow nasal oxygenation (19% vs. 82%) and/or non-invasive ventilation (7% vs. 37%) after July 1. Respective estimated probabilities (95% confidence intervals) of 90-day mortality were 36% (27–47%) and 48% (37–60%) during the first and the second periods. After adjusting for confounders, probability of 90-day mortality was significantly higher for patients treated after July 1 (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.02–5.07). ECMO-related complications did not differ between study periods. Conclusions 90-day mortality of ECMO-supported COVID-19–ARDS patients increased significantly after July 1, 2020, and was no longer comparable to that of non-COVID ECMO-treated patients. Failure of prolonged non-invasive oxygenation strategies before intubation and increased lung damage may partly explain this outcome. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03780-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Schmidt
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. .,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. .,GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | - Elise Langouet
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - David Hajage
- INSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Santé Publique, APHP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, CIC-1421, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Aissi James
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Juliette Chommeloux
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Nicolas Bréchot
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Petra Barhoum
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Lucie Lefèvre
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Antoine Troger
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Marc Pineton de Chambrun
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Guillaume Hékimian
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Martin Dres
- GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive-Réanimation (Département "R3S"), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Inserm, UMRS_1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale Et Clinique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Michel Constantin
- GRC 29, APHP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Muriel Fartoukh
- GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Leprince
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Paris, Sorbonne, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP, Paris, Sorbonne, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Inserm, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, iCAN, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47, Bd de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.,GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Louis G, Quenot JP, Dreyfuss D. The AKIKI 2 trial: a case for strategy of initiation instead of timing - Authors' reply. Lancet 2021; 398:1215-1216. [PMID: 34600623 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01954-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Gaudry
- Département de réanimation médico-chirurgicale, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France; Health Care Simulation Center, UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France; Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France; Investigation Network Initiative-Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists, Bobigny, France
| | - David Hajage
- Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France; INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Louis
- Réanimation polyvalente, CHR Metz-Thionville Hôpital de Mercy, Metz, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France; INSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Dreyfuss
- Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPIRIT, Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Colombes 92110, France.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Martin GL, Trioux T, Gaudry S, Tubach F, Hajage D, Dechartres A. Association Between Lack of Blinding and Mortality Results in Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:1800-1811. [PMID: 33927122 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether intervention effect estimates for mortality differ between blinded and nonblinded randomized controlled trials conducted in critical care. We used a meta-epidemiological approach, comparing effect estimates between blinded and nonblinded randomized controlled trials for the same research question. DATA SOURCES Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials evaluating a therapeutic intervention on mortality in critical care, published between January 2009 and March 2019 in high impact factor general medical or critical care journals and by Cochrane. DATA EXTRACTION For each randomized controlled trial included in eligible meta-analyses, we evaluated whether the trial was blinded (i.e., double-blinded and/or reporting adequate methods) or not (i.e., open-label, single-blinded, or unclear). We collected risk of bias evaluated by the review authors and extracted trial results. DATA SYNTHESIS Within each meta-analysis, we compared intervention effect estimates between blinded and nonblinded randomized controlled trials by using a ratio of odds ratio (< 1 indicates larger estimates in nonblinded than blinded randomized controlled trials). We then combined ratio of odds ratios across meta-analyses to obtain the average relative difference between nonblinded and blinded trials. Among 467 randomized controlled trials included in 36 meta-analyses, 267 (57%) were considered blinded and 200 (43%) nonblinded. Intervention effect estimates were statistically significantly larger in nonblinded than blinded trials (combined ratio of odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99). We found no heterogeneity across meta-analyses (p = 0.72; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0). Sensitivity analyses adjusting the main analysis on risk of bias items yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS Intervention effect estimates of mortality were slightly larger in nonblinded than blinded randomized controlled trials conducted in critical care, but confounding cannot be excluded. Blinding of both patients and personnel is important to consider when possible in critical care trials, even when evaluating mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume L Martin
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Théo Trioux
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Gaudry
- Département de réanimation médico-chirurgicale, APHP, Hôpital Avicenne, UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France
- Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Agnès Dechartres
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Laigle-Donadey F, Metellus P, Guyotat J, Menei P, Proust F, Dufour H, Chinot O, Honnorat J, Faillot T, Paquis P, Peruzzi P, Emery E, Guillamo JS, Carpentier A, Wager M, Lebbah S, Hajage D, Delattre JY, Cornu P. PL03.1.A Surgery for glioblastomas in the elderly: an ANOCEF trial (CSA). Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab180.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The role of surgery for the treatment of malignant gliomas in patients 70 years of age or older is unsettled. We conducted a randomized trial that compared surgical resection of the tumor and biopsy only, both followed by standard therapy, in such patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Patients aged 70 years and older, with a KPS of at least 50, presenting with a radiological suspicion of an operable glioblastoma (GBM) were randomly assigned between tumor resection and biopsy. Subsequently, they underwent standard radiotherapy during the first years of the trial (2008–2017), with the adjunction of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide when this regimen became standard (2017–2019). The primary end point was survival; secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), cognitive status (MMS), autonomy (KPS), quality of life (EORTC QLQ C30 and BN20), and perioperative morbidity/ mortality.
RESULTS
From 2008 to 2019, 107 patients from 9 centers were enrolled in the study, of whom 101 were evaluable for analysis because the diagnosis of GBM was histologically confirmed (50 patients in the “surgery” arm and 51 patients in the “biopsy” arm). There was no statistically significant difference of median survival between the “surgery” arm (9.37 mo) and the “biopsy” arms (8.96 mo, p=0.36). However, the surgery group had increased PFS (5.06 mo vs 4.02 mo; p=0.034; p=0.002 on multivariate analysis) and better QOL (e.g. physical and cognitive functioning, motor dysfunction, fatigue) and KPS score evolution as compared to the “biopsy” group. Surgery was not associated with increased mortality or morbidity.
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that optimal debulking surgery does not provide a significant survival benefit in elderly patients suffering from newly diagnosed malignant glioma, but resection improves QOL and autonomy with a significant though modest improvement of PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - P Metellus
- Hôpital Privé Clairval, Marseille, France
| | | | - P Menei
- CHU d’Angers, Angers, France
| | - F Proust
- Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - H Dufour
- Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - O Chinot
- Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M Wager
- CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - S Lebbah
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - D Hajage
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - P Cornu
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Garès V, Chauvet G, Hajage D. Variance estimators for weighted and stratified linear dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score. Biom J 2021; 64:33-56. [PMID: 34327720 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202000267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Propensity score methods are widely used in observational studies for evaluating marginal treatment effects. The generalized propensity score (GPS) is an extension of the propensity score framework, historically developed in the case of binary exposures, for use with quantitative or continuous exposures. In this paper, we proposed variance estimators for treatment effect estimators on continuous outcomes. Dose-response functions (DRFs) were estimated through weighting on the inverse of the GPS, or using stratification. Variance estimators were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. Despite the use of stabilized weights, the variability of the weighted estimator of the DRF was particularly high, and none of the variance estimators (a bootstrap-based estimator, a closed-form estimator especially developed to take into account the estimation step of the GPS, and a sandwich estimator) were able to adequately capture this variability, resulting in coverages below the nominal value, particularly when the proportion of the variation in the quantitative exposure explained by the covariates was large. The stratified estimator was more stable, and variance estimators (a bootstrap-based estimator, a pooled linearized estimator, and a pooled model-based estimator) more efficient at capturing the empirical variability of the parameters of the DRF. The pooled variance estimators tended to overestimate the variance, whereas the bootstrap estimator, which intrinsically takes into account the estimation step of the GPS, resulted in correct variance estimations and coverage rates. These methods were applied to a real data set with the aim of assessing the effect of maternal body mass index on newborn birth weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie Garès
- Univ Rennes, INSA, CNRS, IRMAR - UMR 6625, F-35000, Rennes, France
| | | | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dres M, Hajage D, Lebbah S, Kimmoun A, Pham T, Béduneau G, Combes A, Mercat A, Guidet B, Demoule A, Schmidt M. Characteristics, management, and prognosis of elderly patients with COVID-19 admitted in the ICU during the first wave: insights from the COVID-ICU study : Prognosis of COVID-19 elderly critically ill patients in the ICU. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:77. [PMID: 33988767 PMCID: PMC8120254 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00861-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic is a heavy burden in terms of health care resources. Future decision-making policies require consistent data on the management and prognosis of the older patients (> 70 years old) with COVID-19 admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods Characteristics, management, and prognosis of critically ill old patients (> 70 years) were extracted from the international prospective COVID-ICU database. A propensity score weighted-comparison evaluated the impact of intubation upon admission on Day-90 mortality. Results The analysis included 1199 (28% of the COVID-ICU cohort) patients (median [interquartile] age 74 [72–78] years). Fifty-three percent, 31%, and 16% were 70–74, 75–79, and over 80 years old, respectively. The most frequent comorbidities were chronic hypertension (62%), diabetes (30%), and chronic respiratory disease (25%). Median Clinical Frailty Scale was 3 (2–3). Upon admission, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 154 (105–222). 740 (62%) patients were intubated on Day-1 and eventually 938 (78%) during their ICU stay. Overall Day-90 mortality was 46% and reached 67% among the 193 patients over 80 years old. Mortality was higher in older patients, diabetics, and those with a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio upon admission, cardiovascular dysfunction, and a shorter time between first symptoms and ICU admission. In propensity analysis, early intubation at ICU admission was associated with a significantly higher Day-90 mortality (42% vs 28%; hazard ratio 1.68; 95% CI 1.24–2.27; p < 0·001). Conclusion Patients over 70 years old represented more than a quarter of the COVID-19 population admitted in the participating ICUs during the first wave. Day-90 mortality was 46%, with dismal outcomes reported for patients older than 80 years or those intubated upon ICU admission. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-021-00861-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Dres
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation (Département R3S), Service de Médecine intensive Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-73, bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. .,UMR S 1136, Sorbonne Université INSERM UMRS_1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Said Lebbah
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Kimmoun
- Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation Brabois, Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Paris, France.,INSERM U1116, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Tai Pham
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.,Équipe d'Épidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, Center for Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Gaëtan Béduneau
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, EA 3830, Rouen, France.,Medical Intensive Care Unit, Rouen University Hospital, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-iCAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.,Médecine intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Alain Mercat
- Département de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation et Médecine Hyperbare, Faculté de Santé, CHU d'Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - Bertrand Guidet
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.,Médecine intensive Réanimation, APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Demoule
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation (Département R3S), Service de Médecine intensive Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-73, bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.,UMR S 1136, Sorbonne Université INSERM UMRS_1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Schmidt
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-iCAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.,Médecine intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hajage D, Pourcher V, Paccoud O, Bleibtreu A, Caumes E, Tubach F. Reply to Million et al. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 72:e440-e441. [PMID: 32761119 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Centre de Pharmaco-épidémiologie de l'AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Pourcher
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Maladies infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Paccoud
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Maladies infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Bleibtreu
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Maladies infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris, France
| | - Eric Caumes
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Maladies infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMR 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Centre de Pharmaco-épidémiologie de l'AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Benichou N, Lebbah S, Hajage D, Martin-Lefèvre L, Pons B, Boulet E, Boyer A, Chevrel G, Lerolle N, Carpentier D, de Prost N, Lautrette A, Bretagnol A, Mayaux J, Nseir S, Megarbane B, Thirion M, Forel JM, Maizel J, Yonis H, Markowicz P, Thiery G, Schortgen F, Tubach F, Ricard JD, Dreyfuss D, Gaudry S. Vascular access for renal replacement therapy among 459 critically ill patients: a pragmatic analysis of the randomized AKIKI trial. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:56. [PMID: 33830370 PMCID: PMC8032839 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00843-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vascular access for renal replacement therapy (RRT) is routine question in the intensive care unit. Randomized trials comparing jugular and femoral sites have shown similar rate of nosocomial events and catheter dysfunction. However, recent prospective observational data on RRT catheters use are scarce. We aimed to assess the site of RRT catheter, the reasons for catheter replacement, and the complications according to site in a large population of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed an ancillary study of the AKIKI study, a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, in which patients with severe acute kidney injury (KDIGO 3 classification) with invasive mechanical ventilation, catecholamine infusion or both were randomly assigned to either an early or a delayed RRT initiation strategy. The present study involved all patients who underwent at least one RRT session. Number of RRT catheters, insertion sites, factors potentially associated with the choice of insertion site, duration of catheter use, reason for catheter replacement, and complications were prospectively collected. RESULTS Among the 619 patients included in AKIKI, 462 received RRT and 459 were finally included, with 598 RRT catheters. Femoral site was chosen preferentially (n = 319, 53%), followed by jugular (n = 256, 43%) and subclavian (n = 23, 4%). In multivariate analysis, continuous RRT modality was significantly associated with femoral site (OR = 2.33 (95% CI (1.34-4.07), p = 0.003) and higher weight with jugular site [88.9 vs 83.2 kg, OR = 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00), p = 0.03]. Investigator site was also significantly associated with the choice of insertion site (p = 0.03). Cumulative incidence of catheter replacement did not differ between jugular and femoral site [sHR 0.90 (95% CI 0.64-1.25), p = 0.67]. Catheter dysfunction was the main reason for replacement (n = 47), followed by suspected infection (n = 29) which was actually seldom proven (n = 4). No mechanical complication (pneumothorax or hemothorax) occurred. CONCLUSION Femoral site was preferentially used in this prospective study of RRT catheters in 31 French intensive care units. The choice of insertion site depended on investigating center habits, weight, RRT modality. A high incidence of catheter infection suspicion led to undue replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Benichou
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service de Néphrologie, 75015, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), UMR_S1155, Remodeling and Repair of Renal Tissue, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Saïd Lebbah
- Département de Biostatistiques, Santé Publique Et Information Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Département de Biostatistiques, Santé Publique Et Information Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.,INSERM, ECEVE, U1123, CIC 1421, F-75013, Paris, France.,Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne, Sorbonne Université, Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Bertrand Pons
- Service de Réanimation, CHU de Pointe À Pitre-Abymes, CHU de La Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Eric Boulet
- Réanimation Polyvalente, CH René Dubos, 95301, Pontoise, France
| | - Alexandre Boyer
- Réanimation Médicale CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Guillaume Chevrel
- Service de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Corbeil Essonne, France
| | - Nicolas Lerolle
- Département de Réanimation Médicale Et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU Angers, Université D'Angers, Angers, France
| | | | - Nicolas de Prost
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, DHU A-TVB, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Créteil, France.,CARMAS Research Group and UPEC-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Créteil, France
| | - Alexandre Lautrette
- Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anne Bretagnol
- Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital de La Source, Centre Hospitalier Régional D'Orléans, BP 6709, 45067, Orléans Cedex, France
| | - Julien Mayaux
- Service de Pneumologie Et Réanimation Médicale, APHP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Saad Nseir
- Centre de Réanimation, CHU de Lille, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Bruno Megarbane
- Réanimation Médicale Et Toxicologique, Hôpital Lariboisière, INSERM U1144, Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Marina Thirion
- Réanimation Polyvalente, CH Victor Dupouy, 95107, Argenteuil Cedex, France
| | - Jean-Marie Forel
- Service de Réanimation Des Détresses Respiratoires Aiguës Et Infections Sévères, Hôpital Nord Marseille, 13015, Marseille, France
| | - Julien Maizel
- Service de Réanimation Médicale INSERM U1088, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Hodane Yonis
- Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France
| | | | - Guillaume Thiery
- Service de Réanimation, CHU de Pointe À Pitre-Abymes, CHU de La Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Frederique Schortgen
- Centre Hospitalier Inter-Communal, Service de Réanimation Polyvalente Adulte, Créteil, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Département de Biostatistiques, Santé Publique Et Information Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.,INSERM, ECEVE, U1123, CIC 1421, F-75013, Paris, France.,Univ Pierre Et Marie Curie, Sorbonne Universités, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Damien Ricard
- Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, IAME, UMRS 1137, 75018, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700, Colombes, France
| | - Didier Dreyfuss
- AP-HP, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier, 92700, Colombes, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), UMR_S1155, Remodeling and Repair of Renal Tissue, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Gaudry
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), UMR_S1155, Remodeling and Repair of Renal Tissue, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France. .,AP-HP, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Avicenne, 93008, Bobigny, France. .,Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Hôpital Avicenne, 125 Rue de Stalingrad, 93000, Bobigny, France.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Martin-Lefevre L, Lebbah S, Louis G, Moschietto S, Titeca-Beauport D, Combe BL, Pons B, de Prost N, Besset S, Combes A, Robine A, Beuzelin M, Badie J, Chevrel G, Bohé J, Coupez E, Chudeau N, Barbar S, Vinsonneau C, Forel JM, Thevenin D, Boulet E, Lakhal K, Aissaoui N, Grange S, Leone M, Lacave G, Nseir S, Poirson F, Mayaux J, Asehnoune K, Geri G, Klouche K, Thiery G, Argaud L, Rozec B, Cadoz C, Andreu P, Reignier J, Ricard JD, Quenot JP, Dreyfuss D. Comparison of two delayed strategies for renal replacement therapy initiation for severe acute kidney injury (AKIKI 2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2021; 397:1293-1300. [PMID: 33812488 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00350-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delaying renal replacement therapy (RRT) for some time in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury and no severe complication is safe and allows optimisation of the use of medical devices. Major uncertainty remains concerning the duration for which RRT can be postponed without risk. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that a more-delayed initiation strategy would result in more RRT-free days, compared with a delayed strategy. METHODS This was an unmasked, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled trial done in 39 intensive care units in France. We monitored critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 3) until they had oliguria for more than 72 h or a blood urea nitrogen concentration higher than 112 mg/dL. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) to either a strategy (delayed strategy) in which RRT was started just after randomisation or to a more-delayed strategy. With the more-delayed strategy, RRT initiation was postponed until mandatory indication (noticeable hyperkalaemia or metabolic acidosis or pulmonary oedema) or until blood urea nitrogen concentration reached 140 mg/dL. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and free of RRT between randomisation and day 28 and was done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03396757 and is completed. FINDINGS Between May 7, 2018, and Oct 11, 2019, of 5336 patients assessed, 278 patients underwent randomisation; 137 were assigned to the delayed strategy and 141 to the more-delayed strategy. The number of complications potentially related to acute kidney injury or to RRT were similar between groups. The median number of RRT-free days was 12 days (IQR 0-25) in the delayed strategy and 10 days (IQR 0-24) in the more-delayed strategy (p=0·93). In a multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio for death at 60 days was 1·65 (95% CI 1·09-2·50, p=0·018) with the more-delayed versus the delayed strategy. The number of complications potentially related to acute kidney injury or renal replacement therapy did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION In severe acute kidney injury patients with oliguria for more than 72 h or blood urea nitrogen concentration higher than 112 mg/dL and no severe complication that would mandate immediate RRT, longer postponing of RRT initiation did not confer additional benefit and was associated with potential harm. FUNDING Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Gaudry
- Département de réanimation médico-chirurgicale, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France; Health Care Simulation Center, UFR SMBH, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France; Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France; Investigation Network Initiative-Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists, Bobigny, France
| | - David Hajage
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Saïd Lebbah
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Louis
- Réanimation polyvalente, CHR Metz-Thionville Hôpital de Mercy, Metz, France
| | | | | | | | - Bertrand Pons
- Réanimation, CHU Pointe-à-Pitre-Abymes, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | | | - Sébastien Besset
- Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Colombes, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Service de Réanimation Médicale, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Adrien Robine
- Réanimation Soins continus, CH de Bourg-en-Bresse-Fleyriat, 01012 Bourg-en-Bresse, France
| | | | - Julio Badie
- Réanimation polyvalente, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comte CH Belfort, Belfort, France
| | | | - Julien Bohé
- Anesthésie réanimation médicale et chirurgicale, CH Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite
| | - Elisabeth Coupez
- Réanimation polyvalente, Hôpital G. Montpied, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Chudeau
- Réanimation médico-chirurgicale, CH du Mans, Le Mans, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric Boulet
- Réanimation et USC, GH Carnelle Portes de l'Oise, Beaumont sur Oise, France
| | - Karim Lakhal
- Réanimation chirurgicale polyvalente, Hôpital Nord laennec, Nantes, France
| | - Nadia Aissaoui
- Réanimation médicale, Hôpital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | - Marc Leone
- Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Guillaume Lacave
- Réanimation médico-chirurgicale, Hôpital André Mignot, Versailles, France
| | - Saad Nseir
- Réanimation médicale, CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France
| | - Florent Poirson
- Département de réanimation médico-chirurgicale, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
| | - Julien Mayaux
- Pneumologie et Réanimation médicale, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | - Guillaume Geri
- Réanimation médico-chirurgicale, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Kada Klouche
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Lapeyronnie, Montpellier, France
| | - Guillaume Thiery
- Réanimation médicale, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Laurent Argaud
- Réanimation médicale, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | | | - Cyril Cadoz
- Réanimation polyvalente, CHR Metz-Thionville Hôpital de Mercy, Metz, France
| | - Pascal Andreu
- Médecine intensive réanimation, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Jean Reignier
- Médecine intensive réanimation, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Jean-Damien Ricard
- Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Colombes, France; INSERM, IAME, U1137, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France; Lipness Team, INSERM Research Center LNC-UMR1231 and LabExLipSTIC, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France; INSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Dreyfuss
- Common and Rare Kidney Diseases, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR-S 1155, Paris, France; Université de Paris, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Colombes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Peskine A, Hajage D, Luyt CE. Response. Chest 2021; 159:1303-1304. [PMID: 33678258 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Peskine
- Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, APHP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département Biostatistique Santé Publique et Information Médicale, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1421, Paris, France
| | - Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, and Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mitanchez D, Jacqueminet S, Lebbah S, Dommergues M, Hajage D, Ciangura C. Relative Contribution of Gestational Weight Gain, Gestational Diabetes, and Maternal Obesity to Neonatal Fat Mass. Nutrients 2020; 12:nu12113434. [PMID: 33182482 PMCID: PMC7698189 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternal nutritional and metabolic status influence fetal growth. This study investigated the contribution of gestational weight gain (GWG), gestational diabetes (GDM), and maternal obesity to birthweight and newborn body fat. It is a secondary analysis of a prospective study including 204 women with a pregestational body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 and 219 women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. GDM was screened in the second and third trimester and was treated by dietary intervention, and insulin if required. Maternal obesity had the greatest effect on skinfolds (+1.4 mm) and cord leptin (+3.5 ng/mL), but no effect on birthweight. GWG was associated with increased birthweight and skinfolds thickness, independently from GDM and maternal obesity. There was an interaction between third trimester weight gain and GDM on birthweight and cord leptin, but not with maternal obesity. On average, +1 kg in third trimester was associated with +13 g in birthweight and with +0.64 ng/mL in cord leptin, and a further 32 g and 0.89 ng/mL increase in diabetic mothers, respectively. Maternal obesity is the main contributor to neonatal body fat. There is an independent association between third trimester weight gain, birthweight, and neonatal body fat, enhanced by GDM despite intensive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Mitanchez
- Department of Neonatology, Bretonneau Hospital, François Rabelais University, 37000 Tours, France
- INSERM, UMR_S 938 Saint Antoine Research Centre, Sorbonne University, 75012 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-2-47-47-47-49
| | - Sophie Jacqueminet
- Department of Diabetology, Institute of Cardiometabolism And Nutrition (ICAN), Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France; (S.J.); (C.C.)
| | - Said Lebbah
- Clinic Research Unit, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Marc Dommergues
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - David Hajage
- INSERM, Public Health Department, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, AP-HP, Centre of Pharmacoepidémiology (Cephepi), Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Cécile Ciangura
- Department of Diabetology, Institute of Cardiometabolism And Nutrition (ICAN), Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France; (S.J.); (C.C.)
- Department of Nutrition, Institute of Cardiometbolism And Nutrition (ICAN), Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Straus C, Teulier M, Morel S, Wattiez N, Hajage D, Giboin C, Charbit B, Dasque E, Bodineau L, Chenuel B, Straus N, Attali V, Similowski T. Baclofen destabilises breathing during sleep in healthy humans: A randomised, controlled, double-blind crossover trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 87:1814-1823. [PMID: 32986891 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Periodic breathing is frequent in patients with severe heart failure. Apart from being an indicator of severity, periodic breathing has its own deleterious consequences (sleep-related oxygen desaturations, sleep fragmentation), which justifies attempts to correct it irrespective of the underlying disease. Animal models and human data suggest that baclofen can reconfigure respiratory central pattern generators. We hypothesised that baclofen, a GABAB agonist, may thus be able to correct periodic breathing in humans. METHODS Healthy volunteers were exposed to hypoxia during sleep. Participants who developed periodic breathing (n = 14 [53 screened]) were randomly assigned to double-blind oral baclofen (progressively increased to 60 mg/d) or placebo. The primary outcome was the coefficient of variation (CoVar) of respiratory cycle total time considered as an indicator of breathing irregularity. Secondary outcomes included the CoVar of tidal volume, apnoea-hypopnoea index, sleep fragmentation index and ventilatory complexity (noise limit). RESULTS The analysis was conducted in 9 subjects after exclusion of incomplete datasets. CoVar of respiratory cycle total time significantly increased with baclofen during non-rapid eye movement sleep (median with placebo 56.00% [37.63-78.95]; baclofen 85.42% [68.37-86.40], P = .020; significant difference during the N1-N2 phases of sleep but not during the N3 phase). CoVar of tidal volume significantly increased during N1-N2 sleep. The apnoea-hypopnoea index, sleep fragmentation index and ventilatory complexity were not significantly different between placebo and baclofen. CONCLUSION Baclofen did not stabilise breathing in our model. On the contrary, it increased respiratory variability. Baclofen should probably not be used in patients with or at risk of periodic breathing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Straus
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département R3S, Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles de la Respiration, de l'Exercice et de la Dyspnée, Paris, France
| | - Marion Teulier
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Morel
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Wattiez
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Giboin
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Unité de Recherche Clinique Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | - Beny Charbit
- INSERM and AP-HP, CIC-1901 module Paris-Est, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, CHU Reims, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - Eric Dasque
- INSERM and AP-HP, CIC-1901 module Paris-Est, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Laurence Bodineau
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Chenuel
- CHRU de Nancy, Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires et Centre Universitaire de Médecine du Sport et Activité Physique Adaptée, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Faculté de Médecine de Nancy, EA DevAH - Universié de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Nicolas Straus
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Attali
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département R3S, Service des Pathologies du Sommeil, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Similowski
- Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier APHP-Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département R3S, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gonzalez-Bermejo J, Hajage D, Durand-Zaleski I, Arnal JM, Cuvelier A, Grassion L, Jaffre S, Lamia B, Pontier S, Prigent A, Rabec C, Raherison-Semjen C, Saint Raymond C, Soler J, Trzepizur W, Winck JC, Aguiar M, Chaves H, Conde B, Guimarães MJ, Lopes P, Mineiro A, Moreira S, Pamplona P, Rodrigues CM, Sousa S, Antón A, Córdoba-Izquierdo A, Embid C, Esteban González C, Ezzine F, Garcia P, González M, Guerassimova I, López D, Lujan M, Martí Beltran S, Martinez JM, Masa F, Pascual N, Peñacoba N, Resano P, Rey L, Rodríguez Jerez F, Roncero A, Sancho Chinesta J, Sayas Catalán J. Respiratory support in COPD patients after acute exacerbation with monitoring the quality of support (Rescue2-monitor): an open-label, prospective randomized, controlled, superiority clinical trial comparing hospital- versus home-based acute non-invasive ventilation for patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Trials 2020; 21:877. [PMID: 33092618 PMCID: PMC7578582 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04672-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is expected to be the 3rd leading cause of death worldwide by 2020. Despite improvements in survival by using acute non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to treat patients with exacerbations of COPD complicated by acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF), these patients are at high risk of readmission and further life-threatening events, including death. Recent studies suggested that NIV at home can reduce readmissions, but in a small proportion of patients, and with a high level of expertise. Other studies, however, do not show any benefit of home NIV. This could be related to the fact that respiratory failure in patients with stable COPD and their response to mechanical ventilation are influenced by several pathophysiological factors which frequently coexist in the same patient to varying degrees. These pathophysiological factors might influence the success of home NIV in stable COPD, thus long-term NIV specifically adapted to a patient's "phenotype" is likely to improve prognosis, reduce readmission to hospital, and prevent death. In view of this conundrum, Rescue2-monitor (R2M), an open-label, prospective randomized, controlled study performed in patients with hypercapnic COPD post-AHRF, will investigate the impact of the quality of nocturnal NIV on the readmission-free survival. The primary objective is to show that any of 3 home NIV strategies ("rescue," "non-targeted," and "targeted") will improve readmission-free survival in comparison to no-home NIV. The "targeted" group of patients will receive a treatment with personalized (targeted) ventilation settings and extensive monitoring. Furthermore, the influence of comorbidities typical for COPD patients, such as cardiac insufficiency, OSA, or associated asthma, on ventilation outcomes will be taken into consideration and reasons for non-inclusion of patients will be recorded in order to evaluate the percentage of ventilated COPD patients that are screening failures. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03890224 . Registered on March 26, 2019.
Collapse
|
47
|
Combes A, Peek GJ, Hajage D, Hardy P, Abrams D, Schmidt M, Dechartres A, Elbourne D. ECMO for severe ARDS: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:2048-2057. [PMID: 33021684 PMCID: PMC7537368 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06248-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effect of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) compared to conventional management in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) performed after Jan 1, 2000 comparing ECMO to conventional management in patients with severe ARDS. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Primary analysis was by intent-to-treat. RESULTS We identified two RCTs (CESAR and EOLIA) and combined data from 429 patients. On day 90, 77 of the 214 (36%) ECMO-group and 103 of the 215 (48%) control group patients had died (relative risk (RR), 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-0.94; P = 0.013; I2 = 0%). In the per-protocol and as-treated analyses the RRs were 0.75 (95% CI 0.6-0.94) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.68-1.09), respectively. Rescue ECMO was used for 36 (17%) of the 215 control patients (35 in EOLIA and 1 in CESAR). The RR of 90-day treatment failure, defined as death for the ECMO-group and death or crossover to ECMO for the control group was 0.65 (95% CI 0.52-0.8; I2 = 0%). Patients randomised to ECMO had more days alive out of the ICU and without respiratory, cardiovascular, renal and neurological failure. The only significant treatment-covariate interaction in subgroups was lower mortality with ECMO in patients with two or less organs failing at randomization. CONCLUSIONS In this meta-analysis of individual patient data in severe ARDS, 90-day mortality was significantly lowered by ECMO compared with conventional management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Combes
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 75013, Paris, France. .,Service de médecine Intensive-réanimation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICA, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, N75013, Paris, France.
| | - Giles J Peek
- Congenital Heart Center, Shands Children's Hospital, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1421, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Pollyanna Hardy
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Darryl Abrams
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.,Center for Acute Respiratory Failure, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthieu Schmidt
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 75013, Paris, France.,Service de médecine Intensive-réanimation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICA, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, N75013, Paris, France
| | - Agnès Dechartres
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1421, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Diana Elbourne
- Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hausfater P, Hajage D, Bulsei J, Canavaggio P, Lafourcade A, Paquet AL, Arock M, Durand‐Zaleski I, Riou B, Oueidat N. Impact of Point-of-care Testing on Length of Stay of Patients in the Emergency Department: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Study. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27:974-983. [PMID: 32621374 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Crowding is a frequent concern in the emergency department (ED). Laboratory point-of-care testing (POCT) has been proposed to decrease patients' length of stay (LOS). Our objective was to determine whether an extended panel of POCT solutions could reduce LOS. METHODS This was a single-center, prospective, open-label, controlled cluster-randomized study. Blood test processing was randomized into 1-week inclusion periods: interventional arm (laboratory analyses performed on POCT analyzers implemented in the ED) or control arm (central laboratory). The primary endpoint was LOS of patients in the ED. Secondary endpoints were time to result (TTR), ED crowding surrogates, and average total cost of an ED visit in each arm. RESULTS A total of 23,231 patients were included and 20,923 were analyzed for the main outcome measure. Mean ± SD age was 46 ± 20 years, and 7,905 (36%) underwent blood sampling. Mean ± SD LOSs were 203 ± 161 and 210 ± 168 minutes in the POCT and control arms, respectively. LOS reduction for the entire ED population was -9 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] = -22 to 5, p = 0.22) compared to the control arm and -17 minutes (95% CI = -34.0 to 0.6, p = 0.06) for patients undergoing blood sampling. The mean ± SD TTRs were 28 ± 31 and 79 ± 34 minutes in the POCT and control arms, respectively (TTR reduction = -51 minutes, 95% CI = -54 to -48 minutes, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The implementation of an extended panel of POCT solutions in an ED did not significantly reduce the LOS, but reduced the TTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Hausfater
- From the Emergency DepartmentHôpital Pitié‐SalpêtrièreAPHP ParisFrance
- the UMR INSERM 1166 IHU ICAN Sorbonne Université, GRC‐14 BIOSFAST ParisFrance
| | - David Hajage
- the Département Biostatistique Santé Publique et Information Médicale Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi) Sorbonne UniversitéAPHP ParisFrance
| | - Julie Bulsei
- the AP‐HP URC Eco Ile de France Hôpital de l'Hôtel Dieu ParisFrance
- the CRESS INSERM INRA Université de Paris ParisFrance
| | | | | | - Anne Laure Paquet
- From the Emergency DepartmentHôpital Pitié‐SalpêtrièreAPHP ParisFrance
| | - Michel Arock
- the Sorbonne Université ParisFrance
- and the Biochemisty and Emergency Biology Department Hôpital Pitié‐SalpêtrièreAPHP Paris France
| | - Isabelle Durand‐Zaleski
- the AP‐HP URC Eco Ile de France Hôpital de l'Hôtel Dieu ParisFrance
- the CRESS INSERM INRA Université de Paris ParisFrance
| | - Bruno Riou
- From the Emergency DepartmentHôpital Pitié‐SalpêtrièreAPHP ParisFrance
- the UMR INSERM 1166 IHU ICAN Sorbonne Université, GRC‐14 BIOSFAST ParisFrance
| | - Nathalie Oueidat
- and the Biochemisty and Emergency Biology Department Hôpital Pitié‐SalpêtrièreAPHP Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bourron O, Phan F, Diallo MH, Hajage D, Aubert CE, Carlier A, Salem JE, Funck-Brentano C, Kemel S, Cluzel P, Redheuil A, Davaine JM, Massy Z, Mentaverri R, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Gillery P, Jaisson S, Vermeer C, Lacorte JM, Bouziri N, Laroche S, Amouyal C, Hartemann A. Circulating Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor kB Ligand and triglycerides are associated with progression of lower limb arterial calcification in type 2 diabetes: a prospective, observational cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2020; 19:140. [PMID: 32948184 PMCID: PMC7501627 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-020-01122-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lower limb arterial calcification is a frequent, underestimated but serious complication of diabetes. The DIACART study is a prospective cohort study designed to evaluate the determinants of the progression of lower limb arterial calcification in 198 patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods Lower limb arterial calcification scores were determined by computed tomography at baseline and after a mean follow up of 31.20 ± 3.86 months. Serum RANKL (Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor kB Ligand) and bone remodeling, inflammatory and metabolic parameters were measured at baseline. The predictive effect of these markers on calcification progression was analyzed by a multivariate linear regression model. Results At baseline, mean ± SD and median lower limb arterial calcification scores were, 2364 ± 5613 and 527 respectively and at the end of the study, 3739 ± 6886 and 1355 respectively. Using multivariate analysis, the progression of lower limb arterial log calcification score was found to be associated with (β coefficient [slope], 95% CI, p-value) baseline log(calcification score) (1.02, 1.00–1.04, p < 0.001), triglycerides (0.11, 0.03–0.20, p = 0.007), log(RANKL) (0.07, 0.02–0.11, p = 0.016), previous ischemic cardiomyopathy (0.36, 0.15–0.57, p = 0.001), statin use (0.39, 0.06–0.72, p = 0.023) and duration of follow up (0.04, 0.01–0.06, p = 0.004). Conclusion In patients with type 2 diabetes, lower limb arterial calcification is frequent and can progress rapidly. Circulating RANKL and triglycerides are independently associated with this progression. These results open new therapeutic perspectives in peripheral diabetic calcifying arteriopathy. Trial registration NCT02431234
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Bourron
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. .,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Diabetology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France. .,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France. .,INSERM, UMR_S 1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris 06, France. .,Diabetology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris, France.
| | - Franck Phan
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Diabetology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France.,INSERM, UMR_S 1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris 06, France
| | - Mamadou Hassimiou Diallo
- Unité de Recherche Clinique Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, 75013, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Département de Santé, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), CIC-1421, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Carole-Elodie Aubert
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Diabetology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Carlier
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Diabetology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France
| | - Joe-Elie Salem
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Department of Pharmacology and CIC-1421, AP-HP La Pitié Salpêtrière Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM, CIC-1901, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France
| | - Christian Funck-Brentano
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Department of Pharmacology and CIC-1421, AP-HP La Pitié Salpêtrière Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM, CIC-1901, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France
| | - Salim Kemel
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale INSERM_1146, CNRS_7371, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Department of Radiology, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Cluzel
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale INSERM_1146, CNRS_7371, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Department of Radiology, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alban Redheuil
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale INSERM_1146, CNRS_7371, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Department of Radiology, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Ziad Massy
- Division of Nephrology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Romuald Mentaverri
- INSERM_1088, Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Dominique Bonnefont-Rousselot
- Department of Metabolic Biochemistry, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France.,UTCBS, CNRS UMR8258 - INSERM_1267, Faculty of Pharmacy of Paris, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Gillery
- University of Reims- Champagne-Ardenne, CNRS, MEDyC UMR 7369, Reims, France.,Laboratory of Biochemisry-Pharmacology-Toxicology, University Hospital of Reims, Maison Blanche Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Stéphane Jaisson
- University of Reims- Champagne-Ardenne, CNRS, MEDyC UMR 7369, Reims, France.,Laboratory of Biochemisry-Pharmacology-Toxicology, University Hospital of Reims, Maison Blanche Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Cees Vermeer
- Cardiovascular Research Institute CARIM, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Marc Lacorte
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Department of Endocrine and Oncologic Biochemistry, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM U1166, Paris, France
| | - Nesrine Bouziri
- Sorbonne University, ACTION Study Group, INSERM, UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Suzanne Laroche
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Diabetology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France
| | - Chloé Amouyal
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Diabetology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France
| | - Agnes Hartemann
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Diabetology Department, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix University Hospital, Paris, France.,Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition ICAN, Paris, France.,INSERM, UMR_S 1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris 06, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bréchot N, Hajage D, Kimmoun A, Demiselle J, Agerstrand C, Montero S, Schmidt M, Luyt CE, Lebreton G, Hékimian G, Flecher E, Zogheib E, Levy B, Slutsky AS, Brodie D, Asfar P, Combes A. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to rescue sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: a retrospective, multicentre, international cohort study. Lancet 2020; 396:545-552. [PMID: 32828186 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30733-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy with cardiogenic shock have a high mortality. This study assessed venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support for sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional treatments. METHODS In this retrospective, multicentre, international cohort study, we compared outcomes of 82 patients (aged ≥18 years) with septic shock who received VA-ECMO at five academic ECMO centres, with 130 controls (not receiving ECMO) obtained from three large databases of septic shock. All patients had severe myocardial dysfunction (cardiac index 3 L/min per m2 or less or left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 35% or less) and severe haemodynamic compromise (inotrope score at least 75 μg/kg per min or lactic acidaemia at least 4 mmol/L) at time of inclusion. The primary endpoint was survival at 90 days. A propensity score-weighted analysis was done to control for confounders. FINDINGS At baseline, patients treated with VA-ECMO had more severe myocardial dysfunction (mean cardiac index 1·5 L/min per m2vs 2·2 L/min per m2, LVEF 17% vs 27%), more severe haemodynamic impairment (inotrope score 279 μg/kg per min vs 145 μg/kg per min, lactataemia 8·9 mmol/L vs 6·5 mmol/L), and more severe organ failure (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score 17 vs 13) than did controls, with p<0·0001 for each comparison. Survival at 90 days for patients treated with VA-ECMO was significantly higher than for controls (60% vs 25%, risk ratio [RR] for mortality 0·54, 95% CI [0·40-0·70]; p<0·0001). After propensity score weighting, ECMO remained associated with improved survival (51% vs 14%, adjusted RR for mortality 0·57, 95% CI [0·35-0·93]; p=0·0029). Lactate and catecholamine clearance were also significantly enhanced in patients treated with ECMO. Among the 49 survivors treated with ECMO, 32 who had been treated at the largest centre reported satisfactory Short Form-36 evaluated health-related quality of life at 1-year follow-up. INTERPRETATION Patients with severe sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO had a large and significant improvement in survival compared with controls not receiving ECMO. However, despite the careful propensity-weighted analysis, we cannot rule out unmeasured confounders. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Bréchot
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Collège de France, Centre of Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS UMR7241, INSERM U1050, Paris, France.
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département Biostatistique Santé Publique et Information Médicale, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France
| | - Antoine Kimmoun
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy and INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Julien Demiselle
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers, Angers, France
| | - Cara Agerstrand
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Centre, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Santiago Montero
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Acute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Cardiology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matthieu Schmidt
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque et Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Hékimian
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Erwan Flecher
- Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Elie Zogheib
- Critical Care Department, Amiens University Hospital, Picardy Jules Verne University, Amiens, France
| | - Bruno Levy
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy and INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Arthur S Slutsky
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Brodie
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Centre, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pierre Asfar
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers, Angers, France
| | - Alain Combes
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|