A prospective, multi-center study: factors related to the management of diabetic foot infections

Identifying multidrug-resistant organisms in diabetic foot ulcers: a study of risk factors and antimicrobial resistance genes

This study aims to evaluate the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of bacterial isolates from DFU patients, identify the prevalence of MDROs, and identify specific risk factors contributing to these infections to inform effective antibiotic treatment strategies. This prospective cohort study included 187 DFU patients from March 2023 to February 2024 at King Khalid Hospital, Saudi Arabia. The exclusion criteria were nondiabetic ulcers, specific infections, tumours, or recent antibiotic use. Data on demographics, diabetes duration, DFU characteristics, and antibiotic history were collected. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. During the 1-year study, 187 DFU patients were included, with 72.7% males and 27.3% females. The mean age of the study participants was 54.9 ± 11.8 years. The average duration of diabetes was 6.3 ± 3.7 years, and the mean HbA1c was 8.0 ± 1.0%. Over half (54.5%) of the patients had Wagner ulcer grade III, and neuropathy (67%) and retinopathy (73%) were the most common complications. Polymicrobial infections were identified in 54% of the cases, with 61.5% of the isolates producing biofilms. The key risk factors for MDR infections included amputation (OR: 5.92), polymicrobial infections (OR: 7.49), biofilm production (OR: 5.00), recent antibiotic use (OR: 3.97), and an ulcer duration > 30 days (OR: 2.23). Sex, age, and weight were not significantly associated with MDR infections. Among the 27 MRSA isolates, 81.5% carried the mecA gene, and 98.8% of the ESBL-producing organisms harboured at least one ESBL gene, with blaCTX-M being the most common (27.2%). Carbapenem resistance was confirmed in 25.6% of the isolates, with blaNDM being the predominant carbapenemase gene (69.3%). Coresistance with ESBL genes was detected in 66.7% of the blaNDM-producing isolates. This study demonstrates a high prevalence of MDROs in DFUs, primarily driven by biofilm-producing polymicrobial infections and resistance genes like blaNDM and blaCTX-M. The findings accentuate the clinical importance of integrating molecular diagnostics for early detection of resistance determinants, enabling precise, targeted therapy. Tailored antibiotic stewardship and enhanced infection control measures are critical to optimizing treatment outcomes, reducing complications, and mitigating the burden of chronic DFUs in healthcare settings.

The Differentiation Between Infection and Acute Charcot

The differentiation between acute Charcot neuroarthropathy and infection in the foot and ankle should be supported by multiple criteria. A detailed history and physical examination should always be completed. Plain radiographs should be performed, though advanced imaging, currently MRI, is more helpful in diagnosis. Scintigraphy and PET may become the standard imaging modalities once they are more clinically available due to their reported increased accuracy. Laboratory analysis can also act as a helpful diagnostic tool. Histopathology with culturing should be performed if osteomyelitis is suspected. The prompt diagnosis and initiation of treatment is vital to reducing patient morbidity and mortality.

Distribution of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in diabetic foot ulcers and risk factors for drug resistance: a retrospective analysis

Objective

To investigate the distribution, drug resistance and risk factors of multi-drug resistant bacterias (MDROs) in patients with Type 2 diabetic foot ulcers (DFU).

Method

The clinical data, foot secretions, pathogenic microorganisms and drug sensitivity tests of 147 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to our department from January 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had been infected with MDROs or not. Seventy-one cases were infected with MDROs as the case group, and the remaining 76 cases were the control group. Chi-square test and t-test were used to analyze the results of MDROs infection and DFU, and logistic multivariate regression was used to evaluate the risk factors of MDROs infection.

Results

A total of 71 strains were isolated from the MDROs-positive group, with the top three being Staphylococcus aureus (46.48%), Escherichia coli (22.53%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.31%), respectively. Logistic multifactorial regression analysis showed that history of previous antimicrobial exposure, neuroischemic wound, Wagner grade 3-5, and combined osteomyelitis were associated with Type 2 diabetic foot infection MDROs (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Previous history of antimicrobial exposure, neuroischemic wounds, Wagner grade 3-5, and combined osteomyelitis are independent risk factors for MDROs, which can identify the risk factors for MDROs at an early stage and help to identify people at high risk of MDROs infection and take relevant comprehensive treatment in time to slow down the development of the disease.

Molecular Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Nasal Cavity and Wound Infections Among Diabetic Patients

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen contributing to diabetic foot infections (DFI). Nasal transmission of S. aureus potentially increases the risk of endogenous infection. The aim of this study was to determine the genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance profile of S. aureus isolates in nasal and wound samples from diabetic patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2018 to September 2019. S. aureus was isolated from the anterior nares and wounds of diabetic patients. All S. aureus isolates were characterized by detection of resistance and virulence genes (mecA, ermA, ermC, hla, hlb, hlg, sea, lukDE, pvl), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec)-typing and staphylococcal protein A (spa)-typing. A total of 34 S. aureus were isolated from the wounds of 115 diabetic patients with DFI. Twenty-four S. aureus isolates were collected from the anterior nares of patients, and thirteen patients had concurrent S. aureus in nasal and wound specimens. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in nasal specimens was noticeable (41.7%), and the most common spa-type in nasal and wound specimens was t14870. Nearly half of the patients with concurrent S. aureus in wound and nasal specimens had similar isolates from both sites. Our data suggest that detection and screening of S. aureus colonization in the nasal cavity may prevent subsequent endogenous infections, particularly with MRSA strains.

Understanding the multifaceted etiopathogenesis of foot complications in individuals with diabetes

Diabetes mellitus, a chronic disease of metabolism, is characterized by a disordered production or cellular utilization of insulin. Diabetic foot disease, which comprises the spectrum of infection, ulceration, and gangrene, is one of the most severe complications of diabetes and is the most common cause of hospitalization in diabetic patients. The aim of this study is to provide an evidence-based overview of diabetic foot complications. Due to neuropathy, diabetic foot infections can occur in the form of ulcers and minor skin lesions. In patients with diabetic foot ulcers, ischemia and infection are the main causes of non-healing ulcers and amputations. Hyperglycemia compromises the immune system of individuals with diabetes, leading to persistent inflammation and delayed wound healing. In addition, the treatment of diabetic foot infections is challenging due to difficulty in accurate identification of pathogenic microorganisms and the widespread issue of antimicrobial resistance. As a further complicating factor, the warning signs and symptoms of diabetic foot problems can easily be overlooked. Issues associated with diabetic foot complications include peripheral arterial disease and osteomyelitis; accordingly, the risk of these complications in people with diabetes should be assessed annually. Although antimicrobial agents represent the mainstay of treatment for diabetic foot infections, if peripheral arterial disease is present, revascularization should be considered to prevent limb amputation. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic patients, including those with foot ulcers, is of the utmost importance to reduce the cost of treatment and avoid major adverse consequences such as amputation.

Bacterial Diversity, Antibiotic Resistance, and the Risk of Lower Limb Amputation in Younger and Older Individuals With Diabetic Foot Infection

INTRODUCTION

A diabetic foot infection (DFI) contributes to high mortality and morbidity in diabetics due to its often rapid progressive and intricately treatable infection. DFIs are usually a polymicrobial infection and characterizing the entire bacterial load is still challenging. Prompt and effective treatment of DFI is nevertheless mandatory to safe limbs and lives. It is therefore crucial to know the local pathogen spectrum and its antibiotic susceptibility.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

For a 12-month period, we investigated 353 individuals with infected diabetic foot ulcer, their bacterial diversity, and antimicrobial susceptibility at fist-time visit in a Diabetic Foot Care Center in southern Germany.

RESULTS

Cultures yielded 888 species, most of them gram-positive cocci (primary Staphylococcus aureus). The gram-negative sector was mainly formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriacae. Because the prevalence of multiresistant species was surprisingly low (0.9% of isolated strains), we suggest penicillins with β-lactamase inhibitor in case of gram-positive-dominated infection or piperacillin/tazobactam or rather carbapenems with equal efficacy when gram-negative species are involved.

Diabetic foot infections: A microbiologic review

Diabetes mellitus continues to be an increasingly common comorbidity. Diabetic foot infections are one of the most common causes of hospitalization in this population, and account for a significant portion of increased hospitalization and healthcare expenditure. Complications, such as osteomyelitis, can necessitate the use of multiple, prolonged antibiotic courses. These courses often consist of broad-spectrum, empiric therapy determined by organisms considered to be commonly associated with these types of infections. Extended periods of broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens can contribute to antibiotic resistance and ultimately limit future treatment options. Furthermore, patient specific risk factors can impact the microbiologic diversity found in these infections. As a result, it is difficult to determine if a single empiric regimen is appropriate for all instances of diabetic foot infections.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

This review analyzes global literature relating to the culture methods, incidence, risk factors, resistance patterns, and geographic distribution of the microorganisms isolated from diabetic foot infections using the PRISMA statement for systematic review and meta-analysis reporting.

RESULTS

Staphylococcus aureus remains a significant pathogen, with a growing incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and MDR gram-negative bacilli.

CONCLUSIONS

Though some individualized risk factors can be useful, local epidemiology and resistance patterns remain essential for antibiotic treatment considerations.

Biodiversity of N-acyl homoserine lactonase (aiiA) gene from Bacillus subtilis

Microorganisms rely on the benefit of using chemical signals called autoinducers (AIs) as a connection matter in term of population, this mechanism is known as quorum sensing (QS). Quorum sensing is responsible for formation of biofilm together with virulence in bacteria. The most known QS molecule is N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs). A lot of degrading enzymes including lactonases that open the AHL ring and acylases that breakdown its acyl side chain can degrade or inactivate AHL. Due to similarity in lactone ring structure among AHLs it is susceptible to most of lactonases. Bacillus species are among the most promising bacteria producing AHL-lactonase. The aim of the work is to identify and study the diversity of the AHL-Lactonase gene among different Bacillus subtilis as a promising Quorum Quenching (QQ) strategy to prevent bacterial infections and biofilm formation. The AHL-lactonase (aiiA) gene of 64 B. subtilis isolates was amplified and sequenced followed by multiple sequence alignment of the translated amino acid sequences, homology modeling and docking study. An expected PCR product of about 750 base pair was detected in 22 B. subtilis isolates, and the results revealed that the isolates' sequences showed identity ranged between 97.61% to 99.47% with those in the NCBI GenBank database with 100% query coverage and 0.0 E-value. In addition, the results revealed high level of identity between many aiiA gene sequences of our isolates as they were closely related to the same sequences to many sequences of the NCBI GenBank database. The alignment of the amino acid sequences from the 22 B. subtilis isolates indicated that 84.4% of the amino acid residues were conserved between the aligned sequences. Docking of the co-crystalized ligand to wildtype and H109Y mutated protein showed a significant reduction of docking score for the mutated protein. This result indicate that this mutation might affect recognition or at least kinetics of these enzymes and hence their roles in quorum-quenching.

The Profile of Microbiological Pathogens in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Diabetic foot, a main complication of diabetes mellitus, renders the foot susceptible to infection, and may eventually lead to non-traumatic limb amputation due to the deterioration of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Characterizing the pathogen spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility is critical for the effective treatment of DFUs. In the current study, the characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility of the pathogen spectrum were analyzed. Secretions from the DFUs of 102 patients were cultured, and dominant pathogens were identified by using test cards. Antibiotic susceptibility of dominant pathogens was assayed by the Kirby–Bauer assay. We found that the dominant pathogens varied with age, duration of diabetes, blood sugar control, and the initial cause of ulcers. Moreover, the dominant pathogens were susceptible to at least one antibiotic. However, the antibacterial efficacy of several commonly used antibiotics decreased from 2016 to 2019. Our study indicates that the identification of dominant pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility testing is essential for the treatment of DFUs with effective antibiotics, while the abuse of antibiotics should be strictly restrained to reduce the generation of antibiotic-resistant strains.

Long-Term Intrahost Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus Among Diabetic Patients With Foot Infections

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the main pathogens isolated from diabetic foot infections (DFI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of the persistence of S. aureus in this environment and the possible modifications of the bacterial genome content over time. Molecular typing of S. aureus isolates cultured from patients with the same DFI over a 7-year study revealed a 25% rate of persistence of this species in 48 patients, with a short median persistence time of 12weeks (range: 4-52weeks). Non-specific clonal complexes were linked to this persistence. During the follow-up, bla genes were acquired in three cases, whereas some virulence markers were lost in all cases after a long period of colonization (21.5weeks). Only one patient (2%) had a long-term persistence of 48weeks. The genome sequencing of a clonal pair of early/late strains isolated in this patient showed mutations in genes encoding bacterial defence and two-component signal transduction systems. Although, this study suggests that the long-term persistence of S. aureus in DFI is a rare event, genomic evolution is observed, highlighting the low adaptive ability of S. aureus to the specific environment and stressful conditions of diabetic foot ulcers. These results provide the basis for better understanding of S. aureus dynamics during persistent colonization in chronic wounds.

Virulence Factor Genes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Blood and Chronic Wounds

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the predominant bacteria isolated from skin and soft tissue infections and a common cause of bloodstream infections. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of resistance to various antimicrobial agents and virulence patterns in a total of 200 S. aureus strains isolated from patients with bacteremia and chronic wounds. Disk diffusion assay and in the case of vancomycin and teicoplanin-microdilution assay, were performed to study the antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates. The prevalence of genes encoding six enterotoxins, two exfoliative toxins, the Panton–Valentine leukocidin and the toxic shock syndrome toxin was determined by PCR. Of the 100 blood strains tested, the highest percentage (85.0%, 31.0%, and 29.0%) were resistant to benzylpenicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin, respectively. Out of the 100 chronic wound strains, the highest percentage (86.0%, 32.0%, 31.0%, 31.0%, 30.0%, and 29.0%) were confirmed as resistant to benzylpenicillin, tobramycin, amikacin, norfloxacin, erythromycin, and clindamycin, respectively. A significantly higher prevalence of resistance to amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin was noted in strains obtained from chronic wounds. Moreover, a significant difference in the distribution of sea and sei genes was found. These genes were detected in 6.0%, 46.0% of blood strains and in 19.0%, and 61.0% of wound strains, respectively. Our results suggest that S. aureus strains obtained from chronic wounds seem to be more often resistant to antibiotics and harbor more virulence genes compared to strains isolated from blood.

Management of diabetic foot infections in the light of recent literature and new international guidelines

Introduction: In May 2019 the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) launched their quadrennially updated guidelines on the management of diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Concomitantly, the number of new publications regarding DFI increased.Areas covered: The IWGDF committee developed and addressed key questions and produced evidence-based recommendations related to diagnosing and treating DFIs. This narrative review provides an overview of this new guideline and also of other recently published literature in the field of DFIs.Expert opinion: The 2019 IWGDF guidelines provide an authoritative, international, evidence-based approach to diagnosing and treating DFIs. The 27 recommendations are supported by systematic reviews of both diagnosis and interventions. Our review of this guideline, along with other recent publications in the field, allows us to offer state-of-the-art guidance for caring for these difficult infections. As the evidence base for management of DFIs remains suboptimal, we need further research to improve the management of DFIs.

Assessment of the Risk Factors of Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infection in Adults With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Foot Ulcer

OBJECTIVES

To our knowledge, this is the first review to analyze the literature identifying risk factors for multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. The purpose of this study was to collect the currently published data to determine the most commonly and consistently identified risk factors for MDRO infection.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched. The last search updated was in September 2019. The evaluated outcomes included age, male sex, type of diabetes, diabetes duration, level of glycated hemoglobin, ulcer type, wound duration, ulcer size, ulcer grade, osteomyelitis, previous antibiotic therapy and previous hospitalization. The standard mean difference or the odds ratio (OR) was calculated for continuous or dichotomous data, respectively. The quality of the studies was assessed, and meta-analyses were performed with Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies, including 1,229 patients provided evidence for 6 possible risk factors for MDRO infection. Ischemic ulcer (OR, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.71), ulcer size (standard mean difference, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.08), ulcer grade (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.83), osteomyelitis (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.45), previous antibiotic therapy (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.14) and previous hospitalization (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.28) were identified as risk factors for MDRO infection in patients with diabetic foot ulcer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that ischemic ulcer, ulcer size, ulcer grade, osteomyelitis, previous antibiotic therapy and previous hospitalization were associated with MDRO infection in patients with diabetic foot ulcer.

Rapamycin Attenuates High Glucose-Induced Inflammation Through Modulation of mTOR/NF-κB Pathways in Macrophages

Background: The NLRP3 inflammasome is one of the key contributors to impaired wound healing in diabetes. In this study, we assessed the role of rapamycin on high glucose-induced inflammation in THP-1-derived macrophages and investigated the underlying signaling mechanisms. Methods: THP-1-derived macrophages were treated with high glucose to induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation. The cells were pretreated with rapamycin, BAY 11-7082, or PDTC before exposure to HG. mTOR, NF-κB, and NLRP3 inflammasome expression were measured by western blotting. Results: We found that rapamycin reduced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages. Rapamycin reduced NLRP3 inflammasome activation by inhibiting mTOR phosphorylation and NF-κB activation. Moreover, mTOR siRNA inhibited NF-κB activation, leading to the suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Conclusion: Rapamycin can ameliorate high glucose-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation by attenuating the mTOR/NF-κB signaling pathway in macrophages. Rapamycin may act as a possible therapeutic option for high glucose-induced inflammatory response in impaired wound healing in the future.

Meta-analysis of risk factors for amputation in diabetic foot infections

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of risk factors is crucial to develop management and treatment protocols for the prevention of lower extremity amputation for patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs).

METHODS

We searched the research literature for studies reporting risk factors for lower extremity amputation in patients with DFI. The main outcome variables included both minor and major amputations. This study was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018118543).

RESULTS

A total of 2471 potential articles from the database search met the inclusion criteria. After reviewing the titles, abstracts, and full texts, remaining 25 articles were included in the final analysis. We identified 6132 patients with DFI in the 25 included articles. Of these, 1873 patients who underwent amputation were investigated. Male gender (odds ratio [OR]: 1.31), smoking (OR: 1.38), history of amputation (OR: 1.47), history of osteomyelitis (OR: 1.94), peripheral arterial disease (OR: 2.35), retinopathy (OR: 1.32), International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) grades 3 and 4 (OR: 1.7 and 2.5), Wagner grades 4 and 5 (OR: 4.3 and 6.4), gangrene/necrosis (OR: 9.9), osteomyelitis (OR: 4.5), neuroischaemic DFI (OR: 3.06), severe infection (OR: 3.12), length of hospitalization (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.7), leukocytosis (OR: 1.76), mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (SMD: 0.5), mean C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD: 0.8), tissue culture positivity (OR: 1.61), and isolation of Gram-negative bacteria from tissue culture (OR: 1.5) were found as predictors of amputation in DFI.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlighted some differences in diabetic foot ulcers and DFIs in terms of risk factors for lower extremity amputation. These data provide detailed information about risk factors for amputations among patients with DFI, thus contributing to the creation of new classification systems for assessment of high-risk patients.

Molecular Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infection

Background & Objective:

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), is one of the most frequent causes for hospitalizations in patients with diabetes. A major problem in the treatment of DFU is the increased-incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The aim of this study was to determine the SCCmec types of MRSA isolates and their epidemiology among patients with diabetes.

Methods:

This study was carried out on 145 diabetic patients with DFUs. The antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) were performed using the disk diffusion method and E-test technique. SCCmec typing was done by multiplex PCR. Moreover, the presence of virulence toxin genes, including pvl and lukED was detected by PCR assay.

Results:

In 145 samples from which S. aureus was predominantly isolated, 19.48% were MRSA. Analysis of MRSA isolates revealed that the most prevalent SCCmec type was type IV (46.7%) followed by type III (30.0%) and type V (20.0%). One strain (3.3%) was untypeable. The prevalence of pvl and lukED was 56.7% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The high prevalence of MRSA in DFUs represents the high levels of antibiotic usage among patients with diabetes. In this study, resistance to other important clinical antibiotics was detected among MRSA isolates. The high proportion of SCCmec type IV and V strains, even in former hospitalized patients, indicates the entrance of these clones to the clinical setting.

Quorum Quenching Lactonase Strengthens Bacteriophage and Antibiotic Arsenal Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates

Many bacteria use quorum sensing (QS), a bacterial communication system based on the diffusion and perception of small signaling molecules, to synchronize their behavior in a cell-density dependent manner. QS regulates the expression of many genes associated with virulence factor production and biofilm formation. This latter is known to be involved in antibiotic and phage resistance mechanisms. Therefore, disrupting QS, a strategy known as quorum quenching (QQ), appears to be an interesting way to reduce bacterial virulence and increase antibiotic and phage treatment efficiency. In this study, the ability of the QQ enzyme SsoPox-W263I, a lactonase able to degrade acyl-homoserine lactones, was investigated for quenching both virulence and biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from diabetic foot ulcers, as well as in the PA14 model strain. These strains were further evolved to resist to bacteriophage cocktails. Overall, 10 antibiotics or bacteriophage resistant strains were evaluated and SsoPox-W263I was shown to decrease pyocyanin, protease and elastase production in all strains. Furthermore, a reduction of more than 70% of biofilm formation was achieved in six out of ten strains. This anti-virulence potential was confirmed in vivo using an amoeba infection model, showing enhanced susceptibility toward amoeba of nine out of ten P. aeruginosa isolates upon QQ. This amoeba model was further used to demonstrate the ability of SsoPox-W263I to enhance the susceptibility of sensitive and phage resistant bacteria to bacteriophage and antibiotic.

What Is the Best Method to Differentiate Acute Charcot Foot From Acute Infection?

RECOMMENDATION

Differentiation between acute Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) and acute infection/osteomyelitis is complex and requires multiple (>1) diagnostic criteria. These criteria include an emphasis on the presence of neuropathy, history, and physical examination. The absence of skin wounds and resolution of swelling/erythema with elevation makes the likelihood of infection very low. In unclear cases, laboratory testing, histologic examination and culturing of bone specimens, scintigraphy, and imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may be of benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Moderate.

DELEGATE VOTE

Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus).

Development of predictive nomograms for clinical use to quantify the risk of isolating resistance prone organisms in patients with infected foot ulcers

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been considered prevalent pathogens in foot infections. However, whether empiric therapy directed against these organisms is necessary, and in whom to consider treatment, is rather unclear. The aim of this study was to develop predictive algorithms for forecasting the probability of isolating these organisms in the infected wounds of patients in a population where the prevalence of resistant pathogens is low. This was a retrospective study of regression model-based risk factor analysis that included 140 patients who presented with infected, culture positive foot ulcers to two urban hospitals. A total of 307 bacteria were identified, most frequently MRSA (11.1%). P. aeruginosa prevalence was 6.5%. In the multivariable analysis, amputation (odds ratio (OR) 5.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-27.63), renal disease (OR 5.46, 95% CI 1.43-25.16) and gangrene (OR 2.78, 95% CI 0.82-9.59) were identified as risk factors associated with higher while diabetes (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.34) and Infectious Diseases Society of America infection severity >3 (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03-0.65) were associated with lower odds of P. aeruginosa isolation (C statistic 0.81). Similar analysis for MRSA showed that amputation was associated with significantly lower (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.79) risk, while history of MRSA infection (OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.56-20.63) and osteomyelitis (OR 2.523, 95% CI 1.00-6.79) was associated with higher odds of isolation (C statistic 0.69). We developed two predictive nomograms with reasonable to strong ability to discriminate between patients who were likely of being infected with P. aeruginosa or MRSA and those who were not. These analyses confirm the association of some, but also question the significance of other frequently described risk factors in predicting the isolation of these organisms.

Influence of multidrug resistant organisms on the outcome of diabetic foot infection

OBJECTIVES

We described the clinical outcomes of the diabetic patients who had foot infections with multidrug resistant organisms.

METHODS

We included the patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI) from 19 centers, between May 2011 and December 2015. Infection was defined according to IDSA DFI guidelines. Patients with severe infection, complicated moderate infection were hospitalized. The patients were followed-up for 6 months after discharge.

RESULTS

In total, 791 patients with DFI were included, 531(67%) were male, median age was 62 (19-90). Severe infection was diagnosed in 85 (11%) patients. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in 291(36.8%) patients. 536 microorganisms were isolated, the most common microorganisms were S. aureus (20%), P. aeruginosa (19%) and E. coli (12%). Methicillin resistance (MR) rate among Staphylococcus aureus isolates was 31%. Multidrug resistant bacteria were detected in 21% of P. aeruginosa isolates. ESBL (+) Gram negative bacteria (GNB) was detected in 38% of E. coli and Klebsiella isolates. Sixty three patients (8%) were re-hospitalized. Of the 791 patiens, 127 (16%) had major amputation, and 24 (3%) patients died. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors for fatality were; dialysis (OR: 8.3, CI: 1.82-38.15, p=0.006), isolation of Klebsiella spp. (OR:7.7, CI: 1.24-47.96, p=0.028), and chronic heart failure (OR: 3, CI: 1.01-9.04, p=0.05). MR Staphylococcus was detected in 21% of the rehospitalized patients, as the most common microorganism (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among rehospitalized patients, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus infections was detected as the most common agent, and Klebsiella spp. infections were found to be significantly associated with fatality.

Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetic foot infection: a prospective study

There is a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Some of them are too difficult to be applied in routine clinical approach. In the routine clinical approach, it is necessary to find new risk factors and end up with a quick and easy assessment of DFIs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the independent risk factors for osteomyelitis, amputation and major amputation in patients with DFI using standard scoring procedures. We prospectively studied 379 patients with DFI. The variables were analysed using logistic analysis. A total of 126 cases (33·2%) underwent amputation. The odds ratios in the amputation model were 3·09 for osteomyelitis (P < 0·001), 4·90 for arterial stenosis (AS) (P < 0·001), 3·67 for the history of DFI (P = 0·001), 2·47 for ulcer duration >60 days (P = 0·001), 3·10 for ulcer depth > 15 mm (P < 0·001) and 10·28 for fungal DFI (P = 0·015). In this study, the unusual result of well-known literature was fungal DFI as an independent risk factor for amputation in patients with DFI.

[Pathogen analysis in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the characteristics of pathogenic microorganisms in the infected bone tissues in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing to facilitate rapid and accurate detection of pathogens and effective infection control.

METHODS

Between September, 2016 and April, 2017, 16 patients with DFO were admitted in our department and infected bone specimens were obtained during debridement. The pathogenic microorganisms in the specimens were identified using both 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing and automatic blood culture analyzer, and the characteristics of the microflora were analyzed based on 16S rRNA sequencing data in comparison with the results of blood culture.

RESULTS

The results of 16S rRNA sequencing showed that bone tissues of DFO contained diverse and uniformly distributed pathogenic organisms, among which 20 (87%) dominant genera were identified with Prevotella as the most abundant pathogen. Both 16S rRNA sequencing and routine culture results suggested the domination of gram-negative bacteria among the pathogens in DFO bone tissues. 16S rRNA sequencing, compared with routine culture, yielded a higher positivity rate (100% vs 88.24%) and detected a greater average number of pathogens (12.56 vs 1.50) and a higher proportion of gram-negative bacteria (67.16% vs 50.00%) in the samples. 16S rRNA sequencing detected nearly all the pathogens identified by routine culture except for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloaca, and identified 13 genera that failed to be detected by routine culture, including the obligate or strict anaerobes Anaerococcus, Veillonella, Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Finegoldia, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, Parvimonas, Peptoniphilus and Bulleidia. Routine culture did not detect any anaerobes in the samples but identified multidrug-resistant strains in as many as 58.33% of the pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing is capable of demonstrating the diversity and abundance of microflora in DFO bone tissues, where diverse and uniformly distributed pathogens can be detected with a discrete distribution of the dominant genera, most of which are gram-negative. Compared with routine culture method, 16S rRNA sequencing allows more convenient and accurate identification of the pathogens (especially gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes), and can be useful in clinical decision on appropriate treatment of DFO.

Risk Factors for Infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Diabetic Foot Infections

BACKGROUND

Selecting empirical therapy for a diabetic foot infection (DFI) requires knowing how likely infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is in a particular patient. We designed this study to define the risk factors associated with P aeruginosa in DFI.

METHODS

We performed a preplanned microbiological subanalysis of data from a study assessing the effects of treatment with intralesional epidermal growth factor for diabetic foot wounds in patients in Turkey between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013. Patients were screened for risk factors, and the data of enrolled individuals were recorded in custom-designed patient data forms. Factors affecting P aeruginosa isolation were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, with statistical significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

There were 174 patients enrolled in the main study. Statistical analysis was performed in 90 evaluable patients for whom we had microbiological assessments. Cultures were sterile in 19 patients, and 89 bacterial isolates were found in the other 71. The most frequently isolated bacteria were P aeruginosa (n = 23, 25.8%) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 12, 13.5%). Previous lower-extremity amputation and a history of using active wound dressings were the only statistically significant independent risk factors for the isolation of P aeruginosa in these DFIs.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study provides some information on risk factors for infection with this difficult pathogen in patients with DFI. We need prospective studies in various parts of the world to better define this issue.

Virulence genes fliC, toxA and phzS are common among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from diabetic foot infections

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of antibiotic treatment of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) may depend not only on the antimicrobial susceptibility of the aetiologic agents, but also their ability to produce virulence factors. This study aimed to use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primers to investigate the presence of virulence genes among isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates cultured from specimens from diabetic foot and other infections.

METHODS

We examined 63 P. aeruginosa isolates from inpatients at two University Hospitals for the presence of 23 known bacterial virulence genes, including lasI, lasR, lasA, lasB, rhll, rhlR, rhlAB, aprA, fliC, toxA, plcH, plcN, ExoS, ExoT, ExoU, ExoY, phzI, phzII, phzM, phzS, pvdA, pilA and pilB.

RESULTS

Seven virulence genes (lasl, lasR, lasB, rhll, rhlR, rhlABand Exo T) were present in each isolate. No isolate expressed or presented aprA gene. We found that fliC (p = .01), toxA (p = .041) and phzS (p < .001) were statistically and significantly more common in diabetic foot isolates, while plcH (p < .001) was significantly more common in other infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Among clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from patients with DFIs, three virulence genes that can play important roles in tissue penetration (fliC), tissue damage and survival under anaerobic condition (phzS) and cell death (toxA) were significantly more common than isolates from other infections. The Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of diabetic foot isolates failed to point/indicate the existence of a specific clone or was not able to characterize/identify a specific clone/clonal complex group. Development of new agents to inhibit the synthesis of these genes may improve outcomes in DFIs treatment.

Charcot Arthropathy Versus Osteomyelitis: Evaluation and Management

Charcot arthropathy of the foot and ankle is a severe complication of peripheral neuropathy and is most commonly seen in the developed world in association with diabetes mellitus. Correct diagnosis and differentiation from osteomyelitis of the foot and ankle are critical to guide treatment. It can exist concomitantly with osteomyelitis, typically in the setting of an advanced midfoot ulcer. Simple plain radiographs and contrasted MRI studies often yield inconclusive or confusing data. Correct use of imaging studies and a clinical algorithm can be effective tools to help make accurate and early diagnoses and guide clinical interventions for these conditions.

An Assessment of Intralesional Epidermal Growth Factor for Treating Diabetic Foot WoundsThe First Experiences in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Intralesional epidermal growth factor (EGF) has been available as a medication in Turkey since 2012. We present the results of our experience using intralesional EGF in Turkey for patients with diabetic foot wounds.

METHODS

A total of 174 patients from 25 Turkish medical centers were evaluated for this retrospective study. We recorded the data on enrolled individuals on custom-designed patient follow-up forms. Patients received intralesional injections of 75 μg of EGF three times per week and were monitored daily for adverse reactions to treatment. Patients were followed up for varying periods after termination of EGF treatments.

RESULTS

Median treatment duration was 4 weeks, and median frequency of EGF administration was 12 doses. Complete response (granulation tissue >75% or wound closure) was observed in 116 patients (66.7%). Wounds closed with only EGF administration in 81 patients (46.6%) and in conjunction with various surgical interventions after EGF administration in 65 patients (37.3%). Overall, 146 of the wounds (83.9%) were closed at the end of therapy. Five patients (2.9%) required major amputation. Adverse effects were reported in 97 patients (55.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with diabetic foot ulcer who received standard care, additional intralesional EGF application after infection control provided high healing rates with low amputation rates.

Cost of illness among patients with diabetic foot ulcer in Turkey

AIM

To evaluate the annual cost of patients with Wagner grade 3-4-5 diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) from the public payer’s perspective in Turkey.

METHODS

This study was conducted focused on a time frame of one year from the public payer’s perspective. Cost-of-illness (COI) methodology, which was developed by the World Health Organization, was used in the generation of cost data. By following a clinical path with the COI method, the main total expenses were reached by multiplying the number of uses of each expense item, the percentage of cases that used them and unit costs. Clinical guidelines and real data specific to Turkey were used in the calculation of the direct costs. Monte Carlo Simulation was used in the study as a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The following were calculated in DFU treatment from the public payer’s perspective: The annual average per patient outpatient costs $579.5 (4.1%), imaging test costs $283.2 (2.0%), laboratory test costs $284.8 (2.0%), annual average per patient cost of intervention, rehabilitation and trainings $2291.7 (16.0%), annual average per patient cost of drugs used $2545.8 (17.8%) and annual average per patient cost of medical materials used in DFU treatment $735.0 (5.1%). The average annual per patient cost for hospital admission is $7357.4 (51.5%). The average per patient complication cost for DFU is $210.3 (1.5%). The average annual per patient cost of DFU treatment in Turkey is $14287.70. As a result of the sensitivity analysis, the standard deviation of the analysis was $5706.60 (n = 5000, mean = $14146.8, 95%CI: $13988.6-$14304.9).

CONCLUSION

The health expenses per person are $-PPP 1045 in 2014 in Turkey and the average annual per patient cost for DFU is 14-fold of said amount. The total health expense in 2014 in Turkey is $-PPP 80.3 billion and the total DFU cost has a 3% share in the total annual health expenses for Turkey. Hospital costs are the highest component in DFU disease costs. In order to prevent DFU, training of the patients at risk and raising consciousness in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) will provide benefits in terms of economy. Appropriate and efficient treatment of DM is a health intervention that can prevent complications.

Optimising the quality and outcomes of treatments for diabetic foot infections

INTRODUCTION

Infection is the commonest foot complication that arises in people with diabetes and may lead to amputation and even death. The emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria, especially in Gram negative rods, may have a negative impact on the chances of cure in these patients.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the Medline and Pubmed databases for studies using the keywords 'diabetic foot infection' and 'diabetic foot osteomyelits' from 1980 to 2016. Expert commentary: Much has been done in the field of diabetic foot infection regarding pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. The construction of multidisciplinary teams is probably the most efficient way to improve the patients' outcome. The rational use of antibiotics and surgical skills are essential in these potentially severe infections. Each case of diabetic infection deserves to be discussed in the light of the current guidelines and the local resources. Because of the overal poor outcome of these infections, prevention remains a priority.

Staphylococcus aureus Toxins and Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Role in Pathogenesis and Interest in Diagnosis

Infection of foot ulcers is a common, often severe and costly complication in diabetes. Diabetic foot infections (DFI) are mainly polymicrobial, and Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequent pathogen isolated. The numerous virulence factors and toxins produced by S. aureus during an infection are well characterized. However, some particular features could be observed in DFI. The aim of this review is to describe the role of S. aureus in DFI and the implication of its toxins in the establishment of the infection. Studies on this issue have helped to distinguish two S. aureus populations in DFI: toxinogenic S. aureus strains (harboring exfoliatin-, EDIN-, PVL- or TSST-encoding genes) and non-toxinogenic strains. Toxinogenic strains are often present in infections with a more severe grade and systemic impact, whereas non-toxinogenic strains seem to remain localized in deep structures and bone involving diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Testing the virulence profile of bacteria seems to be a promising way to predict the behavior of S. aureus in the chronic wounds.

Predictors for limb loss among patient with diabetic foot infections: an observational retrospective multicentric study in Turkey

We aimed to investigate the predictors for limb loss among patients with diabetes who have complicated skin/soft-tissue infections. In this observational study, consecutive patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) from 17 centres in Turkey, between May 2011 and May 2013 were included. The Turkish DFI Working Group performed the study. Predictors of limb loss were investigated by multivariate analysis. In total, 455 patients with DFI were included. Median age was 61 years, 68% were male, 65% of the patients were hospitalized, 52% of the patients had used antibiotics within the last month, and 121 (27%) had osteomyelitis. Of the 208 microorganisms isolated, 92 (44.2%) were Gram-positive cocci and 114 (54.8%) were Gram-negative rods (GNR). The most common GNR was Pseudomonas; the second was Escherichia coli, with extended spectrum β-lactamase positivity of 33%. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species were found in 14% (29/208). Amputations were performed in 126/455 (28%) patients, 44/126 (34%) of these were major amputations. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors for limb loss were, male gender (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.04-2.96, p 0.034), duration of diabetes >20 years (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.18-3.11, p 0.008), infected ulcer versus cellulitis (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.11-3.18, p 0.019), history of peripheral vascular disease (OR 2, 95% CI 1.26-3.27, p 0.004), retinopathy (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.19-4.25, p 0.012), erythrocyte sedimentation rate >70 mm/hr (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.01-2.68, p 0.05), and infection with GNR (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.08-3.02, p 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that, besides the known risk factors such as male gender, duration of diabetes >20 years, infected ulcers, history of peripheral vascular disease and retinopathy, detection of GNR was a significant predictor of limb loss.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an uncommon cause of diabetic foot infection

BACKGROUND

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has traditionally been considered a common pathogen in diabetic foot infection (DFI), yet the 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline for DFI states that "empiric therapy directed at P aeruginosa is usually unnecessary." The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of P aeruginosa isolated from bone or tissue cultures from patients with DFI.

METHODS

This study is a cross-sectional survey of diabetic patients presenting with a foot infection to an urban county hospital between July 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013. All of the patients had at least one debridement procedure during which tissue or bone cultures from operative or bedside debridements were obtained. The χ(2) test and the t test of means were used to determine relationships between variables and the frequency of P aeruginosa in culture.

RESULTS

The median number of bacteria isolated from DFI was two. Streptococcus spp and Staphylococcus aureus were the most commonly isolated organisms; P aeruginosa was isolated in only five of 112 patients (4.5%). The presence of P aeruginosa was not associated with the patient's age, glycosylated hemoglobin level, tobacco abuse, the presence of osteomyelitis, a prescription for antibiotic drugs in the preceding 3 months, or the type of operative procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was an infrequent isolate from DFI in this urban, underserved diabetic population. The presence of P aeruginosa was not associated with any measured risk factors. By introducing a clinical practice guideline, we hope to discourage frontline providers from using routine antipseudomonal antibiotic drugs for DFI.

Combining autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells with fibroblast growth factor therapy along with stringent infection control leading to successful limb salvage in diabetic patient with chronic renal failure and severe toe gangrene

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common complication of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and often culminates in amputation of the affected foot. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections associated with PAD are difficult to treat due to their multi-drug resistance. Herein we report a 38 year old male who reported with DM, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and rest pain of the right second toe in October 2011. He underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) which was unsuccessful. The gangrene of the toes worsened and amputation of the right second toe was done. Bacteriological examination showed presence of P. aeruginosa which during the course of antibiotic therapy became multi-drug resistant. Gangrene and abscess of the foot worsened and amputation of the right third toe was performed. Then autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMNC) therapy was performed but as infection control could not still be achieved, the fourth toe was amputated. A protocol of foot bath using carbonic water, local usage of antibiotics (Polymyxin-B), and basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) spray was then employed after which the infection could be controlled and improvement in vascularity of the right foot could be observed in angiography. This combined approach after proper validation could be considered for similar cases.

Clinical Outcomes of Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection and the Relationship With Type III Secretion System in Patients With Diabetic Foot

The objective was to analyze the clinical outcomes of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) infection and determine the relationship between type III secretion system (TTSS) and MDRPA in diabetic foot (DF) patients. A total of 117 patients infected with P aeruginosa were recruited and grouped into MDRPA and non-MDRPA group according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. TTSS genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Potential risk factors for MDRPA infection were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. Clinical outcomes were compared on the basis of MDRPA or TTSS virulence gene. Previous antibiotic therapy, previous hospitalization and osteomyelitis were associated with MDRPA infection. MDRPA group had a higher amputation/toe rate (32.6% vs 16.2%) and lower healing rate (20.9% vs 41.9%) than non-MDRPA group ( P = .032). A significantly higher proportion of exoU was present in MDRPA group (75.0% vs 25.0%, P < .05) than non-MDRPA group. Patients infected with exoU isolates had a lower healing rate and higher amputation/toe rate (25.0% vs 65.2%, 33.3% vs 8.7%, P < .05) than infected with exoS isolates. The exoU gene was predominance among MDRPA strains. The poor clinical outcomes of MDRPA infection in patients with DF were attributable to exoU gene.

Osteomyelitis: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND

To analyze the incidence and clinical-microbiological characteristics of osteomyelitis (OM) in a tertiary Spanish hospital.

METHODS

All cases diagnosed with OM between January 2007 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The variables examined include epidemiological characteristics, risk factors, affected bone, radiographic changes, histology, microbiological culture results, antibiotic treatment, and the need for surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-three cases of OM were diagnosed. Twenty-six patients (41.3%) had acute OM whereas 37 patients (58.7%) were classified as chronic OM. OM may result from haematogenous or contiguous microbial seeding. In this group, 49 patients (77.8%) presented with OM secondary to a contiguous source of infection and 14 patients had hematogenous OM (22.2%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly found microorganism.

CONCLUSIONS

OM mainly affected patients with risk factors related to the presence of vascular diseases. Antibiotic treatment must be guided by susceptibility patterns of individual microorganisms, although it must be performed together with surgery in most of the cases.

Osteomyelitis or Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy? Differentiating these disorders in diabetic patients with a foot problem

Both osteomyelitis and Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN) are potentially limb-threatening complications of diabetic neuropathy, but they require quite different treatments. Almost all bone infections in the diabetic foot originate from an infected foot ulcer while diabetic osteoarthropathy is a non-infectious process in which peripheral neuropathy plays the critical role. Differentiating between diabetic foot osteomyelitis and CN requires careful evaluation of the patient, including the medical history, physical examination, selected laboratory findings, and imaging studies. Based on available studies, we review the approaches to the diagnostic differentiation of osteomyelitis from CN of the foot in diabetic patients.

Diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis: efficacy of combined surgical and medical treatment

Diabetic foot infections are a high risk for lower extremity amputation in patients with dense peripheral neuropathy and/or peripheral vascular disease. When they present with concomitant osteomyelitis, it poses a great challenge to the surgical and medical teams with continuing debates regarding the treatment strategy. A cohort prospective study conducted between October 2005 and October 2010 included 330 diabetic patients with osteomyelitis mainly involving the forefoot (study group) and 1,808 patients without foot osteomyelitis (control group). Diagnosis of osteomyelitis was based on probing to bone test with bone cultures for microbiological studies and/or repeated plain radiographic findings. Surgical treatment included debridement, sequestrectomy, resections of metatarsal and digital bones, or toe amputation. Antibiotics were started as empirical and modified according to the final culture and sensitivities for all patients. Patients were followed for at least 1 year after wound healing. The mean age of the study group was 56.7 years (SD = 11.4) compared to the control group of 56.3 years (SD = 12.1), while the male to female ratio was 3:1. At initial presentation, 82.1% (n=271) of the study group had an ulcer penetrating the bone or joint level. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (33.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (32.2%), and Escherichia coli (22.2%) with an almost similar pattern in the control group. In the study group, wound healing occurred in less than 6 months in 73% of patients compared to 89.9% in the control group. In the study group, 52 patients (15.8%) had a major lower extremity amputation versus 61 in the control group (3.4%) (P=0.001). During the postoperative follow-up visits, 12.1% of patients in each group developed wound recurrence. In conclusion, combined surgical and medical treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis can achieve acceptable limb salvage rate and also reduce the duration of time to healing along with the duration of antibiotic treatment and wound recurrence rate.