Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection and impact of testing

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains challenging as it involves in the first instance recognition (clinical awareness) of the patients' symptoms for clinical suspicion of CDI to warrant testing, and secondly, different laboratory tests have been described for CDI. Due to the overwhelming amount of information in the literature on CDI tests and their performance, with separately published guidelines, this review aims to provide a comprehensive but concise summary of the current state of CDI diagnostic testing. Current knowledge and the impact of using different laboratory diagnostic procedures for CDI, including the most recommended approach as a two-step algorithm and the concept of diagnostic stewardship, are being discussed. This review provides an updated overview and valuable take-home messages in the field of CDI laboratory testing and highlights that timely diagnosis is important for the clinical management of CDI and that the recommended testing procedures are increasingly becoming more widely accepted.

Comparative evaluation of the STANDARD M10 and Xpert C. difficile assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile in stool specimens

This study compared the performance of two commercial molecular assays, the STANDARD M10 Clostridioides difficile assay (M10) and the Xpert C. difficile assay (Xpert), for detecting toxigenic C. difficile in stool specimens. A total of 487 consecutive stool specimens submitted for routine C. difficile testing between June and November 2023 were included. Following routine testing using C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QCC), M10 and Xpert were tested in parallel, alongside toxigenic culture (reference standard). Additionally, two-step algorithms, using QCC on the first step and either M10 or Xpert on the second step, were assessed. Both M10 and Xpert demonstrated a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. M10 exhibited significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value (PPV; 91.9% and 64.2%, respectively) than Xpert (90.3% and 59.8%, respectively). Both two-step algorithms showed a sensitivity and NPV of 98.4% and 99.8%, respectively. The specificity and PPV of the two-step algorithm using M10 (95.2% and 75.0%, respectively) were slightly higher than those of the one using Xpert (94.8% and 73.2%, respectively), without statistical significance. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, assessing the predictive ability of cycle threshold (Ct) values for the detection of free toxin, exhibited an area under the curve of 0.825 for M10 and 0.843 for Xpert. This indicates the utility of Ct values as predictors for the detection of free toxin in both assays. In conclusion, M10 proves to be an effective diagnostic tool with performance comparable to Xpert, whether utilized independently or as part of a two-step algorithm.

A profile of the GenePOC Carba C assay for the detection and differentiation of gene sequences associated with carbapenem-non-susceptibility

The novel GenePOC/Revogene Carba C assay (GenePOC, Québec, Canada; now Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) is a CE-IVD marked, FDA-approved qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of genes associated with carbapenem-non-susceptibility. Colonies of Enterobacterales can be directly tested without prior DNA isolation. The test consists of a fluorescent-based real-time PCR assay that runs on the centripetal microfluidic revogene platform, providing results within 70 minutes. The assay was evaluated in two studies comprising a total of 294 molecularly characterized clinical Enterobacterales isolates. The overall sensitivity for the detection of carbapenemase gene sequences with the GenePOC assay was 100% (95% CI, 98.4% to 100). Besides the common KPC, VIM, NDM and OXA-48-like carbapenemase genes, also the very variable IMP variants were all detected. The specificity of the assay was 100% (95% CI, 98.8% to 100%). In this article the performance of the GenePOC/Revogene Carba C assay is evaluated and other currently available methods for the detection of carbapenemases are reviewed.