Tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments

Tensile bond strength of soft relining materials to CAD-CAM denture base materials

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the tensile bond strength between soft relining materials and different denture base materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in accordance with ISO 23401:2023. A total of 288 rectangular specimens (10L × 10H × 20W mm) were fabricated from various denture base materials, including a heat-compression polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), two types of milled PMAA, and three types of 3D-printed resins, with bonding using two chairside soft reline materials (Coe-Soft and Lynal). Specimens were placed in distilled water for 24 h before applying tensile force at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The tensile bond strength values (MPa) were calculated at maximum tensile force (N) before failure. Two-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests were used to assess the effect of denture base and soft reline materials on the tensile bond strength (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

A significant difference in the tensile bond strength was found among the different types of denture base materials (p < 0.001), regardless of relining material type. Lynal-relined milled IvoBase demonstrated the highest tensile bond strength (0.5 ± 0.06 MPa), followed by Lynal-relined milled Lucitone (0.44 ± 0.03 MPa), both of which are clinically acceptable as they are equal or greater 0.44 MPa. The lowest tensile bond strength was detected in Lynal-relined 3D printed FotoDent (0.09 ± 0.02 MPa). Lynal exhibited significantly higher tensile bond strength (p < 0.05) than Coe-Soft soft reline material when bonded to PMMA bases; however, there was no significant difference between Lynal and Coe-Soft when bonded to 3D-printed base materials (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tensile bond strength between soft relining materials and denture bases is material-dependent, influenced by both the type of denture base material and the type of soft relining material used.

The effect of various surface treatments on the repair bond strength of denture bases produced by digital and conventional methods

There is limited information on the repairability of prostheses produced with digital technology. This study aims to evaluate various surface treatments on flexural bond strength of repaired dentured base resins produced by digital and conventional methods. A total of 360 samples were prepared from one heat-polymerized, one CAD/CAM milled and one 3D printed denture base materials. All of the test samples were subjected to thermocycling (5-55 °C, 5000 cycles) before and after repair with auto-polymerizing acrylic resin. The test samples were divided into five subgroups according to the surface treatment: grinding with silicon carbide (SC), sandblasting with Al2O3 (SB), Er:YAG laser (L), plasma (P) and negative control (NC) group (no treatment). In addition, the positive control (PC) group consisted of intact samples for the flexural strength test. Surface roughness measurements were performed with a profilometer. After repairing the test samples, a universal test device determined the flexural strength values. Both the surface topography and the fractured surfaces of samples were examined by SEM analysis. The elemental composition of the tested samples was analyzed by EDS. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for statistical analysis of data. SB and L surface treatments statistically significantly increased the surface roughness values of all three materials compared to NC subgroups (p < 0.001). The flexural strength values of the PC groups in all three test materials were significantly higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.001). The repair flexural strength values were statistically different between the SC-SB, L-SB, and NC-SB subgroups for the CAD/CAM groups, and the L-SC and L-NC subgroups for the 3D groups (p < 0.001). The surface treatments applied to the CAD/CAM and heat-polymerized groups did not result in a statistically significant difference in the repair flexural strength values compared to the NC groups (p > 0.05). Laser surface treatment has been the most powerful repair method for 3D printing technique. Surface treatments led to similar repair flexural strengths to untreated groups for CAD/CAM milled and heat-polymerized test samples.

Effect of three-dimensionally printed surface patterns on the peak tensile load of a plasticized acrylic-resin resilient liner

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Stereolithographic (SLA) three-dimensional (3D) printing is considered a reliable manufacturing method for immediate complete dentures. However, studies on the implementation of computer-generated surface patterns to promote the union between printed denture base polymers and dental materials with different chemistries such as plasticized acrylic-resin resilient liners are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of 3D printed surface patterns on the peak tensile load of a short-term plasticized acrylic-resin resilient liner.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 30 denture base specimens (Denture Base LP; FormLabs) were fabricated with 3 adhesive surface designs by using an SLA 3D printer (Forms2; FormLabs). Twenty specimens were designed with surface patterns in the adhesive areas (grid and spheres); 10 specimens comprised each surface pattern group. The remaining specimens were roughened with 220-grit silicon carbide paper and served as a control. A commonly used short-term resilient liner (CoeSoft; GC-America) was applied to the adhesive surface of all the specimens. Subsequently, the specimens were kept in distilled water at 37 °C for 48 hours. The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine, and the resulting peak tensile load data were analyzed by using a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a post hoc Tukey test (α=.05).

RESULTS

The groups with surface patterns on the adhesive surface displayed higher peak tensile load values than the control group. The mean peak tensile load of the grid group was 6.73 ±0.43 N, and that for the spheres group was 6.58 ±0.33 N. The control group displayed the lowest mean peak tensile load (2.71 ±0.51 N). Statistically significant differences were detected between the mean peak tensile loads of the surface pattern groups and the control group (P<.001) No statistically significant difference was found between the mean peak tensile loads of the grid and spheres groups (P=.893).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating surface patterns on the intaglio surface of denture bases made with Denture Base LP via SLA 3D printing can enhance their union to a plasticized acrylic-resin resilient liner. Surface patterns generated higher peak tensile load values than slightly roughening the surface of a 3D printed denture with a 220-grit silicon carbide paper. No significant differences in the mean peak tensile loads were observed between the 2 types of surface patterns.

Adhesive strength of 3 long-term resilient liners to CAD-CAM denture base polymers and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate with thermocycling

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technologies have become popular for manufacturing complete dentures. However, the adhesive strength of resilient liners to the polymers used to fabricate CAD-CAM complete dentures is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the adhesive strength of 3 long-term resilient liners to CAD-CAM denture base polymers and heat-polymerized PMMA with thermocycling.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 90 specimens were fabricated, 30 per group of denture base material (Lucitone 199, Ivo Base CAD, Denture Base LP). For each denture base polymer, 10 specimens were relined with 1 of 3 resilient liners (Permasoft, Mucopren Soft, Molloplast-B). Five specimens of each group were thermocycled, and the other 5 specimens were stored in distilled water. Subsequently, the adhesive strength of the specimens was assessed by tensile testing. The resulting data were analyzed by using a 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α=.05).

RESULTS

After thermocycling, the adhesive strengths of all the resilient liners were found to be statistically different from each other for the same denture base polymer (P≤.012). Mucopren Soft displayed a high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Lucitone 199 (1.78 ±0.32 MPa), followed by Molloplast-B (1.27 ±0.21 MPa) and Permasoft (0.66 ±0.06 MPa). For Ivo Base CAD, Molloplast-B exhibited a high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength (1.70 ±0.36 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (1.11 ±0.16 MPa) and Permasoft (0.53 ±0.04 MPa). Molloplast-B displayed high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Denture Base LP (1.37 ±0.08 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (0.68 ±0.20 MPa) and Permasoft (0.32 ±0.04 MPa). The adhesive strength of the majority of resilient liners not exposed to thermocycling was statistically different from each other for the same type of denture base polymer (P<.001). The only exception was the difference between the adhesive strength of Molloplast-B and Mucopren Soft to Lucitone 199 with mean ±standard deviation values of 1.42 ±0.18 and 1.66 ±0.40 MPa, respectively, (P=.067). Without thermocycling, the mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Lucitone 199 of Permasoft (0.57 ±0.02 MPa) was statistically different from that of Molloplast-B and Mucopren Soft (P<.001). Molloplast-B displayed a high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Ivo Base CAD (1.83 ±0.25 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (1.26 ±0.19 MPa) and Permasoft (0.58 ±0.08 MPa). Molloplast-B displayed a high mean ±standard deviation adhesion to Denture Base LP (1.76 ±0.23 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (0.88 ±0.14 MPa) and Permasoft (0.25 ±0.06 MPa). Only Molloplast-B was significantly adversely affected by thermocycling (P=.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Molloplast-B displayed high adhesive strength to both CAD-CAM denture base polymers regardless of the storage conditions. Mucopren Soft displayed high adhesion to Lucitone 199. Permasoft presented moderate adhesion to PMMA-based denture bases and low adhesion to DBLP. Combining Permasoft with Denture Base LP should be considered carefully and limited to short-term use. Thermocycling had a detrimental effect on the adhesive strength of Molloplast-B.

Application of Laser Treatment in Adhesive Bonding of Liners to Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the influence of laser treatment on adhesive bonding of liners to polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resins. Methods: The focused question was: "Does the application of laser treatment (Intervention) influence the adhesive bonding strength (Outcome) of liners to PMMA denture base resins (Population) as compared with untreated or unconditioned surfaces (Control)?" In vitro and clinical reports as well as reports on influence of laser treatments on bonding strength of liners to PMMA denture resins in comparison with untreated surfaces were included. Reports without any control group[s], without any application of laser[s] for PMMA denture bases that did not utilize PMMA denture bases, and not evaluate bond strength of PMMA denture base resins were excluded. An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Meta-analyses were performed for calculating the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: Nine of the 12 included studies found that laser irradiation treatment produced significant surface texture alterations of the PMMA denture base and improved the adhesion between the PMMA denture base and soft lining. According to the meta-analysis, tensile bond strength showed an SMD of -2.49% (95% CI: -3.89 to -1.08; p = 0.0005), suggesting a statistically significant difference between the control and test groups (i.e., favoring laser-treated samples than untreated samples). Regarding shear bond strength scores, the outcomes showed an SMD of -2.24% (95% CI: -3.79 to -0.69; p = 0.005), suggesting a statistically significant difference between the control and test groups (i.e., favoring laser-treated samples than untreated samples). Conclusions: Despite the high heterogeneity among the included studies, it can be concluded that laser treatment might improve the bonding strengths of liners to PMMA denture base resins as compared with untreated surfaces. To validate the aforementioned conclusions, further verification is required through the implementation of well-designed randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes.

The Effect of Sandblasting on Bond Strength of Soft Liners to Denture Base Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sandblasting on the bond strength of denture base resin to soft liners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This report follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and OpenGrey databases were searched for in vitro studies that compared sandblasting with no treatment in terms of the tensile, shear, and peel bond strength of resilient lining materials (acrylic-based or silicone-based) to polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin. Based on the outcome, the analysis was carried out in three groups of tensile, shear, and peel bond strength. Subgroup analysis was done for the effect of size of particles on sandblasting, blasting pressure, and type of soft liner whenever possible. Heterogeneity was evaluated among the studies, and meta-analysis was performed with random effect models (p < .05).

RESULTS

After screening, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analyses. No treatment showed significantly higher tensile (p < 0.001) or peel (p=0.04) bond strength, although shear bond strength of sandblasted resin was significantly better (p=0.008). Results of subgroup analyses of particle size favored the control group in 50 µ Al2O3 particle size (p < 0.001). In analyses of blasting pressure, the control group had significantly better tensile bond strength than specimens with blasting pressure ≤1 bar (p < 0.001) while specimens with blasting pressure beyond 1 bar showed significantly more tensile strength than control group (p=0.03). In silicon-based liners, groups without any surface treatment had significantly higher tensile bond strength (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

According to the in vitro studies, sandblasting would not lead to significant increase in bond strength of soft liner to the denture base resin.

Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study

This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (p < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (p = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different.

Effect of argon plasma and Er:YAG laser on tensile bond strength between denture liner and acrylic resin

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The separation of a denture liner from the denture base can be a clinical problem. Different surface treatments to increase the bond have been evaluated, but studies comparing the effect of argon plasma and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser on the bond between acrylic resin and a denture liner are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of argon plasma and Er:YAG laser treatments on the bond strengths of acrylic resin to 2 denture liners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Acron Duo) was bonded to silicone soft-liner materials (Molloplast B, n=30; Mollosil, n=30) to create control specimens (n=10), argon plasma treatment (n=10), and Er:YAG laser treatment (n=10). Silicone liners were polymerized on resin specimens. The tensile bond strength test was performed with a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min with a 10-N load until failure. Data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test and unpaired t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

The laser group showed significantly higher bond strength than the argon plasma group for both Molloplast-B (P=.001) and Mollosil (P<.001). The highest tensile bond strength values were determined in the laser-treated Molloplast-B group (1.325 ±0.119 MPa) while the lowest bond strength values were determined in the Mollosil control group (0.384 ±0.018 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Argon plasma and Er:YAG laser applications increases the tensile bond strength between soft-liner material and resin. Er:YAG laser treatment results in higher bond strength values than treatment with argon plasma for 1 minute.

Denture Liners: A Systematic Review Relative to Adhesion and Mechanical Properties

Purpose

The objective of this systematic review is to compare results concerning the properties of adhesion, roughness, and hardness of dental liners obtained in the last ten years.

Methods

Searches on the databases LILACS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were supplemented with manual searches conducted between February and April of 2018. The inclusion criteria included experimental in vitro and in vivo, clinical, and laboratory studies on resilient and/or hard liners, assessment of hardness, roughness, and/or adhesion to the denture base, and physical/mechanical changes resulting from the disinfection process and changes in liners' composition or application.

Results

A total of 406 articles were identified and, from those, 44 are discussed. Twenty-four studies examined the bond strength, 13 surface roughness, and 19 the hardness. Of these 44 studies, 12 evaluated more than one property. Different substances were used in the attempt to improve adhesion. Considering roughness and hardness, the benefits of sealants have been tested, and the changes resulting from antimicrobial agents' incorporation have been assessed.

Conclusion

Adhesion to the prosthesis base is improved with surface treatments. Rough surfaces and changes in hardness compromise the material's serviceability.

Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Thermocycling on Bond Strength of a Silicone-based Denture Liner to a Denture Base Resin

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of three different surface treatments and thermocycling on the tensile strength of a silicone lining material to denture resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 96 cube-shaped specimens were fabricated using heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin. Three millimeters of the material was cut from the midsection. The specimens were divided into four groups. The bonding surfaces of the specimens in each group received one of the following surface treatments: no surface treatment (control group), airborne particle abrasion with 110 pirn alumina particles (air abrasion group), Er:yttrium aluminum garnet laser irradiation (laser group), and air abrasion + laser. After the lining materials were processed between the two PMMA blocks, each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 12), either stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours or thermocycled between 5 and 55°C for 5,000 cycles. The specimens were tested in tensile and shear strength in a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and Tamhane's post hoc tests (α = 0.05). The mode of failure was determined, and one specimen in each group was examined by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Surface-treated groups demonstrated significantly higher tensile strengths compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Nonetheless, no significant differences were found between surface-treated groups (p > 0.05). The tensile strength was significantly different between thermocycled and water-stored specimens (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Altering the surface of the acrylic denture base resin with air abrasion, laser, and air abrasion + laser increased the tensile strength. Thermocycling resulted in decrease in bond strength of silicone-based liner to surface-treated acrylic resin.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Pretreatment of denture base resins before applying the soft liner materials improves the bond strength. However, thermocycling results in decrease in bond strength of soft denture liner to surface-treated acrylic resin.

Effect of different temporary crown materials and surface roughening methods on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different temporary crown materials (TCMs) and surface roughening methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets.

BACKGROUND DATA

TCMs are widely used during orthodontic treatment in teeth in need of prosthetic treatment, to prevent damage to the final restoration. However, there is no consensus considering the best method for roughening of the surface of TCMs.

METHODS

Five different TCMs [Dentalon Plus-(D), Basworth Trim II-(B), Voco Structure Premium-(V), 3M ESPE Protempt 4-(P), and Revotek LC-(R)] were used in this study. Different surface roughening methods (37% phosphoric acid, sandblasting, and Er:YAG laser) were employed in three subgroups (n=20). The SBS test was used to assess the durability of all groups. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed on a representative specimen in each group.

RESULTS

The highest mean SBS value was observed in group V, followed by groups D and P, regardless of the surface treatment. The lowest SBS values were observed in group B. The laser-irradiated groups had higher SBS values than the sandblasted and acid-etched groups. Furthermore, a significant difference in SBS values was observed between the laser-irradiated group V and all other groups (p<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of the chemical nature of TCMs on the SBS values appeared to be clinically negligible, whereas the type of surface treatments had a significant influence on bond strengths. Er:YAG laser irradiation caused a significant increase in bond strength between the TCMs and orthodontic brackets.

Candida albicans biofilms and MMA surface treatment influence the adhesion of soft denture liners to PMMA resin

The effect of Candida albicans biofilms and methyl methacrylate (MMA) pretreatment on the bond strength between soft denture liners and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin was analyzed. Specimens were prepared and randomly divided with respect to PMMA pretreatment, soft liner type (silicone-based or PMMA-based), and presence or absence of a C. albicans biofilm. Samples were composed of a soft denture liner bonded between two PMMA bars. Specimens (n = 10) were incubated to produce a C. albicans biofilm or stored in sterile PBS for 12 days. The tensile bond strength test was performed and failure type was determined using a stereomicroscope. Surface roughness (SR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis were performed on denture liners (n = 8). Highest bond strength was observed in samples containing a silicone-based soft liner and stored in PBS, regardless of pretreatment (p < 0.01). Silicone-based specimens mostly underwent adhesive failures, while samples containing PMMA-based liners predominantly underwent cohesive failures. The silicone-based specimens SR decreased after 12 days of biofilm accumulation or PBS storage, while the SR of PMMA-based soft liners increased (p < 0.01). The PMMA-based soft liners surfaces presented sharp valleys and depressions, while silicone-based specimens surfaces exhibited more gentle features. In vitro exposure to C. albicans biofilms reduced the adhesion of denture liners to PMMA resin, and MMA pretreatment is recommended during relining procedures.

In vitro comparison of the cytotoxicity and water sorption of two different denture base systems

PURPOSE

Denture base resins have the potential to cause cytotoxicity in vivo, and the mechanical properties of resins are affected by water sorption. There is a correlation between residual monomer and water sorption. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate water sorption and cytotoxicity of light-activated urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) denture base resin compared to a conventional heat-activated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two denture base resins, heat-activated PMMA (Meliodent) and light-activated UDMA (Eclipse), were used in this study. Cytotoxicity (5 × 1 mm(2) ) and water sorption (1 × 1 mm(2) ) specimens were made following the manufacturers' instructions (n = 10). Cytotoxicity tests of denture base resins were performed according to ISO10993-5:1999, and water sorption was evaluated according to ISO 1567:1997. ANOVA tests were employed for evaluating data (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

There was no cytotoxic effect in either the PMMA or UDMA group. In addition, contrary to short-term water storage, a significantly lower water sorption value was shown for UDMA resins compared to PMMA resins in both 3- and 6-month storage periods (p = 0.043 and p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The tested denture base materials adhered to the ISO standards for both cytotoxicity and water sorption. The cytotoxicity of the light-activated UDMA resin tested was statistically similar to that of the heat-activated PMMA resin; however, the UDMA resin exhibited decreased water sorption in long-term water storage.

Peel strength of denture liner to PMMA and polyamide: laser versus air-abrasion

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effect of laser parameters and air-abrasion on the peel strength of silicon-based soft denture liner to different denture resins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens (N=180) were prepared out of three different denture base resins (Rodex, cross-linked denture base acrylic resin; Paladent, heat-cured acrylic resin; Deflex, Polyamide resin) (75 mm × 25 mm × 3 mm). A silicon-based soft denture liner (Molloplast B) was applied to the denture resins after the following conditioning methods: a) Air-abrasion (50 µm), b) Er,Cr:YSGG laser (Waterlase MD Turbo, Biolase Technology) at 2 W-20 Hz, c) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 2 W-30 Hz, d) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 3 W-20 Hz, e) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 3 W-30 Hz. Non-conditioned group acted as the control group. Peel test was performed in a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated visually. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Denture liner tested showed increased peel strength after laser treatment with different parameters (3.9±0.4 - 5.58±0.6 MPa) compared to the control (3.64±0.5 - 4.58±0.5 MPa) and air-abraded groups (3.1±0.6 - 4.46±0.3 MPa), but the results were not statistically significant except for Paladent, with the pretreatment of Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 3 W-20 Hz. Polyamide resin after air-abrasion showed significantly lower peel strength than those of other groups (3.1±0.6 MPa).

CONCLUSION

Heat-cured acrylic resin, PMMA, may benefit from Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment at 3 W-20 Hz irradiation. Air-abrasion of polyamide resins should be avoided not to impair their peel bond strengths to silicon-based soft denture liners.

Shear bond strength of denture teeth to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments

PURPOSE

Debonding of acrylic teeth from the denture base remains a major problem in prosthodontics. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of the two chemically different denture base resins-polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two denture base resins, heat-cured PMMA (Meliodent) and light-activated UDMA (Eclipse), were used in this study. A total of 60 molar acrylic denture teeth were randomly separated into four groups (n = 15), according to surface treatment: acrylic untreated (group AC), Eclipse untreated (group EC), treated with eclipse bonding agent (group EB), and Er:YAG laser-irradiated eclipse (group EL). Shear bond strength test specimens were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions. Specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test by a universal testing machine with a 1 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The highest mean bond strength was observed in specimens of group EB, and the lowest was observed in group EC specimens. A statistically significant difference in shear bond strength was found among all groups (p < 0.001), except between groups EC and EL (p = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

The two chemically different denture base polymers showed different shear bond strength values to acrylic denture teeth. Laser-irradiation of the adhesive surface was found to be ineffective on improving bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to denture base resin. Eclipse bonding agent should be used as a part of denture fabrication with the Eclipse Resin System.