A comparative study of toluidine blue-mediated photodynamic therapy versus topical corticosteroids in the treatment of erosive-atrophic oral lichen planus: a randomized clinical controlled trial

Comparison of the effect of the pulsed Er: YAG laser and topical corticosteroid on erosive oral lichen planus: a randomized clinical controlled trial

The formation mechanism of OLP is very complicated, and its treatment has always been a difficult problem. This study was to explore the feasibility of pulsed Er: YAG laser in the treatment of erosive OLP by comparing its effect with that of Triamcinolone Acetonide ointment(TA) of OLP, in order to provide new ideas for the clinical treatment of erosive OLP. Forty patients who were clinically and histopathologically diagnosed as OLP at the Department of Periodontics and Oral Mucosa Disease of Dalian Stomatological Hospital were selected, all lesions accompanied by erosion. The included patients were randomly divided into two groups: Er: YAG group and TA group, with 20 cases in each group. The visual analogue scale (VAS), mean lesion area, clinical sign score, and function score in both groups were evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, and the recurrence rate of cured patients in both groups was evaluated at 3 months after treatment. Er: YAG laser was superior to TA in relieving pain at 1 week(1.50 ± 0.946 vs. 2.10 ± 0.912, P < 0.05) and improving function at all stages(P < 0.05). But TA was superior to the pulsed Er: YAG laser in promoting the healing of erosive lesions at 2 weeks(0.07 ± 0.223 vs. 0.31 ± 0.549, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence between the two groups(P > 0.05). There is no significant difference between pulsed Er: YAG laser and TA in the treatment of erosive OLP. The use of pulsed Er: YAG laser represents a viable and effective therapeutic option for erosive OLP.

Italian Consensus on the treatment of oral lichen planus

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory condition of uncertain etiology affecting oral mucosae by T-cell mediated chronic inflammation. It affects between 1% and 3% of the global population, predominantly middle-aged adults (50-60 years), with a higher incidence in women. The immune response is thought to target keratinocytes, leading to cell death, particularly through CD8+ T lymphocytes. OLP manifests in various clinical forms, such as reticular, papular, erosive, and atrophic, with the reticular subtype being the most common. Erosive OLP is the most severe, characterized by widespread oral erosions, while atrophic OLP often follows erosive stages, affecting the tongue with a depapillated surface. Currently, no curative treatment exists for OLP, and the management focuses on symptom relief, including reducing pain and discomfort. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach involving dermatologists, oral surgeons, and dentists is often required. For this reason, the scientific community represented in Italy by the Mucosal Diseases Study Group of SIDeMaST (Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology) reports its experience in the management of OLP, providing clinical recommendations for dermatologists based on the latest scientific evidence to optimize the treatment and management of OLP.

Toluidine Blue and Chlorin-e6 Mediated Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Systematic Review

Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are conditions that carry an increased risk of malignant transformation, including oral leukoplakia and oral lichen planus. Current management approaches differ based on each condition's unique etiology and pathophysiology, but all available treatment methods have notable limitations. This has prompted continued efforts to identify more effective therapeutic options. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a minimally invasive yet potent alternative for treating OPMDs. This systematic review examines the efficacy of PDT mediated by toluidine blue and chlorin-e6 (Photolon) in managing OPMDs. Following the PRISMA guidelines, eight relevant studies published between 2010 and 2024 were included. Data on the study design, protocols, light parameters, and photosensitizer characteristics were collected to evaluate treatment outcomes. The reviewed evidence suggests that toluidine-blue- and chlorin-e6-mediated PDT holds promise as a minimally invasive treatment modality for OPMDs, especially for oral lichen planus and oral leukoplakia. Studies indicate its potential as an alternative or adjunct therapy, particularly for symptomatic or refractory oral lichen planus. However, discrepancies in study designs and treatment protocols, coupled with the limited number of trials, impeded direct comparisons. Toluidine-blue- and chlorin-e6-mediated PDT shows significant potential as a therapeutic option for OPMDs. Nonetheless, further investigations-including large-scale randomized controlled trials, standardized treatment guidelines, and the exploration of additional OPMDs beyond oral lichen planus and oral leukoplakia-are necessary in order to fully establish its clinical utility and facilitate widespread adoption.

In Vitro Exploration of Dark Cytotoxicity of Anthocyanin-Curcumin Combination, A Herbal Photosensitizer

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy can be used to treat a variety of lesions noninvasively, including oral cancer. High-power laser therapy has also been used to treat oral squamous cell carcinomas. The two main components of photodynamic treatment are the photosensitizer and the light source. Herbal formulations of photosensitizers are used to mask the disadvantages of other photosensitizers.

METHODOLOGY

A methanol-diluted 25 grams of Punica granatum was used to create an anthocyanin extract using the flash evaporation method. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the first dilution agent for curcumin; later further dilution was done with distilled water. Following that, MCF-7 cells (a cancer cell line) were cultured with the produced samples, and the mono-tetrazolium salt (MTT) assay was used to determine the vitality of the cells.

RESULTS

Cell reduction was significantly evident in all three groups, but the most significant cell death was found in the anthocyanin-curcumin group, at 29%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anthocyanin-curcumin has one of the photophysical properties (dark cytotoxicity) and hence can aid as a photosensitizer.

What can we learn from treatments of oral lichen planus?

Oral lichen planus (OLP), a T-lymphocyte-mediated disease of the oral mucosa, has a complex pathogenesis that involves a number of factors. The disease is characterized by recurrent episodes and requires continuous follow up, and there is no curative treatment available. Erosive lichen planus, among others, has a risk of malignant transformation and requires standardized treatment to control its progression. Different clinical subtypes of oral lichen planus require appropriate treatment. Pharmacological treatments are the most widely available and have the greatest variety of options and a number of novel pharmacological treatments are presented as highlights, including JAK enzyme inhibitors. The second is photodynamic therapy, which is the leading physiological treatment. In addition, periodontal treatment and psychological treatment should not be neglected. In this review, we briefly discuss the most recent developments in therapies for oral lichen planus after summarizing the most widely used clinical treatments, aiming to provide different proposals for future clinical treatment.

Photodynamic Therapy for Eye, Ear, Laryngeal Area, and Nasal and Oral Cavity Diseases: A Review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a promising modality for the treatment of various diseases. This non-invasive approach utilizes photosensitizing agents and light to selectively target and destroy abnormal cells, providing a valuable alternative to traditional treatments. Research studies have explored the application of PDT in different areas of the head. Research is focusing on a growing number of new developments and treatments for cancer. One of these methods is PDT. Photodynamic therapy is now a revolutionary, progressive method of cancer therapy. A very important feature of PDT is that cells cannot become immune to singlet oxygen. With this therapy, patients can avoid lengthy and costly surgeries. PDT therapy is referred to as a safe and highly selective therapy. These studies collectively highlight the potential of PDT as a valuable therapeutic option in treating the head area. As research in this field progresses, PDT may become increasingly integrated into the clinical management of these conditions, offering a balance between effectiveness and minimal invasiveness.

Comparison of photodynamic therapy and corticosteroid therapy in management of oral lichen planus: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as an effective therapy for various dermatology conditions, including oral lichen planus (OLP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PDT in managing OLP and to compare its effectiveness with corticosteroid therapy (CST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing databases such as PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, X-mole, and Dimensions. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that included patients with OLP undergoing treatment with PDT and CST, with no limitations on sample size or patient age.

RESULTS

Out of 197 studies identified, only 8 met the inclusion criteria, involving 210 patients (104 in Group I: PDT, 106 in Group II: CST), with a female to male ratio of 3.75. Three studies reported OLP lesion numbers, six studies described lesion types, and five studies provided lesion location information. The efficacy of both PDT and CST was assessed using lesion size, pain, Thongprasom sign (ThS) scoring, efficacy index (EI), and clinical severity index (CSI). The limited and inconsistent reporting of data hindered to conduct a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT effectively treats OLP lesions, leading to significant symptom reduction and improved functionality. However, limited relevant RCTs and heterogeneous data reporting hinder definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of PDT compared to CTS.

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for the treatment of oral infections: A systematic review

Oral infection is a common clinical symptom. While antibiotics are widely employed as the primary treatment for oral diseases, the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria has necessitated the exploration of alternative therapeutic approaches. One such modality is antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), which utilizes light and photosensitizers. Indeed, aPDT has been used alone or in combination with other treatment options dealing with periodontal disease for the elimination of biofilms from bacterial community to achieve bone formation and/or tissue regeneration. In this review article, in addition to factors affecting the efficacy of aPDT, various photosensitizers, the latest technology and perspectives on aPDT are discussed in detail. More importantly, the article emphasizes the novel design and clinical applications of photosensitizers, as well as the synergistic effects of chemical and biomolecules with aPDT to achieve the complete eradication of biofilms and even enhance the biological performance of tissues surrounding the treated oral area.

Emerging potential of phototherapy in management of symptomatic oral lichen planus: A systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials

Phototherapy incorporating photobiomodulation therapy and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy has been utilised as antioxidants in symptomatic oral lichen planus (OLP) management; however, its role of intervention remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review of CRD42021227788 PROSPERO (an international prospective register of systematic reviews in health and social care) registration number was to oversee and determine phototherapy efficacy in patients with symptomatic OLP, identifying and bridging the literature gaps by proposing recommendations for future studies. A search strategy was developed in consistent with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Various electronic databases were exercised to search for randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Several search engines were employed to analyse a total of 177 studies of which nine included. A wide range of utilised laser and light-emitted diode wavelengths between 630 and 808 nm and irradiance ranged between 10 and 13 mW/cm² were noted. 67% of studies reported a high risk of bias and a high heterogeneity obtained from numerical data for quantitative analysis, therefore meta-analysis was impossible to conduct. Despite inconsistency and diversity in phototherapy parameters, treatment protocols, photosensitiser (type, concentration and method of application) and outcome assessment tools, the majority of the studies showed positive results compared with standard care treatments. Hence, a necessity to perform well-designed RCTs with robust methodology is warranted, after acknowledging the current drawbacks and addressing the suggested recommendations highlighted in our review. Moreover, advanced knowledge in understanding further phototherapy-antioxidants molecular mechanistic in symptomatic OLP is required.

Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of symptomatic oral lichen planus -A systematic review

Background

Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) is a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology characterized by T cell mediated autoimmune response which trigger apoptosis of basal cells of an oral epithelium. Corticosteroids are the primary therapeutic option for symptomatic OLP however treatment of lesions unresponsive to corticosteroids that tend to recur are becoming challenging for the clinicians. Currently photodynamic therapy (PDT) is being explored as a new curative option for reduction of pain and/or burning sensation associated with OLP lesions.

Aims and objective

The aim of this systematic review was to analyse studies from literature on the therapeutic effectiveness of PDT in management of symptomatic OLP unresponsive to corticosteroid therapy.

Methods

The electronic retrieval systems and databases PUBMED [MEDLINE], EMBASE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, and SCIENCE DIRECT were searched independently by two authors for relevant articles from January 2015 till July 2021. Primary studies focussed on the role of PDT in treatment of symptomatic OLP and published in English were included.

Results

Out of the 370 articles, only ten studies met the selection criteria. Included studies demonstrated PDT as an effective alternative modality to treat symptomatic OLP with no drop outs. In all studies, with PDT reduction in lesion size and VAS score was observed during each follow up sessions and after treatment (approx. 12 weeks) when compared to pre-treatment level (p < 0.001). Four studies noted PDT to be more effective than topical corticosteroids in reduction of signs and symptoms of OLP (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In the future, long-term studies on larger population should be conducted to establish the clinical effectiveness in PDT in symptomatic OLP. Studies should take into consideration different sources of light and photosensitizers to determine the ideal parameters of PDT treatment for OLP. Wavelength is the most important factor in all types of photo therapies, so the most appropriate wavelength should be selected to obtain better outcome.

Photodynamic therapy in oral cancer: a review of clinical studies

A significant mortality rate is associated with oral cancer, particularly in cases of late-stage diagnosis. Since the last decades, oral cancer survival rates have only gradually improved despite advances in treatment. This poor success rate is mainly due to the development of secondary tumors, local recurrence, and regional failure. Invasive treatments frequently have a negative impact on the aesthetic and functional outcomes of survivors. Novel approaches are thus needed to manage this deadly disease in light of these statistics. In photodynamic therapy (PDT), a light-sensitive medication called a photosensitizer is given first, followed by exposure to light of the proper wavelength that matches the absorbance band of the photosensitizer. The tissue oxygen-induced cytotoxic free radicals kill tumor cells directly, harm the microvascular structure, and cause inflammatory reactions at the targeted sites. In the case of early lesions, PDT can be used as a stand-alone therapy, and in the case of advanced lesions, it can be used as adjuvant therapy. The current review article discussed the uses of PDT in oral cancer therapy based on recent advances in this field.

Treatment of Reticular Oral Lichen Planus with Photodynamic Therapy: A Case Series

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to clinically evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in treatment of the reticular form of oral lichen planus (OLP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients aged 40-76, with 40 confirmed OLP lesions in total, underwent photodynamic therapy (PDT) following the authors' own protocol, which used 5% 5-aminolevulinic acid as a photosensitizer applied two hours prior to illumination with a diode lamp emitting light at 630 nm and 300 mW. The therapy comprised of 10 weekly illumination sessions and was clinically evaluated between its completion and the end of a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

While the baseline mean size of all 40 lesions was 2.74 ± 3.03 cm², it was 2.97 ± 3.4 cm² for the 30 lesions on the buccal mucosa and 2.02 ± 1.32 cm² for the remaining 10 on the gingiva and tongue. On completion of the therapy, 37 sites improved, including 14 showing complete remission. From that point, the mean size reduction of 56.2% (1.2 ± 1.4 cm²) rose to 67.88% (0.88 ± 1.3 cm²) 12 months later.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that ALA-mediated photodynamic therapy was effective for the reticular form of OLP and may become an optional or complementary treatment.

Photodynamic Therapy, Photobiomodulation and Acetonide Triamcinolone 0.1% in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photobiomodulation (PBM) in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP) in comparison with the use of topical corticosteroids. Material and methods: Sixty patients with OLP were randomized to three groups: group 1 photodynamic therapy applied once a week for four sessions, with orabase cream; group 2 low-power laser application with orabase cream; and group 3 inactive laser with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1%. Patient pain was evaluated, and the Thongprasom severity score, the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), and the Hamilton anxiety and depression scale at one and three months of follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05127083). Results: Pain decreased significantly over time in all groups, though the symptoms relapsed over follow-up at one and three months in group 3. The OHIP-14 score improved significantly in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05), and this improvement was maintained after three months. Lesion resolution evaluated by the Thongprasom score at one month showed significant differences between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.032) and between groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Photodynamic therapy and photobiomodulation once a week for four weeks are safe and non-invasive treatment options, with the important advantage of lacking adverse effects. Further studies are needed to confirm it.

The effectiveness of topical forms of dexamethasone in the treatment of oral lichen planus- A systematic review

The goal of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of dexamethasone compared to other treatments in oral lichen planus (OLP). The literature search used the following inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing dexamethasone and other treatment strategies in patients with OLP. The outcome measures included relief of symptoms, decrement of erosive area size, and changes in quality of life. A computer and manual search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to January 31, 2021. The risk of bias was measured with the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Eight trials with 131 study participants and 132 controls were identified. The following interventions were compared dexamethasone mouthwash, and 5% methylene blue-mediated photodynamic therapy, low-level laser therapy, amlexanox, clobetasol mouthwash, ketoconazole with amitriptyline, and thalidomide 1% paste. The therapeutic outcomes were more advantageous for dexamethasone in comparison with photodynamic therapy (PDT) (2 RCT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Comparable effects were observed for dexamethasone, amlexanox, thalidomide, and PDT (1 RCT). Clobetasol showed more effective action than dexamethasone. Given the small sample sizes, heterogeneity and the few studies included, there is limited evidence to support the selection of treatment for OLP.

Therapeutic strategies for oral lichen planus: State of the art and new insights

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the oral mucosa. Several clinical subtypes of OLP have been reported, including the reticular and erosive one. On the one hand, reticular OLP is usually asymptomatic and is characterized by white streaks surrounded by well-defined erythematous borders. On the other hand, erosive OLP shows ulcerations and erosions surrounded by erythematous mucosa. While reticular OLP is relatively easy to control, erosive OLP is extremely painful and refractory to therapies, limiting the quality of life of the patients. In addition, treating erosive OLP is extremely tricky, and a gold standard treatment has not yet been established. However, several therapeutic approaches have been reported as effective, including systemic corticosteroids, systemic retinoids, and anti-interleukin (IL)-17/anti-IL-23 drugs. Indeed, our group and other several authors reported the effectiveness of anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, and anti-IL23 agents in refractory OLP, highlighting the urgency of clinical studies on the use of anti-IL agents in OLP patients. In this paper, we reviewed the English- and German-language literature about therapeutic strategies for treating OLP, focusing on new systemic therapies for erosive OLP.

Oral lichen planus: comparative efficacy and treatment costs-a systematic review

Objective

To compare the reported efficacy and costs of available interventions used for the management of oral lichen planus (OLP).

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search was performed from database inception until March 2021 in MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane library following PRISMA guidelines. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing an active intervention with placebo or different active interventions for OLP management were considered.

Results

Seventy (70) RCTs were included. The majority of evidence suggested efficacy of topical steroids (dexamethasone, clobetasol, fluocinonide, triamcinolone), topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, cyclosporine), topical retinoids, intra-lesional triamcinolone, aloe-vera gel, photodynamic therapy, and low-level laser therapies for OLP management. Based on the estimated cost per month and evidence for efficacy and side-effects, topical steroids (fluocinonide > dexamethasone > clobetasol > triamcinolone) appear to be more cost-effective than topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus > pimecrolimus > cyclosporine) followed by intra-lesional triamcinolone.

Conclusion

Of common treatment regimens for OLP, topical steroids appear to be the most economical and efficacious option followed by topical calcineurin inhibitors. Large-scale multi-modality, prospective trials in which head-to-head comparisons interventions are compared are required to definitely assess the cost-effectiveness of OLP treatments.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02168-4.

Photodynamic therapy for oral potentially malignant disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) in the treatment of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) patients.

METHODOLOGY

An electronic search was conducted to retrieve articles published until September 2021. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes of complete response (CR) and any response (AR) after treatment with PDT using data from single-arm studies, case series and non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs).

RESULTS

In total, 49 articles were included. RCTs revealed insignificant mean difference (MD) in efficacy index between PDT and comparison groups (MD: 1.32; 95% CI:-28.10-30.72, p=0.930). The likelihood of CR (OR:0.84; 95% CI: 0.42-1.71, p=0.637) or AR (OR:2.10; 95% CI: 0.31-14.25, p=0.448) was not different in PDT group when compared with any comparison treatments in NRCTs. CR/AR among single arm studies was 60.6% (95% CI: 50.5-70.7, P<0.001) and 93.7% (95% CI:91.5-95.8, P<0.001) respectively. Higher prevalence of CR and AR was observed for dysplasia or carcinoma insitu (CIS) (CR: 81%, 95% CI: 70.8-91.3, P<0.001; AR: 94.3%; 95% CI: 89-99.6, P<0.001) and actinic cheilitis (AC) (CR: 73.9%, 95% CI: 65.9-81.9, P<0.001; AR:97%; 95% CI:94.9-99, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the patients receiving PDT showed CR, with more than 90% responding to the treatment. PDT was most effective on oral dysplasias, followed by AC.

Effectiveness of methylene blue photosensitizers compared to that of corticosteroids in the management of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of methylene blue (MB) photosensitizers in the management of symptomatic oral lichen planus (OLP). Electronic online databases and manual searches were performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between January 2010 and February 2022. RCTs comparing photodynamic therapy (PDT) and corticosteroid therapy at baseline and follow-up period were identified. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed regarding visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Thongprasom sign scores, lesion size, response to treatment, and exacerbation of lesions after therapy. The clinical severity was analyzed qualitatively. Five RCTs consisting of 180 samples fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All parameters of VAS score, Thongprasom sign score, lesion size, and response to treatment were statistically non-significant. Our results indicate that both MB-PDT and corticosteroid therapy are effective for the management of OLP. Moreover, MB-PDT is an effective alternative treatment option for OLP when corticosteroids are contraindicated. However, conclusive evidence cannot be ascertained owing to the heterogeneity among the studies.

Lichen Planus

Lichen planus (LP) is a T cell-mediated disease affecting the stratified squamous epithelia of the skin and/or mucus membrane. Histologically, the disease is characterized by a lichenoid inflammatory infiltrate and vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer of the epidermis. LP has three major subtypes: Cutaneous, mucosal and appendageal LP. Rarely, it may affect the nails in the absence of skin and/or mucosal changes. LP may also be induced by several drugs, typically anti-hypertensive medication or be associated with infections, particularly viral hepatitis. The diagnosis is based on the clinical presentation and characteristic histological findings. Although the disease is often self-limiting, the intractable pruritus and painful mucosal erosions result in significant morbidity. The current first-line treatment are topical and/or systemic corticosteroids. In addition, immunosuppressants may be used as corticosteroid-sparing agents. These, however are often not sufficient to control disease. Janus kinase inhibitors and biologics (anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL17) have emerged as novel future treatment options. Thus, one may expect a dramatic change of the treatment landscape of LP in the near future.

Fractal Dimension and Texture Analysis of Lesion Autofluorescence in the Evaluation of Oral Lichen Planus Treatment Effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Oral Lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease. Topical steroids are used as the treatment of choice. The alternative is photodynamic therapy (PDT). The study aimed to fabricate optimal biodegradable matrices for methylene blue or triamcinolone acetonide because of a lack of currently commercially available carriers that could adhere to the mucous.

METHODS

The study was designed as a 12-week single-blind prospective randomized clinical trial with 30 patients, full contralateral split-mouth design. Matrices for steroid and photosensitizer and laser device were fabricated. Fractal and texture analysis of photographs, taken in 405, 450, 405 + 450 nm wavelength, of lesions was performed to increase the objectivity of the assessment of treatment.

RESULTS

We achieved two total responses for treatment in case of steroid therapy and one in the case of PDT. Partial response was noted in 17 lesions treated using local steroid therapy and 21 in the case of PDT. No statistically significant differences were found between the effectiveness of both used methods. Statistically significant differences in fractal dimension before and after treatment were observed only in the analysis of photographs taken in 405 + 450 nm wavelength.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy and topical steroid therapy are effective methods for treating OLP. Using a carrier offers the possibility of a more predictable and effective method of drug delivery into the mucous membrane. Autofluorescence enables the detection of lesions especially at the early stage of their development.

A Comparison of Clinical Efficiency of Photodynamic Therapy and Topical Corticosteroid in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Split-Mouth Randomised Controlled Study

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) to steroid therapy in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP). Due to the lack of commercially available drug carriers, innovative proprietary solutions were used for both the photosensitiser and the steroid carrier—in the first case to shorten and in the second to extend the contact of the active substance with the mucosa. Methods: A prospective, randomised, single-blind, 12-week full contralateral split-mouth clinical trial of 30 patients with bilateral oral lichen planus was conducted. The prepared matrices were incorporated with active substances methylene blue 5% and 0,05% triamcinolone. The size of lesions, Thongprasom, ABISIS, and VAS scale were evaluated. Results: Relatively high rates of complete remission of lichen were demonstrated: immediately after treatment, 33.3% with PDT and 22.2% with triamcinolone (TA), and after 3 months, 54.2% with PDT and 62.9% with TA. After 3 months of treatment, a reduction in the area of evaluated lesions of 52.7% for PDT and 41.7% for TA was achieved. Conclusion: In situations of topical or general contraindications to oral corticosteroids, resistance to them, or the need for repeated treatment in a short period of time, PDT appears to be a very promising treatment option.

Topical photodynamic therapy in the treatment of benign oral mucosal lesions: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The introduction of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in various branches of the dental field such as endodontics, implantology, periodontology, and restorative dentistry and oral medicine has become useful in recent decades. This systematic review presents an overview of the literature to evaluate the usefulness of topical PDT for the treatment of benign oral soft tissue lesions and to identify limitations in prior studies to improve PDT applications.

METHODS

We performed a review of the literature using different search engines (PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) employing MeSH terms such as "Photodynamic therapy" and "PDT" in conjunction with other terms. We utilized the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) method to define our study eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Initial results were 1513. Finally, there were only 21 studies that met our selection criteria. We divided the 21 selected items into two groups: inflammatory diseases and infective diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although topical PDT is an easy to perform and well-tolerated treatment and appears to be a valid method with promising results in the treatment of benign lesions of the oral cavity's soft tissues, further studies are needed to complete the current knowledge of this technique.

Light-Activated Biomedical Applications of Chlorophyll Derivatives

Tetrapyrroles are the basis of essential physiological functions in most living organisms. These compounds represent the basic scaffold of porphyrins, chlorophylls, and bacteriochlorophylls, among others. Chlorophyll derivatives, obtained by the natural or artificial degradation of chlorophylls, present unique properties, holding great potential in the scientific and medical fields. Indeed, they can act as cancer-preventing agents, antimutagens, apoptosis inducers, efficient antioxidants, as well as antimicrobial and immunomodulatory molecules. Moreover, thanks to their peculiar optical properties, they can be exploited as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy and as vision enhancers. Most of these molecules, however, are highly hydrophobic and poorly soluble in biological fluids, and may display undesired toxicity due to accumulation in healthy tissues. The advent of nanomedicine has prompted the development of nanoparticles acting as carriers for chlorophyll derivatives, facilitating their targeted administration with demonstrated applicability in diagnosis and therapy. In this review, the chemical and physical properties of chlorophyll derivatives that justify their usage in the biomedical field, with particular regard to light-activated dynamics are described. Their role as antioxidants and photoactive agents are discussed, introducing the most recent nanomedical applications and focusing on inorganic and organic nanocarriers exploited in vitro and in vivo.

Photodynamic therapy of oral lichen planus

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory and immune-mediated disease affecting the oral mucosa. OLP presents with asymptomatic, lacelike white stripes and/or symptomatic red, ulcerated mucous membranes. Eating, drinking and oral hygiene procedures may be painful resulting in reduced quality of life (QOL). The histopathological picture is a zone of cellular infiltrate, mainly CD8+ cells, in the superficial layer of the connective tissue and signs of liquefaction degeneration of the basal membrane. Conventional treatment is corticosteroids. Local and systemic side effects are common, and patients may develop drug resistance. The intention with this article is to demonstrate the heterogeneity in photodynamic therapy (PDT) of OLP. A search in PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and Medline (Ovid) identified seventeen clinical studies investigating PDT of OLP. Only five were randomised controlled studies and the study groups varied from 5 to 50 patients. Five different photosensitisers or precursors were tested. Both broadband spectrum lamps, lasers and light-emitting-diodes (LEDs), with wavelengths from 420 nm to 682 nm, were used. The number of treatment sessions varied from one to ten. The patients were followed up for 0 to 48 months, but in thirteen studies the post treatment observation time was ≤6 months. Single arm studies demonstrated improvement of OLP except in one study. In all controlled studies except for one, PDT was superior or equal to conventional treatment. The majority of patients experienced a slight burning sensation during light activation, but no serious adverse events were reported. Only few studies examined the effect of PDT on a cellular level.

[Progress on photodynamic therapy in oral diseases]

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has developed rapidly in basic and clinical research, and its therapeutic prospects have received increasing attention. PDT has the advantages of minimally invasive, low toxicity, high selectivity, good reproducibility, protection of appearance and vital organ function, and has become a treatment. With the development of medicine, the field of application of PDT becomes more wildly, and brings a new direction for the treatment of oral diseases. This article reviews the basic principles, treatment elements and research results of PDT in the treatment of oral diseases.

Visible Lights Combined with Photosensitizing Compounds Are Effective against Candida albicans Biofilms

Fungal infections are increasing in prevalence worldwide, especially in immunocompromised individuals. Given the emergence of drug-resistant fungi and the fact that there are only three major classes of antifungal drugs available to treat invasive fungal infections, there is a need to develop alternative therapeutic strategies effective against fungal infections. Candida albicans is a commensal of the human microbiota that is also one of the most common fungal pathogens isolated from clinical settings. C. albicans possesses several virulence traits that contribute to its pathogenicity, including the ability to form drug-resistant biofilms, which can make C. albicans infections particularly challenging to treat. Here, we explored red, green, and blue visible lights alone and in combination with common photosensitizing compounds for their efficacies at inhibiting and disrupting C. albicans biofilms. We found that blue light inhibited biofilm formation and disrupted mature biofilms on its own and that the addition of photosensitizing compounds improved its antibiofilm potential. Red and green lights, however, inhibited biofilm formation only in combination with photosensitizing compounds but had no effects on disrupting mature biofilms. Taken together, these results suggest that photodynamic therapy may be an effective non-drug treatment for fungal biofilm infections that is worthy of further exploration.

Photobiomodulation Therapy/Photodynamic Therapy Versus Steroid Therapy for Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) or photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating oral lichen planus (OLP) as well as identifiy the side effects when compared with steroid therapy. Background: Nowadays, PBMT and PDT are increasingly applied for treating OLP with minimal adverse effects. Methods: The electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Web of Science, and Embase were searched until March 13, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1 month of follow-up period were selected. Two reviewers extracted data from selected studies independently. Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used for assessing the quality of the RCTs. The random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis. Results: One thousand fifteen studies were initially identified. Finally, nine RCTs were included for quality assessment and seven studies for meta-analysis. Four RCTs were of unclear risk of bias and five were assessed as high risk of bias. The comparison showed no significant differences for pain scores [visual analog scale (VAS)] [mean differences (MD) = 0.38, confidence interval (CI) = 95% -0.64 to 1.40] and severity scores (reticular-atrophic-erosive scores) (MD = 1.67, CI = 95% -1.13 to 4.46) between topical corticosteroid therapy and PBMT after 1 month. For PDT, no significant differences were observed for sign scores (Thongprasm sign scoring) (MD = -0.31, CI = 95% -1.52 to 0.91) and pain scores (VAS) (MD = -2.30, CI = 95% -5.88 to 1.28) of the lesions when compared with topical corticosteroid therapy after 1 month of follow-up period. One study reported the discomfort of the affected area in patients of the PDT group when probe tip was moved. Conclusions: PBMT and PDT could be reliable alternatives to topical corticosteroids for OLP with no or less severe complications in a short-term period. However, further well-designed RCTs with long-term period are recommended to consolidate the conclusions in this regard.

Efficacy evaluation of photodynamic therapy for oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new option for oral lichen planus (OLP) management; however, there are different opinions on the efficacy of PDT for OLP. The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the efficacy of PDT in the treatment of OLP and compare PDT with steroid therapy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the curative effect of PDT. Five electronic databases were searched, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and EBSCO up to 1 December, 2019. Random and fixed effects models for pooled estimates calculation were used and the Meta package of R was applied.

Results

Pooled estimates revealed that, after PDT, the lesion size decreased by 1.53 cm² (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–2.35) after PDT and the partial response (PR) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65–0.85). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score decreased by 3.82 (95% CI: 2.80–4.85) and the Thongprasom sign score decreased by 1.33 (95% CI: 0.56–2.10) after PDT. Subgroup analyses revealed that the 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was more effective than methylene blue (MB), with a PR of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91). The topical use of 5-ALA yielded a better response than gargling methylene blue. In terms of VAS, the diode laser showed a better clinical PR in the treatment of OLP. In terms of changes in lesion size, the efficacy of the semiconductor laser was higher than that of the diode laser. PDT had a similar efficacy to topical corticosteroids, as shown by pooled estimates of five randomised controlled trials with 139 lesions.

Conclusion

This systematic review indicates that PDT is an effective treatment modality for the management of OLP. PDT is as effective as topical corticosteroid in the treatment of OLP and could be used for cases resistant to steroids or when steroids are contraindicated.

Laser-Assisted aPDT Protocols in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials in Dentistry: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been proposed as an effective alternative method for the adjunctive treatment of all classes of oral infections. The multifactorial nature of its mechanism of action correlates with various influencing factors, involving parameters concerning both the photosensitizer and the light delivery system. This study aims to critically evaluate the recorded parameters of aPDT applications that use lasers as the light source in randomized clinical trials in dentistry.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane search engines were used to identify human clinical trials of aPDT therapy in dentistry. After applying specific keywords, additional filters, inclusion and exclusion criteria, the initial number of 7744 articles was reduced to 38.

RESULTS

Almost one-half of the articles presented incomplete parameters, whilst the others had different protocols, even with the same photosensitizer and for the same field of application.

CONCLUSIONS

No safe recommendation for aPDT protocols can be extrapolated for clinical use. Further research investigations should be performed with clear protocols, so that standardization for their potential dental applications can be achieved.

Photodynamic therapy using topical toluidine blue for the treatment of oral leukoplakia: A prospective case series

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of oral leukoplakia (OL) through the activation of a photosensitizer, after exposure to a specific wavelength light source.

METHODS

To investigate the effectiveness of toluidine blue as topical photosensitizer. Eleven patients participated in this study; fifteen oral leukoplakia lesions were treated, in several sessions, with 2.5 % toluidine blue and an LED source of 630 nm wavelength. Patients were evaluated at baseline (t0), at the end of treatment cycles (t1) and one year from the end of treatment (t2). All the treated sites were photographed at each visit. Images were processed with ImageJ 1.52 software in order to obtain the areas (mm2) of the treated lesions. Comparison between data at different follow-up was performed using a paired T-test.

RESULTS

At t1, complete response was obtained in six lesions, partial response in seven lesions while only two lesions showed no response. At t2, a further improvement was observed in two patients. The analysis of the areas showed significant reduction of the lesion size from t0 to t1 (p = 0.003), and from t1 to t2 (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Toluidine blue appears to be a promising photosensitizer in the photodynamic therapy of oral leukoplakia.

A Critical Reappraisal of Off-Label Use of Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Non-Neoplastic Skin Conditions

BACKGROUND

In the past 30 years, topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been investigated for the treatment of a broad spectrum of cosmetic, inflammatory, and infectious skin conditions with variable, and often contrasting, results. However, the non-expert clinician may be in difficulty evaluating these results because different sensitizers, concentrations, formulations, light sources, and irradiation protocols have been used. In addition, many of these studies have poor quality design being case reports and uncontrolled studies of few cases.

SUMMARY

With the aim to clarify the potential usefulness of PDT for the treatment of infectious and inflammatory skin diseases as well as selected cosmetic indications, we searched for randomized controlled clinical trials, non-randomized comparative studies, retrospective studies, and case series studies with a number of at least 10 patients, published since 1990. Later, we reappraised the results in order to give a simple critical overview. Key Messages: Evidence from the literature seems to strongly support the use of ALA- and MAL-PDT for the treatment of common skin diseases such as acne, warts, condylomata, and Leishmania skin infection and for photorejuvenation, i.e., the correction of selected cosmetic changes of aging and photoaging. For other disorders, the level of evidence and strength of recommendation are lower, and controlled randomized studies with prolonged follow-ups are necessary in order to assess the clinical usefulness and other potential advantages over current treatment options.

Photodynamic therapy in oral lichen planus: A prospective case-controlled pilot study

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common, chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the mucous membranes, which causes major discomfort. Current treatment includes topical/systemic glucocorticoids, immune modulators and systemic immunosuppressants, which may lead to considerable side-effects. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and immunological efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in OLP as an alternative, easy-to-use, safe and non-invasive treatment. Twenty patients with OLP were treated with PDT in a prospective case-controlled pilot-study. PDT was performed on the most extensive oral lesion in 4 sessions (day 1, 3, 7, 14). Peripheral blood and lesional T cells were analysed before (day 1) and after PDT treatment (day 28). PDT led to a statistically significant reduction of clinical parameters (lesion size, ABSIS, Thongprasom-score) and improvement of all evaluated quality-of-life (QOL) items. The clinical improvement was accompanied by a significant decrease of the relative number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in mucosal OLP-lesions. Furthermore, CXCL10 plasma levels were decreased and the number of activated peripheral CD4 + CD137+ and CD8 + CD137+ T cells and IL-17-secreting T cells was diminished. PDT treatment in OLP leads to lesion reduction and improvement of QOL, and induces local and systemic anti-inflammatory effects. The study identifies PDT as a novel therapeutic option in OLP.

Could photodynamic therapy be utilized as a treatment modality for oral lichen planus?

BACKGROUND

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease. There is no standard treatment modality for OLP. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been advocated as a new treatment modality for OLP.

AIM

The aim of the present study is to compare the effect of PDT using methylene blue (MB) as a photosensitizer to the effect of topical corticosteroids in the treatment of erosive OLP lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 20 patients with erosive OLP. Patients were divided into two groups. The study group included 10 patents which received MB-PDT. Patients were instructed to use MB as mouth path for 5 min. After 10 min, we applied focal red light on OLP lesions (wavelength 660 nm, Intensity 100-130 m W/cm2) for 2 min. The PDT was applied twice a week for four weeks. In the control group, 10 patients were instructed to apply topical betamethasone valerate ointment 100 mg on OLP lesion three times per day for four weeks. Subjective, objective scores and lesion size were recorded at time zero, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks from the start of treatments.

RESULTS

Both groups showed statistically significant differences between time zero and the 4^th week of treatment in subjective, objective scores and the area of the lesions. MB-PDT showed a higher degree of improvement than topical corticosteroids between time zero and the 4^th week of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy can be used as a treatment for erosive OLP. PDT offers improvement of OLP subjective and objective scores without major side effects.

Comparison of the effect of photodynamic therapy and topical corticosteroid on oral lichen planus lesions

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the effect of photodynamic therapy with topical corticosteroid in oral lichen planus patients was compared.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, eight patients with bilateral oral OLP lesions were recruited. Toluidine blue was applied on the lesions of both sides; a 660-nm diode laser InGaAlP was irradiated for 10 min (power: 25 mW, fluence: 19.23 J/cm² , probe cross section: 0.78 cm² ) for three sessions. In the control side of the oral mucosa, only sham laser was used. Follow-up sessions were held on weeks 3 and 7. In week 3, oral paste triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% was prescribed. Response rates were assessed clinically by VAS, Thongprasom sign scoring, clinical severity index, efficacy indices, and the amount of reduction in the size of the lesions. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

In spite of the control side, all scores improved significantly between sessions 0 and 4 for the intervention side. The differences between the changes in almost all scores between sessions 0 and 4 in both the intervention and control sides were significantly considerable (p value < .05).

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy can be used as an alternative therapy alongside standard methods or as a new modality for refractory OLP.

Clinical Management of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review

Aim:

The clinical management of OLP represents a considerable challenge for the oral physician. The aim of this review is to assess the main intervention used in the management of OLP and the efficacy of every type of treatment.

Materials & Methods:

We searched and analyzed PubMed database for articles on OLP management. Only randomized controlled trials, comparing an active treatment with placebo, or between different active treatments, were considered in this systematic review. Only patients with symptomatic OLP were included and interventions of all types were considered (topical treatment, systemic drugs, non pharmacological intervention).

Results:

A total of 25 randomized controlled trials were examined and included in this review. Steroids are the most frequently employed drug in the treatment of OLP and their efficacy and safety are demonstrated. Also calcineurin inhibitors and photo-dynamic therapy are used in different studies for OLP management, with positive results.

Conclusion:

Topical steroids remain the first-line treatment for symptomatic OLP, however, many different pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies would represent a valid alternative for its management, but, nowadays they require further investigations.

Photodynamic therapy for oral potentially malignant disorders

To assess the impact of photodynamic therapy (PDT) parameters in the management of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assessed the curative effect of PDT published in PubMed and Embase until Dec 2018. Random or fixed effects models for pooled estimates calculation were used. A pooled estimate calculation revealed that lesion size decreased by 1.38 cm² (95% CI: 0.39-2.36) after PDT, and the overall complete response (CR) was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.36-0.68), while partial response (PR) reached 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.88). Subgroup analyses revealed that the lesion response (CR: 0.21 [95% CI: 0.12-0.33]) of oral lichen planus was worse than that of other disease entities. 20% aminolevulinic acid was more effective than other photosensitizers, with the overall CR was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.42-0.86), while the PR was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.76-0.94). Topical use of photosensitizers can yield desirable results, while gargling methylene blue yields poor response (0.82 [95% CI: 0.75-0.88] vs. 0.59 [95% CI: 0.44-0.72], respectively). PDT is an effective treatment modality in the management of OPMDs, the overall efficacy of which is influenced by several factors.

Molecular Tools to Generate Reactive Oxygen Species in Biological Systems

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) not only are byproducts of aerobic respiration, but also play vital roles in metabolism regulation and signal transductions. It is important to understand the functions of ROS in biological systems. In addition, scientists have made use of ROS to kill bacteria and tumors through a process known as photodynamic therapy (PDT). This paper provides a concise review of current molecular tools that can generate ROS in biological systems via either nongenetic or genetically encoded way. Challenges and perspectives are further discussed with the hope of broadening the applications of ROS generators in research and clinical settings.

A clinical evaluation of efficacy of photodynamic therapy in treatment of reticular oral lichen planus: A case series

Background The aim of the study was to clinically evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in treatment of reticular oral lichen planus (OLP). Methods Fifty patients aged 26-84, with 124 OLP lesions in total, underwent photodynamic therapy (PDT) mediated with topically applied 5% 5-aminolevulinic acid. ALA was activated by a custom-made diode lamp with a high-power LED emitting light at 630 nm and 300 mW delivered through an optical fiber probe. A light exposure dose was 150 J/cm2. The therapy comprised of 10 weekly illumination sessions. The lesions' response was macroscopically measured in millimeters with a periodontal probe and clinically evaluated at each session, then on completion of the series and throughout the 12-month follow-up. Results The baseline mean size of lesions was 3.99 cm2±3.73. The lesions on the buccal mucosa and lips (lining mucosa) were larger than those on the gingiva and tongue (masticatory mucosa) - 4.58 cm2±4.01 and 2.93 cm2±2.91 respectively. On completion of the therapy 109 sites improved, including 46 in complete remission. The mean reduction in size was 62.91% (p = 0.000000). 12-month after therapy mean reduction of the lesions was 78.7% (p = 0.000000), specifically 79.48% (p = 0.000000) within the lining mucosa and 76.11% on the masticatory mucosa. Conclusions The results proved that ALA-mediated photodynamic therapy with a 630 nm light was effective and as such it can be used as an optional treatment for symptomatic OLP.

Photodynamic therapy for symptomatic oral lichen planus

Data sourcesMEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of knowledge, from date of inception up to July 2017. Hand searching of the reference lists of the included studies was performed.Study selectionRandomised (RCT) and non-randomised (n-RCT) controlled trials and controlled and comparative studies were included in patients more than 18 years old diagnosed with symptomatic oral lichen planus, histopathologically confirmed, on the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT) compared with corticosteroids, published in English.Data extraction and synthesisTwo authors independently assessed for inclusion and performed quality assessment of the included studies following the CONSORT statement followed by the overall estimation of the risk of bias. Data extraction was also done independently by two authors. The primary outcome was the effect of PDT on pain and clinical improvement.ResultsFive studies were included: three RCTs and two n-RCTs having between eight and 30 participants. Two studies used diode laser and three used light emitting diode (LED) and the duration of the radiation ranged between 30 seconds to ten minutes. Each study used a unique corticosteroid agent. Three studies used methylene blue, one toluidine blue and one 5-aminolevulinic acid as photosensitiser agent. Follow-up was between one and three months. The authors presented the results as a narrative review.ConclusionsThe limited present evidence suggests that PDT is an effective treatment option for the management of OLP by reduction in pain, burning and decrease in the size of the lesions.

Clinical features and management of oral lichen planus (OLP) with emphasis on the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related OLP

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the occurrence of multiple, symmetrical lesions in the oral cavity. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been suggested as an etiological factor in OLP. The purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature regarding the treatment of OLP in patients with HCV infection. An electronic search of the PubMed database was conducted until January 2018, using the following keywords: OLP, HCV, corticosteroids, retinoids, immunomodulatory agents, surgical interventions, photochemotherapy, laser therapy, interferon, ribavirin, and direct-acting antivirals. We selected the articles focusing on the clinical features and treatment management of OLP in patients with/without HCV infection. Topical corticosteroids are considered the first-line treatment in OLP. Calcineurin inhibitors or retinoids can be beneficial for recalcitrant OLP lesions. Systemic therapy should be used in the case of extensive and refractory lesions that involve extraoral sites. Surgical intervention is recommended for isolated lesions. In patients with HCV, monotherapy with interferon (IFN)-α may either improve, aggravate or trigger OLP lesions, while combined IFN-α and ribavirin therapy does not significantly influence the progression of lesions. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy appears to be a promising approach in patients with HCV-related OLP, as it can improve symptoms of both liver disease and OLP, with fewer side effects. Nevertheless, for clinical utility of DAAs in OLP patients, further studies with larger sample sizes, adequate treatment duration, and long term follow-up are required.

Evaluation of Combined Topical Ozone and Steroid Therapy in Management of Oral Lichen Planus

AIM:

The present study aims to assess the therapeutic effect of the combination of topical ozone and steroid therapy in comparison to topical ozone alone versus topical steroid as a control in the management of atrophic - erosive oral lichen planus (OLP).

METHODS:

Sixty-six patients are having atrophic-erosive OLP were included in the study. They were randomly divided into three equal groups to be treated with topical corticosteroids alone (steroid group) as control, topical ozone alone (ozone group) or combination of topical steroids and ozone (combined group). Assessment of pain and sign scores was done before and after each treatment modality.

RESULTS:

The results revealed that the greatest significant percentage of change and subsequent improvement in pain and sign scores were recorded in the combined group.

CONCLUSION:

Reported data in this study using the combination of ozone and steroid therapy could provide a new promising safe and effective adjunct therapy for management of OLP.

Photodynamic therapy with topical photosensitizers in mucosal and semimucosal areas: Review from a dermatologic perspective

Photodynamic Therapy is a procedure based on the interaction between a Photosensitizer, a light source with a specific wavelength and oxygen. The aim of this review is to provide a brief and updated analysis of scientific reports on the use of PDT with topical PS in the management of oncological, infectious, and inflammatory disorders involving mucosal and semimucosal areas, with a specific focus on diseases of dermatologic interest.

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of symptomatic oral lichen planus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of symptomatic oral lichen planus (OLP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI Web of knowledge were searched until July 2017, using the following keywords: OLP, erosive lichen planus, lichen planus, and PDT.

RESULTS

Five clinical studies were included. The risk of bias was considered high in 4 studies and moderate in 1 study. The efficacy of PDT was compared with topical corticosteroids in all included studies. Laser wavelengths, duration of irradiation, and power density ranged between 420-660 nm, 30 seconds to 10 minutes, and 10-500 mW/cm² , respectively. All studies reported PDT to be effective in the management of symptomatic OLP. Two studies reported PDT to be as effective as corticosteroids, 1 study reported a better efficacy of PDT compared to corticosteroids, whereas 2 studies found PDT to be inferior to corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited available evidence suggests that PDT is an effective treatment option for the management of OLP. However, due to the limited number of studies included in this review and heterogeneity among these studies, more well-designed clinical trials with adequate sample sizes are highly warranted.