Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy compared with laparoscopic proximal or total gastrectomy for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer in the upper gastric body

Current Status of Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in Oldest-old Patients Aged 85 Years or Older

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the safety of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in oldest-old patients aged ≥ 85 years.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the patients aged ≥ 85 years who diagnosed with gastric cancer between 2008 and 2022. The study patients were divided into three groups: a surgery group, an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) group, and a non-surgery and non-ESD group (n = 64, 57, and 152). Surgical outcomes and 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS) were investigated.

RESULTS

In the surgery group, the study cohort comprised 30 males and 34 females with a median age of 87 years. Distal, proximal, and total gastrectomy (DG, PG, and TG) were performed in 54, 1, and 9 patients, respectively. There were 27, 16, 17, and 4 patients with pStage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Thirty-day morbidity with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 and 30-day mortality were 12.5% and 3.1%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves for the 3-year OS and RFS demonstrated that survival curves worsened with increasing pStage (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analyses for the 3-year OS and RFS, TG and pStage ≥ III were independent risk factors (p = 0.028 and 0.011 in OS, p = 0.021 and 0.001 in RFS). In comparisons of 3-year OSs among the three groups in each cStage, survivals in the surgery group were consistently better than those in the non-surgery and non-ESD group in cStages I to III (p < 0.001, 0.001, and < 0.001 in cStage I, II, and III, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer can be performed safely and has a chance to improve survival even in the oldest-old patients aged ≥ 85 years.

Updated Review of Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer or Cancer of the Gastroesophageal Junction

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has reemerged as a viable surgical option for managing proximal gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer, particularly for early-stage tumors, offering potential advantages over total gastrectomy (TG). This review examines the evolution of PG, emphasizing surgical techniques and outcomes. Although PG was initially abandoned due to postoperative complications such as reflux esophagitis, advances in reconstruction methods, such as the double-flap technique and double-tract reconstruction, have significantly improved patient quality of life and reduced complications. Modern techniques focus on preserving gastric function, enhancing postoperative nutritional status, and minimizing morbidity, especially compared to TG. However, debates persist regarding the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy, oncological safety, and the risk of metachronous gastric cancer after surgery. Various international guidelines support PG for specific cases, particularly where lymph node involvement is limited, and functional preservation is prioritized. Despite promising survival and quality-of-life outcomes, certain risks, such as anastomotic stenosis and metachronous cancer, remain. The role of PG in treating cancer of the gastroesophageal junction continues to be investigated, with ongoing studies further clarifying its effectiveness. The evolving techniques and increased focus on patient-centered outcomes suggest a renewed role of PG in the surgical management of gastric cancer.

Comparison of surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional parameters between subtotal and proximal gastrectomy in patients with proximal early gastric cancer

Aim

In this study, we evaluated the difference in short-term outcomes and postoperative nutritional status between subtotal gastrectomy (sTG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) to determine the optimal surgical treatment for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach.

Methods

Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic sTG or PG at the Shizuoka Cancer Center in Shizuoka between January 2014 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, endoscopic findings, and postoperative nutritional changes, including blood tests, body weight, psoas muscle, and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, were measured and compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 110 patients were enrolled, including 42 in the sTG group and 68 in the PG group. Albumin and hemoglobin levels were comparable between the two groups. Changes in body weight and psoas mass index measured over 36 months postoperatively were favorable in the sTG group compared with the PG group (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in subcutaneous or visceral adipose tissue between the two groups (p = 0.331 and 0.845, respectively).

Conclusion

sTG is the preferred function-preserving gastrectomy procedure for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach because it is associated with less postoperative body weight loss and psoas mass index loss.

Long-term Results of Totally Laparoscopic Near-total Gastrectomy for Middle-third Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

In recent years, laparoscopic near-total gastrectomy (LnTG) has emerged as a surgical option for gastric cancer in the middle-third of the stomach. However, its application in locally advanced stages presents technical challenges. This study aims to provide a detailed analysis of the operative outcomes and long-term functional and oncological results of totally LnTG in combination with D2 lymphadenectomy for middle-third gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A prospective study was conducted on 79 patients who underwent totally LnTG and D2 lymphadenectomy for middle-third gastric cancer between January 2017 and December 2021. Short-term outcomes included operative characteristics, and the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux and gastric remnant condition using endoscopy based on the Los Angeles (LA) and Residue-Gastritis-Bile classifications. Long-term oncological outcomes included overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Totally LnTG was successfully performed in 98.7% of patients without intraoperative complications or conversions to laparotomy. The mean operation time was 202.2±43.0 min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50;100) mL. The overall incidence of postoperative morbidities was 16.5%, with one patient experiencing a narrowing of the gastrojejunostomy, successfully treated by endoscopic balloon dilation. All patients had tumor-free resection margins, and there were no mortalities. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 80% and 55%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Totally LnTG is an effective and feasible approach for gastric cancer in the middle-third of the stomach, yielding favorable short-term outcomes and acceptable long-term results. Routine application of totally LnTG for middle-third gastric cancer is practical and promising.

The comparison of prognoses between total and distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients ≥ 80 years old

PURPOSE

In Japan, the number of distal gastrectomy for patients ≥ 80 years old is increasing, whereas that of total gastrectomy is decreasing. Surgeons seem to avoid total gastrectomy for elderly patients. Total gastrectomy is reported to have a poorer prognosis than distal gastrectomy, and postoperative pneumonia may be involved in the cause.

METHODS

The medical records of 39 and 108 patients ≥ 80 years old who underwent total and distal gastrectomy, respectively, at 2 affiliated institutions between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Prognoses were compared between the two groups, focusing on death from pneumonia.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time after total and distal gastrectomy was 21.3 and 74.1 months, respectively, with a significantly poorer prognosis after total gastrectomy than after distal gastrectomy (p < 0.01, hazard ratio [HR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-3.53). The gastric cancer-specific survival time was significantly worse after total gastrectomy than after distal gastrectomy (p < 0.01, HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.29-5.79). The pneumonia-specific survival time was also significantly worse after total gastrectomy than after distal gastrectomy (p = 0.01, HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.25-9.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent total gastrectomy had a poorer prognosis than those who underwent distal gastrectomy, because many patients died of pneumonia early after total gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: A Narrative Review

Function-preserving procedures to maintain postoperative quality of life are an important aspect of treatment for early gastric cancer. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with a small remnant stomach, namely laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LsTG), are alternative function-preserving procedures for laparoscopic total gastrectomy of early proximal gastric cancer. In LPG, esophagogastrostomy with techniques to prevent reflux and double-tract and jejunal interposition including esophagojejunostomy is usually chosen for reconstruction. The double-flap technique is currently a preferred reconstruction technique in Japan as an esophagogastrostomy approach to prevent reflux esophagitis. However, standardized reconstruction methods after LPG have not yet been established. In LsTG, preservation of the esophagogastric junction and the fundus prevents reflux and malnutrition, which may maintain quality of life. However, whether LsTG is an oncologically and nutritionally acceptable procedure compared with laparoscopic total gastrectomy or LPG is a concern. In this review, we summarize the status of reconstruction in LPG and the oncological and nutritional aspects of LsTG as a function-preserving gastrectomy for early proximal gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer.

Advantages of Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Older Patients With Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer: Maintenance of Nutritional Status and Favorable Survival

PURPOSE

The incidence of early gastric cancer is increasing in older patients alongside life expectancy. For early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, laparoscopic function-preserving gastrectomy (LFPG), including laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LSTG), is expected to be an alternative to laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). However, whether LFPG has advantages over LTG in older patients remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of consecutive patients aged ≥75 years who underwent LTG, LPG, or LSTG for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer between 2005 and 2019. Surgical and nutritional outcomes, including blood parameters, percentage body weight (%BW) and percentage skeletal muscle index (%SMI) were compared between LTG and LPG or LSTG. Survival outcomes were also compared between LTG and LFPG groups.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients who underwent LTG (n=39), LPG (n=48), and LSTG (n=24) were enrolled in this study. To match the surgical indications, LTG was further categorized into "LTG for LPG" (LTG-P) and "LTG for LSTG" (LTG-S). No significant differences were identified in the incidence of postoperative complications among the procedures. Postoperative nutritional parameters, %BW and %SMI were better after LPG and LSTG than after LTG-P and LTG-S, respectively. The survival outcomes of LFPG were better than those of LTG.

CONCLUSIONS

LFPG is safe for older patients and has advantages over LTG in terms of postoperative nutritional parameters, body weight, skeletal muscle-sparing, and survival. Therefore, LFPG for upper early gastric cancer should be considered in older patients.

Study protocol for comparing the efficacy of left-open single-flap technique versus double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Proximal gastrectomy has gradually gained more attention due to its superiority in retaining the function of part of the stomach. The inevitable loss of the antireflux barrier and postoperative complications resulting from proximal gastrectomy can severely affect the quality of life. Continuous improvements in digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy have yielded the development of a variety of methods with antireflux functions. Recently, our center attempted the left-open single-flap technique and initiated a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial for patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy to reduce the difficulty of surgical anastomosis and the incidence of perioperative complications compared with the double-flap technique. These findings will provide more evidence-based medical research for the development of clinical guidelines.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. We plan to recruit 250 patients who are eligible for proximal gastrectomy. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomly assigned to the trial group (left-open single-flap technique) and the control group (double-flap technique) in a 1:1 allocation ratio.

DISCUSSION

Increasingly, clinical studies have focused on the improvement of reconstruction modalities after proximal gastrectomy. Among these methods, the double-flap technique is a clinically effective method. The purpose of this study is to establish a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of the left-open single-flap technique versus the double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy, aiming to provide more evidence-based medical studies for digestive tract reconstruction in proximal gastrectomy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT05418920].

Risks and benefits of additional surgery for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach meeting non-curative resection criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background

Additional surgery is recommended after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. However, it is not easy to recommend for tumors located in the upper third of the stomach, because it would be a total or proximal gastrectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the actual risks and benefits of additional gastrectomy for upper third tumors.

Methods

We reviewed the clinicopathological data of patients who underwent total or proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach between March 2002 and January 2021. The incidence of lymph node metastasis and postoperative complications were calculated, and risk factors for lymph node metastasis were identified using logistic regression analysis. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

A total of 523 patients underwent total or proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer; 379 of them had tumors meeting the non-curative resection criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection. The overall lymph node metastasis rate was 9.5%, and lymphovascular invasion was the only significant risk factor for lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001). The most common sites of lymph node metastasis were stations 1, 3, and 7, with their rates being 3.2%, 3.7%, and 3.2%, respectively. Overall and severe (Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher) postoperative complication rates were 21.1% and 14.0%, respectively, while postoperative mortality was 0.5% (2/379). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with and without lymph node metastasis were 96.1% and 81.1%, respectively (p = 0.076).

Conclusions

Before planning an additional gastrectomy after non-curative endoscopic resection for the upper third tumor, we should consider both the benefit of the 9.5% curability for lymph node metastasis and the risks of the 21% postoperative complications and 0.5% mortality.

Proximal Gastrectomy Versus Total Gastrectomy for Siewert II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has rapidly increased in recent years. Popular surgical approaches for AEG are proximal gastrectomy (PG) and total gastrectomy (TG), but it is controversial as to which approach is superior. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of PG and TG for AEG.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 1 June 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to conduct quality assessments, and RevMan (Version 5.4) was used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 1,734 patients with Siewert II/III AEG in 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. PG was associated with less number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD =  - 9.00, 95% CI - 12.61 to - 5.39, P < 0.00001), smaller tumor size (WMD =  - 1.02, 95% CI - 1.71 to - 0.33, P = 0.004), shorter hospital length of stay (WMD =  - 3.99, 95% CI - 7.27 to - 0.71, P = 0.02), and better long-term nutritional status compared with TG. Overall complications, other complications, and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed that the occurrence of anastomotic strictures and reflux esophagitis was associated with the use of novel gastrointestinal tract (GI) anastomoses (double-tract reconstruction, jejunal interposition, and semi-embedded valve anastomosis) after PG.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, we recommend that surgeons accept PG combined with multiple novel anastomoses as an optimal surgical approach in patients diagnosed with resectable Siewert type II/III AEG.

A comparative study of laparoscopic near-total and total gastrectomy for patient nutritional status and quality of life using a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of LNTG had small sample sizes and short follow-up periods and did not evaluate quality of life after LNTG. We aimed to compare surgical, oncological, nutritional outcomes, and quality of life of patients after laparoscopic near-total and total gastrectomy (LNTG and LTG, respectively).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed data of 167 and 294 patients who underwent LNTG and LTG, respectively, for treatment of upper or middle third gastric cancer between January 2008 and December 2018. After propensity score matching, the surgical, oncological, and nutritional outcomes of 324 patients were analyzed. Moreover, we measured quality of life after surgery using a postgastrectomy syndrome scale.

RESULTS

The operation time and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LNTG group than in the LTG group. In addition, patients with anastomotic complications were fewer in the LNTG group. No significant difference was found in the 5-year overall survival rate between the two groups. However, patients in the LNTG group had a significantly smaller body weight loss after 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, patients in the LNTG group had significantly healthier albumin and cholesterol than those in the LTG group. The mean scores on the postgastrectomy symptom scale at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were higher in the LNTG group than in the LTG group.

CONCLUSION

LNTG is a surgically safe and oncologically favorable method compared with LTG. Furthermore, patients who underwent LNTG had improved nutritional status and quality of life than those who underwent LTG.

Evaluation of postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives of small remnant distal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer using a large-scale questionnaire survey

AIM

Total gastrectomy (TG) is often performed for proximal gastric cancer. Small remnant distal gastrectomy (SRDG) can also be used in cases where surgical margins can be secured. The impact of preserving proximal small remnant stomach on postoperative quality of life (QOL) has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we compared postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives between patients undergoing SRDG and those undergoing TG for proximal gastric cancer using the developed Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45.

METHODS

Of the 1909 patients enrolled in the PGSAS NEXT study, univariate analysis of 19 main outcomes measures (MOMs) of PGSAS-45 was performed in patients undergoing TG (n = 1020) or SRDG (n = 54). Multiple regression analysis was performed with several clinical factors as explanatory variables.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age and sex between TG and SRDG groups. In SRDG group, postoperative period was shorter, the rates of laparoscopic approach and preservation of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve were higher, and the rates of clinical stage III/IV disease, ≥D2 dissection, and combined resection with other organs were lower than in the TG group significantly (P < .05). SRDG was associated with significantly lower symptoms and better daily lives than TG in 12 and 13 of 19 MOMs in PGSAS-45 by univariate and multiple regression analyses, respectively (P < .05). Several other clinical factors were also associated with certain MOMs.

CONCLUSION

The PGSAS-45 revealed that SRDG was associated with better postgastrectomy symptoms and daily lives than TG.

Double tract reconstruction versus double flap technique: short-term clinical outcomes after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) is increasingly preferred for operative management of early gastric cancer, although there is no consensus on a standard reconstruction method after resection. Two popular methods used after LPG are double tract reconstruction (DTR) and double flap technique (DFT). This study assessed comprehensive clinical outcomes including quality of life (QoL) and body composition change 1 year after DFT and DTR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from 51 to 18 patients who underwent DTR and DFT, respectively, between September 2014 and December 2018. Short-term surgical outcomes, presence of reflux esophagitis, nutritional supplementation, medications, nutritional status (laboratory results and body composition analysis), and QoL measured preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Both groups did not differ significantly in clinicopathological characteristics. The DFT as compared to the DTR group required significantly longer time for anastomosis (79.4 vs. 60.9 min, p < 0.001) and use of fewer staplers (3.39 vs. 6.86, p < 0.001). While the presence of endoscopic reflux esophagitis and iron/vitamin B₁₂ replacement were comparable, the DTR group showed a higher tendency of taking anti-reflux medications for reflux symptoms (DTR: 13.7% vs. DFT: 0.0%, p = 0.177). The DTR group lost significantly more weight (p = 0.038) and body fat (p = 0.009). QoL analysis showed significant deterioration in diarrhea, eating restriction, and taste problems in both groups (DTR group: p = 0.008, p < 0.001, p = 0.010, respectively, and DFT group: p = 0.017, p = 0.024, p = 0.034, respectively). However, only the DTR group showed significant deterioration in physical function (p = 0.009), role function (p = 0.033), nausea/vomiting (p = 0.041), appetite loss (p = 0.019), dysphagia (p = 0.001), pain (p = 0.025), and body image (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite requiring a longer anastomosis time, performing DFT after LPG was shown to be an ideal reconstruction method in terms of better 1-year QoL and nutritional outcome. Further larger studies over longer postoperative periods are necessary to confirm our findings.

Risk factors and oncological impact of positive resection margins in gastrectomy for cancer: are they salvaged by an additional resection?

BACKGROUND

The situation of positive resection margins (PRMs) varies notably between Western and Asian countries. In the West, PRMs are associated with advanced disease and R1, whereas in Asia, PRMs are also considered in early disease because stomach preservation was recently prioritized. Furthermore, PRMs are usually resected to obtain R0. However, the oncological impact of PRMs and additional resection remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological impact of PRMs in laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for clinical stage (cStage) I gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 2121 patients who underwent LG for cStage I gastric cancer between 2007 and 2015 were enrolled. Survival outcomes were compared between patients with PRMs (group P) and those without (group N). Furthermore, prognostic factors were analyzed using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (1.3%) had PRMs. Patients in group P had upper and more advanced disease, and the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was worse in group P compared with group N (76.3% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.003). The 5-year RFS of patients with pT2 or deeper (pT2-4) disease in group P was significantly worse than that of patients in group N (66.7% vs. 89.5%, P = 0.030) although that of patients with pT1 was not. Likelihood ratio tests showed that there was a significant interaction between pT status and PRM (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

PRM in cStage I gastric cancer is associated with advanced upper disease. It remains an independent prognostic factor in pT2-4 disease even after an additional resection to obtain R0.

Impact of Type of Gastrectomy on Death from Pneumonia in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer Over the Long Term

BACKGROUND

Gastrectomy may induce significant postoperative disabilities and worsen the quality of life in elderly patients. Without a functioning esophagogastric junction (EGJ), swallowing is impaired because of the anatomical and physiological changes after surgery, which increases the risk of postoperative pneumonia. The aim of this study was to identify the impact of the type of surgical procedure on death from pneumonia in elderly patients with gastric cancer (GC) over the long term.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 343 patients with GC who underwent curative gastrectomy in our hospital. We divided the patients into elderly and non-elderly groups. Among them, 109 patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent curative resection were analyzed, their clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes were compared, and the impact of the type of surgical procedure on death from pneumonia over the long term was evaluated. The institutional scientific review board of Kumamoto University Hospital was approved for data collection and analysis (No. 1037).

RESULTS

There were significantly higher levels of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and poor nutrition in the elderly group; however, gender, BMI and factors related to pneumonia did not differ significantly between groups. The median duration of follow-up time 1588 days. On the multivariate analysis, age and surgical procedure were selected as independent predictive factors for pneumonia-related survival.

CONCLUSION

Preservation of the EGJ as much as possible while maintaining curability is useful for reducing postoperative death from pneumonia over the long term in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Current status of function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is "function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG)." FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long-term prognosis. Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative to total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC in the upper-third of the stomach, in which the gastric reservoir, gastric acid secretion, and intrinsic factors are maintained. Distal gastrectomy (DG) with a small remnant stomach, namely subtotal gastrectomy (STG), is another option for upper EGC, where the function of the cardia and fundus is preserved. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a good alternative to DG for EGC in the middle-third of the stomach, where pyloric function is preserved. Following elucidation of the markedly low incidences of possible metastasis to lymph node stations where dissection is omitted, the oncological safety of these FPG procedures was clarified. Nutritional advantages of PG or STG over TG have been reported; however, the standardized reconstruction methods after PG are yet to be established, and it is important to devise methods to prevent postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic complications regardless of the reconstruction method. Nutritional benefits of PPG compared with DG have also been clarified, in which reducing postoperative gastric stasis is important. For the further spread of these FPG procedures, several issues, such as precise evaluation of preserved function, confirmation of oncological safety, and standardization of the technique, should be addressed in future prospective randomized controlled trials.

Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with regard to outcomes, including efficacy and safety, in patients with proximal gastric cancer.

METHODS

Original English-language articles comparing LPG and LTG for proximal gastric cancer up to November 2019 were systematically searched in the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases by two independent reviewers. Our main endpoints were surgery-related features (operation time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, and postoperative hospital stay), postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic stenosis, and reflux esophagitis), and oncologic outcomes (5-year overall survival and recurrent cancer).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including a total of 1,282 cases (510 LPG and 772 LTG) were enrolled. Fewer lymph nodes were harvested (WMD = -13.33, 95% CI: -15.66 to -11.00, P < 0.00001) and more postoperative anastomotic stenosis (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.39, P = 0.007) observed in LPG than LTG. There were no significant differences in other explored parameters between the two methods. However, based on a subgroup analysis of digestive tract reconstruction, LPG with esophagogastrostomy (LPG-EG) had shorter operative time (WMD = -42.51, 95% CI: -58.99 to -26.03, P < 0.00001), less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -79.52, 95% CI: -116.63 to -42.41, P < 0.0001), and more reflux esophagitis (OR = 3.92, 95% CI: 1.56 to 9.83, P = 0.004) than was observed for LTG. There was no difference between LPG performed with the double tract anastomosis/double-flap technique (DT/DFT) and LTG.

CONCLUSION

LPG can be performed as an alternative to LTG for proximal gastric cancer, especially LPG-DT/DFT, with comparable safety and efficacy.

Postoperative nutritional outcomes and quality of life-related complications of proximal versus total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Although proximal gastrectomy (PG) provides superior nutritional outcomes over total gastrectomy (TG) in upper-third early gastric cancer (EGC), surgeons are reluctant to perform PG due to the high rate of postoperative reflux. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively compare operative outcomes, nutritional outcomes, and quality of life-related complications between TG and PG performed with esophagogastrostomy (EG), jejunal interposition, or double-tract reconstruction (DTR) to reduce reflux after PG. After searching PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases, 25 studies comparing PG with TG in upper-third EGC published up to October 2020 were identified. PG with DTR was similar to TG regarding operative outcomes. Patients who underwent PG with DTR had less weight reduction (weighted mean difference [WMD] 4.29; 95% confidence interval [0.51–8.07]), reduced hemoglobin loss (WMD 5.74; [2.56–8.93]), and reduced vitamin B₁₂ supplementation requirement (odds ratio [OR] 0.06; [0.00–0.89]) compared to patients who underwent TG. PG with EG caused more reflux (OR 5.18; [2.03–13.24]) and anastomotic stenosis (OR 3.94; [2.40–6.46]) than TG. However, PG with DTR was similar to TG regarding quality of life-related complications including reflux, anastomotic stenosis, and leakage. Hence, PG with DTR can be recommended for patients with upper-third EGC considering its superior postoperative nutritional outcomes.

Early Surgical and Long-term Oncological Outcomes of Totally Laparoscopic Near-total Gastrectomy in >150 Cases

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the early surgical outcomes and long-term oncological safety of totally laparoscopic near-total gastrectomy for the treatment of upper-third early gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of 167 consecutive patients who underwent totally laparoscopic near-total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer between January 2008 and May 2018. Data on clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes, including operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, pathologic findings, and postoperative complications, were obtained. We also analyzed recurrence-free and overall survival rates to evaluate the oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 149.44±37.59 minutes; none of the patients required conversion to laparotomy during surgery. The average postoperative hospital stay was 7.57±5.69 days. On final pathologic analysis, the mean proximal resection margin was 1.97±1.68 cm. No patients had an involved proximal resection margin. Twenty-seven patients (16.17%) had postoperative complications; of them, 6 patients (3.59%) had Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 or higher complications, all within 1 month. The median follow-up duration was 54.35 months. The 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 98.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The overall survival rate was 97.1% at both 3 and 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that totally laparoscopic near-total gastrectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for treating the upper-third early gastric cancer. Further, in the current study, the procedure demonstrated a favorable oncological outcome for a relatively long follow-up period and large sample size.

Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The extent of optimal gastric resection for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) continues to remain controversial, and a final consensus is yet to be met. The current study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) of proximal gastrectomy (PG) versus total gastrectomy (TG) in the treatment of PGC through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for articles published in English since database establishment to October 2019. Evaluated endpoints were perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and long-term survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2,896 patients in 25 full-text articles were included, of which one was a prospective randomized study, one was a clinical phase III trial, and the rest were retrospective comparative studies. The PG group showed a higher incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 2.21 [95% CI: 1.08-4.50]; p = 0.03) and reflux symptoms (OR = 3.33 [95% CI: 1.85-5.99]; p < 0.001) when compared with the TG group, while no difference was found in PG patients with double-tract reconstruction (DTR). The retrieved lymph nodes were clearly more in the TG group (WMD = -10.46 [95% CI: -12.76 to -8.17]; p < 0.001). The PG group was associated with a better 5-year OS relative to TG with 11 included studies (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.03-1.77]; p = 0.03). After stratification for early gastric cancer and PG with DTR groups, however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (OR = 1.35 [95% CI: 0.59-2.45]; p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, PG was associated with a visible improved long-term survival outcome for all irrespective of tumor stage, while a similar 5-year OS for only early gastric cancer patients between the 2 groups. Future randomized clinical trials of esophagojejunostomy techniques, such as DTR following PG, are expected to prevent postoperative complications and assist surgeons in the choice of surgical approach for PGC patients.

Impact of endoscopic resection on the choice of surgical procedure in patients with additional laparoscopic gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Additional surgery is recommended for patients with noncurative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. Additional resection requires the excision of an area larger than that of the resected mucosa in ESD, which is larger than the lesion, with convergence of the gastric mucosa due to scarring. Thus, the selection of the surgical procedure for lesion removal in specific areas can be affected by ESD. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the impact of ESD on the selection of additional gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer in the boundary area between the upper third and middle third of the stomach (UM boundary region).

METHODS

Between January 2013 and June 2018, laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed in 89 patients with cT1N0M0 gastric cancer located only in the UM boundary region. The patients' backgrounds and surgical and pathological results were retrospectively investigated. The predictive factors for performing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) were evaluated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 89 patients, 23 patients underwent ESD before surgery. LDG was significantly less often performed in the ESD-surgery group than in the surgery-only group (34.8% vs. 72.7%; p = 0.003). Preoperative ESD was an independent negative predictor of LDG (odds ratio = 0.266; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative ESD has an impact on the selection of the type of additional gastrectomy, including reducing the conduct of LDG for early gastric cancer in the UM boundary region.

Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function-preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube-like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double-flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double-tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected.

Long-Term Survival after Minimally Invasive Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Patients in the United States and China

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the long-term survival of patients undergoing minimally invasive gastrectomy and those undergoing open gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) in the United States and China.

METHODS

Data on patients with GA who underwent gastrectomy without neoadjuvant therapy were retrieved from prospectively maintained databases at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FMUUH). Using propensity score-matching (PSM), equally sized cohorts of patients with similar clinical and pathologic characteristics who underwent minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy were selected. The primary end point of the study was 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The study identified 479 patients who underwent gastrectomy at MSKCC between 2000 and 2012 and 2935 patients who underwent gastrectomy at FMUUH between 2006 and 2014. Of the total 3432 patients, 1355 underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy, and 2059 underwent open gastrectomy. All the patients had at least 5 years of potential follow-up evaluation. Before PSM, most patient characteristics differed significantly between the patients undergoing the two types of surgery. After PSM, each cohort included 889 matched patients, and the actual 5-year OS did not differ significantly between the two cohorts, with an OS rate of 54% after minimally invasive gastrectomy and 50.4% after open gastrectomy (p = 0.205). Subgroup analysis confirmed that survival was similar between surgical cohorts among the patients for each stage of GA and for those undergoing distal versus total/proximal gastrectomy. In the multivariable analysis, surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

After PSM of U.S. and Chinese patients with GA undergoing gastrectomy, long-term survival did not differ significantly between the patients undergoing minimally invasive gastrectomy and those undergoing open gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique versus laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer

Background

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double‐flap technique (LPG‐DFT) and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LSTG) may replace laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for proximal early gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate short‐ and long‐term outcomes after LPG‐DFT and LSTG.

Methods

Patients who underwent LPG‐DFT or LSTG at the Cancer Institute Hospital in Tokyo between January 2006 and April 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Operative procedures were selected based on the distance from the cardia to the proximal boundary of the tumour, tumour location and predicted remnant stomach volume. Patient characteristics, surgical data, markers of postoperative nutritional status, such as blood chemistry and bodyweight loss, and endoscopic findings were compared between procedures. The main study outcome was nutritional status.

Results

A total of 161 patients (LPG‐DFT 51, LSTG 110) were included. Types of postoperative complication occurring more than 30 days after surgery differed between the two procedures. Remnant stomach ulcers, including anastomotic ulcers, were observed only after LPG‐DFT, whereas complications involving the small intestine, such as internal hernia or small bowel obstruction, occurred more frequently after LSTG. Values for total protein, albumin, prealbumin and bodyweight loss were comparable between the two procedures at 36 months after surgery. Haemoglobin concentrations were higher after LPG‐DFT than after LSTG at 24 months (13·4 versus 12·8 g/dl respectively; P = 0·045) and 36 months (13·5 versus 12·8 g/dl; P = 0·007) after surgery. The rate of Los Angeles grade B or more severe reflux oesophagitis was comparable.

Conclusion

LPG‐DFT and LSTG for proximal early gastric cancer have similar outcomes, but different types of complication.

Shorter Survival of Patients with Upper-Third Gastric Cancer Preoperatively Diagnosed as Stage IA Compared with Those with Middle to Lower Lesions

BACKGROUND

Although preoperatively diagnosed stage IA (cT1N0) gastric cancer includes pathologically advanced disease, patients with cT1N0 middle- to lower-third gastric cancer (MLTG) experience favorable outcomes even if they undergo gastrectomy with limited lymph node dissection; however, whether this is true for upper-third gastric cancer (UTG) patients is unknown. In this study, we examined the survival of patients with cT1N0 UTG compared with patients with MLTG.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data for 1707 consecutive patients with cT1N0 gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 2006 and 2013. Patients were divided into the UTG or MLTG groups, and clinicopathological characteristics and survival were compared between the groups. Factors affecting survival were identified using multivariate analysis. Survival was calculated according to pathological findings.

RESULTS

The patient group included 334 UTG patients and 1373 MLTG patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of UTG patients was significantly shorter than that of MLTG patients, and UTG was identified as an independent prognostic factor of cT1N0 gastric cancer. Among UTG cases, the OS of pT2-4 or pN1-3 was significantly shorter than that of pT1 or pN0 disease. No significant differences were found between such diseases in MLTG. All relapses in UTG were distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

cT1N0 UTG with pT2-4 or pN1-3 are prognostic indicators of shorter OS, although MLTG of either disease is associated with favorable prognosis. Thus, UTG is an independent prognostic factor in cT1N0 gastric cancer; however, limited dissection is acceptable for cT1N0 UTG because relapses occur at distant sites.