Keyhole epilepsy surgery: corticoamygdalohippocampectomy for mesial temporal sclerosis

SupraPetrous InfraTemporal Approach: A Supplemental Approach to Supracerebellar Infratentorial for Inferior Amygdala and Hippocampal Head Access-A Cadaveric Study With Case Illustrations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Access to the amygdala and hippocampus (A/H) is complex. To address the limitations and invasiveness of traditional approaches, including the Transsylvian, Subtemporal, and Supracerebellar infratentorial approaches, we developed the suprapetrous infratemporal (SPIT) approach. This study describes the nuances of this approach in both cadaveric studies and clinical cases.

METHODS

Three unilateral exposures were performed using microscopic and endoscopic methodologies in the SPIT approach. After cadaveric investigation, this approach was successfully implemented in representative clinical cases.

RESULTS

The SPIT approach enabled direct access to the inferior A/H, circumventing the requirement for temporal lobe retraction and detachment of the temporal lobe from the dura through a subtemporal route by drilling the upper part of the mastoid, consequently mitigating tension on the vein of Labbé. This enabled a bottom-up view because one would gain with a zygomatic osteotomy and forward projection like a mini-posterior petrosal view by using a transmastoid view, without cutting down the zygomatic arch and opening the dura subtemporally, limiting patient pain and preventing case comorbidity. The SPIT approach was performed in 2 cases of mesial temporal cavernoma presenting with seizures. The lesion was visualized intraoperatively and was successfully removed in these cases. The postoperative course was excellent with no complications, and gross total resection was radiographically confirmed with Engel Class 1a seizure freedom.

CONCLUSION

The SPIT approach is a complementary approach for inferior A/H disease, combining the combined middle fossa approach modified for intradural pathology. Limited drilling of the upper aspect of the mastoid with a medial dural opening at the level of the arcuate eminence provides a direct trajectory with minimal brain retraction. Additional research encompassing a larger patient cohort and extended follow-up periods is required to substantiate the advantages of SPIT in the management of inferior A/H lesions.

Mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors: a comparison with conventional craniotomy in 306 patients harboring non-dural based lesions

The use of a mini-craniotomy approach involving linear skin incision and a bone flap of about 3 cm has been reported for several neurosurgical diseases, such as aneurysms or cranial base tumors. More superficial lesions, including intra-axial tumors, may occasionally raise concerns due to insufficient control of the tumor boundaries. The convenience of a minimally invasive approach to intrinsic brain tumors was evaluated by comparing 161 patients who underwent mini-craniotomy (MC) for intra-axial brain tumors with a group of 145 patients operated on by the same surgical team through a conventional craniotomy (CC). Groups were propensity-matched for age, preoperative condition, size and location of the tumor, and pathological diagnosis. Results were analyzed focusing on operative time, the extent of resection, clinical outcome, hospitalization time, and time to start adjuvant therapy. Mini-craniotomy was equally effective in terms of extent of resection (GTR: 70.9% in the MC group vs 70.5% in the CC group) but had shorter operative time (average: 165 min in the MC group vs 205 min in the CC group p < 0.001) and lower rate of postoperative complications both superficial (1.03% vs 6.5% in the CC group p = 0.009) and deep (4% in the MC group vs 5.5% in the CC group p = 0,47). No relationship was found between the size or location of the tumor and resection rate. The MC group had reduced hospitalization time (average: 5.8 days vs 7.6 in CC group p < 0.001) and faster access to adjuvant therapies. 92.5% of the MC patients, which were scheduled for treatment, started radiotherapy within 8 weeks after surgery as opposed to 84.1% in the CC group (p = 0.04). These findings support the increasing use of mini-craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors.

Surgery procedures in temporal lobe epilepsies

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common cause of refractory epilepsy amenable for surgical treatment and seizure control. Surgery for TLE is a safe and effective strategy. The seizure-free rate after surgical resection in patients with mesial or neocortical TLE is about 70%. Resective surgery has an advantage over stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of seizure outcomes for mesial TLE patients. Both techniques have similar results for safety, cognitive outcomes, and associated costs. Stereotactic radiosurgery should therefore be seen as an alternative to open surgery for patients with contraindications for or with reluctance to undergo open surgery. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has also shown promising results as a curative technique in mesial TLE but needs to be more deeply evaluated. Brain-responsive stimulation represents a palliative treatment option for patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior mesial temporal lobe resection. Overall, despite the expansion of innovative techniques in recent years, resective surgery remains the reference treatment for TLE and should be proposed as the first-line surgical modality. In the future, ultrasound therapies could become a credible therapeutic option for refractory TLE patients.

Bur Hole-Based Resections of Intrinsic Brain Tumors with Exoscopic Visualization

BACKGROUND

 The primary goal of brain tumor surgery is maximal safe resection while avoiding iatrogenic injury. As surgical technology increases, it is becoming more possible to resect these lesions using minimally invasive approaches. While keyhole surgeries are being advocated, the lower limit of these approaches is unclear. Bur hole-based approaches may represent a standardized minimally invasive approach. The exoscope may provide increased visualization over standard microscopic visualization, making this approach possible. This approach has yet to be described strictly for intra-axial brain tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 All patients who underwent a bur hole-based surgery of an intra-axial tumor with exoscopic visualization by the senior author from January 2018 to December 2019 were prospectively identified and patient information and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

 Fifteen consecutive patients underwent surgical resection of an intrinsic brain tumor using a bur hole-based approach with exoscopic visualization. The average ± standard deviation age was 57.9 ± 24.2 years. The pathology was a metastatic brain tumor in eight patients (53%), low-grade glioma in four patients (27%), and high-grade glioma in three patients (20%). The average percent resection was 100 ± 1%, where 14 (93%) underwent gross total resection. Following surgery, the median (interquartile range) Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score was 90 (90-90), where 11 (73%) and four patients (27%) had improved and stable KPS, respectively. Zero patients had complications. The average length of stay following surgery was 1.4 ± 0.5 days, where nine patients (60%) were discharged on postoperative day 1.

CONCLUSION

 This study shows that intra-axial tumors can be resected through a bur hole-based approach with exoscopic visualization with extensive resection, minimal morbidity, and early discharge rates.

Comparison of the keyhole trans-middle temporal gyrus approach and transsylvian approach for selective amygdalohippocampectomy: A single-center experience

Several approach routes exist for selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH); however, previous reports regarding a comparison of these routes are limited. Here, we compared trans-middle temporal gyrus (T2) SAH and transsylvian (TS) SAH in terms of seizure outcome, visual-field defect, memory function, and operation time in our institution. This retrospective study examined the data of 16 patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Six patients underwent trans-T2 SAH and 10 patients underwent TS SAH between July 2014 and February 2019 in Osaka City University Hospital. In trans-T2 SAH, we performed a keyhole temporal craniotomy and a small corticotomy on T2. In TS SAH, we performed a 1.5 cm corticotomy along the inferior periinsular sulcus after opening the sylvian fissure. Amygdalohippocampectomy after reaching the inferior horn of the lateral ventricle was performed in the same manner in both procedures. The seizure outcome, visual-field defect, memory function, and operation time were retrospectively compared between the procedures. Seizure-free outcomes were achieved for six patients in the trans-T2 SAH and eight patients in the TS SAH group. There were no significant differences in the seizure outcome, visual-field defect, and memory function. The operation time was significantly shorter for trans-T2 SAH than TS SAH. The postoperative scar was less conspicuous for trans-T2 SAH. Trans-T2 SAH and TS SAH were comparable in terms of the seizure outcome, visual-field defect, and memory function. The operation time and length of the skin incision were shorter for trans-T2 SAH, suggesting that it may be preferable for general epilepsy surgeons.

[microsurgery 'burr hole' for intracranial tumors and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy]

PURPOSE

In recent years, neurosurgery has been characterized by a clear tendency towards the development of minimally invasive and less traumatic surgical approaches. To minimize the degree of injury to the brain tissue, we have proposed burr hole-based microsurgical approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the period between February 2016 and February 2019, more than 500 microsurgical interventions were performed through a 14 mm burr hole using a technique that we called burr-hole microneurosurgery; to date, 200 of these have been analyzed. The age of patients varied from 16 to 79 years (median, 38 years). Female patients predominated - 1.6:1. Surgery for intracranial lesions with various locations was performed in 176 cases; in the remaining 24 cases, patients with hippocampal sclerosis underwent selective amygdalohippocampectomy.

RESULTS

Various surgical approaches were used: transcortical approach in 81 (40.5%) cases; retro-sigmoid approach in 38 (19%); sub-temporal approach in 32 (16%); infratentorial supracerebellar approach in 25 (12.5%); interhemispheric approach in 17 (8.5%); telovelar approach in 5 (2.5%); trans-eyebrow approach in 2 cases. The resection degree was evaluated in 167 patients with planned maximum tumor resection. Resection was total and almost total in 145 (87%) patients, subtotal in 15 (9%), and partial in 7 (4%). The surgery duration varied from 35 to 300 min (mean, 80 min). The extubation time after surgery ranged from 5 min to 5 days (mean, 70 min). In 195 (97.5%) cases, patients were verticalized within the first 3 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The proposed burr hole technique enables successful surgery in patients with various intracranial pathologies, using a smaller trepanation window compared to that in keyhole surgery. The proposed burr hole technique minimizes injury to the brain substance, significantly reduces patient's exposure to anesthesia, and decreases the entire duration of surgery.

Minimally Invasive Technique (Nummular Craniotomy) for Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Comparison of 2 Approaches

OBJECTIVE

To describe our series of a minimally invasive technique using a small scalp incision and keyhole craniotomy for the removal of mesial temporal lobe structures through a transcortical approach in patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Studies that directly compare the clinical outcomes between minimally invasive and conventional techniques are scarce, and this information is lacking in the literature.

METHODS

The study enrolled 73 consecutive patients with refractory MTLE and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis; 30 patients were operated on with standard frontotemporal craniotomy between 2010 and 2013 and 43 patients were operated with a minimally invasive craniotomy (nummular craniotomy) between 2014 and 2016. The preoperative evaluation included clinical history, physical examination, video-electroencephalography, neuropsychologic assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging including thin-section coronal sequences.

RESULTS

There were no deaths in either group. Postoperative complications in the standard frontotemporal craniotomy group included temporal muscle atrophy (n = 4; 13.3%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (n = 1; 3.3%), and wound infection (n = 1; 3.3%). No complications were observed in the keyhole craniotomy group. There was no between-group difference in postoperative seizure control. The mean Engel class I seizure-free outcome was 90.4% in the standard frontotemporal craniotomy group and 90.7% in the nummular craniotomy group (P > 0.05). Lengths of hospitalization (2.81 vs. 4.37 days, P < 0.001) and operative time (85.79 vs. 142.73 minutes, P < 0.001) were lower in the keyhole than in the standard frontotemporal craniotomy group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The nummular technique was associated with faster recovery, early hospital discharge, and fewer complications than the standard technique. No differences were observed in postoperative seizure control. Keyhole craniotomy is a safe, easy, and effective treatment option for medically intractable MTLE.

Method for temporal keyhole lobectomies in resection of low- and high-grade gliomas

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe a method of resecting temporal gliomas through a keyhole lobectomy and to share the results of using this technique.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of data obtained in all patients in whom the senior author performed resection of temporal gliomas between 2012 and 2015. The authors describe their technique for resecting dominant and nondominant gliomas, using both awake and asleep keyhole craniotomy techniques.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included in the study. Twenty-six patients (50%) had not received prior surgery. Seventeen patients (33%) were diagnosed with WHO Grade II/III tumors, and 35 patients (67%) were diagnosed with a glioblastoma. Thirty tumors were left sided (58%). Thirty procedures (58%) were performed while the patient was awake. The median extent of resection was 95%, and at least 90% of the tumor was resected in 35 cases (67%). Five of 49 patients (10%) with clinical follow-up experienced permanent deficits, including 3 patients (6%) with hydrocephalus requiring placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt and 2 patients (4%) with weakness. Three patients experienced early postoperative anomia, but no patients had a new speech deficit at clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors provide their experience using a keyhole lobectomy for resecting temporal gliomas. Their data demonstrate the feasibility of using less invasive techniques to safely and aggressively treat these tumors.

Surgical Considerations of Intractable Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Surgery of temporal lobe epilepsy is the best opportunity for seizure freedom in medically intractable patients. The surgical approach has evolved to recognize the paramount importance of the mesial temporal structures in the majority of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy who have a seizure origin in the mesial temporal structures. For those individuals with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, a selective amygdalohippocampectomy surgery can be done that provides an excellent opportunity for seizure freedom and limits the resection to temporal lobe structures primarily involved in seizure genesis.

Factors predicting the outcome following surgical treatment of mesial temporal epilepsy due to mesial temporal sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) is the most common disease found in an epilepsy surgery series. Early age of onset, a history of febrile convulsions, epileptiform discharges on EEG, duration of epilepsy, number of generalized seizures and severity of psychiatric disorders are possible prognostic factors in patients with MTS.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to review the clinical, semiotic, psychological, electrophysiological and neuroradiological researches and relate their findings to the prognosis of patients with MTS who underwent anteromedial temporal lobectomy (ATL).

METHODS

Of 1,214 patients evaluated for surgery in the epilepsy Center of Faculdade de Medicina de São Jose do Rio Preto (FAMERP), a tertiary Brazilian epilepsy center, 400 underwent ATL for MTS. Examinations and clinical data were analyzed and compared with the Engel Outcome Classification.

RESULTS

Of all the items analyzed, the MRI showed the greatest influence on patient outcome. As for the clinical evaluation and pathological antecedents, age at surgery, epilepsy duration, perinatal insults, family history of epilepsy, febrile seizures, neuropsychological abnormalities and presence of generalized tonic-clonic seizure all had statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In order to identify the most appropriate candidates for ATL, it is very important to consider the prognostic factors associated with a favorable outcome for counseling patients in daily practice.