Comparison of a bolt-connected external ventricular drain with a tunneled external ventricular drain - a narrative review and meta-analysis

Pathophysiology and Prevention of Ventriculostomy-Related Infections: A Review

This qualitative review aims to summarize current knowledge on ventriculostomy-related infection (VRI) pathophysiology and its prevention. VRI generally occurs at day 10, mainly because of Gram-positive cocci , after a cerebrospinal fluid leak. Skin microbiota and biofilm seem to play a major role in VRI pathogenesis. Colonization of external ventricular drain by biofilm is universal and occurs quickly after catheter insertion. However, pathogens from the skin are more often associated with VRI than commensal bacteria. A review of proposed preventive measures shows that none has proven to be fully efficient. Periprocedural and prolonged systemic prophylactic antimicrobials have not shown to prevent VRIs and may promote the emergence of more resistant or pathogenic strains. Antimicrobial and silver-impregnated external ventricular drains, although promising, have not demonstrated preventive effects and may modify bacterial ecology. These results are consistent with the proposed pathophysiology. Finally, we will present a few propositions for future research that may help in improving our knowledge and thus better prevent VRIs. Until then, given the available data, limiting the duration of ventricular drainage may be the most attainable option to prevent VRIs.

A systematic review of reviews on ventriculostomy related infection definitions: A fundamental problem

Despite being a common, well-recognized and important complication to External Ventricular Drainage (EVD), a consensus definition for Ventriculostomy Related Infections (VRI) has not yet been established. We conducted a review to qualitatively assess definition heterogeneity and objectivity among Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs); and investigated systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews of the literature for definition citation accuracy and common methodological approaches and points of discussion related to VRI definitions. RCTs were grouped into arbitrarily chosen infection rate brackets to examine the hypothesized correlation between broader definitions and higher infection rates in RCTs. A literature search was conducted via Ovid in the Embase, MedLine and Cochrane databases from all years until the 8th of January 2025. Using Covidence, two authors (MH, AA) independently evaluated records, including studies that had ≥ 1 VRI definitions and numerical VRI rates. We identified 12 definitions in 13 RCTs, documenting pronounced disagreement. Cumulative rates for "definitive" VRI (8.4%) were lower than "suspected" VRI (13.5%). Qualitatively assessed, studies with narrow definitions presented lower VRI rates. All 17/17 meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and 15/19 literature reviews cited ≥ 1 definition inaccurately. Trial results may change based on definition choice. Definition heterogeneity was not sufficiently accounted for in meta-analyses. All literature-based studies were confounded by definition heterogeneity. Previously reported findings based on meta-analytical methodologies may be invalid, and inaccurately presented definitions could give a false impression of trial comparability. A consensus set of definitions are necessary to allow comparison between studies, and should be constructed to account for the intended use since sensitivity and specificity may have different weight depending on the context.

A novel minimally invasive neurosurgical cranial fixation device for improved accuracy of intraventricular catheter placement: an experimental animal study

BACKGROUND

External ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is one of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures. Herein, we introduce a new concept of a cranial fixation device for insertion of EVDs, that reduces reliance on freehand placement and drilling techniques and provides a simple, minimally invasive approach that provides strong fixation to minimal thickness skulls.

METHODS

An experimental device for catheter insertion and fixation was designed and tested in both ex-vivo and in-vivo conditions to assess accurate cannulation of the ventricle and to test the strength of fixation to the skull. The ex-vivo experiments were conducted at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU) in Be'er Sheva, Israel. These experiments included functionality bench testing and pullout force measurements for the ball mechanism and catheter fixation. For the in-vivo experiments the fixation device was initially tested at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) in Cincinnati, Ohio on one day of life 1 (DOL 1) male control lamb. Additional experiments were conducted on 3 hydrocephalic DOL 0 lambs (1 male 2 female) at the Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre (JUMISC) in Caceres, Spain. The hydrocephalic animal model used for this study was created with in utero intracisternal injection of BioGlue in fetal lambs. The catheter insertion trajectory was determined using MR imaging to assess the device's impact on the placement accuracy. The fixation device was evaluated on reaching the ventricle and enabling extraction of CSF for all 7 fixations placed. For 5 of the fixation devices, post-mortem pullout force was measured. The general functionality of the device was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In the experiments, 7/7 (100%) catheter trajectories successfully reached the ventricle without any apparent complications related to the device or the procedure. The cranial fixation device base demonstrated significant strength in withstanding an average pull-out force of 4.18kgf (STD[Formula: see text]0.72, N = 5) without detachment from the subject's skull for all 5 devices included in this test. Additionally, the EVD catheter pull test was conducted with the addition of a safety loop which did not allow movement of the EVD to a force of 3.6kgf. At this force the catheter tore but did not release from its fixation point.

CONCLUSION

The newly designed experimental device demonstrates initial proof of concept from ex vivo and in vivo testing. It appears suitable for accurate ventricular catheter placement and cranial fixation.

External ventricular drain migration into the cisterna magna: A case report

Background

External ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is a common neurosurgical procedure used to treat acute hydrocephalus. In this report, we present a rare case of an EVD that was initially correctly placed within the frontal horn but subsequently migrated to the cisterna magna, the first to be reported in the literature.

Case Description

A 46-year-old man with postoperative meningitis and hydrocephalus underwent EVD insertion using an improvised EVD system. The EVD was also used as a route for the administration of intraventricular antibiotics. The patient was restless and agitated during his treatment, causing him to move his head frequently. Serial computed tomography scans showed that the EVD was initially correctly placed within the frontal horn and then migrated to the cisterna magna.

Conclusion

Inward catheter migration is a rare complication of EVD insertion and is an important concern since it may cause neurologic deficits and potentially harmful sequelae. We have also highlighted measures that can be taken to prevent a similar event in the future.

Ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) in patients with acute brain injury-a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) is common after external ventricular drains (EVD) insertion but is difficult to diagnose in patients with acute brain injury. Previously, we proposed a set of criteria for ruling out VAI in traumatic brain injury. This study aimed to validate these criteria. For exploratory purposes, we sought to develop and validate a score for VAI risk assessment in patients with different types of severe acute brain injury.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adults with acute brain injury who received an EVD and in whom CSF samples were taken over a period of 57 months. As standard non-coated bolt-connected EVDs were used. The predictive performance of biomarkers was analyzed as defined previously. A multivariable regression model was performed with five variables.

RESULTS

A total of 683 patients with acute brain injury underwent EVD placement and had 1272 CSF samples; 92 (13.5%) patients were categorized as culture-positive VAI, 130 (19%) as culture-negative VAI, and 461 (67.5%) as no VAI. A low CSF WBC/RBC ratio (< 0.037), high CSF/plasma glucose ratio (> 0.6), and low CSF protein (< 0.5g/L) showed a positive predictive value of 0.09 (95%CI, 0.05-0.13). In the multivariable logistic regression model, days to sample (OR 1.09; 95%CI, 1.03-1.16) and CSF WBC/RBC ratio (OR 34.86; 95%CI, 3.94-683.15) were found to predict VAI.

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute brain injury and an EVD, our proposed combined cut-off for ruling out VAI performed satisfactorily. Days to sample and CSF WBC/RBC ratio were found independent predictors for VAI in the multivariable logistic regression model.

Long Tunneled External Ventricular Drains with Shunt Valves: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

External ventricular drain (EVD) is a basic operation in neurosurgery. Due to the limitation of its safe duration, some patients need to receive multiple drainage operations. We describe the long tunneled EVD (LTEVD) with shunt valves that effectively avoid multiple operations as a technical note.

METHODS

The difference is that the middle part of the drainage tube is connected by an externalized shunt valve. The drainage tube is buried under the skin and the outlet is in the abdomen. The technique and more details are described.

RESULTS

The connection between the LTEVD and the shunt valve is simple and the required materials are easily accessible. Externalized valves allow the cerebrospinal fluid to be visualized and more controllable, making it easier for physicians to manage the cerebrospinal fluid. No drainage tube failure or secondary infection was observed. The indwelling time of the drainage tube was greatly extended.

CONCLUSIONS

LTEVD is effective and simple. It allows visual control of drainage flow, prolonging catheter indwelling time and eliminating the need for multiple surgeries.

Construction and validation of infection risk model for patients with external ventricular drainage: a multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a life-saving neurosurgical procedure, of which the most concerning complication is EVD-related infection (ERI). We aimed to construct and validate an ERI risk model and establish a monographic chart.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the adult EVD patients in four medical centers and split the data into a training and a validation set. We selected features via single-factor logistic regression and trained the ERI risk model using multi-factor logistic regression. We further evaluated the model discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness, with internal and external validation to assess the reproducibility and generalizability. We finally visualized the model as a nomogram and created an online calculator (dynamic nomogram).

RESULTS

Our research enrolled 439 EVD patients and found 75 cases (17.1%) had ERI. Diabetes, drainage duration, site leakage, and other infections were independent risk factors that we used to fit the ERI risk model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Brier score of the model were 0.758 and 0.118, and these indicators' values were similar when internally validated. In external validation, the model discrimination had a moderate decline, of which the AUC was 0.720. However, the Brier score was 0.114, suggesting no degradation in overall performance. Spiegelhalter's Z-test indicated that the model had adequate calibration when validated internally or externally (P = 0.464 vs. P = 0.612). The model was transformed into a nomogram with an online calculator built, which is available through the website: https://wang-cdutcm.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/ .

CONCLUSIONS

The present study developed an infection risk model for EVD patients, which is freely accessible and may serve as a simple decision tool in the clinic.

Comparison of External Ventricular Drains with Ventricular Access Devices for the Emergency Management of Adult Hydrocephalus

OBJECTIVE

We compared external ventricular drains (EVDs) with percutaneous continuous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage via ventricular access devices (VADs) for the acute management of hydrocephalus in adults.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all ventricular drains inserted for a new diagnosis of hydrocephalus into noninfected CSF over four years. We compared infection rates, return to theatre, and patient outcome between EVDs and VADs. We explored the effect of duration of drainage, frequency of sampling, hydrocephalus aetiology, and catheter location on these outcomes using multivariable logistic regression modelling.

RESULTS

We included 179 drains (76 EVDs and 103 VADs). EVDs were associated with a higher rate of unplanned return to theatre for replacement or revision (27/76, 36%, vs. 4/103, 4%, OR: 13.4 95%CI: 4.3-55.8). However, infection rates were higher in VADs (13/103, 13% vs. 5/76, 7%, OR: 2.0, 95%CI: 0.65-7.7). EVDs were 91% antibiotic impregnated whereas VADs were 98% nonimpregnated. In multivariable analysis, infection was associated with duration of drainage (median: 11 days prior to infection for infected drains vs. 7 days total for noninfected drains), but not drain type (VADs vs. EVDs OR: 1.6, 95%CI: 0.5-6).

CONCLUSIONS

EVDs had a higher rate of unplanned revisions but a lower infection rate compared to VADs. However, in multivariable analysis choice of drain type was not associated with infection. We suggest a prospective comparison of antibiotic impregnated VADs and EVDs using similar sampling protocols to assess whether VADs or EVDs for acute hydrocephalus have a lower overall complication rate.

Tunneled antibiotic-impregnated vs. bolt-connected, non-coated external ventricular drainage: a comparison of complications

Background

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a common emergency neurosurgical procedure, but it is not free of adverse events. The aim of this study is to compare the complication rate of two frequently used EVD types, namely, tunneled antibiotic-impregnated catheters (Bactiseal©) and bolt-connected non-coated devices (Camino©).

Methods

All EVDs placed between 1 March 2015 and 31 December 2017 were registered. Procedures performed with any catheter different from Bactiseal© or Camino© EVD with incomplete follow-up and those EVDs placed due to infectious disease were excluded. Demographic and clinical variables, as well as the overall complication rate (infection, hemorrhage, obstruction, malposition of the catheter, and involuntary pull-out of the device) and the need for replacement of the EVD, were collected.

Results

A total of 77 EVDs were finally considered for analysis (40 Bactiseal® and 37 Camino®). There was a statistically significant difference in diagnosis and also in the location of the procedure, as more bolt-connected EVD was placed outside the operating room (97.3 vs. 23.5%, p < 0.001) due to emergent pathologies such as vascular diseases and spontaneous hemorrhages. In the univariate analysis, a statistically significantly higher rate of catheter involuntary pull-out (29.7 vs. 7.5%, p = 0.012) and the need for EVD replacement (32.4 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.035) was found in the Camino cohort. However, those differences could not be confirmed with multivariable analysis, which showed no association between the type of catheter and any of the studied complications. Ventriculostomy duration was identified as a risk factor for infection (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.18).

Conclusion

No significant differences were observed regarding infection, hemorrhage, obstruction, malposition, involuntary catheter pull-out, and the need for EVD replacement when comparing non-impregnated bolt-connected EVDs (Camino®) with tunneled antibiotic-impregnated catheters (Bactiseal®). The duration of EVD was associated with an increased risk of infection.

Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage with External Ventricular Drainage and Fibrinolysis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications and Outcome

BACKGROUND

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a key factor in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) but associated with risks and complications. Intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) has been proposed to improve clinical outcome and reduce complications of EVD treatment. The following review and metaanalysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of IVH treatment with external ventricular drainage (EVD) and intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) with regards to complications and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines were followed preparing this review. Studies included in the meta-analysis were compared using forest plots and the related odds ratios.

RESULTS

After a literature search, 980 articles were identified and 65 and underwent full-text review. Forty-two articles were included in the review and meta-analysis. We found that bolted and antibiotic-coated catheters were superior to tunnelled/uncoated catheters (P < 0.001) and antibiotic- vs. silver-impregnated catheters (P < 0.001]) in preventing infection. Shunt dependency was related to the volume of blood in the ventricles but unaffected by IVF (P = 0.98). IVF promoted hematoma clearance, decreased mortality (22.4% vs. 40.9% with IVF vs. no IVF, respectively, P < 0.00001), improved good functional outcomes (47.2% [IVF] vs. 38.3% [no IVF], P = 0.03), and reduced the rate of catheter occlusion from 37.3% without IVF to 10.6% with IVF (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

We present evidence and best practice recommendations for the treatment of IVH with EVD and intraventricular fibrinolysis. Our analysis further provides a comprehensive quantitative reference of the most relevant clinical endpoints for future studies on novel IVH technologies and treatments.

Mechanical Complications of External Ventricular and Lumbar Drains

BACKGROUND

External ventricular drain (EVD) and lumbar drain insertion are 2 of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures worldwide for acute hydrocephalus. Mechanical complications, such as obstruction or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, are often seen and may contribute toward significant patient morbidity. Different CSF drainage methods are advocated to reduce the incidence of complications, but evidence regarding comparative effectiveness is limited.

METHODS

In this single-center prospective cohort study, the incidence of mechanical complications and associated interventional factors, including choice of drain, collecting system, and location, were studied in patients requiring CSF diversion for acute hydrocephalus. Univariate analyses were performed to explore trends within the data, followed by a repeated-measures mixed-effects regression to determine the independent influence of drain device on mechanical failure.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients required CSF diversion between January 2020 and March 2021, via 3 different drain types (lumbar drain, tunneled, and bolted EVD) and 2 collection systems (LiquoGuard 7 and AccuDrain), performed in either theater or intensive care. Twenty-one patients (39%) experienced a mechanical complication, with blockage being the most common. Multivariate analyses showed that bolted EVDs (odds ratio, 0.08; confidence interval, 0.01-0.58) and LiquoGuards (OR, 0.23; CI, 0.08-0.69) were significantly associated with fewer mechanical complications compared with tunneled EVDs and gravity-based collection systems, respectively (P ≤ 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Drain device has an influence on the occurrence of EVD-related complications. These preliminary findings suggest that choosing bolted EVDs and motor-assisted drainage can reduce drain-associated mechanical failure. A randomized controlled trial comparing drain devices is required to confirm these findings.