A single-center analysis of the survival benefits of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer

Completion of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for biliary tract cancer: A single center experience

BACKGROUNDS

A recent randomized control trial (JCOG1202; ASCOT trial) demonstrated the efficacy of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy (ASC) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) after surgical resection; however, the significance of the completion of ASC in the real-world setting remains unknown.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for biliary tract cancer (BTC) from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, patients who underwent ASC were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether ASC was completed: the completion group and the non-completion group. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 223 patients with BTC who underwent surgical resection, 75 patients who underwent ASC were included for analysis. Among them, 48 (64.0 %) completed the intended ASC course, while 27 cases (36.0 %) discontinued the treatment. The most common reason for the discontinuation was adverse event (n = 16, 59.3 %), followed by disease recurrence (n = 9, 33.3 %). Patients in the completion group showed significantly better overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) compared to the non-completion group. Further, after excluding the patients in the non-completion group who discontinued ASC due to disease recurrence, the significance of ASC completion was retained for both OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

The completion of ASC was associated with improved prognosis in patients with BTC after surgical resection. The achievement of ASC should be the goal after surgical resection, while further study may be warranted regarding the resistance of ASC.

Long-Term Oncological Control by Repeated Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Exhibiting Atypical Marker Expression of CK7-CK20+: A Case Report

There are few reports of repeated liver resections being performed multiple times for intrahepatic recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We performed five minimally invasive liver resections and two minimally invasive lung resections for ICC with metachronous intrahepatic recurrence and lung metastases. Pathological examination revealed that all resected tumors were moderately differentiated mass-forming ICC with immunohistochemical marker expression of CK7 negative and CK20 positive. We present this as a rare case of ICC with atypical marker expression in which long-term tumor control was achieved with multiple minimally invasive liver resections over 47 months from the initial diagnosis.

Predictive risk-score model to select patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma for adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model to identify individuals most likely to derive overall survival (OS) benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after hepatic resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatic resection of ICC between 1990 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. Factors associated with worse OS were identified and incorporated into an online predictive model to identify patients most likely to benefit from AC.

RESULTS

Among 726 patients, 189 (26.0%) individuals received AC. Factors associated with OS on multivariable analysis included CA19-9 (Hazard Ratio [HR]1.17, 95%CI 1.04-1.31), tumor burden score (HR1.09, 95%CI 1.04-1.15), T-category (T2/3/4, HR1.73, 95%CI 1.73-2.64), nodal disease (N1, HR3.80, 95%CI 2.02-7.15), tumor grade (HR1.88, 95%CI 1.00-3.55), and morphological subtype (HR2.19, 95%CI 1.08-4.46). A weighted predictive score was devised and made available online (https://yutaka-endo.shinyapps.io/ICCrisk_model_for_AC/). Receipt of AC was associated with a survival benefit among patients at high/medium-risk (high: no AC, 0% vs. AC, 20.6%; medium: no AC, 36.4% vs. 40.8%; both p < 0.05) but not low-risk (low: no AC, 65.1% vs. AC, 65.1%; p = 0.73) tumors.

CONCLUSION

An online predictive model based on tumor characteristics may help identify which patients may benefit the most from AC following resection of ICC.

The effect and therapeutic compliance of adjuvant therapy in patients with cholangiocarcinoma after R0 resection: a retrospective study

BACKGRUOUND

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between surveillance and adjuvant therapy (AT) groups after R0 resection for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

METHODS

A total of 154 patients who underwent R0 resection for CCA at the Daegu Catholic University Medical Center between January 2010 and December 2019 were included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 899 days. There were 109 patients in the AT group and 45 patients in the surveillance group. The patients in the AT group were younger (67 years vs. 74 years, p<0.001) and included more males (64.2% vs. 46.7%, p=0.044). The proportion of patients with stage III CCA was larger in the AT group than in the surveillance group (13.8% vs. 2.2%, p=0.005). In addition, AT did not improve OS (5-year OS rate, 69.3% in the AT group vs. 64.2% in the surveillance group, p=0.806) or PFS (5-year PFS rate, 42.6% in the AT group vs. 48.9% in the surveillance group, p=0.113). In multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, stage III CCA (hazard ratio [HR], 10.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.92-40.00; p<0.001) was a significant predictor of OS. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification II (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81; p=0.005), and American Joint Committee on Cancer stages II (HR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.25-7.89; p=0.015) and III (HR, 8.08; 95% CI, 2.80-23.32; p<0.001) were independent predictors of PFS.

CONCLUSION

AT after R0 resection for CCA did not improve OS or PFS.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and causes major economic and health burdens throughout the world. Although the incidence of ICC is relatively low, an upward trend has been seen over the past few decades. Owing to the lack of specific manifestations and tools for early diagnosis, most ICC patients have relatively advanced disease at diagnosis. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy is necessary to evaluate tumor biology and downstage these patients so that appropriate candidates can be selected for radical liver resection. However, even after radical resection, the recurrence rate is relatively high and is a main cause leading to death after surgery, which makes adjuvant therapy necessary. Because of its low incidence, studies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings of ICC are lagging compared with other types of malignancy. While standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens are not available in the current guidelines due to a lack of high-level evidence, some progress has been achieved in recent years. In this review, the available literature on advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies in ICC are evaluated, and possible challenges and opportunities for clinical and translational investigations in the near future are discussed.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer: a review of clinical trials

Cancer originating in the biliary tract can be classified as bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma), gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer. Bile duct cancer is further divided to intrahepatic, perihilar and distal bile duct subtypes according to the anatomical location of the tumor. The biological characteristics of each tumor are heterogeneous. However, because of the rarity of each disease, the efficacy of new drugs has been tested in groups of patients with different biliary tract cancers. In patients with metastatic or recurrent biliary tract cancer, recent randomized clinical trials revealed the non-inferiority of gemcitabine + S-1 and the superiority of gemcitabine + cisplatin + S-1 compared with gemcitabine + cisplatin in terms of overall survival, thereby establishing a new standard treatment. In the field of adjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer, the British BILCAP (capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer) study revealed longer median overall survival in the capecitabine group than in the observation group in the per-protocol analysis (but not in the intention-to-treat analysis), bringing a shift toward postoperative management. Several other studies of adjuvant therapy are ongoing, and they may lead to reforms in treatment strategy for resectable biliary tract cancer in the future. The use of neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer is in its infancy, but it is expected to overcome the limitations of adjuvant therapy for this malignancy. In this review, we summarized the evidence available from clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer and described ongoing clinical trials.

Impact of the Preoperative C-reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio on the Long-Term Outcomes of Hepatic Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Objective:

The present study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio on the long-term outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods:

82 patients who underwent hepatic resection for mass-forming type of ICC were evaluated. The relationship between preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and survival outcomes was investigated.

Results:

The optimal cutoff value of CRP/Alb ratio for assessing overall survival (OS) was determined as 0.089. Univariate analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS) showed that CRP/Alb ratio >0.089, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) >37 U/mL, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, and multiple tumors were significantly associated with postoperative recurrence. On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors identified were CRP/Alb ratio >0.089 (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.006), and multiple tumors (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis for OS showed that CRP/Alb ratio >0.089, CA 19-9 >37 U/mL, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, multiple tumors, and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with overall death. On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors identified were CRP/Alb ratio >0.089 (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01), and multiple tumors (p = 0.005).

Conclusion:

Preoperative CRP/Alb ratio may predict poor long-term outcomes after hepatic resection in patients with ICC.

Clinical significance of preoperative CA19-9 and lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for patients with ICC after a curative resection and clarify the appropriate indications for surgical resection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 81 patients who underwent curative resection for ICC between April 1995 and December 2014. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to analyze the effects of clinicopathological features on overall and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year overall survival of 81 patients was 57.2%, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 24.0%. The multivariate analysis identified the lymph node status and preoperative CA19-9 levels as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. The 5-year overall survival rates were 79.9% and 38.7% in patients with normal and elevated CA19-9, respectively (p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with and without nodal metastasis were 33.7% and 60.9%, respectively (p = 0.0007). After adjusting for prognostic factors identified in a Cox regression analysis, we found that nodal-positive disease was significantly associated with benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.32, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection with curative intent combined with regional lymph node dissection should be indicated for ICC patients with normal CA19-9 levels. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy should be administered to high-risk patients with a positive nodal status.

The efficiency and regimen choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer: A STROBE-compliant retrospective cohort study

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients have poor prognosis even following radical resection. To improve the current status, more evidence is required clarifying the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aim is to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and discuss the regimen choices.We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 80 patients who underwent curative-intent R0 resection from 2008 to 2016. Among them, 40 patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy, and the others in the observation group were 1:1 matched by clinical characteristics including gender, age, tumor stage, and ECOG performance status score. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare DFS and OS. Potential confounding factors were adjusted by Multivariate analysis.In the entire patient cohort, the mean disease-free survival (DFS) time of BTC patients with adjuvant chemotherapy and observation was 18.63 ± 3.63 months versus 10.36 ± 1.67 months, respectively (P = .029). There was no significant difference observed in overall survival (OS) time (33.72 ± 5.02 vs 21.05 ± 4.12 months, P = .114). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy and N factor were found to be significant factors for DFS, and sex, age, T factor were found to be significant factors for OS. Besides, subgroup analysis indicated that combination chemotherapy prolonged DFS time of BTC patients than single-agent to some extent, and oral agents showed efficacy to improve OS.This retrospective study demonstrates that adjuvant chemotherapy contributes to DFS, but is unsatisfactory for improving OS. Combination chemotherapy contained oral agents provides a possibility of therapeutic strategy for improving surgical outcomes of BTC patients.

Diagnosis and Management of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas (CC) are rare tumors which usually present late and are often difficult to diagnose and treat. CCs are categorized as intrahepatic, hilar, or extrahepatic. Epidemiologic studies suggest that the incidence of intrahepatic CCs may be increasing worldwide. In this chapter, we review the risk factors, clinical presentation, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected biliary tract cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of adjuvant treatment (AT) in resected biliary tract cancers (BTC) is still controversial. No efficacy comparison has been performed between chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CTRT). A systematic review of the available evidence regarding adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in resected BTC was performed.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published. Only studies including at least 50 patients affected by tumors of gallbladder, intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal bile ducts were considered. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Thirty studies were analyzed with a total of 22,499 patients, 3967 of whom received AC. Eleven cohorts included Western patients and 19 were Asiatic. Surgeries were classified as R0 with negative margins, R1 with positive microscopic and R2 with positive macroscopic margins. Weighted mean OS difference among experimental (AC) and control arm was 4.3 months (95% CI 0.88-7.79, P = 0.014). AC reduced the risk of death by 41% (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AC administration gives an OS benefit in resected BTC. The results of prospective randomized studies are awaited in order to define the standard AT in BTC.

Adjuvant therapy in biliary tract and gall bladder carcinomas: a review

Biliary tract carcinomas are relatively rare, but are increasingly diagnosed. They comprise several anatomically contiguous sites, so are often grouped together, but they do appear to represent distinct diseases, in part because of anatomical and surgical considerations. Complete upfront surgical resection is generally difficult because these cancers are often diagnosed at relatively advanced stages of disease. Thus, adjuvant therapy is often considered. This paper will review the evidence underpinning current recommendations for adjuvant therapy in biliary carcinomas.

The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy on biliary tract cancer after R0 resection

Background

The optimal treatment strategy for biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative-intent resection remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for BTC patients undergoing microscopically margin-negative (R0) resection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of BTC patients who underwent curative-intent R0 resection. Patients were eligible if they received either fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation after R0 resection.

Results

A total of 153 patients were included. In the entire patient cohort, no significant differences were observed in 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (48.4% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.439) or 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates (49.1% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.299) between patients who received fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. However, for patients with stages II and III BTC, chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year OS rate (52.4% vs. 35.6%, P = 0.002) and 3-year RFS rate (55.5% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.021) compared with observation.

Conclusion

Fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy may prolong the survival of patients with stages II and III BTC after R0 resection.

Is Surgical Resection Justified for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma?

BACKGROUNDS

Prognosis for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with intrahepatic metastasis (IM), vascular invasion (VI), or regional lymph node metastasis (LM) remains poor. The aim of this study was to clarify the indications for surgical resection for advanced ICC.

METHODS

We retrospectively divided 213 ICC patients treated at Kyoto University Hospital between 1993 and 2013 into a resection (n=164) group and a non-resection (n=49) group. Overall survival was assessed after stratification for the presence of IM, VI, or LM.

RESULTS

Overall median survival times (MSTs) for the resection and non-resection groups were 26.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (p<0.001). After stratification, MSTs in the resection and non-resection groups, respectively, were 18.7 vs. 7.0 months for patients with IM (p<0.001), 23.4 vs. 5.7 months for those with VI (p<0.001), and 12.8 vs. 5.5 months for those with LM (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

When macroscopic curative resection is possible, surgical resection can be justified for some advanced ICC patients with IM, VI, or LM.

Is There a Role for Adjuvant Therapy in R0 Resected Gallbladder Cancer?: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the role of adjuvant therapy in stage I-III gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients who have undergone R0 resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data were collected on 441 consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for stage I-III GBC. Eligible patients were classified into adjuvant therapy and surveillance only groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) between the two groups was performed, adjusting clinical factors.

RESULTS

In total, 84 and 279 patients treated with adjuvant therapy and followed up with surveillance only, respectively, were included in the analysis. Before PSM, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was lower in the adjuvant therapy group than in the surveillance only group (50.8% vs. 74.8%, p < 0.001), although there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (66.2% vs. 79.5%, p=0.089). After the PSM, baseline characteristics became comparable and there were no differences in the 5-year RFS (50.8% vs. 64.8%, p=0.319) and OS (66.2% vs. 70.4%, p=0.703) rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy is not indicated in stage I-III GBC patients who have undergone R0 resection.

Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma: Reviewing the Role of Adjuvant Strategies

Cholangiocarcinoma is a very heterogeneous and rare group of neoplasms originating from the perihilar, intra-, or extrahepatic bile duct epithelium. It represents only 3% of gastrointestinal cancers, although their incidence is increasing as its mortality increases. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative option, but unfortunately the resectability rate is low. Overall, these malignancies have got a very poor prognosis with a five-year survival rate of 5-10%. Although the five-year survival rate increases to 25-30% in the cases amenable to surgery, only 10-40% of patients present with resectable disease. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the benefit of adjuvant strategies after surgery to increase the rate of curability. This study reviewed the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable bile duct cancers.

Impact of Chemotherapy and External-Beam Radiation Therapy on Outcomes among Patients with Resected Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-institutional Analysis

BACKGROUND

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) and chemoradiation therapy (cXRT) for the treatment of gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains varied. We sought to define the utilization and effect of adjuvant therapy for patients with GBC.

METHODS

Using a multi-institutional national database, 291 patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000 and 2015 were included. Patients with metastasis or an R2 margin were excluded.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 66.6 years. Most patients had a T2 (46.2 %) or T3 (38.6 %) lesion, and 37.8 % of patients had lymph node (LN) metastasis. A total of 186 (63.9 %) patients underwent surgery alone, 61 (21.0 %) received CTx, and 44 (15.1 %) patients received cXRT. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse overall survival (OS) included T3/T4 stage [hazard ratio (HR) 1.82], LN-metastasis (HR 1.84), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.02), perineural invasion (HR 1.42), and R1 surgical margin status (HR 2.06); all P < 0.05). In contrast, receipt of CTx/cXRT was associated with improved OS (CTx, HR 0.38; cXRT, HR 0.26; P < 0.001) compared with surgery alone. Similar results were observed for disease-free survival (DFS) (CTx, HR 0.61; cXRT, HR 0.43; P < 0.05). Of note, only patients with high-risk features, such as AJCC T3/T4 stage (HR 0.41), LN metastasis (HR 0.45), and R1 disease (HR 0.21) (all P < 0.05) derived an OS benefit from CTx/cXRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant CTx/cXRT was utilized in 36 % of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for GBC. After adjusted analyses, CTx/cXRT were independently associated with improved long-term outcomes, but the benefit was isolated to only patients with high-risk characteristics.

Epidemiology and surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare hepatobiliary malignancy arising from the epithelial cells of the intrahepatic bile ducts. The increased incidence of ICC worldwide may reflect both a true increase and the earlier detection of the disease. Despite the advances in modern surgical care, the curative chance for ICC remained suboptimal: tumor-free margins are hard to achieve due to tumor locations, and technical challenges and recurrence, either local or distant, may hamper the resectability in a large number of patients. Lymph node involvement and vascular invasions are considered negative predictive factors for survival of ICC patients. This review discusses the epidemiology, risk factors and surgical management of ICCs, and mainly focuses on outcomes and factors associated with surgical treatment.

Multidisciplinary Care of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Updates in Management

Cholangiocarcinoma is a highly fatal primary cancer of the bile ducts which arises from malignant transformation of bile duct epithelium. While being an uncommon malignancy with an annual incidence in the United States of 5000 new cases, the incidence has been increasing over the past 30 years and comprises 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Cholangiocarcinoma can be classified into intrahepatic (ICC) and extrahepatic (including hilar and distal bile duct) according to its anatomic location within the biliary tree with respect to the liver. This paper reviews the management of ICC, focusing on the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and surgical and nonsurgical management.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas are rare cancers arising from the epithelia of the biliary tract. The only prospect of curative therapy is with surgery. However, relapse rates are high with five-year survival rates typically around 20-30%. Involved resection margins and spread to local lymph nodes are associated with a higher risk of relapse. Such poor outcomes provide a rationale for adjuvant strategies to improve survival. However, there is little randomised data to support the use of adjuvant therapy; the available evidence base is based mostly on retrospective case series and results are often conflicting. This review evaluates the available evidence. Adjuvant therapy may be considered on an individual patient basis after discussion of the limitations of our knowledge. The results of prospective, randomised clinical trials of adjuvant therapy are eagerly awaited. Progress will require collaboration of basic science and clinical oncology and the execution of well-designed clinical trials.

Survival outcomes and progonostic factors of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients following surgical resection: Adjuvant therapy is a favorable prognostic factor

This study was conducted to investigate survival and prognostic factors for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) following surgical resection and evaluate the effects of postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT) on overall survival (OS). We retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data between March, 2008 and December, 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method and the COX regression model were used to evaluate the OS and prognostic factors of 105 postoperative ECC patients, of whom 32 had received AT. The patients were stratified into seven risk subgroups and the survival rates were compared within each subgroup between patients who received AT and those who did not. The results demonstrated a median OS of 17.6 months, with 1- and 3-year survival rates of 67.9 and 19.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, preoperative cholangitis, non-R0 surgical margins, poor differentiation grade, stage 3/4 and lymphatic metastasis were identified as adverse prognostic factors. AT was not significantly associated with improved OS. However, the subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of AT was significant only in the lymphatic metastasis group (median OS, 21.6 vs. 10.4 months; and 3-year OS, 16.6 vs. 0%, respectively; P=0.02). The survival curves of the AT and non-AT groups were significantly different only for node-positive patients. The COX regression model identified lymphatic metastasis, surgical margins and AT as independent prognostic factors for ECC. A negative resection margin may reduce the mortality rate following surgery by 47%. By contrast, lymph node metastasis was associated with a 2.18-fold higher mortality rate for ECC patients. Postoperative AT contributed to a 0.45-fold mortality rate compared to non-AT ECC patients. Therefore, we concluded that AT is a favorable prognostic factor for ECC patients and it may prolong the survival of patients with lymphatic metastasis. Our data suggest that postoperative AT should be recommended for node-positive ECC patients.