1
|
Khan AMH, Anwer SH, Sayed S, Mansha MA, Kamran YB, Khursheed A, Haroon F, Soomro NH, Idrees R, Abbasi AN. Comprehensive clinical overview of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Respir Med 2024; 222:107511. [PMID: 38163522 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shaikh Hasan Anwer
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Samad Sayed
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Atif Mansha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Yazdan Bin Kamran
- Department of Medicine, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Afrah Khursheed
- Department of Radiology, King Khalid Hospital,Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahd Haroon
- Diagnostic Radiology, Karachi X-Rays, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Niaz Hussain Soomro
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Romana Idrees
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ahmed Nadeem Abbasi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deiana C, Fabbri F, Tavolari S, Palloni A, Brandi G. Improvements in Systemic Therapies for Advanced Malignant Mesothelioma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10415. [PMID: 37445594 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy associated with poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of 12%. Many drugs have been tested over the years with conflicting results. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current therapies in MPM and how to best interpret the data available on these drugs. Furthermore, we focused on promising treatments under investigation, such as immunotherapy with targets different from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, vaccines, target therapies, and metabolism-based strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Deiana
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Fabbri
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Tavolari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Palloni
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peralta-Amaro AL, Vázquez-Hernández A, Morales-Osorio G, Pecero-García E, Triana-González S, Manzo-Carballo F, Acosta-Jiménez E. A survivor woman after three years of a cardiac tamponade. J Cardiol Cases 2022; 25:259-261. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
4
|
Ke H, Kao S, Lee K, Takahashi K, Goh HP, Linton A. The minimum standard of care for managing malignant pleural mesothelioma in developing nations within the Asia-Pacific Region. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:177-190. [PMID: 34161674 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable malignancy associated with high symptom burden and poor prognosis. The relationship between asbestos exposure and MPM incidence is well-established. The incidence rate of MPM in Australia and New Zealand is among the highest globally. Matching the experience of other nations with legal restrictions on asbestos, incidence is expected to fall. In contrast, the incidence of MPM is rising in the developing nations of the Asia-Pacific as consumption and mining (albeit to a lesser extent) of asbestos continues. The incidence of MPM in these nations is currently low or unknown, reflecting insufficient latency periods since industrial use of asbestos, deficient resources for accurate diagnosis, and lack of occupational disease or cancer registries. The landscape of treatment for MPM is rapidly changing with combination immunotherapy now demonstrating improved survival in the first-line setting. Considering vast global inequity in access to anticancer treatments, establishing minimum standard of care for MPM in developing nations is of greater significance. Here, we review the evidence that form the basis of our minimum-standard recommendations for diagnosis, systemic treatment, management of recurrent pleural effusions, and symptom management. We also briefly review evidence-based treatment that may be considered for those with access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Ke
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Lee
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
| | - Hui Poh Goh
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei
| | - Anthony Linton
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gray SG. Emerging avenues in immunotherapy for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. BMC Pulm Med 2021; 21:148. [PMID: 33952230 PMCID: PMC8097826 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01513-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of immunotherapy in cancer is now well-established, and therapeutic options such as checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being approved in many cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare orphan disease associated with prior exposure to asbestos, with a dismal prognosis. Evidence from clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitors in this rare disease, suggest that such therapies may play a role as a treatment option for a proportion of patients with this cancer. MAIN TEXT While the majority of studies currently focus on the established checkpoint inhibitors (CTLA4 and PD1/PDL1), there are many other potential checkpoints that could also be targeted. In this review I provide a synopsis of current clinical trials of immunotherapies in MPM, explore potential candidate new avenues that may become future targets for immunotherapy and discuss aspects of immunotherapy that may affect the clinical outcomes of such therapies in this cancer. CONCLUSIONS The current situation regarding checkpoint inhibitors in the management of MPM whilst encouraging, despite impressive durable responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors do not provide a long-term benefit to the majority of patients with cancer. Additional studies are therefore required to further delineate and improve our understanding of both checkpoint inhibitors and the immune system in MPM. Moreover, many new potential checkpoints have yet to be studied for their therapeutic potential in MPM. All these plus the existing checkpoint inhibitors will require the development of new biomarkers for patient stratification, response and also for predicting or monitoring the emergence of resistance to these agents in MPM patients. Other potential therapeutic avenues such CAR-T therapy or treatments like oncolytic viruses or agents that target the interferon pathway designed to recruit more immune cells to the tumor also hold great promise in this hard to treat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven G Gray
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Central Pathology Laboratory, CPL 30, TCDSJ Cancer Institute, St James's Hospital, Dublin, D08 RX0X, Ireland.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- School of Biology, Technical University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karunakaran KB, Yanamala N, Boyce G, Becich MJ, Ganapathiraju MK. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Interactome with 364 Novel Protein-Protein Interactions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1660. [PMID: 33916178 PMCID: PMC8037232 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer affecting the outer lining of the lung, with a median survival of less than one year. We constructed an 'MPM interactome' with over 300 computationally predicted protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and over 2400 known PPIs of 62 literature-curated genes whose activity affects MPM. Known PPIs of the 62 MPM associated genes were derived from Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID) and Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD). Novel PPIs were predicted by applying the HiPPIP algorithm, which computes features of protein pairs such as cellular localization, molecular function, biological process membership, genomic location of the gene, and gene expression in microarray experiments, and classifies the pairwise features as interacting or non-interacting based on a random forest model. We validated five novel predicted PPIs experimentally. The interactome is significantly enriched with genes differentially ex-pressed in MPM tumors compared with normal pleura and with other thoracic tumors, genes whose high expression has been correlated with unfavorable prognosis in lung cancer, genes differentially expressed on crocidolite exposure, and exosome-derived proteins identified from malignant mesothelioma cell lines. 28 of the interactors of MPM proteins are targets of 147 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. By comparing disease-associated versus drug-induced differential expression profiles, we identified five potentially repurposable drugs, namely cabazitaxel, primaquine, pyrimethamine, trimethoprim and gliclazide. Preclinical studies may be con-ducted in vitro to validate these computational results. Interactome analysis of disease-associated genes is a powerful approach with high translational impact. It shows how MPM-associated genes identified by various high throughput studies are functionally linked, leading to clinically translatable results such as repurposed drugs. The PPIs are made available on a webserver with interactive user interface, visualization and advanced search capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyani B. Karunakaran
- Supercomputer Education and Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India;
| | - Naveena Yanamala
- Exposure Assessment Branch, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Center for Disease Control, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; (N.Y.); (G.B.)
| | - Gregory Boyce
- Exposure Assessment Branch, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Center for Disease Control, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; (N.Y.); (G.B.)
| | - Michael J. Becich
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA;
| | - Madhavi K. Ganapathiraju
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA;
- Intelligent Systems Program, School of Computing and Information, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Switch-maintenance gemcitabine after first-line chemotherapy in patients with malignant mesothelioma (NVALT19): an investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. THE LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2021; 9:585-592. [PMID: 33515500 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30362-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almost all patients with malignant mesothelioma eventually have disease progression after first-line therapy. Previous studies have investigated maintenance therapy, but none has shown a great effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of switch-maintenance gemcitabine in patients with malignant mesothelioma without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy. METHODS We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial in 18 hospitals in the Netherlands (NVALT19). We recruited patients aged older than 18 years with unresectable malignant mesothelioma with no evidence of disease progression after at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy (with platinum and pemetrexed), who had a WHO performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and measurable or evaluable disease. Exclusion criteria were active uncontrolled infection or severe cardiac dysfunction, serious disabling conditions, symptomatic CNS metastases, radiotherapy within 2 weeks before enrolment, and concomitant use of any other drugs under investigation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using the minimisation method, to maintenance intravenous gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, in cycles of 21 days) plus supportive care, or to best supportive care alone, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, serious intercurrent illness, patient request for discontinuation, or need for any other anticancer agent, except for palliative radiotherapy. A CT scan of the thorax or abdomen (or both) and pulmonary function tests were done at baseline and repeated every 6 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all participants who received one or more doses of the study drug or had at least one visit for supportive care. Recruitment is now closed; treatment and follow-up are ongoing. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR4132/NL3847. FINDINGS Between March 20, 2014, and Feb 27, 2019, 130 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus supportive care (65 patients [50%]) or supportive care alone (65 patients [50%]). No patients were lost to follow-up; median follow-up was 36·5 months (95% CI 34·2 to not reached), and one patient in the supportive care group withdrew consent. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the gemcitabine group (median 6·2 months [95% CI 4·6-8·7]) than in the supportive care group (3·2 months [2·8-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·33-0·71]; p=0·0002). The benefit was confirmed by masked independent central review (HR 0·49 [0·33-0·72]; p=0·0002). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 33 (52%) of 64 patients in the gemcitabine group and in ten (16%) of 62 patients in the supportive care group. The most frequent adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia, fatigue or asthenia, pain, and infection in the gemcitabine group, and pain, infection, and cough or dyspnoea in the supportive care group. One patient (2%) in the gemcitabine group died, due to a treatment-related infection. INTERPRETATION Switch-maintenance gemcitabine, after first-line chemotherapy, significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone, among patients with malignant mesothelioma. This study confirms the activity of gemcitabine in treating malignant mesothelioma. FUNDING Dutch Cancer Society (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding) and Stichting NVALT studies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Koda Y, Kuribayashi K, Doi H, Kitajima K, Nakajima Y, Ishigaki H, Nakamura A, Minami T, Takahashi R, Yokoi T, Kijima T. Irinotecan and Gemcitabine as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma following Platinum plus Pemetrexed Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study. Oncology 2020; 99:161-168. [PMID: 33053560 DOI: 10.1159/000510691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cisplatin-pemetrexed combination chemotherapy is the current standard primary treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). It was first approved for untreated and unresectable MPM in the 2003 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, to date, standard treatments for patients with MPM who previously underwent chemotherapy, as recommended by the NCCN Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma guidelines, have been inadequate. To explore treatment options for such patients, we performed this retrospective study of patients who received irinotecan plus gemcitabine as second-line therapy for MPM. METHODS We investigated 62 patients diagnosed with unresectable MPM between January 2008 and October 2017 who experienced recurrence following cisplatin treatment (or carboplatin) plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed monotherapy as first-line treatment, and who underwent irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy as second-line treatment. Irinotecan (60 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, including a 1-week washout period. Our endpoints were efficacy, survival period, and toxicity. RESULTS patients' median age was 65 years (range 50-79), and the histological MPM types were epithelioid (n = 48), sarcomatoid (n = 6), biphasic (n = 6), and desmoplastic (n = 2). One patient experienced a partial response, 40 had stable disease, and 21 had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 66.1% and the response rate 2.1%. Additionally, the median progression-free and overall survival time were 5.7 and 11.3 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (32.2%), loss of appetite (16.1%), nausea/diarrhea (11.3%), and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (9.7%). Grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (12.9%) and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (2.1%); however, all adverse events were managed with symptomatic therapy. CONCLUSIONS Despite the fact that second-line irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy did not produce marked tumor shrinkage, it achieved a relatively high disease control rate of >65% with an acceptable toxicity profile. Hence, the combination of irinotecan plus gemcitabine may be considered for MPM treatment, with consideration of combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a potential next step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichi Koda
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Kozo Kuribayashi
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan, .,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan,
| | - Hiroshi Doi
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Kitajima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakajima
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Ishigaki
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Akifumi Nakamura
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Minami
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Ryo Takahashi
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Takashi Yokoi
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Takashi Kijima
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cinausero M, Rihawi K, Cortiula F, Follador A, Fasola G, Ardizzoni A. Emerging therapies in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 144:102815. [PMID: 31670225 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.102815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer of the pleural surfaces frequently related to asbestos exposure. It is characterized by a poor prognosis even for patients treated with trimodality therapy, including surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Moreover, the majority of patients are not candidates for surgery due to disease advanced stage or medical comorbidities. For these patients, the survival rate is even lower and few therapeutic options are currently available. Nevertheless, many interesting novel approaches are under investigation, among which immunotherapy represents one of the most promising emerging strategies. In this review, we will discuss the role of new therapeutic options, particularly immunotherapy, and present the results of the most important and promising clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika Cinausero
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Italy; School of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Italy.
| | - Karim Rihawi
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Cortiula
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Italy; School of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Ardizzoni
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
BAP1 Status Determines the Sensitivity of Malignant Mesothelioma Cells to Gemcitabine Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20020429. [PMID: 30669483 PMCID: PMC6359027 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20020429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma (MMe) is a cancer with poor prognosis and resistance to standard treatments. Recent reports have highlighted the role of the BRCA1 associated protein 1 gene (BAP1) in the development of MMe. In this study, the chemosensitivity of human mesothelioma cell lines carrying BAP1 wild-type (WT), mutant and silenced was analysed. The BAP1 mutant cells were significantly less sensitive than BAP1 WT cell lines to the clinically relevant drug gemcitabine. Silencing of BAP1 significantly increased resistance of MMe cells to gemcitabine. Cell cycle analysis suggested that gemcitabine induced Sub-G1 phase accumulation of the BAP1 WT cells and increased in the S-phase in both BAP1 WT and mutant cells. Analysis of the role of BAP1 in apoptosis suggested that gemcitabine induced early apoptosis in both BAP1 WT and BAP1 mutant cells but with a much higher degree in the WT cells. Effects on the population of cells in late apoptosis, which can mark necrosis and necroptosis, could not be seen in the mutant cells, highlighting the possibility that BAP1 plays a role in several types of cell death. Significantly decreased DNA damage in the form of double-strand breaks was observed in gemcitabine-treated BAP1 mutant cells, compared to BAP1 WT cells under the same conditions. After BAP1 silencing, a significant decrease in DNA damage in the form of double-strand breaks was observed compared to cells transfected with scramble siRNA. Taken together, the results presented in this manuscript shed light on the role of BAP1 in the response of MMe cells to gemcitabine treatment and in particular in the control of the DNA damage response, therefore providing a potential route for more efficient MMe therapy.
Collapse
|
11
|
A systematic review and meta-analysis of second-line therapies for treatment of mesothelioma. Respir Med 2018; 141:72-80. [PMID: 30053976 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is generally treated with platinum/pemetrexed-based first-line therapy. Once the disease progresses, evidence for the efficacy of palliative treatments is lacking, and platinum re-challenge or single-agent chemotherapy are commonly used. To assess the effects of cytostatic or targeted therapy for treating MPM, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched to identify published articles on second-line treatments for recurrent or advanced mesothelioma. Inclusion criteria were publication in the English language, describing clinical trials with 20 or more patients, and evaluability for efficacy and for receiving second-line systemic therapies. Data were pooled using number of events/number of evaluable patients, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), according to a fixed or random effect model. Pooled median OS was the primary endpoint. RESULTS A total of 49 eligible studies (n = 3938 patients; range, 12-400) were identified. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months (95%CI 2.87-3.93). Median pooled OS was 7.86 (95%CI 7.01-8.72). The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 8.63% (95%CI 6-11.26), and the pooled disease control rate (DCR) was 54.8% (95%CI 48.9-60.6). Median pooled OS with platinum- and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy were 7.93 and 7.78 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There remains uncertainty about the ideal second-line agent for MPM. Based on this meta-analysis, palliative chemotherapy or other experimental agents can be considered for patients with MPM who desire further treatment after their disease has progressed, during or after first-line therapy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Petrini I, Lucchesi M, Puppo G, Chella A. Medical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma relapses. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S333-S341. [PMID: 29507803 PMCID: PMC5830550 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
There are not established treatments for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma that progressed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed. Retrospective analyses suggest a possible role for rechallenge with pemetrexed for selected patients. Phase II trials demonstrate a modest efficacy of vinorelbine monotherapy with a response rate ranging between 0% and 18% and a tolerable toxicity profile. Combination schedules, despite an increased toxicity, fail to demonstrate an improved efficacy. To date, genome wide analyses did not show molecular targets suitable for therapy and biological drugs did not exert a significant efficacy in clinical trials. Immunotherapy has given a hint of efficacy in early clinical trials but definitive evaluations are still ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iacopo Petrini
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- General Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Lucchesi
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Puppo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Chella
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cinausero M, Rihawi K, Sperandi F, Melotti B, Ardizzoni A. Chemotherapy treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a difficult history. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S304-S310. [PMID: 29507800 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm that typically arises from mesothelial surfaces of the pleural cavity. Despite treatment improvements, it carries a dismal prognosis. The majority of patients either have unresectable disease or are not candidates for surgery due to medical comorbidities or old age. For such patients, chemotherapy (CT) represents the gold-standard treatment. To date, combination CT with cisplatin plus pemetrexed represents the most widely used regimen in first-line setting for patients with unresectable MPM. Other first-line options are currently available, including the use of raltitrexed instead of pemetrexed combined with platinum. In this review, we discuss the role of CT in MPM mainly focusing on the results of the trials conducted in first-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika Cinausero
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.,Department of Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Karim Rihawi
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Sperandi
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Melotti
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Ardizzoni
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hillerdal CO, Ötvös R, Szatmári T, Own SA, Hillerdal G, Dackland ÅL, Dobra K, Hjerpe A. Ex vivo evaluation of tumor cell specific drug responses in malignant pleural effusions. Oncotarget 2017; 8:82885-82896. [PMID: 29137310 PMCID: PMC5669936 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of chemotherapy may be improved by combining the most effective drugs based on testing the sensitivity of the individual tumor ex vivo. Such estimations of tumor cells from effusions have so far not been implemented in the clinical routine as a basis for individualized choice of therapy. One obstacle for such analyses is the admixture of benign cells that might obscure the results. In this paper we test and compare two ways of performing the analysis specifically on tumor cells. First we enrich the tumor cells, using antibody labeled magnetic separation, and measure the effects of subsequent drug exposure with the metabolic activity assays WST-1 and alamar blue. The second way of estimating drug effects specifically on tumor cells employs multi parameter flow cytometry, measuring apoptosis with the propidium iodide / AnnexinV technique and, particularly for pemetrexed, possible effects on cell cycle progression in immunologically identified tumor cells. The two techniques produce similar results, indicating a possible use in personalized medicine. The possible predictive role of the analysis remains to be shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl-Olof Hillerdal
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rita Ötvös
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tünde Szatmári
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sulaf Abd Own
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Hillerdal
- Gävle Hospital, Department of Lung Medicine, 803 24 Gävle, Sweden
| | - Åsa-Lena Dackland
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katalin Dobra
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Hjerpe
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ban CJ, Shi HZ, Zhang YH. Improvement of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Prognosis: Early Diagnosis and Multimodality Treatment. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017; 130:1-3. [PMID: 28051015 PMCID: PMC5221096 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.196585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Jun Ban
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020; Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Huan-Zhong Shi
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020; Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Yu-Hui Zhang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020; Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing 100020, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vinca alkaloids in the therapeutic management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41:853-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2015] [Revised: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
17
|
Raynaud C, Greillier L, Mazieres J, Monnet I, Mastroianni B, Robinet G, Fraboulet G, Dixmier A, Berard H, Lamy R, Letreut J, Lena H, Oliviero G, Botta S, Vergnenegre A, Borget I, Chouaid C. Management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a French multicenter retrospective study (GFPC 0802 study). BMC Cancer 2015; 15:857. [PMID: 26546402 PMCID: PMC4635998 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1881-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with poor prognosis in spite of significant improvement in survival, due to new chemotherapy regimens. We describe here patients' profiles and management in daily practice in France. METHODS Observational retrospective study. Data were collected from medical files. All patients with histologically proven MPM diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2008 were included in the participating sites. RESULTS Four hundred and six patients were included in 37 sites: mean age 68.9 ± 9.8 years, male predominance (sex ratio 3.27), latency of the disease 45.7 years, epithelioïd type 83 %. Diagnosis was made using thoracoscopy in 80.8 % of patients. Radical surgery was performed in 6.2 % of cases. Chemotherapy was administered to 74.6 % of patients. First line regimens consisted mainly of platinum + pemetrexed (91 %) or pemetrexed alone (7 %). Objective response rate was 17.2 % and another 41.6 % of patients experienced disease stabilization. Half of these patients underwent second line chemotherapy (platinium + pemetrexed 31.6 %, pemetrexed alone 24.6 %), resulting in a 6 % response rate. Third-line chemotherapy (56 patients) yielded disease control in 5.4 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS The management of MPM in France is usually in accordance with guidelines. Response rates are somewhat lower than those described in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Raynaud
- Service de Pneumologie, CH Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France.
| | - L Greillier
- Service d'oncologie thoracique, APHM, Marseille, Services de Pneumologie, Marseille, France.
| | | | - I Monnet
- Service de pneumologie, CHI Créteil, 40 avenue de verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - R Lamy
- CH Lorient, Lorient, France.
| | - J Letreut
- CH Aix en Provence, Aix en Provence, France.
| | - H Lena
- CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
| | | | | | | | | | - C Chouaid
- Service de pneumologie, CHI Créteil, 40 avenue de verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abdel-Rahman O, kelany M. Systemic therapy options for malignant pleural mesothelioma beyond first-line therapy: a systematic review. Expert Rev Respir Med 2015; 9:533-49. [DOI: 10.1586/17476348.2015.1083426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
19
|
de Lima VAB, Sørensen JB. Third-line chemotherapy with carboplatin, gemcitabine and liposomised doxorubicin for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Med Oncol 2015; 32:458. [PMID: 25572813 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0458-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
20
|
Ai J, Stevenson JP. Current issues in malignant pleural mesothelioma evaluation and management. Oncologist 2014; 19:975-84. [PMID: 25061089 PMCID: PMC4153452 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon disease most often associated with occupational asbestos exposure and is steadily increasing in worldwide incidence. Patients typically present at an older age, with advanced clinical stage and other medical comorbidities, making management quite challenging. Despite great efforts, the prognosis of MPM remains poor, especially at progression after initial treatment. Macroscopic complete resection of MPM can be achieved through extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or extended (ie, radical) pleurectomy (e-P/D) in selected patients and can result in prolonged survival when incorporated into a multimodality approach. Given the morbidity associated with surgical resection of MPM, optimizing identification of appropriate patients is essential. Unfortunately, most patients are not candidates for EPP or e-P/D due to advanced stage, age, and/or medical comorbidity. Pemetrexed and platinum combination chemotherapy has become the cornerstone of therapy for patients with unresectable disease because the combination is associated with improved survival and quality of life in treated patients. However, MPM eventually becomes resistant to initial therapy, and benefit to further lines of therapy has not been substantiated in randomized clinical trials. Translational research has provided exciting insights into tumorigenesis, biomarkers, and immune response in MPM, leading to the development of multiple novel therapeutic agents that are currently in clinical trials. These advances hold the promise of a new era in the treatment of MPM and suggest that this disease will not be left behind in the war on cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Ai
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James P Stevenson
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mutlu H, Gündüz S, Karaca H, Büyükçelik A, Cihan YB, Erden A, Akca Z, Coşkun HS. Second-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens improve overall 3-year survival rate in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a multicenter retrospective study. Med Oncol 2014; 31:74. [PMID: 24958517 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0074-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2014] [Accepted: 06/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of second-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens on overall survival (OS) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients receiving first-line pemetrexed-based regimens. A total of 73 patients with MPM from Akdeniz University, Acibadem Kayseri Hospital, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, and Erciyes University were analyzed and evaluated retrospectively as two groups: second-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and no second-line chemotherapy. The median OS of patients who received second-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 11.3 (5.1-17.5) months, while it was 9.9 (2.1-17.7) months in the patients who did not receive chemotherapy in the second-line setting (p = 0.056). When we evaluated the survival rate at the 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, and 36th month, the OS rate of the 36th month was significantly higher in patients who received gemcitabine-based second-line chemotherapy (p = 0.041). When evaluating the OS from diagnosis to death, the median OS values were 20.8 (17.5-24.1) months for first-line pemetrexed-based regimens then second-line gemcitabine alone and 13.1 (9.0-17.1) months supportive care after first-line pemetrexed-based regimens (p = 0.005). According to our results, we may consider gemcitabine-based regimens as second-line chemotherapy after treatment with pemetrexed plus platinum in patients with MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Mutlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem Kayseri Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|