Establishment and validation of a novel survival prediction scoring algorithm for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer spinal metastasis

Assessing the diagnostic value of oncological biomarkers for identifying primary malignancies in skeletal metastatic disease

INTRODUCTION

Distinguishing primary malignancies from metastases is the primary objective of diagnosing bone tumors of unknown etiology. For metastatic bone disease, recognizing the primary disease is pivotal to plan appropriate treatment. Despite uncertainties, oncological biomarkers are commonly utilized for early diagnostics.

METHODS

Laboratory biomarkers were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records of 193 individuals after oncologic examinations for unknown skeletal lesions during a 3-year period. Blood cell count, creatinine, PSA, Ca19-9, Ca15-3, Ca12-5, CEA, S-Prot, myeloma light chains and their ratio were assessed and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

An elevation in biomarker values was observed across all cancer types, indicating lack of specificity. Patients with increased CEA mostly had breast (29 %, NS) or lung (24 %, p=<0.001) cancer, those with elevated Ca15-3 breast cancer (63 %, p=<0.001) or lung cancer (16 %, p = 0.042). Only 13 % of patients with increased Ca12-5 exhibited gynecological carcinomas (p = 0.025), and 36 % of those with increased Ca19-9 levels had gastrointestinal cancer (p = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, Ca12-5 alone reached significance in lung cancer (p = 0.008). PSA was elevated in patients with prostate cancer (p = 0.015), but only 74 % of those with increased PSA had prostate cancer. The markers S-Prot (p=<0.001) and light chain ratio (p = 0.004) signified myeloma. However, increased values were found among all disease groups, including those with benign lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Carcinoma biomarkers (CEA, Ca12-5, Ca19-9, and Ca15-3) lack specificity, and are not helpful in association with skeletal metastases. PSA and myeloma variables may be useful in selected cases but should be restricted to cases where prostate cancer or multiple myeloma is suspected.

The utilization of hypoalbuminemia as a prognostic metric in patients with spinal metastases: A scoping review

Introduction

Hypoalbuminemia is associated with poor outcomes in cancer patients, but its role in spinal metastases remains unclear.

Research question

This study aimed to identify albumin cutoff values defining hypoalbuminemia and describe the association between serum albumin and outcomes in patients with spinal metastases.

Material and methods

A narrative review of articles up to December 2022 was conducted using PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Variables extracted included study design, patient characteristics, serum albumin levels, treatments, and levels of evidence. Outcomes included survival/mortality, complications, ambulatory status, readmission, length of stay, discharge disposition, and blood loss.

Results

Thirty-eight studies comprising 21,401 patients were analyzed. Most studies (92%) were Level of Evidence III. Albumin was evaluated as a continuous variable in 18% of studies and as a dichotomous variable in 76%, with 3.5 g/dL being the most common threshold for hypoalbuminemia. Primary outcomes evaluated were survival/mortality (71% of studies), complications (34%), and reoperation/readmission (11%). Of studies examining the association between hypoalbuminemia and survival/mortality, 74% found a significant association. An association between albumin levels and complications was found in 54% of relevant studies.

Discussion and conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that a threshold of 3.5 g/dL seems most appropriate to define hypoalbuminemia in patients with spinal metastases. However, evidence also supports a level-dependent effect. The most consistent significant association was between low albumin and survival at both fixed and continuous time points. There is less evidence to support an association between hypoalbuminemia and other endpoints such as perioperative complications.

Malnutrition in Spine Oncology: Where Are We and What Are We Measuring?

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify which markers are used as surrogates for malnutrition in metastatic spine disease and which are the most studied outcomes associated with it.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed by searching the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to July 2022. We searched for articles exploring markers of malnutrition in spine oncology patients including but not limited to albumin, body weight, weight loss, and nutrition indices. A narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 61 articles reporting on 31,385 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 13 different surrogate markers of nutrition, with the most common being albumin in 67% of studies (n = 41), body weight/BMI in 34% (n = 21), and muscle mass in 28% (n = 17). The most common studied outcomes were survival in 82% (n = 50), complications in 28% (n = 17), and length of stay in 10% (n = 6) of studies. Quality of life and functional outcomes were assessed in 2% (n = 1) and 3% (n = 2) of studies, respectively. Out of 61 studies, 18% (n = 11) found no association between the examined markers and outcome.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of nutritional status in patients with spinal metastases is fundamental. However, there is lack of a comprehensive and consistent way of assessing malnutrition in oncologic spine patients and therefore inconsistency in its relationship with outcomes. A consensus agreement on the assessment and definition of malnutrition in spine tumor patients is needed.

The Impact of Adjunct Medical Therapy on Survival after Spine Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Pooled Data Analysis

Targeted therapy has greatly improved the outlook for patients with spinal metastatic cancers. Scoring systems like the Tokuhashi or Tomita scores are commonly used to predict prognosis and inform surgical decisions, but they are outdated and fail to consider recent advancements. We aimed to investigate the current state of the literature and treatment options pertaining to advancements in targeted therapy compared to other forms of medical management for metastatic spinal tumors. This study represents the first comprehensive systematic review that encompasses the most common primary cancers that metastasize to the spine and evaluates the median overall survival (mOS) across five different medical treatment modalities as well as surgical intervention. Additionally, our study analyzes the tumor receptor status in conjunction with these treatments. A PubMed search was conducted, and according to the PRISMA guidelines, 28 articles out of 1834 met the inclusion criteria. The pooled data analysis highlighted the superior efficacy of targeted therapy, evidenced by a significant improvement in the mOS and lower hazard ratios in patients with lung and breast cancers who received targeted therapy compared to those who did not. Our study provides valuable insights into the recent advancements in the medical management of metastatic spinal tumors. Future indications include incorporating this literature into personalized treatment approaches for metastatic spinal tumors.

Prognostic value of blood-based protein biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer: A critical review and 2008-2022 update

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic possibilities for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have considerably increased during recent decades.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the prognostic relevance of serum tumor markers (STM) for early and late-stage NSCLC patients treated with classical chemotherapies, novel targeted and immune therapies.

METHODS

A PubMed database search was conducted for prognostic studies on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase, squamous-cell carcinoma antigen, progastrin-releasing-peptide, CA125, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 STMs in NSCLC patients published from 2008 until June 2022.

RESULTS

Out of 1069 studies, 141 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A considerable heterogeneity regarding design, patient number, analytical and statistical methods was observed. High pretherapeutic CYFRA 21-1 levels and insufficient decreases indicated unfavorable prognosis in many studies on NSCLC patients treated with chemo-, targeted and immunotherapies or their combinations in early and advanced stages. Similar results were seen for CEA in chemotherapy, however, high pretherapeutic levels were sometimes favorable in targeted therapies. CA125 is a promising prognostic marker in patients treated with immunotherapies. Combinations of STMs further increased the prognostic value over single markers.

CONCLUSION

Protein STMs, especially CYFRA 21-1, have prognostic potential in early and advanced stage NSCLC. For future STM investigations, better adherence to comparable study designs, analytical methods, outcome measures and statistical evaluation standards is recommended.

The role of surgery in the treatment of metastatic bone tumor

Surgery for bone metastasis has two primary goals-palliative care to relieve pain, instability and paralysis, and tumor resection for curing the disease. Oncologically en bloc resection, followed by a reconstruction of the bone defect is the treatment of choice in single bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma or thyroid cancer. Bone metastases may occur in the extremities, pelvis, or spine, and different resection and reconstruction methods depend on the regional anatomy. For instance, multiple options are available for reconstruction of the pelvis, especially for the acetabulum, including anatomical reconstruction using custom-made implants or recycled autologous bone grafting when a long-term prognosis is expected. Recently, for the spine, total en bloc spondylectomy is extensively performed despite the initial limitations of surgical invasiveness, such as blood loss. Principally, palliative surgery aims to maintain lasting bony stability with minimal surgical invasiveness. Intramedullary nails and plate fixation are frequently used in the extremities but the postoperative failure rate is relatively high. Therefore, surgeons should consider the use of long intramedullary nails and long-type stems for endoprosthesis reconstruction along with cement fixation to reduce the failure rate. Although short-term complications, such as dislocation, have been observed with endoprosthesis reconstruction, it is stable in the long-term follow-up. Percutaneous bone cement injection into the spine and pelvis is also effective and less invasive.

Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Bone Metastasis and Their Therapeutic Value

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Bone metastasis, which usually accompanies severe skeletal-related events, is the most common site for tumor distant dissemination and detected in more than one-third of patients with advanced lung cancer. Biopsy and imaging play critical roles in the diagnosis of bone metastasis; however, these approaches are characterized by evident limitations. Recently, studies regarding potential biomarkers in the serum, urine, and tumor tissue, were performed to predict the bone metastases and prognosis in patients with lung cancer. In this review, we summarize the findings of recent clinical research studies on biomarkers detected in samples obtained from patients with lung cancer bone metastasis. These markers include the following: (1) bone resorption-associated markers, such as N-terminal telopeptide (NTx)/C-terminal telopeptide (CTx), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx-I), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP-5b), pyridinoline (PYD), and parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP); (2) bone formation-associated markers, including total serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP)/bone specific alkaline phosphatase(BAP), osteopontin (OP), osteocalcin (OS), amino-terminal extension propeptide of type I procollagen/carboxy-terminal extension propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP/PINP); (3) signaling markers, including epidermal growth factor receptor/Kirsten rat sarcoma/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EGFR/KRAS/ALK), receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand/receptor activator of nuclear factor κB/osteoprotegerin (RANKL/RANK/OPG), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12/C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCL12/CXCR4), complement component 5a receptor (C5AR); and (4) other potential markers, such as calcium sensing receptor (CASR), bone sialoprotein (BSP), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), cytokeratin 19 fragment/carcinoembryonic antigen (CYFRA/CEA), tissue factor, cell-free DNA, long non-coding RNA, and microRNA. The prognostic value of these markers is also investigated. Furthermore, we listed some clinical trials targeting hotspot biomarkers in advanced lung cancer referring for their therapeutic effects.