Risk factors and prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in advanced rectal cancer

Predictive Study of Machine Learning-Based Multiparametric MRI Radiomics Nomogram for Perineural Invasion in Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study

This study aimed to establish and validate the efficacy of a nomogram model, synthesized through the integration of multi-parametric magnetic resonance radiomics and clinical risk factors, for forecasting perineural invasion in rectal cancer. We retrospectively collected data from 108 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative multiparametric MRI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between April 2019 and August 2023. This dataset was subsequently divided into training and validation sets following a ratio of 7:3. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were implemented to identify independent clinical risk factors associated with perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer. We manually delineated the region of interest (ROI) layer-by-layer on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences and extracted the image features. Five machine learning algorithms were used to construct radiomics model with the features selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. The optimal radiomics model was then selected and combined with clinical features to formulate a nomogram model. The model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and its clinical value was assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA). Our final selection comprised 10 optimal radiological features and the SVM model showcased superior predictive efficiency and robustness among the five classifiers. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the nomogram model were 0.945 (0.899, 0.991) and 0.846 (0.703, 0.99) for the training and validation sets, respectively. The nomogram model developed in this study exhibited excellent predictive performance in foretelling PNI of rectal cancer, thereby offering valuable guidance for clinical decision-making. The nomogram could predict the perineural invasion status of rectal cancer in early stage.

Who is a candidate at the initial presentation? Prediction of positive lateral lymph node and survival after dissection

Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) in rectal cancer has a significant clinical impact on the prognosis and treatment strategies. But there are still debates regarding prediction of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and its oncological impact. This review explores the evidence for predicting lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer. Until now many studies have reported that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are considered as essential tools for predicting metastatic LPN, with MRI-based size criteria, particularly the short-axis diameter of LPN. But several studies have reported that the addition of tumor location or artificial intelligence (AI) can further enhance diagnostic accuracy. Western practices focus more on neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), while Eastern countries focus more on lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND). LPND has been shown to reduce lateral local recurrence (LLR) rates compared to total mesorectal excision (TME) alone, particularly in patients with enlarged LPNs, but its impact on overall survival is uncertain. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized according to LPN size and response to nCRT; and through selective LPND based on those criteria, patients could achieve a balance between the benefit of local control and the risk of surgical complications from LPND, such as sexual and urinary dysfunction.

A combined diagnostic model including middle rectal artery visualization for predicting lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

Purpose

This study attempted to establish a combined diagnostic model encompassing visualization of the middle rectal artery (MRA) and other imaging features to improve the diagnostic efficiency of lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis, which is crucial for clinical decision-making in rectal cancer.

Method

One hundred eleven patients receiving bilateral or unilateral lymph node dissection were enrolled, and 140 cases of LLN status on a certain unilateral pelvic sidewall were selected. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) was used to determine whether MRA was visible. Multivariable regression was used to establish a diagnostic model combining MRA visualization with other imaging features to predict LLN metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to test the diagnostic efficacy for LLN metastasis. Ten-fold cross-validation was completed to internally validate the diagnostic model.

Results

Of the 140 LLNs harvested from 111 patients, 76 were positive and 64 were negative for metastases, respectively. The diagnostic model combining the MRA visualization and lymph node short diameter showed a greater efficiency than a single scale (AUC = 0.945, 95% confidence interval = 0.893-0.976, P < 0.001). The mean cross-validated AUC was 0.869 (95% confidence interval = 0.835-0.903).

Conclusion

Our results establish a combined diagnostic model with the help of MRA visualization to yield a high diagnostic efficiency of LLN metastasis in rectal cancer.

Lateral node metastasis in low rectal cancer as a hallmark to predict recurrence patterns

BACKGROUND

Lateral node metastasis confers a poor prognosis in rectal cancer. Several multidisciplinary treatments have been proposed with favorable outcomes. However, appropriate neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments or follow-up plans based on information about the probable recurrence site have not been specified. We aimed to clarify the distinctive features of recurrence patterns for lateral node-positive low rectal cancer according to the lateral and mesorectal lymph node status.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 508 patients with stage III low rectal cancer who underwent lateral node dissection. We investigated the impact of lateral and mesorectal lymph node status on site-specific recurrence rates and patient survival.

RESULTS

Analyses for relapse-free survival revealed the prognostic impact of lateral node positivity in stage III low rectal cancer (p < 0.0001). Lateral node-positive patients exhibited higher risk of overall recurrence, local recurrence, and recurrence in extra-regional nodes than lateral node-negative patients (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). However, lateral node positivity was not statistically associated with a hematogenous recurrence rate. In lateral node-positive patients, both tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-N status and number of lateral nodes involved were revealed as significant prognostic factors (p < 0.0001, both). In addition, the number of lateral nodes involved could be a discriminatory indicator of probabilities of local recurrence and recurrence in extra-regional nodes (p = 0.02, and p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral node-positive low rectal cancer exhibits higher local recurrence and extra-regional node recurrence rates that correlate with the number of lateral nodes involved.

The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes

Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection for local control of rectal cancer: A multicenter study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer by comparing the local control in patients with and without pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM).

Methods

We included 189 patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLND at 13 institutions between 2017 and 2019. Patients with and without pathological LLNM were defined as the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. Propensity score-matching helped to balance the basic characteristics of both groups. The incidences of local recurrence (LR) and lateral lymph node recurrence (LLNR) were compared between the groups.

Results

In the entire cohort, 39 of the 189 patients had pathological LLNM. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 18.3% and 4.0% (p = 0.01) and 7.7% and 3.3% (p = 0.22) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the data from 62 patients were analyzed. No significant differences in LR or LLNR were observed between both groups. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 16.4% and 9.8% (p = 0.46) and 9.7% and 9.8% (p = 0.99) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively.

Conclusion

LLND would lead to comparable local control in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups if the clinicopathological characteristics except for LLNM are similar.

Feasibility, Indications, and Prognostic Significance of Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Middle/Low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Lateral Node Study in China

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy can decrease local recurrence to lateral compartments, thereby providing survival benefits.

OBJECTIVE

The safety of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy was investigated, and the surgical indications and survival benefits of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were established on the basis of preoperative characteristics.

DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective study.

SETTINGS

Three hospitals in China.

PATIENTS

Four hundred nine patients with clinical evidence of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients who received lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received chemoradiotherapy (n = 139) or not (n = 270).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The safety, indications, and survival benefits of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy were investigated.

RESULTS

The surgery times were significantly prolonged by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (291.3 vs 265.5 min; p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that poor/mucinous/signet-ring adenocarcinoma (OR = 4.42, 95% CI, 2.24-11.27; p = 0.031) and postchemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node short-axis diameter ≥7 mm (OR = 15.2, 95% CI, 5.89-53.01; p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. Multivariate prognostic analysis showed that swollen lateral pelvic lymph nodes beyond the obturator or internal iliac as well as the involvement of 3 or more lateral pelvic lymph nodes were independent adverse prognostic factors.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size were the limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is a practicable procedure with acceptable morbidity. Postchemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node short-axis diameter ≥7 mm and poor/signet/mucinous adenocarcinoma could be used for predicting lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis after chemoradiotherapy. However, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection should be carefully considered in patients with swollen lateral pelvic lymph nodes beyond the obturator or internal iliac region or involvement of multiple lateral pelvic lymph nodes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C133 .

VIABILIDAD, INDICACIONES E IMPORTANCIA PRONSTICA DE LA DISECCIN SELECTIVA DE GANGLIOS LINFTICOS PLVICOS LATERALES DESPUS DE QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA PREOPERATORIA EN CNCER DE RECTO MEDIO/INFERIOR RESULTADOS DE UN ESTUDIO MULTICNTRICO DE GANGLIOS LATERALES EN CHINA

ANTECEDENTES:La disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria puede disminuir la recurrencia local en los compartimentos laterales, lo que brinda beneficios de supervivencia.OBJETIVO:Se investigó la seguridad de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria, y se establecieron las indicaciones quirúrgicas y los beneficios de supervivencia de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en función de las características preoperatorias.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico.ESCENARIO:Tres hospitales en China.PACIENTES:Cuatrocientos nueve pacientes con evidencia clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes que recibieron disección de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales se dividieron en dos grupos dependiendo de si recibieron quimiorradioterapia (n = 139) o no (n = 270).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se investigaron la seguridad, las indicaciones y los beneficios de supervivencia de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria.RESULTADOS:Los tiempos de cirugía se prolongaron significativamente con la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria (291,3 vs 265,5 min, p = 0,021). El análisis multivariable demostró que el adenocarcinoma mal diferenciado/mucinoso/en anillo de sello (odds ratio = 4,42, intervalo de confianza del 95%, 2,24-11,27; p = 0,031) y el diámetro del eje corto de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia ≥7 mm (odds ratio = 15,2, intervalo de confianza del 95%, 5,89-53,01; p < 0,001) fueron factores predictivos independientes de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. El análisis pronóstico multivariable mostró que la inflamación de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales más allá del obturador o la ilíaca interna, así como la afectación de tres o más ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales, eran factores pronósticos adversos independientes.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:La quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria combinada con la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales es un procedimiento practicable con una morbilidad aceptable. Posterior a la quimiorradioterapia, el diámetro del eje corto de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales ≥7 mm y el adenocarcinoma pobre/en sello/mucinoso podrían usarse para predecir la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia. Sin embargo, la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales debe considerarse cuidadosamente en pacientes con ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales inflamados más allá del obturador o de la región ilíaca interna o compromiso de múltiples ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C133 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

MRI-based radiomics model for preoperative prediction of extramural venous invasion of rectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) is an important prognostic factor of rectal adenocarcinoma. However, accurate preoperative assessment of EMVI remains difficult.

PURPOSE

To assess EMVI preoperatively through radiomics technology, and use different algorithms combined with clinical factors to establish a variety of models in order to make the most accurate judgments before surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 212 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma between September 2012 and July 2019 were included and distributed to training and validation datasets. Radiomics features were extracted from pretreatment T2-weighted images. Different prediction models (clinical model, logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], support vector machine [SVM], clinical-LR model, clinical-RF model, and clinical-SVM model) were constructed on the basis of radiomics features and clinical factors, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were used to assess the predictive efficacy of different models. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated.

RESULTS

The clinical-LR model exhibited the best diagnostic efficiency with an AUC of 0.962 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.936-0.988) and 0.865 (95% CI = 0.770-0.959), accuracy of 0.899 and 0.828, sensitivity of 0.867 and 0.818, specificity of 0.913 and 0.833, PPV of 0.813 and 0.720, and NPV of 0.940 and 0.897 for the training and validation datasets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics-based prediction model is a valuable tool in EMVI detection and can assist decision-making in clinical practice.

Optimization of therapeutic strategies for selective lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer with clinical suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

Background

Selective lateral lymph node (LLN) dissection with total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is pointed out to reduce lateral compartment recurrence and to improve survival in patients with rectal cancer with LLN metastases. This study aimed to explore the safety, surgical indications, and survival outcomes of LLN dissection after nCRT.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with rectal cancer with clinical evidence of LLN metastases (n = 466) treated across three hospitals in China. Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLN dissection were grouped into nCRT (n = 155) and non-nCRT (n = 291), respectively. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias.

Results

After matching, nCRT did not significantly increase the surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss or postoperative complications (P > 0.05). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, poor/mucinous/signet adenocarcinoma (P = 0.042) and post-nCRT LLN short diameter ≥7 mm (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for pathological LLN metastasis after nCRT. Overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001) were significantly worse in patients with LLN metastasis, which was, however, not an independent risk factor for survival after eliminating confounders. Multivariate prognostic analysis of 40-patient subset with pathological LLN metastasis showed that distant metastasis, metastasis beyond the obturator or internal iliac region, and ≥2 LLN metastasis were independent predictors of poor overall survival.

Conclusions

Selective LLN dissection after nCRT is safe and feasible with acceptable perioperative outcomes. Patients with a post-nCRT LLN short diameter ≥7 mm or poor/mucinous/signet adenocarcinoma should receive supplementary LLN dissection after nCRT. However, patients with distant metastasis, metastasis beyond the obturator or internal iliac region, and involvement of ≥2 LLN may not benefit from LLN dissection, and LLN dissection should be carefully considered in such patients.

Risk factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is one of the prominent reasons for local recurrence (LR) in patients with rectal cancer (RC). The evaluation criteria of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for patients in eastern (mainly in Japan) and western countries have been controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in order to guide surgical methods.

Methods

We searched relevant databases (Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 05 October 2022 to evaluate the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in patients with RC in this meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 24 articles with 5843 patients were included in this study. The overall results showed that female sex, age <60 years, pretherapeutic CEA level >5 ng/ml, clinical T4 stage (cT4), clinical M1 stage (cM1), distance of the tumour from the anal verge (AV) <50 mm, tumour centre located below the peritoneal reflection (Rb), short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥8 mm before nCRT, short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥5 mm after nCRT, border irregularity of LPLN, tumour size ≥50 mm, pathological T3-4 stage (pT3-4), pathological N2 stage (pN2), mesorectal lymph node metastasis (MLNM), lymphatic invasion (LI), venous invasion (VI), CRM (+) and poor differentiation were significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis (P <0.05).

Conclusion

This study summarized almost all potential risk factors of LPLN metastasis and expected to provide effective treatment strategies for patients with LRC. According to the risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis, we can adopt different comprehensive treatment strategies. High-risk patients can perform lateral lymph node dissection to effectively reduce local recurrence; In low-risk patients, we can avoid overtreatment, reduce complications and trauma caused by lateral lymph node dissection, and maximize patient survival and quality of life.

A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy

Background

The aim of the study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed data collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. In addition, in a 7:3 randomized design, all patients were split into two groups (development and validation cohorts). CSS predictors were selected via univariate and multivariate Cox regressions. The nomogram was constructed by analyzing univariate and multivariate predictors. The effectiveness of this nomogram was evaluated by concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Based on the total score of each patient in the development cohort in the nomogram, a risk stratification system was developed. In order to analyze the survival outcomes among different risk groups, Kaplan-Meier method was used.

Results

We selected 4,310 lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy, including a development cohort (70%, 3,017) and a validation cohort (30%, 1,293). The nomogram correlation C-index for the development cohort and the validation cohort was 0.702 (95% CI, 0.687-0.717) and 0.690 (95% CI, 0.665-0.715), respectively. The calibration curves for 3- and 5-year CSS showed great concordance. The 3- and 5-year areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves in the development cohort were 0.758 and 0.740, respectively, and 0.735 and 0.730 in the validation cohort, respectively. Following the establishment of the nomogram, we also established a risk stratification system. According to their nomogram total points, patients were divided into three risk groups. There were significant differences between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (p< 0.05).

Conclusions

As a result of our research, we developed a highly discriminatory and accurate nomogram and associated risk classification system to predict CSS in lymph-node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. This model can help predict the prognosis of patients with lymph- node- positive rectal cancer.

Reappraisal of the Lymphatic Drainage System of the Distal Rectum: Functional Lymphatic Flow into the Presacral Space and Its Clinical Implication in Rectal Cancer Treatment

Understanding the source and route of pelvic metastasis is essential to developing an optimal strategy for controlling local and systemic diseases of rectal cancer. This study aims to delineate the distribution of lymphatic channels and flow from the distal rectum. In fresh-frozen cadaveric hemipelvis specimens, the ligamentous attachment of the distal rectum to the pelvic floor muscles and the presacral fascia were evaluated. Using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, we simultaneously evaluated the gross anatomy of the lymphatic communication of the distal rectum. We also investigated the lymphatic flow in the pelvic cavity intraoperatively in rectal cancer patients who underwent radical rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). In fresh cadavers, multiple small perforating lymphovascular branches exist in the retrorectal space, posteriorly connecting the mesorectum to the presacral fascia. The lymphatic flow from the distal rectum drains directly into the presacral space through the branches. In patients who underwent TME for rectal cancer, intraoperative ICG fluorescence signals were seen in the pelvic sidewalls and the presacral space. This anatomical study demonstrated that the lymphatic flow from the distal rectum runs directly to the pelvic lateral sidewalls and the presacral space, suggesting a possible route of metastasis in distal rectal cancer.

Development and External Validation of a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer

Background

The preoperative prediction of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is crucial in determining further treatment strategies for advanced lower rectal cancer patients. In this study, we established a nomogram model to preoperatively predict LPLN metastasis and then externally validated the accuracy of this model.

Methods

A total of 287 rectal cancer patients who underwent LPLN dissection were included in this study. Among them, 200 patients from the Peking University First Hospital were included in the development set, and 87 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University were included in the independent external validation set. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop the nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed based on its calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility.

Results

Five factors (differentiation grade, extramural vascular invasion, distance of the tumor from the anal verge, perirectal lymph node status, and largest short-axis diameter of LPLN) were identified and included in the nomogram. The nomogram developed based on the analysis showed robust discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.878 (95% CI, 0.824–0.932). The validation set showed good discrimination with an AUC of 0.863 (95% CI, 0.779–0.948). Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusions

The present study proposed a clinical-imaging nomogram with a combination of clinicopathological risk factors and imaging features. After external verification, the predictive power of the nomogram model was satisfactory, and it is expected to be a convenient, visual, and personalized clinical tool for assessing the risk of LPLN metastasis in advanced lower rectal cancer patients.

Preoperative Prediction of Perineural Invasion Status of Rectal Cancer Based on Radiomics Nomogram of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objectives

To compare the predictive performance of different radiomics signatures from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), including four sequences when used individually or combined, and to establish and validate an optimal nomogram for predicting perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer (RC) patients.

Methods

Our retrospective study included 279 RC patients without preoperative antitumor therapy (194 in the training dataset and 85 in the test dataset) who underwent preoperative mpMRI scan between January 2017 and January 2021. Among them, 72 cases were PNI-positive. Then, clinical and radiological variables were collected, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), radiological tumour stage (T_1-4), lymph node stage (N_0-2) and so on. Quantitative radiomics features were extracted and selected from oblique axial T₂-weighted imaging (T₂WI), T₁-weighted imaging (T₁WI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and enhanced T₁WI (T₁CE) sequences. The clinical model was constructed by integrating the final selected clinical and radiological variables. The radiomics signatures included four single-sequence signatures and one fusion signature were built using the respective remaining optimized features. And the nomogram was constructed based on the independent predictors by using multivariable logistic regression. The area under curve (AUC), DeLong test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance.

Results

Ultimately, 20 radiomics features were retained from the four sequences—T₁WI (n = 4), T₂WI (n = 5), ADC (n = 5), and T₁CE (n = 6)—to construct four single-sequence radiomics signatures and one fusion radiomics signature. The fusion radiomics signature performed better than four single-sequence radiomics signatures and clinical model (AUCs of 0.835 and 0.773 vs. 0.680-0.737 and 0.666-0.709 in the training and test datasets, respectively). The nomogram constructed by incorporating CEA, tumour stage and rad-score performed best, with AUCs of 0.869 and 0.864 in the training and test datasets, respectively. Delong test showed that the nomogram was significantly different from the clinical model and four single-sequence radiomics signatures (P < 0.05). Moreover, calibration curves demonstrated good agreement, and DCA highlighted benefits of the nomogram.

Conclusions

The comprehensive nomogram can preoperatively and noninvasively predict PNI status, provide a convenient and practical tool for treatment strategy, and help optimize individualized clinical decision-making in RC patients.

Risk factors and prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal patients with clinically suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

AIM

It is still controversial whether the addition of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) to total mesorectal excision (TME) can provide a survival benefit after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer patients with pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (LPNM).

METHODS

Patients with clinically suspected LPNM who underwent nCRT followed by TME + LPND were systematically reviewed and divided into the positive LPN group (n = 15) and the negative LPN group (n = 58). Baseline characteristics, clinicopathological data and survival outcomes were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 73 patients undergoing TME + LPND after nCRT, the pathological LPNM rate was 20.5% (15/73). Multivariate analysis showed that a post-nCRT LPN short diameter ≥ 7 mm (OR 49.65; 95% CI 3.98-619.1; P = 0.002) and lymphatic invasion (OR 9.23; 95% CI 1.28-66.35; P = 0.027) were independent risk factors for pathological LPNM. The overall recurrence rate of patients with LPNM was significantly higher than that of patients without LPNM (60.0% vs 27.6%, P = 0.018). Multivariate regression analysis identified that LPNM was an independent risk factor not only for overall survival (OS) (HR 3.82; 95% CI 1.19-12.25; P = 0.024) but also for disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 2.33; 95% CI 1.02-5.14; P = 0.044). Moreover, N1-N2 stage was another independent risk factor for OS (HR 7.41; 95% CI 1.63-33.75; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-nCRT LPN short diameter ≥ 7 mm and lymphatic invasion were risk factors for pathological LPNM after nCRT. Furthermore, patients with pathological LPNM still show an elevated overall recurrence rate and poor prognosis after TME + LPND. Strict patient selection and intensive perioperative chemotherapy are crucial factors to ensure the efficacy of LPND.

Therapeutic significance of D3 dissection for low rectal cancer: a comparison of dissections between the lateral pelvic lymph nodes and the lymph nodes along the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

D3 dissection is the standard treatment modality for locally advanced low rectal cancer in Japan. The benefit of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) dissection (LPLND) and lymph nodes along the root of inferior mesenteric artery (253 LN) dissection (253 LND) for low rectal cancer has often been studied separately, and few studies have investigated their benefit in the same cohort. This study aimed to clarify the therapeutic significance of dissection of the LPLN in comparison to that of dissection of the 253 LN for low rectal cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 3508 patients with treatment-naïve stage I-III low rectal cancer who underwent mesorectal excision between 1997 and 2012. They were identified from the Japanese Study Group for Postoperative Follow-Up of Colorectal Cancer database. The rates of metastasis, survival, and therapeutic value index (5-year overall survival (OS) rate multiplied by metastatic rate for lymph node metastasis) were compared between LPLN and 253 LN.

RESULTS

The rates of LPLN metastasis and 253 LN metastasis were 17.9% and 1.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS was significantly different between patients with and without LPLN metastasis (55.0% vs 85.5%, P < 0.0001) and between patients with and without 253 LN metastasis (36.2% vs 83.3%, P < 0.0001). The therapeutic value indexes of LPLN and 253 LN were 9.85 and 0.54, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LPLND may have more therapeutic value than 253 LND for patients with treatment-naïve low rectal cancer, although both the patients with LPLN metastasis and those with 253 LN metastasis remained to have poor prognosis.

Clinical characteristics and predictors of permanent stoma in rectal cancer patients underwent anterior resections: the value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index

OBJECTIVES

This study was aimed to investigate the correlation between preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and permanent stoma (PS) in patients with defunctioning stoma (DS) after anterior resections and, based on it, to reveal the clinical value of PNI on clinical strategies about the selection of stoma location.

METHODS

A total of 281 consecutive rectal cancer patients who accepted anterior resection and DS in the National Hepatobiliary and Enteric Surgery Research Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from June 2008 to June 2018 were enrolled in this study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for PNI was performed to discriminate PS. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to identify the clinical characteristics and risk factors for PS. Specific reasons for patients with DS turned into PS were reviewed.

RESULTS

ROC curve analysis defined PNI cutoff level of 45.85 corresponding to PS (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.71, 77% sensitivity, 56.9% specificity). Low PNI (OR = 3.23, P = 0.005), tumor crossing the peritoneal reflection (PR) (OR = 3.42, P = 0.003), postoperative distant metastasis (OR = 6.31, P < 0.001) were independently associated with PS. Besides, anastomotic complications (31.4%), poor oncological outcomes (35.3%), and personal preferences (33.3%) were the specific reasons for patients turning into PS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PNI is an independent prognostic factor to predict PS in patients who underwent anterior resection and DS. Therefore, combined with other clinical characteristics and predictors, preoperative measurements of PNI could provide a significant support for clinical decision on patients prepared to accept anterior resection and DS.