Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Japanese subgroup analysis

Clinical outcomes and treatment patterns of maintenance avelumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter collaborative study

BACKGROUND

The JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with maintenance avelumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma UC (la/mUC) who achieved disease control following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1 L-PBC). However, real-world data on eligibility, utilization, and outcomes of maintenance avelumab therapy remain limited.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with la/mUC who received 1 L-PBC. Eligibility for maintenance avelumab therapy was determined based on the best overall response to 1 L-PBC, with patients who achieved stable disease or a partial or complete response considered eligible. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors among patients with la/mUC who received maintenance avelumab.

RESULTS

Of 161 prospective patients, 67.1% were eligible for maintenance avelumab therapy, and 46.3% of eligible patients received the treatment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) following avelumab initiation was 10.2 months, whereas the median OS was not reached. Prognostic factors associated with PFS included the presence of liver metastases, elevated C-reactive protein (> 1.0 g/dL), and administration of more than five cycles of 1 L-PBC. Adverse events occurred in 60% of patients treated with avelumab, with 16% experiencing grade 3-4 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

We emphasize the real-world applicability of maintenance avelumab for Japanese patients with la/mUC. Maintenance avelumab demonstrated favorable survival outcomes, consistent with clinical trial data. Identifying prognostic factors and optimizing treatment sequencing are essential strategies for improving outcomes in this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant nivolumab after radical surgery for high-risk urothelial carcinoma: a preliminary report of real-world data from a single institution

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial demonstrated superiority of adjuvant nivolumab over placebo after radical surgery in patients with high-risk urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, real-world data on the efficacy and safety profile of adjuvant nivolumab in Japan have not been reported.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients with high-risk UC who received adjuvant nivolumab therapy following radical surgery between 2022 and 2024 at our institution. We evaluated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with high-risk UC receiving adjuvant nivolumab therapy following radical surgery were identified, and median follow-up was 11 months. Three patients experienced grade 3 irAEs, and 8 discontinued adjuvant nivolumab therapy due to irAEs. No grade 4 or 5 irAEs were observed. Eight patients have completed 1 year of treatment, and nine are currently on treatment. Nine patients had recurrences and one died of cancer. Of the nine patients with recurrences, six relapsed while on adjuvant nivolumab therapy, two relapsed after completing 1 year of treatment, and one relapsed after discontinuation of irAE. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 100% and 90%, respectively, and median OS was not reached. The 1- and 2-year DFS rates were 70% and 60%, respectively, and median DFS was 26 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant nivolumab appears to have some efficacy in Japanese patients. Since this is a postoperative adjuvant therapy, careful patient selection is warranted.

Exploring the Immunoresponse in Bladder Cancer Immunotherapy

Bladder cancer (BC) represents a wide spectrum of diseases, ranging from recurrent non-invasive tumors to advanced stages that require intensive treatments. BC accounts for an estimated 500,000 new cases and 200,000 deaths worldwide every year. Understanding the biology of BC has changed how this disease is diagnosed and treated. Bladder cancer is highly immunogenic, involving innate and adaptive components of the immune system. Although little is still known of how immune cells respond to BC, immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) remains the gold standard in high-risk non-muscle invasive BC. For muscle-invasive BC and metastatic stages, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 have emerged as potent therapies, enhancing immune surveillance and tumor cell elimination. This review aims to unravel the immune responses involving innate and adaptive immune cells in BC that will contribute to establishing new and promising therapeutic options, while reviewing the immunotherapies currently in use in bladder cancer.

J-AVENUE: A retrospective, real-world study evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan

OBJECTIVES

The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial showed that avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We report findings from J-AVENUE (NCT05431777), a real-world study of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan.

METHODS

Medical charts of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who received avelumab maintenance between February and November 2021, were reviewed. Patients were followed until June 2022. The primary endpoint was patient characteristics; secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

In 79 patients analyzed, median age was 72 years (range, 44-86). Primary tumor site was upper tract in 45.6% and bladder in 54.4%. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin + gemcitabine (63.3%). Median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. Best response to chemotherapy was complete response in 10.1%, partial response in 58.2%, and stable disease in 31.6%. Median treatment-free interval before avelumab was 4.9 weeks. With avelumab first-line maintenance therapy, the disease control rate was 58.2%, median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.4), and median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-9.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from J-AVENUE show the effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan in clinical practice, with similar progression-free survival to JAVELIN Bladder 100 and previous real-world studies, supporting its use as a standard of care.

Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma 2023 by the Japanese Urological Association

This article is an English translation of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (2nd edition) published in June 2023. The Japanese Urological Association's (JUA) Guidelines Committee on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) created a 2023 update guideline to support clinicians' current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate its recommendations into clinical practice. The new guideline adhered as closely as possible to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0. Findings related to epidemiological, pathological, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed. In addition, seven clinical questions (CQs) were set to determine the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. Preconceptions and biases were removed from the preparation process, the overall evidence was evaluated appropriately, and recommendations were made after fully considering the balance between benefits and harms. Although the evidence is still insufficient to be taken up as a CQ, the latest important information is described in seven columns, and clinical issues that should be resolved in the future related to the CQ are described as recommendations for tomorrow. We hope that these guidelines will help medical professionals, patients, and their families involved in the treatment of UTUC in their decision-making, and hope that a critical review of these guidelines will lead to further refinements in the next edition.

Treatment patterns in metastatic bladder cancer in Japan: results of the CancerMPact® survey 2020

Aim: To assess physician-reported treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in Japan. Methods: 76 physicians completed the CancerMPact® survey in July 2020, considering patients treated within 6 months. Results: Physicians treated a mean of 38.1 patients per month. Of cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients, 97.6 and 89.3%, respectively, received first-line platinum-based therapy, most commonly cisplatin plus gemcitabine (72.9%) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (59.7%). 1.6 and 5.6% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively. 48.4 and 45.0%, respectively, progressed and received second-line therapy, most commonly with pembrolizumab (61.7%). Conclusion: In 2020, most patients with metastatic bladder cancer in Japan received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, >50% received no subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for new treatment regimens to improve outcomes and maximize first-line treatment benefits.

Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs. BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Asian subgroup analysis

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial showed significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) with avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) vs. BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) that had not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. Here, efficacy and safety were assessed from the initial analysis of the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (data cutoff October 21, 2019) in patients enrolled in Asian countries.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC that had not progressed with 4 to 6 cycles of first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin) were randomized 1:1 to receive avelumab first-line maintenance + BSC or BSC alone, stratified by best response to first-line chemotherapy and visceral vs. nonvisceral disease when initiating first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was OS assessed from randomization in all patients and patients with PD-L1+ tumors (Ventana SP263 assay). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients in JAVELIN Bladder 100 were enrolled in Asian countries (Hong Kong, India, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). In this Asian subgroup, 73 and 74 patients received avelumab + BSC or BSC alone, respectively. Median OS was 25.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to not estimable [NE]) in the avelumab + BSC arm vs. 18.7 months (95% CI, 12.8-NE) in the BSC alone arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.43-1.26]); median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-7.5) vs. 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.9-1.9), respectively (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38-0.86]). In the avelumab + BSC vs. BSC alone arms, grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (any causality) occurred in 44.4% vs. 16.2%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the avelumab + BSC arm were anemia (9.7%), amylase increased (5.6%), and urinary tract infection (4.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy and safety results for avelumab first-line maintenance in the Asian subgroup of JAVELIN Bladder 100 were generally consistent with those in the overall trial population. These data support the use of avelumab first-line maintenance as standard of care for Asian patients with advanced UC that has not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. NCT02603432.

Early and late recurrence patterns of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains poor because of high incidences of recurrence. The risk factors, patterns, and long-term prognosis in patients with early recurrence and late recurrence (ER and LR) for PDAC after PD were studied.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent PD for PDAC were analyzed. Recurrence was divided into ER (ER ≤1 years) and LR (LR >1 years) using the time to recurrence after surgery. Characteristics and patterns of initial recurrence, and postrecurrence survival (PRS) were compared between patients with ER and LR.

RESULTS

Among the 634 patients, 281 (44.3%) and 249 (39.3%) patients developed ER and LR, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative CA19-9 levels, resection margin status, and tumor differentiation were significantly associated with both ER and LR, while lymph node metastasis and perineal invasion were associated with LR. Patients with ER, when compared with patients with LR, showed a significantly higher proportion of liver-only recurrence ( P <0.05), and worse median PRS (5.2 vs. 9.3 months, P <0.001). Lung-only recurrence had a significantly longer PRS when compared with liver-only recurrence ( P <0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ER and irregular postoperative recurrence surveillance were independently associated with a worse prognosis ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for ER and LR after PD are different for PDAC patients. Patients who developed ER had worse PRS than those who developed LR. Patients with lung-only recurrence had a significantly better prognosis than those with other recurrent sites.

Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo following radical surgery for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients enrolled in the phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial demonstrated superiority of adjuvant nivolumab over placebo after radical surgery in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. However, the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nivolumab in Japanese patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma have not been clarified.

METHODS

Patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma were randomized to adjuvant nivolumab 240 mg or placebo (every 2 weeks via intravenous infusion) up to 120 days after radical surgery in CheckMate 274.

RESULTS

Of 49 patients in the Japanese subgroup, 27 and 22 patients were randomized to nivolumab and placebo, respectively. Eleven and 8 patients, respectively, had tumor PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more. The median disease-free survival times in the nivolumab and placebo groups were 29.67 months (95% confidence interval 7.79-not reached) and 9.72 months (95% confidence interval 4.73-not reached), respectively (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.35-1.69). The corresponding values in patients with tumor PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more were 29.67 months (95% confidence interval 2.63-not reached) and 25.95 months (95% confidence interval 5.59-not reached) (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.31-3.92), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of Grade 3-4 occurred in 25.9 and 13.6% of patients in the nivolumab and placebo groups, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the nivolumab group were lipase increased, amylase increased and diarrhea. The changes in quality of life scores from baseline over time were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety results in the Japanese subgroup were consistent with the overall population of CheckMate 274.