Impact of skeletal muscle mass on the prognosis of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Prognostic factors in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prognostic markers for overall survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are well established but remain unclear following neoadjuvant therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine factors associated with overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from January 2010 until May 2024. Studies that reported univariable and multivariable hazard ratios were included if patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy and resection for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse-variance random-effects models.

RESULTS

Among 2208 unique articles identified by the search, 92 were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 85 were of "good" and 7 of "poor" quality. The neoadjuvant therapy regimen was described in 84 studies of which 62 included patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Margin status, nodal disease, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage, and normalization of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) after neoadjuvant therapy were prognostic for overall survival, whereas age, sex, perineural invasion, baseline tumor size, and baseline CA19-9 were not. The test for subgroup differences between ypN substages was not statistically significant in the multivariable model. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with better survival than other regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis identified margin status, nodal disease, AJCC T-stage, and normalization of CA19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy as prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with resected localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy.

Computed Tomography-Based Sarcopenia and Pancreatic Cancer Survival-A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Exploring the Influence of Definition Criteria, Prevalence, and Treatment Intention

Background: Sarcopenia has been associated with poor outcomes in pancreatic cancer (PC). However, published results are heterogeneous in terms of study design, oncological outcomes, and sarcopenia measurements. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of computed tomography (CT)-based sarcopenia on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with PC, considering potential confounders such as the CT-based method and thresholds used to define sarcopenia, as well as treatment intention. Methods: We systematically searched databases for observational studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS in PC patients stratified by CT-based sarcopenia status. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled crude and adjusted HRs (cHRs and aHRs, respectively), with subgroup analyses based on sarcopenia measurement methods, cutoff values, sarcopenia prevalence, and treatment intention. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and τ2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. Results: Data from 48 studies were included. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with worse OS (pooled cHR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.38-1.82; pooled aHR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.16-1.66) and worse PFS (pooled cHR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.29-1.86; pooled aHR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.55). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly different, stronger associations in studies using stricter sarcopenia cutoffs (<50 cm2/m2 for males) and in patients undergoing curative treatments. Heterogeneity was substantial across analyses (I2 > 67%), but with generally low τ2 values (0.01-0.25). Egger's test indicated potential publication bias for OS (p < 0.001), but no significant bias was observed for PFS (p = 0.576). Conclusions: Sarcopenia determined by CT is an independent predictor of poor OS and PFS in PC, but this association varies depending on the cutoff used for its definition as well as on the treatment intention. Therefore, its routine assessment in clinical practice could provide valuable prognostic information, but future research should focus on standardizing sarcopenia assessment methods.

An exploratory study of serum creatine kinase as a prognostic marker for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: looking into the relationship with body composition

BACKGROUND

Among cancer patients, pancreatic cancer patients have the highest rate of sarcopenia, which is a critical prognostic factor. Serum creatine kinase (CK) is closely related to skeletal muscle mass and has been reported to decline with the progression of cancer. This study investigated whether preoperative serum CK is associated with the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Data were obtained from patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer between June 2016 and March 2022. The prognostic significance of CK was analyzed based on sex-stratified groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine prognostic factors. Body composition was analyzed based on preoperative abdominal CT images to explore the sex-specific associations between skeletal muscle area (SMA) and serum CK levels.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients were included in this study. Sarcopenia was presented in 70 patients (42.2%). A low serum CK level showed a significant correlation with the diagnosis of sarcopenia in male patients (P = 0.026). The levels of CK did not predict the outcome in female patients, while a low preoperative CK was notably linked to shorter OS in male patients (median OS: 15 months vs. 33 months, P = 0.011; median DFS: 5 months vs. 14 months, P = 0.007). Multivariate analyses further confirmed the effect of CK in predicting OS (CK>44 IU/L, HR:0.226, 95% CI:0.107-0.478, P < 0.001) and DFS (CK>44 IU/L, HR:0.272, 95% CI:0.139-0.529, P < 0.001) of male patients. Correlation analysis revealed a significant association between SMA and CK levels in male patients (r = 0.225, P = 0.025), and such a correlation was not observed in female patients (r = 0.088, P = 0.478).

CONCLUSION

The pretherapeutic CK may represent a simple marker for predicting poor survival in male patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, thereby aiding in the selection of therapeutic strategies.

Prevalence of Sarcopenia Determined by Computed Tomography in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Introduction: Sarcopenia, a condition characterized by a loss of skeletal muscle mass, is increasingly recognized as a significant factor influencing patient outcomes in pancreatic cancer (PC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with PC using computed tomography and to explore how different measurement methods and cut-off values impact such prevalence. Materials and Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases was performed, identifying 48 observational studies involving 9063 patients. Results: The overall pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was 45% (95% CI, 40-50%), but varied significantly by the method used: 47% when measured with the skeletal muscle index and 33% when assessed with the total psoas area. In addition, in studies using SMI, sarcopenia prevalence was 19%, 45%, and 57% for cutoff values <40 cm2/m2, 40-50 cm2/m2, and >50 cm2/m2, respectively. Moreover, the prevalence was higher in patients receiving palliative care (50%) compared to those treated with curative intent (41%). High heterogeneity was observed across all analyses, underscoring the need for standardized criteria in sarcopenia assessment. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the substantial variability in sarcopenia prevalence, which could influence patient outcomes, and stress the importance of consensus in measurement techniques to improve clinical decision making and research comparability.

Patient vulnerability is associated with poor prognosis following upfront hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

With the rapid aging of populations worldwide, the number of vulnerable patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer has increased. This study aimed to examine the association between vulnerability and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHODS

Consecutive 101 patients undergoing upfront hepatectomy for CRLM between 2004 and 2020 were included. The preoperative vulnerability was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from one (very fit) to nine (terminally ill), and frailty was defined as a CFS score of ≥ 4. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was utilized to investigate associations of frailty with disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Of the 101 patients, 12 (12%) had frailty. Associations between frailty and surgical outcomes, namely, the incidence of 90-day mortality and postoperative complications, were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In the multivariable analyses, after adjusting for clinical risk scores calculated using six factors (timing of liver metastasis, primary tumor lymph node status, number of liver tumors, size of the largest tumor, extrahepatic metastatic disease, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level) to predict recurrence following hepatectomy for CRLM, preoperative frailty was found to be an independent risk factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR]:2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.72, P = 0.036), OS (HR:4.17, 95% CI 1.43-10.89, P = 0.011), and CSS (HR:3.49, 95% CI 1.09-9.60, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative frailty was associated with worse DFS, OS, and CSS after upfront hepatectomy for CRLM. Assessment and improvement of patient vulnerability may provide a favorable prognosis for patients with CRLM.