The treatment of anal fistulas with biologically derived products: is innovation better than conventional surgical treatment? An update

Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in patients underwent surgery for benign anorectal diseases: a nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of anorectal surgery. This study was to determine the incidence of POUR in anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases, identify its risk factors, and establish a nomogram for prediction of POUR.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of patients were collected, and the incidence of POUR was analyzed. Univariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with POUR, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for POUR. A nomogram for the preoperative prediction of POUR using a logistic regression model was developed (n = 609).

RESULTS

The incidence of POUR after anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases was 19.05%. The independent risk factors for POUR were: female (P = 0.007); male with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (P = 0.001); postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score > 6 (P = 0.002); patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) (P = 0.016); and a surgery time > 30 min (P = 0.039). In the nomogram, BPH is the most important factor affecting the occurrence of POUR, followed by a postoperative VAS score > 6, PCEA, surgery time > 30 min, and sex has the least influence.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases, preventive measures can be taken to reduce the risk of POUR, taking into account the following risk factors: female or male with BPH, severe postoperative pain, PCEA, and surgery time > 30 min. Furthermore, we developed and validated an easy-to-use nomogram for preoperative prediction of POUR in anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

China Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000039684, 05/11/2020.

Evaluation surgical strategies in perianal fistulas treatment: Efficacy draining seton compared to other surgical approaches; a case-control study

Background and Aims

Perianal fistula is a prevalent anorectal condition originating from an infectious crypt extending to the external opening. Multiple surgical methods exist for treating perianal fistulas; however, selecting the appropriate options is still controversial. Our study aims to evaluate seton replacement versus other surgical methods in treating perianal fistula.

Methods

This study recruited 72 patients presenting with perianal discharge and diagnosed with perianal fistula through intra-sphincteric, trans-sphincteric, and supra-sphincteric examinations at Imam Reza and Besat Hospitals from July 2022 up to March 2023. Regarding case-control design, patients were divided into two groups: the first group (n = 36) underwent seton insertion, while the control group (n = 36) received alternative surgical methods. Follow-up was conducted for 1 month post-discharge, with monthly visits for 6 months. Patients were evaluated for fistula tract healing, seton loosening, and daily secretion rate (based on infected pads) during each visit. Finally, the two groups were compared in terms of improvement rates.

Results

In the seton group, approximately 94.4% of patients showed improvement. However, the difference between the groups was insignificant (p = 0.494). Seton replacement was performed in 52% of patients, with the majority requiring replacement twice (61%). Improvement rates were highest among cases with two seton replacements, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). Following seton replacement, the most common treatment methods were endoanal flap and fistulotomy, with observed improvement in 10 cases for each procedure.

Conclusion

This study highlights that draining seton remains a primary choice for intermediate treatment due to its satisfactory improvement rate and lower requirement for replacement, especially up to two times.

Fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty in complex anal fistula treatment: a hospital-based long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no agreement on the best treatment for complex anal fistulas with the least recurrence and lowest complication rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term recurrence and incontinence after fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) in a group of patients with complex perianal fistula.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was done at the colorectal ward of Taleghani Hospital of Tehran from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients with anal fistula who underwent FIPS were studied. After surgery, patients were evaluated regularly by a colorectal surgeon for fistula recurrence and incontinence. Recurrence was described as a new fistula tract formation after the initial cure and failure of healing in the operation site or any purulent discharge from the fistula tract and openings. In addition, the patient's continence was assessed based on the Wexner score.

RESULTS

There were 335 patients (66 men and 269 women, mean age 42.74 ± 12.44 years), 191 of them with low fistula and 144 with high fistula. Thirteen patients (3.90%) experienced recurrence (all had a low fistula). Thirty-nine patients (11.64%), 19 patients with high and 20 patients with low fistula, had a Wexner score ≥ 3 during the follow-up. Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. Male patients (OR = 2.67, 95% CI 0.84, 8.45, p = 0.094, adjusted OR = 4.41, 95% CI 1.05, 18.48, p = 0.042), patients with low fistula (p = 0.001), and recurrent cases had a significantly higher rate of recurrence (OR = 10.38, 95% CI 3.24-33.20 p ≤ 0.001, adjusted OR = 23.36, 95% CI 4.35-125.39, p ≤ 0.001). A significant correlation between body mass index > 35 kg/m² and incontinence was found (OR = 4.40, 95% CI 1.35, 14.33, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, an acceptable healing rate and a low percentage of complications following FIPS were seen in patients with complex anal fistula. Randomized clinical trials with appropriate follow-up duration and sample size comparing different surgical methods in these patients are needed to confirm these results.

Comparison of Patient-Controlled Caudal Epidural Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Perianal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the efficacy between patient-controlled caudal epidural analgesia (PCCA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after perianal surgery, to provide a feasible solution to postoperative pain.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comprising 100 patients who underwent caudal epidural block on perianal surgery at Chengdu Shang Jin Nan Fu Hospital of West China Hospital at Sichuan University between April and August 2020. Patients were randomly divided into the PCCA and PCIA groups. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery, and at the first dressing change and first defecation. The lower limb mobility in the post-anesthetic recovery room (PACU) was determined. The analgesic effect, usage amount of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), usage amount and frequency of remedial analgesic measures, number of individuals who must be catheterized, and incidence of adverse reactions were recorded. Satisfaction of postoperative analgesic effect and convenience of PCA were also assessed.

RESULTS

The patients in the PCCA group had significantly lower VAS scores at 4, 6, 24, 48, 72 h, the first dressing change, and the first defecation compared with the PCIA group. There were more patients receiving postoperative remedial analgesics in the PCIA group than in the PCCA group. The outcome of the number of PCA and catheterization rates did not differ significantly between the groups. There were two cases of sensory numbness below the S3 plane. The major postoperative complications in the PCIA group were pruritus (3/47, 6.4%), nausea, and vomiting (6/47, 12.8%) (one case combined with pruritus). Patients in the PCCA group were more satisfied with the analgesic effect, while those in the PCIA group were more satisfied with the convenience.

CONCLUSION

In the postoperative analgesia program of perianal surgery, PCCA may provide a better analgesic effect without increasing the incidence of complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier, ChiCTR2000038425, September 2020, retrospectively registered.

Surgery for anal fistulae: state of the art

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Anal fistulae (AF) are considered a challenge for colorectal surgeons, as they recur if not properly operated. Being a septic disease, they are correlated with immunodeficiency and surgery may be followed by anal incontinence (AI). The aim of this paper is to suggest a state-of-the-art treatment of AF.

METHODS

Pathogenesis, classification, diagnostic tools, intraoperative assessment, and surgeries proposed for AF have been reviewed, together with the results following conventional surgery and innovations aimed at sphincters' preservation.

RESULTS

Stress causes immunodepression and favors anal sepsis, and heavy smoking facilitates AF recurrences. Evacuation fistulography, MRI, and transanal ultrasound may help the diagnosis. Fistulotomy allows high cure rate, up to 96.4%, but may cause up to 64% of AI in transsphincteric AF. Fistulectomy with rectal advancement flap is effective in 80% of these cases and avoids AI. Other options are either suturing of AF internal orifice or positioning a cutting seton. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula track (LIFT) is a costless alternative carrying a success of 57-99% with 0-23% AI. Costly innovations, i.e., autologous stem cells, porcine derma sheet (Permacol), video-assisted fistula excision (VAAFT), porcine matrix (PLUG), and laser closure (FiLaC), minimize AI, but may carry AF recurrence. Their grades of recommendation range between 2B and 2C in the Guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative incontinence in transsphincteric AF may be minimized by both costless and costly sphincter-saving procedures, the latter carrying higher recurrence rate. The success of surgery may be increased by a different lifestyle.

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic anal fistula. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. Surgery is the main treatment and several procedures have been developed, but the risks of recurrence and of impairment of continence still seem to be an unresolved issue. This statement reviews the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Anal Fistula Laser Closure: the length of fistula is the Achilles' heel

BACKGROUND

Laser closure is a novel sphincter-saving technique for the treatment of anal fistula. The aim of this study was to report middle term results of laser treatment without closure of the internal orifice and to identify prognostic factors to improve selection criteria and maximize healing.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients treated with laser for transphinteric anal fistula. A diode laser emitting laser energy of 12W at a wavelength of 1470 nm was used. The relationship between fistula healing and age, sex, previous fistula surgery, location of fistula, and length of fistula tract was investigated. A successful outcome was defined by the complete healing of the surgical wound and external opening for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (16 males, median age 52 years, range 26-72 years) underwent laser fistula closure between January 2015 and December 2016. Cure was achieved in 10 patients (33.3%). The mean follow-up was 11.30 months (range 6-24 months). Patients with persistent or recurrent fistula were offered repeat surgery. Eventually 4 underwent laser treatment once more. Two patients were cured leading to an overall healing rate of 40% (12 out of 30). Only 4 minor complications occurred (13.3%). No worsening of anal continence was registered. Only fistula length had a statistically significant correlation with successful treatment. Fistula tracts shorter than 30 mm were associated with a primary healing rate of 58.3% while tracts longer than 30 mm were cured in only 16.6% of cases (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Laser closure is a safe and effective treatment for transphinteric anal fistula. The fistula length is the only significant prognostic factor when closing anal fistulas exclusively with laser: shorter fistulas have a better outcome.

Initial Experience with Fibrin Glue Treatment of Anal Fistulae in Children

Pediatric anal fistulae commonly result from recurrent perianal abscesses, of which nearly 50 per cent develop an anal fistula. The purpose of this study was to report the results of using fibrin glue to treat anal fistula in pediatric patients. Infants and children with recurrent perianal abscesses and anal fistulae were treated with either fistulectomy or fibrin glue. Demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the groups. A total of 34 children were included; 27 received fistulectomy (median age eight months) and seven received fibrin glue treatment (median age 14 months). No significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between the two groups (all, P > 0.05). Median follow-up duration was significantly higher in the fibrin glue group compared with that in the fistulectomy group (five months vs one month, P = 0.003). There was one recurrence in the fistulectomy group, and no recurrences in the fibrin glue group (P = 1.0). No complications occurred in either group. Fibrin glue treatment is a simple and effective treatment alternative in the management of anal fistula in children, offering the advantage of sphincter muscle-sparing and reduced risk of fecal incontinence.

Total fistulectomy, sphincteroplasty and closure of the residual cavity for trans-sphincteric perianal fistula in the elderly patient

BACKGROUND

Perianal fistula is a complex and frequent disease. At present, no treatment nor technique has shown an absolute superiority in terms of efficacy and recurrence rate. The technique has to be chosen considering the balance between faecal continence preservation and disease eradication. Rarely concomitant perianal abscess and fistula are treated at the same time, and often time to complete recovery is long.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of treating the abscess and the fistula tract in one procedure with total fistulectomy, sphincteroplasty and an almost complete closure of the residual cavity, thus reducing the healing time in older patients.

METHODS

A non-randomized single-centre series of 86 patients from 2007 to 2012 with low-medium trans-sphincteric perianal fistula (< 30% of external sphincter involvement) with or without synchronous perianal abscess were treated with total fistulectomy, sphincteroplasty and closure of the residual cavity technique.

RESULTS

Success rate was 97.7% with a healing time of 4 weeks; overall morbidity was 16.2%; recurrence rate was 2.3%; no major alterations of continence were observed.

DISCUSSION

Fistulectomy, sphincteroplasty and closure of the residual cavity are associated with a low rate of recurrence and good faecal continence preservation in older patients. This technique can be safely used even with a concomitant perianal abscess, with reduction in healing time and in the number of surgical procedures needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Total fistulectomy with sphincteroplasty and partial closure of the residual cavity, as described, is a safe procedure but has to be performed by dedicated colorectal surgeons.

Treatment of Fistula-In-Ano with Fistula Plug - a Review Under Special Consideration of the Technique

Introduction

In a recent Cochrane review, the authors concluded that there is an urgent need for well-powered, well-conducted randomized controlled trials comparing various modes of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Ten randomized controlled trials were available for analyses: There were no significant differences in recurrence rates or incontinence rates in any of the studied comparisons. The following article reviews the studies available for treatment of fistula-in-ano with a fistula plug with special attention paid to the technique.

Material and Methods

PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane medical database were searched up to July 2015. Sixty-four articles were relevant for this review.

Results

Healing rates of 50–60% can be expected for treatment of complex anal fistula with a fistula plug, with a plug-extrusion rate of 10–20%. Such results can be achieved not only with plugs made of porcine intestinal submucosa but also those made of other biological or synthetic bioabsorbable mesh materials. Important technical steps are firm suturing of the head of the plug in the primary opening and wide drainage of the secondary opening.

Discussion

Treatment of a complex fistula-in-ano with a fistula plug is an option with a success rate of 50–60% with low complication rate. Further improvements in technique and better studies are needed.

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: a consensus statement developed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic fistula formation. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. The key to successful treatment is the eradication of the primary track. As surgery may lead to a disturbance of continence, several sphincter-preserving techniques have been developed. This consensus statement examines the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal fistula

PURPOSE

Perianal fistulas, and specifically high perianal fistulas, remain a surgical treatment challenge. Many techniques have, and still are, being developed to improve outcome after surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed for surgical treatments for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas.

METHODS

Medline (Pubmed, Ovid), Embase and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials on surgical treatments for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas. Two independent reviewers selected articles for inclusion based on title, abstract and outcomes described. The main outcome measurement was the recurrence/healing rate. Secondary outcomes were continence status, quality of life and complications.

RESULTS

The number of randomized trials available was low. Fourteen studies could be included in the review. A meta-analysis could only be performed for the mucosa advancement flap versus the fistula plug, and did not show a result in favour of either technique in recurrence or complication rate. The mucosa advancement flap was the most investigated technique, but did not show an advantage over any other technique. Other techniques identified in randomized studies were seton treatment, medicated seton treatment, fibrin glue, autologous stem cells, island flap anoplasty, rectal wall advancement flap, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, sphincter reconstruction, sphincter-preserving seton and techniques combined with antibiotics. None of these techniques seem superior to each other.

CONCLUSIONS

The best surgical treatment for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas could not be identified. More randomized controlled trials are needed to find the best treatment. The mucosa advancement flap is the most investigated technique available.

Biomaterials in the treatment of anal fistula: hope or hype?

Anal fistula (AF) presents a chronic problem for patients and colorectal surgeons alike. Surgical treatment may result in impairment of continence and long-term risk of recurrence. Treatment options for AFs vary according to their location and complexity. The ideal approach should result in low recurrence rates and minimal impact on continence. New technical approaches involving biologically derived products such as biological mesh, fibrin glue, fistula plug, and stem cells have been applied in the treatment of AF to improve outcomes and decrease recurrence rates and the risk of fecal incontinence. In this review, we will highlight the current evidence and describe our personal experience with these novel approaches.

The role of loose seton in the management of anal fistula: a multicenter study of 200 patients

BACKGROUND

Perianal abscesses and fistulae-in-ano are a common anorectal complaint causing significant distress to patients, and present a considerable treatment challenge. Principal of treatment is achieving closure of the fistula while maintaining continence. There are numerous treatment approaches with large debate about which method is "ideal." Our aim was to assess the tolerance and efficacy of loose seton placement in the treatment for fistula-in-ano.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter review of the management of anal fistulae with loose seton placement over a three-year period. All patients underwent a standardized procedure, and were rescheduled for an elective change of seton until fistula resolution. Patients' demographics, medical history, comorbidities, overall number and time interval between seton placements, tolerance, and morbidity of the procedure were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 200 consecutive patients had loose seton placement. 69.5 % (n = 139) were males, and mean age was 42.6 years. The median number of setons required for each patient was 3 (range 1-8; mean 2.84). The mean interval between changes was 3.08 months (range 2-4 months). All patients had successful clearance of fistula. The procedure was well tolerated in 96 % of patients (n = 187). Only 1 % (n = 2) could not tolerate the presence of seton due to significant discomfort. Fistula recurrence rate was 6 % (n = 12).

CONCLUSIONS

Recently, newer treatment modalities have been reported with enthusiasm. However, there remains a lack of strong statistical evidence of efficacy to support their use. Overall, loose seton placement remains a well-tolerated, pragmatic low-cost solution to this common and difficult condition as evident by our study.

Modified plug repair with limited sphincter sparing fistulectomy in the treatment of complex anal fistulas

PURPOSE

New technical approaches involving biologically derived products have been used to treat complex anal fistulas in order to avoid the risk of fecal incontinence. The least invasive methods involve filling out the fistula tract with fibrin glue or introduction of an anal fistula plug into the fistula canal following thorough curettage. A review shows that the new techniques involving biologically derived products do not confer any significant advantages. Therefore, the question inevitably arises as to whether the combination of a partial or limited fistulectomy, i.e., of the extrasphincteric portion of the fistula, and preservation of the sphincter muscle by repairing the section of the complex anal fistula running through the sphincter muscle and filling it with a fistula plug produces better results.

METHODS

A modified plug technique was used, in which the extrasphincteric portion of the complex anal fistula was removed by means of a limited fistulectomy and the remaining section of the fistula in the sphincter muscle was repaired using the fistula plug with fixing button.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients with a complex anal fistula, who had undergone surgery using a modified plug repair with limited fistulectomy of the extrasphincteric part of the fistula and use of the fistula plug with fixing button, there are from 40 patients (follow-up rate: 77%) some kind of follow-up informations, after a mean of 19.32 ± 6.9 months. Thirty-two were men and eight were women, with a mean age of 52.97 ± 12.22 years. Surgery was conducted to treat 36 transsphincteric, 1 intersphincteric, and 3 rectovaginal fistulas. In 36 of 40 patients (90%), the complex anal fistulas or rectovaginal fistulas were completely healed without any sign of recurrence. None of these patients complained about continence problems.

CONCLUSION

A modification of the plug repair of complex anal fistulas with limited fistulectomy of the extrasphincteric part of the fistula and use of the plug with fixing button seems to increase the healing rate in comparison to the standard plug technique.

Anal abscess and fistula

Benign anorectal diseases, such as anal abscesses and fistula, are commonly seen by primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, emergency physicians, general surgeons, and colorectal surgeons. It is important to have a thorough understanding of the complexity of these 2 disease processes so as to provide appropriate and timely treatment. We review the pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options for both anal abscesses and fistulas.