Atraumatic O-ring wound retractor reduces postoperative pain. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:1177-1178. [PMID: 25326110 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1225-x]

Comparison of the Ventral Approach to the Canine Hip Joint Using Gelpi Retractors and an Elastic O-Ring Wound Retractor

This study included 10 fresh adult cadavers of large breed dogs (6 males and 4 females). Their weight ranged from 25 to 45 kg (mean ± SD: 33.9 ± 6.2 kg). The breeds represented were crossbreed dogs (n = 5), German shepherds (n = 2), Bernese mountain dogs (n = 1), American Staffordshire terriers (n = 1), and Gordon setters (n = 1). Access to the target area and identification of the femoral head and neck was achieved with two Gelpi retractors inserted orthogonally and with the O-WR in all procedures. In each dog, the approach to the hip joint was made on the left and right sides. There was no significant difference in the area of the surgical wound bed between the two sides using either the Gelpi retractors (-0.52 ± 1.87 cm2; CI 95%: -1.86, 0.81 cm2; p = 0.398) or the O-WR (-0.27 ± 2.34 cm2; CI 95%: -1.94, 1.41 cm2; p = 0.729). The area of the surgical wound bed was 6.28 ± 1.72 cm2 (2.72-9.70 cm2) for the Gelpi retractors and 6.34 ± 1.81 cm2 (4.13-10.77 cm2) for the O-WR, and the difference between the Gelpi retractors and the O-WR was not significant (-0.06 ± 1.72 cm2; CI 95%: -0.86, 0.74 cm2; p = 0.879).

Opioid-free analgesia: is it achievable in open colorectal surgery without neuraxial block?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate feasibility and results of opioid-free analgesia (OFA) in open colorectal operation, and to determine factors influencing successful OFA.

METHODS

This study included 89 adult patients having elective open colectomy and/or proctectomy (without neuraxial or nerve block) from 2018 to 2020 in a university hospital. Current opioid users were excluded. Non-opioid analgesics were given based on patient's comorbidity. Successful OFA was determined by whether patients required morphine administered by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and compared between OFA group and the other. Factors influencing successful OFA were determined (Trial registration number: TCTR20211220007).

RESULTS

The studied population had an average age of 68±12 years. Colorectal resection with stoma formation was performed in 17 cases (19%). OFA was achieved in 15 cases (17%). Median amount of morphine used was 18 mg per person (interquartile range 10-30) in those requiring opioid. There was no significant difference in patient's characteristics, intraoperative parameters and clinical outcomes between OFA group and the other except lower pain scores in the OFA group. The regimen of perioperative analgesia was the only predictor of successful OFA. Patients receiving multimodal analgesia with acetaminophen, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and nefopam had the highest chance of successful OFA (5 of 15 cases, 33%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that OFA was achievable in 17% of patients undergoing open colorectal resection without neuraxial block. The regimen of perioperative analgesia was the predictor of successful OFA.

Mini-invasive approach for removal of iliopsoas migrating grass awns with an atraumatic wound retractor

This case series describes a novel mini coeliotomy approach using a radial, atraumatic self-retaining retractor for the retrieval of migrant plant foreign bodies from the iliopsoas muscles of six male dogs under intra-operative ultrasonographic guidance. Four dogs had a history of pulmonary disease potentially compatible with inhalation of a foreign body approximately 2-4 months before presentation. Under ultrasonographic guidance, the grass awns were identified in the iliopsoas muscle and were completely removed. In this case series, the annular ring device provided an excellent view of the surgical field for intra-abdominal manipulations. Patient follow-up at 15 days and 6 to 12 months after surgery indicated a full recovery, and no grass awn fragment residues were identified.

Advantages of wound retractor device versus rigid trocar at camera port in video-assisted thoracic surgery-a single institution experience

Background

rigid trocars are widely adopted in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), despite some disadvantages: (I) cannula strong pressure on intercostal nerve stimulating postoperative pain; (II) limited movement of thoracoscopic devices on their fulcrum when extreme acute angles with the chest wall are needed. Wound retractor (WR) device, designed for laparoscopic surgery, it is also used in VATS, but to protect mini-thoracotomy. We compared the use of extra-small WR versus rigid trocar at camera port that is the most painful thoracostomy. The aim was to determine if WR is associated with less postoperative pain and better scope maneuverability.

Methods

This is a single institution prospective study recorded and approved by ethics committee at our hospital. From October 2016 to June 2017, we enrolled 40 patients (statistical power 88%), randomized into two different groups. Group A (20 patients) underwent VATS lung resection using WR at camera port, group B (20 patients) using rigid trocar. Intra-operative data collected were maximum acute angle obtained between the camera and chest wall and chest wall thickness. Pain was measured by numerical analog scales (NAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after surgery. We also measured total morphine consumption at 72 h administered by patient controlled analgesia (PCA) system.

Results

No statistical significance was found in the demographic traits of the two groups (P=1). Statistically significant differences were found in favor of group A for both pain control, morphine consumption (P<0.001) and camera maneuverability (described as maximum acute angle obtained/chest wall thickness) (P<0.001).

Conclusions

patients who had WR showed less postoperative pain. Moreover, WR presented other advantages: camera protection by small bleeding from chest wall, adaptability with every chest wall thickness, absence of skin injury around the port. We suggest its use instead of rigid trocar.

Opioid-sparing effect of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on surgical outcomes after open colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

AIM: To evaluate the opioid-sparing effect of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors on short-term surgical outcomes after open colorectal surgery.

METHODS: Patients undergoing open colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed. Patients with combined general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia, and those with acute colonic obstruction or perforation were excluded. Patients receiving selective COX-2 inhibitor were compared with well-matched individuals without such a drug. Outcome measures included numeric pain score and morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption on postoperative day (POD) 1-3, gastrointestinal recovery (time to tolerate solid diet and time to defecate), complications and length of postoperative stay.

RESULTS: There were 75 patients in each group. Pain score on POD 1-3 was not significantly different between two groups. However, MME consumption and MME consumption per kilogram body weight on POD 1-3 was significantly less in patients receiving a selective COX-2 inhibitor (P < 0.001). Median MME consumption per kilogram body weight on POD 1-3 was 0.09, 0.06 and nil, respectively in patients receiving a selective COX-2 inhibitor and 0.22, 0.25 and 0.07, respectively in the comparative group (P < 0.001), representing at least 59% opioid reduction. Patients prescribing a selective COX-2 inhibitor had a shorter median time to resumption of solid diet [1 (IQR 1-2) d vs 2 (IQR 2-3) d; P < 0.001] and time to first defecation [2 (IQR 2-3) d vs 3 (IQR 3-4) d; P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in overall postoperative complications between two groups. However, median postoperative stay was significantly 1-d shorter in patients prescribing a selective COX-2 inhibitor [4 (IQR 3-5) d vs 5 (IQR 4-6) d; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION: Perioperative administration of oral selective COX-2 inhibitors significantly decreased intravenous opioid consumption, shortened time to gastrointestinal recovery and reduced hospital stay after open colorectal surgery.