The optimal indication for FiLaC® is high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective cohort of 69 consecutive patients

Failure rates and complications of four sphincter-sparing techniques for the treatment of fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several techniques are available to reduce the risk of sphincter injury when treating anal fistula, such as ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT), fistula laser closure (FiLaC) and endoanal flap (EAF). The aim of this meta-analysis is to provide data on the safety, complications and failure of these techniques.

METHODS

Studies published after 2017, with patients undergoing at least one among LIFT, VAAFT, FiLaC and EAF for perianal fistula and providing data regarding failure, were retrieved from PubMed and EMBASE. Primary outcome was failure; other outcomes included continence disturbance and complications.

RESULTS

Forty-nine articles with 3520 patients were included. The failure rates were 28.6% (range 3.8-75) for LIFT, 22.3% (6.2-65.2) for VAAFT, 43.9% (11.1-80) for FiLaC and 25.9% (4.7-100) for EAF, with a mean follow-up of 35.4 (6-80.4), 32.4 (6-48), 31.6(6.3-60) and 42.4 (12-155) months. The available network meta-analysis on failure showed RD of -0.08 (95% CI - 0.58 to 0.42) comparing LIFT vs VAAFT and 0.30 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.58) comparing LIFT vs EAF. No patients undergoing VAAFT or FiLaC reported worsening continence, while for LIFT and EAF, the continence disturbance rate was 1.5% and 7.3%, respectively. No major complications were observed. The most common minor complications were pain (1.4%), bleeding (1.1%) and wound infection (1.2%). Overall, minor complication rates were 4.3% for LIFT, 7.2% for VAAFT, 10.2% for FiLaC and 6.2% for EAF. Crohn's disease was associated with a higher failure rate (39.5% vs 31.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

FiLaC, VAAFT, LIFT and EAF may represent a valid option in the treatment of anal fistula. VAAFT showed the lowest rate of failure but with no differences from network metanalysis. Wider homogeneous studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to obtain more robust data.

PROSPERO NUMBER

CRD42022375600.

Total fistula volume predicts surgical outcomes in complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease following fistula-tract laser closure: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to identify risk factors influencing long-term treatment outcomes in patients with complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD) following fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaC™).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients with complex pfCD who underwent FiLaC™ from January 2019 to December 2020, including demographics, pharmacological regimens, and preoperative MRI assessments. Follow-up monitored fistula outcomes such as healing, remission, failure, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 49 patients followed for an average of 60.0 months, 31 (63.3%) achieved fistula healing, 3 (6.1%) showed improvement, 3 (6.1%) had non-healing, and 12 (24.5%) experienced recurrence. Significant differences were found between healed and unhealed groups in total fistula volume (TFV), number of fistula tracts, and perianal Crohn's disease activity index (PDAI) (P = 0.036, P = 0.020, and P = 0.041, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis indicated TFV as a significant predictor of healing outcomes (P = 0.013). ROC analysis confirmed its predictive value for fistula healing in complex pfCD, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.729 (P = 0.008). The optimal threshold for TFV was 4.81 cm3, with a sensitivity of 61.1% and a specificity of 83.9%. The AUC for recurrence rates was 0.883 (P < 0.001), with sensitivity and specificity at 83.3% and 83.8%, respectively, using the same threshold for TFV. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve highlighted the predictive potential of TFV for fistula recurrence (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

TFV is an effective predictor of long-term outcomes in patients with complex pfCD following FiLaC™.

Radially Emitting Diode Laser Closure of Transsphincteric Fistula-in-Ano

BACKGROUND

There has been a shift in the treatment of fistula-in-ano toward a focus on the preservation of continence while simultaneously eradicating the disease. The utilization of radially emitting diode laser catheters to ablate fistula tracks has been described since 2011, with heterogenous studies publishing success rates ranging from 20% to 89%.

OBJECTIVE

Present the authors' experience managing solitary transsphincteric fistulas of cryptoglandular origin with a radially emitting diode laser.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized single center trial with 12-month follow-up.

SETTINGS

Quaternary referral academic health care center.

PATIENTS

Forty-six adults with transsphincteric fistula-in-ano.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent radially emitting diode laser closure of fistula-in-ano.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical healing and fistula recurrence.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 26-85) underwent diode laser closure. Most were men (n = 28; 60%). Twenty-four patients (52%) had previous fistula repairs with a median of 1.5 (range, 1-7) repairs per patient. All were followed for 12 months. Successful closure after 1 laser treatment occurred in 43% of patients. Thirteen of 26 failure cases (50%) were able to undergo a delayed fistulotomy secondary to an anatomic change with the fistula becoming more superficial, moving out of the internal sphincter muscle after laser ablation, all of which healed. No patients experienced new or worsening (preexisting) fecal incontinence. Two patients (8%) continued treatment for abscesses/fistula branching. One patient (3%) experienced migration of the fistula from the base of the left labia to the introitus of the vagina and 1 experienced recurrence and worsening of their disease process with subsequent involvement of the coccyx (previous deep postanal space abscess).

LIMITATIONS

Limitations to our study include its nonrandomized prospective nature, single center and surgeon experience, and small patient sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Radially emitting diode laser closure is a continence-preserving option to consider when treating transsphincteric fistula-in-ano. When the procedure fails, it does not fail poorly (open wounds, retracted flaps, incontinence, etc) and can be repeated. Complications can include abscess formation and fistula migration to adjacent anatomic locations (vagina). Even if unsuccessful, after treatment, the fistula can anatomically migrate distally, becoming more superficial and thus providing the opportunity to proceed with a delayed fistulotomy. See Video Abstract .

CIERRE DE FSTULA ANAL TRANSESFINTRICA CON LSER DE DIODO DE EMISIN RADIAL

ANTECEDENTES:Ha habido un cambio en el tratamiento de la fístula anal hacia un enfoque en la preservación de la continencia y al mismo tiempo en la erradicación de la enfermedad. La utilización de catéteres láser de diodo de emisión radial para extirpar los trayectos de las fístulas se describe desde el 2011 y estudios heterogéneos publican tasas de éxito que oscilan entre el 20 y el 89%.OBJETIVO:Presentar nuestra experiencia en el manejo de fístulas transesfinterianas solitarias de origen criptoglandular con láser de diodo de emisión radial.DISEÑO:Ensayo prospectivo, no aleatorizado, unicéntrico, con seguimiento de 12 meses.LUGARES:Centro de salud académico de referencia Cuaternario.PACIENTES:Cuarenta y seis adultos con fístula anal transesfintérica.INTERVENCIONES:Todos se sometieron a cierre de fístula anal con láser de diodo de emisión radial.MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DEL RESULTADO:Curación clínica y recurrencia de la fístula.RESULTADOS:Cuarenta y seis pacientes con una mediana de edad de 48 años (rango, 26-85) se sometieron a cierre con láser de diodo. La mayoría eran hombres (n=28/60%). Veinticuatro (52%) habían tenido reparaciones previas de fístulas con una mediana de 1,5 (rango, 1-7) reparaciones por paciente. Todos fueron seguidos durante 12 meses. El cierre exitoso después de un tratamiento con láser se produjo en el 43%. Trece de 26 fracasos (50%) pudieron someterse a una fistulotomía tardía debido a un cambio anatómico en el que la fístula se volvió más superficial y salió del músculo del esfínter interno después de la ablación con láser, y todas sanaron. Ningún paciente experimentó incontinencia fecal nueva o que empeoró (preexistente). Dos (8%) continuaron tratamiento por abscesos/ramificación de fístulas. Una (3%) experimentó migración de la fístula desde la base de los labios izquierdos hasta el introito de la vagina y 1 experimentó recurrencia y empeoramiento de su proceso patológico con posterior afectación del cóccix (absceso previo en el espacio postanal profundo).LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de nuestro estudio incluyen su naturaleza prospectiva no aleatoria, la experiencia de un solo centro y del cirujano y el tamaño pequeño de la muestra de pacientes.CONCLUSIONES:El cierre con láser de diodo de emisión radial es una opción para preservar la continencia a considerar cuando se trata la fístula en el ano transesfintérica. Cuando el procedimiento fracasa, no fracasa mal (heridas abiertas, colgajos retraídos, incontinencia, etc.), y puede repetirse. Las complicaciones pueden incluir formación de abscesos y migración de fístulas a ubicaciones anatómicas adyacentes (vagina). Incluso si no tiene éxito, después del tratamiento la fístula puede migrar anatómicamente distal volviéndose más superficial y brindando así la oportunidad de proceder con una fistulotomía retrasada. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Long-term outcomes of fistula-tract laser closure for complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaC™) has shown promising outcomes in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD). However, most studies assessed a mixed cohort encompassing pfCD and cryptoglandular fistulas during a short follow-up period. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term treatment outcomes of FiLaC™ in patients with complex pfCD.

METHODS

Data from patients with complex pfCD who underwent FiLaC™ during deep remission of Crohn's disease between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, surgery history, and medication strategy were registered before surgery. Follow-ups were scheduled at 1, 2, and 3 months after FiLaC™, and at 2-month intervals thereafter. The primary endpoint was clinic healing, while clinic remission/unhealed/recurrence were classified as unhealed. Additionally, adverse events and Wexner fecal incontinence score were documented.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (40 men and 9 women) with a median age of 26.0 (19.0-35.5) years were included with a median follow-up of 50.0 (39.5-54.0) months. Of these, 31 (63.3%) patients achieved fistula healing, 3 (6.1%) experienced improvement, 3 (6.1%) remained unhealed, and 12 (24.5%) experienced recurrence. Montreal A category was lower in the healed group (P < 0.001). No major complications, such as bleeding or fecal or urinary incontinence, were observed, and pain was transient. The Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly at the last available follow-up, indicating an intact postoperative continence function (P = 0.014). PCDAI scores were significantly higher in the unhealed group (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

FiLaC™ is an efficient and safe sphincter-saving procedure for patients with complex pfCD.

European Society of Coloproctology: Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistula

AIM

The primary aim of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Guideline Development Group (GDG) was to produce high-quality, evidence-based guidelines for the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula with input from a multidisciplinary group and using transparent, reproducible methodology.

METHODS

Previously published methodology in guideline development by the ESCP has been replicated in this project. The guideline development process followed the requirements of the AGREE-S tool kit. Six phases can be identified in the methodology. Phase one sets the scope of the guideline, which addresses the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula in adult patients presenting to secondary care. The target population for this guideline are healthcare practitioners in secondary care and patients interested in understanding the clinical evidence available for various surgical interventions for anal fistula. Phase two involved formulation of the GDG. The GDG consisted of 21 coloproctologists, three research fellows, a radiologist and a methodologist. Stakeholders were chosen for their clinical and academic involvement in the management of anal fistula as well as being representative of the geographical variation among the ESCP membership. Five patients were recruited from patient groups to review the draft guideline. These patients attended two virtual meetings to discuss the evidence and suggest amendments. In phase three, patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes questions were formulated by the GDG. The GDG ratified 250 questions and chose 45 for inclusion in the guideline. In phase four, critical and important outcomes were confirmed for inclusion. Important outcomes were pain and wound healing. Critical outcomes were fistula healing, fistula recurrence and incontinence. These outcomes formed part of the inclusion criteria for the literature search. In phase five, a literature search was performed of MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews by eight teams of the GDG. Data were extracted and submitted for review by the GDG in a draft guideline. The most recent systematic reviews were prioritized for inclusion. Studies published since the most recent systematic review were included in our analysis by conducting a new meta-analysis using Review manager. In phase six, recommendations were formulated, using grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations, in three virtual meetings of the GDG.

RESULTS

In seven sections covering the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula, there are 42 recommendations.

CONCLUSION

This is an up-to-date international guideline on the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula using methodology prescribed by the AGREE enterprise.

Laser technology in proctological diseases: is it really the wave of the future?

Different types of lasers have been applied for various proctological conditions. We discuss about published articles regarding the application of lasers, with concern about evidence-based use of these techniques and technologies. We performed a literature search about laser treatments for proctological conditions. 55 studies were included for the final revision. Meta-analysis of data was not performed because of heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. A scoping review was performed. Laser treatments for hemorrhoids require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy, but are more expensive. Studies are heterogeneous in design, endpoints, postoperative assessment, length of follow-up and outcome measures. Only 3 RCTs are available and only three studies evaluate long-term outcomes. FiLaC (fistula laser closure) was initially described in 2011 for the treatment of anal fistula. In the published studies the reported healing rates vary between 20 and 82%, and the ideal indication is yet to be defined. Studies with long-term follow-up are lacking. SiLaT (sinus laser treatment) applied the technology used for FiLaC to the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. This technique had less perioperative pain and shorter hospital stay, but a lower primary healing rate when compared to traditional techniques. Available data is very limited, and no randomized trials are published to date. Laser assisted techniques are a viable, minimally invasive, but expensive option for the treatment of several proctological conditions. Further researches are needed to assess if patients could benefit of their use, and for what indication.

Closure of Fistula-in-Ano Using a Radial-Emitting Laser Probe: Initial Experience in Lagos, Nigeria

Background

Fistula-in-ano treatment has remained quite challenging with high failure rates and a potential for damage to the anal sphincteric complex leading to flatal or faecal incontinence. The treatment of fistula-in-ano using the fistula laser closure (FiLaC) as a minimally invasive, sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease has recently been documented.

Objectives

This review aimed to report the outcome of using it at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital.

Patients and Methods

The procedures were performed with a radially emitting laser fibre from Biolitec AG-CeramOptec (Bonn, Germany). The duration of symptoms, type of fistula, duration of the procedures, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results

Eleven male patients had laser fistula-in-ano closure. The age range was 33-51 years, with a median age of 39 years and an interquartile range (IQR) of 37-47 years. Five patients were noted to have high fistula/e, whereas six had low fistula/e, seven had a single tract each, and three had three tracts each. The duration of surgery ranged, approximately from 3 to 60 min, with a median of 19 min and IQR of 9-33 min. Postoperative pain was mild in all patients and were all discharged as day case. There was no postoperative wound infection, anal incontinence, anal stenosis, and subcutaneous abscess. However, there was a recurrence in two patients.

Conclusions

FiLaC has been demonstrated to be a reliable and safe sphincter-saving procedure for treating fistula-in-ano even for complex and high fistulae that is feasible in our subregion.

Prospective and multicentre study of radiofrequency treatment in anal fistula

BACKGROUND

The most effective treatment for anal fistula is fistulotomy, but it involves a risk of anal incontinence. To reduce this morbidity, sphincter-sparing treatments have been developed, but their success in real life is often less than 50%. The aim is to determine the clinical healing rate 6 months after radiofrequency treatment.

METHODS

We planned to evaluate 50 patients from three French proctology centres. Treatment efficacy was evaluated at 6 and 12 months by means of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging examination. We evaluated morbidity and healing prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with a mean age of 51 years (22-82) were included. Eleven patients had a low trans-sphincteric fistula (LTS), 21 patients had a high trans-sphincteric fistula (HTS), eight had a complex fistula and nine had Crohn's disease fistula. After 6 months, 17 patients (34.7%) had a clinically healed fistula, including five (45.5%) with LTS fistula, seven (33.3%) with HTS fistula, one (12.5%) with complex fistula, four (44.4%) with Crohn's disease, with no significant difference between these fistula types (p: 0.142). At 12 months, the healing rate was identical. MRI in 15 out of 17 clinically healed patients showed a deep remission of 73.3% at 12 months. Energy power was associated with the success of the treatment. There was an 8.2% incidence of post-surgical complications with 4.1% being abscesses (one required surgical management). Postoperative pain was minor. No new cases or deterioration of continence have been shown.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency is effective in 34.7% of the cases as an anal fistula treatment in this first prospective study, with low morbidity and no effect on continence. Clinical healing was deep (MRI) in three-quarters at 1 year. The increase in energy power during the procedure seems to be a key point to be analysed to optimise results.

Comprehensive literature review of the applications of surgical laser in benign anal conditions

Surgery for benign anal conditions is a common practice and is usually followed by a good outcome. The present review aimed to summarize the emergence and evolution of different laser techniques used for the treatment of benign anal conditions and report their current outcome. PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies that assessed the use of laser in benign anal conditions. Anal conditions reviewed were hemorrhoids, anal fistula, anal warts, anal stenosis, and anal fissure. The full text of the studies retrieved was summarized in a narrative and tabular form. Laser techniques used for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease were laser open hemorrhoidectomy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, and Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal laser dearterialization. Resolution of hemorrhoidal symptoms was reported in 72-100% of patients after laser treatment. YAG laser, fistula laser closure, and photodynamic therapy have been used for the treatment of anal fistula with success rates ranging from 20 to 92.6%. Anal warts can be treated with photodynamic therapy with or without YAG or CO2 laser with a success rate up to 88%. A few studies reported the use of laser in the treatment of chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis. The use of laser in the treatment of benign anal conditions is associated with promising outcomes. Laser was most assessed in hemorrhoidal disease and anal fistula and showed more consistent success rates with hemorrhoidal disease than with anal fistula. Preliminary reports assessed the outcome of laser treatment in other conditions as anal fissure and warts with acceptable outcomes.

Laser ablation of anal fistulae: a 6-year experience in a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the role of laser ablation of anal fistulae in the European setting. However, long-term follow-up results following laser fistula ablations are not widely investigated and no study was performed in the Asia-Pacific, a region with a distinctive prevalence of tuberculosis. The primary objective of this study is to report a single-centre experience with laser ablation of anal fistulae in Malaysia over a period of 6 years.

METHOD

This was a retrospective observational study assessing the outcomes following 70 laser ablations of anal fistulae from February 2014 till December 2019. All cases were assessed using endoanal ultrasound. The laser ablation procedures were performed using laser systems and fibres from Endoteq Medizinische Laser GmBH, Germany, and Biolitec AG, Jena, Germany. Laser fibres were introduced into the fistula tract and laser energy was emitted radially in continuous mode when activated during the procedure. Pre-defined post-procedural outcomes (primary healing, healing failure or recurrence) were recorded as either present or absent during subsequent follow-up appointments and the data was analysed.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up period of 10 months, primary healing was reported following 42 procedures (60.0%). Healing failure was reported following 28 procedures (40.0%) whilst recurrence was seen after 16 procedures (22.86%). No new cases of incontinence were reported following the procedure.

CONCLUSION

The reported primary healing rate following laser ablation of anal fistulae in this study appears consistent with existing literature published by other international centres. The most apparent clinical advantage of this procedure is sphincter-function preservation. However, the primary healing rate after isolated laser fistula ablation is still suboptimal. Judicious patient selection and application in anal fistulae with suitable characteristics could potentially improve the post-procedural outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of FiLaC™ for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD) present with complex types of perianal fistulas and need repetitive repair operations, resulting in a high risk of sphincter injury. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a novel sphincter-saving technique that obliterates the fistula tract with a photothermal effect. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FiLaC in pfCD.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Wanfang Data were searched for published articles from January 2000 to June 2021. The clinicaltrials.gov website was searched for completed or ongoing trials on pfCD and FiLaC™. The references of each article were also searched for eligible data. The main outcome was the primary healing rate of the FiLaC™ procedure. Additionally, fecal incontinence was analyzed as the secondary outcome to evaluate the safety of FiLaC™.

RESULTS

Six studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. All studies were published within the past 6 years and came from European countries. There were 50 pfCD patients recruited, and 31 patients' fistulas were healed after FiLaC™. The pooled primary healing rate was 68% (95% CI 53.0-84.0%, I² = 27%, p = 0.23). There was no major fecal incontinence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that FiLaC™ may be an effective and safe procedure for pfCD patients. However, the evidence is poor and there is a need for more high-quality prospective controlled studies with long-term follow-up before this minimally invasive technique is recommended for surgical treatment of pfCD.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anorectal fistulas in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) has gained increasing acceptance as a sphincter-sparing procedure for treating complex anorectal fistulas (CAF), but no unequivocal conclusions can yet be drawn regarding its ultimate effectiveness. We reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VAAFT in CAF patients.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021279085). A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021 with no restriction on language based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We used the keywords video-assisted surgery, video-assisted anal fistula treatment, and complex anorectal fistula to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials (7 prospective and 7 retrospective) with a total of 1201 patients (mean age 43.5 years) were included. The median follow-up duration was 16.5(8-48) months. Pooled analysis showed that the rates of success, recurrence and postoperative complication across the studies were 83% (95% CI 81-85%, I² = 37.9%), 16% (95% CI 14-18%, I² = 4.8%), 11% (95% CI 7-15%, I² = 72.1%), respectively. The postoperative Jorge-Wexner score used to assess the level of anal incontinence was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.9-1.27, I² = 74.6%). The internal opening detection rate was 97.6% (95% CI 96.1-99.6%, I² = 48.2%). Recurrence rates varied according to the closure method of internal opening from 21.4% after using staplers, 18.7% after suturing, to 23.5% after advancement flap. The hospital stay was 3.15 days (95% CI 2.96-3.35, I² = 49.7%). Subgroup analysis indicated that the risk of heterogeneity in the urine retention group was higher  compared with that of the overall group and that retrospective studies may be the source of heterogeneity for postoperative anal incontinence. r . Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the pooled results. Begg's and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available evidence, VAAFT may be a valuable alternative to fistulotomy or seton in treating CAF and has the additional long-term benefits of reducing anal incontinence and surgical morbidity, permitting earlier healing and accelerated rehabilitation.

Emerging Data on Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC) for the Treatment of Perianal Fistulas; Patient Selection and Outcomes

Fistula laser closure (FiLaC) is a relatively new sphincter-sparing technique in fistula surgery that was initially reported in 2011. It involves the radial dissipation of laser energy in the fistula tract and, through a combination of coagulation and shrinkage of the tract, is proposed to result in progressive sealing of fistulas. Early studies have suggested minimal impact on continence and touted the advantage of minimal morbidity with potential of repeat procedures if the technique fails initially. Despite early promising results, ten years on, questions remain on the technique, patient selection and long-term outcomes. This narrative review assesses the evidence reported to-date of radially emitting laser fistula surgery in the treatment of perianal fistulas.

Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC™) for fistula-in-ano-yet another technique with 50% healing rates?

PURPOSE

Treatment of ano-cutaneous fistulas remains a therapeutic challenge. Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a relatively new technique for the treatment of ano-cutaneous fistulas. This study aimed to determine the success rate of fistula closure using FiLaC™. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and patient characteristics associated with treatment success.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients subjected to FiLaC™ at Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, between March 2017 and July 2019. All patients had a one-track fistula not suitable for fistulotomy. All were treated with a draining seton for at least 8 weeks prior to laser closure. Fistulas were ablated with a 360-degree emitting 12-watt 1470 nm laser probe. The inner fistula opening was closed with absorbable suture. All patients were followed with clinical examination including MRI or EAUS 1 year after the procedure.

RESULTS

In total, 66 patients with 68 fistulas were included. Two patients had a high intersphincteric, 20 had low transsphincteric, 41 high transsphincteric and 5 had suprasphincteric fistulas. Fistula aetiology was cryptoglandular in 83.8%, whereas the rest were due to Crohn's disease. Thirty-one (45.6%) were subjected to a second FiLaC™ procedure. Follow-up was median 19 months (12-26 months). Ultimately, 30 of 68 (44.1%) of the fistulas healed. No cases of incontinence following FiLaC™ were observed, but a single patient developed an abscess.

CONCLUSION

Fistula closure with FiLaC™ had success rates comparable to that of other sphincter-sparing techniques. The technique seems safe with respect to adverse events and risk of incontinence.

Treatment of anal fistula with FiLaC®: results of a 10-year experience with 175 patients

BACKGROUND

Treatment of fistula-in-ano with fistula laser closure (FiLaC^®) is a sphincter-saving procedure indicated for patients with complex anal fistulas. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical results of a 10-year experience with FiLaC^®.

METHODS

Data from patients with cryptoglandular anal fistula who underwent laser closure with FiLaC^® in June 2009-May 2019 were evaluated. The primary study endpoint was healing rate. Secondary endpoints were evaluation of morbidity and assessment of possible predictive factors of failure.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 180 patients, 5 had been lost to follow-up. 175 patients [m:f: 115:60; median age 49 years (range18-81 years)] with cryptoglandular fistulas treated with FiLaC^® were included in the study. Fistulas were transphincteric in 152 (86.8%) cases, intersphincteric in 18 (10.3%), and suprasphincteric in 5 (2.9%). A seton or draining silicon loop was placed in 142 (81.8%) patients at a median of 14 weeks (range10-28 weeks) prior to FiLaC^®. At median follow-up of 60 months (range 9-120 months), the overall primary healing rate was 66.8% (117/175). Thirty-eight patients (21.7%) failed to heal. Twenty out of 175 (11.4%) patients had recurrence at median follow-up of 18 months (range 9-50 months). Patients in whom a seton/loop was inserted for drainage at the first-stage procedure had a statistically significant higher rate of success (100/142, 70.4% vs. 17/33, 51.5%, respectively; p 0.0377; odds ratio 0.45). Forty-eight patients were reoperated on at a median of 15 months (range 12-20 months) after laser treatment. Twenty-six underwent redo laser closure with FiLaC^®, and 12 of them healed (46%), for a secondary success rate of 73.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer follow-up confirms the efficacy of FiLaC^® in the treatment of complex anal fistulas. Its use and implementation should be encouraged.

Retrospective Analysis of Primary Suturing of the Internal Orifice of Perianal Fistula During FiLaC Procedure

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the results of the fistula-tract laser closure associated with primary closure of internal orifice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The surgical objective was to seal the fistula tract using laser energy and closing internal orifice with purse-string suture. Between January 2017 and December 2018, 35 consecutive patients who underwent the laser closure plus internal orifice suturing included. In all 35 patients, the laser procedure was applied then internal orifice was primarily closed with 2-0 polyglactin suture after the debridement of necrotic tissue.

RESULTS

Among 35 patients (11 female, 24 male), mean age was 43.9±12.9 years. Median follow-up was 11 months (6.0 to 17.6 mo). According to the Park classification; 21 patients (60%) had intersphincteric fistula, 12 (34%) had transsphincteric fistula, 2 (6%) had suprasphincteric or extrasphincteric fistula. There were low/simple and high/complex fistula in 21 (60%) and 14 patients (40%), respectively. Overall, 15/35 (42.9%) patients showed complete healing, 12/35 (34%) had slight drainage with minimal symptoms, 8/35 (22%) patients had persistent symptomatic drainage, and there was no patient with painful symptomatic drainage. On the basis of the Jorge-Wexner continence score, there was no significant difference in patients before and after the procedure. The perfect continence rate was achieved in 32 patients (91%).

CONCLUSION

Although the absence of major and minor complications after Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC) procedure seemed to be a major advantage, we thought that closure of the internal opening by primary suturing has no positive effect on the healing of the perianal fistula.

Could FiLaC™ be effective in the treatment of anal fistulas? A systematic review of observational studies and proportional meta-analysis

AIM

Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC™) is a novel sphincter-preserving technique that is based on new technologies and shows promising results in repairing anal fistulas whilst maintaining external sphincter function. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to present the efficacy and the safety of FiLaC™ in the management of anal fistula disease.

METHOD

The present proportional meta-analysis was designed using the PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases from inception until November 2019.

RESULTS

Overall, eight studies were included that recruited 476 patients. The pooled success rate of the technique was 63% (95% CI 50%-75%). The pooled complication rate was 8% (95% CI 1%-18%). Sixty-six per cent of patients had a transsphincteric fistula and 60% had undergone a previous surgical intervention, mainly the insertion of a seton (54%). The majority had a cryptoglandular fistula. Operation time and follow-up period were described for each study.

CONCLUSION

FiLaC™ seems to be an efficient therapeutic option for perianal fistula disease with an adequate level of safety that preserves quality of life. Nevertheless, randomized trials need to be designed to compare FiLaC™ with other procedures for the management of anal fistulas such as ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, anal advancement flaps, fibrin glue, collagen paste, autologous adipose tissue, fistula plug and video-assisted anal fistula treatment.

Sphincter-saving therapy for fistula-in-ano: long-term follow-up after FiLaC®

BACKGROUND

The treatment of anal fistula remains a challenge between maintaining continence and radical surgery to prevent recurrence. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC^®) is a sphincter-saving technique using a radial emitting laser fibre to close the fistula tract. The aim of this study was to report long-term outcomes in patients who received FiLaC^® therapy for transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistula between January 2011 and December 2017.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on patients who were treated with FiLaC^®- for a transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistula at our institution between January 2011 and December 2017. In all patients, the FiLaC^® procedure was combined with a closure of the internal orifice using a simple 3-0 Z stitch. Patient characteristics, previous proctological history, healing rates, failures and postoperative continence were investigated.

RESULTS

The study included 83 patients [mean age 50.01 ± 14.59 years. 64 (77.1%) males] with a mean follow-up period of 41.99 (± 21.59) months (range 4-87 months). Thirteen patients (15.7%) had a recurrent fistula. 65 patients (78.3%) had undergone prior abscess drainage with insertion of a seton. The primary healing rate was 74.7% (62 of 83 patients) overall. Eleven (13.3%) of the 21 patients (25.3%) who failed FiLaC^®-therapy underwent a second operation. In eight cases, Re-FiLaC^® and in three cases, fistulectomy with closure of the internal orifice was performed. Afterwards 6 (54.5%) of these 11 patients could be considered cured: 3 who had fistulectomy and three who had Re-FiLaC^® treatment. The overall healing rate after second FiLaC^® was 78.3% (65 of 83 patients) while the overall healing rate for FiLaC^® therapy combined with any second procedure was 81.9% (68 of 83 patients). The follow-up period in this group of 11 patients who received re-operation was 38 months (range 13-84 months). Changes in continence occurred in eight patients (9.6%). No patient reported major incontinence postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The FiLaC^® procedure is associated with good healing rates in long-term follow-up and should be considered as a treatment option for transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulae, especially due to the low complication rate and low risk of sphincter injury.

FiLaC® and Crohn's disease perianal fistulas: a pilot study of 20 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of FiLaC^®  (Fistula Laser Closure) in the treatment of perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

All adult patients treated in our department between March 3rd 2016 and November 16th 2018 were included in the study. The fistula was considered healed when the internal and external openings were closed and the patient experienced no pain or leakage (spontaneously or under pressure).

RESULTS

We included 20 consecutive patients (10 women) with a mean age of 32 years ± 9.61. The main fistula tracks were intersphincteric (n = 1, 5%), low (n = 3, 15%) or high (n = 14, 70%) transsphincteric, suprasphincteric (n = 1, 5%), or extrasphincteric (n = 1, 5%). Secondary extension (intramural, supralevator, or horseshoe) was found in 6 cases (30%). The average number of previous surgeries was 2.45 ± 1.47. Crohn's disease extension was ileal in 2 patients (10%), ileocolonic in 8 patients (40%), and colonic in 10 patients (50%). Two patients were lost to follow up and were considered as failures. After a median follow-up period of 7.1 months (range 2-22.5 months), fistula healing was observed in 11 patients (55%). On univariate analysis, only the disease-modifying therapy for Crohn's disease was a predictive factor of a response to FiLaC^® (p = 0.05). The specific analysis of this subgroup showed that FiLaC^® was less effective when patients were treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alone with an OR of 13.06 [1.28; 236.66] (p = 0.02). For combination therapy, the results seemed better (5 of 6 healed versus 2 of 9 healed with anti-TNF alone), but the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that FiLaC^® may play an important role in the management of perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease.