Therapeutic efficacy of rituximab for the management of adult-onset steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective study

Immunosuppression for adult steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

There is limited evidence on which immunosuppressive agents produce the best outcomes for adult patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDNS/FRNS). This review compares the remission rate and adverse effects of various immunosuppressants used.

METHODS

Studies of adult patients with biopsy-proven SDNS/FRNS, administered any immunosuppressive agents and reported complete remission results as one of the clinical outcomes were included. Articles were independently screened by two researchers. ROBINS-I was used for risk of bias assessment. Random-effects model was used for statistical analysis and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

574 patients across 28 studies were included in the analysis. Patients receiving rituximab have a complete remission rate of 89% (95% CI = 83% to 94%; τ2 = 0.0070; I2 = 62%; overall p < 0.01, low certainty) and adverse event rate of 0.26, cyclosporine (CR 40%; 95% CI = 21% to 59%; τ2 = 0.0205; I2 = 55%; overall p = 0.08, low certainty), tacrolimus (CR 84%; 95% CI = 70% to 98%; τ2 = 0.0060; I2 = 33%; overall p = 0.21, moderate certainty), mycophenolate mofetil (CR 82%; 95% CI = 74% to 90%; τ2 < 0.0001; I2 = 15%; overall p = 0.32, moderate certainty) and cyclophosphamide (CR 79%; 95% CI = 69% to 89%; τ2 = 0; I2 = 0%; overall p = 0.52, moderate certainty).

CONCLUSION

Among the commonly used immunosuppressive agents, only rituximab has a statistically significant effect in achieving complete remission among patients with SDNS/FRNS and has a relatively good safety profile, but this is limited by low quality of evidence with high degree of heterogeneity causing a lack of statistical power.

Histological transition from minimal change disease to THSD7A-associated membranous nephropathy in a patient receiving long-term steroid treatment: A case report

RATIONALE

A predominant Th2 immune response is suggested in the pathogenesis of both minimal change disease (MCD) and membranous nephropathy (MN); however, consecutive development of the 2 diseases in a patient is extremely rare.

PATIENT CONCERN

A Japanese man, who developed nephrotic syndrome in his 50s and was diagnosed with MCD by renal biopsy, experienced a relapse of proteinuria approximately 3 years later during long-term steroid treatment. Since the proteinuria was resistant to increase in steroid dosage, repeat renal biopsy was performed, which revealed a small amount of glomerular subepithelial immune deposits containing immunoglobulin (Ig)G (dominantly IgG4). Immunostaining for thrombospondin-type-1-domain-containing-7A (THSD7A) was positive on the glomerular capillary walls, whereas that for other causative antigens of MN, such as phospholipase A2 receptor or neural epidermal growth factor-like 1 protein, was negative. Detailed examination found no associated condition, including malignancies and allergic diseases.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis of THSD7A-associated idiopathic MN was made.

INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES

He received further increased dose of steroids. Thereafter he maintained clinical improvement because his urinary protein level was decreased.

LESSONS

The present case suggested that histological transition from MCD to MN is possible and repeat biopsy would be crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Review of the Role of Rituximab in the Management of Adult Minimal Change Disease and Immune-Mediated Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Background

Minimal change disease and primary FSGS are podocytopathies but are also immune-mediated diseases. Rituximab acts via multiple mechanisms by tilting the balance between autoreactive B and T cells in favor of regulatory B and T cells. The consequences are decreased production of cytokines, chemokines, and permeability factors by these cells. In the past decade, we have seen the discovery of autoantibodies mediating nephrotic syndrome (anti-annexin A2 antibody, anti-UCHL1 antibody, and anti-nephrin antibody), and rituximab decreases their production. Rituximab also binds to podocyte SMPDL3b and has direct podocyte actions.

Summary

Rituximab's role in managing these primary podocytopathies has been discussed in this brief review. Rituximab has been used extensively in children and adults with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. However, rituximab is not very promising in adult steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Although ofatumumab would cause prolonged B-cell depletion and is fully humanized, it is unclear if it is superior to rituximab in preventing relapse of nephrotic syndrome.

Key Messages

Rituximab therapy can induce prolonged remission in adults with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. However, no good data exist on using rituximab in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

Rituximab Therapy for Adults with Nephrotic Syndromes: Standard Schedules or B Cell-Targeted Therapy?

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. It acts mainly through complement-dependent cytotoxicity on B cells expressing the CD20 marker. In this review, we analyse the efficacy and possible pitfalls of rituximab to treat nephrotic syndromes by taking into account pharmacological considerations and CD19 marker testing utility. Despite the fact that the drug has been in use for years, efficacy and treatment schedules in adults with nephrotic syndrome are still a matter of debate. Clinical trials have proven the efficacy and safety of rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Data from observational studies also showed the efficacy of rituximab in minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Rituximab use is now widely recommended by new Kidney Disease Improved Outcome (KDIGO) guidelines in membranous nephropathy and in frequent-relapsing, steroid-dependent minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. However, rituximab response has a large interindividual variability. One reason could be that rituximab is lost in the urine at a higher extent in patients with nonselective nephrotic proteinuria, exposing patients to different rituximab plasma levels. Moreover, the association between CD19+ levels and clinical response or relapses is not always present, making the use of this marker in clinical practice complex. High resolution flow cytometry has increased the capability of detecting residual CD19+ B cells. Moreover, it can identify specific B-cell subsets (including IgG-switched memory B cells), which can repopulate at different rates. Its wider use could become a useful tool for better understanding reasons of rituximab failure or avoiding unnecessary retreatments.

Consolidation Treatment and Long-Term Prognosis of Rituximab in Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerular Sclerosis

Purpose

There is currently a lack of studies investigating long-term prognosis and the necessity of further rituximab (RTX) consolidation treatment for minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RTX for these diseases and to investigate whether a consolidation treatment can lower risks of relapse and reinforce long-term remission.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted. The relapse and remission of 70 patients treated with 1 course of RTX treatment (4 infusions of 375 mg/m2) over a median follow-up time of 27 months (12–60 months) were analyzed. The rates of patients that were able to achieve non-relapse for a duration of 24 months between RTX consolidation therapy and non-consolidation therapy were compared.

Results

There were 67 cases (95.71%) of remission and 3 cases (4.29%) of non-remission. The average number of relapses decreased from 3.7±2.5 times before the treatment to 0.8±1.8 times after treatment (P <0.001). The average avannual number of relapses decreased from 1.3±1.2 times/year to 0.2±0.3 times/year (P <0.001). The results from the Cox proportional-hazards model showed that the risk of relapse in patients who received RTX non-consolidation treatment was significantly higher than those with consolidation treatment (odds ratios (OR) 20.9, 95% confidence intervals (CI) OR 5.7–75.7, p<0.001). The 24-month relapse-free rate was also significantly higher in patients with consolidation therapy compared with non-consolidation therapy (86.36% vs 25%, p<0.001). No adverse events were recorded.

Conclusion

RTX is highly effective in treating MCD and FSGS, and RTX consolidation therapy may be recommended to reinforce long-term remissions.

All-case Japanese post-marketing surveillance of the real-world safety and efficacy of rituximab treatment in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is conditionally approved in Japan for use in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome. To meet the conditions of approval, an all-case post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to confirm the real-world safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients of all ages with refractory nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

All patients scheduled to receive rituximab treatment for refractory nephrotic syndrome were eligible to register (registration: August 29, 2014 through April 15, 2016); the planned observation period was 2 years from the initiation of rituximab treatment (intravenous infusion, 375 mg/m² once weekly for four doses). The study was conducted at 227 hospitals throughout Japan. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected for safety outcomes. The efficacy outcomes were relapse-free period and the degree of growth in pediatric (< 15 years) patients.

RESULTS

In total, 997 (447 pediatric) patients were registered; 981 (445) were included in the safety analysis set; 852 (402) completed the 2-year observation period; and 810 (429) were included in the efficacy analysis set. Refractory nephrotic syndrome had developed in childhood for 85.0% of patients, and 54.6% were aged ≥15 years. ADRs were observed in 527 (53.7%) patients, treatment-related infection/infestation in 235 (24.0%) patients, and infusion reactions in 313 (31.9%) patients. The relapse-free period was 580 days (95% confidence interval, 511-664). There was a significant change in height standard deviation score (pediatric patients; mean change, 0.093; standard deviation, 0.637; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of rituximab treatment in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome were confirmed in the real-world setting.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000014997.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult frequent-relapsing or steroid-dependent minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in adult frequent-relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent (SD) nephrotic syndrome (NS), including minimal change disease (MCD) or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), are still inconclusive.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis registered in  PROSPERO (CRD42019148102) by pooling data of cohort studies or case series on adult patients with difficult-to-treat NS. Steroid-resistant NS was excluded. The primary outcomes were the complete remission (CR) rate and the relapse rate. Partial remission (PR) rate, no response (NR) rate and adverse events were the secondary outcomes. A random-effects model was performed for all the outcomes.

Results

We included 21 studies involving 382 adult MCD/FSGS subjects with a median follow-up duration from 12 to 43 months. RTX treatment induced a pooled 84.2% CR rate [95% confidence interval (CI): 67.7–96.3%], while MCD patients had a high 91.6% CR rate and FSGS patients a moderate 43% CR rate. However, 27.4% (95% CI 20.7–34.5%) of the patients relapsed during the follow-up. The pooled PR and NR rates were 5.8% (95% CI 1.2–12.5%) and 5.2% (95% CI 0.0–15.0%), respectively. RTX was associated with trivial adverse events and good tolerance.

Conclusions

In summary, by pooling results of current pilot studies, RTX may be an effective and relatively safe alternative for most adult FR or SD MCD/FSGS to displace calcineurin inhibitors or prednisone in the hierarchy of treatment. More clinical trials comparing RTX with other immunosuppressants and concerning the long-term adverse events are needed.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Due to Minimal Change Disease Requiring Acute Renal Replacement Therapy

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) has been developed as a therapy for familial hypercholesterolemia, but LDL-A has also been used as a general treatment for drug-resistant nephrotic syndrome (NS) due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). The patients with NS due to minimal change disease (MCD) are often difficult to control effective circulating plasma volume, causes acute kidney injury (AKI), and when diuretics are not effective and the respiratory condition of patients worsens, patients require acute renal replacement therapy (ARRT). The effectiveness of LDL-A is not only reduction of serum low-density lipoprotein but also various other benefits. LDL-A might have improved renal hemodynamics by reducing vasoconstrictive eicosanoids and contributed to the therapeutic effect of antiproteinuric drugs such as corticosteroids. We treated a 49-year-old Japanese woman and a 71-year-old Japanese man with AKI caused by NS due to MCD, who required ARRT. Although these patients received ARRT and corticosteroids, their AKI and MCD did not improve sufficiently. We initiated LDL-A treatment for these patients as an additional treatment modality, because their total serum cholesterol levels were high at the time of admission. After the additional LDL-A treatment, both patients were able to discontinue ARRT, because NS and AKI in both patients were improved sufficiently. It is possible that early additional LDL-A is effective for patients with AKI and NS due to MCD who require ARRT, and may help patients discontinue ARRT because of the effect of LDL-A such as improving hypercoagulability and renal hemodynamics and contributing to the therapeutic effect of corticosteroids.

Morphological Features of Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Using Repeat Biopsy and Parietal Epithelial Cell Marker

Introduction

Minimal change disease (MCD) and primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are representative podocyte diseases. The clinical cause of MCD and FSGS has not been clearly elucidated yet. However, it is important to distinguish MCD and FSGS because their prognoses and responses to treatment are quite different.

Objective

This study aimed to examine whether parietal epithelial cell (PEC) marker and repeat biopsy are useful for diagnosing primary FSGS.

Methods

Clinicopathological features of 17 patients with the nephrotic syndrome, who underwent kidney biopsy ≥2 times from 1975 to 2017, and had MCD or FSGS were analyzed using PAX8. We defined patients with PAX8+ cells as PAX8+ and the remainder as PAX8- patients. Three cases of sample insufficiency and 1 non-steroid-resistant or frequently relapsing case indicated for repeat biopsy were excluded.

Results

Among the 13 patients studied, 4 were PAX8+ and 9 were PAX8- (median age: 41 and 46 years, -respectively, at first biopsy). PAX8+ and PAX8- patients showed no significant differences in clinical data and histological diagnosis except for a significant difference in histological diagnosis at the second biopsy. The number of PAX8+ patients increased to 6. Unlike the first biopsy results, FSGS was present in 5 of 6 (83.3%) PAX8+ patients; MCD occurred in all 7 (100%) PAX8- patients. Three of 6 (50.0%) PAX8+ patients undergoing repeat biopsy were steroid resistant; no (0%) PAX8- patient was steroid resistant. All cases of final FSGS diagnosis were PAX8+ at the first or second biopsy. Only 1 PAX8+ MCD patient was steroid resistant. All PAX8- MCD patients were frequently relapsing.

Conclusions

More PAX8+ patients were diagnosed with FSGS than PAX8- patients. Clinical presentation of MCD in PAX8- patients was frequently relapsing. PEC marker staining in patients with the nephrotic syndrome, e.g., MCD, may help to diagnose FSGS.