Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

How Switching Musical Instruments Affects Pitch Discrimination for Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implant (CI) users struggle with music perception. Generally, they have poorer pitch discrimination and timbre identification than peers with normal hearing, which reduces their overall music appreciation and quality of life. This study's primary aim was to characterize how the increased difficulty of comparing pitch changes across musical instruments affects CI users and their peers with no known hearing loss. The motivation is to better understand the challenges that CI users face with polyphonic music listening. The primary hypothesis was that CI users would be more affected by instrument switching than those with no known hearing loss. The rationale was that poorer pitch and timbre perception through a CI hinders the disassociation between pitch and timbre changes needed for this demanding task.

DESIGN

Pitch discrimination was measured for piano and tenor saxophone including conditions with pitch comparisons across instruments. Adult participants included 15 CI users and 15 peers with no known hearing loss. Pitch discrimination was measured for 4 note ranges centered on A2 (110 Hz), A3 (220 Hz), A4 (440 Hz), and A5 (880 Hz). The effect of instrument switching was quantified as the change in discrimination thresholds with and without instrument switching. Analysis of variance and Spearman's rank correlation were used to test group differences and relational outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Although CI users had worse pitch discrimination, the additional difficulty of instrument switching did not significantly differ between groups. Discrimination thresholds in both groups were about two times worse with instrument switching than without. Further analyses, however, revealed that CI users were biased toward ranking tenor saxophone higher in pitch compared with piano, whereas those with no known hearing loss were not so biased. In addition, CI users were significantly more affected by instrument switching for the A5 note range.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of the effect of instrument switching on pitch resolution was similar for CI users and their peers with no known hearing loss. However, CI users were biased toward ranking tenor saxophone as higher in pitch and were significantly more affected by instrument switching for pitches near A5. These findings might reflect poorer temporal coding of fundamental frequency by CIs.

Limitations on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Users: A Compilation of Viewpoints

Cochlear implant (CI) users are usually poor at using timing information to detect changes in either pitch or sound location. This deficit occurs even for listeners with good speech perception and even when the speech processor is bypassed to present simple, idealized stimuli to one or more electrodes. The present article presents seven expert opinion pieces on the likely neural bases for these limitations, the extent to which they are modifiable by sensory experience and training, and the most promising ways to overcome them in future. The article combines insights from physiology and psychophysics in cochlear-implanted humans and animals, highlights areas of agreement and controversy, and proposes new experiments that could resolve areas of disagreement.

Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users

Cochlear implants are medical devices that have restored hearing to approximately one million people around the world. Outcomes are impressive and most recipients attain excellent speech comprehension in quiet without relying on lip-reading cues, but pitch resolution is poor compared to normal hearing. Amplitude modulation of electrical stimulation is a primary cue for pitch perception in cochlear implant users. The experiments described in this article focus on the relationship between sensitivity to amplitude modulations and pitch resolution based on changes in the frequency of amplitude modulations. In the first experiment, modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution were measured in adults with no known hearing loss and in cochlear implant users with sounds presented to and processed by their clinical devices. Stimuli were amplitude-modulated sinusoids and amplitude-modulated narrow-band noises. Modulation detection and modulation frequency discrimination were measured for modulation frequencies centered on 110, 220, and 440 Hz. Pitch resolution based on changes in modulation frequency was measured for modulation depths of 25 %, 50 %, 100 %, and for a half-waved rectified modulator. Results revealed a strong linear relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution for cochlear implant users and peers with no known hearing loss. In the second experiment, cochlear implant users took part in analogous procedures of modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution but bypassing clinical sound processing using single-electrode stimulation. Results indicated that modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution was better conveyed by single-electrode stimulation than by clinical processors. Results at 440 Hz were worse, but also not well conveyed by clinical sound processing, so it remains unclear whether the 300 Hz perceptual limit described in the literature is a technological or biological limitation. These results highlight modulation depth and sensitivity as critical factors for pitch resolution in cochlear implant users and characterize the relationship that should inform the design of modulation enhancement algorithms for cochlear implants.

Temporal pitch matching with bilateral cochlear implants

Interaural pitch matching is a common task used with bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, although studies measuring this have largely focused on place-based pitch matches. Temporal-based pitch also plays an important role in CI users' perception, but interaural temporal-based pitch matching has not been well characterized for CI users. To investigate this, bilateral CI users were asked to match amplitude modulation frequencies of stimulation across ears. Comparisons were made to previous place-based pitch matching data that were collected using similar procedures. The results indicate that temporal-based pitch matching is particularly sensitive to the choice of reference ear.

Pitch discrimination in electric hearing with inconsistent and consistent amplitude-modulation and inter-pulse rate cues

Users of cochlear implants (CIs) struggle in situations that require selective hearing to focus on a target source while ignoring other sources. One major reason for that is the limited access to timing cues such as temporal pitch or interaural time differences (ITDs). Various approaches to improve timing-cue sensitivity while maintaining speech understanding have been proposed, among them inserting extra pulses with short inter-pulse intervals (SIPIs) into amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains. Indeed, SIPI rates matching the naturally occurring AM rates improve pitch discrimination. For ITD, however, low SIPI rates are required, potentially mismatching the naturally occurring AM rates and thus creating unknown pitch effects. In this study, we investigated the perceptual contribution of AM and SIPI rate to pitch discrimination in five CI listeners and with two AM depths (0.1 and 0.5). Our results show that the SIPI-rate cue generally dominated the percept for both consistent and inconsistent cues. When tested with inconsistent cues, also the AM rate contributed, however, at the large AM depth only. These findings have implications when aiming at jointly improving temporal-pitch and ITD sensitivity in a future mixed-rate stimulation approach.

Asymmetric temporal envelope sensitivity: Within- and across-ear envelope comparisons in listeners with bilateral cochlear implants

For listeners with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs), patient-specific differences in the interface between cochlear implant (CI) electrodes and the auditory nerve can lead to degraded temporal envelope information, compromising the ability to distinguish between targets of interest and background noise. It is unclear how comparisons of degraded temporal envelope information across spectral channels (i.e., electrodes) affect the ability to detect differences in the temporal envelope, specifically amplitude modulation (AM) rate. In this study, two pulse trains were presented simultaneously via pairs of electrodes in different places of stimulation, within and/or across ears, with identical or differing AM rates. Results from 11 adults with BiCIs indicated that sensitivity to differences in AM rate was greatest when stimuli were paired between different places of stimulation in the same ear. Sensitivity from pairs of electrodes was predicted by the poorer electrode in the pair or the difference in fidelity between both electrodes in the pair. These findings suggest that electrodes yielding poorer temporal fidelity act as a bottleneck to comparisons of temporal information across frequency and ears, limiting access to the cues used to segregate sounds, which has important implications for device programming and optimizing patient outcomes with CIs.

Combining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users

In the auditory system, frequency is represented as tonotopic and temporal response properties of the auditory nerve. While these response properties are inextricably linked in normal hearing, cochlear implants can separately excite tonotopic location and temporal synchrony using different electrodes and stimulation rates, respectively. This separation allows for the investigation of the contributions of tonotopic and temporal cues for frequency discrimination. The present study examines frequency discrimination in adult cochlear implant users as conveyed by electrode position and stimulation rate, separately and combined. The working hypothesis is that frequency discrimination is better provided by place and rate cues combined compared to either cue alone. This hypothesis was tested in two experiments. In the first experiment, frequency discrimination needed for melodic contour identification was measured for frequencies near 100, 200, and 400 Hz using frequency allocation modeled after clinical processors. In the second experiment, frequency discrimination for pitch ranking was measured for frequencies between 100 and 1600 Hz using an experimental frequency allocation designed to provide better access to place cues. The results of both experiments indicate that frequency discrimination is better with place and rate cues combined than with either cue alone. These results clarify how signal processing for cochlear implants could better encode frequency into place and rate of electrical stimulation. Further, the results provide insight into the contributions of place and rate cues for pitch.

Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation

Cochlear implants are medical devices that provide hearing to nearly one million people around the world. Outcomes are impressive with most recipients learning to understand speech through this new way of hearing. Music perception and speech reception in noise, however, are notably poor. These aspects of hearing critically depend on sensitivity to pitch, whether the musical pitch of an instrument or the vocal pitch of speech. The present article examines cues for pitch perception in the auditory nerve based on computational models. Modeled neural synchrony for pure and complex tones is examined for three different electric stimulation strategies including Continuous Interleaved Sampling (CIS), High-Fidelity CIS (HDCIS), and Peak-Derived Timing (PDT). Computational modeling of current spread and neuronal response are used to predict neural activity to electric and acoustic stimulation. It is shown that CIS does not provide neural synchrony to the frequency of pure tones nor to the fundamental component of complex tones. The newer HDCIS and PDT strategies restore synchrony to both the frequency of pure tones and to the fundamental component of complex tones. Current spread reduces spatial specificity of excitation as well as the temporal fidelity of neural synchrony, but modeled neural excitation restores precision of these cues. Overall, modeled neural excitation to electric stimulation that incorporates temporal fine structure (e.g., HDCIS and PDT) indicates neural synchrony comparable to that provided by acoustic stimulation. Discussion considers the importance of stimulation rate and long-term rehabilitation to provide temporal cues for pitch perception.