Whistling While it Works: Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions and the Cochlear Amplifier

Cochlear representation of wideband biosonar sounds and the emergence of neural oscillations

Echolocating big brown bats and bottlenose dolphins broadcast wideband ultrasonic echolocation calls in the baseband to sense their surroundings. Even though these species inhabit different media and emit echolocation calls with different spectra, both show similar perceptual acuity: They determine target range from echo delay, they detect changes in echo delay on a microsecond scale, and they perceive ultrasonic phase. These perceptual performances are too acute to understand on the basis of single neuron responses, and even neural population responses do not reach the required behavioral values. Here we propose two mechanisms that may contribute to temporal hyperacuity in these wideband echolocators. Structural imaging studies show that in both species the cochlea receives input from the middle ear at locations different from that seen in non-echolocating mammals. These unusual patterns of input might produce interference patterns in traveling waves along the basilar membrane, which in turn could facilitate detection of ultrasonic phase by producing low difference frequencies that may form a substrate for further neural processing into perception. The second mechanism is related to oscillations of evoked activity observed in the bat's inferior colliculus, which could create broadcast-echo interference patterns at the neural level. The resulting difference-frequency interference signals would be very sensitive to changes in echo delay and phase. Small changes in ultrasonic sounds thus could lead to much larger changes in neural response timing by magnifying echo time itself.

How Exceptional Is the Ear?

Studies of hearing often conclude that the ear is "remarkable" or that its performance is "exceptional." Some common examples include the following: ▹  the ears of mammals are encased in the hardest bone in the body; ▹  the ear contains the most vascularized tissue in body; ▹  the ear has the highest resting potential in the body; ▹  ears have a unique "fingerprint"; ▹  the ear can detect signals below the thermal noise floor; and ▹  the ear is highly nonlinear (or highly linear, depending upon who you ask). Some claims hold up to further scrutiny, while others do not. Additionally, several claims hold for animals in one taxon, while others are shared across taxa. Most frequently, our sense of wonder results from the differences between ears as products of natural selection (over eons) and artificial systems as products of engineering design. Our goal in analyzing claims of remarkable or exceptional performance is to deepen our appreciation of these differences.

Sources of Microstructure in Mammalian Cochlear Responses

Quasiperiodic fluctuations with frequency are observed in a variety of responses that either originate from or strongly depend on the cochlea's active mechanics. These spectral microstructures are unique and stable features of individual ears and have been most thoroughly studied in behavioral hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). While the exact morphology of the microstructure patterns may differ across measurement types, the patterns are interrelated and are thought to depend on common mechanisms. This review summarizes the characteristics and proposed origins of the microstructures observed in behavioral and OAE responses, as well as other mechanical and electrophysiological responses of the mammalian cochlea. Throughout, the work of Glenis Long and colleagues is highlighted. Long contributed greatly to our understanding of microstructure and its perceptual consequences, as well as to the development of techniques for reducing the impact of microstructure on OAE-based assays of cochlear function.

Something in Our Ears Is Oscillating, but What? A Modeller's View of Efforts to Model Spontaneous Emissions

When David Kemp discovered "spontaneous ear noise" in 1978, it opened up a whole new perspective on how the cochlea works. The continuous tonal sound emerging from most healthy human ears, now called spontaneous otoacoustic emissions or SOAEs, was an unmistakable sign that our hearing organ must be considered an active detector, not just a passive microphone, just as Thomas Gold had speculated some 30 years earlier. Clearly, something is oscillating as a byproduct of that sensitive inbuilt detector, but what exactly is it? Here, we give a chronological account of efforts to model SOAEs as some form of oscillator, and at intervals, we illustrate key concepts with numerical simulations. We find that after many decades there is still no consensus, and the debate extends to whether the oscillator is local, confined to discrete local sources on the basilar membrane, or global, in which an assembly of micro-mechanical elements and basilar membrane sections, coupled by inner ear fluid, interact over a wide region. It is also undecided whether the cochlear oscillator is best described in terms of the well-known Van der Pol oscillator or the less familiar Duffing or Hopf oscillators. We find that irregularities play a key role in generating the emissions. This paper is not a systematic review of SOAEs and their properties but more a historical survey of the way in which various oscillator configurations have been applied to modelling human ears. The conclusion is that the difference between the local and global approaches is not clear-cut, and they are probably not mutually exclusive concepts. Nevertheless, when one sees how closely human SOAEs can be matched to certain arrangements of oscillators, Gold would no doubt say we are on the right track.

Emergence of rogue-like waves in a reaction-diffusion system: Stochastic output from deterministic dissipative dynamics

Rogue waves are an intriguing nonlinear phenomenon arising across different scales, ranging from ocean waves through optics to Bose-Einstein condensates. We describe the emergence of rogue wave-like dynamics in a reaction-diffusion system that arise as a result of a subcritical Turing instability. This state is present in a regime where all time-independent states are unstable and consists of intermittent excitation of spatially localized spikes, followed by collapse to an unstable state and subsequent regrowth. We characterize the spatiotemporal organization of spikes and show that in sufficiently large domains the dynamics are consistent with a memoryless process.

Cochlear Function in Individuals with and without Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions

PURPOSE

This study investigated the status of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) on cochlear function in a cohort of male/female participants with a wide age range. It examined whether there was a correlation between the presence of SOAEs and measurements of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), SOAEs and extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing thresholds.

METHODS

463 participants (222 male, 241 female; age range 20-59 years) with pure-tone thresholds ≤25 dB HL for octave frequencies of 500-8000 Hz were included in the study, divided into three age groups (20-29, 30-39, and 40-59 years). Evaluations included EHF (9000-16,000 Hz) hearing thresholds and TEOAE, DPOAE and SOAE measures.

RESULTS

Multiple regression models showed that participants with SOAEs had larger expected amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for TEOAE and DPOAE responses than participants without SOAEs, holding gender and age variables constant. Spearman correlation tests identified deterioration in TEOAE and DPOAE amplitudes and SNRs, and EHF hearing thresholds with age in participants without SOAEs. Among participants with SOAEs, no significant decreases in TEOAE and DPOAE measures were shown in participants with older age. Nonetheless, as expected, EHF hearing thresholds did become worse with age, with or without SOAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with identifiable SOAEs had greater TEOAE and DPOAE amplitudes and SNRs than participants without SOAEs. SOAEs appear to be a useful marker of cochlear health in adults.

The Long Outer-Hair-Cell RC Time Constant: A Feature, Not a Bug, of the Mammalian Cochlea

The cochlea of the mammalian inner ear includes an active, hydromechanical amplifier thought to arise via the piezoelectric action of the outer hair cells (OHCs). A classic problem of cochlear biophysics is that the RC (resistance-capacitance) time constant of the hair-cell membrane appears inconveniently long, producing an effective cut-off frequency much lower than that of most audible sounds. The long RC time constant implies that the OHC receptor potential-and hence its electromotile response-decreases by roughly two orders of magnitude over the frequency range of mammalian hearing, casting doubt on the hypothesized role of cycle-by-cycle OHC-based amplification in mammalian hearing. Here, we review published data and basic physics to show that the "RC problem" has been magnified by viewing it through the wrong lens. Our analysis finds no appreciable mismatch between the expected magnitude of high-frequency electromotility and the sound-evoked displacements of the organ of Corti. Rather than precluding significant OHC-based boosts to auditory sensitivity, the long RC time constant appears beneficial for hearing, reducing the effects of internal noise and distortion while increasing the fidelity of cochlear amplification.

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle-ear pressure gains in a finite-element mouse model

For evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), the stimulus and emission signals traverse the middle ear (ME) in forward and reverse directions, respectively. In this study, a fully coupled three-dimensional finite-element model of the mouse ear canal (EC), ME, and cochlea was used to calculate ME pressure gains, impedances, and reflectances at the EC-entrance and stapes-footplate-cochlear-fluid interfaces. The cochlear model incorporates a series of interdigitated Y-shaped structures sandwiched between the basilar membrane and reticular lamina, each comprised of a Deiters' cell, its phalangeal-process extension, and an outer hair cell (OHC). By introducing random perturbations to the OHC gains, stimulation-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) were generated. Raising the perturbation magnitude from 10% to 80% increased the SFOAE magnitude by up to 24 dB in the 10-30 kHz frequency range. Increasing or decreasing the stiffness of the stapes annular ligament and eardrum by a factor of 8 changed the SFOAEs by up to 30 dB, but the round-trip ME gain as measured could not account for this. A modified round-trip ME gain, with reflections removed at the EC-entrance and stapes-cochlea boundaries, eliminated a ±10 dB discrepancy and allowed ME changes to be quantitatively associated with changes in measured OAEs.

Unloading outer hair cell bundles in vivo does not yield evidence of spontaneous oscillations in the mouse cochlea

Along with outer hair cell (OHC) somatic electromotility as the actuator of cochlear amplification, active hair bundle motility may be a complementary mechanism in the mammalian auditory system. Here, we searched the mouse cochlea for the presence of spontaneous bundle oscillations that have been observed in non-mammalian ears. In those systems, removal of the overlying membrane is necessary for spontaneous bundle oscillations to manifest. Thus, we used a genetic mouse model with a C1509G (cysteine-to-glycine) point mutation in the Tecta gene where the tectorial (TM) is lifted away from the OHC bundles, allowing us to explore whether unloaded bundles spontaneously oscillate. We used VOCTV in vivo to detect OHC length changes due to electromotility as a proxy for the spontaneous opening and closing of the mechanoelectrical transduction (MET) channels associated with bundle oscillation. In wild type mice with the TM attached to OHC bundles, we did find peaks in vibratory magnitude spectra. Such peaks were not observed in the mutants where the TM is detached from the OHC bundles. Statistical analysis of the time signals indicates that these peaks do not signify active oscillations. Rather, they are filtered responses of the sensitive wild type cochlea to weak background noise. We therefore conclude that, to the limits of our system (∼30 pm), there is no spontaneous mechanical activity that manifests as oscillations in OHC electromotility within the mouse cochlea, arguing that unloaded OHC bundles do not oscillate in vivo. This article is part of the Special Issue Outer hair cell Edited by Joseph Santos-Sacchi and Kumar Navaratnam.

Non-invasive auditory brainstem responses to FM sweeps in awake big brown bats

We introduce two EEG techniques, one based on conventional monopolar electrodes and one based on a novel tripolar electrode, to record for the first time auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) from the scalp of unanesthetized, unrestrained big brown bats. Stimuli were frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps varying in sweep direction, sweep duration, and harmonic structure. As expected from previous invasive ABR recordings, upward-sweeping FM signals evoked larger amplitude responses (peak-to-trough amplitude in the latency range of 3–5 ms post-stimulus onset) than downward-sweeping FM signals. Scalp-recorded responses displayed amplitude-latency trading effects as expected from invasive recordings. These two findings validate the reliability of our noninvasive recording techniques. The feasibility of recording noninvasively in unanesthetized, unrestrained bats will energize future research uncovering electrophysiological signatures of perceptual and cognitive processing of biosonar signals in these animals, and allows for better comparison with ABR data from echolocating cetaceans, where invasive experiments are heavily restricted.