A Computational Model of a Single Auditory Nerve Fiber for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation

A Computational Model of the Electrically or Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Hearing

OBJECTIVE

In cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing, compound action potentials (CAPs) can be evoked by acoustic (aCAP) or electric (eCAP) stimulation and recorded through the electrodes of the implant. We propose a novel computational model to simulate aCAPs and eCAPs in humans, considering the interaction between combined electric-acoustic stimulation that occurs in the auditory nerve.

METHODS

The model consists of three components: a 3D finite element method model of an implanted cochlea, a phenomenological single-neuron spiking model for electric-acoustic stimulation, and a physiological multi-compartment neuron model to simulate the individual nerve fiber contributions to the CAP.

RESULTS

The CAP morphologies closely resembled those known from humans. The spread of excitation derived from eCAPs by varying the recording electrode along the cochlear implant electrode array was consistent with published human data. The predicted CAP amplitude growth functions largely resembled human data, with deviations in absolute CAP amplitudes for acoustic stimulation. The model reproduced the suppression of eCAPs by simultaneously presented acoustic tone bursts for different masker frequencies and probe stimulation electrodes.

CONCLUSION

The proposed model can simulate CAP responses to electric, acoustic, or combined electric-acoustic stimulation. It considers the dependence on stimulation and recording sites in the cochlea, as well as the interaction between electric and acoustic stimulation in the auditory nerve.

SIGNIFICANCE

The model enhances comprehension of CAPs and peripheral electric-acoustic interaction. It can be used in the future to investigate objective methods, such as hearing threshold assessment or estimation of neural health through aCAPs or eCAPs.

Pulsatile electrical stimulation creates predictable, correctable disruptions in neural firing

Electrical stimulation is a key tool in neuroscience, both in brain mapping studies and in many therapeutic applications such as cochlear, vestibular, and retinal neural implants. Due to safety considerations, stimulation is restricted to short biphasic pulses. Despite decades of research and development, neural implants lead to varying restoration of function in patients. In this study, we use computational modeling to provide an explanation for how pulsatile stimulation affects axonal channels and therefore leads to variability in restoration of neural responses. The phenomenological explanation is transformed into equations that predict induced firing rate as a function of pulse rate, pulse amplitude, and spontaneous firing rate. We show that these equations predict simulated responses to pulsatile stimulation with a variety of parameters as well as several features of experimentally recorded primate vestibular afferent responses to pulsatile stimulation. We then discuss the implications of these effects for improving clinical stimulation paradigms and electrical stimulation-based experiments.

A dynamical computational model of theta generation in hippocampal circuits to study theta-gamma oscillations during neurostimulation

Neurostimulation of the hippocampal formation has shown promising results for modulating memory but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In particular, the effects on hippocampal theta-nested gamma oscillations and theta phase reset, which are both crucial for memory processes, are unknown. Moreover, these effects cannot be investigated using current computational models, which consider theta oscillations with a fixed amplitude and phase velocity. Here, we developed a novel computational model that includes the medial septum, represented as a set of abstract Kuramoto oscillators producing a dynamical theta rhythm with phase reset, and the hippocampal formation, composed of biophysically realistic neurons and able to generate theta-nested gamma oscillations under theta drive. We showed that, for theta inputs just below the threshold to induce self-sustained theta-nested gamma oscillations, a single stimulation pulse could switch the network behavior from non-oscillatory to a state producing sustained oscillations. Next, we demonstrated that, for a weaker theta input, pulse train stimulation at the theta frequency could transiently restore seemingly physiological oscillations. Importantly, the presence of phase reset influenced whether these two effects depended on the phase at which stimulation onset was delivered, which has practical implications for designing neurostimulation protocols that are triggered by the phase of ongoing theta oscillations. This novel model opens new avenues for studying the effects of neurostimulation on the hippocampal formation. Furthermore, our hybrid approach that combines different levels of abstraction could be extended in future work to other neural circuits that produce dynamical brain rhythms.