• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4598979)   Today's Articles (2117)   Subscriber (49356)
For: Pfingst BE, Franck KH, Xu L, Bauer EM, Zwolan TA. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001;2:87-103. [PMID: 11550528 PMCID: PMC3201186 DOI: 10.1007/s101620010065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Saba JN, Ali H, Hansen JHL. The effects of estimation accuracy, estimation approach, and number of selected channels using formant-priority channel selection for an "n-of-m" sound processing strategy for cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2023;153:3100. [PMID: 37227411 PMCID: PMC10219683 DOI: 10.1121/10.0019416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
2
Apical Reference Stimulation: A Possible Solution to Facial Nerve Stimulation. Ear Hear 2021;43:1189-1197. [PMID: 34923558 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
3
Bissmeyer SRS, Hossain S, Goldsworthy RL. Perceptual learning of pitch provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate. PLoS One 2020;15:e0242842. [PMID: 33270735 PMCID: PMC7714175 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
4
Ozdemir I, Bozdemir K, Callioglu EE, Bayazit D, Şalviz M. Effects of a sequential cochlear implant of minimum comfort, impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential values of the initial cochlear implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277:2235-2241. [PMID: 32447497 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06062-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
5
Rayes H, Al-Malky G, Vickers D. Systematic Review of Auditory Training in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2019;62:1574-1593. [PMID: 31039327 DOI: 10.1044/2019_jslhr-h-18-0252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
6
van de Velde DJ, Schiller NO, van Heuven VJ, Levelt CC, van Ginkel J, Beers M, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM. The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2017;141:3349. [PMID: 28599540 PMCID: PMC5436976 DOI: 10.1121/1.4982198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Revised: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
7
Zhou N. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition. PLoS One 2016;11:e0165476. [PMID: 27798658 PMCID: PMC5087957 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]  Open
8
George SS, Shivdasani MN, Fallon JB. Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2016;116:1104-16. [PMID: 27306672 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00126.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
9
Zhou N, Pfingst BE. Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2016;140:1537. [PMID: 27914377 PMCID: PMC5392072 DOI: 10.1121/1.4962230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Revised: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
10
George SS, Shivdasani MN, Wise AK, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB. Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants. J Neural Eng 2015;12:066005. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
11
Scheperle RA, Abbas PJ. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2015;36:441-53. [PMID: 25658746 PMCID: PMC4478147 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
12
Khater A, El Shennaway A, Anany A. Improvement of cochlear implant performance: changes in dynamic range. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.4103/1012-5574.152706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
13
Bierer JA, Bierer SM, Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ. A fast method for measuring psychophysical thresholds across the cochlear implant array. Trends Hear 2015;19:19/0/2331216515569792. [PMID: 25656797 PMCID: PMC4324086 DOI: 10.1177/2331216515569792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]  Open
14
Mesnildrey Q, Macherey O. Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: effects on speech intelligibility. Hear Res 2014;319:32-47. [PMID: 25449010 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2014] [Revised: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/05/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
15
Wanna GB, Noble JH, Carlson ML, Gifford RH, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS, Dawant BM, Labadie RF. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes. Laryngoscope 2014;124 Suppl 6:S1-7. [PMID: 24764083 DOI: 10.1002/lary.24728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2014] [Revised: 04/16/2014] [Accepted: 04/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
16
Bingabr MG, Espinoza-Varas B, Sigdel S. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe. Cochlear Implants Int 2014;15:166-72. [PMID: 24606491 DOI: 10.1179/1754762814y.0000000065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
17
Wise AK, Gillespie LN. Drug delivery to the inner ear. J Neural Eng 2012;9:065002. [PMID: 23186937 PMCID: PMC4222974 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/6/065002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
18
Schoenecker MC, Bonham BH, Stakhovskaya OA, Snyder RL, Leake PA. Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2012;13:655-72. [PMID: 22722899 PMCID: PMC3441950 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0333-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2011] [Accepted: 04/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]  Open
19
Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2012;290:21-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2012] [Revised: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
20
Lee FP, Hsu HT, Lin YS, Hung SC. Effects of the electrode location on tonal discrimination and speech perception of Mandarin-speaking patients with a cochlear implant. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1366-78. [PMID: 22569966 DOI: 10.1002/lary.23313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2011] [Revised: 02/24/2012] [Accepted: 02/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
21
Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Srinivasan AG. Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2012;284:16-24. [PMID: 22230370 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2011] [Revised: 12/21/2011] [Accepted: 12/28/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
22
Zhu Z, Tang Q, Zeng FG, Guan T, Ye D. Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation. Hear Res 2012;283:45-58. [PMID: 22138630 PMCID: PMC3277661 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2010] [Revised: 10/28/2011] [Accepted: 11/08/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
23
Assessment of electrode placement and audiological outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:428-32. [PMID: 21283037 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3182096dc2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
24
Lu T, Litovsky R, Zeng FG. Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011;129:3934-45. [PMID: 21682415 PMCID: PMC3135149 DOI: 10.1121/1.3570948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2010] [Revised: 03/02/2011] [Accepted: 03/04/2011] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
25
Schuman TA, Noble JH, Wright CG, Wanna GB, Dawant B, Labadie RF. Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography. Laryngoscope 2011;120:2277-83. [PMID: 20939074 DOI: 10.1002/lary.21104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
26
Tonal Languages and Cochlear Implants. AUDITORY PROSTHESES 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9434-9_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
27
Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2009;29:920-8. [PMID: 18667935 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318184f492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 386] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
28
Zhou N, Xu L. Lexical tone recognition with spectrally mismatched envelopes. Hear Res 2008;246:36-43. [PMID: 18848614 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2008] [Revised: 09/16/2008] [Accepted: 09/17/2008] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
29
Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2008;29:435-52. [PMID: 18344869 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31816a0d3d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
30
Middlebrooks JC. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 2008;100:92-107. [PMID: 18450583 PMCID: PMC2493502 DOI: 10.1152/jn.01114.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2007] [Accepted: 04/25/2008] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
31
Bingabr M, Espinoza-Varas B, Loizou PC. Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2008;241:73-9. [PMID: 18556160 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2007] [Revised: 04/26/2008] [Accepted: 04/28/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
32
Bonham BH, Litvak LM. Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics. Hear Res 2008;242:141-53. [PMID: 18501539 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2007] [Revised: 03/20/2008] [Accepted: 03/25/2008] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
33
Fallon JB, Irvine DRF, Shepherd RK. Cochlear implants and brain plasticity. Hear Res 2008;238:110-7. [PMID: 17910997 PMCID: PMC2361156 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2007] [Revised: 08/15/2007] [Accepted: 08/15/2007] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
34
Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity. Hear Res 2007;235:23-38. [PMID: 18037252 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2007] [Revised: 08/16/2007] [Accepted: 09/14/2007] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
35
Litvak LM, Spahr AJ, Emadi G. Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2007;122:967-81. [PMID: 17672645 DOI: 10.1121/1.2749414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
36
Arnoldner C, Riss D, Baumgartner WD, Kaider A, Hamzavi JS. Cochlear Implant Channel Separation and Its Influence on Speech Perception – Implications for a New Electrode Design. Audiol Neurootol 2007;12:313-24. [PMID: 17536200 DOI: 10.1159/000103212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2006] [Accepted: 03/30/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
37
Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:220-33. [PMID: 17318276 PMCID: PMC2394499 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 294] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2006] [Accepted: 01/20/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]  Open
38
Başkent D. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006;120:2908-25. [PMID: 17139748 DOI: 10.1121/1.2354017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
39
Kwon BJ, van den Honert C. Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006;119:2994-3002. [PMID: 16708955 DOI: 10.1121/1.2184128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
40
Xu L, Zwolan TA, Thompson CS, Pfingst BE. Efficacy of a cochlear implant simultaneous analog stimulation strategy coupled with a monopolar electrode configuration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006;114:886-93. [PMID: 16363059 DOI: 10.1177/000348940511401113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
41
Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Shannon RV. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005;7:15-25. [PMID: 16270234 PMCID: PMC2504584 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-0019-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2005] [Revised: 09/28/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]  Open
42
Wardrop P, Whinney D, Rebscher SJ, Roland JT, Luxford W, Leake PA. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes. Hear Res 2005;203:54-67. [PMID: 15855030 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2004] [Accepted: 11/14/2004] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
43
Drennan WR, Pfingst BE. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2005;202:170-9. [PMID: 15811709 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2004] [Accepted: 11/17/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
44
Laneau J, Wouters J. Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2004;5:285-94. [PMID: 15148651 PMCID: PMC2504550 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4049-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2003] [Accepted: 03/26/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]  Open
45
Speech Perception with Cochlear Implants. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS: AUDITORY PROSTHESES AND ELECTRIC HEARING 2004. [DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-22585-2_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
46
Zeng FG. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2004;8:1-34. [PMID: 15247993 PMCID: PMC4111484 DOI: 10.1177/108471380400800102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
47
Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Nourski KV, Hu N, Robinson BK. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties. Hear Res 2003;175:200-14. [PMID: 12527139 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00739-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
48
Xu L, Tsai Y, Pfingst BE. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2002;112:247-58. [PMID: 12141350 PMCID: PMC1414789 DOI: 10.1121/1.1487843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
49
Skinner MW, Holden LK, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Psarros C, Holden TA. Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear Hear 2002;23:207-23. [PMID: 12072613 DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200206000-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
50
Fallon JB, Irvine DRF, Shepherd RK. Cochlear implants and brain stem implants. Br Med Bull 2002;63:183-93. [PMID: 12324393 PMCID: PMC1988843 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/63.1.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA