1
|
Sanmartin D, Tamayo C, Orozco LE, Ordóñez A, Huertas J, Ávila D, Echeverry J, Caicedo M, García P. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment for Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients in Colombia. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 42:100983. [PMID: 38663057 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate cost-effective pharmacological treatment in adult kidney transplant recipients from the perspective of the Colombian health system. METHODS A decision tree model for the induction phase and a Markov model for the maintenance phase were built. A review of the clinical literature was conducted to extract probabilities, and the life-years were used as the outcome. Costs were calculated using the administrative databases. The evaluating treatment schemes are organized by groups of evidence with direct comparisons. RESULTS In the induction phase, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin+ methylprednisolone is dominant, more effective, and less expensive, compared with basiliximab+methylprednisolone. In the maintenance phase, azathioprine (AZA) is dominant in contrast to mycophenolate mofetil (MFM) both with cyclosporine (CIC)+ corticosteroids (CE); CIC is dominant relative to sirolimus (SIR) and tacrolimus (TAC) (both with MFM+CE or AZA+CE), and TAC is dominant compared with SIR (in addition with MFM+CE or mycophenolate sodium [MFS]+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to MFS and everolimus, and SIR is more effective MFM but it does not exceed the threshold (in sum with TAC+CE); MFS and MFM are dominant relative to everolimus, and SIR is more effective than MFM, but it does not exceed the threshold (in addiction with CIC+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to TAC (in sum with SIR+CE), and CIC+AZA+CE is dominant in relation to TAC+MFM+CE. CONCLUSIONS The base-case results for all evidence groups are consistent with the different sensitivity analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Camilo Tamayo
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - Luis Esteban Orozco
- Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia; Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá DC, Colombia.
| | - Angélica Ordóñez
- Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - Juliana Huertas
- Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - Diego Ávila
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá DC, Colombia; Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - Johanna Echeverry
- Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - Mónica Caicedo
- Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - Paola García
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá DC, Colombia; Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá DC, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arghide Y, Faraji A, Raygani AAV, Salari N, Omrani H, Mohammadi MM. The effect of hemodialysis with cool dialysate on nausea in hemodialysis patients: A randomized clinical trial. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1709. [PMID: 38028679 PMCID: PMC10662658 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Experiencing nausea leads to decreased self-esteem and social isolation in hemodialysis patients and affects all aspects of their quality of life. Nausea and vomiting make hemodialysis unpleasant for patients leading to premature termination of hemodialysis. Therefore, based on this necessity, the present study was conducted to determine the effect of hemodialysis with cool dialysate on nausea in hemodialysis patients. Methods In this clinical trial, 60 eligible patients receiving hemodialysis were randomly assigned to the control (30 participants) and intervention (30 participants) groups. In the control group, the patients received standard hemodialysis (37°C) for three sessions. Simultaneously, patients in the intervention group received hemodialysis with a cold solution (of 36°C) for three sessions. The patients' nausea and shivering rates were measured using the visual analog scale and the shivering standard assessment scale, respectively. Both groups were evaluated before and after 1 week of intervention. The study did not include blinding. The trial has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the number IRCT20200530047597N1. The present study was financially supported by Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran (no. 990220). Data were analyzed using SPSS-25 software. Findings The independent t test showed no statistically significant difference between the two control and experimental groups regarding the nausea rate in the three evaluation times (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, nausea severity decreased significantly after the intervention in the two groups. However, the rate of nausea in the intervention group with cold solution decreased more compared to the control group. Moreover, no patient in the intervention group experienced shivering during hemodialysis with a cool dialysate. Conclusion According to the results of this study, it can be stated that the use of cold hemodialysis to control nausea in patients undergoing hemodialysis requires further studies and can be recommended as a nonpharmacological treatment to manage the treatment costs in case of efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasem Arghide
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
| | - Azam Faraji
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
| | | | - Nader Salari
- Department of Biostatistics, School of HealthKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
| | - Hamidreza Omrani
- Imam Reza Hospital Research CenterKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alsaqa'aby M, Alissa D, Hussein M, Almudaiheem HY, Al-Jedai A. Cost-Utility of Immunosuppressive Therapy Post-Renal Transplantation in Saudi Arabia: The Saudi Ministry of Health Perspective. Value Health Reg Issues 2023; 33:56-64. [PMID: 36244306 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chronic kidney disease is ranked fourth among the top 10 causes of death in Saudi Arabia. Renal transplantation has been recognized as the treatment of choice compared with long-term dialysis to maintain graft survival and prolong a patient's healthy living. Immunosuppressants (ISs) must be administered lifelong. The choice between IS therapies can be challenging because of the similarity in efficacy with some differences in adverse events profile. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of different IS regimens in Saudi Arabia. METHODS A 25-year Markov model was developed based on a previously published study from the Saudi Ministry of Health payer perspective. Efficacy parameters were driven from the literature, whereas cost data were estimated from the Ministry of Health database. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to test the base-case model results' robustness. RESULTS All comparators resulted in 6.2 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) except for Advagraf® treatment (5.5 QALYs). Generic tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) will cost 70 701.45 US dollars ($) (Saudi riyal 265 130.44) per patient to gain 6.2 QALYs over 25 years' time horizon. In the improved adherence scenario, Envarsus® plus generic MMF generated 9.6 QALYs with a cost of $59 849 per patient. Monte Carlo simulation results have shown that generic tacrolimus is still the cheapest treatment option compared with other treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS The current analysis suggested that all IS options are not cost-effective strategies relative to the willingness-to-pay threshold of $20 000. Nevertheless, Envarsus plus generic MMF regimen could become the most cost-effective regimen at different willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Alsaqa'aby
- Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dema Alissa
- Therapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Al-Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Hussein
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ahmed Al-Jedai
- Therapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Al-Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The effect of self-care education through teach back method on the quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Ther 2020; 16:197-200. [PMID: 32532600 DOI: 10.1016/j.nephro.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-care education can play an important role in improving the quality of life in hemodialysis patients. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of self-care education with teach back method on the quality of life in hemodialysis patients. METHODS In this pre- and post-test clinical trial, 45 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis at Sina hospital in Tehran were included. Patient education was done with teach back method. The duration of training were 3 sessions and the time of each session lasted from 45 minutes to one hour. To collect data from patients, a demographic questionnaire was used and to assess the quality of life of patients, kidney disease quality of life-short form before and after education was used. A significant level of 5% was determined. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 58.49±9.97 years. Among the dimensions of quality of life before education, the highest score was for physical role (64.24±7.68) and the lowest was related to job status (28.33±11.06). After training, the most score was related to emotional role (71.15±2.84) and the least was related to job status (43.87±11.54). A significant difference between the quality of life at before and after education was seen (P=0.000). CONCLUSION This study showed that self-care education through teach back method improves the quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, it is recommended that nurses in the hemodialysis unit implement self-care education through teach back method as an important task.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin YC, Tsai CS, Li IH, Tsai YT, Huang TY, Lee KF, Lin CS, Shih JH, Kao LT. Transplant Recipients Using Tacrolimus Had Higher Utilization of Healthcare Services Than Those Receiving Cyclosporine in Taiwan. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:1074. [PMID: 31607922 PMCID: PMC6761300 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
To date, population-based studies on the healthcare service utilization among stable heart, kidney, and liver transplant recipients with different calcineurin inhibitors are still scarce. Therefore, we used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to conduct a nationwide cross-sectional study to estimate the healthcare utilization of stable transplant recipients with tacrolimus or cyclosporine (n = 3,482). The sampled patients in this study comprised 377 heart, 1,693 kidney, and 1,412 liver transplant recipients between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2011. Each subject was followed for a 1-year period to evaluate his/her healthcare service utilization. Outcome variables of the healthcare service utilization were stated as below: numbers of outpatient visits, outpatient costs, numbers of inpatient days, inpatients costs, and total costs of all healthcare services. As for all healthcare service utilization, stable transplant recipients on tacrolimus had significantly more outpatient visits (40.7 vs. 38.6), outpatient costs (US$10,383 vs. US$8,155), and total costs (US$12,516 vs. US$10,372) of all healthcare services than those on cyclosporine during the 1-year follow-up period. Additionally, further analysis showed that heart transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus incurred 1.7-fold higher inpatient costs compared to patients receiving cyclosporine. We concluded that transplant recipients using tacrolimus had significantly higher utilization of all healthcare services than those receiving cyclosporine as immunosuppressive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chang Lin
- Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.,Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Sung Tsai
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsun Li
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ting Tsai
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tien-Yu Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kwai-Fong Lee
- Biobank Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Sheng Lin
- Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Hu Shih
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ting Kao
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Last Year Before Graft Failure Negatively Impacts Economic Outcomes and is Associated With Greater Healthcare Resource Utilization Compared With Previous Years in the United Kingdom: Results of a Retrospective Observational Study. Transplant Direct 2019; 5:e443. [PMID: 31165078 PMCID: PMC6511438 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Kidney and liver transplantation is the standard of care for end-stage renal or liver disease. However, long-term survival of kidney and liver grafts remain suboptimal. Our study aimed to understand the healthcare resources utilized and their associated costs in the years before graft failure. Methods. Two noninterventional, retrospective, observational studies were conducted in cohorts of kidney or liver transplant patients. Once identified, patients were followed using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics databases from the date of transplantation to the date of the first graft failure. Total healthcare costs in the year before graft failure (primary endpoint) and during years 2–5 before graft failure (secondary endpoint) were collected. Results. A total of 269 kidney and 81 liver transplant patients were analyzed. The mean total costs were highest for all resource components in the last year before graft failure, except for mean costs of immunosuppressive therapy per patient, which decreased slightly by index date (ie, graft failure). The mean total healthcare costs in the last year before graft failure were £8115 for kidney and £9988 for liver transplant patients and were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than years 2–5 before graft failure. Mean healthcare costs for years 2, 3, 4, and 5 before graft failure were £5925, £5575, £5469, and £5468, respectively, for kidney, and £6763, £7042, £6020, and £5651, respectively, for liver transplant patients. Conclusions. Total healthcare costs in the last year before graft failure are substantial and statistically significantly higher than years 2–5 before graft failure, in both kidney and liver transplant patients. Our findings show the economic burden placed on healthcare services in the years before graft failure.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hemmati Maslakpak M, Torabi M, Radfar M, Alinejad V. The Effect of Psycho-educational Intervention on the Caregiver burden among Caregivers of Hemodialysis Patients. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT IN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY 2019. [DOI: 10.29252/jgbfnm.16.1.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
|
8
|
Jones-Hughes T, Snowsill T, Haasova M, Coelho H, Crathorne L, Cooper C, Mujica-Mota R, Peters J, Varley-Campbell J, Huxley N, Moore J, Allwood M, Lowe J, Hyde C, Hoyle M, Bond M, Anderson R. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-594. [PMID: 27578428 DOI: 10.3310/hta20620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival. OBJECTIVES To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation. METHODS Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death. RESULTS Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled. FUTURE WORK High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome. CONCLUSION Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Jones-Hughes
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Marcela Haasova
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Louise Crathorne
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ruben Mujica-Mota
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jaime Peters
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Varley-Campbell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicola Huxley
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jason Moore
- Exeter Kidney Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Matt Allwood
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jenny Lowe
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Hyde
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Mary Bond
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rob Anderson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haasova M, Snowsill T, Jones-Hughes T, Crathorne L, Cooper C, Varley-Campbell J, Mujica-Mota R, Coelho H, Huxley N, Lowe J, Dudley J, Marks S, Hyde C, Bond M, Anderson R. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-324. [PMID: 27557331 DOI: 10.3310/hta20610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation followed by induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival. OBJECTIVES To systematically review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) and rabbit antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin (Thymoglobuline,(®) Sanofi) as induction therapy and immediate-release tacrolimus [Adoport(®) (Sandoz); Capexion(®) (Mylan); Modigraf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Perixis(®) (Accord Healthcare); Prograf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Tacni(®) (Teva); Vivadex(®) (Dexcel Pharma)], prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf,(®) Astellas Pharma); belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix,(®) Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) [Arzip(®) (Zentiva), CellCept(®) (Roche Products), Myfenax(®) (Teva), generic MMF is manufactured by Accord Healthcare, Actavis, Arrow Pharmaceuticals, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Mylan, Sandoz and Wockhardt], mycophenolate sodium, sirolimus (Rapamune,(®) Pfizer) and everolimus (Certican,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as maintenance therapy in children and adolescents undergoing renal transplantation. DATA SOURCES Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted to 7 January 2015 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science [via Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)], Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted to 15 January 2015 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Databases (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and EconLit (via EBSCOhost). REVIEW METHODS Titles and abstracts were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria, as were full texts of identified studies. Included studies were extracted and quality appraised. Data were meta-analysed when appropriate. A new discrete time state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed; graft function, and incidences of acute rejection and new-onset diabetes mellitus were used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death. RESULTS Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four non-RCTs were included. The RCTs only evaluated BAS and tacrolimus (TAC). No statistically significant differences in key outcomes were found between BAS and placebo/no induction. Statistically significantly higher graft function (p < 0.01) and less biopsy-proven acute rejection (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.57) was found between TAC and ciclosporin (CSA). Only one cost-effectiveness study was identified, which informed NICE guidance TA99. BAS [with TAC and azathioprine (AZA)] was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) versus no induction (BAS was dominant). BAS (with CSA and MMF) was not predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus no induction (BAS was dominated). TAC (with AZA) was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus CSA (TAC was dominant). A model based on adult evidence suggests that at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000-30,000 per QALY, BAS and TAC are cost-effective in all considered combinations; MMF was also cost-effective with CSA but not TAC. LIMITATIONS The RCT evidence is very limited; analyses comparing all interventions need to rely on adult evidence. CONCLUSIONS TAC is likely to be cost-effective (vs. CSA, in combination with AZA) at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. Analysis based on one RCT found BAS to be dominant, but analysis based on another RCT found BAS to be dominated. BAS plus TAC and AZA was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY when all regimens were compared using extrapolated adult evidence. High-quality primary effectiveness research is needed. The UK Renal Registry could form the basis for a prospective primary study. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013544. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research HTA programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Haasova
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tracey Jones-Hughes
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Louise Crathorne
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Varley-Campbell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ruben Mujica-Mota
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicola Huxley
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jenny Lowe
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jan Dudley
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust), Bristol, UK
| | - Stephen Marks
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Hyde
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Mary Bond
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rob Anderson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaier K, Hils S, Fetzer S, Hehn P, Schmid A, Hauschke D, Bogatyreva L, Jänigen B, Pisarski P. Results of a randomized controlled trial analyzing telemedically supported case management in the first year after living donor kidney transplantation - a budget impact analysis from the healthcare perspective. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2017; 7:1. [PMID: 28092012 PMCID: PMC5236052 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-016-0141-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED ᅟ: We analyze one-year costs and savings of a telemedically supported case management program after kidney transplantation from the perspective of the German Healthcare System. Recipients of living donor kidney transplantation (N = 46) were randomly allocated to either (1) standard aftercare or (2) standard aftercare plus additional telemedically supported case management. A range of cost figures of each patient's medical service utilization were calculated at month 3, 6 and 12 and analyzed using two-part regression models. In comparison to standard aftercare, patients receiving telemedically supported case management are associated with substantial lower costs related to unscheduled hospitalizations (mean difference: €3,417.46 per patient for the entire one-year period, p = 0.003). Taking all cost figures into account, patients receiving standard aftercare are associated, on average, with one-year medical service utilization costs of €10,449.28, while patients receiving telemedically supported case management are associated with €5,504.21 of costs (mean difference: € 4,945.07 per patient, p < 0.001). With estimated expenditures of €3,001.5 for telemedically supported case management of a single patient, we determined a mean difference of €1,943.57, but this result is not statistically significant (p = 0.128). Sensitivity analyses show that the program becomes cost-neutral at around ten participating patients, and was beneficial starting at 15 patients. Routine implementation of telemedically supported case management in German medium and high-volume transplant centers would result in annual cost savings of €791,033 for the German healthcare system. Patients with telemedically supported case management showed a lower utilization of medical services as well as better medical outcomes. Therefore, such programs should be implemented in medium and high-volume transplant centers. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS00007634 ( http://www.drks.de/DRKS00007634 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Kaier
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Silvia Hils
- Transplantation Center, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fetzer
- Faculty of Economics, Aalen University, Beethovenstraße 1, 73430 Aalen, Germany
| | - Philip Hehn
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Schmid
- Transplantation Center, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dieter Hauschke
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lioudmila Bogatyreva
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Jänigen
- Transplantation Center, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Przemyslaw Pisarski
- Transplantation Center, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tremblay S, Alloway RR. Clinical Evaluation of Modified Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations. AAPS JOURNAL 2017; 19:1332-1347. [PMID: 28717926 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0119-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The science of drug delivery has evolved considerably and has led to the development of multiple sustained release formulations. Each of these formulations can present particular challenges in terms of clinical evaluation and necessitate careful study to identify their optimal use in practice. Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is widely used in organ transplant recipients. However, it is poorly soluble, has an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile subject to important genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions, and has a narrow therapeutic index. For these reasons, it represents an agent that could benefit from modified release formulations to overcome these limitations. The objective of this review is to discuss the clinical evaluation of immediate and modified release tacrolimus formulations in renal transplant recipients. Clinical trials from early development of immediate release tacrolimus to formulation-specific post-marketing trials of modified release tacrolimus formulations are reviewed with an emphasis on key elements relating to trial design end endpoint assessment. Particular elements that can be addressed with formulation alterations, such as pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, and toxicity and corresponding clinical evaluations are discussed. In addition, current knowledge gaps in the clinical evaluation of immediate and modified release tacrolimus formulations are discussed to highlight potential avenues for the future development of different tacrolimus formulations with outcomes relevant to the regulators, the transplant community, and to transplant recipients. This review shows that new formulations may alter tacrolimus bioavailability, alleviate certain adverse events while potentially enhancing patient convenience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Tremblay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML0519, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA. .,Department of Environmental Health, Division of Epidemiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML0519, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
| | - Rita R Alloway
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Kidney C.A.R.E Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Desai VCA, Ferrand Y, Cavanaugh TM, Kelton CML, Caro JJ, Goebel J, Heaton PC. Comparative Effectiveness of Tacrolimus-Based Steroid Sparing versus Steroid Maintenance Regimens in Kidney Transplantation: Results from Discrete Event Simulation. Med Decis Making 2017; 37:827-843. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x17700879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background. Corticosteroids used as immunosuppressants to prevent acute rejection (AR) and graft loss (GL) following kidney transplantation are associated with serious cardiovascular and other adverse events. Evidence from short-term randomized controlled trials suggests that many patients on a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressant regimen can withdraw from steroids without increased AR or GL risk. Objectives. To measure the long-term tradeoff between GL and adverse events for a heterogeneous-risk population and determine the optimal timing of steroid withdrawal. Methods. A discrete event simulation was developed including, as events, AR, GL, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cytomegalovirus, and new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), among others. Data from the United States Renal Data System were used to estimate event-specific parametric regressions, which accounted for steroid-sparing regimen (avoidance, early 7-d withdrawal, 6-mo withdrawal, 12-mo withdrawal, and maintenance) as well as patients’ demographics, immunologic risks, and comorbidities. Regression-equation results were used to derive individual time-to-event Weibull distributions, used, in turn, to simulate the course of patients over 20 y. Results. Patients on steroid avoidance or an early-withdrawal regimen were more likely to experience AR (45.9% to 55.0% v. 33.6%, P < 0.05) and GL (51.5% to 68.8% v. 37.8%, P < 0.05) compared to patients on steroid maintenance. Patients in 6-mo and 12-mo steroid withdrawal groups were less likely to experience MI (11.1% v. 13.3%, P < 0.05), NODM (30.7% to 34.4% v. 37.7%, P < 0.05), and cardiac death (29.9% to 30.5% v. 32.4%, P < 0.05), compared to steroid maintenance. Conclusions. Strategies of 6- and 12-mo steroid withdrawal post-kidney transplantation are expected to reduce the rates of adverse cardiovascular events and other outcomes with no worsening of AR or GL rates compared with steroid maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibha C. A. Desai
- Researcher, HealthCore, Andover, MA, USA (VCAD)
- Assistant Professor of Operations Management, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (YF)
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (TMC)
- Professor of Economics, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, and Adjunct Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (CMLK)
- Chief Scientist, Evidera, and Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada (JJC)
| | - Yann Ferrand
- Researcher, HealthCore, Andover, MA, USA (VCAD)
- Assistant Professor of Operations Management, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (YF)
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (TMC)
- Professor of Economics, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, and Adjunct Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (CMLK)
- Chief Scientist, Evidera, and Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada (JJC)
| | - Teresa M. Cavanaugh
- Researcher, HealthCore, Andover, MA, USA (VCAD)
- Assistant Professor of Operations Management, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (YF)
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (TMC)
- Professor of Economics, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, and Adjunct Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (CMLK)
- Chief Scientist, Evidera, and Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada (JJC)
| | - Christina M. L. Kelton
- Researcher, HealthCore, Andover, MA, USA (VCAD)
- Assistant Professor of Operations Management, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (YF)
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (TMC)
- Professor of Economics, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, and Adjunct Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (CMLK)
- Chief Scientist, Evidera, and Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada (JJC)
| | - J. Jaime Caro
- Researcher, HealthCore, Andover, MA, USA (VCAD)
- Assistant Professor of Operations Management, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (YF)
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (TMC)
- Professor of Economics, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, and Adjunct Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (CMLK)
- Chief Scientist, Evidera, and Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada (JJC)
| | - Jens Goebel
- Researcher, HealthCore, Andover, MA, USA (VCAD)
- Assistant Professor of Operations Management, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (YF)
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (TMC)
- Professor of Economics, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, and Adjunct Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (CMLK)
- Chief Scientist, Evidera, and Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada (JJC)
| | - Pamela C. Heaton
- Researcher, HealthCore, Andover, MA, USA (VCAD)
- Assistant Professor of Operations Management, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA (YF)
- Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (TMC)
- Professor of Economics, Carl H. Lindner College of Business, and Adjunct Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA (CMLK)
- Chief Scientist, Evidera, and Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology and of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada (JJC)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Noreikaitė A, Saint-Marcoux F, Marquet P, Kaduševičius E, Stankevičius E. Influence of cyclosporine and everolimus on the main mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetic parameters: Cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e6469. [PMID: 28353583 PMCID: PMC5380267 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of cyclosporine (CsA) on the pharmacokinetic parameters of mycophenolic acid (MPA), an active mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) metabolite, and to compare with the effect of everolimus (EVR).Anonymized medical records of 404 kidney recipients were reviewed. The main MPA pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-12) and Cmax) were evaluated.The patients treated with a higher mean dose of CsA displayed higher MPA AUC(0-12) exposure in the low-dose MMF group (1000 mg/day) (40.50 ± 10.97 vs 28.08 ± 11.03 h mg/L; rs = 0.497, P < 0.05), medium-dose MMF group (2000 mg/day) (43.00 ± 6.27 vs 28.85 ± 11.08 h mg/L; rs = 0.437, P < 0.01), and high-dose MMF group (3000 mg/day) (56.75 ± 16.78 vs 36.20 ± 3.70 h mg/L; rs = 0.608, P < 0.05).A positive correlation was also observed between the mean CsA dose and the MPA Cmax in the low-dose MMF group (Cmax 22.83 ± 10.82 vs 12.08 ± 5.59 mg/L; rs = 0.507, P < 0.05) and in the medium-dose MMF group (22.77 ± 8.86 vs 13.00 ± 6.82 mg/L; rs = 0.414, P < 0.01).The comparative analysis between 2 treatment arms (MMF + CsA and MMF + EVR) showed that MPA AUC(0-12) exposure was by 43% higher in the patients treated with a medium dose of MMF and EVR than in the patients treated with a medium dose of MMF and CsA.The data of the present study suggest a possible CsA versus EVR influence on MMF pharmacokinetics. Study results show that CsA has an impact on the main MPA pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-12) and Cmax) in a CsA dose-related manner, while EVR mildly influence or does not affect MPA pharmacokinetic parameters. Low-dose CsA (lower than 180 mg/day) reduces MPA AUC(0-12) exposure under the therapeutic window and may lead to ineffective therapy, while a high-dose CsA (>240 mg/day) is related to greater than 10 mg/L MPA Cmax and increases the likelihood of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelija Noreikaitė
- Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
| | - Franck Saint-Marcoux
- INSERM UMR 850, Limoges
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU Limoges, Limoges Cedex
- University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Pierre Marquet
- INSERM UMR 850, Limoges
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU Limoges, Limoges Cedex
- University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Edmundas Kaduševičius
- Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
| | - Edgaras Stankevičius
- Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Muduma G, Hart WM, Patel S, Odeyemi AO. Indirect treatment comparison of belatacept versus tacrolimus from a systematic review of immunosuppressive therapies for kidney transplant patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2016; 32:1065-72. [PMID: 26907083 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1157463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE End-stage renal disease is the final and irreversible stage in chronic kidney disease, leading to patient mortality, unless managed by dialysis or transplantation (the treatment of choice). This study aimed to compare a currently recommended immunosuppressive treatment, tacrolimus, against a newer treatment, belatacept, using indirect treatment comparison (ITC) techniques since no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tacrolimus against belatacept currently exist. METHODS ITC was employed to calculate estimates for the relative risks and mean difference of tacrolimus against belatacept. The choice of the Bucher ITC model was driven by the available data and the simple indirect treatment comparison involving three treatments was considered appropriate. RESULTS The results of the indirect analysis showed no significant differences between belatacept and tacrolimus treatments for mortality and graft loss. The acute rejection rate was significantly lower with tacrolimus (Prograf* and Advagraf (*) ) compared with belatacept (0.22 [0.13, 0.39] to 0.44 [0.20, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that tacrolimus is significantly superior to belatacept in terms of acute rejection outcomes but comparable for graft and patient survival. Further research should include a properly designed clinical trial comparing tacrolimus against belatacept directly. LIMITATIONS These include variations in terms of clinical and design differences among the trials, weaknesses in the Bucher method and the lack of long-term clinical trial data with tacrolimus to compare with the recent long-term (7 years) belatacept trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Muduma
- a Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd , Chertsey, Surrey , UK
| | - W M Hart
- b EcoStat Consulting UK Ltd , Norfolk , UK
| | - S Patel
- a Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd , Chertsey, Surrey , UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jürgensen JS, Ikenberg R, Greiner RA, Hösel V. Cost-effectiveness of modern mTOR inhibitor based immunosuppression compared to the standard of care after renal transplantation in Germany. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2015; 16:377-390. [PMID: 24728542 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0579-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2013] [Accepted: 03/14/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Standards of immunosuppression in renal transplantation have changed dynamically in recent years. We here provide a refined advanced pharmacoeconomic model which uses state-of-the-art methods including a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) analysis. The aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of current immunosuppressive therapy regimens (TR): "sirolimus + early withdrawal of cyclosporine + steroids" (TR1), "sirolimus-early transition" (TR2), "everolimus-early transition" (TR3) and "tacrolimus low dose + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroids" (TR4). METHODS An up-to-date Markov model with current source data was employed to assess the cost-effectiveness of modern immunosuppressive regimens over 12-month and 10-year time periods. Transition probabilities for the occurrence of events for the first year were based on an MTC analysis. The robustness of the model was tested in extensive sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Within the 12-month time period TR2 yields the highest life years (0.987 LY), generating costs of 17,500 <euro>. In terms of years with functioning graft (FG), TR4 yields the best efficacy over the 12-month model duration (0.970 years with FG). For the 10-year time period, TR2 yields the lowest costs (107,246 <euro>) and dominates both TR3 and TR1, as it is simultaneously more effective. Within the 10-year model duration, TR4 reaches slightly higher effects compared with TR2 (6.493 vs. 6.474 LY) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 387,684 <euro> per LY gained. CONCLUSIONS The early transition to sirolimus provides long-term efficiency results comparable with a tacrolimus-based regimen, which represents a common treatment standard after kidney transplantation. Both are superior to other investigated immunosuppressive regimens.
Collapse
|
16
|
Guerra AA, Silva GD, Andrade EIG, Cherchiglia ML, Costa JDO, Almeida AM, Acurcio FDA. Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus: cost-effectiveness analysis for renal transplantation in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 2015; 49:13. [PMID: 25741648 PMCID: PMC4386555 DOI: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2014] [Accepted: 11/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the cost-effectiveness of treatment regimens with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, five years after renal transplantation. METHODS This cost-effectiveness analysis was based on historical cohort data obtained between 2000 and 2004 and involved 2,022 patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, matched 1:1 for gender, age, and type and year of transplantation. Graft survival and the direct costs of medical care obtained from the National Health System (SUS) databases were used as outcome results. RESULTS Most of the patients were women, with a mean age of 36.6 years. The most frequent diagnosis of chronic renal failure was glomerulonephritis/nephritis (27.7%). In five years, the tacrolimus group had an average life expectancy gain of 3.96 years at an annual cost of R$78,360.57 compared with the cyclosporine group with a gain of 4.05 years and an annual cost of R$61,350.44. CONCLUSIONS After matching, the study indicated better survival of patients treated with regimens using tacrolimus. Moreover, regimens containing cyclosporine were more cost-effective [corrected].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Afonso Guerra
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
- Departamento de Farmácia Social. Faculdade de Farmácia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Grazielle Dias Silva
- Superintendência de Assistência Farmacêutica. Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Eli Iola Gurgel Andrade
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Juliana de Oliveira Costa
- Departamento de Farmácia Social. Faculdade de Farmácia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Alessandra Maciel Almeida
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Francisco de Assis Acurcio
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
- Departamento de Farmácia Social. Faculdade de Farmácia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Muduma G, Shaw J, Hart WM, Odeyemi A, Odeyemi I. Cost utility analysis of immunosuppressive regimens in adult renal transplant recipients in England and Wales. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014; 8:1537-46. [PMID: 25395839 PMCID: PMC4226454 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s69461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease is the irreversible final stage of chronic kidney disease and is fatal when not managed by either transplantation or dialysis. Transplantation is generally preferred over dialysis. However, to prevent graft rejection or loss, lifelong immunosuppression is required. Tacrolimus is currently the cornerstone of post-transplantation immunosuppression. The study aim was to carry out an economic evaluation of immunosuppression, including more recent agents such as a once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf™) and belatacept, relative to a twice-daily immediate-release formulation of tacrolimus (Prograf™). METHODS A MODEL WAS CONSTRUCTED COMPRISING SIX STATES: onset of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, functioning graft with or without a biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, non-functioning graft (dialysis), re-transplantation, and death. Data on clinical effectiveness were derived from a systematic literature review and the model captured the effects of patient adherence to immunosuppressant therapy on graft survival using relative risk of graft survival and published data on adherence in patients using Advagraf and Prograf. In the base case, the time horizon was 25 years and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS The analysis demonstrated that Prograf was cost-effective when compared with cyclosporin and belatacept and was more effective than sirolimus, but would not be considered cost-effective against sirolimus. The modeled improvement in the adherence profile of patients using Advagraf relative to Prograf resulted in both improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs. CONCLUSION Prograf was more clinically effective than cyclosporin, belatacept, and sirolimus, supporting its current positioning as the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients. Based on improved patient adherence with Advagraf, the model projected that Advagraf would be both more effective and less costly than Prograf. Replacing Prograf with Advagraf as the standard of care for post-transplant immunosuppression could likely result in both cost savings and improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jane Shaw
- Astellas Pharma Limited, Chertsey, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to describe the healthcare resource utilization and costs of managing renal posttransplant patients over 3 years posttransplant in nine European countries and to stratify them by year 1 glomerular filtration rate (GFR). METHODS A retrospective observational and database analysis of renal transplant patients and a physician questionnaire study were conducted to collect recipient and donor characteristics, posttransplant events, and healthcare resource utilization related to these posttransplant events. In each country, local published costs were applied to the resource use identified. The results were stratified by the patient GFR reading at a time point 1 year after renal transplant. RESULTS The database study identified 3,181 patients who met the inclusion criteria, along with 2,818 transplants carried out in the centers surveyed by questionnaire. Total 3-year costs derived from the questionnaire analysis vary depending on local treatment practices, from a minimum of &OV0556;33,602 per patient in the Czech Republic to &OV0556;77,461 per patient in the Netherlands. Consistently across countries, estimated costs appear to decrease with improved graft functioning status (increased GFR) at 1 year. The average 3-year costs, discounting immunosuppression therapy and certain posttransplant events, per patient with a GFR greater than or equal to 60 at 1 year are estimated to be around 35% lower than those with 15≤GFR<30. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that in Europe, worsening posttransplant renal function may contribute to substantive increases in resource use, with some variation across regions. Therefore, management strategies that promote renal function after transplantation have the potential to provide important resource savings.
Collapse
|
19
|
Acurcio FDA, Saturnino LTM, Silva ALD, Oliveira GLAD, Andrade EIG, Cherchiglia ML, Ceccato MDGB. Análise de custo-efetividade dos imunossupressores utilizados no tratamento de manutenção do transplante renal em pacientes adultos no Brasil. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2013; 29 Suppl 1:S92-109. [DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00006913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2013] [Accepted: 07/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
O objetivo do estudo foi realizar análise custoefetividade de imunossupressores utilizados na terapia de manutenção pós-transplante renal. Coorte hipotética de adultos transplantados foi acompanhada por 20 anos, empregando-se modelo de Markov. Os 10 esquemas terapêuticos avaliados continham prednisona (P). O custo médio dos medicamentos foi obtido na Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos. Outros custos assistenciais compuseram cada estágio da doença. O custo foi expresso em reais, a efetividade em anos de vida ganhos e adotou-se a perspectiva do sistema público de saúde. Ao fim do acompanhamento, a análise com desconto mostrou que todos os esquemas foram dominados por ciclosporina(CSA)+azatioprina(AZA) +P. Nas demais análises, tacrolimo+AZA+P não foi dominado, mas a relação custo-efetividade incremental entre estes dois esquemas foi de R$ 156.732,07/ anos de vida ganhos, na análise sem desconto, valor que ultrapassa o limiar de três vezes o PIB per capita brasileiro. Nenhuma alteração qualitativa foi demonstrada pela análise de sensibilidade e a probabilidade do esquema CSA+AZA+P ser o mais custo-efetivo é superior a 85%.
Collapse
|
20
|
Scheuringer M, Sahakyan N, Krobot KJ, Ulrich V. Cost of clinical events in health economic evaluations in Germany: a systematic review. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2012; 10:7. [PMID: 22651885 PMCID: PMC3495193 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2011] [Accepted: 04/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Guidance from the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) on cost estimation in cost-benefit assessments in Germany acknowledges the need for standardization of costing methodology. The objective of this review was to assess current methods for deriving clinical event costs in German economic evaluations. A systematic literature search of 24 databases (including MEDLINE, BIOSIS, the Cochrane Library and Embase) identified articles, published between January 2005 and October 2009, which reported cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analyses. Studies assessed German patients and evaluated at least one of 11 predefined clinical events relevant to patients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 21 articles, describing 199 clinical cost events, met the inclusion criteria. Year of costing and time horizon were available for 194 (97%) and 163 (82%) cost events, respectively. Cost components were rarely specified (32 [16%]). Costs were generally based on a single literature source (140 [70%]); where multiple sources were cited (32 [16%]), data synthesis methodology was not reported. Cost ranges for common events, assessed using a Markov model with a cycle length of 12 months, were: acute myocardial infarction (nine studies), first year, 4,618-17,556 €; follow-up years, 1,006-3,647 €; and stroke (10 studies), first year; 10,149-24,936 €; follow-up years, 676-7,337 €. These results demonstrate that costs for individual clinical events vary substantially in German health economic evaluations, and that there is a lack of transparency and consistency in the methods used to derive them. The validity and comparability of economic evaluations would be improved by guidance on standardizing costing methodology for individual clinical events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Narine Sahakyan
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Public Health Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT- University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Karl J Krobot
- Outcomes Research Department, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Haar, Germany
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT- University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Volker Ulrich
- Department of Law and Economics, Institute of Public Finance, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gamboa O, Montero C, Mesa L, Benavides C, Reino A, Torres R, Castillo J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Early Conversion of Tacrolimus to Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors in Patients with Renal Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:3367-76. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.09.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
22
|
[Diagnosis-related groups for kidney transplantation]. Urologe A 2009; 48:1473-7. [PMID: 19890621 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-009-2162-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Renal transplantation is a cost-effective form of renal replacement therapy which prolongs life and improves the quality of life. The representation in the German DRG system is, however, not cost-covering in all cases. Cost-effectiveness must also be considered in view of long-term transplant survival which relates to overall costs to the health care system and goes beyond hospital costs.
Collapse
|