Early evaluation of bowel symptoms after primary repair of obstetric perineal rupture is misleading: an observational cohort study

Postpartum anal incontinence in women with and without obstetric anal sphincter injuries

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Postpartum anal incontinence is common and distressing for women. We sought to look at the prevalence of anal incontinence in women who sustained obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) compared with women who did not, and factors leading to these symptoms during the postpartum period.

METHODS

A total of 129 primiparous women sustaining OASI were compared with 131 women who did not (controls). They were contacted at approximately 6-10 weeks postpartum to obtain information on their symptoms of anal incontinence (AI). The data underwent univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the prevalence of AI symptoms, occurring in 30% of women with OASI, and 23% of women without at 6-10 weeks postpartum; however, in women with high-grade tears the prevalence was 59%. Severe OASI (grade 3c and 4) was associated with an increased prevalence of both AI and severe AI, whereas forceps delivery and increasing maternal age were associated with an increased prevalence of severe AI only.

CONCLUSION

Women with less severe (grade 3a and 3b) OASI do not experience a higher prevalence of AI than women without OASI in the postpartum period. Higher grade (3c and 4) tears, forceps delivery and increasing maternal age are associated with higher rates of AI. These factors should be avoided where possible to reduce postpartum AI. All women should be warned of the 23-30% chance of experiencing some mild AI in this period. Whether these symptoms are transient or long-lasting requires further investigation.

Do pelvic floor muscle exercises reduce postpartum anal incontinence? A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) for postpartum anal incontinence (AI).

DESIGN

A parallel two-armed randomised controlled trial stratified on obstetrical anal sphincter injury with primary sphincter repair and hospital affinity.

SETTING

Ano-rectal specialist out-patient clinics at two hospitals in Norway.

POPULATION

One hundred and nine postpartum women with AI at baseline.

METHODS

The intervention group received 6 months of individual physiotherapy-led PFME and the control group written information on PFME. Changes in St. Mark's scores and predictors of post-intervention AI were assessed by independent samples t-tests and multiple linear regression analyses, respectively. The study was not blind.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was change in AI symptoms on the St. Mark's score from baseline to post-intervention. Secondary outcome measures were manometry measures of anal sphincter length and strength, endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) defect score and voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the reduction of St. Mark's scores from baseline to post-intervention in favour of the PFME group (-2.1 versus -0.8 points, P = 0.040). No differences in secondary outcome measures were found between groups. Baseline St. Mark's, PFME group affinity and EAUS defect score predicted post-intervention St. Mark's score in the imputed intention-to-treat analyses. The analysis on un-imputed data showed that women performing weekly PFME improved their AI scores more than women in the control group did.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that individually adapted PFME reduces postpartum AI symptoms.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Performing regular pelvic floor muscle exercises may be an effective treatment for postpartum anal incontinence.

[Predictive factors of 2-month postpartum anal incontinence among patients with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury]

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence of short-term postpartum anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study including every patient with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury between January 2006 and December 2012 in one tertiary maternity unit. Patients were interviewed and examined at 2-month postpartum. Anal incontinence was defined by the presence of at least one of the following symptoms: flatus incontinence, faecal incontinence and faecal urgency.

RESULTS

Among 17,110 patients who delivered vaginally during period study, 134 (0.8%) presented an anal sphincter injury. Postpartum obstetrical data were available for 110 of them. Among those patients, 50 women (45.5%) had at least one symptom of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum and 8 (7.3%) had faecal incontinence. Only maternal age and second stage duration were significantly associated with anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury. The degree of sphincter damage at delivery (IIIa, b, c, IV) was not associated with the risk of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age and second stage duration were the only risk factor for anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury in this study. High prevalence of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is observed no matter what is the degree of anal sphincter damage. Our results highlight the importance to diagnose all obstetrical anal sphincter injuries whatever the degree of damage.

Prevalence and predictors of anal incontinence during pregnancy and 1 year after delivery: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of anal incontinence (AI) in late pregnancy and 1 year after delivery.

DESIGN

Prospective population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Two maternity units in Norway 2009-2010.

POPULATION

Primiparae aged 18 years or over.

METHODS

Primiparae answered questions on the St. Mark's score about AI during the last 4 weeks of pregnancy. One year later, the same questionnaires were distributed by postal mail. Socio-economic and delivery-related data were obtained from hospital records.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported AI.

RESULTS

Answers on AI in late pregnancy were obtained from 1571 women, and 1030 responded 1 year later. Twenty-four per cent experienced one and 4.7% experienced three or more AI symptoms in late pregnancy. One year later, this was reduced to 19% and 2.2%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied. Formed and loose stool incontinence were strongly associated at both time points. The main predictor of AI 1 year after delivery was AI in late pregnancy. Obstetric anal sphincter injury increased the risk of incontinence of stool and flatus (odds ratio [OR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-9.6) after delivery. Urgency was associated with greater age (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.3) and operative delivery (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9).

CONCLUSION

One in four primiparae experienced AI in late pregnancy. One year later, still one in five suffered from incontinence. Sphincter injury predicted incontinence of stool and flatus, whereas greater age and operative delivery predicted urgency. The identification and adequate follow-up of pregnant women with AI may reduce AI after delivery.

Prevalence and risk factors for anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter rupture

OBJECTIVE

To study prevalence and risk factors for anal incontinence (AI) after obstetric anal sphincter rupture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective clinical observational study. Among 14 959 vaginal deliveries, 591 women were diagnosed with obstetric anal sphincter ruptures (3.9%) at one Norwegian University Hospital in 2003-2005. Patients were examined and interviewed approximately 10 months after delivery. Anal continence was classified with St. Mark's incontinence score (0, complete anal continence; ≥3, anal incontinence), and defects in anal sphincter muscles were diagnosed by endoanal ultrasound. Prevalence of anal incontinence was assessed in relation to obstetrical and maternal characteristics as well as the correlation between anal incontinence and ultrasound-detectable defects of sphincter muscle.

RESULTS

Anal incontinence with a St. Mark's score of ≥3 was reported by 21% of women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture, with inability to control gas as the most prevalent symptom. Women with AI were more likely to report urinary incontinence compared with women having no AI. In a multiple regression analysis of maternal and obstetrical risk factors, fourth degree sphincter tear was the only significant risk factor for AI. Anal incontinence was more frequent in patients diagnosed with than without ultrasound-identified anal sphincter muscle defects at 10 months postpartum follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Anal as well as urinary incontinence after delivery with obstetric anal sphincter rupture is common, and prenatal obstetric and maternal variables could not predict anal incontinence. Fourth degree perineal tear and a persistent ultrasound-detected defect in the anal sphincter muscles are associated with AI.

Overlap technique improves results of primary surgery after obstetric anal sphincter tear

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate prospectively the results of the overlap technique in primary sphincter reconstruction after obstetric tear.

METHODS

Obstetric tears in 44 women were operated on with primary overlap reconstruction. These women were investigated six to nine months after the operation. Results were compared with those of a historical control group of 52 women whose obstetric sphincter rupture had been treated with the end-to-end technique.

RESULTS

The overlap group had significantly more incontinence symptoms after delivery and repair of the sphincter tear than before delivery (P < 0.0001); however, their incontinence symptoms were significantly fewer than those of the end-to-end group (P = 0.004). The prevalence of persistent rupture of the external anal sphincter was significantly lower in the overlap group (6/44, 13.6 percent) than in the end-to-end group (39/52, 75 percent; P < 0.0001). Internal anal sphincter rupture occurred in 5 patients (11.4 percent) in the overlap group and in 40 patients (76.9 percent) in the end-to-end group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overlap technique should be adopted as the method of choice for primary sphincter repair after obstetric tear.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Obstetric sphincter damage is the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women. This review aimed to survey the literature, and reach a consensus, on its incidence, risk factors, and management.

METHOD

This systematic review identified relevant studies from the following sources: Medline, Cochrane database, cross referencing from identified articles, conference abstracts and proceedings, and guidelines published by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (United Kingdom), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (United Kingdom), and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

RESULTS

A total of 451 articles and abstracts were reviewed. There was a wide variation in the reported incidence of anal sphincter muscle injury from childbirth, with the true incidence likely to be approximately 11% of postpartum women. Risk factors for injury included instrumental delivery, prolonged second stage of labor, birth weight greater than 4 kg, fetal occipitoposterior presentation, and episiotomy. First vaginal delivery, induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, early pushing, and active restraint of the fetal head during delivery may be associated with an increased risk of sphincter trauma. The majority of sphincter tears can be identified clinically by a suitably trained clinician. In those with recognized tears at the time of delivery repair should be performed using long-term absorbable sutures. Patients presenting later with fecal incontinence may be managed successfully using antidiarrheal drugs and biofeedback. In those who fail conservative treatment, and who have a substantial sphincter disruption, elective repair may be attempted. The results of primary and elective repair may deteriorate with time. Sacral nerve stimulation may be an appropriate alternative treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetric anal sphincter damage, and related fecal incontinence, are common. Risk factors for such trauma are well recognized, and should allow for reduction of injury by proactive management. Improved classification, recognition, and follow-up of at-risk patients should facilitate improved outcome. Further studies are required to determine optimal long-term management.

Biofeedback vs. electrostimulation in the treatment of postdelivery anal incontinence: a randomized, clinical trial

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of biofeedback and electrostimulation in a randomized, clinical trial for the treatment of patients with postdelivery anal incontinence.

METHODS

Forty-nine females who sustained third-degree or fourth-degree perineal rupture with a mean age of 36 (range, 22-44) years were included in the study. The females were randomized to biofeedback or electrostimulation treatment. Forty females completed the study: 19 in the biofeedback and 21 in the electrostimulation group. Biofeedback or electrostimulation sessions were performed two times daily for eight weeks in each group. Wexner incontinence score, fecal incontinence quality of life scores, and reduced quality of life on visual analog scale were registered before and after treatment. Patients' self-rating of treatment effect also was registered in both groups. The primary outcome measure was the Wexner incontinence score.

RESULTS

There were no differences in treatment effect between groups. Comparing pretreatment status to posttreatment in each group showed no improvement in Wexner score, reduced quality of life, or any of the fecal incontinence quality of life scores. Patients' self-rating of the treatment effect, however, showed a subjective improvement of symptoms both in the biofeedback and in the electrostimulation group (median, 7 vs. 5.)

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that there was no difference in effect between biofeedback and electrostimulation. Neither biofeedback nor electrostimulation treatments improved Wexner incontinence score, reduced quality of life, or fecal incontinence quality of life scores. Both treatments resulted in improvement of patients' subjective perception of incontinence control.

Urinary incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)—is there a relationship?

This study aimed to compare urinary symptoms and its impact on women's quality of life after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) with a matched control group in the short term. The study group consisted of 100 primiparous women with OASIS and 104 controls who sustained a second-degree tear or had a mediolateral episiotomy performed. All women completed a validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) questionnaire 10 weeks after delivery. Compared to controls, significantly more women with OASIS reported overall urinary incontinence (21.2 vs 38%, p = 0.005) and had significantly worse quality of life score (incontinence score: 2.42 vs 1.2; p = 0.008). Significantly more women with OASIS suffered from stress urinary incontinence (33 vs 14%; p = 0.002; OR 3.06; CI = 1.54-6.07) than controls. Logistic regression analysis revealed that OASIS and a prolonged (>50 min) second stage of labour were independent risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence. This study highlights the importance of inquiring about urinary incontinence in women with OASIS.

Early results of immediate repair of obstetric third-degree tears: 65% are completely asymptomatic despite persistent sphincter defects in 61%

OBJECTIVE

The outcome of immediate repair of obstetric third-degree tears is poorly documented. Immediate repair may give better functional results than delayed repair because scarring is reduced. This aim of this prospective study was to examine the early outcome of immediate repair of third-degree tears.

METHOD

A total of 121 women who had immediate repair of obstetric third-degree tears underwent interview, anal ultrasonography and anorectal physiology.

RESULTS

At review, 79 (65%) were completely asymptomatic (score = 0), 23 (19%), had minor flatus incontinence or mild urgency causing no compromise to their quality of life (score 1-4), and 19 (16%) had clinically embarrassing faecal incontinence (score 5-24). Thirty-nine (32%) had an intact internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) (i.e. a successful repair), eight (7%) had a defect in the IAS alone but the EAS was intact (i.e. a successful repair but a residual IAS defect), 43 (35%) had a residual defect in the EAS alone (IAS intact) and 31 (26%) had a persistent defect in the IAS and EAS. Residual defects in either or both of the sphincters were associated with a significantly higher incidence of abnormal resting and squeeze anal pressures. Anal manometry had no correlation with symptoms. The highest proportion of severe incontinence was in those with an IAS defect alone (37%) and when there was a residual IAS and EAS defect (24%). Only 2 of 39 (5%) with an intact IAS and EAS had severe incontinence and only 8 of 43 (18%) with a residual EAS defect alone had severe faecal incontinence.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate a good outcome following immediate repair of third-degree obstetric tears and emphasize the role of the IAS in providing continence.

How to repair an anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery: results of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare two surgical techniques and two types of suture material for anal sphincter repair after childbirth-related injury.

DESIGN

Factorial randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referral maternity unit.

POPULATION

Women with an anal sphincter injury sustained during childbirth.

METHOD

Women were randomised into four groups: overlap repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); end-to-end repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); overlap repair with polydioxanone (PDS); and end-to-end repair with PDS. All repairs were completed as a primary procedure by staff trained in both methods.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Suture-related morbidity at six weeks. Bowel symptoms at 3, 6 and 12 months. Anorectal physiology at three months. Quality of life scores at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty women (1.5% of deliveries) were eligible and 112 (75%) were randomised. One hundred and three (92%) attended follow up visit at 6 weeks, 89 (80%) at 3 months, 79 (71%) at 6 months and 60 (54%) at 12 months. At six weeks, there was no difference in suture-related morbidity between groups (P=0.11) and 70% patients were completely asymptomatic. Incidence of bowel symptoms and quality of life disturbances were low, with no differences between the four groups.

CONCLUSION

Obstetric anal sphincter repair carried out by appropriately trained staff is associated with low morbidity, irrespective of the suture material and repair method used.

Combined urinary and faecal incontinence

Combined urinary and faecal (liquid or solid) incontinence (double incontinence) is the most severe and debilitating manifestation of pelvic floor dysfunction. The community prevalence is 9-19% (urinary) and 5-10% (faecal), increasing with age. Pathophysiological factors include childbirth-associated external anal sphincter injury and pudendal nerve damage, pelvic floor descent, menopause, collagen disorders and multiple sclerosis-like conditions. The presence of crossed reflexes between the bladder, urethra, anorectum and pelvic floor in animal studies may explain the comorbidity of urinary and faecal urgency. Surgical treatment is based on aetiology and combined optimum techniques such as colposuspension or suburethral sling with overlapping sphincteroplasty. Other methods for improving sphincteric control include sacral nerve neuromodulation, bulking agents and artificial sphincters.