Outcome after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer

Prospective longitudinal trajectory of cancer survivorship among patients with recurrent rectal cancer: impact of treatment modalities and resection status

AIM

Recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) can be morbid and optimising cancer survivorship is a priority. The longitudinal trajectories of survivorship associated with RRC have not been prospectively depicted.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with RRC. Participants self-reported quality of life (QOL) using validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and CR29, and pain using the Brief Pain Inventory, at baseline and then every 6 months for up to 5 years or until death. Baseline scores and the longitudinal trajectory of scores were examined using linear mixed-effects modelling.

RESULTS

Among 104 patients, 73 (70.2%) received multimodality salvage treatment with curative intent, while the remainder received best palliative treatments. Curative-intent salvage including surgery was associated with a 30-day operative morbidity rate of 49% and a 5-year overall survival of 51%. Patients undergoing curative-intent salvage versus palliative treatments did not differ in baseline QOL or pain, but the longitudinal trajectory after curative-intent salvage showed sustained improvement of QOL and symptoms over time. This contrasted with the initial transient improvement but persistent decline with palliative treatments. Baseline QOL was significantly impacted by the anatomical site of RRC, with posterior location associated with worst QOL (P = 0.012). Long-term QOL was impacted by anatomical site and status of residual tumour. Pain scores were worse among men.

CONCLUSION

Trajectories of cancer survivorship for patients with RRC diverge, mainly influenced by anatomical site of the RCC, residual tumour status, and ability to complete curative-intent salvage. These should inform treatment planning. Optimising selection and success of multimodality therapy remains the cornerstone for durable cancer survivorship.

Improving R0 Resection Rates With a Posterior-First, 2-Stage Approach for En Bloc Resection of Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Anorectal Cancers Involving the Deep Pelvic Sidewall

BACKGROUND

Using standard anterior approaches, consistent R0 resection of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal and anal cancer involving the deep pelvic sidewall may be unattainable. Therefore, to improve R0 resection rates, we have used a posterior-first, then anterior 2-stage approach to resection of tumors in this location.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the R0 resection rate and surgical outcomes of the first 10 patients operated on using this approach.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective case series review of our prospectively maintained surgical pathology and tumor registries.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

PATIENTS

Ten patients (6 female individuals, median age 53.5 years) with primary or recurrent anal or rectal cancer treated with a posterior-first, then anterior 2-stage approach were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were the R0 resection rate and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

An R0 resection was achieved in all 10 patients. Nine patients developed 1 or more 30-day Clavien-Dindo grade III complications. Nine patients developed gluteal wound complications ranging from superficial wound dehiscence to flap necrosis. During the follow-up period, 4 patients were found to have metastatic disease and 1 patient had local re-recurrence.

LIMITATIONS

Small cohort with heterogeneous tumors and a short follow-up duration.

CONCLUSION

A posterior-first, then anterior 2-stage approach has allowed us to achieve consistent R0 resection margins in locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal and anal cancers involving the deep pelvic sidewall. Poor wound healing of the posterior gluteal incision is a common complication. See Video Abstract.

MEJORANDO LAS TASAS DE RESECCIN R CON UN ABORDAJE DE DOS ETAPAS PRIMERO POSTERIOR PARA LA RESECCIN EN BLOQUE DE CNCERES ANORRECTALES PRIMARIOS Y RECURRENTES LOCALMENTE AVANZADOS QUE AFECTAN LA PARED LATERAL PLVICA PROFUNDA

ANTECEDENTES:Utilizando abordajes anteriores estándares, la resección R0 consistente del cáncer de recto y ano primario y recurrente localmente avanzado involucrando la pared lateral pélvica profunda puede ser inalcanzable. Por lo tanto, para mejorar las tasas de resección R0, hemos empleado un abordaje de 2 etapas primero posterior y luego anterior para la resección de tumores en esta ubicación.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la tasa de resección R0 y los resultados quirúrgicos de los primeros 10 pacientes operados con este abordaje.DISEÑO:Realizamos una revisión retrospectiva de series de casos de nuestros registros de patología quirúrgica y tumores mantenidos prospectivamente.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en la Clínica Mayo en Rochester, Minnesota, EE. UU.PACIENTES:Se identificaron diez pacientes (6 mujeres, mediana de edad 53.5 años) con cáncer anal o rectal primario o recurrente tratados con un abordaje de dos etapas, primero posterior y luego anterior.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las medidas de resultado primarias fueron la tasa de resección R0 y los resultados quirúrgicos.RESULTADOS:Se logró una resección R0 en los 10 pacientes. Nueve pacientes desarrollaron una o más complicaciones de grado III de Clavien-Dindo a los 30 días. Nueve pacientes desarrollaron complicaciones de la herida del glúteo que variaron desde dehiscencia superficial de la herida hasta necrosis del colgajo. Durante el período de seguimiento, se encontró que 4 pacientes tenían enfermedad metastásica y un paciente tuvo recurrencia local.LIMITACIONES:Cohorte pequeño con tumores heterogéneos y corta duración de seguimiento.CONCLUSIÓN:Un abordaje en 2 etapas, primero posterior y luego anterior, nos ha permitido lograr márgenes de resección R0 consistentes en cánceres de recto y anal primarios y recurrentes localmente avanzados que afectan la pared lateral pélvica profunda. La mala cicatrización de la incisión glútea posterior es una complicación común. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez).

Clinical Significance of Preoperative and Postoperative Serum CEA and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Levels in Patients Undergoing Curative Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence is common after curative resection for rectal cancer. Although one expects radical resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer to be curative, the postoperative re-recurrence rate is relatively high. Therefore, identifying risk factors for recurrence may improve the prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer with early therapeutic intervention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between perioperative serum CEA/carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels and prognosis in locally recurrent rectal cancer to validate their usefulness for postoperative surveillance in locally recurrent rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The study is based on data obtained from procedures at the Osaka University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Ninety patients underwent radical resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer between January 2000 and January 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We evaluated the correlation between perioperative serum CEA/carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels and prognosis after complete resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer and the serum CEA and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels at the diagnosis of postoperative re-recurrence.

RESULTS

The median preoperative serum CEA level was 4 ng/mL and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was 12 U/mL. Of the 90 patients, 43.3% had serum CEA ≥5 ng/mL, and 15.6% had serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥37 U/mL. Preoperatively, this serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level strongly correlated with poorer prognoses regarding cancer-specific survival. Postoperatively, serum CEA ≥5 ng/mL significantly correlated with a worse prognosis. At the time of diagnosis of re-recurrence after resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer, 53.2% of patients had serum CEA ≥5 ng/mL, and 23.4% of patients had serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥37 U/mL.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its single-center retrospective design, an insufficient sample size, and a relatively long study period.

CONCLUSIONS

High serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 preoperatively and CEA postoperatively are associated with poor prognosis after locally recurrent rectal cancer. Furthermore, we found a high rate of serum CEA elevation in the diagnosis of postoperative re-recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C106 .

IMPORTANCIA CLNICA DE LOS NIVELES SRICOS PREOPERATORIOS Y POSOPERATORIOS DE CEA Y CA EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A RESECCIN CURATIVA DE CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE RECURRENTE

ANTECEDENTES:La recurrencia local es común después de la resección curativa del cáncer de recto. Aunque se espera que la resección radical del cáncer rectal localmente recurrente sea curativa, la tasa de recurrencia posoperatoria es relativamente alta. Por lo tanto, la identificación de los factores de riesgo de recurrencia puede mejorar el pronóstico del cáncer de recto localmente recurrente con una intervención terapéutica temprana.OBJETIVO:Evaluamos la relación entre los niveles séricos perioperatorios de CEA/CA19-9 y el pronóstico en el cáncer de recto localmente recurrente para validar su utilidad para la vigilancia posoperatoria en el cáncer de recto localmente recurrente.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de un solo centro.AJUSTE:El estudio se basa en datos obtenidos de procedimientos en el Hospital Universitario de Osaka.PACIENTES:Noventa pacientes fueron sometidos a resección radical por cáncer de recto localmente recurrente entre Enero de 2000 y Enero de 2015.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Evaluamos la correlación entre los niveles séricos perioperatorios de CEA/CA19-9 y el pronóstico después de la resección completa del cáncer de recto localmente recurrente y los niveles séricos de CEA y CA19-9 en el diagnóstico de recurrencia posoperatoria.RESULTADOS:La mediana de los niveles séricos preoperatorios de CEA y CA19-9 fueron de 4 ng/mL y 12 U/mL, respectivamente. De los 90 pacientes, el 43,3 % tenía CEA sérico ≥5 ng/mL y el 15,6 % tenía CA19-9 sérico ≥37 U/mL. Antes de la operación, este nivel sérico de CA19-9 se correlacionó fuertemente con peores pronósticos con respecto a la supervivencia específica del cáncer. Después de la operación, el CEA sérico ≥5 ng/mL se correlacionó significativamente con un peor pronóstico. En el momento del diagnóstico de recurrencia después de la resección del cáncer de recto localmente recurrente, el 53,2 % de los pacientes tenían CEA sérico ≥5 ng/mL y el 23,4 % de los pacientes tenían CA19-9 sérico ≥37 U/mL.LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo de un solo centro, un tamaño de muestra insuficiente y un período de estudio relativamente largo.CONCLUSIONES:Los niveles séricos altos de CA19-9 antes de la operación y de CEA después de la operación están asociados con un mal pronóstico después del cáncer de recto localmente recurrente. Además, encontramos una alta tasa de elevación del CEA sérico en el diagnóstico de recurrencia posoperatoria. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C106 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer of Patients with Prior Pelvic Irradiation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for salvage of previously X-ray-irradiated (XRT) locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

METHODS

Between September 2005 and December 2017, 77 patients with LRRC were treated with CIRT re-irradiation. All the patients had received prior XRT with a median dose of 50.0 Gy (range 20-74 Gy), principally for neoadjuvant or adjuvant recurrence prophylaxis in 34 patients and for recurrence in 43 patients. The total CIRT dose of 70.4 Gy (RBE) (gray relative biologic effectiveness) was administered in 16 fixed fractions during 4 weeks (4.4 Gy [RBE] per fraction).

RESULTS

All the patients completed the scheduled treatment course. None of the patients received resection after CIRT. Acute grade 3 toxicities occurred for eight patients (10 %), including five grade 3 pelvic infections (2 involving pain and 1 involving neuropathy). Late grade 3 toxicities occurred for 16 patients (21 %): 13 with late grade 3 pelvic infections, 9 with gastrointestinal toxicity, 1 with skin toxicity, 2 with pain, and 4 with neuropathy. No grade 4+ toxicity was noted. The overall local control rates (infield + out-of-field recurrence) were 69 % at 3 years and 62 % at 5 years. In the planning target volume (PTV), the infield recurrence rates were 90 % and 87 % respectively. The control rates for regional recurrence were 85 % at 3 years and 81 % at 5 years. The median overall survival time was 47 months. The survival rates were 61 % at 3 years and 38 % at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Carbon-ion re-irradiation of previously X-ray-irradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer appears to be safe and effective, providing good local control and survival advantage without unacceptable morbidity.

Posterior-First Two-Stage Approach to En Bloc Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Involving the Pelvic Sidewall

INTRODUCTION

Using standard anterior-only or anterior then posterior approaches can make an R0 resection difficult to achieve in patients with pelvic sidewall recurrences because of confined working spaces and poor visibility.

TECHNIQUE

Given the limitations of standard approaches, we have used a novel posterior-first then anterior 2-stage approach allowing us to widely expose and secure deep margins and control vessels under direct visualization.

RESULTS

We present a technical note describing this approach in patients with recurrent rectal cancer involving the pelvic sidewall with extrapelvic extension.

CONCLUSION

The posterior-first approach may assist in achieving a higher number of R0 resections in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer involving the pelvic sidewall.

Outcomes following repeat exenteration for locally advanced pelvic malignancy

AIM

This study aims to assess surgical outcomes and survival following first, second and third pelvic exenterations for pelvic malignancy.

METHOD

Consecutive patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancy at a quaternary referral centre from January 1994 and December 2017 were included. Demographics and surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent first, second and third pelvic exenterations by generalized mixed modelling with repeated measures. Survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier plots.

RESULTS

Of the 642 exenterations reviewed, 29 (4.5%) were second and 6 (0.9%) were third exenterations. Patients selected for repeat exenteration were more likely to have asymptomatic local recurrences detected on routine surveillance (P < 0.001). Postoperative wound complications increased with repeat exenteration (6%, 17%, 33%; P = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, postoperative length of stay increased from 27 to 38 and 48 days, respectively (P = 0.004). Median survival from first exenteration was 4.75, 5.30 and 8.14 years respectively amongst first, second and third exenteration cohorts (P = 0.849). Median survival from the most recent exenteration was 4.75 years after a first exenteration, 2.02 years after a second exenteration and 1.45 years after a third exenteration (P = 0.0546).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that repeat exenteration for recurrent pelvic malignancy is feasible but is associated with increased complication rates and length of admission and reduced likelihood of attaining R0 margin. Moreover, these data indicate that repeat exenteration does not afford a survival advantage compared with patients having a single exenteration. These data suggest that repeat exenteration for recurrent pelvic malignancy may be of questionable therapeutic value.

A rare presentation of locally re-recurrent colon cancer involving the iliac bone and a review of the literature

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the USA. While locally advanced rectal cancer involving bone has been described extensively, colon cancer locally involving bone has only been described, to our knowledge, in a single case report. In this case report, we describe the presentation and treatment of locally advanced re-recurrent colon cancer involving the iliac bone. We also discuss the available literature on treatment for recurrent and re-recurrent colorectal cancer.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer: Does it work at all?

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been given for primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer for 30 years. Still, its effect is not clear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE search for papers after 1989 on surgical treatment and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for primary advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer, with and without IORT. From each center the most recent paper was generally selected. Survival and local recurrence at five years was tabulated for the total groups and separate R-stages. Also, the technique for IORT, use of EBRT and chemotherapy as well as surgical approach was registered.

RESULTS

In primary cancer 18 papers from 14 centers were tabulated, including one randomized and five internally comparing studies, as well as seven studies without IORT. In locally recurrent cancer 18 papers from 13 centers were tabulated, including four internally comparing studies and also five without IORT. Overall survival (OS) and local recurrence rate (LRR) were higher for primary cancer compared to recurrent cancer. Patients with R0 resections had better outcome than patients with R1 or R2 resections. For primary cancer OS and LR rate of the total groups and R0 stages was not influenced by IORT. An effect on R1/R2 stages cannot be excluded. The only randomized study (primary cancer) did not show any effect of IORT.

CONCLUSION

IORT does not convincingly improve OS and LR rate for primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer. If there is an effect of IORT, it is small and cannot be shown outside randomized studies analyzing the separate R stages.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligo-recurrence within the nodal area from colorectal cancer

Recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) often presents as solitary metastases, oligometastases or oligo-recurrence. Surgical resection became the preferred treatment for patients with CRC lung and hepatic metastases. However, surgical treatment for oligo-recurrence within nodal area is not a widely accepted treatment due to due to their relative rarity and high postoperative morbidity. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is one of the emerging radiation treatment techniques in which a high radiation dose can be delivered to the tumor. High-dose SBRT can ablate the tumor with an efficacy similar to that achieved with surgery, especially for small tumors. However, there have been very few studies on SBRT for oligo-recurrence within nodal area, although several studies have evaluated the role of SBRT in the treatment of liver and lung metastases from CRC. This article reviews the current clinical status of and treatment methods for oligo-recurrence within nodal area from CRC, with particular emphasis on SBRT.

Local colorectal cancer recurrence: pelvic MRI evaluation

Surveillance of colorectal cancer is currently based on dosage of tumoral markers, colonoscopy and multidetector row computed tomography. However, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET-CT are two second-line useful imaging modalities to assess colorectal cancer local recurrence (LR). The anatomical information derived from MRI combined to the functional information provided by diffusion-weighted imaging currently remain of value. Pelvic MRI is accurate not only for detection of pelvic colorectal recurrence but also for the prediction of absence of tumoral invasion in pelvic structures, and it may thus provide a preoperative road map of the recurrence to allow for appropriate surgical planning. As always, correlation of imaging and clinical findings in the multidisciplinary forum is paramount. MRI can also be used to follow-up LR treated with radiofrequency ablation. The aim of this review is to discuss clinical practice and application of MRI in the assessment or pelvic recurrence from colorectal cancer.

Intentionally curative treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of outcome data beyond local recurrence rates after primary treatment in rectal cancer, despite more information being necessary for clinical decision-making. We sought to determine patient selection, therapeutic modalities and outcomes of locally recurrent rectal cancer treated with curative intent.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1990-2010) using the medical subject headings "rectal neoplasms" and "neoplasm recurrence, local." Selection of cohort studies was based on the primary intention of treatment and availability of at least 1 outcome variable.

RESULTS

We included 55 cohort studies comprising 3767 patients; 8 studies provided data on the rate of intentionally curative treatment from an unselected consecutive cohort of patients (481 of 1188 patients; 40%). Patients were symptomatic with pain in 50% (796 of 1607) of cases. Overall, 3088 of 3767 patients underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 56% (1484 of 2637 patients). The rate of external beam radiotherapy was 100% in 9 studies, 0% in 5 studies, and ranged from 12% to 97% in 37 studies. Overall postoperative mortality was 2.2% (57 of 2515 patients). Five-year survival was at least 25%, with an upper limit of 41% in 11 of 18 studies including at least 50 resections. We found a significant increase in reported survival rates over time (r2 = 0.214, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

More uniformity in treatment protocols and reporting on outcomes for locally recurrent rectal cancer is warranted. The observed improvement of reported survival rates in time is probably related to better patient selection and optimized multimodality treatment in specialized centres.

Patterns and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer following multidisciplinary treatment

AIM: To investigate the patterns and decisive prognostic factors for local recurrence of rectal cancer treated with a multidisciplinary team (MDT) modality.

METHODS: Ninety patients with local recurrence were studied, out of 1079 consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery from 1999 to 2007. For each patient, the recurrence pattern was assessed by specialist radiologists from the MDT using imaging, and the treatment strategy was decided after discussion by the MDT. The associations between clinicopathological factors and long-term outcomes were evaluated using both univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS: The recurrence pattern was classified as follows: Twenty-seven (30%) recurrent tumors were evaluated as axial type, 21 (23.3%) were anterior type, 8 (8.9%) were posterior type, and 13 (25.6%) were lateral type. Forty-one patients had tumors that were evaluated as resectable by the MDT and ultimately received surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in 36 (87.8%) of these patients. The recurrence pattern was closely associated with resectability and R0 resection rate (P < 0.001). The recurrence pattern, interval to recurrence, and R0 resection were significantly associated with 5-year survival rate in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that the R0 resection was the unique independent factor affecting long-term survival.

CONCLUSION: The MDT modality improves patient selection for surgery by enabling accurate classification of the recurrence pattern; R0 resection is the most significant factor affecting long-term survival.

Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy (IOERT) in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate disease control, overall survival and prognostic factors in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer after IOERT-containing multimodal therapy.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2006, 97 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer have been treated with surgery and IOERT. IOERT was preceded or followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in 54 previously untreated patients (median dose 41.4 Gy) usually combined with 5-Fluouracil-based chemotherapy (89%). IOERT was delivered via cylindric cones with doses of 10-20 Gy. Adjuvant CHT was given only in a minority of patients (34%). Median follow-up was 51 months.

RESULTS

Margin status was R0 in 37%, R1 in 33% and R2 in 30% of the patients. Neoadjuvant EBRT resulted in significantly increased rates of free margins (52% vs. 24%). Median overall survival was 39 months. Estimated 5-year rates for central control (inside the IOERT area), local control (inside the pelvis), distant control and overall survival were 54%, 41%, 40% and 30%. Resection margin was the strongest prognostic factor for overall survival (3-year OS of 80% (R0), 37% (R1), 35% (R2)) and LC (3-year LC 82% (R0), 41% (R1), 18% (R2)) in the multivariate model. OS was further significantly affected by clinical stage at first diagnosis and achievement of local control after treatment in the univariate model. Distant failures were found in 46 patients, predominantly in the lung. 90-day postoperative mortality was 3.1%.

CONCLUSION

Long term OS and LC can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients with recurrent rectal cancer using a multimodality IOERT-containing approach, especially in case of clear margins. LC and OS remain limited in patients with incomplete resection. Preoperative re-irradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered to improve outcome.

Laparoscopic salvage surgery for recurrent and metachronous colorectal cancer: 15 years' experience in a single center

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic salvage surgery for colorectal cancer is a novel but technically challenging option for surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery in patients with recurrent or metachronous colorectal cancer in comparison with an open approach.

METHODS

The data used in this study were obtained from databases, the data of which were collected prospectively from January 1996 to February 2010. Data pertaining to patients, operations, and short-term outcomes were analyzed and compared between open and laparoscopic salvage groups.

RESULTS

Among the 3,425 patients studied, colorectal cancer recurred in 565 patients (16.5%) and 41 patients had colorectal salvage operations. Twenty-six patients with recurrence underwent open surgery and 15 cases underwent laparoscopic surgery. The short-term outcomes of the laparoscopic group were comparable with those of the open surgery group or were partly favorable. The five-year disease-free interval and overall survival of recurrent cancer patients were not significantly different from those of the open patients. Metachronous colorectal cancer occurred in 13 patients (0.38%), 5 of whom had open surgery and 6 had laparoscopic salvage. The only significant difference between the groups was a shorter operating time for the laparoscopic group. Late in the study, four patients in the laparoscopic recurrent group and one patient in the metachronous group were converted to open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery yielded short-term outcomes that were comparable to those of conventional open surgery, in both recurrent and metachronous colorectal cancer patients. Thus, minimally invasive salvage approaches should be considered as a treatment option for the recurrent and the metachronous colorectal cancer patient.

Clinical outcomes of chemoradiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer

Background

To assess the clinical outcome of chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) and to find useful and significant prognostic factors for a clinical situation.

Methods

Between January 2001 and February 2009, 67 LRRC patients, who entered into concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery, were reviewed retrospectively. Of the 67 patients, 45 were treated with chemoradiotherapy plus surgery, and the remaining 22 were treated with chemoradiotherapy alone. The mean radiation doses (biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions) were 54.6 Gy and 66.5 Gy for the chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery groups, respectively.

Results

The median survival duration of all patients was 59 months. Five-year overall (OS), relapse-free (RFS), locoregional relapse-free (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 48.9%, 31.6%, 66.4%, and 40.6%, respectively. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of symptoms was an independent prognostic factor influencing OS, RFS, LRFS, and DMFS. No statistically significant difference was found in OS (p = 0.181), RFS (p = 0.113), LRFS (p = 0.379), or DMFS (p = 0.335) when comparing clinical outcomes between the chemoradiotherapy with and without surgery groups.

Conclusions

Chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery could be a potential option for an LRRC cure, and the symptoms related to LRRC were a significant prognostic factor predicting poor clinical outcome. The chemoradiotherapy scheme for LRRC patients should be adjusted to the possibility of resectability and risk of local failure to focus on local control.

Accelerated hyperfractionation field-involved re-irradiation combined with concurrent capecitabine chemotherapy for locally recurrent and irresectable rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of accelerated hyperfractionation field-involved re-irradiation combined with concurrent capecitabine chemotherapy for locally recurrent and irresectable rectal cancer (LRIRC).

METHODS

72 patients with LRIRC who underwent the treatment were studied. Three-dimensional conformal accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy (3D-CAHRT) was performed and the dose was delivered with a schedule of 1.2 Gy twice daily, with an interval of at least 6 h between fractions, 5 days a week. Concurrent capecitabine chemotherapy was administered twice daily. After 36 Gy in 30 fractions over 3 weeks, patients were evaluated to define the resectability of the disease. If resection was not feasible irradiation was resumed until the total dose administered to the tumour reached 51.6-56.4 Gy.

RESULTS

Two patients temporarily interrupted concurrent chemoradiation because of Grade IV diarrhoea. The remaining 70 patients completed the planned concurrent chemoradiation. In all patients, the complete response rate was 8.3% and the partial response rate was 51.4%. The overall response rate was 59.7% and clinical benefit rate was 93.1%. Symptomatic responses proved to be obvious and tumour resection was performed in 18 patients. The overall median survival time and median progression-free survival time were 32 and 17 months, respectively. 3 year overall survival and progression-free survival were 45.12% and 31.19%, respectively. Severely acute toxicities included Grade III-IV diarrhoea and granulocytopenia with 9.7% and 8.3% incidence respectively. Small bowel obstruction was severely late toxicity, and the incidence was 1.4%.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional conformal accelerated hyperfractionation field-involved re-irradiation combined with concurrent capecitabine chemotherapy might be an effective and well-tolerated regimen for patients with LRIRC.

Multidisciplinary approach to recurrent/unresectable rectal cancer: how to prepare for the extent of resection

Local recurrence from rectal cancer is a complex problem that should be managed by a multidisciplinary team. Pelvic re-irradiation and intraoperative radiation should be considered in the management of these patients. Long-term survival can be achieved in patients who undergo radical surgery with negative margins of resections. The morbidity of these procedures is high and at times may compromise quality of life. Palliative surgical procedures can be considered; however, in some cases, palliative resections may not be better than nonsurgical palliation.

Prognostic value of quality of life and pain in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Care of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) requires careful patient selection. While curative resection offers survival benefits, significant trade-offs exist for the patient. Knowledge of patient-reported outcomes will help inform treatment decisions.

METHODS

Quality of life (QOL) and pain were prospectively assessed in 105 patients treated for LRRC at a single institution, using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaires. In 54 patients enrolled and followed from diagnosis of LRRC, relationship between pretreatment pain, QOL, and overall survival (OS) were examined.

RESULTS

Patients underwent curative surgical resection (C, 59%), noncurative surgery (NC, 12%) or nonsurgical treatment (NS, 28%). Median OS was 7.1, 1.4, and 1.9 years, respectively (C versus NC: p < 0.001; C versus NS: p = 0.006; NC versus NS: p = 0.261). Physical well-being QOL differed over time (p = 0.042), with greatest difference between C and NC surgery patients (p = 0.049). The remaining QOL domain scores and pain scores demonstrated no significant time or treatment effect. For the 54 patients assessed from diagnosis, median OS was independently predicted by treatment group (C, NC, NS: 4.3, 1.7, versus 2.4 years; p < 0.001) and pretreatment pain intensity (score ≤ 4 versus > 4: 3.8 versus 2.0 years; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Curative surgery offered prolonged survival, but significant pain exists among long-term survivors and should be a focus of survivorship care. Noncurative surgery did not offer apparent advantages over nonsurgical palliation. Patient's pretreatment pain has prognostic value, and should be assessed, treated, and considered in treatment decisions.

Absence of tumor invasion into pelvic structures in locally recurrent rectal cancer: prediction with preoperative MR imaging

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess the accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for identification of tumor invasion into pelvic structures in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer scheduled to undergo curative resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this study, and informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study. Preoperative MR images in 40 consecutive patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer scheduled to undergo curative treatment between October 2003 and November 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Four observers with different levels of experience in reading pelvic MR images assessed tumor invasion into the following structures: bladder, uterus or seminal vesicles, vagina or prostate, left and right pelvic walls, and sacrum. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and a receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed. Surgical and/or histopathologic findings were used as the reference standard. Interobserver agreement was measured by using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Preoperative MR imaging was accurate for the prediction of tumor invasion into structures with negative predictive values of 93%-100% and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.79-1.00 for all structures and observers. Positive predictive values were 53%-100%. Disease was overstaged in 11 (observer 1), 22 (observer 2), 10 (observer 3), and nine (observer 4) structures and was understaged in nine (observer 3) and two (observer 4) structures. Assessment failures were mainly because of misinterpretation of diffuse fibrosis, especially at the pelvic side walls. Interobserver agreement ranged between 0.64 and 0.99 for experienced observers.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MR imaging is accurate for the prediction of absence of tumor invasion into pelvic structures. MR imaging may be useful as a preoperative road map for surgical procedure and may thus increase chances of complete resection. Interpretation of diffuse fibrosis remains difficult.

Prediction of residual disease or distant metastasis after resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

It is important to preoperatively identify patients at high risk of relapse at extrapelvic sites or residual disease after salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer to maximize the survival benefit by indicating whether a surgical approach might be successful.

METHODS

Data from 101 consecutive patients who underwent exploration with curative intent for local recurrence after radical resection of rectal cancer were retrospectively collected. Preoperative factors were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses for their ability to predict resectability and distant disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival rates of R0, R1, and R2 resection were 43.3%, 19.5%, and 10.0%, respectively (P < .001). In a logistic regression analysis, upper sacral (above the inferior margin of the second sacrum)/lateral invasive type and high-grade lymphatic invasion of the primary tumor were associated with palliative surgery. A Cox regression analysis revealed that upper sacral/lateral invasive type, extrapelvic disease, hydronephrosis at recurrence, and high-grade lymphatic or venous invasion of the primary tumor were associated with a lower distant disease-free survival rate. Patients with one or more of these risk factors had a 3-year distant disease-free survival rate of 6.2% compared with 54.1% for those with none of these risk factors.

CONCLUSION

It was possible to preoperatively identify patients at high risk of relapse or residual disease. This system might be used on an individual basis to select patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer for chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgical intervention with curative intent.

Combined modality therapy including intraoperative electron irradiation for locally recurrent colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate survival, relapse patterns, and prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer relapse treated with curative-intent therapy, including intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From April 1981 through January 2008, 607 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer received IOERT as a component of treatment. IOERT was preceded or followed by external radiation (median dose, 45.5 Gy) in 583 patients (96%). Resection was classified as R0 in 227 (37%), R1 in 224 (37%), and R2 in 156 (26%). The median IOERT dose was 15 Gy (range, 7.5-30 Gy).

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 36 months. Five- and 10-year survival rates were 30% and 16%, respectively. Survival estimates at 5 years were 46%, 27%, and 16% for R0, R1, and R2 resection, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection, no prior chemotherapy, and more recent treatment (in the second half of the series) were associated with improved survival. The 3-year cumulative incidence of central, local, and distant relapse was 12%, 23%, and 49%, respectively. Central and local relapse were more common in previously irradiated patients and in those with subtotal resection. Toxicity Grade 3 or higher partially attributable to IOERT was observed in 66 patients (11%). Neuropathy was observed in 94 patients (15%) and was more common with IOERT doses exceeding 12.5 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival and disease control was achievable in patients with locally recurrent colorectal cancer. Continued evaluation of curative-intent, combined-modality therapy that includes IOERT is warranted in this high-risk population.

Clinical value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing suspicious relapse after rectal cancer resection

AIM: To evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in the restaging of resected rectal cancer.

METHODS: From January 2007 to Sep 2008, 21 patients who had undergone curative surgery resection for rectal carcinoma with suspicious relapse in conventional imaging or clinical findings were retrospectively enrolled in our study. The patients underwent 28 PET/CT scans (two patients had two scans, one patient had three and one had four scans). Locoregional recurrences and/or distant metastases were confirmed by histological analysis or clinical and imaging follow-up.

RESULTS: Final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological diagnosis in 12 patients (57.1%) and by clinical and imaging follow-up in nine patients (42.9%). Eight patients had extrapelvic metastases with no evidence of pelvic recurrence. Seven patients had both pelvic recurrence and extrapelvic metastases, and two patients had pelvic recurrence only. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was negative in two patients and positive in 19 patients. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was true positive in 17 patients and false positive in two. The accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was 90.5%, negative predictive value was 100%, and positive predictive value was 89.5%. Five patients with perirectal recurrence underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT image guided tissue core biopsy. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT also guided surgical resection of pulmonary metastases in three patients and monitored the response to salvage chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in four patients.

CONCLUSION: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is useful for evaluating suspicious locoregional recurrence and distant metastases in the restaging of rectal cancer after curative resection.

Composite abdominosacral resection for recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

En bloc resection of the tumour and adjacent involved organs offers the only realistic curative option for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. This study assessed outcomes of composite resection for recurrent tumours involving the sacrum.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients underwent composite abdominosacral resection (abdominal mobilization and stoma construction followed by sacral division and tumour retrieval) for recurrent rectal cancer between 2001 and 2007. Patients were staged with preoperative computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. Data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Forty patients (28 men; median age 59 (range 31-77) years) underwent surgery with sacral division at the S2/3 interface in 13, S3/4 level in 20 and S4/5 level in seven patients. One patient died and 24 had complications. An R0 resection was achieved in 20 patients and conferred benefit in disease-free interval over an R1 resection. The mean disease-free interval was 55.6 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 40.0 to 71.3) months for R0 and 32.2 (95 per cent c.i. 19.7 to 44.7) months for R1 resection (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Composite abdominosacral resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer is an effective treatment for a difficult clinical scenario.

Risk factors for local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection

AIM: To explore the risk factors for local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection.

METHODS: Specimens of middle and lower rectal carcinoma from 56 patients who received curative resection at the Department of General Surgery of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital were studied. A large slice technique was used to detect mesorectal metastasis and evaluate circumferential resection margin status. The relations between clinicopathologic characteristics, mesorectal metastasis and circumferential resection margin status were identified in patients with local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma.

RESULTS: Local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection occurred in 7 of the 56 patients (12.5%), and was significantly associated with family history (χ² = 3.929, P = 0.047), high CEA level (χ² = 4.964, P = 0.026), cancerous perforation (χ² = 8.503, P = 0.004), tumor differentiation (χ² = 9.315, P = 0.009) and vessel cancerous emboli (χ² = 11.879, P = 0.001). In contrast, no significant correlation was found between local recurrence of rectal carcinoma and other variables such as age (χ² = 0.506, P = 0.477), gender (χ² = 0.102, χ² = 0.749), tumor diameter (χ² = 0.421, P = 0.516), tumor infiltration (χ² = 5.052, P = 0.168), depth of tumor invasion (χ² = 4.588, P = 0.101), lymph node metastases (χ² = 3.688, P = 0.055) and TNM staging system (χ² = 3.765, P = 0.152). The local recurrence rate of middle and lower rectal carcinoma was 33.3% (4/12) in patients with positive circumferential resection margin and 6.8% (3/44) in those with negative circumferential resection margin. There was a significant difference between the two groups (χ² = 6.061, P = 0.014). Local recurrence of rectal carcinoma occurred in 6 of 36 patients (16.7%) with mesorectal metastasis, and in 1 of 20 patients (5.0%) without mesorectal metastasis. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ² = 1.600, P = 0.206).

CONCLUSION: Family history, high CEA level, cancerous perforation, tumor differentiation, vessel cancerous emboli and circumferential resection margin status are the significant risk factors for local recurrence of middle and lower rectal carcinoma after curative resection. Local recurrence may be more frequent in patients with mesorectal metastasis than in patients without mesorectal metastasis.

Radical resection after IORT-containing multimodality treatment is the most important determinant for outcome in patients treated for locally recurrent rectal cancer

Background

The optimal treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is still a matter of debate. This study assessed the outcome of LRRC patients treated with multimodality treatment, consisting of neoadjuvant radio (chemo-) therapy, extended resection, and intraoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients with LRRC who underwent treatment between 1994 and 2006 were studied. The prognostic values of patient-, tumor- and treatment-related characteristics were tested with uni- and multivariate analysis.

Results

Median overall survival was 28 months (range 0-146 months). Five-year overall, disease-free, and metastasis-free survival and local control (OS, DFS, MFS, and LC respectively) were 31.5%, 34.1%, 49.5% and 54.1% respectively. Radical resection (R0) was obtained in 84 patients (57.2%), microscopically irradical resection (R1) in 34 patients (23.1%), and macroscopically irradical resection (R2) in 29 patients (19.7%). For patients with a radical resection median OS was 59 months and the 5-year OS, DFS, MFS, and LC were 48.4%, 52.3%, 65.5% and 68.9%, respectively. Radical resection was significantly correlated with improved OS, DFS, and LC (P < 0.001). Patients who received re-irradiation or full-course radiotherapy survived significantly longer (P = 0.043) and longer without local recurrence (P = 0.038) or metastasis (P < 0.001) compared to patients who were not re-irradiated.

Conclusions

Radical resection is the most significant predictor of improved survival in patients with LRRC. Neoadjuvant radio (chemo-) therapy is the best option in order to realize a radical resection. Re-irradiation is feasible in patients who already received irradiation as part of the primary rectal cancer treatment.

Prognostic value of lateral lymph node metastasis for advanced low rectal cancer

AIM

To evaluate the risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in order to make the effective selection of patients who could benefit from lateral lymph node dissection, as well as the relationship of lateral lymph node metastasis with local recurrence and survival of patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for advanced lower rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The relation of lateral lymph node metastasis with clinicopathologic characteristics, local recurrence and survival of patients was identified.

RESULTS

Lateral lymph node metastasis was observed in 14.6% (14/96) of patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node metastasis was detected in 10 (25.0%) of 40 patients with tumor diameter >or= 5 cm and in 4 (7.1%) of 56 patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (c2 = 5.973, P = 0.015). Lateral lymph node metastasis was more frequent in patients with 4/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (7 of 10 cases, 70.0%), compared with patients with 3/4, 2/4 and 1/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (3 of 25 cases, 12.0%; 3 of 45 cases, 6.7%; 1 of 16 cases, 6.3%) (c2 = 27.944, P = 0.0001). The lateral lymph node metastasis rate was 30.0% (9 of 30 cases), 9.1% (4 of 44 cases) and 4.5% (1 of 22 cases) for poorly, moderately and well-differentiated carcinoma, respectively. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (c2 = 8.569, P = 0.014). Local recurrence was 18.8% (18 of 96 cases), 64.3% (9 of 14 cases), and 11.0% (9 of 82 cases) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in those with and without lateral lymph node metastasis, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (c2 = 22.308, P = 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant improvements in median survival (80.9 +/- 2.1 m, 95% CI: 76.7-85.1 m vs 38 +/- 6.7 m, 95% CI: 24.8-51.2 m) of patients without lateral lymph node metastasis compared with those with lateral lymph node metastasis (log-rank, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Tumor diameter, infiltration and differentiation are significant risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy should be performed following surgery for patients with tumor diameter >or= 5 cm. Lateral lymph node metastasis is an important predictor for local recurrence and survival in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

A exenteração pélvica para o câncer de reto: avaliação dos fatores prognósticos de sobrevida em 27 pacientes operados

OBJETIVO: Identificar os fatores prognósticos de sobrevida dos pacientes submetidos à exenteração pélvica no tratamento curativo do câncer de reto (no Estádio T4 e na recidiva pélvica isolada). MÉTODOS: Os dados completos de 27 pacientes submetidos a esse tipo de operação por adenocarcinoma de reto entre Janeiro de 1996 a Junho de 2006 foram avaliados. Foram estudados diversos fatores prognósticos epidemiológicos, cirúrgicos e histológicos por meio de análise multivariada. RESULTADOS: A mortalidade pós-operatória foi de 7 % (n=2) enquanto a morbidade global foi de 55 % (n=15). A média de sobrevida global foi de 38 meses. A sobrevida global foi maior nos tumores T4 do que nas recidivas pélvicas (47 X 26 meses). Somente o comprometimento linfonodal (N+) foi fator prognóstico negativo na análise multivariada. CONCLUSÃO: A exenteração pélvica para o tratamento do câncer de reto apresenta alta morbidade e considerável mortalidade. Deve ser indicada nos tumores T4, principalmente quando não há disseminação linfonodal.

Extended radical resection: the choice for locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Surgery for recurrent rectal cancer is the only therapy with curative potential. This study was designed to assess factors that affect survival after surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

METHODS

Prospective databases of patients undergoing surgical resection for recurrent rectal cancer at three tertiary centers between 1990 and 2006 were combined and analyzed. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to assess factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients (96 males) underwent surgery (median age, 63 (range, 27-93) years). Ninety-five patients (59 percent) received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Sixty-three patients (39 percent) underwent radical resection and 90 (56 percent) underwent extended radical resection. Seven patients (5 percent) were irresectable. There was one death and 27 percent had major postoperative complications, independent of extent of resection. Negative resection margins were obtained in 98 patients (R0 61 percent). Median cancer-specific and overall survival was 48 months (41.5 percent 5-year survival) and 43 months (36.6 percent 5-year survival), respectively. Margin involvement was a significant predictor of cancer-specific (P<0.001) and overall survival (P<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection for recurrent rectal cancer results in good survival with acceptable morbidity, unaffected by the extent of resection. Extended radical resection to obtain clear resection margins is the appropriate management of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Prognostic value of lateral lymph node metastasis for advanced low rectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in order to make the effective selection of patients who could benefit from lateral lymph node dissection, as well as the relationship of lateral lymph node metastasis with local recurrence and survival of patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

METHODS: A total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for advanced lower rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The relation of lateral lymph node metastasis with clinicopathologic characteristics, local recurrence and survival of patients was identified.

RESULTS: Lateral lymph node metastasis was observed in 14.6% (14/96) of patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node metastasis was detected in 10 (25.0%) of 40 patients with tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm and in 4 (7.1%) of 56 patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ² = 5.973, P = 0.015). Lateral lymph node metastasis was more frequent in patients with 4/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (7 of 10 cases, 70.0%), compared with patients with 3/4, 2/4 and 1/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (3 of 25 cases, 12.0%; 3 of 45 cases, 6.7%; 1 of 16 cases, 6.3%) (χ² = 27.944, P = 0.0001). The lateral lymph node metastasis rate was 30.0% (9 of 30 cases), 9.1% (4 of 44 cases) and 4.5% (1 of 22 cases) for poorly, moderately and well-differentiated carcinoma, respectively. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (χ² = 8.569, P = 0.014). Local recurrence was 18.8% (18 of 96 cases), 64.3% (9 of 14 cases), and 11.0% (9 of 82 cases) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in those with and without lateral lymph node metastasis, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ² = 22.308, P = 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant improvements in median survival (80.9 ± 2.1 m, 95% CI: 76.7-85.1 m vs 38 ± 6.7 m, 95% CI: 24.8-51.2 m) of patients without lateral lymph node metastasis compared with those with lateral lymph node metastasis (log-rank, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Tumor diameter, infiltration and differentiation are significant risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy should be performed following surgery for patients with tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm. Lateral lymph node metastasis is an important predictor for local recurrence and survival in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Prognostic and predictive factors after surgical treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a single institute experience

OBJECTIVE

Resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) after curative resection represents a difficult problem and a surgical challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of resecting the local recurrence of rectal cancer and to analyze factors that might predict curative resection and those that affect survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed in 50 patients who underwent surgical exploration with intent to cure LRRC between April 1998 and April 2005. All of the patients had previously undergone resection of primary rectal adenocarcinoma. Of these patients' charts, operation and pathology reports were reviewed. Primary tumor and treatment details, hospital of initial treatment and TNM stage were registered. The following data were collected concerning the detection of the local recurrence; date of recurrence, symptoms at the time of presentation and diagnostic work-up. Perioperative complication and date of discharge were also gathered. The recurrent tumors were classified as not fixed (F0), fixed at one site (F1) and fixed to two or more sites (F2) according to the preoperative and peroperative findings. Microscopic involvement of surgical margins and localization of recurrence were noted based on pathology reports.

RESULTS

The median time interval between resection of primary tumor and surgery for locally recurrent disease was 24 (4-113) months. In a statistical analysis, initial surgery, complaints of patients, increasing number of sites of the recurrent tumor fixation in the pelvis, location of the recurrent tumor were associated with curative surgery. Curative, negative resection margins were obtained in 24 (48%) of patients; in these patients a median survival of 28 months was achieved, compared to 12 months (p=0.01) in patients with either microscopic or gross residual disease. Primary operation and CEA level at recurrence were also found to be important factors associated with improved survival. There was no operative mortality and, the complication rate was 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that many patients with LRRC can be resected with negative margins. The type of primary surgery, symptoms, location, and fixity of recurrent tumor are associated with the increased possibility of carrying out curative resection. Previous surgery and curative surgery are significant predictors of both disease-specific survival and overall survival.

CT colonography: surveillance in patients with a history of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. It is also a disease that is preventable if precursor adenomatous polys are removed. Once a diagnosis of colorectal cancer is made, surgical resection is the only means of cure. The ability to resect colorectal cancer for cure is largely dependent upon the stage of tumor at presentation. Once a patient has been treated for colorectal cancer with surgery and in some cases neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy, they will present for follow-up. Surveillance is performed on these patients in order to detect local recurrence that if detected early can be surgically resected for cure. Surveillance also allows detection of distant metastatic disease that may in some cases also be cured with resection. Finally, surveillance of the remaining colon is important to detect the development of new or metachronous adenomatoid polyps that if left in place could develop into new colon cancers. Imaging can play a part in patient surveillance to detect recurrent disease at extracolonic sites as well as the development of new colonic lesions. CT colonography is a promising tool for surveillance in patients with a history of colorectal cancer.

[Results of resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer]

AIMS OF THE STUDY

The treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) remains a difficult and controversial issue. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the results of an univocal attitude associating resection of a priori resectable lesions using visceral excisions as required, without sacral excision, but including intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 1999, 32 patients underwent resection for LRRC. Twelve had previously undergone abdomino-perineal excision and 22 had received radiotherapy. Twenty-three patients underwent pelvic exenteration (total in 17, with rectus myocutaneous flap in 18). Twenty-five patients underwent IORT.

RESULTS

Three patients (9.3%) died in the early postoperative period and 11 experienced complications (37%). Resections were considered R0 in 6 patients, R1 in 21 patients and R2 in 5 patients. Five-year survival rates, overall and without disability, were respectively 12%, 12% and 5%. Median survivals, overall and without disability, were respectively 22 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Resection of LRRC remains a surgical challenge. It may achieve an average of one-year survival without disability, and hope for a few cures. Improvement of oncologic results might come from a more accurate patient selection.