1
|
Giddings HL, Yang PF, Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Ng KS. Influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on the outcomes after ileo-anal pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae088. [PMID: 38740552 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ('pouch surgery') provides a chance to avoid permanent ileostomy after proctocolectomy, but can be associated with poor outcomes. The relationship between hospital-level/surgeon factors (including volume) and outcomes after pouch surgery is of increasing interest given arguments for increasing centralization of these complex procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the literature describing the influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS A systematic review was performed of studies reporting outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. The MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched (1978-2022). Data on outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, readmission, operative approach, reconstruction, postoperative parameters, and pouch-specific outcomes (failure), were extracted. Associations between hospital-level/surgeon factors and these outcomes were summarized. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022352851). RESULTS A total of 29 studies, describing 41 344 patients who underwent a pouch procedure, were included; 3 studies demonstrated higher rates of pouch failure in lower-volume centres, 4 studies demonstrated higher reconstruction rates in higher-volume centres, 2 studies reported an inverse association between annual hospital pouch volume and readmission rates, and 4 studies reported a significant association between complication rates and surgeon experience. CONCLUSION This review summarizes the growing body of evidence that supports centralization of pouch surgery to specialist high-volume inflammatory bowel disease units. Centralization of this technically demanding surgery that requires dedicated perioperative medical and nursing support should facilitate improved patient outcomes and help train the next generation of pouch surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh L Giddings
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phillip F Yang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giddings HL, Ng KS, Solomon MJ, Steffens D, Van Buskirk J, Young J. High but decreasing rates of reconstruction after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and evidence of a direct volume outcome relationship. ANZ J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38525855 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total (procto)colectomy is indicated in 15%-20% of ulcerative colitis(UC) patients during their disease course. Reconstruction options to avoid a permanent ileostomy include an ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). This study aimed to investigate reconstruction rates using Australian-based population-level data, and factors influencing reconstruction. METHODS A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. Patients with UC who underwent total (procto)colectomy with a minimum of 1-year follow up were included. The main outcome was reconstruction with either IPAA or IRA. The influence of hospital and patient factors on reconstruction rates was assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 1047 patients underwent a (procto)colectomy for UC (mean age 45.9 years [SD ± 18.3], 640 [61.1%] male). The 5-year reconstruction rate was 55% (IPAA 89%). Advanced age, emergent colectomy, higher comorbidity burden, and geographical remoteness were significantly associated with lower reconstruction rates. A lower reconstruction rate was also observed in the most recent time-period (2014-2019) (aHR 0.68[95% CI 0.54-0.86]), and where index (procto)colectomy was performed in low-volume (<1 pouch/year) pouch hospitals (aHR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.82]). CONCLUSIONS NSW Australia has the highest reported rate of reconstruction following UC (procto)colectomy globally. However, rates reduced in the most recent time-period. There was variation in reconstruction rates across centres, with primary and overall reconstruction rates proportionate to hospital pouch volume. Reconstruction rates were also lower for patients living outside major cities. To ensure equitable opportunities for reconstruction, patients being considered for IBD pouch surgery should be centralized to a limited number of specialist pouch centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh L Giddings
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joe Van Buskirk
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Public Health Research Analytics and Methods for Evidence, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Young
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bayat Z, Kennedy ED, Victor JC, Govindarajan A. Surgeon factors but not hospital factors associated with length of stay after colorectal surgery - A population based study. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:2354-2365. [PMID: 37897114 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM Length of stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery (CRS) is a significant driver of healthcare utilization and adverse patient outcomes. To date, there is little high-quality evidence in the literature examining how individual surgeon and hospital factors independently impact LOS. We aimed to identify and quantify the independent impact of surgeon and hospital factors on LOS after CRS. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using validated health administrative databases, encompassing all patients from the province of Ontario, Canada. All patients from 121 hospitals in Ontario who underwent elective CRS between 2008 and 2019 in Ontario were included, and factors pertaining to these patients and their treating surgeon and hospital were assessed. A negative binomial regression model was used to assess the independent effect of surgeon and hospital factors on LOS, accounting for a comprehensive collection of determinants of LOS. To minimize unmeasured confounding, the analysis was repeated in a subgroup comprising patients undergoing lower-complexity CRS without postoperative complications. RESULTS A total of 90,517 CRS patients were analysed. Independent of patient and procedural factors, low surgeon volume (lowest volume quartile) was associated with a 20% increase in LOS (95% CI: 12-29, p < 0.0001) compared to high surgeon volume (highest volume quartile). In the 22,639 patients undergoing uncomplicated lower-complexity surgeries, a 43% longer LOS was seen in the lowest volume surgeon quartile (95% CI: 26-61, p < 0.0001). In both models, more years-in-practice was associated with a small increase in LOS (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.02-1.03, p < 0.0001). Hospital factors were not significantly associated with increased LOS. CONCLUSIONS Surgeon factors, including low surgeon volume and increasing years-in-practice, were strongly and independently associated with longer LOS, whereas hospital factors did not have an independent impact. This suggests that LOS is driven primarily by surgeon-mediated care processes and may provide actionable targets for provider-level interventions to reduce LOS after CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zubair Bayat
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin D Kennedy
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Charles Victor
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Govindarajan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giddings HL, Ng KS, Solomon MJ, Steffens D, Van Buskirk J, Young J. Population outcomes, trends and the future of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: a 19-year New South Wales data linkage study. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2686-2696. [PMID: 37449791 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the gold standard reconstructive option in ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent efforts to improve pouch outcomes have seen a push towards centralisation of surgery. This study aimed to document outcomes following pouch surgery at a population level within New South Wales (NSW), and identify factors associated with, and temporal trends of these outcomes. METHODS A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. The primary outcome was pouch failure in patients with UC who underwent IPAA. The influence of hospital level factors (including annual volume) and patient demographic variables on this outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modelling. Temporal trends in annual volume and evidence for centralisation over the studied period were assessed using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS The annual volume of UC pouches reduced over the study period. The pouch failure rates were 8.6% (95% CI 6.3-10.8%) and 10.6% (95% CI 8.0-13.1%) at 5- and 10-years, respectively. Increasing age and non-elective admission were associated with higher failure rates. One-third of UC pouches (31.6%) were performed in a single institution, which averaged 6.5 pouches/year throughout the study period. Three-quarters (19/25) of NSW public hospitals who performed pouches performed less than one UC pouch annually. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes following UC pouch surgery in NSW are comparable with global standards. Concentrating IBD pouch surgery with the aim of producing specialist surgical teams may be a reasonable way forward in NSW and would ensure equity of access and facilitate research and training collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh L Giddings
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joe Van Buskirk
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Public Health Research Analytics and Methods for Evidence, Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Young
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bayat Z, Guidolin K, Elsolh B, De Castro C, Kennedy E, Govindarajan A. Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review. BJS Open 2022; 6:6704875. [PMID: 36124901 PMCID: PMC9487584 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although length of stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery (CRS) is associated with worse patient and system level outcomes, the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence for the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS. Methods A comprehensive database search was conducted using terms related to LOS and CRS. Studies were included if they reported the effect of surgeon or hospital factors on LOS after elective CRS. The evidence for the effect of each surgeon and hospital factor on LOS was synthesized using vote counting by direction of effect, taking risk of bias into consideration. Results A total of 13 946 unique titles and abstracts were screened, and 69 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were retrospective and assessed a total of eight factors. Surgeon factors such as increasing surgeon volume, colorectal surgical specialty, and progression along a learning curve were significantly associated with decreased LOS (effect seen in 87.5 per cent, 100 per cent, and 93.3 per cent of studies respectively). In contrast, hospital factors such as hospital volume and teaching hospital status were not significantly associated with LOS. Conclusion Provider-related factors were found to be significantly associated with LOS after elective CRS. In particular, surgeon-related factors related to experience specifically impacted LOS, whereas hospital-related factors did not. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these relationships may allow for tailoring of interventions to reduce LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zubair Bayat
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Sinai Health System , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Keegan Guidolin
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Basheer Elsolh
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | | | - Erin Kennedy
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Sinai Health System , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Anand Govindarajan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Sinai Health System , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kling SM, Raman S, Taylor GA, Philp MM, Poggio JL, Dauer ED, Oresanya LB, Ross HM, Kuo LE. Trends in General Surgery Resident Experience with Colorectal Surgery: An Analysis of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Case Logs. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2022; 79:632-642. [PMID: 35063391 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal surgery is a core component of general surgery. The volume of colorectal surgery performed by general surgery residents throughout training has not been studied. This study aims to analyze trends observed in colorectal-specific case numbers logged by general surgery residents over 16 years. DESIGN Case number data for general surgery residents was extracted from the publicly available, annually published Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database from 2003 to 2019. Cases were categorized as open or laparoscopic colectomy/proctectomy, colectomy with ileoanal pull-thru, abdomino-perineal resection (APR), transanal rectal tumor excision (TRE), anorectal procedure, colonoscopy, and total colorectal cases. The average case numbers per category was calculated for each year. Linear regression analyzed trends in case categories for all residents and those logged as surgeon chief and junior residents. SETTING ACGME accredited general surgery residency programs. PARTICIPANTS Not applicable. RESULTS General surgery residents reported increased numbers of all, chief, and junior resident colorectal cases over the study period (124.5-173.7 cases/yr; 38.4-53.0 cases/yr; 86.4-120.6 cases/yr, all p = 0.00). Average cases for all, chief, and junior residents have increased for laparoscopic colectomy/proctectomy (4.6-26.4 cases/year; 2.7-12.9 cases/year; 2.0-13.5 cases/year, all p = 0.00), anorectal surgeries (26.7-37.7 cases/year; 5.4-9.9 cases/year; 21.3-27.8 cases/year, all p = 0.00), and colonoscopies (35.9-70.6 cases/year, p = 0.00; 6.6-14.1 cases/year, p = 0.01; 29.4-56.5 cases/year, p = 0.00). Average cases for all, chief, and junior residents have decreased for open colectomy/proctectomy (52.0-34.9 cases/year; 21.2-14.3 cases/year; 30.9-20.6 cases/year, all p = 0.00), APR (3.3-2.7 cases/year, p = 0.00; 1.8-1.3 cases/year, p = 0.00; 1.5-1.4 cases/year, p = 0.02), TRE (1.9-1.1 cases/year; 0.7-0.4 cases/year; 1.2-0.6 cases/year, all p = 0.00). Ileoanal pull-thru did not demonstrate a linear trend. CONCLUSIONS The increase in exposure to colectomies/proctectomies, anorectal procedures and colonoscopies is encouraging, as these common colorectal operations will be encountered in general surgery practice. The observed low case numbers for TRE, APR, and ileoanal pull-thru suggest a need for specialized training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Kling
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Swathi Raman
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - George A Taylor
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew M Philp
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Juan Lucas Poggio
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth D Dauer
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lawrence B Oresanya
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Howard M Ross
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lindsay E Kuo
- Department of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Deputy
- Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Short-term and Long-term Outcomes Following Pelvic Pouch Excision: The Mount Sinai Hospital Experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:1621-1627. [PMID: 33149024 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have reported surgical outcomes following pouch excision and fewer have described the long-term sequelae. Given the debate regarding optimal surgical management following pouch failure, an accurate estimation of the morbidity associated with this procedure addresses a critical knowledge gap. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to review our institutional experience with pouch excision with a focus on indications, short-term outcomes, and long-term reintervention rates. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING This study was conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients registered in the prospectively maintained IBD database with a diagnosis of pelvic pouch failure between 1991 and 2018 were selected. INTERVENTION The patients had undergone pelvic pouch excision was measured. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Indications for excision, incidence of short-term and long-term complications, and long-term surgical reintervention were the primary outcomes. In addition, multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify predictors of chronic perineal wound complications and the effect of preoperative diversion. The positive predictive value of a clinical suspicion of Crohn's disease of the pouch was also evaluated. RESULTS One hundred forty cases were identified. Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced short-term complications and 49.3% experienced delayed morbidity. Overall, one-third of patients required long-term reoperation related to perineal wound, stoma, and hernia complications. On multivariable regression, immunosuppression was associated with increased odds of perineal wound complications, and preoperative diversion was not associated with perineal wound healing. Crohn's disease was suspected in 24 patients preoperatively but confirmed on histopathology in only 6 patients. LIMITATIONS This is a retrospective chart review of a single institution's experience, whereby complication rates may be underestimates of the true event rates. CONCLUSIONS Pouch excision is associated with high postoperative morbidity and long-term reintervention due to nonhealing perineal wounds, stoma complications, and hernias. Further study is required to clarify risk reduction strategies to limit perineal wound complications and the appropriate selection of patients for diversion alone vs pouch excision in IPAA failure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B348. RESULTADOS A CORTO Y LARGO PLAZO DESPUÉS DE LA EXTIRPACIÓN DE LA BOLSA PéLVICA: LA EXPERIENCIA DEL HOSPITAL MOUNT SINAÍ: Pocos estudios han informado resultados quirúrgicos después de la escisión de bolsa pélvica (reservorio ileoanal) y menos han descrito las secuelas a largo plazo. Dado el debate sobre el manejo quirúrgico óptimo después de la falla de la bolsa, una estimación precisa de la morbilidad asociada con este procedimiento aborda una brecha crítica de conocimiento.El objetivo de este estudio fue revisar nuestra experiencia institucional con la extirpación de la bolsa con un enfoque en las indicaciones, los resultados a corto plazo y las tasas de reintervención a largo plazo.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Hospital Mt Sinaí, Toronto, Ontario, Canadá.Pacientes adultos registrados en la base de datos de EII mantenida prospectivamente con un diagnóstico de falla de la bolsa pélvica entre 1991 y 2018.Escisión de bolsa pélvica.Las indicaciones para la escisión, la incidencia de complicaciones a corto y largo plazo y la reintervención quirúrgica a largo plazo fueron los resultados primarios valorados. Además, se ajustaron modelos de regresión logística multivariable para identificar predictores de complicaciones de la herida perineal crónica y el efecto de la derivación preoperatoria. También se evaluó el valor predictivo positivo de una sospecha clínica de enfermedad de Crohn de la bolsa.Se identificaron 140 casos. El 59% de los pacientes desarrollaron complicaciones a corto plazo y el 49,3% con morbilidad tardía. En general, 1/3 de los pacientes requirieron una reoperación a largo plazo relacionada con complicaciones de herida perineal, estoma y hernia. En la regresión multivariable, la inmunosupresión se asoció con mayores probabilidades de complicaciones de la herida perineal y la derivación preoperatoria no se asoció con la cicatrización de la herida perineal. La enfermedad de Crohn se sospechó en 24 pacientes antes de la operación, pero se confirmó por histopatología en solo 6 pacientes.Revisión retrospectiva del cuadro de la experiencia de una sola institución por la cual las tasas de complicaciones pueden ser subestimadas de las tasas de eventos reales.La escisión de la bolsa se asocia con una alta morbilidad postoperatoria y una reintervención a largo plazo debido a complicaciones de heridas perineales, complicaciones del estoma y hernias. Se requieren más estudios para aclarar las estrategias de reducción de riesgos para limitar las complicaciones de la herida perineal y la selección adecuada de pacientes para la derivación sola versus la escisión de la bolsa en caso de falla de reservorio ileoanal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B348.
Collapse
|
9
|
Burns EM, Poulton T, Deputy M, Pinkney T, Guy R. An audit of process and outcome for emergency colectomy in England and Wales. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:2133-2139. [PMID: 32936991 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this work was to describe process and outcome for patients undergoing emergency colectomy for colitis in England and Wales. METHOD The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) is a national audit including patients undergoing emergency laparotomy and laparoscopic resectional procedures. Data from adult patients under 65 years of age who underwent emergency subtotal colectomy or panproctocolectomy for colitis between 2013 and 2016 were analysed. RESULTS In total 1204 patients were included. Although approximately a third of patients underwent a colectomy within 5 days of admission [37% (440/1204)], 32% (383/1204) were admitted for more than 10 days prior to surgery. Colorectal surgeons were present at operation in 72% (869/1204) of cases and consultant surgeons attended 94% (1137/1204) of procedures. Laparoscopy was attempted in 32% (390/1204) of operations with wide institutional variation in its use (0-100% of cases). The overall 30-day inpatient mortality was 2.9% (35/1204). On multivariable regression analysis, age > 55 years [OR 3.59 (1.05-12.21), P = 0.041], female gender [OR 2.88 (1.27-6.52), P = 0.011] and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 5 [OR 37.43 (2.72-514.52), P = 0.007] were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION There is a consultant-driven service that is largely delivered by specialist colorectal surgeons. Laparoscopy rates were high although there was wide variation in use across institutions. Preoperative delays were evident, and further work is necessary to determine the underlying reasons for these.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Burns
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK.,Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Poulton
- Health Services Research Centre, National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, London, UK
| | - M Deputy
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK.,Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Pinkney
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Guy
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: long-term outcomes and trends over time in a low-volume institution. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 190:143-149. [PMID: 32472241 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02262-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can restore bowel continuity for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who have needed total colectomy with end ileostomy. Internationally, this surgery is recommended for centralisation focussing reflection on Irish outcomes. METHODS Retrospective study examining patient outcomes after IPAA in our institution over a 15-year period using data from inflammatory bowel disease database, HIPE codes and clinical charts review between January 2002 and January 2018. Cohorts were analysed overall and in 5-year cohorts as well as by access modality of pouch operation. Contextualising Irish data were identified from published literature review. RESULTS Thirty-four patients (average age 34.8, 21/64% male) had IPAA for UC locally with 64-month mean follow-up. Overall laparoscopic procedure rate was 39.4% (85% 2013-17) being associated with lower lengths of stay (10.6 ± 8 vs 12.7 ± 6.5 days open access). The mean total duration of ileostomy was 27.3 ± 22.5 months, being longest most recently and with an open index procedure. Overall pouchitis affected 53% (n = 18) with rates at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years being 17.6%, 38.2, 50.0% and 52.9%, respectively. Pouch failure rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 2.9%, 11.8% and 17.6%. Outcomes were similar with other centres publishing from Ireland although none met modern criteria for high-volume practice. CONCLUSIONS Overall outcomes and practice in this study are consistent with previously published studies on IPAA nationally and internationally. While acceptable, the opportunity from surgical centre collaboration outside of the National Cancer and Acute Surgery Strategies is to offer still better outcomes for our patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Egberg MD, Galanko JA, Kappelman MD. Patients Who Undergo Colectomy for Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis at Low-Volume Hospitals Have More Complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:2713-2721.e4. [PMID: 30853617 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) who undergo colectomy at high-volume centers have better outcomes and fewer complications than those at low-volume centers. We aimed to evaluate the hospital volume of total abdominal colectomy (TAC) for pediatric patients with UC and explore time trends in the proportion of colectomies performed at high-volume centers. We then evaluated the association between hospital colectomy volume and complications. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients (age, ≤18 y) hospitalized for UC using the Kids' Inpatient Database, a nationally representative database of pediatric hospitalizations. We identified UC hospitalizations with a procedural code (International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th revision) for TAC from 1997 through 2016. We defined complications using diagnosis codes adapted from published algorithms. We defined high-volume as hospitals that performed 10 or more TACs annually. We used multivariate statistics to evaluate the association between hospital volume and in-hospital complications. RESULTS A total of 1453 hospitalizations of children with UC included a TAC (2306 colectomies nationwide). A total of 766 hospitals performed 1 or more annual colectomies and only 36 (4.7%) were high-volume hospitals, accounting for 21% of colectomies. The proportion of colectomies at high-volume hospitals decreased over time. The absolute risk of complication was 16% at high-volume centers compared with 22% at low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9). The effect of annual TAC volume on complication risk was not statistically significant for nonemergent admissions. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric patients with UC who undergo colectomy at high-volume centers have fewer complications. However, only a small proportion of pediatric colectomies (<5%) are performed at high-volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Egberg
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Joseph A Galanko
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Michael D Kappelman
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aytac E, Esen E, Aydinli HH, Kirat HT, Schwartzberg DM, Remzi FH. Transabdominal re-do pouch surgery in pediatric patients for failed ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a case matched study. Pediatr Surg Int 2019; 35:895-901. [PMID: 31165911 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-019-04493-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data regarding safety and feasibility of re-do ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for failed ileal pouch in children are limited. In this study, we compared the short- and long-term outcomes of re-do IPAA in pediatric and adult populations in a case-matched setting. METHODS Between March 2007 and June 2017, pediatric patients undergoing a transabdominal re-do IPAA by single surgeon were reviewed and case matched with adult counterparts. Short- and long-term outcomes including complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life of the two groups were compared. RESULTS 60 patients were included (pediatric, n = 30; adult, n = 30). Time between index IPAA and re-do IPAA was shorter in the pediatric group (30 ± 26 vs 86 ± 74 months, p = 0.001). In the pediatric population, the existing pouch was more commonly used to construct the re-do pouch (n = 19 vs n = 12, p = 0.07). There was a trend towards the presence of less postoperative complications in pediatric group (n = 13 vs n = 20, p = 0.07). There were no reoperations or mortality. Long-term pouch survival was comparable between two groups (p = 0.96). Six re-do IPAAs failed in the study period. CONCLUSION Re-do IPAA is safe and feasible in pediatric population with failed IPAA and can be performed with similar short- and long-term outcomes compared to adults in experienced hands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erman Aytac
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eren Esen
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, IBD Center, 23rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - H Hande Aydinli
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, IBD Center, 23rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hasan T Kirat
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, IBD Center, 23rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David M Schwartzberg
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, IBD Center, 23rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Feza H Remzi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, IBD Center, 23rd Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA. .,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Outcome Comparison of Single-port Versus Multiport Versus Under Direct View Completion Proctectomy With Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 29:373-377. [PMID: 31107848 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether the reported theoretical benefits of single-port laparoscopic (SPL) approach can be converted to superior clinical outcomes is still unknown for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients undergoing second-stage proctectomy. This study aimed to compare the short-term postoperative and long-term pouch-related functional outcomes of SPL, multiport laparoscopic (MPL), and direct view (DV) completion proctectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (CP/IPAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent either SPL, MPL, or under DV CP/IPAA for UC between August 2009 and August 2014 were identified from an institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained institutional database and reviewed. Demographics, patient characteristics, short-term and long-term complications, and morbidity were compared between the 3 groups. Multivariate logistic or Cox regression analysis was conducted for covariate adjustments. RESULTS Groups (SPL: n=36; MPL: n=67; DV: n=97) were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics and demographics except for age. The SPL group was associated with reduced estimated blood loss, reduced length of stay compared with the MPL and DV groups, and shorter operating time compared with the MPL group (P<0.001). Similar short-term postoperative and long-term pouch-related functional outcomes were noted without significant differences in quality of life scores among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS SPL CP/IPAA for UC can be safely performed with superior short-term outcomes such as reduced intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay compared with MPL and under direct view approaches, and shorter operating time compared with MPL.
Collapse
|
14
|
Comparable perioperative outcomes, long-term outcomes, and quality of life in a retrospective analysis of ulcerative colitis patients following 2-stage versus 3-stage proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:491-499. [PMID: 30610435 PMCID: PMC6450759 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-03221-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many surgeons assume 3-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is safer than 2-stage IPAA in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC), although recent data suggest outcomes are comparable. This study aimed to compare perioperative complications, late complications, and functional outcomes after 2- versus 3-stage IPAA in patients with active UC. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent 2- or 3-stage IPAA for active UC from 2000 to 2015 in a high-volume institution. Patients completed quality-of-life surveys 6 months following ileostomy reversal. Perioperative and late complications were recorded. Outcomes were compared with the Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS We identified 212 patients who underwent 2- or 3-stage IPAA for active UC, of whom 157 patients (74.1%) underwent 2-stage procedures and 55 (25.9%) underwent 3-stage procedures. More patients undergoing 2-stage procedures were taking immunomodulators preoperatively (46.3% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.01), but there was no difference in use of steroids (p = 0.09) or biologic agents (p = 0.85). Three-stage procedures were more likely to be urgent (78.6% vs. 30.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in perioperative complications (p = 0.50), anastomotic leak (p = 0.94), pouchitis (p = 0.45), pouch failure (p = 0.46), perceived quality of life (p = 0.68), number of bowel movements per day (p = 0.27), or sexual satisfaction (p = 0.21) between the 2- and 3-stage groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing 2-stage compared to 3-stage IPAA for active ulcerative colitis have comparable outcomes and quality of life following ileostomy reversal. Two-stage IPAA appears to be safe and appropriate, even in high-risk patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rottoli M, Vallicelli C, Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Boschi L, Poggioli G. Transabdominal salvage surgery after pouch failure in a tertiary center: A case-matched study. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:446-451. [PMID: 29208550 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage surgery after failure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) could be offered to selected patients. However, the results vary widely in different centers. AIMS To assess the outcomes of salvage surgery by comparison with a control group matched for confounding variables. METHODS From a prospective database of 1286 IPAA, patients undergoing transabdominal salvage surgery were compared for perioperative and functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) to a 1:3 control group of primary IPAA cases. RESULTS Salvage surgery patients (30) had a higher rate of hand-sewn anastomoses (80 vs 20%, p <0.0001) and reoperations (10 vs 2.2%, p 0.02) than control group (90). A higher number of daytime and nighttime bowel movements (7.4 vs 4.1, p <0.0001, and 2.6 vs 1.8, p=0.002), a lower median CGQL score (0.7 vs 0.8, p=0.0001) and a higher rate of pouch fistulae (13.3 vs 1.1%, p=0.003) were reported after salvage surgery. Pouch failure rate after salvage surgery was 10.1%, 18.7% and 26.8% at 1, 5 and 10 years (vs 0%, 3.5% and 8.4% in control group, p=0.0085). CONCLUSIONS Although worse functional outcomes and decreased QOL have to be expected, salvage surgery after pouch failure is associated with acceptable outcomes when performed in a referral center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract - Digestive Disease Department, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Carlo Vallicelli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract - Digestive Disease Department, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Gionchetti
- Intestinal Chronic Bowel Disease Unit - Digestive Disease Department, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fernando Rizzello
- Intestinal Chronic Bowel Disease Unit - Digestive Disease Department, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Boschi
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract - Digestive Disease Department, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract - Digestive Disease Department, Sant'Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Becerra AZ, Hensley BJ, Noyes K, Monson JR, Temple LK, Cellini C. Who gets a pouch after colectomy in New York state and why? Surgery 2018; 163:305-310. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
17
|
Mark-Christensen A, Erichsen R, Brandsborg S, Pachler FR, Nørager CB, Johansen N, Pachler JH, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Kjaer MD, Qvist N, Preisler L, Hillingsø J, Rosenberg J, Laurberg S. Pouch failures following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:44-52. [PMID: 28667683 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a procedure offered to patients with ulcerative colitis who opt for restoration of bowel continuity. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of pouch failure and ascertain the risk factors associated with failure. METHOD The study included 1991 patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in Denmark in the period 1980-2013. Pouch failure was defined as excision of the pouch or presence of an unreversed stoma within 1 year after its creation. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to explore the association between pouch failure and age, gender, synchronous colectomy, primary faecal diversion, annual hospital volume (very low, 1-5 cases per year; low, 6-10; intermediate 11-20; high > 20), calendar year, laparoscopy and primary sclerosing cholangitis. RESULTS Over a median 11.4 years, 295 failures occurred, corresponding to 5-, 10- and 20-year cumulative risks of 9.1%, 12.1% and 18.2%, respectively. The risk of failure was higher for women [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.39, 95% CI 1.10-1.75]. Primary non-diversion (aHR 1.63, 95% CI 1.11-2.41) and a low hospital volume (aHR, very low volume vs high volume 2.30, 95% CI 1.26-4.20) were also associated with a higher risk of failure. The risk of failure was not associated with calendar year, primary sclerosing cholangitis, synchronous colectomy or laparoscopy. CONCLUSION In a cohort of patients from Denmark (where pouch surgery is centralized) with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, women had a higher risk of pouch failure. Of modifiable factors, low hospital volume and non-diversion were associated with a higher risk of pouch failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mark-Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Coloproctology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - R Erichsen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Coloproctology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S Brandsborg
- Department of Surgery, Section of Coloproctology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - F R Pachler
- Department of Surgery, Section of Coloproctology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - C B Nørager
- Department of Surgery, Section of Coloproctology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N Johansen
- Department of Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital Kolding, Kolding, Denmark
| | - J H Pachler
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - O Thorlacius-Ussing
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology A, Aalborg Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - M D Kjaer
- Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - N Qvist
- Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - L Preisler
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Hillingsø
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - S Laurberg
- Department of Surgery, Section of Coloproctology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diederen K, Sahami SS, Tabbers MM, Benninga MA, Kindermann A, Tanis PJ, Oomen MW, de Jong JR, Bemelman WA. Outcome after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in children and adults. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1640-1647. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Studies comparing the outcome of ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) in children and adults are scarce. This complicates decision-making in young patients. The aim of this study was to compare adverse events and pouch function between children and adults who underwent IPAA.
Methods
This cross-sectional cohort study included all consecutive children (aged less than 18 years) and adults with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease or familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent IPAA in a tertiary referral centre between 2000 and 2015. Adverse events were assessed by chart review, and pouch function by interview using a pouch function score (PFS).
Results
In total, 445 patients underwent IPAA: 41 children (median age 15 years) and 404 adults (median age 39 years), with a median follow-up of 22 (i.q.r. 8–68) months. Being overweight (P = 0·001), previous abdominal surgery (P = 0·018), open procedures (P < 0·001) and defunctioning ileostomy (P = 0·014) were less common among children than adult patients. The occurrence of anastomotic leakage, surgical fistulas, chronic pouchitis and Crohn's of the pouch was not associated with paediatric age at surgery, nor was pouch failure. The development of anastomotic strictures was associated with having IPAA surgery during childhood (odds ratio 4·22, 95 per cent c.i. 1·13 to 15·77; P = 0·032). Pouch function at last follow-up was similar in the children and adult groups (median PFS 5·0 versus 6·0 respectively; P = 0·194).
Conclusion
Long-term pouch failure rates and pouch function were similar in children and adults. There is no need for a more cautious attitude to use of IPAA in children based on concerns about poor outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Diederen
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S S Sahami
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M M Tabbers
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Benninga
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Kindermann
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Oomen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J R de Jong
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zittan E, Ma GW, Wong-Chong N, Milgrom R, McLeod RS, Silverberg M, Cohen Z. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a Canadian institution's experience. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32:281-285. [PMID: 27704203 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2670-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to summarize the outcomes of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients receiving an ileal pouch-anal anastamosis (IPAA) over an 11-year period at a high-volume Canadian inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed for subjects with UC who underwent IPAA between 2002 and 2013. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, clinical characteristics, preoperative medical treatment, and surgical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to determine significant factors in postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Seven hundred fifty-eight were included from the IBD database. The median age at the time of surgery was 37.1 (±12.1). Mean preoperative disease duration was 8.1 years (±8.7). Three hundred sixty-nine patients (48.7 %) had systemic corticosteroids (>15 mg/day) within 30 days prior to surgery. Of these, 286 patients had high dose (>30 mg/day) corticosteroids within 7 days of their first surgery. One hundred nine (14.0 %) IPAA procedures were performed laparoscopically. Pelvic pouches were created in traditional 2 (n = 460) and 3 (n = 285) stages; the remainder (n = 13) was performed in non-traditional staged operations. Early complications, defined as occurring within the same stay in hospital, consisted of pelvic abscess (n = 135, 17.8 %), small bowel obstruction (n = 134, 17.7 %), wound infection (n = 108, 14.3 %), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 33, 4.4 %). The overall pouch leak rate was 92 (12.1 %). There was one death in our study. The median length of stay was 10.3 days (SD6.0). Late complications, defined as occurring after discharge from hospital, consisted of anal stricture (n = 55, 7.3 %), pouch fistula (n = 26, 3.4 %), and functional pouch failure (n = 7, 0.9 %). CONCLUSIONS IPAA has been found to be a safe and effective method of surgical management of UC patients in a high-volume IBD center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Zittan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Grace W Ma
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Unit 451, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
| | - N Wong-Chong
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Unit 451, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - R Milgrom
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - R S McLeod
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Unit 451, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - M Silverberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Z Cohen
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Unit 451, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zittan E, Wong-Chong N, Ma GW, McLeod RS, Silverberg MS, Cohen Z. Modified Two-stage Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Results in Lower Rate of Anastomotic Leak Compared with Traditional Two-stage Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2016; 10:766-72. [PMID: 26951468 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2015] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is a paucity of evidence in ulcerative colitis [UC] comparing the traditional two-stage [total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] and diverting ileostomy, followed by ileostomy closure] vs the modified two-stage restorative proctocolectomy [subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy, followed by completion proctectomy and IPAA, without diverting ileostomy]. This study examines the risk of anastomotic leak following IPAA in traditional vs modified two-stage IPAA for UC patients. METHODS This was a single-institution, retrospective study of all UC patients who underwent a traditional or modified two-stage IPAA between 2002 and 2013. The primary outcome was anastomotic leak following IPAA. RESULTS In all, 460 patients had a two-stage IPAA procedure; 223 [48.5%] patients underwent traditional two-stage IPAA and 237 [51.5%] patients received the modified two-stage procedure. There was more preoperative enteral corticosteroid use [44.7% vs 33.2%, p = 0.04] before the first surgery in the modified two-stage group compared with the traditional two-stage group. The modified two-stage group had higher UC disease severity at presentation [86.9% patients with moderate/severe UC vs 73.1%, p < 0.01]. However, the modified two-stage group had a lower rate of anastomotic leak following IPAA [4.6% vs 15.7%, p < 0.01] and was associated with a lower risk of anastomotic leak on univariate (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13, 0.52] and multivariate analysis [OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12, 0.57]. CONCLUSIONS Patients with ulcerative colitis who received the modified two-stage IPAA had a significantly lower rate of anastomotic leak following pouch creation, compared with the traditional two-stage procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eran Zittan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nathalie Wong-Chong
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Grace W Ma
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robin S McLeod
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zane Cohen
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Early and late surgical outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis within a defined population in Sweden. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28:842-9. [PMID: 26945126 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), has become the procedure of choice in patients requiring reconstructive surgery for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. The aim of this population-based study was to present data prospectively registered and retrospectively evaluated on the short-term and the long-term results of 124 consecutive IPAA performed chronologically by three surgeons in a single referral centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent IPAA from 1993 to 2012 were included. Early and late morbidity and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS Early complications were observed in 25 patients. There was one death from cardiac failure, high output stoma occurred in six patients and wound infection occurred in four patients. Complications were associated with higher BMI (P=0.032). Four patients had to be reoperated. Peroperative bleeding was reduced when using an ultrasonically activated scalpel for the perimuscular dissection (P<0.00001). Clavien-Dindo grade III-V affected five patients. Only one patient developed anastomotic leak and septic complications.Late complications occurred in 61 patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. Pouchitis was the most common complication (n=37). Primary sclerosing cholangitis and age younger than 40 years were associated significantly with a three- and two-fold increased risk of pouchitis, respectively. Small bowel obstruction was the second most common complication (n=16), more common in women (P=0.031). The pouch failure rate was low: 2.4%. Clavien-Dindo grade III-V affected 13 patients. CONCLUSION In the hands of experienced high-volume surgeons, IPAA is a safe procedure associated with a relatively low early morbidity as well as an acceptable late morbidity.
Collapse
|
22
|
Louis E, Dotan I, Ghosh S, Mlynarsky L, Reenaers C, Schreiber S. Optimising the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit to Improve Quality of Care: Expert Recommendations. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9:685-91. [PMID: 25987349 PMCID: PMC4584566 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 03/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The best care setting for patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] may be in a dedicated unit. Whereas not all gastroenterology units have the same resources to develop dedicated IBD facilities and services, there are steps that can be taken by any unit to optimise patients' access to interdisciplinary expert care. A series of pragmatic recommendations relating to IBD unit optimisation have been developed through discussion among a large panel of international experts. METHODS Suggested recommendations were extracted through systematic search of published evidence and structured requests for expert opinion. Physicians [n = 238] identified as IBD specialists by publications or clinical focus on IBD were invited for discussion and recommendation modification [Barcelona, Spain; 2014]. Final recommendations were voted on by the group. Participants also completed an online survey to evaluate their own experience related to IBD units. RESULTS A total of 60% of attendees completed the survey, with 15% self-classifying their centre as a dedicated IBD unit. Only half of respondents indicated that they had a defined IBD treatment algorithm in place. Key recommendations included the need to develop a multidisciplinary team covering specifically-defined specialist expertise in IBD, to instil processes that facilitate cross-functional communication and to invest in shared care models of IBD management. CONCLUSIONS Optimising the setup of IBD units will require progressive leadership and willingness to challenge the status quo in order to provide better quality of care for our patients. IBD units are an important step towards harmonising care for IBD across Europe and for establishing standards for disease management programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edouard Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Iris Dotan
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Liat Mlynarsky
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Catherine Reenaers
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Damle RN, Alavi K. Risk factors for 30-d readmission after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. J Surg Res 2015. [PMID: 26216748 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Readmission rates after colorectal surgery remain an ongoing clinical concern. Recent initiation of penalties for excess readmissions in medical patients has encouraged surgeons to reduce readmissions for surgical patients. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature for the purpose of identifying patient-related risk factors for 30-d readmissions after colorectal surgery. METHODS PubMed and Web of Science were queried for relevant English-language studies published before January 1, 2015, evaluating 30-d hospital readmissions after colorectal surgery in adult patients. Studies were included in this review only if they used a multivariable model to assess various patient-associated predictors and were excluded if the study size was less than 100 patients. RESULTS A total of 20 clinical research studies made up of 8 (40%) chart reviews and 12 (60%) administrative data met inclusion criteria. Most studies took place in the United States, and a variety of procedures (e.g., colectomy, rectal resection, stoma creation) and indications for surgery (e.g., cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease) were evaluated. The average ages of included patients was between 37 and 78 y and 36%-97% were men. Readmission rates ranged from 9%-25%. Overall, older age, comorbid conditions, preoperative immunosuppressive therapy, postoperative complications, and nonhome discharge were the most consistent and strongest predictors of readmission. CONCLUSIONS These identifiable risk factors highlight targets for interventions in an effort to reduce unplanned readmissions. Determining the most efficacious and cost-efficient means to reduce these preventable hospitalizations could save millions of valuable health care dollars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle N Damle
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Myrelid P, Øresland T. A reappraisal of the ileo-rectal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9:433-8. [PMID: 25863275 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Colectomy is still frequently required in the care of ulcerative colitis. The most common indications are either non-responding colitis in the emergency setting, chronic active disease, steroid-dependent disease or neoplastic change like dysplasia or cancer. The use of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis has internationally been the gold standard, substituting the rectum with a pouch. Recently the use of the ileorectal anastomosis has increased in frequency as reconstructive method after subtotal colectomy. Data from centres using ileorectal anastomosis have shown the method to be safe, with functionality and risk of failure comparable to the ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The methods have different advantages as well as disadvantages, depending on a number of patient factors and where in life the patient is at time of reconstruction. The ileorectal anastomosis could, together with the Kock continent ileostomy, in selected cases be a complement to the ileal pouch anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis and should be discussed with the patient before deciding on reconstructive method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Tom Øresland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, and Department of GI Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Factors associated with 30-day readmission after restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA: a national study. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57:1371-8. [PMID: 25380002 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital readmission has been identified by many payers as a surrogate for surgical quality. The 30-day readmission rate and factors associated with hospital readmission after restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this work was to identify the rate of and factors associated with hospital readmission within 30 days of restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. DESIGN A retrospective review of patients undergoing IPAA from 2009 to 2012 in the University HealthSystem Consortium database was performed. Hospitals were stratified into quartiles according to the number of cases performed annually. SETTING This study was conducted using a national database of university hospitals. PATIENTS A total of 4952 patients within the 4-year study period were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measured was readmission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS The 30-day readmission rate was 22.8% overall, although high-volume centers performed significantly better than low-volume centers (high vs low volume: 19.7% vs 28.2%; p < 0.001). When controlling for confounding variables, multivariate analysis identified female sex (OR, 1.191; p = 0.02), government-based (vs private) insurance (OR, 1.364; p < 0.001), and higher preoperative severity of illness (OR, 1.491; p = 0.001) to be associated with readmission. In addition, a significant volume-dependent relationship on 30-day readmission was identified, wherein undergoing operation at the higher-volume hospitals was protective for predicting readmission. Hierarchical regression modeling indicated that 31% of the variation in readmission rates among individual hospitals was accounted for by hospital volume. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective nature and limited postoperative complication data. CONCLUSIONS The national 30-day readmission after IPAA creation was 22.8%, at least double that of other colorectal procedures. This high rate of readmission was mitigated by centers performing the highest volume of cases. Avoidance of referral to centers performing very few of these procedures annually may improve perioperative outcomes and reduce associated morbidity.
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinical and financial impact of hospital readmissions after colorectal resection: predictors, outcomes, and costs. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57:1421-9. [PMID: 25380009 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After passage of the Affordable Care Act, 30 -day hospital readmissions have come under greater scrutiny. Excess readmissions for certain medical conditions and procedures now result in penalizations on all Medicare reimbursements. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this work was to define the risk factors, outcomes, and costs of 30-day readmissions after colorectal surgery. DESIGN Adults undergoing colorectal surgery were studied using data from the University HealthSystem Consortium. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify patient-related risk factors for, and 30-day outcomes of, readmission after colorectal surgery. SETTINGS This study was conducted at an academic hospital and its affiliates. PATIENTS Adults ≥18 years of age who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer, diverticular disease, IBD, or benign tumors between 2008 and 2011 were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Readmission within 30 days of index discharge was the main outcome measured. RESULTS A total of 70,484 patients survived the index hospitalization after colorectal surgery; 9632 (13.7%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The strongest independent predictors of readmission were length of stay ≥4 days (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.32-1.57), stoma (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.46-1.51), and discharge to skilled nursing (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.49-1.76) or rehabilitation facility (OR 2.93; 95% CI 2.53-3.40). Of those readmitted, half of the readmissions occurred within 7 days, 13% required the intensive care unit, 6% had a reoperation, and 2% died during the readmission stay. The median combined total direct hospital cost was more than 2 times higher ($26,917 vs $13,817; p < 0.001) for readmitted than for nonreadmitted patients. LIMITATIONS Follow-up was limited to 30 days after initial discharge. CONCLUSIONS Readmissions after colorectal resection occur frequently and incur a significant financial burden on the health-care system. Future studies aimed at targeted interventions for high-risk patients may reduce readmissions and curb escalating health-care costs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Identification of process measures to reduce postoperative readmission. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18:1407-15. [PMID: 24912913 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2429-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 12/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Readmission rates after intestinal surgery have been notably high, ranging from 10 % for elective surgery to 21 % for urgent/emergent surgery. Other than adherence to established strategies for decreasing individual postoperative complications, there is little guidance available for providers to work toward reducing their postoperative readmission rates. STUDY DESIGN Processes of care that may affect postoperative readmissions were identified through a systematic literature review, assessment of existing guidelines, and semi-structured interviews with individuals who have expertise in hospital readmissions and surgical quality improvement. Eleven experts ranked potential process measures for validity on the basis of the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methodology. RESULTS Of 49 proposed process measures, 34 (69 %) were rated as valid. Of the 34 valid measures, two measures addressed care in the preoperative period. These included evaluation of patient's comorbidities, providing written instruction detailing the anticipated perioperative course, and communication with the patient's referring or primary care doctor. A measure addressing perioperative care stated that institutions should have a standardized perioperative care protocol. Additional measures focused on discharge instructions and communication. CONCLUSIONS An expert panel identified several aspects of care that are considered essential to quality patient care and important to reducing postoperative readmissions.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, present an ever increasing burden to the healthcare systems in the Western world. Scotland in particular has seen a significant increase in both diseases, particularly Crohn's disease. It is thus of paramount importance that secondary care services within Scotland are equipped to cope with this increased demand at a time when the treatment options are broadening, patients expectations are increasing and healthcare budgets face major restriction. This article outlines some aspects of optimal delivery of an IBD service in secondary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gaya
- Consultant Physician & Gastroenterologist, Gastroenterology Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Risk of cancer and secondary proctectomy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29:225-30. [PMID: 24292488 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1796-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of our retrospective study was to review the outcome of patients undergoing colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) due to familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in Finland during the last 50 years. METHODS The cumulative risk of rectal cancer and the rate of anus preservation were analyzed. A total of 140 FAP patients with previous colectomy combined with ileorectal anastomosis were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate cumulative risks. RESULTS Secondary proctectomy was performed for 39 (28 %) of 140 patients. The cumulative risk of secondary proctectomy was 53 % at 30 years after colectomy with IRA. A total of 17 (44 %) secondary proctectomies were performed due to cancer or suspicion of cancer, and another 17 (44 %) secondary proctectomies were performed due to uncontrollable rectal polyposis. During our study, the anus preservation rate in secondary proctectomies was 49 %. The cumulative risk of rectal cancer was 24 % at 30 years after colectomy with IRA. Therefore, the cumulative rectal cancer mortality 30 years after colectomy with IRA was 9 %. CONCLUSIONS Proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) should be favored as a primary operation for patients not having technical or medical contraindications for it because colectomy with IRA carried a rectal cancer risk of 13 % with a mortality of 7 % during our study, and because IPAA is likely to succeed better at earlier phase of the disease. Patients with attenuated FAP had no rectal cancer in our study, and they may form a group where IRA should still be the first choice as an exception.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
The position of surgery in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed in the era of biologics. Several important questions arise in determining the optimal positioning of surgery in the treatment of UC, which has long been a challenge facing gastroenterologists and surgeons. Surgery is life-saving in some patients and leads to better bowel function and better quality of life in most patients. The benefits of surgery, however, must be weighed against the potential surgical morbidity and compromised functioning that clearly can occur. The introduction of biologic therapy has added further complexity to decisions about medical management, surgery, and the relative timing of these choices. Appropriate medical management of UC may induce and maintain remission and may prevent surgery. However, medical management also carries risks of adverse effects, and recent data suggest that delay of surgery during ineffective medical therapy can increase the chances of negative surgical outcomes. To make individualized timely treatment decisions, early collaboration between gastroenterologists and surgeons is important and more data on predictors of treatment response and positive outcomes are needed. Early identification of patients who would benefit from biologic therapy or surgery is challenging.
Collapse
|
31
|
Faiz O, Burns E, Nicholls J. Authors' reply: Volume analysis of outcome following restorative proctocolectomy ( Br J Surg 2011; 98: 408–417). Br J Surg 2011. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- O Faiz
- Imperial College, London, UK
| | - E Burns
- Imperial College, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Maruthachalam K, Bunn SK, Jaffray B. Complications following restorative proctocolectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46:336-41. [PMID: 21292084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2010] [Accepted: 11/04/2010] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse outcomes following restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) in adults have been attributed to steroid exposure and use of hand-sutured anastomoses. This study analyses complications in children undergoing RPC. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of all children undergoing RPC in an English regional center over a 10-year period. The main outcome measure was defined as a complication within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used with possible explanatory variables (eg, steroid use, indication for surgery, weight and height z scores, hematologic indices, degree of blood loss, and use of laparoscopic surgery). RESULTS Sixty (33 female) patients underwent RPC at a median age of 13.5 years. Of these, 16 had an operative complication and 17 had a late complication. Only severe acute colitis with inability to induce remission as an indication for surgery was significant in predicting operative complications (odds ratio, 6.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-37]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS Severe acute colitis resistant to medical therapy but not steroid use or hand-sutured anastomoses appears to be a risk factor for complication. This differs from the adult experience.
Collapse
|
33
|
Burns EM, Bottle A, Aylin P, Clark SK, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, Nicholls RJ, Faiz O. Volume analysis of outcome following restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 98:408-17. [PMID: 21254018 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2010] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This observational study aimed to determine national provision and outcome following pouch surgery (restorative proctocolectomy, RPC) and to examine the effect of institutional and surgeon caseload on outcome. METHODS All patients undergoing primary RPC between April 1996 and March 2008 in England were identified from the administrative database Hospital Episode Statistics. Institutions and surgeons were categorized according to the total RPC caseload performed over the study interval. RESULTS Some 5771 primary elective pouch procedures were undertaken at 154 National Health Service hospital trusts. Median follow-up was 65 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 28-106) months. The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 0·5 per cent and the 1-year overall mortality rate 1·5 per cent. Some 30·5 per cent of trusts performed fewer than two procedures per year, and 91·4 per cent of surgical teams (456 of 499) carried out 20 or fewer RPCs over 8 years. Median surgeon volume was 4 (i.q.r. 1-9) cases. Failure occurred in 6·4 per cent of cases. Low-volume surgeons operated on more patients at the extremes of age (P < 0·001) and a lower proportion with ulcerative colitis (P < 0·001). Older age, increasing co-morbidity, increasing social deprivation, and both lower provider and surgeon caseload were independent predictors of longer length of stay. Older patient age and low institutional volume status were independent predictors of failure. CONCLUSION Many English institutions and surgeons carry out extremely low volumes of RPC surgery. Case selection differed significantly between high- and low-volume surgeons. Institutional volume and older age were positively associated with increased pouch failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Burns
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tekkis PP, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Smith JJ, Sagar PM, Shorthouse AJ, Mortensen NJ, Nicholls RJ. Long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy - a multi-centre study of patients from the UK National Ileal Pouch Registry. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12:433-41. [PMID: 19226364 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01816.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is little information on the long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC). The results of data submitted to a national registry were analysed. METHOD The UK National Pouch Registry was established in 2004. By 2006, it comprised data collected from ten centres between 1976 and 2006. The long-term failure and functional outcome were determined. Trends over time were assessed using the gamma statistic or the Kruskal-Wallis statistic wherever appropriate. RESULTS In all, 2491 patients underwent primary RPC over a median of 54 months (range 1 month to 28.9 years). Of these, 127 (5.1%) underwent abdominal salvage surgery. The incidence of failure (excision or indefinite diversion) was 7.7% following primary and 27.5% following salvage RPC (P < 0.001). The median frequency of defaecation/24 h was five including one at night. Nocturnal seepage occurred in 8% at 1 year, rising to 15.4% at 20 years (P = 0.037). Urgency was experienced by 5.1% of patients at 1 year rising to 9.1% at 15 years (P = 0.022). Stool frequency and the need for antidiarrhoeal medication were greater following salvage RPC. CONCLUSION In patients retaining anal function after RPC, frequency of defaecation was stable over 20 years. Faecal urgency and minor incontinence worsened with time. Function after salvage RPC was significantly worse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P P Tekkis
- Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the risk of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure and factors predictive of failure overall and in patients with septic complications. METHODS Patients were identified through a prospectively maintained patient registry. All patients registered in the Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease database who had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for more than 12 months were included in the study. Pouch failure was defined as ileal pouch-anal anastomosis excision or permanent diversion. Cox proportional hazard models with death as a competing risk were created, modeling time to failure as the outcome of interest for all patients and for the subgroup of patients with septic complications. RESULTS The study included 1,554 patients. One hundred six patients experienced an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure (6.8%), 49 (46.2%) of these failures were caused by septic complications. Independent predictors of failure included Crohn's disease (hazard ratio 7.5, 95% confidence interval [4.7, 12.0]) and postoperative sepsis (hazard ratio 6.6, 95% confidence interval [4.4, 9.8]). In the subgroup of patients with failure due to postoperative septic complications, independent predictors of failure were Crohn's disease (hazard ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval [1.3, 5.7]) and presence of a pouch fistula (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval [1.3, 5.2]). CONCLUSION Septic complications are the most common cause of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure. Careful patient selection and the prevention of septic complications may decrease the risk of this failure.
Collapse
|
36
|
Wasmuth HH, Tranø G, Endreseth B, Rydning A, Wibe A, Myrvold HE. Long-term surgical load in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11:711-8. [PMID: 19708089 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01671.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate surgical workload and complications in patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy, through long-term follow-up in one single institution. METHOD From 1984 to 2006, 304 consecutive patients underwent Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA). There were 182 stapled and 122 hand-sewn anastomoses. A protective loop ileostomy was established in 256 patients (84%), whereas 48 patients (16%) were without a covering stoma. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (10%) suffered from early anastomotic leakage. A protective stoma did not prevent early anastomotic dehiscence (P = 0.11) or the number of pelvic abscesses (P = 0.09). Early complications required 20 laparotomies with creation of a diverting stoma in nine patients. There were 16 (6%) complications related to closure of the loop ileostomy. Sixty-six patients needed an additional re-operation related to the IPAA procedure. There were 20 removals of pouches and three permanent diverting stomas. The estimated removal rate at 20 years of a functioning pouch was 11% (CI +/- 6). Altogether 100 (33%) patients had one or more surgical procedures, excluding dilations of anastomotic strictures and closing of a loop ileostomy. These 100 patients underwent 187 surgical procedures. The estimated rate of a first re-operation due to complications was 52% (CI +/- 16) in 20 years. Hand-sewn anastomoses had similar complications and failure rates as stapled anastomoses. CONCLUSIONS More than half of patients operated with restorative proctocolectomy will need surgical intervention within 20 years and the failure rate is more than 10%. The high risk of complications and failure inherent in the procedure should not be ignored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H H Wasmuth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Proximal diversion at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: current practices of North American colorectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52:1178-83. [PMID: 19581865 DOI: 10.1007/dcr.0b013e31819f24fc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pelvic sepsis is a serious complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis that may lead to pouch failure or poor function. Although a temporary loop ileostomy may be created at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to prevent or minimize the consequences of an anastomotic leak, research has suggested that an ileostomy can be safely omitted in selected patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of proximal diversion by colorectal surgeons at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. METHODS A questionnaire was mailed to all practicing fellows of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons in North America. Surgeons were asked to describe their typical practice for a number of clinical scenarios. RESULTS Questionnaires were mailed to 913 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons fellows, and 63 percent responded. For a patient who has had a prior colectomy and is not taking steroids, 27 percent of surgeons would perform ileal pouch-anal anastomosis alone, and 73 percent would perform ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a loop ileostomy. For a patient who has not had previous surgery and is taking prednisone 40 mg/day, 16 percent of surgeons would perform a subtotal colectomy with an end ileostomy, 82 percent would perform a total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a loop ileostomy, and 2 percent would perform a total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without an ileostomy. There was no relationship between practice setting, annual ileal pouch-anal anastomosis volume, or years in practice and surgeon response for either scenario. CONCLUSIONS The majority of surgeons create a temporary loop ileostomy at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kaplan GG, McCarthy EP, Ayanian JZ, Korzenik J, Hodin R, Sands BE. Impact of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity and mortality following a colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:680-7. [PMID: 18242604 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2007] [Accepted: 12/13/2007] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Postoperative morbidity and mortality following a colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) has been primarily reported from tertiary care referral centers that perform a high volume of operations; however, the postoperative outcomes among nonselected hospitals are not known. We set out to evaluate postoperative morbidity and mortality using a nationally representative database and to determine the factors that influenced outcomes. METHODS We analyzed the 1995-2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify 7108 discharges for UC patients who underwent a total abdominal colectomy. The effects of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated in logistic regression models adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 2.3% and 30.8%, respectively. Most operations were performed in low-volume hospitals that had an increased risk of death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-4.63). In-hospital mortality was increased in patients who were admitted emergently (aOR, 5.40; 95% CI: 3.48-8.40), aged 60-80 years (aOR, 8.70; 95% CI: 3.30-22.92), and those with Medicaid (aOR, 4.29; 95% CI: 2.13-8.66). Emergently admitted UC patients whose surgery was performed 6 days after their admission had significantly increased likelihood of in-hospital death (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI: 1.13-3.97). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative mortality was lowest in hospitals that performed the highest volume of operations. Increasing the proportion of total colectomies performed in high-volume hospitals may improve clinical outcomes for patients with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilaad G Kaplan
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 1977, restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) has evolved into the surgical treatment of choice for most patients with intractable ulcerative colitis. Construction of an ileal pouch reservoir is now standard, usually in the form of J pouch (IPAA). The aim of this report is to review selection criteria for, and functional outcomes, follow-up and management of complications of IPAA after 30 years of widespread clinical application. METHODS AND RESULTS Literature published in English on the clinical indications, surgical technique, morbidity, complications and outcome following IAA and IPAA was sourced by electronic search, performed independently by two reviewers who selected potentially relevant papers based on title and abstract. Additional articles were identified by cross-referencing from papers retrieved in the initial search. CONCLUSION The functional results of IPAA are good. Pouchitis, irritable pouch syndrome and cuffitis are specific long-term complications but rarely result in failure. Pouch salvage is possible in selected patients with poor functional outcomes. One-stage operations are increasingly performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B B McGuire
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|