Pouch failures following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Creation of an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) considering ileoanal pouch surgery

Background

Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most established restorative operative approach for patients with ulcerative colitis. It has associated morbidity and the potential for major repercussions on quality of life. As such, patient selection is crucial to its success. The main aim of this paper is to present an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment and patient selection in those considering IPAA.

Methods

A literature review was performed to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications, decreased functional outcomes/quality of life, and pouch failure after IPAA. Based on this, a preliminary checklist was devised and modified through an iterative process. This was then evaluated by a consensus group comprising the pouch multidisciplinary team (MDT) core members.

Results

The final preoperative checklist includes assessment for risk factors such as gender, advanced age, obesity, comorbidities, sphincteric impairment, Crohn's disease and pelvic radiation therapy. In addition, essential steps in the decision-making process, such as pouch nurse counselling and discussion regarding surgical alternatives, are also included. The last step of the checklist is discussion at a dedicated pouch-MDT.

Discussion

A preoperative checklist may support clinicians with the selection of patients that are suitable for pouch surgery. It also serves as a useful tool to inform the discussion of cases at the MDT meeting.

Ouch, my pouch! a clinician's guide to pouchitis

Pouchitis is defined as inflammation of the ileal pouch created during a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Although the incidence of this inflammatory condition is high, the exact etiology often remains unclear and the management challenging. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of this common complication.

High but decreasing rates of reconstruction after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and evidence of a direct volume outcome relationship

BACKGROUND

Total (procto)colectomy is indicated in 15%-20% of ulcerative colitis(UC) patients during their disease course. Reconstruction options to avoid a permanent ileostomy include an ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). This study aimed to investigate reconstruction rates using Australian-based population-level data, and factors influencing reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. Patients with UC who underwent total (procto)colectomy with a minimum of 1-year follow up were included. The main outcome was reconstruction with either IPAA or IRA. The influence of hospital and patient factors on reconstruction rates was assessed by Cox regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 1047 patients underwent a (procto)colectomy for UC (mean age 45.9 years [SD ± 18.3], 640 [61.1%] male). The 5-year reconstruction rate was 55% (IPAA 89%). Advanced age, emergent colectomy, higher comorbidity burden, and geographical remoteness were significantly associated with lower reconstruction rates. A lower reconstruction rate was also observed in the most recent time-period (2014-2019) (aHR 0.68[95% CI 0.54-0.86]), and where index (procto)colectomy was performed in low-volume (<1 pouch/year) pouch hospitals (aHR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.82]).

CONCLUSIONS

NSW Australia has the highest reported rate of reconstruction following UC (procto)colectomy globally. However, rates reduced in the most recent time-period. There was variation in reconstruction rates across centres, with primary and overall reconstruction rates proportionate to hospital pouch volume. Reconstruction rates were also lower for patients living outside major cities. To ensure equitable opportunities for reconstruction, patients being considered for IBD pouch surgery should be centralized to a limited number of specialist pouch centres.

Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Ileoanal Pouch Surgery: a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To summarise frequency, type, and heterogeneity of patient-reported outcomes measures [PROMs] in papers reporting on outcomes after ileal pouch anal anastomosis [IPAA].

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of ulcerative colitis [UC] has risen in Western countries, and one in three patients requires surgery. IPAA is a frequently performed procedure for UC, and a lack of standardisation is manifest in reporting outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] despite the clear need for inclusion of PROMs as primary outcomes in IBD trials.

METHODS

Scopus, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for studies investigating outcomes in IPAA surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of studies reporting outcomes for IPAA surgery for UC, which included PROMs.

RESULTS

The search identified a total of 8028 studies which, after de-duplication and exclusion, were reduced to 79 articles assessing outcomes after IPAA surgery. In all 44 [55.7%] reported PROMs, with 23 including validated questionnaires and 21 papers using authors' questions, 22 different PROMs were identified, with bowel function as the most investigated item. The majority of studies [67/79, 85%] were retrospective, only 14/79 [18%] were prospective papers and only two were [2.5%] randomised, controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Only half of the papers reviewed used PROMs. The main reported item is bowel function and urogenital, social, and psychological functions are the most neglected. There is lack of standardisation for use of PROMs in IPAA. Complexity of UC and of outcomes after IPAA demands a change in clinical practice and follow-up, given how crucial PROMs are, compared with their non-routine use.

Routine diversion following delayed IPAA construction does not reduce the incidence of pouch-related sepsis or failure in patients with ulcerative colitis

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare modified 2-stage and 3-stage IPAA construction techniques to evaluate the effect of diverting loop ileostomy following completion proctectomy and IPAA for ulcerative colitis. In addition, our overall institutional experience was reviewed to describe long-term outcomes and changes in staging trends over time.

METHODS

Our institutional database was searched to identify all cases of IPAA for ulcerative colitis between 1981 and 2018. Patient, pouch and outcome characteristics were abstracted. Primary study outcomes were the incidence of primary pouch failure and pouch-related sepsis. Failure was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival over time. The adjusted effect of pouch stage was evaluated using multivariable Cox and logistic regression models. Exploratory analysis evaluated the effect of stage on failure in the pouch related sepsis subgroup.

RESULTS

A total of 2105 patients underwent primary IPAA over the study period. The 5, 10 and 20-year pouch survival probabilities were 95.2%, 92.7% and 86.6%. The incidence of pouch related sepsis was 12.3%. Adjusted analysis demonstrated no difference in pouch failure (HR = 0.64: 95% 0.39-1.07, p = 0.09) or post-operative sepsis (aOR = 0.79: 95% CI 0.53-1.17, p = 0.24) by stage of construction. Among patients experiencing pouch sepsis, there was no difference in Kaplan-Meier estimates of pouch survival by stage (p = 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch related sepsis and IPAA failure did not differ between modified 2-stage and 3-stage construction techniques. Among the sub-group of patients experiencing pouch related sepsis, there was no difference in failure between groups. The results suggest diverting ileostomy may be safely avoided following delayed pouch reconstruction in appropriately selected patients.

Population outcomes, trends and the future of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: a 19-year New South Wales data linkage study

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the gold standard reconstructive option in ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent efforts to improve pouch outcomes have seen a push towards centralisation of surgery. This study aimed to document outcomes following pouch surgery at a population level within New South Wales (NSW), and identify factors associated with, and temporal trends of these outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. The primary outcome was pouch failure in patients with UC who underwent IPAA. The influence of hospital level factors (including annual volume) and patient demographic variables on this outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modelling. Temporal trends in annual volume and evidence for centralisation over the studied period were assessed using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

The annual volume of UC pouches reduced over the study period. The pouch failure rates were 8.6% (95% CI 6.3-10.8%) and 10.6% (95% CI 8.0-13.1%) at 5- and 10-years, respectively. Increasing age and non-elective admission were associated with higher failure rates. One-third of UC pouches (31.6%) were performed in a single institution, which averaged 6.5 pouches/year throughout the study period. Three-quarters (19/25) of NSW public hospitals who performed pouches performed less than one UC pouch annually.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes following UC pouch surgery in NSW are comparable with global standards. Concentrating IBD pouch surgery with the aim of producing specialist surgical teams may be a reasonable way forward in NSW and would ensure equity of access and facilitate research and training collaboration.

Short-term outcomes following total colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease in Denmark after implementation of laparoscopy: a nationwide population-based study

AIM

A laparoscopic approach to total colectomy (TC) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is being increasingly used, but data on its comparative benefits over open TC are conflicting. The aim of this study was to examine 90-day outcomes following laparoscopic and open TC for IBD in a nationwide cohort after the introduction of laparoscopy.

METHOD

IBD patients undergoing TC in Denmark from 2005 to 2017 were identified from the Danish National Patient Registry. We used Kaplan-Meier methodology to estimate mortality and Cox regression analysis to estimate adjusted mortality rate ratios (aMRRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of reoperation, readmission and intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, comparing patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open TC.

RESULTS

We identified 1095 patients undergoing laparoscopic TC and 1523 patients undergoing open TC. Following emergency TC, 90-day mortality was 2.8% (1.6%-4.9%) after laparoscopic TC and 9.1% (7.0%-11.8%) after open TC. Ninety-day mortality was 0.9% (0.3%-2.5%) after laparoscopic TC and 2.6% (1.5%-4.3%) after open elective TC. The aMRRs associated with laparoscopic TC were 0.45 (95% CI 0.25-0.80) in emergency cases and 0.29 (95% CI 0.10-0.86) in elective cases. Risks of readmission were comparable following laparoscopic versus open TC, both in emergency [aHR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.76-1.15)] and elective [aHR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.68-1.02)] cases, while risks of ICU transfer and reoperation were lower following laparoscopic TC, both in emergency cases [aHR = 0.53 (95% CI 0.35-0.82) and aHR = 0.26 (95% CI 0.15-0.47)] and elective [aHR = 0.58 (95% CI 0.35-0.95) and aHR = 0.37 (95% CI 0.21-0.66)] cases.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of laparoscopic TC for IBD in Denmark was not associated with increased mortality or morbidity. In fact, laparoscopic TC for IBD may be associated with lower short-term mortality and morbidity compared with open TC.

Ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a lifelong inflammatory disease affecting the rectum and colon to a variable extent. In 2023, the prevalence of ulcerative colitis was estimated to be 5 million cases around the world, and the incidence is increasing worldwide. Ulcerative colitis is thought to occur in people with a genetic predisposition following environmental exposures; gut epithelial barrier defects, the microbiota, and a dysregulated immune response are strongly implicated. Patients usually present with bloody diarrhoea, and the diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, biological, endoscopic, and histological findings. The aim of medical management is, first, to induce a rapid clinical response and normalise biomarkers and, second, to maintain clinical remission and reach endoscopic normalisation to prevent long-term disability. Treatments for inducing remission include 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs and corticosteroids. Maintenance treatments include 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs, thiopurines, biologics (eg, anti-cytokines and anti-integrins), and small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators). Although the therapeutic options are expanding, 10-20% of patients still require proctocolectomy for medically refractory disease. The keys to breaking through this therapeutic ceiling might be the combination of therapeutics with precision and personalised medicine.

Predictors of pouch failure: A tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease centre experience

AIM

Rates of pouch failure after total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) range from 5% to 18%. There is little consistency across studies regarding the factors associated with failure, and most include patients who underwent IPAA in the pre-biologic era. Our aim was to analyse a cohort of patients who underwent IPAA in the biologic era at a large-volume inflammatory bowel disease institution to better determine preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors associated with pouch failure.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed with data from an institutional review board approved prospective database with ulcerative colitis or unclassified inflammatory bowel disease patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with IPAA at Mount Sinai Hospital between 2008 and 2017. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were collected and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with increased risk of pouch failure.

RESULTS

Out of 664 patients included in the study, pouch failure occurred in 41 (6.2%) patients, a median of 23.3 months after final surgical stage. Of these, 17 (41.4%) underwent pouch excision and 24 (58.5%) had diverting ileostomies. The most common indications for pouch failure were Crohn's disease like pouch inflammation (CDLPI) (n = 17, 41.5%), chronic pouchitis (n = 6, 14.6%), chronic cuffitis (n = 5, 12.2%) and anastomotic stricture (n = 4, 9.8%). On multivariate analysis, pre-colectomy biologic use (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% CI 1.09-4.67), CDLPI (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.49-6.76) and pouch revision (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.26-5.32) were significantly associated with pouch failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch failure was significantly associated with CDLPI, preoperative biologic use and pouch revision; however, reassuringly it was not associated with postoperative complications.

High incidence of surgery and initiation of medical therapies after colectomy for ulcerative colitis or inflammatory bowel disease unclassified

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite novel medical therapies, colectomy has a role in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU). This study aimed to determine the incidence of unplanned surgery and initiation of immunomodulatory or biologic therapy (IMBT) after colectomy in patients with UC or IBDU, and identify associated factors.

METHODS

Data of patients with preoperative diagnosis of UC or IBDU who underwent colectomy and were followed up at a single tertiary centre was retrospectively collected. The primary outcome was the risk of unplanned surgery and initiation of IMBT during follow-up after colectomy. Secondary outcomes were development of Crohn's disease-like (CDL) complications and failure of reconstructive techniques.

RESULTS

68 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 9.9 years, 32.4% of patients underwent unplanned surgery and IMBT was started in 38.2%. Unplanned surgery-free survival was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73.8-91.6%) at 1 year, 76% (95% CI 63.2-84.9%) at 5 years and 69.1% (95% CI 55-79.6%) at 10 years. IMBT-free survival was 96.9% (95% CI 88.2-99.2%) at 1 year, 77.6% (95% CI 64.5-86.3%) at 5 years and 63.3% (95% CI 48.8-74.7%) at 10 years. 29.4% of patients met criteria for CDL complications. CDL complications were significantly associated to IMBT (hazard ratio 4.5, 95% CI 2-10.1).

CONCLUSION

In a retrospective study, we found a high incidence of unplanned surgery and IMBT therapy initiation after colectomy among patients with UC or IBDU. These results further question the historical concept of surgery as a "definitive" treatment.

Transabdominal IPAA Revision: Does Indication Dictate Outcome?

BACKGROUND

Following IPAA failure, select patients are eligible for IPAA revision. Presently, there is limited evidence describing long-term revision outcomes and predictors of revision failure. This represents an important knowledge gap when selecting and counseling patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to define long-term IPAA survival outcomes after transabdominal IPAA revision and identify preoperative clinical factors associated with revision failure.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

This study included all patients who underwent revisional IPAA surgery between 1982 and 2017 for pouch failure.

INTERVENTION

Transabdominal IPAA revision was included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was pouch failure, defined as pouch excision or permanent pouch diversion, after IPAA revision.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients (64.2% women) were included with a median age of 36 years (interquartile range, 28.5-46.5) at revision. Eighty percent of patients had a primary diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. The most common indication for revision was leak/pelvic sepsis, representing 41% of the cohort, followed by pouch-vaginal fistula (22.2%), mechanical factors (20.4%), and poor pouch function (14.6%). During the study period, 56 patients (35.2%) experienced pouch failure. The 3-year pouch survival probability was 82.3% (95% CI, 75.5%-87.5%), 5-year pouch survival probability was 77.2% (95% CI, 69.8%-83.0%), and 10-year pouch survival probability was 70.6% (95% CI, 62.6%-77.2%). Compared to mechanical factors, pouch failure was significantly associated with pelvic sepsis (HR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.50-12.0) and pouch-vaginal fistula (HR, 4.37; 95% CI, 1.47-12.99). No significant association was found between revision failure and previous revision, redo ileoanal anastomosis, or new pouch construction.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Revisional IPAA can be undertaken with favorable long-term outcomes at high-volume centers. Consideration should be given to indication for revision when counseling patients regarding the risk of failure. Further research on risk stratifying patients before revision is required. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B966 .

REVISIN DE LA ANASTOMOSIS ANAL DE LA BOLSA ILEAL TRANSABDOMINAL LA INDICACIN DICTA EL RESULTADO

ANTECEDENTES:Después de la falla en la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal, los pacientes seleccionados son elegibles para la revisión de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal. Actualmente, hay evidencias limitadas que describen los resultados de la revisión a largo plazo y los predictores del fracaso de la revisión. Esto representa un importante vacío de investigación a la hora de seleccionar y asesorar a los pacientes.OBJETIVO:Definir los resultados de supervivencia a largo plazo de la IPAA después de la revisión de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal transabdominal e identificar los factores clínicos preoperatorios asociados con el fracaso de la revisión.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de referencia terciario.PARTICIPANTES:Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a una cirugía de revisión de la anastomosis ileoanal del reservorio entre 1982 y 2017, por falla del reservorio.INTERVENCIÓN:Revisión de la anastomosis de reservorio ileoanal transabdominal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario es el fracaso del reservorio, definido como escisión del reservorio o derivación permanente del reservorio, después de la revisión de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 159 pacientes (64,2% mujeres) con una mediana de edad a la revisión de 36 años (RIC: 28,5-46,5). El ochenta por ciento tenía un diagnóstico primario de colitis ulcerosa. La indicación más común para la revisión fue la fuga/sepsis pélvica, que representó el 41 % de la cohorte, seguida de la fístula vaginal del reservorio (22,2 %), factores mecánicos (20,4 %) y mala función del reservorio 14,6 %. Durante el período de estudio, 56 pacientes (35,2 %) experimentaron fallas en la bolsa. Las probabilidades de supervivencia de la bolsa a los 3, 5 y 10 años fueron del 82,3% (IC del 95%: 75,5%-87,5%), del 77,2% (IC del 95%: 69,8%-83,0%) y del 70,6% (IC del 95%: 62,6%- 77,2%), respectivamente. En comparación con los factores mecánicos, la falla de la bolsa se asoció significativamente con sepsis pélvica (HR = 4,25, IC del 95 %: 1,50 a 12,0) y fístula vaginal de la bolsa (HR = 4,37, IC del 95 %: 1,47 a 12,99). No hubo una asociación significativa entre el fracaso de la revisión y la revisión previa, el rehacer la anastomosis ileoanal o la construcción de una nueva bolsa.LIMITACIONES:El estudio está limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La revisión de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal se puede realizar con resultados favorables a largo plazo en centros de alto volumen. Se debe considerar la indicación de revisión al asesorar a los pacientes sobre el riesgo de fracaso. Se requiere investigación adicional sobre la estratificación del riesgo de los pacientes antes de la revisión. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B966 . (Traducción - Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).

Long-term outcomes after close rectal dissection and total mesorectal excision in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

During ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC), rectal dissection can be performed via close rectal dissection (CRD) or in a total mesorectal excision plane (TME). Although CRD should protect autonomic nerve function, this technique may be more challenging than TME. The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of patients undergoing CRD and TME.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent IPAA surgery for UC between January 2002 and October 2017. Primary outcomes were chronic pouch failure (PF) among patients who underwent CRD and TME and the association between CRD and developing chronic PF. Chronic PF was defined as a pouch-related complication occurring ≥ 3 months after primary IPAA surgery requiring redo pouch surgery, pouch excision or permanent defunctioning ileostomy. Secondary outcomes were risk factors and causes for chronic PF. Pouch function and quality of life were assessed via the Pouch dysfunction score and Cleveland global quality of life score.

RESULTS

Out of 289 patients (155 males, median age 37 years [interquartile range 26.5-45.5 years]), 128 underwent CRD. There was a shorter median postoperative follow-up for CRD patients than for TME patients (3.7 vs 10.9 years, p < 0.01). Chronic PF occurred in 6 (4.7%) CRD patients and 20 (12.4%) TME patients. The failure-free pouch survival rate 3 years after IPAA surgery was comparable among CRD and TME patients (96.1% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.5). CRD was a no predictor for developing chronic PF on univariate analyses (HR 0.7 CI-95 0.3-2.0, p = 0.54). A lower proportion of CRD patients developed chronic PF due to a septic cause (1% vs 6%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although differences in chronic PF among CRD and TME patients were not observed, a trend toward TME patients developing chronic pelvic sepsis was detected. Surgeons may consider performing CRD during IPAA surgery for UC.

Leaks From the Tip of the J-pouch: Diagnosis, Management, and Long-term Pouch Survival

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis is restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch. Leaks from the tip of the J-pouch are a known complication, but there is a paucity of literature regarding this type of leak.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the diagnosis, management, and long-term clinical outcomes of leaks from the tip of the J-pouch at our institution.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained pouch registry.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a quaternary IBD referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients included those with ileal J-pouches diagnosed with leaks from the tip of the J-pouch.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main measures of outcomes were pouch salvage rate, type of salvage procedures, and long-term Kaplan-Meier pouch survival.

RESULTS

We identified 74 patients with leaks from the tip of the J-pouch. Pain (68.9%) and pelvic abscess (40.9%) were the most common presentations, whereas 10.8% of patients presented with an acute abdomen. The leak was diagnosed by imaging and/or endoscopy in 74.3% of patients but only discovered during surgical exploration in 25.6% of patients. Some 63.5% of patients were diagnosed only after loop ileostomy closure, whereas 32.4% of patients were diagnosed before ileostomy closure. The most common methods used for diagnosis were pouchoscopy (31.1%) and gastrograffin enema (28.4%). A definitive nonoperative approach was attempted in 48.6% of patients but was successful in only 10.8% of patients overall. Surgical repair was attempted in 89.2% of patients, whereas 4.5% of patients had pouch excision. Salvage operations (n = 63) included sutured or stapled repair of the tip of the J (65%), pouch excision with neo-pouch (25.4%), and pouch disconnection, repair, and reanastomosis (9.5%). Ultimately' 10 patients (13.5%) required pouch excision, yielding an overall 5-year pouch survival rate of 86.3%.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective review; referral bias may limit the generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Leaks from the tip of the J-pouch have variable clinical presentations and require a high index of suspicion. Pouch salvage surgery is required in the majority of patients and is associated with a high pouch salvage rate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C50 .

FUGAS DEL EXTREMO DE LA BOLSA EN J DIAGNSTICO, MANEJO Y SUPERVIVENCIA A LARGO PLAZO DE LA BOLSA

ANTECEDENTES:El estándar de atención para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la colitis ulcerosa es la proctocolectomía restauradora con bolsa ileal en J. Las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J son una complicación conocida, pero hay escasez de literatura sobre este tipo de fuga.OBJETIVO:Describir el diagnóstico, manejo y resultados clínicos a largo plazo de las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J en nuestra institución.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de registro de bolsa mantenido prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal cuaternaria.PACIENTES:Pacientes con bolsas ileales en J diagnosticadas con fugas del extremo de la J.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Tasa de rescate de la bolsa, tipo de procedimientos de rescate y supervivencia a largo plazo de la bolsa Kaplan-Meier.RESULTADOS:Identificamos 74 pacientes con fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J. El dolor (68,9%) y el absceso pélvico (40,9%) fueron las presentaciones más comunes, mientras que el 10,8% de los pacientes presentaron abdomen agudo. La fuga se diagnosticó por imagen y/o endoscopia en el 74,3%, pero solo se descubrió durante la exploración quirúrgica en el 25,6%. El 63,5% fueron diagnosticados solo después del cierre de la ileostomía en asa, mientras que el 32,4% lo fueron antes del cierre de la ileostomía. Los métodos más comunes utilizados para el diagnóstico fueron la endoscopia (31,1%) y el enema de gastrografín (28,4%). Se intentó un abordaje no quirúrgico definitivo en el 48,6%, pero tuvo éxito en solo el 10,8% de los pacientes en general. Se intentó la reparación quirúrgica en el 89,2% de los pacientes, mientras que en el 4,5% se realizó la escisión del reservorio. Las operaciones de rescate (n = 63) incluyeron la reparación con sutura o grapas del extremo de la J (65%), la escisión del reservorio con neo-reservorio (25,4%) y la desconexión, reparación y reanastomosis del reservorio (9,5%). Finalmente, 10 (13,5%) pacientes requirieron la escisión de la bolsa, lo que se asocio con una alta tasa de supervivencia general de la bolsa a los 5 años del 86,3%.LIMITACIONES:Revisión retrospectiva; el sesgo de referencia puede limitar la generalización.CONCLUSIONES:Las fugas del extremo de la bolsa en J tienen presentaciones clínicas variables y requieren un alto índice de sospecha. La cirugía de rescate de la bolsa se requiere en la mayoría y se asocia con una alta tasa de rescate de la bolsa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C50 . (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in the Older Adult: a Review of Postoperative Outcomes and Pouchitis Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the preferred surgical treatment for patients with medically refractive ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous studies have suggested that outcomes of this procedure may be worse in older patients; however, more recent reports have suggested that IPAA in select patients is safe, feasible, and results in good quality of life. In this review, we discuss the recent literature surrounding clinical considerations and treatment management of IPAA in older adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

IPAA complication rates and adverse events are similar in the older adult population, as compared to the younger adult patient population. Although fecal urgency and incontinence may be more common among older adults, chronological age alone is not a contraindication for IPAA surgery, as good quality of life can still be achieved. In this review, we will also discuss the development of pouchitis after IPAA, particularly among older adults, as the emergence of newer biologic drugs has shifted the treatment landscape.

SUMMARY

IPAA can be a safe and effective treatment modality for older adults with UC, with high self-reported patient satisfaction. Patient optimization and careful case selection are vital to achieving these outcomes, and specialized preoperative assessments and counseling can help facilitate the proper treatment.

Transanal ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The incidence of pediatric onset ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing, with increasing rate of children eventually requiring surgical treatment. Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment. Although transanal IPAA (ta-IPAA) is becoming widely accepted for adult UC patients, data regarding this procedure in children are scarce. Nevertheless, some adult publications also include patients under 18 years old. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize surgical and functional outcomes following ta-IPAA, and extract conclusion regarding pediatric UC patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of science and Google Scholar databases were searched, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines. The final search was updated in April 2022. Four comparative cohorts (n = 868) and 11 non-comparative case series (n = 241) were included. Six reports included children. Anastomotic leak, complications, operative time, conversion rate, length of stay and functional outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 1103 patients, ranging 9-79 years were included in this review. We found no difference in risk for anastomotic leak (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.46-4.06), minor and major complications (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48-1.76 and OR 0.78 95% CI 0.36-1.69, respectively) comparing ta-IPAA to transabdominal IPAA. Short- and long-term follow-up showed satisfying functional outcomes and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that ta-IPAA is not inferior to transabdominal IPAA. Implementation of this method in children is technically feasible due to familiarity with the dissection plane. Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life are paramount in the pediatric population and should be particularly investigated. Multicenter prospective studies are required to investigate pediatric UC patients undergoing ta-IPAA.

Ileoanal Pouch Syndrome Is Common and Associated With Significant Disability in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing IPAA

BACKGROUND

Recently, ileoanal pouch syndrome (IPS) has been proposed and defined according to a series of patient-centered bowel symptoms and consequences after ileoanal pouch surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of IPS and the related disability in UC patients undergoing IPAA.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

This study was conducted in a tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Data of 128 UC-related IPAA from October 2014 to May 2021 were collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were prevalence of IPS.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight patients were enrolled with a median postoperative follow-up of 2.64 (IQR, 1.31-3.80) years. The prevalence of IPS and its constituent symptoms and consequences are lower for patients with longer follow-up after ileostomy reversal. Fecal incontinence and pad usage had the greatest impact on the quality of life affecting 29% and 31% of patients. IPS group had a significantly higher IBD-Disability Index score compared to the non-IPS group (27.25 vs 12.15, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that 4 symptoms (fecal incontinence, clustering, fragmentation and incomplete evacuation, and nocturnal symptoms) and 2 consequences (pad usage and negative mental alterations) were associated with increased IBD-Disability Index (p < 0.05). For patients followed-up for >2 years, multivariate analysis showed that male gender (OR, 4.485; 95% CI, 1.354-14.857; p = 0.014), preoperative duration of disease (OR, 1.013; 95% CI, 1.001-1.025; p = 0.031), and postoperative follow-up (OR, 0.462; 95% CI, 0.244-0.876; p = 0.049) were independently associated with IPS.

LIMITATIONS

This is a single-center cross-sectional study rather than a prospective multicenter large longitudinal study.

CONCLUSIONS

IPS is a common situation negatively affecting the quality of life for patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing IPAA, and its rate decreased over time from ileal pouch surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C41.

EL SNDROME DEL RESERVORIO ILEOANAL ES COMN Y EST ASOCIADO CON UNA DISCAPACIDAD SIGNIFICATIVA EN PACIENTES CON CU CON RESERVORIO ILEAL Y ANASTOMOSIS RESERVORIOANAL

ANTECEDENTES:Recientemente se propuso y definió el síndrome del reservorio ileoanal de acuerdo con una serie de síntomas intestinales centrados en el paciente y las consecuencias después de la cirugía del reservorio ileoanal.OBJETIVO:El propósito de este estudio fue investigar la prevalencia del síndrome del reservorio ileoanal y la discapacidad relacionada en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa con reservorio ileal y anastomosis reservorio-anal.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio transversal.ESCENARIO:Este estudio se realizó en un centro terciario.PACIENTES:Se recopilaron datos de 128 pacientes con reservorio ileal por colitis ulcerosa desde octubre de 2014 hasta mayo de 2021.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados primarios fueron la prevalencia del síndrome del reservorio ileoanal.RESULTADOS:Ciento veintiocho pacientes fueron reclutados con una mediana de seguimiento postoperatorio de 2,64 (IQR, 1,31-3,80) años. La prevalencia del síndrome del reservorio ileoanal y sus síntomas y consecuencias constituyentes es menor para los pacientes con un seguimiento más prolongado después de la reversión de la ileostomía. La incontinencia fecal y el uso de compresas tuvieron el mayor impacto en la calidad de vida, afectando al 29% y al 31% de los pacientes. El grupo con síndrome del reservorio ileoanal tuvo una puntuación del índice de discapacidad por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal significativamente más alta en comparación con el grupo sin síndrome del reservorio ileoanal (27,25 frente a 12,15, p <0,001). El análisis multivariado mostró que 4 síntomas (incontinencia fecal, agrupamiento, fragmentación y evacuación incompleta y síntomas nocturnos) y 2 consecuencias (uso de toallas higiénicas y alteraciones mentales negativas) se asociaron con un aumento del índice de discapacidad por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (p <0,05). Para los pacientes seguidos durante más de dos años, el análisis multivariado mostró que el sexo masculino (OR, 4,485; IC 95%, 1,354-14,857; p = 0,014), la duración preoperatoria de la enfermedad (OR, 1,013; IC 95%, 1,001-1,025; p = 0,031) y el seguimiento postoperatorio (OR, 0,462; IC 95%, 0,244-0,876; p = 0,049) se asociaron de forma independiente con el síndrome del reservorio ileoanal.LIMITACIONES:Este es un estudio transversal de un solo centro en lugar de un gran estudio longitudinal prospectivo multicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:El síndrome del reservorio ileoanal es una situación común que afecta negativamente la calidad de vida de los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa sometidos a anastomosis del reservorio ileal-anal, y su tasa disminuyó con el tiempo a partir de la cirugía del reservorio ileal. El sexo masculino y la mayor duración preoperatoria de la enfermedad son factores de riesgo importantes para el síndrome del reservorio ileoanal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C41. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio).

Pelvic Pouch Failure: Treatment Options

Up to 30% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require surgical management of their disease during their lifetime. An ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard of care, giving patients the ability to be free from UC's bowel disease and avoid a permanent ostomy. Despite surgical advancements, a minority of patients will still experience pouch failure which can be debilitating and often require further surgical interventions. Signs and symptoms of pouch failure should be addressed with the appropriate workup and treatment plans formulated according with the patient's wishes. This article will discuss the identification, workup, and treatment options for pouch failure after IPAA.

Current Perspectives on Indications for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Older Patients

The population of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is expected to continue to increase in the coming decades, which necessitates and improved understanding of the critical issues faced by patients in this population. Although restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA remains the surgical procedure of choice for the majority of patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and UC-related dysplasia, the evidence surrounding surgery for older patients UC remains sparse. In particular, comparisons of outcomes among older and younger patients undergoing IPAA and comparisons between older patients undergoing IPAA and those undergoing proctocolectomy with end ileostomy remain an understudied and important issue, as evidence in this area will be used to guide patient-centered surgical choices among older patients who require colectomy for UC. In this narrative review, we review the available literature regarding IPAA for older patients, as well as the pre-, peri-, and postoperative factors that may influence outcomes in this population.

Primary Versus Staged Reconstruction and Risk of Surgical Failure in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: a Nation-wide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Restorative surgery after colectomy due to ulcerative colitis (UC) may be performed simultaneously with colectomy (primary) or as a staged procedure. Risk factors for failure after restorative surgery are not fully explored. This study aimed to compare the risk of failure after primary and staged reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a national register-based cohort study of all patients 15 to 69 years old in Sweden treated with colectomy due to UC and who received an ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) between 1997 and 2017. Failure was defined as a reoperation with new ileostomy after restorative surgery or a remaining defunctioning ileostomy after 2 years. Risk of failure was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression adjusted for sex, age, calendar period, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and duration of UC.

RESULTS

Of 2172 included patients, 843 (38.8%) underwent primary reconstruction, and 1329 (61.2%) staged reconstruction. Staged reconstruction was associated with a decreased risk of failure compared with primary reconstruction (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91). The 10-year cumulative risk of failure was 15% vs 20% after staged and primary reconstruction, respectively. In all, 1141 patients (52.5%) received an IPAA and 1031 (47.5%) an IRA. In stratified multivariable models, staged reconstruction was more successful than primary reconstruction in both IRA (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.54-1.04) and IPAA (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01), although risk estimates failed to attain statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In UC patients undergoing colectomy, postponing restorative surgery may decrease the risk of failure.

Management, Functional Outcomes, and Quality of Life After Development of Pelvic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Re-Do Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis

BACKGROUND

The data on management and outcomes of pelvic sepsis after re-do IPAA are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to report our management algorithm of pelvic sepsis in the setting of re-do IPAA and compare functional outcomes and quality of life after successful management of pelvic sepsis with a no sepsis control group.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This investigation is based on a single academic practice group experience on re-do IPAA.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent re-do IPAA for ileal pouch failure between September 2016 and September 2020 were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Management of pelvic sepsis was reported. Functional outcomes, restrictions, and quality-of-life scores were compared between the sepsis and no sepsis groups.

RESULTS

One-hundred ten patients were included in our study, of whom 25 (22.7%) developed pelvic sepsis. Twenty-three patients presented with pelvic sepsis before ileostomy closure, and 2 patients presented with pelvic sepsis after ileostomy closure. There were 6 pouch failures in the study period due to pelvic sepsis. Our management was successful in 79% of the patients with median follow-up of 26 months. Treatments included interventional radiology abscess drainage (n = 7), IV antibiotics alone (n = 5), interventional radiology drainage and mushroom catheter placement (n = 1), mushroom catheter placement (n = 1), and endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (n = 1). Average number of bowel movements, urgency, incontinence, pad use, and seepage were comparable between the pelvic sepsis and no pelvic sepsis groups ( p > 0.05). Lifestyle alterations, Cleveland Global Quality of Life scores, and happiness with the results of the surgery were similar ( p > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its low study power and limited follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic sepsis is common after re-do IPAA, and management varies according to the location and size of the abscess/sinus. If detected early, our management strategy was associated with high pouch salvage rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B823 .

MANEJO, RESULTADOS FUNCIONALES Y CALIDAD DE VIDA DESPUS DEL DESARROLLO DE SEPSIS PLVICA EN PACIENTES SOMETIDAS A RECONFECCIN DE ANASTOMOSIS ANAL CON BOLSA ILEAL

ANTECEDENTES:Los datos sobre el tratamiento y los resultados de la sepsis pélvica después de reconfección de anastomosis anal, de la bolsa ileal son escasos.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio es informar nuestro algoritmo de manejo de la sepsis pélvica en el contexto de reconfección de anastomosis anal de la bolsa ileal y comparar los resultados funcionales y la calidad de vida después del manejo exitoso de la sepsis pélvica con un grupo de control sin sepsis.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Esta investigación se basa en una experiencia de un solo grupo de práctica académica sobre reconfección de IPAA.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes que se sometieron a una nueva anastomosis anal, del reservorio ileal por falla del reservorio ileal entre el 09/2016 y el 09/2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se informó el manejo de la sepsis pélvica. Los resultados funcionales, las restricciones y las puntuaciones de calidad de vida, se compararon entre los grupos con sepsis y sin sepsis.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 110 pacientes en nuestro estudio, de los cuales 25 (22,7) desarrollaron sepsis pélvica. Veintitrés pacientes presentaron sepsis pélvica antes del cierre de la ileostomía y 2 pacientes presentaron sepsis pélvica después del cierre de la ileostomía. Hubo 6 fallas de la bolsa en el período de estudio debido a sepsis pélvica. Nuestro manejo fue exitoso en el 79% de los pacientes con una mediana de seguimiento de 26 meses. Los tratamientos incluyeron drenaje de abscesos IR (n = 7), antibióticos intravenosos solos (n = 5), drenaje IR y colocación de catéter en forma de hongo (n = 1), colocación de catéter en forma de hongo (n = 1) y cierre endoluminal asistido por vacío (n = 1). El número promedio de evacuaciones intestinales, urgencia, incontinencia, uso de almohadillas y filtraciones fueron comparables entre los grupos con sepsis pélvica y sin sepsis pélvica ( p > 0,05). Las alteraciones del estilo de vida, las puntuaciones de la Calidad de vida global de Cleveland y la felicidad con los resultados de la cirugía fueron similares ( p > 0,05).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su bajo poder de estudio y su tiempo de seguimiento limitado.CONCLUSIONES:La sepsis pélvica es común después de la reconfección de anastomosis anal de la bolsa ileal y el manejo varía según la ubicación y el tamaño del absceso / seno. Si se detecta temprano, nuestra estrategia de manejo se asoció con altas tasas de recuperación de la bolsa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B823 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Conversion of ileo-pouch anal anastomosis to continent ileostomy: strategic surgical considerations and outcome

AIM

The aim was to evaluate surgical strategies for conversion of failed ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) to continent ileostomy (CI), taking morbidity and overall outcome into account. The hypothesis was that complex conversions are equivalent to the primary construction of a CI at the time of proctocolectomy.

METHOD

This was a retrospective analysis of IPAA conversions acknowledging the underlying disease (inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and non-IBD) and extent of pouch reconstruction (PR): type 1 (without PR), type 2 (partial PR), and type 3 (complete PR).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (IBD, n = 16; non-IBD, n = 10) were converted (type 1, n = 13; type 2, n = 7; and type 3, n = 6).12/26 patients (46.2%) presented postoperative complications directly related to the conversion with scarification of two pouches. In a mean follow-up time of 7.5 ± 6.6 years, 5/24 patients required revisional surgery. Of these, three required pouch excision. The cumulative probability of reoperation at the end of the second year increased to 21.7% and remained constant thereafter until the maximum follow-up time of 26 years. The total pouch loss rate was 19.2% (5/26), of which all occurred in the first 3 years. No statistically significant differences were found between the conversion types, complications or pouch survival. For all parameters, IBD patients performed slightly unfavourably. Due to the overall small number of respective patients, a differentiated investigation of IBD was not performed.

CONCLUSION

Complex conversion procedures (types 1 and 2) deliver comparable long-term results to new constructions (type 3), thereby limiting the loss of small bowel. IBD compromises outcome versus non-IBD.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; 18 years of experience and outcomes across two generations of surgeons at a tertiary center in Sweden

AIM

Reconstructive surgery with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard procedure after colectomy in patients with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). It is of interest to understand how a generation shift of the surgeons performing IPAA has affected patients' outcomes.

METHOD

All consecutive patients who underwent IPAA in the period 1999-2016 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden, were included. Surgeons representing two different generations performed the surgeries during this period. The following 6-year time periods were assigned for surgeries performed by: experienced surgeons (1999-2004; Period 1); the new generation of surgeons undergoing training (2005-2010; Period 2); and the new generation of experienced surgeons (2011-2016; Period 3). The primary endpoint was post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3b), and the secondary endpoints were the functional outcome, failure of the pouch, and mortality. Logistic analyses of the results were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 281 patients were included in the study. The rate of post-operative severe complications was lower in Period 1 [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.137; p = .01]. There was no difference in functional outcome between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study implicates that the risk of post-operative complications after IPAA is lower when the surgery is performed by a generation of more-experienced surgeons. This might support literature that concludes that surgical units that have a high throughput of patients and are staffed by surgeons who perform many procedures provide better outcomes.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly used to restore gastrointestinal continuity after surgical treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The aim of the present systematic review was to compare the outcomes of patients with MUC and patients with FAP who underwent IPAA.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2021. Cohort and randomized studies were eligible for inclusion if they directly compared patients with MUC and FAP who underwent IPAA. The main outcome measures were pouch failure, complications, and need for pouch excision or revision. ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias across the studies. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies (9200 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Seven thousand nine hundred fifty (86.4%) had MUC and 1250 (13.6%) had FAP. The median age of patients was 33.1 years. The male to female ratio was 1.4:1. MUC had higher odds of pouchitis (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.8-5.4, p < 0.001), stricture (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.25-2.65, p = 0.002), fistula (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.18-2.54, p = 0.004), and total complications (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.3-2.77, p < 0.001) as compared to FAP. Both groups had similar odds of pelvic sepsis, leakage, pouch failure, excision, revision, and fecal incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with MUC undergoing IPAA may be at a higher risk of developing complications, particularly pouchitis, stricture, and fistula; the ultimate and functional outcome of the pouch is similar to patients with FAP. Pouch failure, excision and revision were similar in the two groups.

Prevalence of 'pouch failure' of the ileoanal pouch in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The ileoanal pouch (IPAA) provides patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) that have not responded to medical therapy an option to retain bowel continuity and defecate without the need for a long-term stoma. Despite good functional outcomes, some pouches fail, requiring permanent diversion, pouchectomy, or a redo pouch. The incidence of pouch failure ranges between 2 and 15% in the literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to define the prevalence of pouch failure in patients with UC who have undergone IPAA using population-based studies.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Embase classic and PubMed from 1978 to 31st of May 2021 to identify cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of pouch failure in adults (≥ 18 years of age) who underwent IPAA for UC.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies comprising 23,389 patients were analysed. With < 5 years of follow-up, the prevalence of pouch failure was 5% (95%CI 3-10%). With ≥ 5 but < 10 years of follow-up, the prevalence was 5% (95%CI 4-7%). This increased to 9% (95%CI 7-16%) with ≥ 10 years of follow-up. The overall prevalence of pouch failure was 6% (95%CI 5-8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of pouch failure in patients over the age of 18 who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy in UC is 6%. These data are important for counselling patients considering this operation. Importantly, for those patients with UC being considered for a pouch, their disease course has often resulted in both physical and psychological morbidity and hence providing accurate expectations for these patients is vital.

Advantages of total proctocolectomy with straight ileoanal anastomosis plus pedicled omental transposition for familial adenomatous polyposis: a preliminary study

Purpose

To achieve excellent postoperative bowel function in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients, it is important to reconstruct the digestive tract. The aim of this study is to preliminarily discuss the advantages of total proctocolectomy with straight ileoanal anastomosis (TPC-SIAA) plus pedicled omental transposition for FAP.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out in two hospitals analysing data for FAP patients who underwent surgical treatments between 2015 and 2021. Perioperative outcomes and early and mid-term anal functions were analysed.

Results

After excluding 4 patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with permanent ileostomy, 10 patients were enrolled in the study. Among the 10 patients, 3 received TPC-SIAA plus pedicled omental transposition, 3 received total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (TPC-IPAA), and 4 received total colectomy with ileal pouch-rectal anastomosis (TC-IPRA). Except for one case conversion to laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery was performed for the other cases. The incidence of early postoperative complications was apparently higher with pouch anastomosis (57.1%) than straight anastomosis (0%). Frequencies of bowel movement and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score were higher for TPC-SIAA than the other two surgical procedures in the early term; over time, however, the frequencies of bowel movement and LARS score both showed a decreasing trend. In addition, combined with anorectal pressure detection and magnetic resonance imaging defecography at the 3rd month after TPC-SIAA plus pedicled omental transposition, defecation coordination was good. The dynamics and receptivity of the new rectum tended to be as expected.

Conclusion

Although the three surgical procedures are safe and feasible surgical options for FAP, TPC-SIAA plus pedicled omental transposition is more consistent with intestinal physiology, with good intestinal compliance, and anal function tended to be as expected over time. Nevertheless, more extensive studies are needed to confirm these benefits.

Staging Pouch Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis in the Biological Era

Restorative proctocolectomy, or ileal pouch anal anastomosis, is considered the standard treatment for intractable ulcerative colitis. When the pelvic pouch was first introduced in 1978, a two-stage procedure with proctocolectomy, construction of the pelvic pouch, and a diverting loop with subsequent closure were suggested. Over the decades that the pelvic pouch has been around, some principal technical issues have been addressed to improve the method. In more recent days the laparoscopic approach has been additionally introduced. During the same time-period the medical arsenal has developed far more with the increasing use of immune modulators and the introduction of biologicals. Staging of restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic pouch refers to how many sessions, or stages, the procedure should be divided into. The main goal with restorative proctocolectomy is a safe operation with optimal short- and long-term function. In this paper we aim to review the present knowledge and views on staging of the pouch procedure in ulcerative colitis, especially with consideration to the treatment with biologicals.

Chronic pouchitis and Crohn's disease of the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal-anastomosis (IPAA) is the operation of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or with inflammatory bowel diseases unclassified (IBDU).

AIMS

to assess the incidence and risk factors of chronic pouchitis (CP) and Crohn's disease of the pouch (CDP) in patients with UC or IBDU.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study. We included consecutive patients who underwent IPAA between 2011 and 2019. The main outcome was the occurrence of CP or CDP. We looked for risk factors with multivariable and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox models.

RESULTS

247 patients were included. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CP or CDP was 35.3% (95%CI: 26.2-43.2). In multivariable analysis, diagnosis of IBDU, age less than 35 years at surgery and extra-intestinal manifestations other than articular and primary sclerosing cholangitis were associated with higher incidence. The LASSO analysis identified these three prognostic factors and articular manifestations. In patients with two or more prognostic factors, 5-year cumulative incidence, was 65.2% (95%CI: 41.8-79.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Five years after IPAA, approximately one-third of patients had either CP or CDP. Risk factors were IBDU, an age less than 35 years at surgery, articular manifestations and other extra-intestinal manifestations.

Handsewn Versus Stapled IPAA in Redo Setting: Indications, Patient Characteristics, Operative, Functional, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The impact of the type of anastomosis on the outcomes of redo IPAA is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the indications, perioperative outcomes, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing stapled vs handsewn redo IPAA.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This investigation is based on a single academic practice group experience with redo IPAA.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent redo IPAA for ileal pouch failure between September 2016 and May 2020 were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Indications, perioperative outcomes, functional outcomes, restrictions, and quality-of-life scores were compared between stapled and handsewn groups.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients underwent redo IPAA for ileal pouch failure of whom 76 (72%) had handsewn and 29 (28%) had stapled reanastomosis. The interval between the index and redo IPAA was shorter in stapled redo IPAA (median (interquartile range), Stapled: 3 years (1-4) vs handsewn: 7 years (3-17), p < 0.001). Handsewn anastomosis was more commonly used after pelvic sepsis (handsewn: n = 57 (76%) vs stapled: n = 13 (45%), p = 0.002). Overall postoperative morbidity was similar between the 2 groups (handsewn: n = 38 (50%) vs stapled: n = 16 (55%), p = 0.635). The number of bowel movements, pad use, daily restrictions, and Cleveland Global Quality of Life scores were similar between stapled and handsewn groups. Although daytime seepage was more common after handsewn anastomosis (handsewn, n = 20 (44%) vs stapled, n = 3 (14%), p = 0.013), nighttime seepage was similar in both groups. Pouch survival rates were comparable: 88% vs 92% (p > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its low study power and limited follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had pelvic sepsis after their index IPAA required handsewn anastomosis at higher rates than other redo cases. Although handsewn anastomosis is a more complex procedure, it is associated with morbidity, functional outcomes, and quality-of-life scores similar to stapled anastomosis for redo IPAA. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B580.

RECONSTRUCCIN DE ANASTOMOSIS ILEONAL CON RESERVORIO ILEAL CON SUTURA MANUAL VERSUS ANASTOMOSIS CON ENGRAPADO INDICACIONES, CARACTERSTICAS DEL PACIENTE, RESULTADOS OPERATORIOS, FUNCIONALES Y DE CALIDAD DE VIDA

ANTECEDENTES:Se desconoce el impacto en los resultados del tipo de anastomosis se rehace una anastomosis ileonal con reservorio ileal (IPAA).OBJETIVO:El propósito de este estudio es evaluar las indicaciones, resultados perioperatorios y funcionales en pacientes sometidos a una reconstrucción IPAA con engrapado vs sutura manual.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Esta investigación se basa en la experiencia de un solo grupo de práctica académica sobre reconstrucción IPAA.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes que fueron sometidos a una reconstrucción de IPAA por falla del reservorio ileal entre septiembre del 2016 hasta mayo del 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:se compararon indicaciones, resultados perioperatorios, funcionales, restricciones y puntuaciones de calidad de vida entre los grupos de engrapado y sutura manual.RESULTADOS:Un total de 105 pacientes fueron sometidos a una reconstrucción de IPAA por falla del reservorio ileal, de los cuales 76 (72%) fueron reanastomosis con sutura manual y 29 (28%) con engrapado. El intervalo entre la cirugía inicial y la reintervención de IPAA fue más corto en la reconstrucción de IPAA con engrapado [mediana (IQR), engrapado: 3 años (1-4) vs con sutura manual: 7 años (3-17), p <0,001]. La anastomosis con sutura manual se realizo con mayor frecuencia después de sepsis pélvica [sutura manual: n = 57 (76%) vs engrapado: n = 13 (45%), p = 0,002]. La morbilidad postoperatoria total fue similar entre los dos grupos [sutura manual: n = 38 (50%) vs engrapado: n = 16 (55%), p = 0,635]. El número de evacuaciones intestinales, el uso de paños protectores, restricciones diarias y puntuaciones en CGQL fueron similares entre los grupos de engrapado y sutura manual. Si bien el manchado por la mañana fue más común después de la anastomosis con sutura manual [sutura manual, n = 20 (44%) vs engrapado, n = 3 (14%), p = 0.013], el manchado por la noche fue similar en ambos grupos. Las tasas de sobrevida con reservorio fueron comparables; 88% vs 92% respectivamente (p> 0,05).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su bajo poder de estudio y su tiempo de seguimiento limitado.CONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes que tuvieron sepsis pélvica después de su primer IPAA, requirieron anastomosis con sutura manual en un porcentaje más alto que otros procedimientos de reintervención. Si bien es cierto, la anastomosis con sutura manual es un procedimiento mucho más complejo; este se asoció a una morbilidad, resultados funcionales y puntuaciones de calidad de vida similares en comparación a la anastomosis con engrapado cuando se rehace la IPAA. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B580. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Despite good overall outcomes in most patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), there is still hesitation about performing an IPAA in older patients due to the comorbidity burden and concern about incontinence. The aim of this work was to identify short- and long-term outcomes in older patinets undergoing IPAA to determine the perioperative safety and long-term functional success of IPAA in older patients.

METHOD

A literature search was performed for all publications on IPAA in adults aged ≥50 years that reported short- and long-term outcomes. Data extraction included demographics, 30-day outcomes, long-term functional outcomes and pouch failure. Data were further separated by age group (50-65 and ≥65 years). Outcomes were compared between age groups. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Of 1053 publications reviewed, 13 full papers were included in the analysis. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 47.3% and 1.3%, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative rates of small bowel obstruction and pelvic sepsis were 7.6% and 9.9%, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 62 months, rates of pouchitis, incontinence and pouch failure were 13.9%, 17.5% and 7.5%, respectively. There was no statically significant difference in rates of short- or long-term functional outcomes based on age 50-65 versus ≥65 years.

CONCLUSION

Increasing age did not increase the rate of short- or long-term outcomes, including pouch failure. These data suggest that the decision for IPAA construction should not be based on age alone.

Indications, functional and quality of life outcomes of new pouch creation during re-do ileal pouch anal anastomosis: A comparative study with existing pouch salvage

BACKGROUND

Salvage of the existing ileal pouch is favored during re-do ileal pouch anal anastomosis if the pouch is not damaged after pelvic dissection and there are no other mechanical reasons that may necessitate construction of a new pouch. Excision of the existing pouch may be associated with some concerns for short-bowel syndrome and poor functional outcomes. This study aimed to report indications and compare functional and quality of life outcomes of new pouch creation versus salvage of the existing pouch during re-do ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent re-do ileal pouch anal anastomosis between September 2016 and June 2020 were included. The reasons for pouch excision and new pouch creation were reported. Perioperative, functional outcomes and quality of life were compared between patients who had creation of a new pouch versus salvage of existing pouch.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with re-do ileal pouch anal anastomosis (new pouch, n = 63) were included. Most common indications for a new pouch creation were chronic pelvic infection that compromised the integrity and viability of the existing pouch (n = 32) and small pouch (n = 21). No patient developed short-bowel syndrome. The number of bowel movements, daily restrictions and Cleveland Global Quality of Life score scores were similar between 2 groups. Day-time seepage, day-time and night-time pad usage were more common after new pouch creation. Two-year pouch survival rates were comparable (new pouch: 92% versus existing pouch: 85%, P = .31).

CONCLUSION

New pouch creation can be safely performed at the time of re-do ileal pouch anal anastomosis. It provides acceptable functional and quality of life outcomes if existing pouch salvage is not feasible.

Ileoanal Pouch: Pelvic Sepsis and Poor Function-Now What?

Pelvic sepsis is a dreadful complication after ileal pouch creation. It is mostly treated conservatively, and the ileal pouch can be salvaged if sepsis is detected and treated in a timely manner. Even under the best circumstances, pelvic sepsis is often associated with poor functional outcomes. If pelvic sepsis becomes chronic, it could lead to pouch failure. Redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a viable option in the setting of chronic pelvic sepsis to preserve gastrointestinal continuity in motivated patients. It is associated with similar surgical morbidity, acceptable functional outcomes, and good quality of life. Patients should be involved in the decision-making process after ileal pouch failure. In the setting of ileal pouch failure, surgeons with limited experience may not be comfortable offering patients redo IPAA. Redo IPAA requires subspecialization and patients with ileal pouch failure should be treated at specialized high-volume centers.

Transanal Ileal Pouch: Is It Better?

Background: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and select patients with Crohn's disease. Minimally invasive techniques have been increasingly adopted including the transanal approach. However there remains a dearth of comparative data assessing the technical advantages and outcomes of a transanal approach to the IPAA against other minimally invasive techniques. Methods: In this review, we describe our learned approach with the transanal IPAA (ta-IPAA) and highlight key technical steps for a successful surgery in addition to evaluating the current literature on surgical and functional outcomes of this relatively novel procedure. Results: The ta-IPAA affords better visualization and access during a pelvic dissection translating to lower conversion rates. Lower odds of postoperative morbidity have been reported, but there was no difference in severity of complications when present. Though this technique has the advantages of a more accurate rectal transection obviating the need for multiple staple firings, the risk of anastomotic leak was similar between the two groups. Functional outcomes were found to be overall similar, though data is limited. Conclusions: The technical aspects of the IPAA have continued to evolve to mitigate the challenges posed by a deep pelvic dissection. While the ta-IPAA has been shown to be a safe and feasible procedure, the true advantages and functional benefits of this technique have yet to be elucidated with large-scale, quality data.

Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-related complications and pouch failure.

Background

Previous studies demonstrated wide variation in postoperative complication rates following IPAA.

Methods

A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on pouch failure published from January 1, 2010, to May 6, 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the relationship between pouch-related complications and pouch failure was assessed using Spearman's correlations.

Results

Thirty studies comprising 22,978 patients were included. Included studies contained heterogenic patient populations, different procedural stages, varying definitions for IPAA-related complications, and different follow-up periods. The pooled pouch failure rate was 7.7% (95% confidence intervals: 5.56-10.59) and 10.3% (95% confidence intervals: 7.24-14.30) for studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. Observed IPAA-related complications were anastomotic leakage (1-17%), pelvic sepsis (2-18%), fistula (1-30%), stricture (1-34%), pouchitis (11-61%), and Crohn's disease of the pouch (0-18%). Pelvic sepsis (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) and fistula (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) were correlated with pouch failure. A sensitivity analysis including studies with a median follow-up of ≥5 years indicated that only fistula was significantly correlated with pouch failure (r = 0.77, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

The single long-term determinant of pouch failure was pouch fistula, which is a manifestation of a chronic leak. Therefore, all effort should be taken to prevent an acute leak from becoming a chronic leak by early diagnosis and proactive management of the leak.

Mini abstract

This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of pouch failure and the correlation between IPAA-related complications and pouch failure. Long-term pouch failure was correlated with fistula, suggesting that early septic complications may result in fistula formation during long-term follow-up, leading to an increased risk of pouch failure.

The pouch behaving badly: management of morbidity after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

AIM

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), or a 'pouch', allows restoration of intestinal continuity after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Most patients have a good long-term outcome after IPAA, but in a significant proportion the functional outcome and quality of life are unsatisfactory. We term this outcome 'the pouch behaving badly'. Managing this, especially one is when unfamiliar with the possible underlying pathologies, is a challenge for both patient and clinician. We aim to outline the clinical approach to the pouch behaving badly, highlighting key aspects of investigation and management.

METHOD

This is a narrative review of the literature covering the investigation and management of postoperative complications and morbidity after IPAA.

RESULTS

Management of the pouch behaving badly requires a careful clinical assessment. The patient may present with multiple symptoms and a clear picture of the symptomatology and past history should be constructed before thorough examination and specialist investigation. We divide the pathology that underlies this clinical scenario into surgical, inflammatory, mechanical, functional and dysplastic causes and outline the investigation and management of each one.

CONCLUSION

The pouch behaving badly is a challenging problem for both patient and clinician. A detailed clinical assessment with careful specialist investigation is key to diagnosing the underlying pathology. We stress the importance of patient-centred care - the aim is to improve quality of life.

Ileal Pouch Excision can Be Performed With Similar Outcomes in Obese Patients Compared to Nonobese Counterparts: An Assessment From American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

BACKGROUND

Failed pouches may tend to be managed with only a loop ileostomy in obese patients due to some safety concerns. The effect of obesity on ileal pouch excision outcomes is poorly studied. In our study, we aimed to assess the short-term outcomes after ileal pouch excision in obese patients compared to their nonobese counterparts.

METHODS

The patients who underwent pouch excision between 2005 and 2017 were included using ACS-NSQIP participant user files. The operative outcomes were compared between obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) and nonobese (BMI<30 kg/m²) groups.

RESULTS

There were 507 pouch excision patients included of which eighty (15.7%) of them were obese. Physical status of the obese patients tended to be worse (ASA>3, 56.3 vs 42.9%, P = .027). There were more patients who had diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HT) in the obese group (26.3% vs. 11.2%, P = .015; 11.3 vs. 4.4%, P < .001, respectively). Operative time was similar between 2 groups (mean ± SD, 275 ± 111 vs. 252±111 minutes, P = .084). Deep incisional SSI was more commonly observed in the obese group (7.5 vs 2.8%, P = .038). In multivariate analysis, only deep incisional SSI was found to be independently associated with obesity (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.02-7.67). Obese patients were readmitted more frequently than nonobese counterparts (28.3 vs 16%, P = .035). The length of hospital stay was comparable [median (IQR), 7 (4-13.5) vs. 7 (5-11) days, P = .942].

CONCLUSION

Ileal pouch excision can be performed in obese patients with largely similar outcomes compared to their nonobese counterparts although obesity is associated with a higher rate of deep space infection.

Bioinformatics Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes and Protein-Protein Interaction Networks Associated with Functional Pathways in Ulcerative Colitis

Background

This bioinformatics study aimed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks associated with functional pathways in ulcerative colitis based on 3 Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets.

Material/Methods

The GSE87466, GSE75214, and GSE48958 MINiML formatted family files were downloaded from the GEO database. DEGs were identified from the 3 datasets, and volcano maps and heat maps were drawn after R language standardization and analysis, respectively. Venn diagram software was used to identify common DEGs. PPI analysis of common DEGs was performed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes. Gene modules and hub genes were visualized in the PPI network using Cytoscape. Enrichment analysis was performed for all common DEGs, module genes, and hub genes.

Results

A total of 90 DEGs were selected, which included 3 functional modules and 1 hub gene module. CXCL8 module genes were mainly enriched in cytokine-mediated signaling pathways and interleukin (IL)-10 signaling. CCL20 module genes were mainly enriched in the IL-17 signaling pathway and cellular response to IL-1. Hub gene modules mainly involved IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13 signaling pathways. CXCL8, CXCL1, and IL-1β were the top 3 hub genes and were mainly involved in IL-10 signaling.

Conclusions

Bioinformatics analysis using 3 GEO datasets identified CXCL8, CXCL1, and IL-1β, which are involved in IL-10 signaling, as the top 3 hub genes in ulcerative colitis. The findings from this study remain to be validated, but they may contribute to the further understanding of the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis.

Protective loop-ileostomy in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis - advantages and disadvantages. A retrospective study

AIM

The aim was to investigate the overall postoperative complication rate within 90 days following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), with or without a diverting stoma, together with complications 30 days after stoma closure and overall pouch failure rate.

METHOD

This was a retrospective chart review including IPAA patients with or without a diverting loop-ileostomy for ulcerative colitis (1 January 1983 to 31 December 2015). Demographic data and postoperative complications were retrieved and recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 434 patients were included. A diverting loop-ileostomy was performed in 348 patients (80%). Baseline data were similar in the two groups except for body mass index (BMI) and the ratio of women, which were significantly higher in the group without a protective ileostomy. Overall 90-day complication rate after IPAA [Clavien-Dindo (CD) > 2] was similar in the two groups. Clinical anastomotic leaks (CD > 2) were higher in patients without a diverting stoma (9.3% vs 1.7%) (P = 0.002). The odds ratio for leakage after adjustments (age, gender, immune-modulating medicine and BMI) was 5.0 for omitting a diverting stoma (P = 0.004). Complications (CD > 2) after loop-ileostomy closure were seen in 61 cases (14.1%). Omitting a diverting stoma at IPAA demonstrated a non-significant odds ratio of 1.04 (0.46, 2.38) (P = 0.924) for pouch failure after adjustments (age, gender, immune-modulating medicine, BMI, time from pouch formation and clinical leakage).

CONCLUSION

The overall postoperative surgical and medical complication rate within 90 days after IPAA was similar in the group with and without diverting stoma. Postoperative complication rate after reversal was 14%. Omitting a diverting stoma at IPAA demonstrated an increased risk of leaks but no significant risk of long-term pouch failure.

Increasing experience of modified two-stage transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for therapy refractory ulcerative colitis. What have we learned? A retrospective analysis on 75 consecutive cases at a tertiary referral hospital

AIM

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) should be delayed to a second stage in patients with ulcerative colitis and prolonged exposure to medical therapy. However, there is still discussion about whether a modified two-stage approach is preferable to a three-stage approach. Recently, a transanal approach has been introduced to overcome the well-known difficulties of laparoscopic pelvic surgery. This paper presents short-term outcomes of transanal IPAA (Ta-IPAA) according to a modified two-stage approach.

METHODS

Data from all patients who underwent a modified two-stage Ta-IPAA for ulcerative colitis refractory to medical therapy were retrieved retrospectively from a prospective database. A comprehensive complication index was used for 90-day postoperative complications. Conversion, duration of surgery, hospital stay and reoperation were considered. A logistic regression model was used to assess risk factors for peri-pouch sepsis.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (68.8%) patients were identified from 109 consecutive IPAAs. Median operation time was 159 min. Conversion rate was 4%. Mean comprehensive complication index was 7. All anastomotic leaks (10.6%) were treated with diverting ileostomy. Additionally, active rescue with transanal drainage and early resuturing of the anastomotic gap was performed in six patients. Ileostomy closure occurred after a median period of 5.4 months. At univariable analysis, factors associated with peri-pouch sepsis were male gender and age at IPAA construction.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified two-stage Ta-IPAA is safe and feasible. Standardization and reproducibility of the technique are reflected in few conversions and intra-operative complications. Finally, morbidity and anastomotic leak do not differ from those reported in previous Ta-IPAA series with a variable proportion of multistage procedures.

Short-term and Long-term Outcomes Following Pelvic Pouch Excision: The Mount Sinai Hospital Experience

BACKGROUND

Few studies have reported surgical outcomes following pouch excision and fewer have described the long-term sequelae. Given the debate regarding optimal surgical management following pouch failure, an accurate estimation of the morbidity associated with this procedure addresses a critical knowledge gap.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review our institutional experience with pouch excision with a focus on indications, short-term outcomes, and long-term reintervention rates.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients registered in the prospectively maintained IBD database with a diagnosis of pelvic pouch failure between 1991 and 2018 were selected.

INTERVENTION

The patients had undergone pelvic pouch excision was measured.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Indications for excision, incidence of short-term and long-term complications, and long-term surgical reintervention were the primary outcomes. In addition, multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify predictors of chronic perineal wound complications and the effect of preoperative diversion. The positive predictive value of a clinical suspicion of Crohn's disease of the pouch was also evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred forty cases were identified. Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced short-term complications and 49.3% experienced delayed morbidity. Overall, one-third of patients required long-term reoperation related to perineal wound, stoma, and hernia complications. On multivariable regression, immunosuppression was associated with increased odds of perineal wound complications, and preoperative diversion was not associated with perineal wound healing. Crohn's disease was suspected in 24 patients preoperatively but confirmed on histopathology in only 6 patients.

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective chart review of a single institution's experience, whereby complication rates may be underestimates of the true event rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch excision is associated with high postoperative morbidity and long-term reintervention due to nonhealing perineal wounds, stoma complications, and hernias. Further study is required to clarify risk reduction strategies to limit perineal wound complications and the appropriate selection of patients for diversion alone vs pouch excision in IPAA failure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B348. RESULTADOS A CORTO Y LARGO PLAZO DESPUÉS DE LA EXTIRPACIÓN DE LA BOLSA PéLVICA: LA EXPERIENCIA DEL HOSPITAL MOUNT SINAÍ: Pocos estudios han informado resultados quirúrgicos después de la escisión de bolsa pélvica (reservorio ileoanal) y menos han descrito las secuelas a largo plazo. Dado el debate sobre el manejo quirúrgico óptimo después de la falla de la bolsa, una estimación precisa de la morbilidad asociada con este procedimiento aborda una brecha crítica de conocimiento.El objetivo de este estudio fue revisar nuestra experiencia institucional con la extirpación de la bolsa con un enfoque en las indicaciones, los resultados a corto plazo y las tasas de reintervención a largo plazo.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Hospital Mt Sinaí, Toronto, Ontario, Canadá.Pacientes adultos registrados en la base de datos de EII mantenida prospectivamente con un diagnóstico de falla de la bolsa pélvica entre 1991 y 2018.Escisión de bolsa pélvica.Las indicaciones para la escisión, la incidencia de complicaciones a corto y largo plazo y la reintervención quirúrgica a largo plazo fueron los resultados primarios valorados. Además, se ajustaron modelos de regresión logística multivariable para identificar predictores de complicaciones de la herida perineal crónica y el efecto de la derivación preoperatoria. También se evaluó el valor predictivo positivo de una sospecha clínica de enfermedad de Crohn de la bolsa.Se identificaron 140 casos. El 59% de los pacientes desarrollaron complicaciones a corto plazo y el 49,3% con morbilidad tardía. En general, 1/3 de los pacientes requirieron una reoperación a largo plazo relacionada con complicaciones de herida perineal, estoma y hernia. En la regresión multivariable, la inmunosupresión se asoció con mayores probabilidades de complicaciones de la herida perineal y la derivación preoperatoria no se asoció con la cicatrización de la herida perineal. La enfermedad de Crohn se sospechó en 24 pacientes antes de la operación, pero se confirmó por histopatología en solo 6 pacientes.Revisión retrospectiva del cuadro de la experiencia de una sola institución por la cual las tasas de complicaciones pueden ser subestimadas de las tasas de eventos reales.La escisión de la bolsa se asocia con una alta morbilidad postoperatoria y una reintervención a largo plazo debido a complicaciones de heridas perineales, complicaciones del estoma y hernias. Se requieren más estudios para aclarar las estrategias de reducción de riesgos para limitar las complicaciones de la herida perineal y la selección adecuada de pacientes para la derivación sola versus la escisión de la bolsa en caso de falla de reservorio ileoanal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B348.

Distribution of Elective Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Cases for Ulcerative Colitis: a Study Utilizing the University Health System Consortium Database

BACKGROUND

Trends and distribution of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedures for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are unknown. We examined the frequency, distribution, and volume-outcome relationship for this relatively infrequent procedure using a large national data source.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) for patients with a primary diagnosis of UC admitted electively and who underwent surgical intervention between 2012 and 2015.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population (n = 6875) was 43 years and 57% were men. Among these, one-third (n = 2307) underwent an IPAA, while 24% (n = 1160) underwent total abdominal colectomy, 16% (n = 1134) underwent proctectomy, and 2% (n = 108) underwent total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy. The frequency of IPAA cases among all elective surgical cases was relatively stable at 33-35% over the study period. A total of 131 hospitals, out of 279 hospitals participating in the UHC (47%), performed IPAA. UHC contains all inpatient data on more than 140 (> 90%) academic medical centers in the US and their affiliates. Most hospitals (101) performed < 5 cases annually. The median number of IPAA cases performed annually was 1.8 [IQR 0.8 - 4.3]. The top 10 hospitals performed one-half (48%) of IPAA cases, but only 18% of another type of complex pelvic dissection cases such as low anterior resection. Short-term postoperative complications after IPAA, however, were similar regardless of IPAA volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-half of IPAA cases were performed at only 10 hospitals out of the 131 hospitals performing IPAA in the study. IPAA procedures are infrequently performed by most academic medical centers in the US. The redistribution of IPAA procedures, likely a result of previously established referral patterns and centralization, has a potential impact on the training of future colorectal fellows as well as access to care.

Anti-TNF and Pouch Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: The Ones who Blame for More Complications?

Since the approval in 2005 of anti-TNF drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, concerns have been raised about the potential detrimental effect of these agents on postoperative infectious complications related to pouch surgery. Data on this topic are controversial and mostly derived from retrospective underpowered cohort studies largely affected by relevant bias. Three meta-analyses have been published with contradictory results. Moreover, the correlation between serum levels of infliximab at the time of surgery and the occurrence of septic postoperative complication is far to be proven and remains an answered research question. The construction of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) as first surgical step in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to medical treatment seems to be associated with an increased risk of septic complications. Population-based data from the United States show a shift towards stage surgery for patients with refractory UC as a consequence of the widespread use of biological agents and the increased tendency to consider surgery as ultimate resort (step-up approach). In this setting, the classic 3-stage procedure (ileoanal pouch and diversion ileostomy after initial total colectomy) together with the modified 2-stage approach (ileoanal pouch without diversion ileostomy after initial total colectomy) are both effective options. Whether or not a diversion ileostomy could prevent pouch complications at the time of the pouch construction during the second stage of surgery is still a matter of debate. Emerging data seem to claim for increased risk of small bowel obstructions related to the presence of a stoma without proven effect on the prevention of anastomotic leak.

Transabdominal Pouch Salvage for Failed Minimally Invasive Versus Open IPAA: A Case-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

Modality of index IPAA creation may affect the results after redo IPAA surgery for IPAA failure. To our knowledge, there is no study evaluating the effects of modality of index IPAA creation on redo IPAA outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of transabdominal redo IPAA surgery for failed minimally invasive IPAA and open IPAA.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This investigation was based on a single-surgeon experience on redo IPAA.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing transabdominal redo IPAA for a failed minimally invasive IPAA and open IPAA between September 2007 and September 2017 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Short-term complications and long-term outcomes were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients with failed index minimally invasive IPAA were case matched with 42 failed index open IPAA counterparts. The interval between index IPAA and redo IPAA operations was shorter in patients who had minimally invasive IPAA (median, 28.5 vs 56.0 mo; p = 0.03). A long rectal stump (>2 cm) was more common after minimally invasive IPAA (26% vs 10%; p = 0.046). Redo IPAAs were constructed more commonly with staplers in the laparoscopy group compared with open counterparts (26% vs 10%; p = 0.046), and other intraoperative details were comparable. Although short-term morbidity was similar between 2 groups, abscess formation (7% vs 24%; p = 0.035) was more frequent in patients who had index IPAA with open technique. Functional outcomes were comparable. Redo IPAA survival for failed minimally invasive IPAA and open IPAA was comparable.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective, nonrandomized nature and relatively low patient number.

CONCLUSIONS

A long rectal cuff after minimally invasive IPAA is a potential and preventable risk factor for failure. Due to its technical and patient-related complexity, handsewn anastomoses in redo IPAA are associated with increased risk of abscess formation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B252. RESCATE DEL RESERVORIO ILEO-ANAL POR VIA TRANSABDOMINAL EN CASOS DE FUGA ANASTOMÓTICA ENTRE ABORDAGE MINIMAMENTE INVASIVO Y ABORDAJE ABIERTO: ESTUDIO DE EMPAREJAMIENTO DE MUESTRAS Y CASOS: La creación de modalidades e índices de Reservorios Ileo-Anales (RIA) pueden afectar los resultados después de rehacer la cirugía de RIAs por fallas en el reservorio. Hasta donde sabemos, no hay ningún estudio que evalúe los efectos de la modalidad de creación de índices RIA en los resultados para el rescate del reservorio.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar los resultados a corto y largo plazo de la cirugía transabdominal redo RIA en casos de fracaso por via mínimamente invasiva (MI-RIA) o por la vía abierta (A-RIA).Estudio de cohortes tipo retrospectivo.Investigación basada en la experiencia de un solo cirujano en redo del Reservorio Ileo-Anal.Se incluyeron aquellos pacientes sometidos a re-operación transabdominal y re-confección de un RIA por fallas en el MI-RIA y en el A-RIA durante un lapso de tiempo entre septiembre 2007 y septiembre 2017.Las complicaciones a corto plazo y los resultados a largo plazo se compararon entre los dos grupos.Un total de 42 pacientes con índice fallido de MI-RIA fueron emparejados con 42 homólogos con índice fallido de A-RIA. El intervalo entre las operaciones de RIA y redo RIA fué más corto en pacientes que tenían MI-RIA (mediana, 28,5 meses frente a 56 meses, p = 0,03). Un muñón rectal largo (> 2 cm) fue más común después de MI-RIA (26% vs 10%, p = 0.046). Redo RIAs se construyeron más comúnmente con engrampadoras en el grupo Minimalmente Invasivo en comparación con la contraparte abiertas (26% vs 10%, p = 0.046). Aunque la morbilidad a corto plazo fue similar entre los dos grupos, la aparición de abscesos (7% frente a 24%, p = 0.035) fue más frecuente en pacientes que tenían RIA con técnica abierta. Los resultados funcionales fueron comparables. La sobrevida de las redo RIAs para MI-RIA y A-RIA fallidas, también fué comparable.Este estudio estuvo limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva, no aleatoria y el número relativamente bajo de pacientes.Un muñon rectal largo después de MI-RIA es un factor de riesgo potencial y previsible para el fracaso. Debido a su complejidad técnica y relacionada con el paciente, las anastomosis suturadas a mano en redo RIA están asociadas con un mayor riesgo de formación de abscesos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B252.

Twenty years of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in Beaumont Hospital

INTRODUCTION

An ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice in selected patients to restore intestinal continuity following proctocolectomy. Data on IPAA in the Republic of Ireland is lacking, and surgery for IPAA has evolved over time. The aim of this retrospective study was to report our institutional outcomes from IPAA over a 20-year period.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collated from consecutive primary IPAA cases between 1998 and 2017 at Beaumont Hospital. Patient demographics and operative approach were examined, and pouch failure was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients underwent IPAA over the study period with a mean follow-up of 9.4 ± 5.6 years. The mean age at IPAA was 35.9 ± 10.0 years, and 58.9% were male. The majority were performed in 3 stages (78.9%), were performed to treat ulcerative colitis (66.3%), were of a J-pouch configuration (96.8%), and had a stapled anastomosis (70.5%). On follow-up, 28.4% reported experiencing at least 1 episode of pouchitis and the 10-year pouch failure rate was 14%. In the last decile of the study period, the mean number of IPAA performed per year increased to 10.5 ± 2.1 (P = 0.013), the age of IPAA formation reduced (P = 0.049), and the proportion completed in a minimally invasive manner increased (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable long-term outcomes were observed by our institution. A recent increase in institutional volume, reduction in patient age, and increase in the proportion of cases performed laparoscopically have been identified.

Conditional Survival After IPAA for Ulcerative and Indeterminate Colitis: Does Long-term Pouch Survival Improve or Worsen With Time?

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for pouch survival may or may not have a linear relationship with pouch loss over time. Conditional survival is a method to describe these nonlinear time-to-event relationships by reporting the expected survival at various time points.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to calculate conditional pouch survival based on occurrence of risk factors for pouch loss.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study from an institutional database.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

PATIENTS

Patients with ulcerative or indeterminate colitis who underwent index IPAA construction between 1986 and 2016 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were stratified based on postoperative anastomotic leak, abscess, or fistula occurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method with conditional survival was used to estimate overall and cause-specific survival at 10 years.

RESULTS

A total of 3468 patients underwent IPAA during the study period. The overall 10-year pouch survival rate was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95), and after 1 year the conditional pouch survival increased to 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.96), after 3 years to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98), and after 5 years to 0.98 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99). A total of 122 patients (3.5%) developed anastomotic leak, and the 10-year IPAA survival in patients with leak was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93). In this group, after 1 year of pouch survival, the conditional pouch survival increased to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96) and after 3 years to 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). A similar pattern was seen for IPAA with postoperative abscess. The conditional survival curve was stable over time for patients with a fistula.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective, single-institution study.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall conditional pouch survival improved over time for patients with postoperative anastomotic leak and abscess. These novel findings can be useful to counsel patients regarding expectations for long-term pouch survival even if they develop leaks and abscesses. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B217. SUPERVIVENCIA CONDICIONAL DESPUÉS DE ANASTOMOSIS CON BOLSA ÍLEO ANAL, PARA COLITIS ULCERATIVA E INDETERMINADA: ¿LA SOBREVIDA DE LA BOLSA A LARGO PLAZO, MEJORA O EMPEORA CON EL TIEMPO?: Los factores de riesgo para la sobrevida de la bolsa, pueden o no tener una relación lineal con la pérdida de la bolsa y con el tiempo. La supervivencia condicional es un método para describir estas relaciones no lineales de tiempo, hasta el evento informando la supervivencia esperada en varios puntos de tiempo.El objetivo de este estudio fue calcular la supervivencia condicional de la bolsa, en función de aparición de factores de riesgo para la pérdida de bolsa.Estudio retrospectivo de una base de datos institucional.Cleveland Clinic Foundation.Pacientes con colitis ulcerativa o indeterminada, sometidos a una anastomosis de bolsa íleo anal, de 1986 a 2016.Los pacientes fueron estratificados en función de la fuga anastomótica postoperatoria, absceso o aparición de fístula. El método de Kaplan Meier con supervivencia condicional, se utilizó para estimar la supervivencia general y la causa específica a los 10 años.Un total de 3.468 pacientes fueron sometidos a anastomosis ileal con bolsa anal durante el período de estudio. La tasa de supervivencia global de la bolsa a 10 años, fue de 0,94 (0,93 a 0,95), y después de 1 año, la supervivencia condicional de la bolsa aumentó a 0,95 (0,94 a 0,96), después de 3 años a 0,97 (0,96 a 0,98) y después de 5 años a 0.98 (0.98 - 0.99). Un total de 122 (3,5%) pacientes desarrollaron fuga anastomótica, y la supervivencia de la anastomosis de bolsa íleo anal a 10 años en pacientes con fuga fue de 0,85 (IC del 95%: 0,77 a 0,93). En este grupo, después de 1 año de supervivencia de la bolsa, la supervivencia condicional de la bolsa aumentó a 0,89 (IC del 95%: 0,82 a 0,96), y después de 3 años a 0,98 (IC del 95%: 0,94 a 1). Se observó un patrón similar para la anastomosis de bolsa íleo anal con absceso postoperatorio. La curva de supervivencia condicional fue estable en el tiempo para los pacientes con una fístula.Estudio retrospectivo, de una sola institución.La supervivencia condicional global de la bolsa, mejoró con el tiempo para pacientes con fuga anastomótica postoperatoria y absceso. Estos nuevos hallazgos pueden ser útiles para aconsejar a los pacientes con respecto a las expectativas de supervivencia de la bolsa a largo plazo, incluso si desarrollan fugas y abscesos. Consulte Video Resumen http://links.lww.com/DCR/B217. (Traducción-Dr Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Impact on Fertility After Failure of Restorative Proctocolectomy in Men and Women With Ulcerative Colitis: A 17-Year Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Impact of restorative proctocolectomy failure on fertility has not been studied and is greatly relevant.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of restorative proctocolectomy failure on birth rate in women and men, along with in vitro fertilization incidence and success.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective registry-based cohort study over 17 years.

SETTINGS

Records for parenting a child were cross-linked with patient records. In women, in vitro fertilization records were cross-linked. All data were prospectively registered.

PATIENTS

Patients of fertile age with ulcerative colitis between 1994 and 2010 were identified in Danish national databases. Patients with restorative proctocolectomy and restorative proctocolectomy failure were identified as subgroups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Birth rate ratios and in vitro fertilization incidence and success were measured.

RESULTS

We included 11,939 women and 13,569 men with ulcerative colitis. A total of 711 women and 730 men had restorative proctocolectomy; 114 women and 90 men had failure. Birth rate in women with failure was significantly reduced compared with women without (birth rate ratio = 0.50 (95% CI, 0.29-0.82)). In men with failure, birth rate tended to be lower compared with men without (birth rate ratio = 0.74 (95% CI, 0.51-1.05)). In vitro fertilization incidence was similar with and without failure (HRs adjusted for age at start of follow-up = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.58-1.67]). In vitro fertilization success was significantly lower with failure compared with ulcerative colitis (OR adjusted for age at start of follow-up = 0.36 (95% CI, 0.4-0.92)).

LIMITATIONS

Information on patients leading up to restorative proctocolectomy failure is lacking. Failure patients may have had children during a period with pouch function. Therefore, the impact of failure may be underestimated.

CONCLUSIONS

Restorative proctocolectomy failure impairs birth rate, primarily in women. Although in vitro fertilization incidence is similar in women with and without failure, the likelihood of giving birth after in vitro fertilization is reduced. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B202. IMPACTO SOBRE LA FERTILIDAD DESPUéS DEL FRACASO DE LA PROCTOCOLECTOMíA RESTAURADORA EN HOMBRES Y MUJERES CON COLITIS ULCEROSA: UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE DE 17 AñOS: No se ha estudiado el impacto de la falla de la proctocolectomía restauradora en la fertilidad y es muy relevante.Evaluar el impacto del fracaso de la proctocolectomía restauradora en la tasa de natalidad en mujeres y hombres, junto con la incidencia y el éxito de la fertilización in vitro.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo basado en el registro de más de 17 años.Los registros de crianza de un niño se cruzaron con los registros de pacientes. En las mujeres, los registros de fertilización in vitro se cruzarón. Todos los datos se regitraron de forma prospectiva.Los pacientes de edad fértil con colitis ulcerosa entre 1994-2010 fueron identificados en las bases de datos nacionales danesas. Los pacientes con proctocolectomía restauradora y fracaso de la proctocolectomía restauradora se identificaron como subgrupos.Tasas de natalidad e incidencia y éxito de la fertilización in vitro.Se incluyeron 11939 mujeres y 13569 hombres con colitis ulcerosa. 711 mujeres y 730 hombres tuvieron proctocolectomía restauradora; 114 mujeres y 90 hombres tuvieron fracaso. La tasa de natalidad en las mujeres con fracaso se redujo significativamente en comparación con las mujeres sin fracaso (tasa de natalidad: 0,50; IC del 95% [0,29; 0,82]). En los hombres con fracaso, la tasa de natalidad tendió a ser más baja en comparación con los hombres sin fracaso (tasa de natalidad: 0,74; IC del 95% [0,51; 1,05]). La incidencia de fertilización in vitro fue similar con y sin falla (aHR: 0.98, IC 95% [0.58; 1.67]). El éxito de la fertilización in vitro fue significativamente menor con el fracaso en comparación con la colitis ulcerosa (aOR: 0.36 IC 95% [0.4; 0.92]).Falta información sobre los pacientes que conducen al fracaso de la proctocolectomía restauradora. Los pacientes con fracaso pueden haber tenido hijos durante un período con función de bolsa. Por lo tanto, el impacto del fracaso puede ser subestimado.El fracaso de la proctocolectomía restauradora afecta la tasa de natalidad, principalmente en mujeres. Aunque la incidencia de la fertilización in vitro es similar en las mujeres con y sin fracaso, la probabilidad de dar a luz después de la fertilización in vitro se reduce. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B202. (Traducción-Dr Gonzalo Hagerman).

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: long-term outcomes and trends over time in a low-volume institution

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can restore bowel continuity for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who have needed total colectomy with end ileostomy. Internationally, this surgery is recommended for centralisation focussing reflection on Irish outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective study examining patient outcomes after IPAA in our institution over a 15-year period using data from inflammatory bowel disease database, HIPE codes and clinical charts review between January 2002 and January 2018. Cohorts were analysed overall and in 5-year cohorts as well as by access modality of pouch operation. Contextualising Irish data were identified from published literature review.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (average age 34.8, 21/64% male) had IPAA for UC locally with 64-month mean follow-up. Overall laparoscopic procedure rate was 39.4% (85% 2013-17) being associated with lower lengths of stay (10.6 ± 8 vs 12.7 ± 6.5 days open access). The mean total duration of ileostomy was 27.3 ± 22.5 months, being longest most recently and with an open index procedure. Overall pouchitis affected 53% (n = 18) with rates at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years being 17.6%, 38.2, 50.0% and 52.9%, respectively. Pouch failure rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 2.9%, 11.8% and 17.6%. Outcomes were similar with other centres publishing from Ireland although none met modern criteria for high-volume practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall outcomes and practice in this study are consistent with previously published studies on IPAA nationally and internationally. While acceptable, the opportunity from surgical centre collaboration outside of the National Cancer and Acute Surgery Strategies is to offer still better outcomes for our patients.