1
|
Mészner Z, Wysocki J, Richter D, Zavadska D, Ivaskeviciene I, Usonis V, Pokorn M, Mangarov A, Jancoriene L, Man SC, Kristufkova Z, Jesenak M, Tešović G, Pluta J, Wolfson LJ. Burden of varicella in Central and Eastern Europe: findings from a systematic literature review. Expert Rev Vaccines 2019; 18:281-293. [PMID: 30810402 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1573145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination against varicella rapidly reduces disease incidence, resulting in reductions in both individual burden and societal costs. Despite these benefits, there is no standardization of varicella immunization policies in Europe, including countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). AREAS COVERED This systematic literature review identified publications on the epidemiology of varicella, its associated health and economic burden, and vaccination strategies within the CEE region, defined as Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Twenty-six studies were identified from a search of PubMed, Embase®, and MEDLINE® biomedical literature databases, supplemented by gray literature and country-specific/global websites. EXPERT COMMENTARY Limited information exists in published studies on the burden of varicella in CEE. The wide variability in incidence rates between countries is likely explained by a lack of consistency in reporting systems. Funded universal varicella vaccination (UVV) in CEE is currently available only in Latvia as a one-dose schedule, but Hungary together with Latvia are introducing a two-dose strategy in 2019. For countries that do not provide UVV, introduction of vaccination is predicted to provide substantial reductions in cases and rates of associated complications, with important economic benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsófia Mészner
- a Heim Pal National Paediatric Institute , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Jacek Wysocki
- b Department of Preventive Medicine , Poznan University of Medical Sciences , Poznan , Poland
| | - Darko Richter
- c Department of Paediatrics , University Hospital Centre , Zagreb , Croatia
| | - Dace Zavadska
- d Department of Paediatrics , Riga Stradins University , Riga , Latvia
| | - Inga Ivaskeviciene
- e Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , Vilnius University , Vilnius , Lithuania.,f Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos , Vilnius , Lithuania
| | - Vytautas Usonis
- e Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , Vilnius University , Vilnius , Lithuania
| | - Marko Pokorn
- g Department of Infectious Diseases , University Medical Centre Ljubljana , Ljubljana , Slovenia
| | - Atanas Mangarov
- h Hospital for Infectious Diseases , Medical University of Sofia , Sofia , Bulgaria
| | - Ligita Jancoriene
- f Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos , Vilnius , Lithuania.,i Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Dermatovenerology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , Vilnius University , Vilnius , Lithuania
| | - Sorin C Man
- j Mother and Child Care Department , University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hațieganu' , Cluj-Napoca , Romania
| | - Zuzana Kristufkova
- k Faculty of Public Health , Slovak Medical University , Bratislava , Slovakia
| | - Milos Jesenak
- l Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin , Comenius University , Bratislava , Slovakia
| | - Goran Tešović
- m University Hospital for Infectious Diseases , University of Zagreb, School of Medicine , Zagreb , Croatia
| | - Justyna Pluta
- n Global Medical Affairs , MSD Polska Sp. z. o.o ., Warsaw , Poland
| | - Lara J Wolfson
- o Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE) , Merck & Co., Inc ., Kenilworth , NJ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karafillakis E, Larson HJ. The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations. Vaccine 2017; 35:4840-4850. [PMID: 28760616 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 07/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The success of vaccination strategies depends in part on population perceptions of benefits and risks of vaccines and related confidence in vaccination. Better knowledge of public concerns about vaccines and what is driving them is needed to inform vaccination strategies and communications. This literature reviewer examined studies on vaccine and vaccination risk perceptions and concerns across European populations. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies published between 2004 and 2014 in Europe. A descriptive analysis was performed. FINDINGS A total of 145 articles were selected, most of which were conducted in the UK, the Netherlands and France and studied seasonal influenza, HPV and pandemic influenza vaccination. Across all countries and vaccines, the primary area of concern was vaccine safety, followed by perceptions of low likelihood of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), perceived low severity of VPDs, beliefs that vaccines do not work, and overall lack of information. Concerns were found to be vaccine-, country- and population-specific. CONCLUSION In addition to identifying concerns about vaccination in Europe, this study confirmed the notion that individuals have many safety concerns about vaccination and often believe that the risks of vaccination outweigh their benefits. More research needs to be conducted to explore the impact of different types of communication strategies, which would frame the benefits of vaccination as well as risks of not vaccinating. Strategies to better inform public perceptions of vaccines should include the provision of unbiased, comprehensive information tailored to population information needs, and delivered using multiple and new communication technologies such as social media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Karafillakis
- Vaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi J Larson
- Vaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical medicine, London, United Kingdom; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vezzosi L, Santagati G, Angelillo IF. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of parents towards varicella and its vaccination. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:172. [PMID: 28241788 PMCID: PMC5327543 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2247-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this cross-sectional survey were to examine the knowledge, the attitudes, and the behavior regarding the varicella infection and its vaccination and to get insight into their determinants among parents of children in Italy. METHODS From May to June 2015 in the geographic area of Naples (Italy) a random sample of 675 parents of children aged 4-7 years received a self-administered anonymous questionnaire about socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards varicella and its vaccination. RESULTS A total of 414 parents responded to the questionnaire, for a response rate of 61.3%. A history of varicella was reported in 163 children (39.6%). Only 26.6% parents knew that the vaccine was available and the number of doses and this knowledge was significantly higher in those who had a university degree, in those who had received information on the vaccination from a health care provider, and in those who had vaccinated their child. The perceived utility towards vaccination had a mean value of 5.7. The positive attitude towards the utility of the vaccination was higher in parents with a level of education not higher than middle school, in those who had vaccinated their child, in those who considered the varicella a dangerous disease, and in those who had received information from a health care provider. More than one-third had vaccinated their child. Immunization was more frequent in parents who had knowledge about the vaccination, who beliefs that the immunization was useful, who believed that the disease was not dangerous, and who had not a history of varicella among their children. CONCLUSIONS Educational programs are needed among parents as support to improve knowledge about vaccination and immunization coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Vezzosi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriella Santagati
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Italo F Angelillo
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Luciano Armanni, 5, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Caniza MA, Hunger SP, Schrauder A, Valsecchi MG, Pui CH, Masera G, Members of International Study Group of Childhood ALL ( “Ponte di Legno Working Group”). The controversy of varicella vaccination in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58:12-6. [PMID: 20848637 PMCID: PMC3004985 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Collaborators] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2010] [Accepted: 06/25/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The available guidelines for varicella vaccination of susceptible children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have become increasingly conservative. However, vaccination of those who have remained in continuous complete remission for 1 year and are receiving chemotherapy is still considered a reasonable option. There is little available data to allow a comparison of the risk versus benefit of vaccinating these patients. PROCEDURE We retrospectively reviewed mortality due to varicella in the records of 15 pediatric ALL study groups throughout Europe, Asia, and North America during the period 1984-2008. RESULTS We found that 20 of 35,128 children with ALL (0.057%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.037-0.088%) died of VZV infection. The mortality rate was lower in North America (3 of 11,558 children, 0.026%; 95% CI, 0.009-0.076%) than in the Asian countries (2 of 4,882 children, 0.041%; 95% CI, 0.011-0.149%) and in Europe (15 of 18,688 children, 0.080%; 95% CI, 0.049-0.132%) consistent with the generally higher rate of VZV vaccination in North America. Fourteen of the 20 patients (70%) died during the first year of treatment for ALL. One death was attributed to varicella vaccination. CONCLUSIONS The negligible rate of fatal varicella infection in children with ALL, the risk that accompanies vaccination, and the necessity of withholding chemotherapy for vaccination appear to outweigh the potential benefit of varicella vaccination for children during treatment of ALL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguela A Caniza
- Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
Collaborators
Andre Baruchel, Andrea Biondi, Meenakshi Devidas, Keizo Horibe, Der-Cherng Liang, Akira Ohara, Jun Okamura, Rob Pieters, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Martin Schrappe, Batia Stark, Jan Stary,
Collapse
|
5
|
Coniglio MA, Platania M, Privitera D, Giammanco G, Pignato S. Parents' attitudes and behaviours towards recommended vaccinations in Sicily, Italy. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:305. [PMID: 21569424 PMCID: PMC3107180 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2010] [Accepted: 05/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since a long time, Italy has maintained a dual system to administer childhood immunisations, that is a certain number of mandatory vaccinations and a number of recommended vaccinations. The study aimed to explore the issues surrounding parental acceptance or non-acceptance of the recommended vaccinations for children. Methods Parents of children aged 3-5 years of day-care centres in Sicily were asked to fill out an anonymous questionnaire. Determinants of the attitude towards recommended vaccinations and social influence on the decision-making process were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Results Of the 1,500 selected parents, 81.0% participated in the study. Prior to the survey, the majority of children (97.6%) received recommended vaccines. Most parents (74.4%) received information about vaccinations from Family Paediatricians, showed a good knowledge about the side effects of the vaccines (73.1%), did not worry about their potential dangerousness (53.0%) and would have accepted their children to be vaccinated even if it was not required for day care (84.1%). The majority (79.9%) were not disposed to follow the advises of the anti-vaccination movements. Parents' background characteristics, sources of information and social influence were not significantly associated with parental acceptance of recommended vaccines for childhood. Conclusions This study suggests that health information by Family Paediatricians is significantly associated with parental acceptance of recommended vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Anna Coniglio
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health G, F, Ingrassia, via Santa Sofia 87, 95123, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|