Multimodality imaging to assess immediate response following irreversible electroporation in patients with malignant hepatic tumors

Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonazoid-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Detection of Liver Metastasis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential clinical role and reliability of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound (SEUS) as a diagnostic tool for liver metastatic lesions.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was conducted across five electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, from their inception up to January 2024 to identify all studies evaluating the use of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for detecting hepatic metastases. A meta-analysis was performed to assess diagnostic accuracy using the Meta-DiSc 2.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies were included, 16 of which were eligible for meta-analysis and diagnostic test accuracy evaluation. A total of 13 studies in the meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for 1347 metastatic and 1565 non-metastatic liver lesions. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for CEUS were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), respectively. The combined positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 11.89 (95% CI: 5.42-26.09), 0.12 (95% CI:0.08-0.19), and 91.99 (95% CI: 32.15-263.17), respectively. Additionally, four studies of the meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced intraoperative sonography (CE-IOUS) in detecting 664 metastatic and 246 non-metastatic liver lesions. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for CE-IOUS were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.65-0.93), respectively. The aggregated positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated as 5.95 (95% CI: 2.32-15.25), 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02-0.24), and 77.68 (95% CI: 10.33-583.86), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CE-IOUS and CEUS are reliable approaches for diagnosing liver metastatic lesions. CE-IOUS, in particular, exhibits higher accuracy in identifying liver metastatic lesions, indicating its potential effectiveness in clinical practice.

Comparisons of Radiofrequency Ablation, Microwave Ablation, and Irreversible Electroporation by Using Propensity Score Analysis for Early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite the diversity of thermal ablations, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), and non-thermal ablation, such as irreversible electroporation (IRE) cross-comparisons of multiple ablative modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment remain scarce. Thus, we investigated the therapeutic outcomes of different three ablation modalities in the treatment of early stage HCC.

METHODS

A total of 322 consecutive patients with 366 HCCs (mean tumor size ± standard deviation: 1.7 ± 0.9 cm) who underwent RFA (n = 216, 59.0%), MWA (n = 91, 28.3%), or IRE (n = 15, 4.7%) were included. Local tumor progression (LTP) rates for LTP were compared among the three modalities. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

A significant difference in 2-year LTP rates between the IRE and RFA groups (IRE, 0.0% vs. RFA, 45.0%; p = 0.005) was found. There was no significant difference in 2-year LTP rates between the IRE and MWA groups (IRE, 0.0% vs. MWA, 25.0%; p = 0.103) as well as between the RFA and MWA groups (RFA, 18.2% vs. MWA, 20.6%; p = 0.586).

CONCLUSION

IRE provides better local tumor control than RFA as a first-line therapeutic option for small perivascular HCC.

Diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatments assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma

This article provides an overview of diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatment assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Only studies, in the English language from January 2010 to January 202, evaluating the diagnostic tools and assessment of ablative therapies in HCC patients were included. We found 173 clinical studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria.HCC may be noninvasively diagnosed by imaging findings. Multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging is necessary to assess HCC. Intravenous extracellular contrast agents are used for CT, while the agents used for MRI may be extracellular or hepatobiliary. Both gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine may be used in hepatobiliary phase imaging. For treatment-naive patients undergoing CT, unenhanced imaging is optional; however, it is required in the post treatment setting for CT and all MRI studies. Late arterial phase is strongly preferred over early arterial phase. The choice of modality (CT, US/CEUS or MRI) and MRI contrast agent (extracelllar or hepatobiliary) depends on patient, institutional, and regional factors. MRI allows to link morfological and functional data in the HCC evaluation. Also, Radiomics is an emerging field in the assessment of HCC patients.Postablation imaging is necessary to assess the treatment results, to monitor evolution of the ablated tissue over time, and to evaluate for complications. Post- thermal treatments, imaging should be performed at regularly scheduled intervals to assess treatment response and to evaluate for new lesions and potential complications.

A Systematic Review about Imaging and Histopathological Findings for Detecting and Evaluating Electroporation Based Treatments Response

BACKGROUND

Imaging methods and the most appropriate criteria to be used for detecting and evaluating response to oncological treatments depend on the pathology and anatomical site to be treated and on the treatment to be performed. This document provides a general overview of the main imaging and histopathological findings of electroporation-based treatments (Electrochemotherapy-ECT and Irreversible electroporation-IRE) compared to thermal approach, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), in deep-seated cancers with a particular attention to pancreatic and liver cancer.

METHODS

Numerous electronic datasets were examined: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The research covered the years from January 1990 to April 2021. All titles and abstracts were analyzed. The inclusion criteria were the following: studies that report imaging or histopathological findings after ablative thermal and not thermal loco-regional treatments (ECT, IRE, RFA) in deep-seated cancers including pancreatic and liver cancer and articles published in the English language. Exclusion criteria were unavailability of full text and congress abstracts or posters and different topic respect to inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

558 potentially relevant references through electronic searches were identified. A total of 38 articles met the inclusion criteria: 20 studies report imaging findings after RFA or ECT or IRE in pancreatic and liver cancer; 17 studies report histopathological findings after RFA or ECT or IRE; 1 study reports both imaging and histopathological findings after RFA or ECT or IRE.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging features are related to the type of therapy administrated, to the timing of re-assessment post therapy and to the imaging technique being used to observe the effects. Histological findings after both ECT and IRE show that the treated area becomes necrotic and encapsulated in fibrous tissue, suggesting that the size of the treated lesion cannot be measured as an endpoint to detect response. Moreover, histology frequently reported signs of apoptosis and reduced vital tissue, implying that imaging criteria, which take into account the viability and not the size of the lesion, are more appropriate to evaluate response to treatment.

Irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of ultrasonography

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel form of soft tissue ablation therapy that uses high-current electrical pulses to induce the formation of pores in the cell membrane, leading to cell death. Although outcome data for the ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by IRE are limited, early results are encouraging and may suggest equivalency to the outcomes achieved by thermal ablation methods such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA). However, IRE can be a challenging and very time-consuming procedure compared to RFA and MWA. In this review article, we not only evaluate the efficacy and safety of IRE for the treatment of HCC, but also discuss imaging guidance, ablation monitoring, and endpoint assessment, with a particular focus on ultrasonography.

Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Findings after Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation of Hepatic Malignant Tumors

The aim of this study was to describe ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings immediately and 1 d after percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) of hepatic malignant tumors. Immediately after IRE, the ablation zone was shown to be a gradually expanding hypo-echoic area around the electrodes. The microcirculation of the ablation zone was markedly reduced on CEUS (before vs. immediately after, p < 0.001), and the macrocirculation within the ablation zone was preserved. At 1 d after IRE, the ablation zones lost their hypo-echogenicity to become iso-echoic or hyper-echoic (before vs. 1 d after, p = 0.004; immediately after vs. 1 d after, p = 0.002). At this time, further elimination of microcirculation was confirmed on CEUS (before vs. 1 d after, p < 0.001; immediately after vs. 1 d after, p = 0.003). The size of the ablation zone, which measured by US, was strongly correlated with that measured by CEUS (length: r: = 0.929, width: r = 0.940, p < 0.001), was significantly enlarged immediately after IRE and shrunk 1 d after IRE.

Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging to Evaluate Immediate Response to Irreversible Electroporation in a Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative measurement of responses following irreversible electroporation (IRE) in a rabbit liver tumor model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve rabbits underwent ultrasound-guided VX2 tumor implantation in the left medial and left lateral liver lobes. The tumors in the left medial lobe were treated with IRE, whereas those in the left lateral lobe served as internal controls. DWI was performed before and immediately after IRE. Tumors were then harvested for histopathologic staining. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and change in ADC (ΔADC) were calculated based on DWI. Tumor apoptosis index (AI) was assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling. These measurements from DWI and histopathology were compared between untreated and treated tumors.

RESULTS

The ADC values, ΔADC, and AI showed statistically significant differences between treated and untreated tumors (P < .05 for all). ADC values were higher in treated tumors than in untreated tumors (1.08 × 10^-3 mm²/s ± 0.15 vs 0.88 × 10^-3 mm²/s ± 0.19; P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

DWI can be used to quantitatively evaluate treatment response in liver tumors immediately after IRE.

Irreversible Electroporation in Hepatopancreaticobiliary Tumours

Hepatopancreaticobiliary tumours are often diagnosed at an advanced disease stage, in which encasement or invasion of local biliary or vascular structures has already occurred. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an image-guided tumour ablation technique that induces cell death by exposing the tumour to high-voltage electrical pulses. The cellular membrane is disrupted, while sparing the extracellular matrix of critical tubular structures. The preservation of tissue integrity makes IRE an attractive treatment option for tumours in the vicinity of vital structures such as splanchnic blood vessels and major bile ducts. This article reviews current data and discusses future trends of IRE for hepatopancreaticobiliary tumours.