1
|
Liu F, Zhu H, Ma J, Miao L, Chen S, Yin Z, Wang H. Performance of iCare quantitative computed tomography in bone mineral density assessment of the hip and vertebral bodies in European spine phantom. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:777. [PMID: 37845720 PMCID: PMC10578019 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04174-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is a systemic bone disease which can increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered as the clinical standard for diagnosing osteoporosis by detecting the bone mineral density (BMD) in patients, but it has flaws in distinguishing between calcification and other degenerative diseases, thus leading to inaccurate BMD levels in subjects. Mindways quantitative computed tomography (Mindways QCT) is a classical QCT system. Similar to DXA, Mindways QCT can directly present the density of trabecular bone, vascular or tissue calcification; therefore, it is more accurate and sensitive than DXA and has been widely applied in clinic to evaluate osteoporosis. iCare QCT osteodensitometry was a new phantom-based QCT system, recently developed by iCare Inc. (China). It has been gradually applied in clinic by its superiority of taking 3-dimensional BMD of bone and converting BMD values to T value automatically. This study aimed at evaluating the osteoporosis detection rate of iCare QCT, compared with synchronous Mindways QCT (USA). METHODS In this study, 131 patients who underwent hip phantom-based CT scan were included. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the unified region of interests (ROI) defined at the European spine phantom (ESP, German QRM) including L1 (low), L2 (medium), and L3 (high) vertebral bodies was detected for QCT quality control and horizontal calibration. Every ESP scan were taken for 10 times, and the mean BMD values measured by iCare QCT and Mindways QCT were compared. Hip CT scan was conducted with ESP as calibration individually. T-scores gained from iCare QCT and Mindways QCT were analyzed with Pearson correlation test. The detection rates of osteoporosis were compared between iCare QCT and Mindways QCT. The unified region of interests (ROI) was delineated in the QCT software. RESULTS The results showed that there was no significant difference between iCare QCT and Mindways QCT in the evaluation of L1, L2, and L3 vertebrae bodies in ESP. A strong correlation between iCare QCT and Mindways QCT in the assessment of hip T-score was found. It was illustrated that iCare QCT had a higher detection rate of osteoporosis with the assessment of hip T-score than Mindways QCT did. In patients < 50 years subgroup, the detection rate of osteoporosis with iCare QCT and Mindways QCT was equal. In patients ≥ 50 years subgroup, the detection rate of osteoporosis with iCare QCT (35/92, 38.0%) was higher than that with Mindways QCT. In female subgroup, the detection rate of osteoporosis with iCare QCT was significantly higher than Mindways QCT. In male subgroup, the detection rate of osteoporosis with iCare QCT was also markedly higher than Mindways QCT. The detection rate of osteoporosis by iCare QCT was higher than Mindways QCT with hip bone assessment. Of course, the results of the present study remain to be further verified by multicenter studies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 130 Renmin Zhong Lu, Jiangyin City, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Hongmei Zhu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 130 Renmin Zhong Lu, Jiangyin City, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jinlian Ma
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 130 Renmin Zhong Lu, Jiangyin City, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Liqiong Miao
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 130 Renmin Zhong Lu, Jiangyin City, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Shuang Chen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 130 Renmin Zhong Lu, Jiangyin City, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zijie Yin
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 130 Renmin Zhong Lu, Jiangyin City, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Huan Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 130 Renmin Zhong Lu, Jiangyin City, 214400, Jiangsu Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang L, Yang M, Liu Y, Ge Y, Zhu S, Su Y, Cheng X, Wu X, Blake GM, Engelke K. Differences in Hip Geometry Between Female Subjects With and Without Acute Hip Fracture: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:799381. [PMID: 35282435 PMCID: PMC8907418 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.799381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although it is widely recognized that hip BMD is reduced in patients with hip fracture, the differences in geometrical parameters such as cortical volume and thickness between subjects with and without hip fracture are less well known. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five hundred and sixty two community-dwelling elderly women with hip CT scans were included in this cross-sectional study, of whom 236 had an acute hip fracture. 326 age matched women without hip fracture served as controls. MIAF-Femur software was used for the measurement of the intact contralateral femur in patients with hip fracture and the left femur of the controls. Integral and cortical volumes (Vols) of the total hip (TH), femoral head (FH), femoral neck (FN), trochanter (TR) and intertrochanter (IT) were analyzed. In the FH and FN the volumes were further subdivided into superior anterior (SA) and posterior (SP) as well as inferior anterior (IA) and posterior (IP) quadrants. Cortical thickness (CortThick) was determined for all sub volumes of interest (VOIs) listed above. RESULTS The average age of the control and fracture groups was 71.7 and 72.0 years, respectively. The fracture patients had significantly lower CortThick and Vol of all VOIs except for TRVol. In the fracture patients, cortical thickness and volume at the FN were significantly lower in all quadrants except for cortical volume of quadrant SA (p= 0.635). Hip fracture patients had smaller integral FN volume and cross-sectional area (CSA) before and after adjustment of age, height and weight. With respect to hip fracture discrimination, cortical volume performed poorer than cortical thickness across the whole proximal femur. The ratio of Cort/TrabMass (RCTM), a measure of the internal distribution of bone, performed better than cortical thickness in discriminating hip fracture risk. The highest area under curve (AUC) value of 0.805 was obtained for the model that included THCortThick, FHVol, THRCTM and FNCSA. CONCLUSION There were substantial differences in total and cortical volume as well as cortical thickness between fractured and unfractured women across the proximal femur. A combination of geometric variables resulted in similar discrimination power for hip fracture risk as aBMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Minghui Yang
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yandong Liu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yufeng Ge
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shiwen Zhu
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yongbin Su
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Xinbao Wu, ; Xiaoguang Cheng,
| | - Xinbao Wu
- Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Xinbao Wu, ; Xiaoguang Cheng,
| | - Glen M. Blake
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Klaus Engelke
- Department of Medicine 3, FAU University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Institute of Medical Physics, FAU University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this paper, we discuss how recent advancements in image processing and machine learning (ML) are shaping a new and exciting era for the osteoporosis imaging field. With this paper, we want to give the reader a basic exposure to the ML concepts that are necessary to build effective solutions for image processing and interpretation, while presenting an overview of the state of the art in the application of machine learning techniques for the assessment of bone structure, osteoporosis diagnosis, fracture detection, and risk prediction. RECENT FINDINGS ML effort in the osteoporosis imaging field is largely characterized by "low-cost" bone quality estimation and osteoporosis diagnosis, fracture detection, and risk prediction, but also automatized and standardized large-scale data analysis and data-driven imaging biomarker discovery. Our effort is not intended to be a systematic review, but an opportunity to review key studies in the recent osteoporosis imaging research landscape with the ultimate goal of discussing specific design choices, giving the reader pointers to possible solutions of regression, segmentation, and classification tasks as well as discussing common mistakes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Pedoia
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | - Francesco Caliva
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Galateia Kazakia
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Andrew J Burghardt
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Sharmila Majumdar
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1700 Fourth Street, Suite 201, QB3 Building, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Federer SJ, Jones GG. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: A scoping review. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260471. [PMID: 34813611 PMCID: PMC8610245 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a growing interest in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to orthopaedic surgery. This review aims to identify and characterise research in this field, in order to understand the extent, range and nature of this work, and act as springboard to stimulate future studies. A scoping review, a form of structured evidence synthesis, was conducted to summarise the use of AI in orthopaedics. A literature search (1946-2019) identified 222 studies eligible for inclusion. These studies were predominantly small and retrospective. There has been significant growth in the number of papers published in the last three years, mainly from the USA (37%). The majority of research used AI for image interpretation (45%) or as a clinical decision tool (25%). Spine (43%), knee (23%) and hip (14%) were the regions of the body most commonly studied. The application of artificial intelligence to orthopaedics is growing. However, the scope of its use so far remains limited, both in terms of its possible clinical applications, and the sub-specialty areas of the body which have been studied. A standardized method of reporting AI studies would allow direct assessment and comparison. Prospective studies are required to validate AI tools for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J. Federer
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Hub, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Gareth G. Jones
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Hub, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kong SH, Shin CS. Applications of Machine Learning in Bone and Mineral Research. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2021; 36:928-937. [PMID: 34674509 PMCID: PMC8566132 DOI: 10.3803/enm.2021.1111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In this unprecedented era of the overwhelming volume of medical data, machine learning can be a promising tool that may shed light on an individualized approach and a better understanding of the disease in the field of osteoporosis research, similar to that in other research fields. This review aimed to provide an overview of the latest studies using machine learning to address issues, mainly focusing on osteoporosis and fractures. Machine learning models for diagnosing and classifying osteoporosis and detecting fractures from images have shown promising performance. Fracture risk prediction is another promising field of research, and studies are being conducted using various data sources. However, these approaches may be biased due to the nature of the techniques or the quality of the data. Therefore, more studies based on the proposed guidelines are needed to improve the technical feasibility and generalizability of artificial intelligence algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Hye Kong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam,
Korea
| | - Chan Soo Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smets J, Shevroja E, Hügle T, Leslie WD, Hans D. Machine Learning Solutions for Osteoporosis-A Review. J Bone Miner Res 2021; 36:833-851. [PMID: 33751686 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis and its clinical consequence, bone fracture, is a multifactorial disease that has been the object of extensive research. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) have enabled the field of artificial intelligence (AI) to make impressive breakthroughs in complex data environments where human capacity to identify high-dimensional relationships is limited. The field of osteoporosis is one such domain, notwithstanding technical and clinical concerns regarding the application of ML methods. This qualitative review is intended to outline some of these concerns and to inform stakeholders interested in applying AI for improved management of osteoporosis. A systemic search in PubMed and Web of Science resulted in 89 studies for inclusion in the review. These covered one or more of four main areas in osteoporosis management: bone properties assessment (n = 13), osteoporosis classification (n = 34), fracture detection (n = 32), and risk prediction (n = 14). Reporting and methodological quality was determined by means of a 12-point checklist. In general, the studies were of moderate quality with a wide range (mode score 6, range 2 to 11). Major limitations were identified in a significant number of studies. Incomplete reporting, especially over model selection, inadequate splitting of data, and the low proportion of studies with external validation were among the most frequent problems. However, the use of images for opportunistic osteoporosis diagnosis or fracture detection emerged as a promising approach and one of the main contributions that ML could bring to the osteoporosis field. Efforts to develop ML-based models for identifying novel fracture risk factors and improving fracture prediction are additional promising lines of research. Some studies also offered insights into the potential for model-based decision-making. Finally, to avoid some of the common pitfalls, the use of standardized checklists in developing and sharing the results of ML models should be encouraged. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Smets
- Center of Bone Diseases, Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Enisa Shevroja
- Center of Bone Diseases, Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hügle
- Department of Rheumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Didier Hans
- Center of Bone Diseases, Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bakker L, Aarts J, Uyl-de Groot C, Redekop W. Economic evaluations of big data analytics for clinical decision-making: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 27:1466-1475. [PMID: 32642750 PMCID: PMC7526472 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Much has been invested in big data analytics to improve health and reduce costs. However, it is unknown whether these investments have achieved the desired goals. We performed a scoping review to determine the health and economic impact of big data analytics for clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the National Health Services Economic Evaluations Database for relevant articles. We included peer-reviewed papers that report the health economic impact of analytics that assist clinical decision-making. We extracted the economic methods and estimated impact and also assessed the quality of the methods used. In addition, we estimated how many studies assessed "big data analytics" based on a broad definition of this term. RESULTS The search yielded 12 133 papers but only 71 studies fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Only a few papers were full economic evaluations; many were performed during development. Papers frequently reported savings for healthcare payers but only 20% also included costs of analytics. Twenty studies examined "big data analytics" and only 7 reported both cost-savings and better outcomes. DISCUSSION The promised potential of big data is not yet reflected in the literature, partly since only a few full and properly performed economic evaluations have been published. This and the lack of a clear definition of "big data" limit policy makers and healthcare professionals from determining which big data initiatives are worth implementing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lytske Bakker
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jos Aarts
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - William Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Finite element analysis informed variable selection for femoral fracture risk prediction. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 118:104434. [PMID: 33756419 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Logistic regression classification (LRC) is widely used to develop models to predict the risk of femoral fracture. LRC models based on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) alone are poor, with area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) scores reported to be as low as 0.63. This has led to researchers investigating methods to extract further information from the image to increase performance. Recently, the use of active shape (ASM) and appearance models (AAM) have resulted in moderate improvements, but there is a risk that inclusion of too many modes will lead to overfitting. In addition, there are concerns that the effort required to extract the additional information does not justify the modest improvement in fracture risk prediction. This raises the question, are we reaching the limits of the information that can be extracted from an image? Finite element analysis was used in combination with active shape and appearance modelling to select variables to develop LRC models of fracture risk. Active shape and active appearance models were constructed based on a previously reported cohort of 94 post-menopausal Caucasian women (47 with and 47 without a fracture). T-tests were used to identify differences between the two groups for each mode of variation. Femur strength was predicted for two load cases, stance and a fall. Stepwise multi-variate linear regression was used to identify shape and appearance modes that were predictors of strength for the femurs in the training set. Femurs were also synthetically generated to explore the influence of the first 10 modes of the shape and appearance models. Identified modes of variation were then used to generate LRC models to predict fracture risk. Only 6 modes, 4 active appearance and 2 active shape modes, were identified that had a significant influence on predicted fracture strength. Of these, only two active appearance modes were needed to substantially improve the predictive mode performance (ΔAUROC = 0.080). The addition of 3 more modes (1 AAM and two ASM) further improved the performance of the classifier (ΔAUROC = 0.123). Further addition of modes did not result in any further substantial improvements. Based on these findings, it is suggested that we are reaching the limits of the information that can be extracted from an image to predict fracture risk.
Collapse
|
9
|
|